Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ANN/RSCB-2018-0005:RSCB
Received 24 March 2018; accepted 31 May 2018.
ANTONELLA CHEŞCĂ (1), TIM SANDLE (2), DMITRIY BABENKO (3), ILYA AZIZOV (4)
1
Department of Basic, Preventive and Clinical Sciences,Faculty of Medicine, „Transilvania” University of Braşov,
Romania
2
Manchester University, United Kingdom
3
Karaganda State Medical University, Kazakhstan
4
Smolensk State Medical University, Russia
*Corresponding author
Antonella Chesca PhD.
Transilvania University of Brasov and at Lung Phthysiology Hospital of Brasov
E-mail: anto.chesca@gmail.com
Summary
Introduction
The aim of the study is to present structural
characteristics referring to the normal liver At present, hepatic steatosis is a common
comparing with structural particularities from clinical pathology. In this context,
liver at patients diagnosed with hepatic nonalcoholic and alcoholic forms are known.
steatosis. For this purpose of the present (Angulo, 2002;
study, were analysed microscopic aspects of Schutz , 2004). Nonalcoholic steatosis is
hepatic structures in hepatic steatosis by described as an occurrence within the
comparison with normal liver. From this point metabolic syndrome and it is associated with
of view, the study aims mainly observing the other types of diseases such as diabetes
hepatocyte cords and their modifications, like mellitus, obesity, or with the dyslipidemias
lipid deposits in hepatic steatosis, and less the within the metabolic syndrome (Ameer, 2014;
presentation of vascular components, which Beylot, 1996).
are not of major importance in hepatic On the other hand, the alcoholic steatosis is
steatosis compared with normal liver. caused by increased alcohol consumption that
It is well known that nowadays, hepatic leads to fat deposits in the structural
steatosis is one of the disease with a high components of the liver. ( Shin, 2012; Schutz
incidence at the persons from different , 2004) A favorable prognosis regarding the
countries. The factors implied in developing patients' lives can be achieved only if alcohol
of hepatic steatosis, are important to know, is constantly avoided (Fernando, 2013;
for a proper diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, as Hellerstein, 1999).
non alcoholic or alcoholic form. Etiological Laboratory investigations in conjunction
factor for a well establishing diagnostic as with imaging investigations lead us to the
hepatic steatosis, is metabolic syndrome diagnosis of hepatic steatosis (Jeffrey, 2004;
associated with other types of diseases, such Prasad, 2012). For morphopathological
as diabetes mellitus, obesity and diagnostic purposes, necropsy of the liver is
dyslipidemia. There are also other factors carried out, both in terms of macroscopical
implied in hepatic steatosis diagnosis. and microscopical analysis (Foster, 2008;
Knowing the impact of hepatic steatosis on Youssef, 2000). In this context, observing the
health, the present morphological study, show changes that occur in the structural elements
structural characteristics to liver diagnosed of the liver, which is an annexed digestive
with hepatic steatosis versus structural gland to the gastrointestinal tract, set the
characteristics to normal liver.
The Romanian Society for Cell Biology ©, Annals of R. S. C. B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, Antonella Chesca, pp. 58 – 62
58
Annals of R.S.C.B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, pp. 58 - 62 doi: 10.ANN/RSCB-2018-0005:RSCB
Received 24 March 2018; accepted 31 May 2018.
diagnosis of hepatic steatosis (Hilden, 1997; normal liver which establishes a standard for
Livingstone, 2004). comparison facing changes occurring in the
Macroscopical analysis of the liver hepatic steatosis liver. From this point of
along with microscopical analysis of the view, on a microscopic image made in detail
autopsy liver samples, processed according to using hematoxylin-eosin staining, cords of
conventional microscopic techniques and hepatocytes and structural components of
stained to visualize the structural elements, Kiernan space, a branch of the hepatic artery
establish the correct diagnosis in this and of the portal vein and the bile duct can be
pathology (Wacholder et.al., 2004). From this observed. (Figure nr.1)
point of view, it should be noted that in
patient related associated pathology
conditions, hepatic steatosis may progress,
leading to cirrhosis or hepatoma (Horton,
2002; Hou, 2011).
Certainly, in any of the forms
mentioned in this pathology, structural
analysis is able to determine a certain
pathological diagnosis (Borecki et.al.,1998).
As a result of this study, the microscopic Fig. 2. Liver. Hepatic steatosis. van Gieson staining
images point out structural components of the x40.
The Romanian Society for Cell Biology ©, Annals of R. S. C. B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, Antonella Chesca, pp. 58 – 62
59
Annals of R.S.C.B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, pp. 58 - 62 doi: 10.ANN/RSCB-2018-0005:RSCB
Received 24 March 2018; accepted 31 May 2018.
particularities in hepatic steatosis, the image influencing human fatness, Am J Hum Genet.,
below shows the detailed microscopic 1998, Sep;63(3):831-8.
Fernando HA, Chin HF, Ton SH, Abdul Kadir K,
appearance of the vascular structures of the Stress and Its Effects on Glucose Metabolism and
Kiernan space of a normal liver section 11β-HSD Activities in Rats Fed on a Combination
stained with Weigert´s hematoxylin iron of High-Fat and High-Sucrose Diet with
staining. (Figure nr. 6) Glycyrrhizic Acid, J Diabetes Res.,
2013;2013:190395.
Foster WG, Environmental estrogens and endocrine
disruption: importance of comparative
endocrinology, Endocrinology, 2008
Sep;149(9):4267-8.
Hellerstein MK, De novo lipogenesis in humans:
metabolic and regulatory aspects, Eur J Clin Nutr.,
1999 Apr;53 Suppl 1:S53-65.
The Romanian Society for Cell Biology ©, Annals of R. S. C. B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, Antonella Chesca, pp. 58 – 62
61
Annals of R.S.C.B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, pp. 58 - 62 doi: 10.ANN/RSCB-2018-0005:RSCB
Received 24 March 2018; accepted 31 May 2018.
The Romanian Society for Cell Biology ©, Annals of R. S. C. B., Vol. XXI, Issue 3, 2017, Antonella Chesca, pp. 58 – 62
62