Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

September 2000

Adobe Trapping Technology


®

Adobe’s Vision of an All-Digital Trapping Workflow

A detailed As the graphic arts industry moves to an all-digital workflow, there needs to be a fundamental change in the
description of way we prepare and process files for print production. Highly productive, automated tools are transforming
trapping our industry from a labor-intensive craft to a finely tuned manufacturing process. The need for automation
technologies of everyday tasks such as printing, spooling, OPI, and preflight is becoming a fundamental requirement in
print operations. Specifically, fast, accurate trapping of complex printed pages is becoming a vital component
available from
of an all-digital workflow and necessary for a profitable print operation.
Adobe Systems
Over the past several years, Adobe Systems has developed a full set of products to enable the vision of an all-
digital workflow. One of these offerings is Adobe trapping technology. Adobe trapping technology consists of
three main components:
• Trapping engine—Adobe in-RIP trapping and the Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) Trapper
• Trapping standards for describing controls and results of trapping—Adobe PostScript® 3™ and
Adobe Portable Job Ticket Format (PJTF) technologies
• Trapping controls—included in professional publishing applications like Adobe Acrobat® InProduction™,
Adobe InDesign™, and Adobe PageMaker®

This white paper describes the trapping technologies now available from Adobe Systems and certified OEM
partners. This paper explains how Adobe trapping technologies work with Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe
Extreme™ technologies. This paper also describes both Adobe in-RIP trapping and Adobe PDF trapping
workflows. Finally, the paper highlights some of the unique features and strengths, as well as, some of the
new features of Adobe trapping technology and how users can control these settings.
Since the scope of this white paper is limited to a description of trapping technology, you should refer to
the Adobe PostScript 3, Adobe Extreme, and PDF for Prepress Workflow and Document Delivery white
papers for additional information. These white papers are available on the Adobe Web site at www.adobe.com.

Background
Trapping is a prepress term used to describe the compensation for misregistration between printing units on
a multicolor press. As the printed sheet passes through each printing unit, a unique ink color is applied.
Ideally, each color should touch or butt fit, and there should be no shift during the printing process. Several
variables in printing can cause this shift to occur. These variables include the high speed of the printing press
and the poor dimensional stability of paper, which stretches as it is moistened by ink and water. This
misregistration causes unsightly gaps on the final printed piece. Gaps become especially obvious when two or
more elements with contrasting color mixes abut.
Trapping involves creating overlaps (spreads) or underlaps (chokes) of objects during the print production
process to eliminate misregistration on press. A well-trapped page must have sufficient compensation to
avoid visible gaps under the actual printing conditions, without introducing new artifacts that are themselves
unsightly. Quality trapping requires detailed analysis of the ink properties, the press characteristics, and the
Ë content of the page.
2

a. b.

Figure 1a: Yellow spreads into cyan.


Figure 1b: Yellow chokes into cyan.

Trapping Workflow Options


Today, users can trap their files in several ways. The most common practice is application-based trapping in
page layout applications like Adobe PageMaker or QuarkXPress. Within these applications, trapping is
specified at the page or object level. In Adobe Illustrator®, users trap their files manually by overprinting
stroked elements. Other trapping alternatives include competitive in-RIP trapping solutions (both raster- and
vector-based methodology) or trapping applications that run on separate trapping workstations and servers.
These solutions have limitations and do not allow the user to experience a consistent and predictable method
for defining traps. Application-based trapping only allows users to trap elements created in the native
application; imported graphic elements and images are ignored. Furthermore, users cannot always correctly
trap imported graphic elements against native content of the page layout application. For example, text com-
posed in the layout application cannot be trapped against underlying artwork. Since trapping is specified on
an object-by-object basis, trap changes are time-consuming and require user intervention. Finally, in applica-
tion-based trapping, trapping decisions must be made too early in the print production process—before the
details of the specific printing conditions are considered.

Server-based trapping solutions are capable of trapping all elements in a document. However, their workflows
are cumbersome because users must move their large PostScript files across the network to the server for
trapping and then back to the output device for imaging. Furthermore, there is a lack of support for
native PDF trapping.
Trapping solutions must be flexible enough to address many different digital workflows while providing
excellent quality and a range of options for imaging, proofing, and viewing. They must also maintain a consis-
tent user experience throughout these variations and accommodate the need for last-minute changes of print-
ing conditions, without depending on time-consuming human
intervention.

