Sunteți pe pagina 1din 10

Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Region XI
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Division of DAVAO DEL SUR

Individual Performance Commitment


Name of Employee : JEAN G. CAHILAP Name of Rater : WELLINGTON C. ALBISO
Position : Teacher I Position : Principal-1
Name of School : CORONON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Name of Approving Authority: NANCY T. IYOG
Rating Period : MAY 2017- APRIL 2018 Position: Public Schools District Supervisor

MAJOR
KEY RESULT WEIGHT RATING
FINAL
AREAS MAJOR OUTPUTS TIMELINE PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS *SCORE REMARKS
OUTPUT KRA
(KRAs) Q E T Ave
(MFO)
Basic Teaching- 1. Daily Lesson Plans/ MAY 2017 5% 100% of the required number of daily 97% of the required number of
Education Learning Lesson Logs and to lesson plans/lesson logs submitted on daily lesson plans/lesson logs 2 5 3 3.333
Services Process Instructional Materials APRIL 2018 prescribed dates without lapses. submitted * without lapses *
(Elementary) Submitted on prescribed days.
100% of the required IMs appropriately 5 5 5 5
100% of the required IMs were
prepared/ developed within the rating
developed for the lesson without
period without lapses. lapses* Utilized within time frame 8.333/2
=4.167 0.208
2. Teaching Strategies MAY 2017 20% 100% of the total number of learners 96% & below of the total number
to achieved 75% mastery level in all of learners achieved 75% mastery 1 5 5 3.667 0.733
APRIL 2018 learning areas within the rating period level in all learning areas*100%-
85% Mastery*100%-85% Mastery
with at most 2 lapses.
within time frame
3. Class Rules and Well- MAY 2017 3% 100% of the students oriented with the 100% of the students were
Behaved Pupils to class rules during the opening of oriented with the class rules* 5 5 3 4.333
APRIL 2018 classes without lapses. without lapses *during the
opening of classes
Zero (0) violation of class rules within Zero (0) violation of class 5 5 5 5
the rating period. rules without lapses 0 violation
within rating period 9.333/2
=4.667

0.140

1
4. Positive/ Productive/ Safe MAY 2017 2% 100% of the characteristics of positive, 100% of the characteristics of
Learning Environment to productive and safe learning positive, productive and safe 5 5 5 5 0.100
APRIL 2018 environment complied with within the learning environment complied
rating period without lapses. without lapses maintained
within the rating period
Subtotal – KRA-1 30% 1.181
Pupils’ 1. Complete and Accurate MAY 2017 5% 100% of subjects/learning areas taught 100% of subjects/learning
Outcome Class Record to have complete and accurate class areas taught had complete and 5 5 5 5 0.250
APRIL 2018 record/s within the rating period without accurate class record/s without
lapses. lapses completeness and
accuracy within the rating
period
2. Remedial/ Enrichment MAY 2017 10% 100% of the students’ remedial/ 100% of the student’s
Programs to enrichment needs catered to within the remedial/enrichment needs 5 1 5 0.367 0.367
APRIL 2018 rating period without lapses. catered to 100% conducted
within time frame
3. Updated Pupils’/Students’ MAY 2017 5% 100% of the required school records of 100% of the required school
School Records to students updated within the rating records of students updated 5 5 5 5 0.250
APRIL 2018 period without error. without error and updated
within the rating period
4. Students’ Mastery of MAY 2017 10% 100% of the total number of students 96% and below of the total number
required Learning to achieved 75% mastery level within the of learners achieved 75% mastery 1 5 5 3.667 0.367
Competencies APRIL 2018 rating period. level in all learning area,
100%85%mastery*100%-85%
mastery within time frame
Sub-Total – KRA-2 30% 1.234
Community 1. PTA Meetings/Conferences MAY 2017 4% 100% of the required PTA meetings 100% of the required PTA
Involvement Organized to facilitated without lapses in a semester. meetings facilitated without 5 5 5 5 0.200
APRIL 2018 lapses organized and facilitated
2 days before prescribed dates
2. Stakeholder Involvement in MAY 2017 3% 75% of identified stakeholders 77% of identified stakeholders
Monitoring and Evaluation to engaged/ involved in monitoring and engaged/involved in monitoring
of Programs Implementation APRIL 2018 evaluation of programs implementation and evaluation of programs 5 5 5 5 0.150
within the rating period without lapses. implemented without lapses
85% within the time frame
3. Project/Events/Activities MAY 2017 3% One (1) project/event/activity on One (1) project/event/activity
Initiated or Undertaken to community involvement initiated/ on community involvement 5 5 3 4.333 0.130
APRIL 2018 undertaken within the rating period initiated/undertaken without
without lapses. lapses. Initiated and undertaken
2 days before the scheduled
dates
10%
Sub-Total – KRA-3
0.480

