Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
cost-effective alternatives to timber poles due to distribution level. This is achieved by utilizing a
environmental concerns, durability, high cost of transformer. The primary distribution system is where
maintenance, and need for improved aesthetics the stepped-down power from the substation is carried
(Lacoursiere, 1999). Thus, concrete poles have ability to distribution transformers through feeders. The
to withstand wind, ice, heavy snow, persistently wet or feeders exit the substation through underground feeder
swampy areas where the soil greatly shorten the life get-away which is routed to nearby poles. The cables
expectancy, chemical contamination and pollution area then exit from the ground and become overhead three-
where rate of decay of other pole types may be erratic, phase main lines. Overhead feeder components include
and other harsh conditions, and could potentially help poles, overhead lines, and pole-mounted transformers.
to enhance system reliability. The tensile strength of Poles support the overhead distribution equipment.
concrete is only about 10% of the compressive strength Distribution poles and lines are critical in the reliability
(Blake et al., 2013). As a result of this, nearly all of a distribution system during natural hazards because
reinforced concretes are designed on the assumption they are exposed to falling trees and other debris, as
that concrete does not resist tensile stress. well as direct wind forces. The secondary distribution
Reinforcement is designed to carry this tensile stress, system is the last stage where the stepped-down
which is transferred by bonds between the interface of electricity from the pole-mounted transformers is
the two materials. Reinforced concrete is a strong and transported to the consumers. This is done through
durable building material that can be given various simple overhead service drops or more complex
shapes and sizes. Its usage is achieved by combining secondary networks. Secondary systems are usually
the best features of concrete and other materials. In radial (only one path available) except for vital
Nigeria, electricity is transmitted by conductors carried structures that are essential during disasters.
overhead by concrete and wooden poles. Concrete pole
design is dependent on the power and voltage that is to
be transmitted (Ilochi et al., 1996). In Nigeria, 2. Reliability Consideration
33/11/0.415KV is usually transmitted by overhead
conductors; hence the concrete poles are more suitable Recent researches in the area of structural reliability
for use. and probabilistic analysis have centered on the
The distribution system transports and delivers power development of probability based design procedures.
to the consumers after the voltage has been stepped These include loading modeling, ultimate and service
down to the appropriate level. The distribution system load performance, and evaluation of current level of
uses wires that are carried by timber, steel or concrete safety/reliability in design (Afolayan, 2014; Opeyemi
poles that are 9 to 12 metres high and spaced 30 metres 2012). In a reliability-based approach, uncertainty
to 45metres in the suburbs and 90 metres to 120 metres associated with material properties, loads,
in rural areas (Short, 2006). The voltage is usually environmental conditions, models etc. are taken into
between 4.16 KV to 34.5 KV in the primary account by treating the parameters as random
distribution system (Brown, 2008). Considering failure variables, processes or field. The condition of a
due to natural hazards, the distribution system is the structure is assessed by probability of failure, Pf or
most vulnerable (Davidson et al., 2003). This is related to the reliability index, given by Val and
because the generation stations are few and are usually Stewart (2009) as:
designed to withstand high wind, floods, and
earthquakes. The transmission system (towers and -1
(Pf) (1)
lines) is also designed to withstand natural hazards
better than the distribution system. Another reason is Where denotes the standard normal distribution
that unlike the distribution system, there is always function. For the calculation of Pf, the failure of a
more than one way to transport the electricity from the structure needs to be formally defined and expressed as
generation plants. The distribution system has several a function of relevant random variables, processes or
subsystems that include distribution substations, the fields. In this paper,
primary distribution system, and the secondary
distribution system. Distribution substations are the (2)
first stage in the distribution process. Electricity from Where x is a vector of random variables with joint
the transmission system enters into a substation probability density f(x) and is the failure domain
through a single transmission line. The main function defined as:
of the substation is to step down the voltage to the
103
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
104
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
3.2 Deterministic Analysis Using SAP2000 3.3 The Limit State Function
The SAP2000 advanced 14.0.0 application The difference between the resistance of the concrete
Programming Interface (API) is a commercially- pole and the applied load effect is the limit state
available powerful and sophisticated finite analysis function G(x), given as:
(FEA) and design software program. It allows users to
automate many of the processes required to build, (6)
analyze and design models and to obtain customized where, Mu is the resistance of the pole, and M is the
analysis and design results. This program features applied load effect.
sophisticated capacities, such as quick equation The load combination for the ultimate limit state at
solvers, force and displacement loading, non-prismatic adverse level from BS 8110-1: 1997 given as:
frame element, post tensioning multiple coordinate
systems for skewed geometry. A typical electric power (7)
distribution concrete pole under consideration was first The moment capacity for the compression section is
modeled on AutoCAD and then exported to SAP2000 given as:
software interface as shown in Fig. 1, for analysis to (8)
obtain the forces, moments and deflections at each While in the tensile section, the capacity is:
section of the concrete pole due to the applied design (9)
dead and wind loads at uncertain loading conditions
(1.4 Wind load + 1.4 Dead load) as specified by BS Let
8110-1:1997.
