09:30 OPENING OF CONFERENCE

PLENARY SESSION -
Engineering Simulation as Viewed from the Boardroom
Robert Joyce, Robert Joyce
Recently Retired Ex Group Engineering Director and Executive CTEE Member at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR)

Modelling, Analyses & Simulation: The Link with Artificial Intelligence to improve Design for Manufacturing & Services
Phill Cartwright, CFMS

11:15 REFRESHMENT BREAK

1A - ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING 1B - ELECTRIC VEHICLES 1C - SOLVER METHODS 1D - DISCUSSION SESSION

Tyler London, TWI
Meeting the End-to-End Process Challenges of Additive
Manufacturing with a Platform Approach
Stuart Nixon, Dassault Systèmes
The Simulation of Residual Stress and Mechanical
Performance of EBM-Manufactured Titanium Test
Specimens
Akash Gupta, CBM
Fast Charging - An Attractive Option for EVs Owners
with Range Anxiety
Marco Buonfiglioli, Siemens PLM Software
Thermal Management System Design, Simulation and
Optimisation of Air Conditioning Systems for Plug in
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Richard Merrett, Mentro
3D Beam Elements Abstracted from 3D Solids FE Models with Shear Analysis Planning & Simulation Data
Corrction Management, Complementary Techniques to
Ian McLuckie, AIES Ltd. Assure Confidence in Simulation Results
Althea de Souza, Quesada Solutions Ltd.
Towards Industrial LES using High Order Discontinuous Galerkin
Method
Andrei Cimpoeru, CFMS Services

Simulation of the Stress Concentration around Pores in Vibro-Acoustic Analysis of a Permanent Magnet Comparison and Validation of Non-linear Flexible
3D Printed Components Machine for Electrical Vehicles Rear Beam Axle in a Multi Body Systems Model
Karl-Michael Nigge, Volume Graphics GmbH Gaurav Kumar, Siemens PLM Software Peter Delves, Dassault Systèmes

12:55 LUNCH

PLENARY SESSION -
13:45 Envisioning Product Creation in the Coming Intelligence / Hyper-Connectivity / Mass Customization Era
Ahmed Noor, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.

Making the Digital Twin Real: Challenges for Simulation

Bill Dawes, University of Cambridge

2A - DIGITAL TWIN 2B - ACOUSTICS 2C - FATIGUE & FAILURE 2D - DISCUSSION SESSION

Amit Visrolia, National Composites Centre
On the Way to a Digital Prototype - Wish or Already Force Based Squeak and Rattle assessment in CEVT Effect of Mitigation on Partial Failure of Storage Tank Using Standardisation for Material Data Interfaces
Reality? vehicles interior Computational Fluid Dynamics in CAE Workflows’
Nils Wagner, INTES GmbH Athanasios Fokylidis, BETA CAE Systems Islem Megdiche, Liverpool John Moores University Gino Duffett, NAFEMS

In Support of the Digital Twin: A Geometric Paradigm to An Integrated Overview for Aero-acoustic Testing in Modelling of Double-Twisted Wire Mesh with Material Failure Criteria
Model Performance Degradation and Assess System Automotive Design Hassan Al-Budairi, University of Glasgow
Robustness Samson Cooper, Siemens Simcenter Solutions
Richard Evans, Cambridge Flow Solutions

Progressive Damage Model for Filament Wound Tubes

Tassos Mesogitis, National Composites Centre

15:20 REFRESHMENT BREAK

3A - SIMULATION FOR DESIGN ENGINEERS 3B - BIOMEDICAL 3C - WORKSHOP SESSION

John Verdicchio, Cambridge Flow Solutions
NAFEMS Publication - A Designers' Guide to CFD
Michael Clapp, 80/20 Engineering
Creating Simulation Ready Animal and Human Body Sheet Metal Formability Material Properties, Failure and Simulation -
Models from 3D Medical Image Data for Computational OnDemand Training Course Review
Modeling Trevor Dutton, Dutton Simulation
Rebecca Bryan, Synopsys

Enabling Non-Expert Users (Designers and Analysts) An Inverse Finite Element Methodology to Derive Non-

DAY 1
Across the Enterprise to Discover Better Designs, linearly Viscoelastic Material Properties
Faster by Automating Design Exploration Grigorios Grigoriadis, Imperial College London
Stephen Boot, Siemens Simulation & Test

