ISSN(Online): 2320-9801

ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

Design Simulation Analysis and Comparison

of 2-Way Wilkinson Power Divider with
Different Topologies
Kajol Jain1 , Abhishek Singh2
1,
M.Tech Research Scholar [Embedded System & VLSI Design], Dept. of ETE, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology &
Sciences, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
2
Asst. Professor, Dept. of ETE, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology & Sciences, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India

ABSTRACT: This paper presents 2 way Wilkinson power divider (WPD) on microstrip line proposed designed and
analysed for 650 MHz operating frequency. This Wilkinson power divider use elliptical as well as circular split design.
First an optimized 2 way elliptical splitWilkinson power divider is designed and the output response of this power
divider needs to be improved for equal and unequal both type of Wilkinson power divider applications. Then a circular
split designWilkinson power divider is presented that yields acceptable input and output responses for equal and
unequal Wilkinson power divider. This study shows the improvement of output simulation responses, this WPD have a
better isolation and insertion loss, and also give a better return loss of input and output ports for operating frequency at
650 MHz.All simulations are carried out by AWR simulator.

KEYWORDS: Wilkinson power divider(WPD), elliptical splitWilkinson power divider, circular split Wilkinson
power divider,Advancing the wireless revolution (AWR)

I. INTRODUCTION
Power divider and combiner is passive device that divide RF input power among several output and vice versa. The
power divider and power combiner are very popular components for a microwave power combining system. High
power solid state RF power divider/combiner are essential due to modest power of solid state devices. As such, most of
the popular powers combining schemes have emerged from communication system requirement; generally, a passive
power divider can work as a power combiner without any modification due to the reciprocity Hence concepts
developed for the power divider equally applies to a combiner. In case of power division, an input signal is divided
into two (or more) output signals of lesser power, while a power combiner as name suggests do reverse operation and
combines them at an output port. Power dividers usually provide equal and unequal power division ratio. In many
applications, there is a need to use microstrip Wilkinson power divider with unequal power division ratio. However, for
the unequal Wilkinson power divider with high power dividing ratio,the characteristic impedance of one of the
microstrip lines becomes high.

Figure 1 Basic Diagram of Power Divider/Combiner

II. RELATED WORK

The most popular and widely adopted power combining structure was proposed by E.J. Wilkinson in, 1960 and it is
consequently referred to as Wilkinson splitter/combiner.Up to now, many new power dividers are still being proposed.

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11345

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

These can reduce the dimensions of the divider and have a better return loss, insertion loss and isolation.In [1] author
designs a 4:1 unequal Wilkinson power divider using a microstrip. The conventional Wilkinson topology is used for
design with the defected ground structure (DGS) which can obtain the 4:1 power dividing ratio easily without any
problem. Author in [2] investigated different type of microwave combining techniques like chain and tree combining
and n-way combining structures. In the work of [3] focus of author was on the design, fabrication, and testing of
feeding the networks individually and within an array system. In the design of Wilkinson power divider, three
topologies, viz. straight split section, a circular split section, and an elliptical split section for the quarter-lambda split
transmission line section were discussed. The elliptical split transmission line design results the most reduced size, but
was rejected, due to close spacing of the lines did not allow themselves to be sufficiently decoupled from each other,
and the circular and straight line quarter lambda split sections are designed, analysed and compared from simulation
results. Ansoft HFSS simulator is used to compare these two topologies by simulation results.Another scheme was
presented in [4] a uniform asymmetrical microstrip coupled lines was introduced to overcome the narrow strip width in
unequal Wilkinson power divider with high dividing ratio. A comprehensive analytical design scheme is given in [5];
author has generalized unequal Wilkinson power divider operating at dual-frequency. Here, the parallel and series RLC
structures are chosen to obtain effective isolation between the two output ports according to different operating
frequencies. Paper [6] presents design and fabrication of 2way Wilkinson power divider (WPD) for dual operating
Frequencies; 2.4GHz and 4.928GHz. This power divider has two branches of impedance transformer and parallel
connection at the output ports of this divider with RLC lumped element.The report [7] discusses both equal and
unequal power split cases. That is a power division ratio of 1:1, 3:2, 2:1 are discussed here. The circuits of 3 ports
Wilkinson power divider are analysed by the author to reduce the size of it by replacing the λ/4 transmission line with a
compact stepped impedance transmission line using even and odd mode analysis. The results show that matching at all
the ports are good. And good isolation between output ports is achieved at designed frequencies.
Here, we describe a new topology to design power divider. The analysis of Wilkinson power divider and comparison
between Both topologies elliptical as well as circular split design are also presented. To demonstrate that circular split
design of Wilkinson circuit has a good performance in the equal, unequal both case, the proposed Wilkinson power
divider has been analysed and simulated. The simulated results indicate reasonable agreement with the designed results.