Today’s print production systems are moving toward automated and distributed workflows using composite
PostScript and PDF files. In this late-binding workflow, device-specific operations are performed at the last
moment—in the PostScript RIP. This includes activities such as color separations, imposition, and, of course,
trapping.
In automated and distributed workflows, users are able to use the same page content for multiple purposes,
responding to customer changes sooner. Application-based and server-based trapping workflows do not allow
for this type of flexibility. Automation of workflow and the flexibility to respond to last-minute changes of
device-specific content allows for greater throughput in prepress systems, which results in greater profitability.

Adobe Trapping Workflow


By implementing a trapping technology designed specifically for the Adobe imaging model, users can execute
trapping in various ways in an all-digital workflow. In contrast to trapping solutions, which dictate a single
workflow, the selection of an Adobe trapping workflow can be based on user requirements. The choice
depends on the type of work being produced and the choice of print production workflow used to produce
the work.
Some print production requirements, such as packaging or other specialty printing, justify the use of dedi-
cated equipment and operators. Those situations call for prepress workstations that include electronic
trapping applications. Solution software providers can choose to build these products based on Adobe
trapping technology.
3

In-RIP trapping
The simplest solution for Adobe trapping technology is an Adobe PostScript 3 RIP that includes Adobe in-
RIP trapping. With in-RIP trapping, users need not change their existing workflow. Users simply print to
their output device in the regular manner; files are trapped as part of the PostScript interpretation process.
Controls for trapping may be specified at the RIP through a device-specific user interface or through one of
the application-based user-interface options described later.
Adobe in-RIP trapping provides many benefits in a print production workflow, including:

• Support for composite Adobe PostScript 3 and PDF printing. This includes support for all PostScript 3
features including smooth-shading, DeviceN colorspace, and masked images. Therefore, advance
graphic constructs such as Hexachrome color, duotones, and custom color gradients can be trapped in
a composite workflow.
• Automation. Once traps have been specified, there is no additional operator intervention required. Traps
are executed in the PostScript RIP before the file is imaged to paper, plate, or film.

• Speed. Efficient use of CPU and system processing resources, which is integrated with the PostScript inter-
pretation process, minimizes the increase in overall printing time.
• Quality. In-RIP trapping traps all elements in the document, includes all the necessary features to create
quality traps, includes support for unlimited custom colors or varnishes, and supports rich blacks, gradient
and imaging trapping, and sliding traps.
• Ease-of-use. A consistent user interface is available in several desktop applications. In-RIP trapping can be
easily integrated into an existing print production workflow without the need for a dedicated or compre-
hensive prepress system or additional training.
PDF trapping—Future
An additional future workflow option is the Adobe PDF Trapper. PDF trapping is a more robust workflow
in which content-specific information is separated from device-specific information to provide greater flex-
ibility in the workflow. The key to the PDF Trapper is the use of the Adobe Portable Job Ticket Format
(PJTF). PDF/PJTF-based workflows are the basis of Adobe Extreme technology. Extreme systems use PDF as
their internal file format.
When trapping a PDF file in an Extreme system, users specify trapping controls in PJTF. The trapping is
executed by the PDF Trapper, which generates the traps and stores them as a special annotation in the
PDF file. The PDF file can then be printed to the Adobe Printer Job Ticket Processor or an Adobe
PostScript 3 RIP. This implementation allows users to selectively print or proof the trapped PDF.

Adobe PDF trapping will provide many additional benefits, including:


• Support for all the features in today’s Adobe in-RIP trapping
• Support for trapping composite Adobe PostScript 3 and PDF printing

• The ability to view trapped PDF files in Adobe Acrobat® software


• Round-tripping, which means traps can be specified, executed, edited, deleted, and stored in a PDF file, and
PDF files can be retrapped

By building a solution around the same core technology and user-experience, Adobe has enabled production
facilities to combine the automated solutions of in-RIP trapping and PDF trapping to gain a great deal of
flexibility in the workflow.

