Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com/predictions/astrology/jyotish-is-ved-anga/
Some Astrologers have a misunderstanding that Jyotish is not a part of the Vedas, which is
utterly an absurd misunderstanding. Had these Astrologers been well read, and done their
homework, probably this air of disbelief would not have risen since last few years. Through
this post, I attempt to reinstate the fact that the Jyotish which we are into is indeed a
Vedanga Jyotish.
1) The 4th Mantra of the 8th Sookta of the 10th Kanda of the
talks about the Chakra (Zodiac), with 12 Pradhayas (Spokes or the 12 Parts - Signs ) and 360
Nails ( Degrees of the Zodiac). It also talks of the 3 Nabhies which is nothing but the points of
the ellipse (which is the Zodiac that's not an exact circle but Conical. Also, one can read
about the ellipse in the Wikipedia for further information). After reading this, can anyone tell
that Jyotish was not known to the Ancient Vedic people.
2) In the 19th Kanda of the Atharva Veda, the 10th Mantra speaks about getting grace from
the Moon, the Sun, and from Rahu and Ketu too (If this is not Jyotish then what is it?).
3) In the Rig veda, the 11th Mantra of the 51st Sookta of the first Mandal, talks about
association of Heart Diseases related to the Sun. This Mantra requests the Sun to destroy all
Heart troubles to any native (If this is Not Jyotish, then what is it?).
4) The Mantra 13th from the same Sookta as above talks about "Strength and Prowess"
being related to the Sun, and requests the Sun to grant power so that it may enable one to
kill his enemies (If this is not Jyotish then what is it?).
5) The 1st Mantra of the 115th Sookta of the Rigveda speaks of the Sun as the Atma. (Don't
we treat the Sun as the same in Jyotish?).
6) Mantra 89 of 4th Sookta of the 18th Kanda of the Atharvaveda relates the Moon to a
Watery core (Don't we treat the Moon as Watery in Jyotish?).
7) The Bhagavd Gita, Chapter 15 Shloka 13 also talks about the Moon as being Watery and
nourishing all Planets – vegetable (Don't we have the same reference in Jyotish too?).
8) Yajurveda Chapter 15 and Mantra 54 mentions about Budh being related to consciousness
(Don't we have Mercury related to Intelligence in Jyotish?).
9) Yajurveda Chapter 19 Shloka 75 talks about the Planet Venus and its relation to the
accumulations of Semen in the body (Don't we have Venus as the Karaka for Semen in
Jyotish?)
The above makes it very evident that Jyotish is very much a part of Indian heritage and also
an integral part of the Vedic Lore.
Do you want to know what's the most favourable time to perform a particular thing like
buying a new property or new vehicle, or for marriage etc.?
Get product Fortune Time, to know the most suitable time to buy a new property or new
vehicle or to arrange for marriage etc. Based on your Natal Chart, you will get a fully
personalised report from the astrological perspective.
https://www.amazon.com/Atharva-Sanskrit-English-Translation-Explanaotry/dp/8179940128
https://www.amazon.com/Holy-Vedas-Veda-Yajur-Atharva/dp/8176465291
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Asuri-Kalpa-Witchcraft-Practice-Atharva-Veda-Classic/dp/B0087IWVU4
https://www.exoticindiaart.com/book/details/sama-veda-sanskrit-text-english-translation-and-
notes-set-of-2-volumes-NAF376/
https://www.vedanet.com/nakshatras-and-upanakshatras/
“But, indeed, that Fire-altar also is the sun:-the regions are its enclosing stones,
and there are three hundred and sixty of these, because three hundred and
sixty regions encircle the sun on all sides;-the rays are its Yajushmati bricks, for
there are three hundred and sixty of these, and three hundred and sixty rays of
the sun.”
The sun is surrounded by three hundred and sixty directions and gives forth three hundred and
sixty rays that relate to these directions. This suggests a zodiac or belt through which the Sun
travels. The idea is developed further in the same section.
“But, indeed, that built Agni (the fire-altar) is all beings, all the gods; for all the
gods, all beings are the waters, and that built fire-altar is the same as those
waters;-the navigable streams (round the sun) are its enclosing stones, and
there are three hundred and sixty of these, because three hundred and sixty
navigable streams encircle the sun on all sides; and the navigable streams,
indeed, are also the Yajushmati bricks, and there are three hundred and sixty
of these, because three hundred and sixty navigable streams flow towards the
sun.”
The Sun is figured as riding in a boat as early as the Rg Veda (for example RV V.45.10-11) but
also other ancient literature, like the Egyptian. Three hundred and sixty streams circle and sun and
three hundred and sixty more flow toward the sun. The sun in its travels crosses over these, which
are like lines of longitude.
While these 720 rays and directions or streams are equated with the days and nights of the year,
they clearly have a spatial existence as well. This is verified further by their equation with the
Nakshatras and Upanakshatras.
In other words a zodiac of 360 or 720 divisions was known in the late Vedic period long before any
contact with Greek astronomy or even much of Babylonian astronomy. This zodiac has
antecedents in Vedic literature going all the way back to the Rg Veda itself and may have existed
there as well. This suggests the existence of a long and independent tradition of astronomy in
India.
Now this wheel of heaven of 360 parts, as already noted, is also divided by twelve. As this wheel
has a spatial as well as temporal reality, this suggests a zodiac divided into twelve divisions. In
other words a zodiac of twelve divisions does exist at least as an idea in Vedic thought going back
to the Brahmanas or perhaps even to the Rg Veda. However there appears to be no place in Vedic
literature where these twelve divisions are given names like the twelve signs of the zodiac. Nor are
we certain at which point in the zodiac they began, but further research may help answer these
questions.
Conclusion
While one could argue that such subtler divisions were merely conceptual and that the Vedic
people were unable to observe or to use them, the very fact that they had the idea gives them
much more sophistication than generally granted them. If they had the idea, they would likely have
tried to use it, particularly since they had many related ideas of different divisions of time and
space, especially because Vedic texts speak of observing Nakshatras.
Such information as in this paper suggests that the Vedic level of calculation relative to time, space
and the stars, was much higher than generally acknowledged and may have had a greater
influence on other cultures than yet properly considered, perhaps extending to Babylonian,
Egyptian and Greek thought in which modern scholars, not knowing the Vedic information,
generally see the origins of a zodiac of 360 degrees.
Usage of the Upanakshatras Today
In Vedic astrology today, there are some computer programs like Sri Jyoti that do calculate the
Upanakshatras. This allows us greater specificity in dealing with the Nakshatras and their meaning.
The normal way of using the Nakshatras is to first examine their general meaning and second to
look into the particular Nakshatra pada or quarter of the Nakshatra (a division of 3 degees and 20
minutes or 200 minutes), which have their subset of planetary rulers. These in turn relate to
Navamshas and their respective signs.
The Upanakshatras provide us a deeper level of examination, with each Upanakshatra covering
an area of slightly less than 30 minutes or half a degree. Examining the Upanakshatras and their
effects on the life and personality is an important new area of chart examination. One looks at the
relationship of Nakshatra and Upanakshatra in terms of nature and rulership and their
interrelationship. This can be done not only relative to the Moon but also relative to all the planets.
We would urge serious practitioners to examine this issue further.
Translations from Satapatha Brahmana are from the Sacred Books of the East Vol. 12, 26, 41, 43,
44. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1988. All oher Sanskrit translations are by the author.