2
Professional 1. Action Research MAY 2017 4% One (1) action research conducted No action research conducted
Growth and to within the rating period without lapses. 1 1 1 1 0.040
Development APRIL 2018
2. Professional Membership MAY 2017 2% One (1) affiliation in recognized One (1) affiliation in recognized
and/or Community Linkages to organization within the rating period organization without deficiency 5 5 5 5 0.100
APRIL 2018 without deficiencies. affiliated ahead of time frame
3. Published Work MAY 2017 2% One (1) work/research published within
to the rating period without lapses. No work/ research published 1 1 1 1 0.020
APRIL 2018
4. Received special award/ MAY 2017 2% One (1) special award/ citation/ One(1) special award/citation/
citation/ recognition for to recognition for exemplary performance recognition for exemplary 5 5 5 5 0.100
exemplary performance APRIL 2018 received within the rating period without performance without lapses
lapses. received within the rating period
Sub-Total – KRA-4 10% 0.260
Other Support 1. Wearing of prescribed MAY 2017 4% 100 % compliance with dress code/ 100% compliance without
Requirements uniform to uniform policies on prescribed days lapses*99% and below of 5 5 2 4 0.160
APRIL 2018 without lapses required days
2. Attendance/ participation in MAY 2017 4% 100% of flag rites attended within the 97% attendance without lapses
Flag Rites to rating period without lapses arrived 15 minutes before the 2 5 5 4 0.160
APRIL 2018 scheduled time
3. Attendance in meetings/ MAY 2017 4% 100% of required meetings/ 97% attendance without lapses
conferences and related to conferences and other related activities arrived on the scheduled time 2 5 3 03.333 0.133
activities APRIL 2018 attended without lapses
4. Submission of required MAY 2017 4% 100% of required reports submitted on 100% of the required reports
reports to due dates with two (2) revisions without revision submitted 2 5 5 5 5 0.200
APRIL 2018 days advance
5. Accuracy and completeness MAY 2017 4% 100% of forms and reports 100% of forms and repots
in accomplishing forms and to accomplished with accuracy and accomplished with accuracy 5 5 5 5 0.200
reports APRIL 2018 completeness and completeness without
lapses submitted 2 days before
due dates
Sub-Total – KRA-4 20% 0.853
GRAND TOTAL 100% 4.008 VS

Prepared by: Recommending Approval: Approved:

JEAN G. CAHILAP WELLINGTON C ALBISO NANCY T. IYOG


Teacher-I Principal- I Public Schools District Supervisor
RATEE RATER

3
4
Standards for Rating Teacher I-III

Key Result Quantity Quality Timeliness


Performance Weight per
Area Major Output
Indicator MO & KRA Description Rating Description Rating Description Rating
(KRA)
Teaching- 1. Daily Lesson Plans/ 100% of the required 5% 100% of the required number of
Submitted 2 days before
Learning Lesson Logs number of daily daily lesson plans/lesson logs 5 without lapses 5 5
prescribed dates (weekly)
Process lesson plans/lesson submitted
(30%) logs submitted on 99% of the required number of
Submitted 1 day before
prescribed dates daily lesson plans/lesson logs 4 4
prescribed dates
without lapses. submitted
98% of the required number of
daily lesson plans/lesson logs 3 Submitted on prescribed days 3
submitted
97% of the required number of
Submitted 1 days after
daily lesson plans/lesson logs 2 with lapses 2 2
prescribed dates (weekly)
submitted
96 & below of the required
Submitted 2 or more days after
number of daily lesson 1 1
prescribed dates (weekly)
plans/lesson logs submitted
Instructional Materials 100% of the required 100% of the required IMs were
5 without lapses 5 Utilized within time frame 5
IMs appropriately developed for the lesson
prepared/ developed 99% of the required IMs were
4
within the rating developed for the lesson
period without lapses 98% of the required IMs were
3
developed for the lesson
97% of the required IMs were
2 with lapses 2
developed for the lesson
96% & below of the required IMs
1
were developed for the lesson
2. Teaching Strategies 100% of the total 30% 100% of the total number of
100% - 85 % Mastery within
number of learners learners achieved 75% mastery 5 100% - 85% Mastery 5 5
time frame
achieved 75% level in all learning areas
mastery level in all 99% of the total number of
100%-80% mastery within time
learning areas within learners achieved 75% mastery 4 100% - 80 % Mastery 4 4
frame
the rating period. level in all learning areas
98% of the total number of
100%-75% mastery within time
learners achieved 75% mastery 3 100 % - 75% Mastery 3 3
frame
level in all learning areas
97% of the total number of 2 100% - 70% Mastery 2 Less than 100% - less than 2

