Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chapter 13
Dynamic Modal Analysis
1..,-,",^
Introduction
All objects will vibrate when subjectcd to impact, noise or vibration. And many systems
can resonate, where small forces can result in Iarge deflormation, and damage can be
indnced in the systems. Resonance is the tendency ofa system to oscillate at maximum
amplitude at certain frequencies, klown as the system's resonant frequencies. At these
frequencies, even small driving forces can produce large amplitude vibrations. When
damping is small, the resonant frequency is approximately equal to the natural
frequency of the system, which is the frequency offree vibrations. Any physical
structure can be modeled as a number of springs, masses and dampers. The multifude of
spring-mass-damper systems that make up a mechanical system are called degrees of
freedom; and the vibration energy put into a system will distribute itself among the
degrees offreedom in amounts depending on their natural frequencies and damping, and
on the frequency olthe energy source. The response of the system is different at each of
the diflerent natural frequencies; and these deformation pattems are called mode
shapes. Frequency analysis (or Modal analysis) is the study of the dynamic properties
of systems under excitation. Detailed frequency analysis dctermines the fundamental
vibration mode shapes and corresponding lrequencies. Both the natural frequencies and
mode shapes can be used to hclp design better systems lor noise and vibration
applications.
Maxrmum C!rve:
E .q
I
6
e
E x 8
'a
E E
o
10 1.5
Frequency analysis can be relativcly simple fbr basic components of a simple system,
and extren.rely complicated for a complex system, such as a structure exposed to periodic
wind loading or dudng seisrnic activities. With the advancements of computers, the
accurate determination ofnatural frecluencies and mode shapes are best suited to using
special techniques such as Finite Element Analysis.
Dynamic Modal Analysis l3-3
Problem Statement
1) Determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes ofa cantilever bean.r. The beam
is made ofsteel and has the dimensions of 14.5" x 1/8" x 1".
I
T 118"
14.5"
2) Determine the first natural frequency and mode shapes of a cantilcver bearn with a
small halfpound object attached to the free end of the cantilever beam.
Preliminary Analysis
The cantilever beam is an example of a system, which can be modeled as a simple spring-
mass system. In order to model the vibration of the cantilever beam. the end of the beam
is chosen as a reference point at which the characteristics and response olthe beam are
measured. An equivalent system is then built so that the natural frequency of the system
can be determined. The equivalent spring constant can be calculated using bearn
deflection formulae. Calculation ofan equivalent mass is necessary because all points
along the beam's length do not have the same response as the end of the bearn. This
means that the equivalent mass, m", cannot be determined simply by using the masses of
the beam, but must be found by equating the energy of the system as it r.ibrates.
From Strength of Materials, the deflection at the tip of the cantilever beam can be
determined by
y- PL3
3Er
The deflection equation of the mass spring system is
F:ky
So the equivalent spring constant can be expressed as
,K-T
3EI
1) For the simple mass-spring system, the natural frequency can be expressed as
0n
E
=.,/l (in rad/sec)
Ynl
The equivalent mass (m" ) can be determined from the continuous system analytical
approach, and the first three natural frequencies ofthe cantilever beam can then be
expressed as
trt- un2
EI
,,-,. t 2
r,lhere &n = 1.fi75,4,6q4, 7.855
The first three natural frequencies and mode shapes ofa cantilever beam are as shown in
the figure below.
f,xlI
I
,,rt - (t.S7b)rm
*,, - (4.094)2
,* ^ - -,.t Fr
IT ut
ul:t : i.6)Cl-r
{ ' i -----=-:
V ntbLr
cnn
, TET u'here ftn = 1.g75, + 694,
: {ritl
,,* T.g5s
L= 14.5 in
mn: volumexDensity: 1 x0.12i x 14.s x0.0007324=0. 001326 Ibsec2
Therefore, in
I/ nnr
nLt
(rn" +0.2J6m6)Lt
[
--
col = (3 x 3. 0 x 1 07 x .627 x 1 04 I
1 (o.s I (32.2 x 1 2) + g.236x 0. 00 326) x ( 1 4.s)3)j t2
= 54.67 (rad/sec) 1
= 8.7O (Hz)
l3-6 lntroduction to Finite Element Analysrs
The Cantilever Beam Modal Analysi.s program is a custom built MS Windows based
computer program that can be used to perform simple Freqnency analysis on uniform
cross section cantilever systcms; rectangular and circular cross section calculations are
built-in, but other cross sections can also be used. The program is based on the analyical
methods described in the previous section. Besides calculating the first six natural
frequencies of a cantilever beam, the associated Frequency shapes are also constructed
and displayed. The program is very compact, 75 Kbytes in size, and it will run in any
Microsoft Windows based computer systems.
.i. First download the CBeamModal.zip file, which contains the Cantilever Beam
Frequency Analysis program, from the SDC Publications website.
3. On your own, extract the content ofthe ZIP fi1e to any folder.
Dynamic Modal Analysis 13_7
I] ]. F, : I0.01
The controls to the inputs and the display options are listed
toward the right edge of the program,s main window.
The first two items in the control panel are the required material
information: the Modulus of Elasticity (E) and the Density of
the material. Note that it is critical to use the same units foi all
values entered.
10. Click the Display button to show the results of the Frequency
analysis.
e ,Fiiliffidilii-
Dmsryil-ilffif-
Lenqrh:F Ai-
widrh miJ-
heish ljii:E-
riu Fiiii-
{. 0ther
Bop cal I
al*li-iffi
lD.ilt!]l]]
f-f:l
r:]
Starting SolidWorks
|-
I Rffi [ t. SolidWorks option on the S]arr menu or select the
Setect the
I -_--1.