Adobe Trap Engine


The Adobe Trap Engine is a vector-based trapping technology. The engine recognizes the outline of vector
objects, as well as, bitmap elements and images. This means that traps are applied during the PostScript
interpretation process, but prior to rasterization. The engine is designed to work on all text, graphics, and
images supported by the Adobe Imaging Model and is implemented within Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe
Extreme.
4

Some trapping technologies available on the market today, first convert vectors objects to bitmaps, then
analyze for traps on a pixel-by-pixel basis. However, the Adobe Trapping Engine uses patented technology to
create traps for both vector objects and bitmap elements without rasterization. This significantly improves
the quality of the resulting trap shape, as well as, the overall speed and accuracy of trapping.

In addition, the trapping engine provides features whereby trap settings can be controlled by “trapping
zones.” A trapping zone is composed of a region of the page, or the entire page, and the parameters for trap-
ping in that region.

The result from the trapping engine is a “trapping network.” This network is an overlay of small fills that add
traps to the current page. In the case of in-RIP trapping, the trap network is imaged along with the file. In the
case of the future PDF Trapper, the trap network is placed in the PDF file in the annotation layer. When the
PDF file is viewed or printed, the traps in the annotation layer are included. By building a family of solutions
around the same trap engine, Adobe offers the assurance of consistent results, regardless of the specific
workflow.

Specifying Traps
The modular architecture of Adobe trapping technology allows for a consistent user interface for trap
specification in a wide range of environments. Trapping parameters can be specified through plug-in inter-
faces to applications like Adobe Acrobat InProduction, Adobe InDesign, or Adobe PageMaker*. Dedicated
tools such as an Adobe Acrobat plug-in or desktop trapping applications will have the same user-interface
attributes. Independent software developers can also offer prepress solutions that integrate control for
trapping using a similar user-experience.

Figure 2: The Adobe InDesign in-RIP trapping plug-in, Trap Style dialog box.

Users of an Adobe trapping solution are presented with three basic tasks. They must describe the properties
of the inks to be used, select the parameters for trapping, and designate zones or regions in which to enable
or disable trapping. By basing all user interface experiences on the same three aspects, there is no challenge
when moving from one trapping solution to another.

In some implementations of the Adobe trapping technology, trapping parameters are specified in the
PostScript RIP, either in the user-interface customized by the licensing partner or through the use of user
definable “hot folders,” which are also used as print queues.

Ink properties
The definition of ink properties is purely descriptive. For each ink, users must specify the ink density and
transparency/opacity of the ink as well as the order of ink lay-down. These parameters are all selected
through an ink settings dialog box. Adobe trapping technology supports trapping of unlimited process and
custom color inks, including varnishes.
Information about the printing or lay-down order of the inks is used to determine the correct behavior of
opaque inks, such as custom or metallic colors. Inks placed on the paper first will always spread or choke
5

under overlying opaque inks. This ensures that the resulting traps are concealed by the overlaying opaque
ink.
Trapping parameters
Trapping parameters are defined via trap styles. Each trap style describes a set of parameters, including trap
width, image trapping, trapping of gradients, and others elements. Once trap styles are created, they can be
used throughout a document or saved and exported for use in future documents. Furthermore, trap styles let
users apply different settings not only to different jobs, but also to different trap zones (pages or groups of
pages) within a single document.
* The Adobe PageMaker 6.5.2 plug-in for in-RIP trapping is available free of charge from the Adobe Web site at www.adobe.com.

Trap Zones
Finally, users specify trap zones. By default, a trap zone is the size of page. However, for greater trapping
control a user may wish to apply a different trap style to a particular section of a page or element on a page.
In this instance, regional trap zones must be created. In application(s) such as Adobe Acrobat InProduction,
regional trap zones can be defined within the page using the rectangle and polygon trapping tool. In either
case, once users define trap zones, they can assign a different trap style to each zone.

Figure 3: Regional trap zones defined in Adobe Acrobat InProduction.