III. PROPOSED ALGORITHM

Figure 2 Design Step for Simulation Of RF Power Dividers

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11346

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE DESIGN ALGORITHM

Aim of the proposed algorithm is to Design simulate analyse and compare of 2-Way Wilkinson Power Divider with
different topologies; elliptical as well as circular split design. Two design topologies were simulated for the equal and
1:2 unequal WPD by, the elliptical split design and circular split design section. The design algorithm is consists of
three main steps.
Steps to be followed:
1) Design the power divider for the power division ratio K2 using design formula.
2) Calculate the Physical length and width of each microstrip line
3) Construct circuit and measure the performance parameters such as Input Return loss
Insertion loss to port – 2 Insertion loss to port – 3, Isolation between two output ports

V. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A. TWO WAY EQUAL POWER DIVIDERS
STEP 1:- Calculation of Equal Power Divider
(i)
K2 = 1/1 , K=1
(ii)
Z02 = Z03 , Z02 = Z03 = 70.71ohm
(iii)
R = 100 ohm
Where:-
K = Coupling factor
Z02 =impedance of port 2,Z03=impedance of port 3
STEP 2:- Calculation Of Width And Length Of Microstrip
AWR provides a TXLINE Calc utility to calculate the width, w and length, l in mm, according to your specifications.
Using TXLINE Calc:
For Z0=50 Ohm, at λ/4 W= 7.2 mm, L= 69.39 mm
For Z= √2Z0=70.71 Ohm at λ/4 W= 3.9 mm, L= 71.08 mm