.Sffi,- [.' Solidworks icon on the desktop to start Solic]Works. The
-';.d'*
II EOnron 1". SolidWorks main window will appear on the screen.
l'
+-*=.=--t
2. Click on the New icon, located in the Srandard
toolbar as shown.
New {ftrl+H}
Creates a new dorument,
5' Select the options icon from the Menu toolbar to open the options diarogbox.
6. On your own, create the dimensions and adjust the sketch as shown.
The solidworks simulation product line features two areas of Finitc Element Analysis:
structure and rhermal. strucrure focuses on the structural integrity of the desigrl and
thermal evaluates heat-transfer characteristics.
'l' Note that the sotidworks Simulation module is integrated as part of solidlltorks. All
of the solidworks simulation commands are accessible through thc icon panel in the
CommandManager arca.
* Note the default list of materials, which are available in the pre-define d sotidworks
Simulation material library, is displayed.
nbttriah h ttt default ltbrdy @ not be edited. you tu+ tu3r copy rhe matehat to
aosbm librdv to edt it,
4. Click Apply to assign the material property then click Close to exit
the Material Assignment command.
Applying Boundary Conditions _ Constraints
F or
frequency analysis, we do,not need to apply any extemal load
to the system. The
natura l.lrequenc ies
of physical sysrems are ;ffi;il
f
determined throLrgh the equivalent,asr_spring.vr,"il.'
r"p.ni.r,-'"'
r.r hich can be
lnhoduction to Finite Element
) For the frequency analysis, it is still necessary to confirm the convergence by using
a
coarse mesh as the first FEA mesh for the analvsis.
'!' A good ruIe of thumb to follow in creating the first mesh is to have about 3 to 4
elements on the edges of the model; but since we have a relative smalr
cross section,
we will use the height ofthe cross section as the initial element size.
6. Click on the OK
button to accept the
Mesh settings.
Dynamic Modal Analysis l3-lj
* Note that the first five natural frequencies of the FEA solutions are shown in the
List
Modes dialog box. The three natural frequencies from our analytical calculations
are
very similar to the frequencies found by SolidWorks Simulation.
r Note that the FEA resurts are very similar to the preliminary analysis results.
The
preliminary analysis calculated the first three modal shapes tobe 1g.71
Hz,
121 .85 Hz and,341 .22 Hz. Since the FEA analysis wai done
on a 3D model,
additional modal shapes may exist beyond the vertical plane on which the
preliminary analysis was based. The fourth FEA result;34g.07 Hz, does
match
better with the third modal hand calculation of 341.22 Hz. Besides comparing
the frequencies, it is also necessary to view and examine the direction -
of th"
modal shapes.
:rr'rdrdmetei5
I*,-___oxH
__1.t_ ll cdncel l
A.
.
it " ,_. * <-.v ,ffi!{1r:*r:}r"tlr}4:(1"
srandar,J mesh ,
-- E
l+I
4. Click on the OK butto n to accept the Meslz settings
and create a new mesh.
A
EI
.)t l+
study 1 {-Deftsull-)
6. lr the FEA Study window, click once with the
right-mouse-button on the Reszlls item to display
the option list and select List Resonant
Frequencies as shown.
.! Note that the FEA calculated natural frequencies of the refined mesh are almost
the same as the results ofthe original mesh. These results confirmed the original
results are
'I24.61 0.050424
2 780.55 124.?3 0.0080497
3 980.21 157.6 0.0063453
4 2185 0.0028756
5 3383.1 538 44 0.00'18572
Note that comparing these results to the original analysis, page 13-19, showed the
modal frequencies had not changed with the more refined elements, which validates
the perlormed FEA analysis.
Introduction to Finite Element
Note the first natural frequency is calculated as 9.18H2, which is similar to the result
from our preliminary calculation. We will also examine the effect of shifting the
additional mass so it is centered at the right edge of the beam.
16. On your own, modif, the 2D section and update the additional mass as shown.
20. Click on the Run bufion to stafi the FEA Solver to calculate
the results.
21' on your own, perform the Modar Anarysis
and view the resurts.
ru
Gonclusions
Finite element analysis has rapidly become a vital tool for design engineers. However,
use ofthis tool does not guarantee corect results. The design engineer
is still responsible
lor doing approximate calculations, using good design p.u"-ti.", ind applying gooa
engineering judgment to the problem. It is hoped that F-EA will supplement
lhIse skills to
ensure that the best design is obtained.
It should be emphasized that, when performing FEA analysis, besides confirming that the
systems remain in the elastic regions for the applied loading, other
considerationi are also
for example, Iarge displacements and buckling ofb.u,,r, which can also
1mp919nt;
invalidate the linear statics analysis results. In performing finite elernent
analysis, it is
also necessary to acquire some knowledge of the theory behind
the method and
understand the restrictions and limitations of the softw;re. There
is no substitution for
experience.
Questions:
1. What is the main purpose of performing a modal analysis on a system?
2. What are the relations between resonant frequencies and the natural frequencies ofa
system?
8. For the cantilever beam with a mass attached at the end, when the attached mass is
relatively big, we can ignore the weight of the beam as a simplified approximation.
Calculate the first natural frequency of the tutorial problem using this approximation
and compare the results obtained.
Exercises:
The first four natural frequencies and mode shapes ofa unifofin cross section beams,
Simply suppo.ted
eods
FEed ends
.fl{ r7t ,s la !f
,ffi
F.E6 ends
C = 3.55 €- 942
!t0
Fixed -hinged
C = 7.95
1. Determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes of a simply supported beam.
The beam is made of steel and has the dimensions of 14.5, x 118,, x l', .
2. Determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes ofa fixed-hinged beam. The
beam is made of steel and has the dimensions of 14.5,,x I/8,,x1',.
3. Modal analyses can also be performed using lD beam elements; for the above two
problems perform beam modal analyses and compare the results.