5
learners achieved 75% mastery 75% mastery beyond time
level in all learning areas frame
96% & below of the total number
Less than 100% - 65% mastery
of learners achieved 75% mastery 1 100% - 65% Mastery 1 1
beyond time frame
level in all learning areas
3. Class Rules and Well- 100% of the students 3% 100% of the students were 2 days before the opening of
5 without lapses 5 5
Behaved Pupils oriented with the oriented with the class rules classes
class rules during the 90% - 99% of the students were 1 day before the opening of
4 4
opening of classes oriented with the class rules classes
without lapses. 80% - 89% of the students were
3 During the opening of classes 3
oriented with the class rules
70% - 79% of the students were 1 day after the opening of
2 with lapses 2 2
oriented with the class rules classes
69% & below of the students were 2 days or more days after the
1 1
oriented with the class rules opening of classes
. Zero (0) violation of 0 violation of class rules 5 without lapses 5 0 violation within rating period 5
class rules within the 1 violation of class rules 4 with 1 lapse 4
rating period 2 violations of class rules 3 with 2 lapses 3
With violation within the rating
3 violations of class rules 2 with 3 lapses 2 2
period
4 violations of class rules 1 with 4 or more lapses 1
4. Positive/ Productive/ 100% of the 2% 100% of the characteristics of
Maintained within the rating
Safe Learning characteristics of positive, productive and safe 5 without lapses 5 5
period
Environment positive, productive learning environment complied
and safe learning 99% of the characteristics of
environment positive, productive and safe 4
complied with within learning environment complied
the rating period 98% of the characteristics of
without lapses. positive, productive and safe 3
learning environment complied
97% of the characteristics of
positive, productive and safe 2 with lapses 2
learning environment complied.
96 % & below of the
characteristics of positive,
1
productive and safe learning
environment complied
Pupils’ 1. Complete and Accurate 100% of 5% 100% of subjects/learning areas
completeness and accuracy
Outcome Class Record subjects/learning taught had complete and accurate 5 without lapses 5 5
within the rating period
(30%) areas taught have class record/s
complete and 99% of subjects/learning areas
accurate class taught had complete and accurate 4
record/s within the class record/s
6
rating period without 98% of subjects/learning areas
lapses. taught had complete and accurate 3
class record/s
97% of subjects/learning areas
taught had complete and accurate 2 with lapses 2
Complied with accuracy and
class record/s 2
completeness beyond rating
96% & below of subjects/learning
period or time frame
areas taught had complete and 1
accurate class record/s
2. Remedial/ Enrichment 100% of the students’ 10% 100% of the students’ remedial/ 100% conducted within time
5 without lapses 5 5
Programs remedial/ enrichment enrichment needs catered to frame
needs catered to 99% of the students’ remedial/
4
within the rating enrichment needs catered to
period without 98% of the students’ remedial/
lapses. 3
enrichment needs catered to
97% of the students’ remedial/
2 with lapses 2
enrichment needs catered to
96% & below of the students’
remedial/ enrichment needs 1
catered to
3. Updated 100% of the required 5% 100% of the required school
5 without error 5 Updated within the rating period 5
Pupils’/Students’ School school records of records of students updated
Records students updated 99% of the required school
4
. within the rating records of students updated
period without error. 98 % of the required school
3
records of students updated
97 % of the required school
2 with errors 2 Updated beyond time frame 2
records of students updated
96 % & below of the required
school records of students 1
updated
4. Students’ Mastery of 100% of the total
required Learning number of students
Competencies achieved 75% Refer to MIO on Teaching
mastery level within Strategies
the rating period.