17:00 END OF DAY 1

 PLENARY SESSION - Tim Morris, NAFEMS
08:45 Additive Manufacturing Technology: Enhancing Process Optimisation and Part Performance through Simulation
Tyler London, TWI Ltd

4A - OPTIMISATION 4B - SIMULATION SUPPORTED DESIGN 4C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM 4D - WORKSHOP SESSION

Bipin Patel, EnginSoft UK Ltd.
Applications and Limitations of Structural Optimisation
John Crew, Cummins Ltd.
CAB Cushion Shape Optimization Based on Genetic
Algorithm and Numerical Analysis
June Young Song, Hyundai Mobis
FE Model using Three Constitutive Soil Models to Test
Structural Performance of a New Design for Manhole
Buried in the Soil
Alaa Abbas, Liverpool John Moores University
Taking Simulation to the Next Level - Finite Element
Model and Engineer
Rodrygo Zanoni, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy /
Brunel Netherlands
Big Simulation – Future Issues How to Build and Manage Simulation Engineer
KEYNOTE PRESENTER: Jim Boyle, University of Strathclyde Competency
Nawal Prinja,
Technology Director (Nuclear), WOOD Plc
Equilibrium Finite Elements in the Education of Engineers
Angus Ramsay, Ramsay Maunder Associates Limited

10:25 REFRESHMENT BREAK

5A - NEXT LEVEL
Brian Miller, Wilde Analysis
Applying Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning for 3D
CAD model searches and classification
Peter Chow, Fujitsu Laboratories
Combined solid modelling and meshing to create a new
standard for CAD and CAE
Ian McLuckie, AIES Ltd.
5B - RENEWABLES
Minesto Deep Green - Optimisation of the Power
Takeoff System for a Novel Tidal Energy Device
Anthony Mosquera, Applied Computing & Engineering
Limited
Comparison of Different Techniques of Modelling an
ultra-low speed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
Ahmad Zakaria, Universiti Kuuala Lumpur
5C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM 5D - WORKSHOP SESSION
Simulation Education; Recognising Evolving Industry Requirements From Materials Testing through Stress Simulation
and Individual Needs when Dealing with Large Class Sizes and Experimental Validation
Declan Nolan, Queen's University Belfast
Andrew Halfpenny,
Director of Technology , HBMPrenscia
Virtual Engineers of the Future: Recognising and Nuturing Talent in
Undergraduate Degree Programmes
Lee Margetts, Manchester University

Fluid-Structure Interaction of a Rigid Wing for Minesto

Moving Simulation to the Cloud: Challenges and
Deep Green, a Tidal Wing Device
5C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION
Opportunities
Daniel Hung, Applied Computing & Engineering Limited Attracting and Retaining Women in Engineering Simulation
Steven Rossiter, AglieTek Engineering
Althea de Souza, Quesada Solutions Ltd.

12:00 LUNCH

PLENARY SESSION - Paul Newton, NAFEMS

13:00 Democratization of Simulation through Creation of a New Paradigm in Engineering Education by Combining Hands-on
Simulations and Online Learning
Rajesh Bhaskaran, Cornell University

6A - DYNAMICS 6B - THERMAL 6C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION 6D - WORKSHOP SESSION

Nils Wagner, INTES GmbH
A Model-based Design Methodology for Rapid
Preliminary Landing Gear Design
Elias Allegaert, Siemens PLM
Numerical Modeling of Acceleration Response of
Rockfall Catch Fences under Impact Loading
Hassan Al-Budairi, University of Glasgow
EV Drive-cycle Performance: Optimization and Thermal Current & Perceived Future Challenges in Engineering Simulation How to Demonstrate Design Code Compliance
Analysis Education using FEA
Markus Andres, Siemens Simcenter: HEEDS Jim Wood, JW Analysis Nawal Prinja,
Design and Simulation of Thermal Management Technology Director (Nuclear), WOOD Plc.
Solutions for Professional LED Luminaires
Tamas Deak, Philips Lighting Hungary Kft.6D -

