Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Session 1, 2018
Faculty of Business, Justice and Behavioural Sciences
Australian Graduate Management Consortium
Subject Overview
Welcome to a new session of study at Charles Sturt University. This subject outline is
accessible through mobile devices from http://m.csu.edu.au.
Learning outcomes
On successful completion of this subject, you should:
- Be able to provide realistic, theoretically-sound and well-informed technical HR
solutions to meet the business requirements of organisations;
- Be able to propose and critically evaluate plausible alternative HR solutions to
business problems;
- Be able to engage with contemporary digital platforms to develop, communicate and
review HR solutions;
- Be able to work effectively with peers to develop, synthesise and negotiate group
responses to HR problems through role play and other group processes;
- Be able to access, appraise and critically apply academic and professional literature
in the formulation of business-relevant HR recommendations and solutions; and
- Be able to reflect on learning processes that involve individual, group and
technology-mediated environments.
-
Attendance
Students are strongly encouraged to attend all scheduled face-to-face or online workshops /
classes. Learning is seen to be a continuous process of –
It is the teacher's aim to enhance the learning potential of your personal experience by using
a range of teaching methods. In conjunction with learning the principles, concepts and
theoretical frameworks of business management, students are required to apply this
knowledge to solving managerial problems in a real-world context. In addition to traditional
lecture formats, students are engaged in learning through case studies, simulations,
experiential exercises, group projects, discussions, learning logs, peer feedback and self-
assessment.
Contact Procedures
Academic enquiries
Any questions concerning the teaching of this subject can be made by contacting your
Administrative enquiries
Any questions concerning administrative matters should be directed to your Site Coordinator.
Contact details for your Site Coordinator are available on your Delivery Site’s Interact2
Group Site.
Subject Delivery
Class/tutorial times and location
The timetable provided in this Subject Outline is a guide to your study schedule. Please
contact your Site Coordinator about your class/workshop times and locations.
The study guide and/or study material for this subject will be available through the subject’s
Interact Site.
You should check the Interact Site at least weekly for postings, announcements, lecture
information and other resources that will assist you with your studies, or for additional
information and resources vital to your success in the subject.
Use the subject schedule provided to plan your studies over the session. Information on
effective time management is available on the CSU Learning Skills website via the
following link: http://student.csu.edu.au/study
This subject is taught using a continuous case centring on an authentic, but fictional,
organisation, Civil Engineering & Research Associates (CERA). A website for the case
study company is linked to the Interact2 site. Please get to know the material on this site
as it will be used throughout the subject. The topics in the subject are integrated with HR
scenarios arising in the company. You will be asked to prepare advice and
recommendations to address these scenarios as part of the assessments.
Studying HRM515 is fairly straightforward. Use the Schedule in this Subject Outline to
guide your weekly study. There are six topics in the subject, which are completed
As you study the topics, you will also be undertaking assessment tasks. One of these is a
slice of role play, where you will be able to immerse yourself in the CERA story, by taking
on the role of the characters as you work on role plays in class. This is a fun and engaging
way to learn.
To summarise, the best way to study this subject is to follow the Schedule in this Subject
Outline and work through each topic in order, following the instructions provided. You
should also refer to the CERA website on the Interact2 site for the subject. The online
topics can be found in the link ‘Topics’ in your Interact2 site for this subject.
Queries regarding the content of this subject should be directed to your Subject Facilitator.
Schedule
Session week Week Topics (Additional materials are provided in
commencing the online topics.)
1 26 February 2018 Topic 1 – HRM, making a difference.
Textbook reading, Chapters 1 & 2.
Assessment Information
Introduction to assessment
To protect the academic integrity of the subject, you may be asked to complete an
additional test (which may be verbal) if I or another member of the teaching staff have
doubts that the work that you have submitted for an assessment item is your own. This test
would be held within four weeks of the submission of the assessment.
Please note that submission requirements for assessment items are as set out in this
document only. Ignore references to other submission methods that are contained in the
online topics. If in doubt, ask your Subject Facilitator.