STEP 3:-Follow the Design Procedure

SCHEMATIC DESIGN
MCURVE
ID=TL1 MSTEP MLIN
W=3.9 mm ID=TL13
ID=TL3
W=7.2 mm PORT
EXTRACT ANG=180 Deg
ID=EX2 R=6 mm W1=3.9 mm
L=2 mm P=2
EM_Doc="EM_Extract_Doc" W2=7.2 mm
Name="EM_Extract"
MLIN Z=50 Ohm
ID=TL5
Simulator=EMSight
W=3.9 mm
X_Cell_Size=0.1 mm
L=25 mm
Y_Cell_Size=0.1 mm
PortType=Default MCURVE
MBEND EXTRACT
STACKUP="SUB3"
ID=MS3 MSTEP MLIN ID=TL1
Extension=2.5 mm
W=3.9 mm
ID=EX1 MBEND
Override_Options=Yes ID=TL15 ID=TL7 PORT W=3.9 mm
ANG=90 Deg W1=7.2 mm W=7.2 mm P=1 EM_Doc="EM_Extract_Doc" ID=MS3
Hierarchy=Off ANG=180 Deg
M=0 W2=3.9 mm L=5 mm Z=50 Ohm Name="EM_Extract"
MSUB=SUB1 W=3.9 mm
MLIN Simulator=EMSight STACKUP R=21 mm
ID=TL4 ANG=90 Deg
X_Cell_Size=0.1 mm Name=SUB2
W=3.9 mm M=0
L=32.52 mm Y_Cell_Size=0.1 mm MLIN MSUB=SUB1
PortType=Default ID=TL2
STACKUP="" W=3.9 mm
STACKUP 1 MTEE Extension=2.54 mm MLIN L=5.14 mm
PORT1
Name=SUB3 P=3 ID=TL10 Override_Options=Yes ID=TL8
3 W1=3.9 mm Hierarchy=Off
Z=50 Ohm W=7.2 mm
Pwr=40 dBm W2=3.9 mm MTEE
2 W3=3.9 mm L=2 mm 1
PORT1 ID=TL11
MSUB=SUB1
P=1 3 W1=3.9 mm
Z=50 Ohm W2=3.9 mm
MSUB 2
Pwr=40 dBm W3=7.2 mm
MLIN
ID=TL3
Er=3.5
MSUB W=3.9 mm H=3.2 mm MLIN
Er=3.5 L=32.52 mm T=.035 mm ID=TL4
MBEND
H=3.2 mm
ID=MS1
MSTEP MLIN PORT Rho=1 W=3.9 mm MBEND
T=.035 mm ID=TL9 ID=TL8
Rho=1
W=3.9 mm P=2 Tand=.002 L=5.14 mm ID=MS1
W1=7.2 mm W=7.2 mm Z=50 Ohm
ANG=90 Deg ErNom=3.5
Tand=.002
M=0
W2=3.9 mm L=5 mm W=3.9 mm
ErNom=3.5
MSUB=SUB1
Name=SUB1 ANG=90 Deg
Name=SUB1
M=0
MLIN MSUB=SUB1 MSTEP MLIN
MCURVE PORT
ID=TL6
W=3.9 mm ID=TL9 ID=TL15 ID=TL14 P=3
MCURVE W1=3.9 mmW=7.2 mm
ID=TL2
L=25 mm W=3.9 mm Z=50 Ohm
W=3.9 mm ANG=180 Deg W2=7.2 mmL=2 mm
ANG=180 Deg R=21 mm
R=6 mm

Figure 3 Schematic Diagram Of Equal (A) Elliptical And (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11347

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

EM LAYOUT

1
2

3
1
2
3

Figure 4 EM Layout Of Equal (A) Elliptical And (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider.

S PARAMETER PHASE
0 -99.4
650 MHz
-3.095 dB
DB(|S(3,3)|) 650 MHz
-99.41357 Deg
Ang(S(2,3)) (Deg)
EM_Extract_Doc -99.41 EM_Extract_Doc
-5 DB(|S(2,3)|) -99.42 Ang(S(1,3)) (Deg)
EM_Extract_Doc EM_Extract_Doc
-99.43
DB(|S(1,3)|)
-10 EM_Extract_Doc -99.44

-99.45
650 MHz
-17.71 dB -99.46
-15
650 MHz
-99.47 -99.47703 Deg

-20 -99.48
649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325 649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325
Frequency (MHz) Frequency (MHz)
.

EM SIMULATION PHASE
0 -94.7
650 MHz
650 MHz DB(|S(1,1)|) Ang(S(2,1)) (Deg)
-3.066 dB
-94.702 -94.70097 Deg
EM_Extract_Doc EM_Extract_Doc
-94.704
650 MHz
-5 -5.204 dB DB(|S(2,1)|)
-94.706
EM_Extract_Doc Ang(S(3,1)) (Deg)
-94.708 EM_Extract_Doc
DB(|S(3,1)|)
-10
EM_Extract_Doc -94.71

-94.712
DB(|S(3,2)|)
EM_Extract_Doc -94.714
-15
-94.716 650 MHz
-94.7164 Deg
650 MHz DB(|S(2,3)|)
-19.64 dB EM_Extract_Doc -94.718
-20 -94.72
649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325 649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325
Frequency (MHz) Frequency (MHz)

Figure 5: Graph of Equal (A) Elliptical and (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider.

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11348

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

This divider is simulated using AWR simulators. Graphs shows the obtained scattering parameters achieved over the
frequency of 650 MHz. An input return loss better than -20 dB is obtained over a frequency of 650 MHz. Moreover, the
coupling coefficient equals to -3dB.

