Running Head: INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 1

Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) is a broad term used to describe a multitude of

lifelong disabilities that negatively affect the individual in the areas of intellectual and/or physical

development (NICHD, 2012). Common Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) categories

included under the IDD term are autism and intellectual disabilities (ID). ID is defined as having

impacting deficits in both intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviors (American Psychiatric

Association, 2013). Current studies estimate that around 1% of the world population is affected by ID

(McKenzie, Milton, Smith, & Ouellette-Kuntz, 2016). Autism is defined as a developmental disability that

affects the individual’s social abilities, including deficits in communication, executive functioning, and

sensory processing (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Current international studies suggest that

just over 1% of the world population is diagnosed with autism (Özerk, 2016). Both ID and autism have

recently had changes to their diagnostic criteria and definitions that may affect future diagnosis (Kulage,

Smaldone, & Cohn, 2014; Social Security Administration, 2013). Individuals with IDD have some of the

worst reported outcomes through transition and into adulthood (Lipscomb et al., 2017).

Community-Based Services

In the past 40 years, there has been an ongoing movement of deinstitutionalization in favor of

more community-based services for people with disabilities in the United States (Buell, 2003). This

movement has been supported heavily through legislation, such as IDEA, Americans with Disabilities Act,

and the Higher Education Opportunities Act. This, along with an increasing number of aging individuals

with IDD (Hogg, Lucchino, Wang, & Janicki, 2001; Patja, Iivanainen, Vesala, Oksanen, & Ruoppila, 2000),

has resulted in a need for special education services and related services for an older population within

a community setting.

Quality of Life in IDD

As the number of people with IDD living within their communities has increased, the idea and

importance of the quality of life of people with IDD has become a topic of research (Brown, Hatton, &
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 2

Emerson, 2013; Burgess & Gutstein, 2007). Quality of life is a social construct used to describe the

satisfaction derived from various aspects of an individual’s life, or more simply as a descriptor for what it

means to have a good life (Bishop-Fitzpatrick et al., 2016). Quality of life has been used to measure

satisfaction across a variety of people with a variety disabilities, disorders, or diseases. Schalock and

colleagues (2005) validated a list of 24 indicators of quality of life that fit into eight domains. The

domains are emotional well-being, interpersonal relations, material well-being, personal development,

physical well-being, self-determination, social inclusion, and rights. There is some disagreement on the

number of factors; some researchers add, subtract, or combine factors and indicators from Schalock and

his colleagues (Brown et al., 2013; Moss, Mandy, & Howlin, 2017). There is also debate on the

importance or the predictive nature of particular indicators over other indicators, but the core domains

are generally accepted (Burgess & Gutstein, 2007). An overarching theme of autonomy over one’s

choices in life is evident throughout the literature as an integral measure of an individual’s quality of life

(Kostikj-Ivanovikj & Chichevska-Jovanova, 2016; Moro, Savage, & Gehlert, 2017; Simões & Santos, 2016).

Some of the domains are fixed or externally controlled (i.e. rights, financial status, or health),

but many others are areas that could be influenced through targeted intervention. As the focus on

transition and community-based services has increased, a large amount of research and education has

centered around employment as a pathway to increasing the quality of life for individuals with

intellectual disabilities (Cawthon, Wendel, Bond, & Garberoglio, 2016; Dague, 2012; McConnell, Martin,

& Hennessey, 2015). Social inclusion (Hall, 2017; Qian, Tichá, Larson, Stancliffe, & Wuorio, 2015), self-

regulation (Eisenman, 2007; Shogren, Palmer, Wehmeyer, Williams-Diehm, & Little, 2012; Shogren &

Shaw, 2016), and education (Thoma et al., 2011) are other areas of intervention with the goal of

increasing overall quality of life for individuals with IDD.

Independent Living
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 3

With much of the focus of intervention research in this area being on employment skills in

preparing to transition out of secondary education (Rogan, Updike, Chesterfield, & Savage, 2014; Test et

al., 2009; Winsor & Butterworth, 2008), only a small amount of time preparing for adulthood during

secondary transitional education is focused on improving independent living skill (Haber et al., 2016).