Assessment Items
Item number Title Type Value Due Date* Return Date**
1 Critical evaluation of Assignment 30% 18 March 11 April 2018
HR information 2018
2 Business Report Assignment 40% 7 May 2018 29 May 2018
3 A slice of role play Assignment 30% 1 June 2018 25 June 2018
* due date is the last date for assessment items to be received at the University
** applies only to assessment items submitted by the due date.
Task
This assessment task consists has four parts.
A. Evidence-based HRM, a specific application of the broader term, evidence-based
management, is a cornerstone in this subject. Using at least two information sources
from academic journal articles, explain what is meant by this term. Why is this
important in HR practice? (200 words)
B. Find any two written internet sources that you believe would be useful to Israel Tobin
in persuading Mark French of the strategic value of the HR function in CERA. (The
sources do not need to be used by Israel in full – they are to inform his presentation.)
Briefly, explain how each source might be used to support Israel’s pitch to Mark
French and the CERA executive team. (300 words)
C. Using the CRAP test, evaluate the two sources that you used above. (500 words)
D. Draw conclusions regarding the nature of information that should be used to inform
practice. (200 words)
Rationale
This assessment task will enable you to demonstrate your achievement of the following
learning outcome in the subject:
• be able to critically evaluate the role of human resource management in effective
organisational management.
Presentation
To present your answer, simply list each part using a short heading, and write your answer
in sentences and paragraphs. Use 12 point font, 1.5 line spacing.
Do not number the sections or use dot points in the body of the paper.
Include a cover page showing the total word count. The word count includes everything
other than the cover page and the reference list. It includes in-text citations and text included
in images.
Do not use footnotes or appendices.
Reference all sources used with in-text citations and a reference list. Please get across the
APA6 referencing system. A guide to this system is available from your Student homepage.
Marks will be reduced for failure to follow presentation requirements.
Mark
Requirements
As per the CSU Referencing Policy, proper referencing is required for each task. Please
use the APA6 referencing format, which can be found at
http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu.
Task
Assessment 2 requires you to prepare a business report that addresses one (1) of the
following three options. These questions relate to Topics 2, 3 and 4.
Option 1- Work design pilot at CERA (Topic 2)
Refer to the story of CERA relating to work design in Topic 2. Using the information in the
topic and at least 10 additional sources, provide advice to Rachel Amaro on how to design
jobs in her area to support innovative behaviour. At least five of the additional sources must
be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last ten years.
Option 2 - The business rationale for diversity management (Topic 3)
Study the business rationale for diversity management and the debates surrounding this
using the information in Topic 3, and at least 10 additional sources. At least five of the
additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last
ten years.
Then, answer this question.
Are you convinced by the business rationale argument for diversity management? What
argument would you make to Mark French regarding the business case for focusing on
diversity management in CERA?
Option 3 - Options for performance measurement in CERA (Topic 4)
Consider the story of CERA as it relates to individual performance measurement in Topic 4
(note that this does not include the operation of the bonus scheme). Then, answer these two
questions, using the information in Topic 4 and at least 10 additional sources. At least five of
the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the
last ten years.
1. What limitations are evident in CERA’s individual performance measurement,
taking into account its organisational strategy and recent developments in this HRM
practice as reported in professional literature provided in Topic 4?
Rationale
This assessment task will enable you to demonstrate your achievement of the following
learning outcomes in the subject:
• be able to critically analyse and assess recent literature on human resource
management, and debate the issues raised;
• be able to explain how human resource management initiatives assist stakeholders
within organisations to respond to changing workplace environments; and
Marking criteria
Presentation
• Use the business report format that is provided in the Resources link on the Interact
2 site.