SIMULATION RESULTS OF EQUAL ELLIPTICAL SPLIT DESIGN VERSUS CIRCULAR SPLIT DESIGN
The following graph show the simulation result of return loss and insertion loss of elliptical as well as circular split
equal power divider. From the graph, it is observed that circular split equal WPD return loss is highly desirable and the
insertion loss is low when compared with elliptical split equal WPD. Figure (a),(b) shows the return loss of about -
17.71dB and -19.64dB respectively.

ELLIPTICAL SPLIT DESIGN CIRCULAR SPLIT DESIGN

S PARAMETER SIMULATION RESULT S PARAMETER SIMULATION RESULT
650 MHz MAGNITUDE(dB) PHASE (Deg) 650 MHz MAGNITUDE (dB) PHASE (Deg)
S33 -17.71 dB S11 -19.64 dB
S23 -3.095 dB -99.410 S21 -3.066 dB 94.7000

S13 -3.095 dB -99.470 S31 -3.066 dB 94.7160

B. 1:2 UNEQUAL POWER DIVIDER

STEP 1:- Calculation and Simulation of 1:2 Unequal Power Divider

K2 = 1/2
K = .7071
Z02 = Z03 K2 , Z02 = 51.48
1+𝑘 2
Z03 = Z0 Z = 102.99
𝑘 3 , 03
R = Z0 (K+1/K), R = 106.06
R02= Z0K, R02= 35.35
R03= Z0/K, R03= 70.71
Where:K = Coupling factor,Z02 =impedance of port 2,Z03 =impedance of port 3,R02 = resistance of port 2,R03 =
resistance of port 3

STEP 2:- Calculation of Width and Length of Microstrip:-

AWR to calculate the width, w and length, l in mm, according to our specifications. Using TXLINE Calc:
For Z0=50 Ohm, at λ/4 W=7.2 mm, L= 69.39mm
For Z02= Z03 K2=51.48 Ohm at λ/4 W= 6.84 mm, L= 69.52mm
1+𝑘 2
For Z03= Z0 = 102.99 Ohm at λ/4 W= 1.64 mm, L= 72.87 mm
𝑘3