Unique Features and Product Strengths


Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe Extreme
Adobe trapping technology works in conjunction with the latest Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe Extreme
technology. This includes support for PostScript 3 features such as masked images, DeviceN
colorspace and smooth shading, as well as composite PostScript and PDF printing, and in-RIP separations.
The DeviceN colorspace is used to define Hexachrome color, custom color gradients, and multitone images
(duotones) in a composite PostScript printing workflow. Both Adobe Photoshop® 5.02 or later, and Adobe
Illustrator 8.01 applications use the DeviceN colorspace to define these application features.
Corner mitering
Corner mitering is a unique feature of the Adobe trapping technology that enhances the quality production
of trapped elements. As discussed earlier, the trapping engine creates traps by calculating additional
PostScript paths that it adds to the job stream or, in the case of the future PDF Trapper, by annotating a PDF
file. As part of this calculation, the trapping engine applies a corner mitering formula at line intersection
points. This corner mitering formula ensures that unsightly spikes do not appear in documents after being
trapped.

Rich blacks and black width


To make large areas of black as dark as possible on a printed sheet, users commonly add layers of other color
inks to a 100 percent black background, such as 60 percent cyan or magenta. Such blacks are described as
having support screens or being rich blacks. To keep these support screens from showing along the edges of an
object, the trapping engine chokes back the support screen colors. In addition, when black abuts other colors,
it is common to create traps by spreading the other inks into the black area. The trapping engine allows the
user to specify a black width setting for both of these situations.
6

a.

b.

Figure 4a: With no black width, support screens may show through.
Figure 4b: Adding a black width chokes back the support screen.

Sliding traps
Adobe trapping technology uses neutral density of inks as its method of comparison for lightness and dark-
ness. Neutral density is a measure of ink’s light-stopping ability or, more simply, a measure of its opacity.
When colors have similar neutral densities, neither color determines the direction of the trap. To trap these
colors, the trapping engine adjusts (slides) the trap position from spreading the lighter color into the darker
one by straddling the centerline between them. A sliding trap prevents abrupt shifts in trap placement, for
example, along a gradient edge. Gradients are also known as blends, degradées, or vignettes.

a. b.
Figure 5a: A gradient touching a solid color can cause traps to shift abruptly.
Figure 5b: Using a sliding trap creates a gradual centerline trap.

Trap Join Styles


In September 2000, Adobe released a new version of Adobe in-RIP Trapping—Version 305. This release is
based on an entirely new Adobe Trap Engine. Version 305 includes a number of powerful new features, as
well as, continued performance improvements. One of these new features is the ability to select a different
trap join style.
A trap join is the shape the outside edge of the trap makes when it joins another trap. Different trap join
styles may be used depending on the printing conditions, the type of ink, or the substrate being used. In
Adobe in-RIP Trapping 305, the following trap join styles are available: miter, round, or bevel. If no trap join
style is selected, the default trap join style—miter will be used, in order to ensure compatibility with previous
versions of Adobe trapping products. Earlier versions of Adobe in-RIP Trapping, only supported miter trap
join styles.

Figure 6a: Miter trap join. Figure 6b: Round trap join. Figure 6c: Bevel trap join.

Trap End Styles


Trap End Styles is another new feature supported in Adobe in-RIP Trapping 305. A trap end style is a trapping
parameter that specifies how the Adobe Trapping Engine forms the intersection of a trap. Version 305 sup-
ports two different types of trap end styles—miter and overlap. In a miter trap end style, the end of the trap
keeps away from the trap intersection. In an overlap trap end style, the lightest trap is wrapped around the
intersection.
7

Like trap join styles, different trap end styles may be used depending on the printing conditions, the type of
ink, or the substrate being used. For example, a miter trap end style may be used in lithographic printing
and an overlap trap end style may be used in flexographic printing. If no trap end style is selected, the trap
end style—miter will be used, in order to ensure compatibility with pervious versions of Adobe trapping
products. Earlier versions of Adobe in-RIP Trapping, only supported miter trap end styles.

Figure 7a: Miter trap end. Figure 7b: Overlap trap end.

Trapping Thin Areas


Another benefit with Adobe trapping technology is the ability to shape traps in thin areas. Some trapping
products can create undesirable traps in thin areas. This is due to their lack of ability to limit trap thickness
(trap width) in thin areas. The Adobe Trapping Engine limits the traps in thin areas to either the trap width
specified or to 50 percent of the distance between the two boundaries of the thin areas,—whichever is
smaller. The resulting trap is more desirable, because the trap never extends beyond the opposite boundary
of the thin area.