• Use 12 point font size and 1.5 line spacing
Marking Rubric
Report The report is Minor errors in The report is The report is on Poor
writing formatted report format. formatted the right track, formatting,
technique correctly. It is The writing according to but needs written
written using style and business report significant expression
(5 marks) appropriate language are conventions, improvement in and/or
language and appropriate for but with some format and/or coherence.
style. A a report. errors in writing style
coherent format. The and/or
argument is There are minor language and coherence.
built, with each errors in writing style
point building coherence of are not always
on the previous the argument appropriate to
one. Each part and in a report genre.
of argument is connections There may be
connected to made to the gaps in
the question. question. It is coherence of
thus unclear at the argument,
times why making it
some parts of difficult to
the argument follow.
have been
provided.
Mark
Requirements
The word count excludes the title page and the reference list. All other content is included
in the word count. Upload a Word document only. Do not upload rtf or pdf or Pages
documents. Do not use appendices, footnotes and endnotes. Use the APA6 referencing
system for citations and references to sources. Keep to the word count. Papers that
exceed the word count may not be marked.
Value: 30%
Due date: 1 June 2018
Return date: 25 June 2018
Length: 1000 words maximum, +/- 10%, using template provided
Submission method options: Alternative submission method
Task
You will be doing two role play tasks, using the problems that are given below. Each role
play is worth 15 marks. The role plays in the first two topics are for practice only. Your
facilitator will form teams of up to five people each, and then facilitate these role plays so
that you get a feel for how they need to work. It is important to attend classes, so you don’t
miss out on these opportunities to practice.
In topics 3 to 6, you will be doing the role plays live as assessment tasks. Each role play will
be marked and the best two scores will be used for grading this assessment task. Therefore,
it is important that you attend these classes, so that you don’t miss out. Non-attendance
equals a zero mark for you, as well as putting additional, unwanted pressure on your team.
Late arrival will attract a reduced mark.
In addition to the live role play, each team must hand in a copy of the role play workings
using a template that your facilitator will provide. This must be done at the start of the
following class.
Topic 3
Should we follow our competitors or do something quite different in recruitment? (Why or
why not?)
Topic 4
What should we be trying to achieve in our individual performance measurement system?
Topic 5
What principles should we apply in deciding what employee development is funded by
CERA?
Topic 6
Should we do away with workplace celebrations because of the risks that CERA is carrying?
(Why or why not?)
Rationale
This assessment task will enable you to demonstrate your achievement of the following
learning outcomes in the subject:
• be able to evaluate current human resource management practices and draw up well
supported recommendations for improvement where necessary.
Marking Rubric
Group Group solution Group solution Group solution Minimum Fails to meet
solution/process and process and process and process requirements the minimum
(5, for each role demonstrates demonstrates demonstrates are requirements
play) ability to ability to ability to addressed, of the task.
negotiate negotiate negotiate but may be
different different different too willing to
Mark
Requirements
In addition to the live role play, each team must hand in a copy of the role play workings
using a template that your facilitator will provide.
This must be done at the start of the following class.
Grades
Final grades for this subject are awarded by the Business Faculty Assessment
Committee in accordance with the University's Assessment Regulations. (See current
Academic Regulations at https://policy.csu.edu.au/search.php)
Grading Scale
HD High Distinction 85% - 100%
An outstanding level of achievement in relation to the assessment process.
FL Fail 0 - 49%
An unsatisfactory level of achievement.
The percentages specified above should be viewed only as guidelines for the award of
final grades. The Faculty has an obligation to ensure that grades are equitable across
different cohorts of the same subject offering and will undertake appropriate moderation
processes to ensure that grades are awarded consistently in accordance with the
University’s Moderation Policy.
Presentation
1. Introduction
• Make sure you proof read your work before you submit it - poor grammar and
typographical errors detract from the quality of your writing and will affect your grade
• You must acknowledge the published sources that you draw your facts and ideas from by
citing them within your work and including them in a reference list at the end. Citing
references lends strength to your arguments and is also important to avoid accusations
of plagiarism (see the section on Plagiarism in this outline). You should follow the
referencing guidelines provided on the subject Interact site
• Keep a copy of your submission in case the original is lost
2. Research
As a postgraduate student you are expected to draw on the key literature of the discipline to
support your writing. You are also expected to discuss the literature critically. This means
you need several different skills.