STEP 3:-Follow the Design Procedure

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11349

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

SCHEMATIC DESIGN:-

MCURVE
ID=TL1
EXTRACT W=9.4 mm
ID=EX1 ANG=180 Deg MSTEP MSTEP MLIN
EM_Doc="EM_Extract_Doc" MBEND ID=TL21 MLIN ID=TL13
R=5 mm ID=TL6 ID=TL7 PORT
Name="EM_Extract" MLIN ID=MS3 W1=9.4 mm W=7.2 mm
ID=TL6 EXTRACT W=6.8 mm W2=6.8 mm W=9.4 mm W1=7.2 mm L=3.6 mm P=2
Simulator=EMSight ANG=90 Deg L=68.6 mm W2=9.4 mm Z=50 Ohm
W=9.4 mm ID=EX1
X_Cell_Size=0.1 mm MSTEP EM_Doc="EM_Extract_Doc" MCURVE M=0
Y_Cell_Size=0.1 mm ID=TL12 L=47 mm MSUB=SUB1
Name="EM_Extract" ID=TL1
PortType=Default W1=9.4 mm Simulator=EMSight W=6.8 mm
MBEND
STACKUP="" W2=6.8 mm X_Cell_Size=0.1 mm ANG=180 Deg
ID=MS3 MLIN PORT Y_Cell_Size=0.1 mm R=20 mm
Extension=2.54 mm MSTEP MLIN
W=9.4 mm ID=TL7 P=2 PortType=Default
Override_Options=Yes ID=TL16 ID=TL13
ANG=90 Deg W=9.4 mm Z=50 Ohm STACKUP=""
Hierarchy=Off W1=9.4 mm W=7.2 mm Extension=2.54 mm MLIN
MLIN M=0 L=6 mm
MSUB=SUB1 W2=7.2 mm L=2 mm Override_Options=Yes ID=TL2
ID=TL5 Hierarchy=Off W=6.8 mm
W=6.8 mm MLIN L=6.8 mm
L=69.5 mm ID=TL8
PORT1 W=7.2 mm
MLIN PORT1
L=2 mm 1
STACKUP P=1 ID=TL8 STACKUP P=1 MTEE
Z=50 Ohm Name=SUB2 Z=50 Ohm 3 ID=TL11
Name=SUB2 W=7.2 mm
Pwr=40 dBm 1 Pwr=40 dBm W1=6.8 mm
L=10 mm MTEE 2
W2=1.6 mm
3
ID=TL11 W3=7.2 mm
W1=6.8 mm MLIN
2
W2=1.6 mm ID=TL4
W3=7.2 mm MSUB W=1.6 mm
Er=3.5 L=10.1 mm
H=3.2 mm
T=0.035 mm MCURVE
MBEND MLIN MSTEP MLIN Rho=1 ID=TL9
MSUB ID=MS1 PORT
ID=TL2 ID=TL15 ID=TL14 Tand=0.002 W=1.6 mm
Er=3.5 MLIN W=5.4 mm P=3 ANG=180 Deg
W=5.4 mm W1=7.2 mm W=7.2 mm ErNom=3.5
H=3.2 mm ID=TL3 ANG=90 Deg Z=50 Ohm Name=SUB1 R=20 mm
L=8 mm W2=5.4 mm L=2 mm
T=.035 mm W=1.6 mm M=0 MBEND
Rho=1 L=57.2 mm MSUB=SUB1 ID=MS1
Tand=0 W=1.6 mm
ANG=90 Deg MLIN MSTEP MLIN PORT
ErNom=3.5 P=3
Name=SUB1 MSTEP MLIN M=0 ID=TL3 ID=TL15 ID=TL14
MSTEP
ID=TL10 ID=TL4 MSUB=SUB1 W=5.4 mm W1=7.2 mm W=7.2 mm Z=50 Ohm
MCURVE ID=TL5
W1=5.4 mm L=70.2 mm W2=5.4 mm L=4.6 mm
ID=TL9 W=5.4 mm W1=5.4 mm
W=1.6 mm W2=1.6 mm L=62.2 mm W2=1.6 mm
ANG=180 Deg
R=5 mm

Figure6: Schematic Diagram of 1:2 Unequal (A) Elliptical and (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider

EM LAYOUT:

3
1

2
1

Figure 7: EM Layout of 1:2 Unequal (A) Elliptical and (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider.

S PARAMETER PHASE
0 170.3
650 MHz
650 MHz DB(|S(1,1)|) 170.2754 Deg
-1.815 dB
EM_Extract_Doc Ang(S(2,1)) (Deg)
EM_Extract_Doc
650 MHz
-5 -5.002 dB DB(|S(2,1)|)
650 MHz EM_Extract_Doc 170.25
-7.55 dB
DB(|S(3,1)|) Ang(S(3,1)) (Deg)
-10 EM_Extract_Doc
EM_Extract_Doc

DB(|S(3,2)|) 170.2
-15 EM_Extract_Doc
650 MHz
-17.14 dB DB(|S(2,3)|) 650 MHz
EM_Extract_Doc 170.1514 Deg

-20 170.15
649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325 649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325
Frequency (MHz) Frequency (MHz)

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11350

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

S PARAMETER PHASE
0 176.5 650 MHz
650 MHz DB(|S(1,1)|)
-1.681 dB 176.484 Deg
EM_Extract_Doc Ang(S(2,1)) (Deg)
650 MHz EM_Extract_Doc
-5 -5.035 dB
650 MHz DB(|S(2,1)|)
-6.967 dB EM_Extract_Doc 176
-10 DB(|S(3,1)|) Ang(S(3,1)) (Deg)
EM_Extract_Doc EM_Extract_Doc

-15 DB(|S(3,2)|) 175.5

EM_Extract_Doc

-20 DB(|S(2,3)|)
EM_Extract_Doc
175
-25
650 MHz 650 MHz
-29.06 dB 174.612 Deg
-30 174.5
649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325 649.9675 649.9875 650.0075 650.0275650.0325
Frequency (MHz) Frequency (MHz)

Figure 8: Graph of 1:2 Unequal (A) Elliptical and (B) Circular Spilt Power Divider
The results of the project were in agreement to the theoretical available results, so the various S parameters were
plotted as shown above.The circuit’s main S-parameters were plotted S11,S12,S23 and S31. These indicate matching,
power division, and port isolation, respectively.