Figure 8a: Undesirable results from trapping a thin area.

Figure 8b: Desirable results from trapping a thin area.

Advanced gradient processing


Adobe trapping technology will not trap the tint steps within a gradient because it requires at least 5 percent
minimum difference between color areas before it will begin trapping. To avoid unnecessary analysis of each
color boundary within a gradient, the trapping engine recognizes the objects that match the definition of
gradients and treats them as a single, composite object. By avoiding this unnecessary analysis, object-to-
object color analysis performance is greatly enhanced, and unneeded traps within gradients are avoided.
Advanced gradient processing improves the quality and speed of both PostScript 3 smooth-shaded blends
and legacy PostScript gradients.
Late-binding workflow
One of the greatest enhancements of the Adobe trapping workflow is the flexibility it gives users to make
last-minute changes. Trapping is a uniquely device-specific process. By executing trap instructions in the
PostScript RIP, users are not committed to device-specific instructions until they are ready to image the
document. If users need to change the trap specification, they can apply new trap styles to the entire docu-
ment rather than applying new trap settings to individual elements.
Furthermore, the PDF Trapper allows users to view traps that have been stored in a special annotation of a
PDF document after the interpretation process. In this workflow, traps can be viewed, edited, stored, or even
deleted before the file is imaged to the output device.
8

Conclusions
The Adobe trapping technology that is currently available in Adobe in-RIP trapping and the Adobe PDF
Trapper is one of the most robust product offerings for trapping available today. This full-featured trapping
technology offers a flexible, automated, and distributed workflow that produces quality traps. With imple-
mentations of this technology in both Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe Extreme, this all-digital trapping
workflow supports both composite PostScript files and PDF. By continuing to provide a family of solutions
around the same trapping technology and utilizing a consistent user-interface, Adobe offers the assurance of
consistent results regardless of the specific workflow.
Several Adobe licensing partners are shipping Adobe in-RIP trapping solutions. They include Agfa Bayer
Corporation; Autologic Information International Inc.; FUJIFILM Electronics Imaging; IPTech;
RIPit Computer Corporation; and Xitron, Inc. Adobe is working with OEM and ISV partners to develop
additional products incorporating Adobe trapping technology.

For additional information on Adobe PostScript 3 and Adobe Extreme licensing partners, please refer to the
Adobe Web site at www.adobe.com.

Glossary
Adobe PostScript 3 is the latest version of Adobe’s page description language used for document printing.
Adobe Extreme is the most advanced version of Adobe PostScript offering a fast, flexible, scalable, and pro-
ductive printing architecture for the graphic arts and production printing environment. Extreme accepts
both PostScript and PDF, but uses PDF as its internal file format and PJTF as the control mechanism.
PDF is an abbreviation for Portable Document Format. PDF files are created in Adobe Acrobat software.
They are used to represent a document in a manner independent of the application software, platform, and
operating system used to create it.
PJTF is an abbreviation for Adobe’s Portable Job Ticket Format. PJTF is a format based on PDF that de-
scribes the device-specific printing parameters of a PDF document, including trapping parameters. A Por-
table Job Ticket can reside within a PDF document or as a stand-alone file.

Adobe Systems Incorporated


345 Park Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110-2704 USA
Adobe Systems Pty. Ltd.
Level 4, 67 Albert Avenue
Chatswood, NSW 2047
Australia
Adobe Systems Europe Limited
Adobe House, Mid New Cultins
Edinburgh EH11 4DU
Scotland, United Kingdom
Adobe Systems Co., Ltd.
Yebisu Garden Place Tower This brochure was created with Adobe PageMaker software and font software from the Adobe Type Library.
4-20-3 Ebisu, Shibuya-ku
Tokyo 150-6017 Japan Adobe, the Adobe logo, Acrobat, Acrobat, Extreme, Illustrator, InDesign, InProduction, PageMaker, Photoshop, PostScript, and PostScript 3 are trademarks of Adobe Systems
Incorporated. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
World Wide Web
www.adobe.com © 2000 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. BC1270 10/00

S-ar putea să vă placă și