1 2 Concern 4 Concern Growth Stalls 3 5 1. Our earnings growth rate has outstripped our revenue growth rate for five or more years. 2. Cost-cutting and/or productivity improvements account for more than 50 percent of our year-on- year earnings growth. 3. More than 50 percent of our revenues derive from “formula roll-out” businesses that are five years old or more. 4. [If publicly held] Our firm’s PEG rate (price/earnings to growth) is 1.0 or under. 5. Our core business reinvestment rate (R&D + CAPX + advertising divided by revenue) falls below its historic range. 6. We rely on acquisitions to meet current-year revenue growth targets. 7. Our dividend payout ratio exceeds 30 percent. 8. Our revenue projections for our three- to five-year planning horizon do not explicitly link back to our one- to three-year operational plan. 9. We have no formal corporate-level strategic planning function. 10. Our strategic planning function’s budget and staff are in multiyear decline. 11. Time and resources meant to be allocated to long- term strategy and top-line growth drivers are routinely diverted to annual planning and near-term earnings concerns. 12. Our core assumptions and beliefs about the marketplace and about the capabilities that are critical to support our strategy are not codified or otherwise written down. 13. Major issues relating to our strategy are “off the table” for consideration; executives have intimated that dissent is unacceptable. 14. We haven’t revisited our core market definition (and, therefore, our list of relevant competitors and calculation of our market share) in several years. 15. We have not revisited or refreshed our overall company performance metrics in the past two to four years. 16. We describe our core market as “mature”—a source of earnings or cash flow; growth comes elsewhere. 17. We are not actively exploring new business models within our existing core businesses. 18. Our organizational structure hinders us when we need to adapt quickly to an external market or competitive development. 19. We test only infrequently for shifts in key customer groups’ valuation of product or service attributes. 20. Key customers are increasingly unwilling to pay a premium for brand reputation or superior performance. 21. Our executives lack effective (immersive, experiential, or otherwise visceral) mechanisms to directly engage with emerging customer and product trends. 22. We do not formally track the trajectory of emerging technologies with the potential to disrupt our core businesses. 23. We do not track customer perceptions of the quality differential between our offerings and those of low- end and emerging competitors. 24. New entrants with new business models or disruptive technologies are garnering an accelerating share of the total market value of all companies in our sector. 25. Market research and R&D do not have close, regular coordination of their activities and agendas. 26. We are less effective than our competitors at translating customer insights into new product and service categories. 27. We’ve recently cut our R&D budget well below its historical range and below that of competitors. 28. We lack adequate visibility into the business unit– level R&D bets being made across the company. 29. R&D spending is so decentralized that we struggle to direct sufficient resources to significant opportunities for differentiation and growth. 30. We view many market opportunities as "subscale": our R&D shop and innovation processes are geared for larger, more complex customer problems and opportunities. 31. We are terminating too many product or service initiatives because their “time to material impact” is too long. 32. Too many of our new product or service introductions fail to achieve expected returns, due to volume and/or pricing shortfalls. 33. We have not been able to synchronize our internal innovation cycle with the requirements of the external marketplace. 34. More than 70 percent of our sales are dependent on a single, dominant distribution channel. 35. More than 25 percent of the sales growth in our industry over the past three years is through a product/service category or distribution channel we do not currently utilize. 36. We are largely unable to self-cannibalize existing revenue streams in favor of new products and services. 37. Our new product and/or service sales are slowed by housing them within existing business units. 38. We have a stated or unstated bias to promote from within that disadvantages highly qualified external candidates. 39. Our formal HR systems (e.g., job descriptions, competency models, and promotion criteria) lag our emerging strategic and operational requirements. 40. In identifying our high-potential employees (HIPOs), we overweight current business model competencies and underweight required future competencies. 41. Employee engagement scores (or other proxy for employee commitment) for our most critical talent groups are low and/or declining. 42. Our future success is highly dependent on the continued productivity and contribution of a core group of specialized, hard-to-replace employees. 43. More than 60 percent of our senior leaders have twenty or more years’ tenure with the company. 44. Our leadership team has been stable for many years; all but a few members of the group have worked together now for years—if not decades. 45. We are not effective at recruiting/on- boarding/retaining senior hires with new skill sets and profiles. 46. Our CEO has such force of presence and influence that his or her views on strategy tend to discourage discussion and debate. 47. Our board does not include strategy challenge and assumption-testing in the list of risks it manages. 48. Our board considers only financial objectives, and not attainment of strategy goals, in performance management and incentive schemes for senior management. 49. Our board lacks sufficient market knowledge and diversity of experience to challenge our strategy. 50. We do not actively identify and manage gaps between our stakeholders’ expectations and their current perceptions of our operations, policies, products and markets. www.stallpoints.executiveboard.com
The Effects of Emotional Intelligence Towards Leadership of A Tech-Voc Travel Services Students of University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue - Copy Clements Group