Community 1. PTA Meetings/ 100% of the required 4% 100% of the required PTA Organized and facilitated 2
5 without lapses 5 5
Involvement Conferences Organized PTA meetings meetings facilitated days before prescribed dates
(10%) facilitated without 99% of the required PTA 4 Organized and facilitated 1 day 4
7
lapses in a semester. meetings facilitated before prescribed dates
98 % of the required PTA Organized and facilitated on
3 3
meetings facilitated prescribed dates
97 % of the required PTA Organized and facilitated 1day
2 with lapses 2 2
meetings facilitated after the prescribed dates
Organized and facilitated 2 or
96 % & below of the required PTA
1 more days after the prescribed 1
meetings facilitated
dates
2. Stakeholder Involvement 75% of identified 3% 77% of identified stakeholders
in Monitoring and stakeholders engaged/ involved in monitoring
5 without lapses 5 85% within time frame 5
Evaluation of Programs engaged/ involved in and evaluation of programs
Implementation monitoring and implementation
evaluation of 76% of identified stakeholders
programs engaged/ involved in monitoring
4 80 % within time frame 4
implementation within and evaluation of programs
the rating period implementation
without lapses. 75% of identified stakeholders
engaged/ involved in monitoring
3 75% -within time frame 3
and evaluation of programs
implementation
74% of identified stakeholders
engaged/ involved in monitoring
2 with lapses 2 75 beyond time frame 2
and evaluation of programs
implementation
73% & below of identified
stakeholders engaged/ involved in
1
monitoring and evaluation of
programs implementation
3. Project/Events/Activities One (1) 3% One (1) project/event/activity on
Initiated and undertaken 2 days
Initiated or Undertaken project/event/activity community involvement initiated/ 5 without lapses 5 5
before the scheduled dates
on community undertaken
involvement initiated/ Initiated and undertaken 1 day
- - 4
undertaken within the before the scheduled dates
rating period without Initiated and undertaken on
lapses. - - 3
scheduled dates
Initiated and undertaken 1 day
- - with lapses 2 2
after the scheduled dates
No project/event/activity on Initiated and undertaken 2 or
community involvement initiated/ 1 more days after the scheduled 1
undertaken dates
Professional 1. Action Research One (1) action 4% One (1)action research conducted 5 without lapses 5 Completed ahead of time frame 5
Growth and research conducted - -
Development within the rating - - Conducted/completed within 3

8
(10%) period without time frame
lapses. Conducted / completed beyond
- - with lapses 2 2
time frame
Noaction research conducted 1
2. Professional One (1) affiliation in 2% One (1) affiliation in recognized
5 without deficiency 5 Affiliated ahead of time frame 5
Membership and/or recognized organization
Community Linkages organization within - -
the rating period - - Affiliated within time frame 3
without deficiencies. - - with deficiencies 2 Affiliated beyond time frame 2
No affiliation in recognized
1 1
organization
3. Published Work One (1) 2% One (1) work/research published 5 without lapses 5 Published ahead of time frame 5
work/research - -
published within the - - Published within time frame 3
rating period without - - with lapses 2 Published beyond time frame 2
lapses.
No work/research published 1
4. Received special award/ One (1) special 2% One (1) special award/ citation/
Received within the rating
citation/ recognition for award/ citation/ recognition for exemplary 5 without lapses 5 5
period
exemplary performance recognition for performance
exemplary -
performance -
received within the - with lapses 2
rating period without No special award/ citation/
lapses. recognition for exemplary 1 None 1
performance
Other Support 1. Wearing of prescribed 100 % compliance 4% 100% compliance 5 Without lapses 5 100% of the required days 5
Requirements uniform with dress code/ 99% compliance 4
(20%) uniform policies on 98 % compliance 3
prescribed days 99% and below of required
without lapses 97 % compliance 2 With lapses 2 2
days
96% and below 1
2. Attendance/ participation 100% Flag Rites 4% Arrived 15 minutes before the
100% attendance 5 Without lapses 5 5
in Flag Rites attended/ participated scheduled time
within the rating Arrived 10 minutes before the
99% attendance 4 4
period without lapses scheduled time
98 % attendance 3 Arrived on the scheduled time 3
97 % attendance 2 With lapses 2 Arrived behind schedule 2
96% and below 1
3. Attendance in meetings/ 100% of required 4% Arrived 15 minutes before the
100% attendance 5 Without lapses 5 5
conferences and related meetings/ scheduled time
activities conferences and Arrived 10 minutes before the
99% attendance 4 4
related activities scheduled time
9
attended without 98 % attendance 3 Arrived on the scheduled time 3
lapses 97 % attendance 2 With lapses 2 Arrived behind schedule 2
96% and below 1
4. Submission of required 100% of required 4% 100% of the required reports 5 Without revision 5 Submitted 2 days advance 5
reports reports submitted on With 1 revision 4 Submitted 1 day advance 4
the scheduled dates With 2 revisions 3 Submitted on due date 3
with two revisions 99% and below of the required
2 With 3 revisions 2 Submitted 1 day late 2
reports not submitted
With 4 or more
1 Submitted 2 or more days late 1
revisions
5. Accuracy and 100% of required 4% 100% of forms and reports
Submitted 2 days before due
completeness in forms and reports accomplished with accuracy and 5 Without lapses 5 5
dates
accomplishing required accomplished with completeness
forms and reports accuracy and 99% of forms and reports
Submitted 1 day before due
completeness without accomplished with accuracy and 4 4
dates
lapses completeness
98 % of forms and reports
accomplished with accuracy and 3 Submitted on due dates 3
completeness
97% of forms and reports
Submitted 1 day after due
accomplished with accuracy and 2 With lapses 2 2
dates
completeness
Submitted 2 or more days after
96% and below 1 1
due dates
TOTAL 100%

10

S-ar putea să vă placă și