Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ES
WILLS AND SUCCESSION
C. Elements of Succession
A. WILLS
J. WILLS IN GENERAL
Scanned by CamScanner
/
3. FORNIS OF WILLS
a. Basic Req u ireme nt s for a No tarial Will
l. Icasiano vs lcas iano , l 1 S CRA 422 ; GR L-18979 , June 30, 1964
2 . Azuela vs CA, GR 122880, April 12 , 2006
3 . Ortega vs VaJmon tc , GR 157451 Dec. 16 , 2005
4. The Estate of Ruiz vs. CA, G.R. No. 1 1 (;71, January 29, 1996
b. Acknowledgment of Wills
1. Cruz vs Villas o r, 54 SCRA 31; GR L-32213, November 26, 1973
2. Echavez vs. Dozen Const. And Devt. Corp., G. R. No.
1929 16 , October 11, 2010 3. G.R. No. 189984, No
vember 1 2, 2012
e. Joint wms
L Bilbao vs. BjJbao, &7 Phil 144, Aug, 2, 1950
2. deJa Cerna vs Rebaca Potot 12 SCRA 576, Dec. 23, 1964, GR L-
20234
4. WITNESS TO WILLS
a. Qualifications/Disqualifications
J. Ganz.ales vs CA, 90 SCRA 187, May 25, 1979
B. INSTITUTION OF HElR
1. Definition and Requisites
a. Pecson vs Coronel, 45 Phil 216, October 11, 1923
b. Parish Priest of Victoria Tarlac vs Rigor, GR L-22036 April 30,
1979
c. Robadilla vs.. CA,,G R. No. 113725 , June 29, 2000
5. Preterition
a. Definition and Requisites
b. Preterition vs Disinheritance
I. Nuguid vs. Nuguid 17SCRA 449
2. Acain vs IAC, 155 SCRA 101; GR L-72706, October
27, 1987
3. Neri vs Alcutin, 74 Phil 185, May 21, 1943
4. Viado Non vs CA, GR 137287, Feb. 15, 2000; 325
SCRA 652
5. Morales vs. Olandriz, G.R. No. 198994, February 3,
2016
C. SUBSTITIJTION OF HEIRS
1. Definition, Requisites, Purpose and Limitations
2. Kinds of Substitution
3. Fideicommissary Substitution
3,t R,gquisiws; Limitations and Prohibitions
1. Perez vs Garchitorena, 54 Phil 431, February 13, 1930
2. Ramirez vs Ramirez, 11 ISCRA 704 February 15
1982
3. Kilayko et al vs Tengco, GR L-45425; 45965, March 27,
1992
5. Disposition Captatoria
E. LEGITIME
1. Definition, Purpose and Implications
2. Classification of Compulsory Heirs
1. Noble vs Noble, 18 SCRA 1104, Dec. I 7, 1966
F. DISINHERITANCE
1. Nature, Concept and Requisites of Disinheritance
2. Effects of Invalid Disinheritance
3. Grounds for Disinheritance
L Pees.on vs Mediavillo, 28 Phil 81; GR 7890, September 29;
1914
2. Dy Yieng Seangio vs Judge Amor Reyes GR 140371-72 No
v. 27, 2006
A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
I. Concept of Intestate Succession
3. COLLATERAL RELATIVES
4. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN
a. The Iron Barrier
I. . Diaz vs IAC 182 SCRA 427 June 17, 1987
2. Cacho vs. Udan 13 SCRA 693 April 30, 1965
3. dela Merced vs dela Merced GR 126707 Feb. 25, 1999
4. Albolario vs Colinco GR 129163 April 22, 2003
5. In Re: lntestate Estates of Josefa
Delgado and Guillermo Rusria GR
155733 Jan. 27, 2006
5. SURVIVING SPOUSE
I. Santillon vs. Miranda, 14 SCRA 563
2. Verdad vs CA GR 109972, 256 SCRA 593 April 29, 1996
3. Annas vs CaJisterio Gr 136467 Apiil 6, 2000
6. THESTATE
I. City ofManila vs Archbishop 36 Phil 504 Aug. 30, 1917
2. Republic vs Guzman GR 132964 Feb. 18, 2000
A. RIGHT OF ACCRETION
I . Definition, Purpose and Requisites
2. Extent and Limitations
2.1. Testate and Intestate Succession
2,.2 Compulsory and Voluntary Heirs
I,.
E. COLLATION
*Legitime and Computation of
Net Hereditary Estate (NHE)
G. EFFECTS OF PARTITION
1. Exclusive Ownership of Property
2. Reciprocal Obligation of Warranty Among Heirs