14:40 REFRESHMENT BREAK

7A - CONNECTIONS 7B - AUTOMATION 7C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION
Paul Newton, NAFEMS
Contact Assembly Sequence Modelling Using Template Driven CFD Technology for Advanced How Can NAFEMS Provide Better Support to Academics & Students
Vijay Narayanan, Siemens PLM Automotive and Marine Applications in Engineering Simulation?
Sean Horgan, 80/20 Engineering Ltd. Jim Wood, JW Analysis
Bolt Preload Modeling Methods Automating the Structural Reliability Analysis of Trawl
Prabu Ravindren, Siemens PLM Software Inc. Pullover Using Isight
Arjun Rajkumar, Dassault Systèmes
Tribology Solutions for Fluid Lubricated Sliding
Bearings
Ian McLuckie, AIES Ltd.
Automatic Hexahedral Meshing for Structures using
the 3D Medial Axis
Shakeel Seebooa, International TechneGroup Ltd. DAY 2
PLENARY SESSION - CLOSING REMARKS
16:45 CLOSE OF CONFERENCE
DAY 1 DISCUSSIONS & WORKSHOPS
3C- WORKSHOP SESSION
Sheet Metal Formability Material Properties, Failure and Simulation - OnDemand Training Course Review
Trevor Dutton, Dutton Simulation
This workshop, led by Trevor Dutton, is an opportunity to review the proposed training material for a new OnDemand training
course on Sheet Metal Forming Simulation. The course is intended to assist those involved in the design of sheet metal
components to identify the key material properties and potential failure modes during manufacture. The course will
demonstrate how CAE methods can be used to simulate the manufacturing method in order to identify any potential problems
with the process.
During the one hour workshop, attendees will be encouraged to provide feedback on both the proposed technical content and
the method of delivery, helping to ensure that the final delivered course meets NAFEMS member expectations and
requirements.
1D - DISCUSSION SESSION
Analysis Planning & Simulation Data Management, Complementary Techniques to Assure Confidence in Simulation
Results
Althea de Souza, Quesada Solutions Ltd.
Essential steps in simulation governance for an analyst are to record what you plan to do to analyse an engineering problem
and then to record what you assumed, what you did, what you found and what you concluded. While this is stating the obvious,
consistent record keeping is essential for peer review, justification of results, quality compliance, subsequent further analyses
and building a knowledge base. However record keeping can be dull and time consuming and it’s easy to forget to record
assumptions which were obvious at the time but which may not be obvious three months or three years later. This can be a
significant barrier to the effective implementation of a Simulation Data Management (SDM) system, despite the wide ranging
benefits that such systems can provide. In this discussion, we invite you to consider how a simple approach can be effective in
developing simulation records that work for you and set the building blocks for a full SDM system in the future.
2D - DISCUSSION SESSION
Standardisation for Material Data Interfaces in CAE Workflows’
Gino Duffett, NAFEMS
The VMAP project (vmap.eu.com) aims to develop a standard for the transfer of material data within complex Computer Aided
Engineering (CAE) simulation workflows such as those found in virtual manufacturing simulation process and product design.
This workshop/discussion will enable interested parties to discuss their simulation process requirements, and the material
data transfer, with VMAP to enable the standardization process to be more open and far-reaching and encourage the
participation of more software vendors.
It would also enable contact with parties interested in playing a part in the open and vendor-neutral ‘Material Data Exchange
Interface Standard’ community that the project will create. This community will provide best-practice guidelines and will
ensure that standardisation efforts continue into the future.
DAY 2 DISCUSSIONS
5C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION
Attracting and Retaining Women in Engineering Simulation
Althea de Souza, Quesada Solutions Ltd.
We all know there is a shortage of simulation engineers in the UK. We have too few engineering graduates and they don't all
get jobs in engineering, let alone in simulation. We need to attract and retain more people and one group that continues to be
under-represented is women. Even when women become simulation engineers, they may not stay long term. Why is this and
how can the situation be improved? The biggest challenges are often around suitable role models, confidence, flexible working
patterns and returning after a career break. Come along and consider the role NAFEMS could play to address these issues and
others that arise.
6C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION
Current & Perceived Future Challenges in Engineering Simulation Education
Jim Wood, JW Analysis
We are keen to receive input from both industrialists and academics in this discussion session. Even if you can’t manage
along, we would be happy to accept your input before or after the event. The call presentations contains a wealth or relevant
topics. Meanwhile here are a few stimulating thoughts and questions …
• Do industrialists see any perceived shortcomings in new graduates in this area?
• Do industrialists feel that they have sufficient opportunity to influence University Programme/Course Committees?
• Has the design pendulum swung too far in general and are there any significant technical gaps?
• Interest in Validation of simulation remains strong, with emphasis on uncertainty quantification and comparison with
experimental test … do engineering degrees have these 2 areas and the necessary underpinning well covered?
• Will a significant move to on-line learning, for engineering degrees be welcomed, by industry and what are the challenges
that this might bring for academia?
• Where are the issues with respect to Computer-bases Assessment?
• What are the challenges of the internationalisation agenda for engineering simulation?
• Is articulation + credit accumulation and transfer, alive and well amongst UK Colleges and Universities?
• Is engineering education integrated, inclusive and representative or can we do better?
• Has UK education got the right focus now on the teaching agenda?
• Are teaching & research licenses from vendors value for money?
• Lessons from participation in “Grand Challenges”?
• The list is endless!
7C - ACADEMICS SYMPOSIUM: DISCUSSION SESSION
How Can NAFEMS Provide Better Support to Academics & Students in Engineering Simulation?
Jim Wood, JW Analysis
Participants in this discussion session are encouraged to bring along their thoughts on this broad topic. Please feel free to
provide your thoughts before or after the event. The call presentations contains a wealth or relevant topics. Meanwhile here
are a few stimulating thoughts and questions …
Should NAFEMS have a student membership?
Is NAFEMS “approval” of simulation modules in degree courses attractive, as well as providing an awareness to future
simulation engineers;
Can we make the NAFEMS annual final year project prize more attractive and how?
What kind of resource material from NAFEMS would/does academia find most useful …
• Text books (with or without supporting slide packs);
• Coursework/Case Studies for undergraduate use, presented within an industrial context;
• Benchmarks;
• Online self-learning learning courses;
• Access to webinar recordings;
• Provision of local guest lectures from NAFEMS industrial members?
DAY 2 WORKSHOPS
4D - WORKSHOP SESSION
How to Build and Manage Simulation Engineer Competency
Nawal Prinja, Technology Director (Nuclear), WOOD Plc
This lecture will focus on “maintenance and further development of expertise and skills” required by many industry
regulators. Methodology to build and manage this competency in an organisation will be introduced along with the new
Professional Simulation Engineer (PSE) qualification. PSE certification covers 26 technical areas and has more than 1400
competency statements for simulation engineers at every stage of their career. It is specific to analysis & simulation using
FEA and CFD but is not specific to any particular software package.
The talk will present a sample of competency statements from selected technical areas covering:
• Core FEA
• Fundamentals Of Computational Fluid Dynamics
• Flaw Assessment And Fracture Mechanics
• Fatigue And Simulation Management