SIMULATION RESULTS OF UNEQUAL ELLIPTICAL SPLIT DESIGN VERSUS CIRCULAR SPLIT

DESIGN

Table1 gives the performance analysis of circular split unequal WPD over elliptical split unequal WPD on the basis of
insertion loss and return loss at the operating frequency. Elliptical split unequal WPD return loss is measured of about -
17.14dB whereas circular split unequal WPD return loss is measured about 29.06dB. Hence the return loss of circular
split unequal WPD is found to be lower about -17.14dB when compared with elliptical split unequal WPD.

ELLIPTICAL SPLIT DESIGN CIRCULAR SPLIT DESIGN

S PARAMETER SIMULATION RESULT SIMULATION RESULT
650 MHz MAGNITUDE (dB) PHASE (Deg) MAGNITUDE (dB) PHASE (Deg)
S11 -17.14 dB -29.06 dB
S21 -1.815 dB 170.20 -1.681 dB 174.60
S31 -5.002 dB 170.10 -5.035 dB 174.40

VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper, the performance comparison of elliptical split design and circular split design are analysed in terms of
return loss, coupling and isolation loss with the operating frequency of 650 MHz. The simulation result shows the
reduction of losses between the two dividers using AWR microwave simulator. Thus, we conclude that circular split
design overcomes the limitations and has better performance when compared to elliptical split design. Hence the
circular split design is advantageous over elliptical split design.

REFERENCES

1) Jong-Sik Lim, Sung-Won Lee, Chul-Soo Kim, Jun-Seok Park, Dal Ahn, and Sangwook Nam” A 4 : 1 Unequal Wilkinson Power Divider” IEEE
microwave and wireless components letters, vol. 11, no. 3, march 2001
2) Kenneth j. Russell “Microwave Power Combining Techniques” IEEE transactions on microwaves theory and techniques, vol. Mtt-27, no. 5,
may 1979

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11351

 ISSN(Online): 2320-9801
ISSN (Print): 2320-9798

International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer

and Communication Engineering
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)

Vol. 3, Issue 11, November 2015

3) Daniel D. Harty “Novel Design of a Wideband Ribcage-Dipole Array and Its Feeding Network” worcester polytechnic institute December
17th2010.
4) Mahdi Moradian and Majid Tayarani“Unequal Wilkinson Power Divider Using Asymmetric Microstrip Parallel Coupled Lines” Department of
Electrical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and
Technology,Tehran, Iran Progress In electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 36, 2013
5) Y. Wu, Y. Liu, and S. Li “An Unequal Dual-Frequency Wilkinson Power Divider With Optional Isolation Structure” School of Electronic
EngineeringBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications Beijing, China Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 91, 393–411,
2009
6) Taufiqqurrachman and Mashury Wahab “Design and Fabrication of 2-Way Wilkinson Power Divider for Dual Operating Frequencies”
Research Center for Electronics and Telecommunications Indonesian Institute of Sciences (PPET -LIPI) UPI Campus, Sangkuriang Street,
Building 20, 4th floors, Bandung 40135 – Indonesia 2014 IEEE
7) RohithSoman “New Wilkinson Power Divider Based on Compact Stepped-Impedance Transmission Lines and Shunt Open Stubs” registered
for M.E. and are affiliated to Electrical and Communication Engineering Department

BIOGRAPHY

Kajol Jain is a Master of Technology, Research Scholar in Embedded System & VLSI Design, Gyan Ganga Institute
of Technology & Sciences Jabalpur.

Abhishek Singh is an Asst. Professor, Gyan Ganga Institute of Technology & Sciences, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh,
India

Copyright to IJIRCCE DOI: 10.15680/IJIRCCE.2015. 0311212 11352