Thus,
(10)
The percentage reinforcement ratio (ρ) was varied from
the minimum of 0.55% to maximum of 3.00% with an
interval of 0.55. From equation (8) and (10), the
moment of resistance is a function of the breath,
effective depth, characteristics strength of concrete and
steel, lever arm and the area of steel provided.
The deflection of the concrete pole designed as
cantilever is given as:
Maximum deflection (11)
While
105
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
Table 2: The Limit State Function increases with reinforcement ratio, the pattern of its
sharp degeneration with increasing height is the same.
The failure of any structure can be measured in terms In order to examine the dependence of the reliability of
of the probability of failure Pf. On the other hand, the an electric concrete pole on its geometry and resistance
reliability of a structure is measured by the safety property, Fig. 10 was plotted. It can be seen that as the
index, . Reliability analyses were conducted for height of the concrete pole increases at any given
electric power distribution concrete poles based on the reinforcement ratio, reliability indices decrease.
derived limit state equations. The results obtained from Similarly, an increase in the reinforcement ratio at any
the probabilistic evaluation are discussed. height of the pole leads to an increased reliability
index. It is obvious that geometry plays a significant
Figs. 2 to 7 show the plots of reliability indices against role in the performance of electric concrete poles.
height of the electric power concrete pole of 9m high
under flexural failure. There is a general trend of Fig. 11 shows the reliability indices of deflection of
growing reliability index for the pole from its base to a concrete pole against the tapered cross section. It is
height of 1.5m before it sharply drops. Increase in the noticed that the reliability level of the concrete pole
reinforcement ratio also leads to increasing reliability, decreases as the cross section decreases. Below a
which of course, decreases with the height of the pole. cross-sectional area of 0.03m2, the criterion for safety
For instance, with a reinforcement ratio of 0.55, the is violated as the reliability index is less than 2.0 being
reliability index increases from 5.18 to 6.18 as the the target safety index as proposed by Elligwood
height of the concrete pole increases from the base to a (1987). The calculated safety index has negative values
height of 1.5m and then falls drastically to 0.65 at a at lower cross-sections signifying that the probability
height of 8m as can be seen in Fig. 3. of failure is high. A general comparison of the levels of
reliability associated with overturning moment and
The comparison of reliability indices at varying deflection, under uncertain material properties,
reinforcement ratio () from 0.55 to 3.00 as the height geometry and loading, shows that the key failure mode
increases from base to the top is shown in Fig. 8. of electric power concrete poles is the violation of
Generally, reliability index initially is higher at the deflection serviceability limit state (see Figs. 9 and 11).
base of the pole, which grows with the height to about Thus, sections above 4.5m from the base of electric
a point 1.5 m from the base. Although reliability power concrete poles are very critical to their
performance.
106
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
7 9
6 8
7
5
Reliability Index
6
Reliability Index
4 5
3 4
3
2
2
1 1
0 0
0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5
Height (m) Height (m)
Fig. 2: Reliability Index for Overturning Moment at varying Fig. 4: Reliability Index for Overturning Moment at varying
height for = 0.55 height for = 1.65
9
8
8
7 7
Reliability Index
6 6
Reliability Index
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5
Height (m)
Height (m)
Fig. 3: Reliability Index for Overturning Moment at varying Fig. 5: Reliability Index for Overturning Moment at varying
height for = 1.10 height for = 2.20
107
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
9 10
p=0.55
9 p=1.1
7.5 8 p=1.65
Reliability Index
7 p=2.2
Reliability Index
6
p=2.75
6
4.5 5
4
3
3
1.5 2
1
0 0
0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9
Height (m) Height (m)
9 9
8
7.5 7
Reliability Index
6
Reliability Index
6 5
4 p=0.55
4.5 p=1.10
3
2 p=1.65
3 p=2.20
1
p=2.75
1.5 0
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12
0 Cross Section (m2)
0 1.5 3 4.5 6 7.5 9
Height (m)
108
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
5. Conclusion
3
2 References
1
[1] Adaramola M S and Oyewola O M , Wind Speed
0 Distribution and Characteristics in Nigeria. ARPN
Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
-1 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
Vol.6, No2, (2011).
-2 [2] Afolayan J O, The Tower of Babel: The Secret of
the Birth and But of Structural Integrity. Inaugural
-3 Lecture Series 67, Civil Engineering Department,
Cross Section (m2) Delivered at the Federal University of Technology,
Akure, (2014).
[3] Blake E S, Kimberlain T B, Berg R J and
Fig. 11: Implied Reliability Indices for Deflection at Varying Cangialosi J P, Tropical Cyclone Report -
Cross-Section. Hurricane Sandy. (AL182012), (2013).
[4] British Standard Institution, BS 8110 Structural use
of concrete. Part 1 Code of Practice for Design and
Construction. British Standard Institution, (1997).
109
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Vol. 1 Issue 7, July 2016.
www.ijasrm.com
ISSN 2455-6378
110