5D - WORKSHOP SESSION
From Materials Testing through Stress Simulation and Experimental Validation
Andrew Halfpenny, Director of Technology , HBMPrenscia
A small spring clip has been designed as part of a kitchen draw closing mechanism. The clip was found to fail prematurely
during qualification test and this has lead to a long delay in production. The manufacturer is keen to avoid similar problems in
the future and wants to model this type of component using FE.
In this workshop we consider the entire design process for the spring clip. We start by testing the base material in a fatigue
tes trig and derive an SN fatigue curve. The physics of fatigue is introduced and particular attention is paid to the likely
statistical spread of life in real components.
An FE model of the component has been produced and a fatigue analysis is run to determine where and when the failure will
occur.Practical guidance on FE modelling techniques are given to ensure the best possible fatigue results.
Finally a physical qualification test is run using a working scaled model of a real fatigue test rig. This rig was developed in-
house by nCode’s laboratory technicians. It is used to test very small components and to train our apprentices. The correlation
between the test life and predicted life is discussed.

6D - WORKSHOP SESSION
How to Demonstrate Design Code Compliance using FEA
Nawal Prinja, Technology Director (Nuclear), WOOD Plc.
This lecture is aimed at practising engineers who are keen to utilise Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in the design process.
There are two basic approaches to the design of engineering components and structures: design by rule and design by
analysis. In the design by rule approach, rules and limitations set by a design standard are adhered to. The design by analysis
approach requires either analytical or computational effort to predict stress levels and this is where the FEA is often used. The
workshop will highlight the main issues in using FEA in conjunction with design codes and covers various aspects of FEA
practice and assessment of a design. Since most of the design codes were written before the advent of FEA, it is important to
appreciate the importance of various classes and categories of stresses used in the design codes.
The talk will highlight the biggest change in history of structural design codes and explain how uncertainty is being accounted
for through the use of probabilistically calibrated partial safety factors instead of the traditional ‘factor of safety’. This change
has been introduced through the new Eurocodes which have replaced the old BS codes. The basic principles used in the two
types of design codes (allowable stress codes and limit state codes) along with code treatments for design against failure will
be discussed.