Independent living is often defined by the skills that make up the construct including: personal self-care,

personal management, activities of daily living, financial management, and management of health needs

(Rowe et al., 2015). Individuals with IDD have deficits in independent living that grow in discrepancy

from the skills of their typically-developing peers as they age (Belva & Matson, 2013). As most of the

intervention and teaching of skills related to independent living happens in adulthood, the discrepancies

are already impacting multiple areas, including employability. The discrepancies make it a necessity for

these individuals with IDD to be dependent on either their family (often aging parents) or service

providers (Boehm, Carter, & Taylor, 2015; Esbensen, Bishop, Seltzer, Greenberg, & Taylor, 2010),

meaning less autonomy.

Various interventions have been used to teach independent living skills to individuals with IDD

across the lifespan. A recent meta-analysis of single-case studies (Ninci et al., 2015) identified four

common intervention method categories that the studies fit into: audio cueing, behavioral in vivo, visual

cueing, and video modeling. This meta-analysis also found that a majority of included studies were with

adults while the greatest effects were found in elementary-aged individuals suggesting the need for

earlier intervention of the skills included within independent living.

The purpose of this review is to identify the interventions used to teach independent living skills

to adults with IDD with the intent to establish potential interventions to use with secondary students

with IDD to increase skills in the areas of independent living prior to transitioning out of secondary

education placements. The research questions for this study are as follows:
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 4

Question 1: What are the interventions being used to teach independent living skills to students

with IDD in secondary education settings?

Question 2: Which of these interventions have been evaluated through experimental methods?

Question 3: What educational methodology is being used within the experimental approaches?

Question 4: To what extent are these studies generalizable?

Question 5: What are the effect sizes of the various identified interventions?
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 5

American Psychiatric Association (Ed.). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:

DSM-5 (5th ed). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.

Belva, B. C., & Matson, J. L. (2013). An examination of specific daily living skills deficits in adults with

profound intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 596–604.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.09.021

Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., Hong, J., Smith, L., Makuch, R., Greenberg, J., & Mailick, M. (2016). Characterizing

objective quality of life and normative outcomes in adults with autism spectrum disorder: An

exploratory latent class analysis. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 46, 2707–2719.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2816-3

Boehm, T. L., Carter, E. W., & Taylor, J. L. (2015). Family quality of life during the transition to adulthood

for individuals with intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders. American Journal on

Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120, 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-

120.5.395

Brown, I., Hatton, C., & Emerson, E. (2013). Quality of life indicators for individuals with intellectual

disabilities: Extending current practice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 316–332.

https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.316

Buell, M. K. (2003). Integration as acculturation: Developmental disability, deinstitutionalization, and

service delivery implications. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 26, 221–

260.

Burgess, A. F., & Gutstein, S. E. (2007). Quality of life for people with autism: Raising the standard for

evaluating successful outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(2), 80–86.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00432.x
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 6

Cawthon, S. W., Wendel, E. M., Bond, M. P., & Garberoglio, C. L. (2016). The impact of intensive

vocation-related course taking on employment outcomes for individuals who are deaf. Remedial

and Special Education, 37, 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516635753

Dague, B. (2012). Sheltered employment, sheltered lives: Family perspectives of conversion to

community-based employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 1–11. Retrieved from

http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh

&AN=77634592&site=ehost-live

Eisenman, L. T. (2007). Self-determination interventions: building a foundation for school completion.

Remedial & Special Education, 28(1), 2–8. Retrieved from

http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh

&AN=23768812&site=ehost-live

Esbensen, A. J., Bishop, S., Seltzer, M. M., Greenberg, J. S., & Taylor, J. L. (2010). Comparisons between

individuals with autism spectrum disorders and individuals With Down syndrome in adulthood.

American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115(4), 277–290.

https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.4.277

Haber, M. G., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Rowe, D. A., Bartholomew, A. L., Test, D. W., & Fowler, C. H.

(2016). What works, when, for whom, and with whom: A Meta-analytic review of predictors of

postsecondary success for students with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 86(1),

123–162. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315583135

Hall, S. A. (2017). Community involvement of young adults with intellectual disabilities: Their

experiences and perspectives on inclusion. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual

Disabilities, 30(5), 859–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12276

Hogg, J., Lucchino, R., Wang, K., & Janicki, M. (2001). Healthy ageing -- Adults with intellectual

disabilities: Ageing and social policy. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(3),
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 7

229. Retrieved from

http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh

&AN=6075268&site=ehost-live

Kostikj-Ivanovikj, V., & Chichevska-Jovanova, N. (2016). Relation between quality of life, choice making,

and future expectations in adults with intellectual disabilty. Journal of Special Education &

Rehabilitation, 17(3/4), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.19057/jser.2016.8

Kulage, K. M., Smaldone, A. M., & Cohn, E. G. (2014). How will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A

systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,

44(8), 1918–1932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2065-2

Lipscomb, S., Hamison, J., Liu Albert, Y., Burghardt, J., Johnson, D. R., & Thurlow, M. (2017). Preparing

for life after high school: the characteristics and experiences of youth in special education.

Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons across

disability groups. Full report. NCEE 2017-4018. National Center for Education Evaluation and

Regional Assistance.

McConnell, A. E., Martin, J. E., & Hennessey, M. N. (2015). Indicators of postsecondary employment and

education for youth with disabilities in relation to GPA and general education. Remedial &

Special Education, 36, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515583497

McKenzie, K., Milton, M., Smith, G., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2016). Systematic review of the prevalence

and incidence of intellectual disabilities: Current trends and issues. Current Developmental

Disorders Reports, 3, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0085-7

Moro, T. T., Savage, T. A., & Gehlert, S. (2017). Agency, social and healthcare supports for adults with

intellectual disability at the end of life in out-of-home, non-institutional community residences

in Western nations: A literature review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,

30, 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12374

INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 8

Moss, P., Mandy, W., & Howlin, P. (2017). Child and adult factors related to quality of life in adults with

autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1830–1837.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3105-5

NICHD. (2012). Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs): Condition information. Retrieved

November 6, 2017, from

https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/idds/conditioninfo/Pages/default.aspx

Ninci, J., Neely, L. C., Hong, E. R., Boles, M. B., Gilliland, W. D., Ganz, J. B., … Vannest, K. J. (2015). Meta-

analysis of single-case research on teaching functional living skills to individuals with ASD.

Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2, 184–198.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0046-1

Özerk, K. (2016). The issue of prevalence of autism/ASD. International Electronic Journal of Elementary

Education, 9, 263–305. Retrieved from

http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh

&AN=120560715&site=ehost-live

Patja, K., Iivanainen, M., Vesala, H., Oksanen, H., & Ruoppila, I. (2000). Life expectancy of people with

intellectual disability: A 35-year follow-up study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR,

44, 591–599.

Qian, X., Tichá, R., Larson, S. A., Stancliffe, R. J., & Wuorio, A. (2015). The impact of individual and

organisational factors on engagement of individuals with intellectual disability living in

community group homes: a multilevel model. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 59,

493–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12152

Rogan, P., Updike, J., Chesterfield, G., & Savage, S. (2014). The SITE program at IUPUI: A post-secondary

program for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40,

109–116. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140673
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 9

Rowe, D. A., Alverson, C. Y., Unruh, D. K., Fowler, C. H., Kellems, R., & Test, D. W. (2015). A Delphi study

to operationalize evidence-based predictors in secondary transition. Career Development and

Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414526429

Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., Jenaro, C., Wang, M., Wehmeyer, M., Jiancheng, X., & Lachapelle, Y.

(2005). Cross-cultural study of quality of life Indicators. American Journal on Mental Retardation,

110, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[298:CSOQOL]2.0.CO;2

Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Williams-Diehm, K., & Little, T. D. (2012). Effect of

intervention with the self-determined learning model of instruction on access and goal

attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 320–330.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410072

Shogren, K. A., & Shaw, L. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological

empowerment in predicting outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special

Education, 37, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515585003

Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2016). Comparing the quality of life of adults with and without intellectual

disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 60, 378–388.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12256

Social Security Administration. (2013). Change in terminology: “mental retardation” to “intellectual

disability.” Final rule. Federal Register, 78(148), 46499–46502.

Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L., & Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-

based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with

disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728809346960

Thoma, C. A., Lakin, K. C., Carlson, D., Domzal, C., Austin, K., & Boyd, K. (2011). Participation in

postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities: A review of the literature
INDEPENDENT LIVING INTRODUCTION 10

2001-2010. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 24, 175–191. Retrieved from

http://mutex.gmu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh

&AN=78175885&site=ehost-live

Winsor, J., & Butterworth, J. (2008). Participation in integrated employment and community-based

nonwork services for individuals supported by state disability agencies. Intellectual &

Developmental Disabilities, 46, 166–168.