• Information search skills – you need to be able to locate potential sources relevant to
your topic. This usually involves using a library catalogue to identify books and journals;
searching online article databases subscribed to by CSU Library; and/or accessing
publicly available websites. The CSU library provides many online tutorials as well as
personal assistance
• Evaluation skills – you need to be able to assess the sources you find and determine
which are most authoritative. This often involves considering the credentials of the
author, publisher, and organisation associated with the source
• Synthesis/Analysis skills – you need to be able to think critically about what you are
reading. This can involve comparing and contrasting sources to draw out key points of
agreement or conflict, identifying strengths and weaknesses in the arguments of the
sources, and developing your own arguments that are more than simply a summary of
the sources you have read.
3. Preparation
Problems with assessments are often due to inadequate planning and preparation. Rather
than diving straight into writing, stop and think about where you are going with the task. Time
spent thinking about your topic before you begin will save you time and you will produce
better work. The following steps are a guide:
• Make a simple outline of your proposed content to guide your research - list what topic
areas will need to be covered to answer the question
• After you have done some reading in each topic area, refine your outline so that it states
what arguments or key points you'll be making on each topic
• Check that the key points are in a logical order
• Plan opening and closing paragraphs carefully - they are very important signposts for
your reader
• Write a rough draft, without worrying about grammar, etc at this stage
• Read over your draft and check whether:
- all the important ideas are there;
- arguments are supported with evidence/theory/examples;
- ideas flow smoothly in a sensible order;
- your sources have been acknowledged through correct referencing;
- you have used the format required;
- it is close to the word limit; and
- you have answered the question. (This is very important!)
Write the final version. Take the time to proofread thoroughly - you will be marked down for
poor grammar and spelling.
4. Layout
Paper: A4 size blank white paper should be used. Assessments should be word-processed,
in portrait not landscape format.
5. Style
‘I’, ‘we’, ‘you’ or ‘the Writer’: Both the use of personal pronouns ('I', we', 'you') and 'the
writer' are not recommended. The former are too informal and the latter too pompous. It is
much better to make your writing totally impersonal by avoiding both. This means that
careful thought must be put into some sentences to achieve impersonality and keep
language professional and formal.
Abbreviations, Non-English Phrases and Slang: If you can say it in English, you should do
so. Latin phrases and other non-English colloquialisms should be avoided if possible.
Abbreviations (unless a translation is made with the initial use) and slang, should be
avoided.
Critical writing: At the postgraduate level you must take a critical orientation when writing.
Reports that are purely descriptive are unlikely to be awarded a passing grade. Express
other people's ideas in your own words and go beyond what they have said on a topic by
adding your own ideas, opinions and experiences. To do this analyse and critique
relevant literature and theories and put forward your own reasoned argument. Support
your arguments wherever possible with supporting literature (and citations) and if
appropriate workplace examples.
Quotations: Generally avoid direct quotations except short ones used for a particular
effect. It is better to express the idea in your own words. (Whether you paraphrase or
quote an idea, don't forget to cite the source correctly).
6. Referencing
Referencing is an important component of academic writing. All assessment tasks should be
referenced according to APA referencing.
Facilitators must ensure that their name is recorded on each student’s cover sheet, along
with the date the assessment item was marked.
Extensions
In order to ensure that students who hand their assessments in on time are not
disadvantaged, and to enable the lecturer to comply with the requirement to return
assessments to the class within 15 working days, the following rules about extensions will
be strictly enforced:
1. Extensions cannot be granted for online tests, as these have to be done within a specific
time frame, after which the answers are released to the class automatically
2. Computer problems and normal work-related pressures and family commitments do not
constitute sufficient reasons for the granting of extensions
3. If it becomes obvious that you are not going to be able to submit an assessment on time
because of an unavoidable problem, you must submit your request for an extension to
your Site Coordinator in writing (email) prior to the due date.
Requests for extensions will not be granted on or after the due date so you must make
sure that any extension is requested prior to the day on which the assessment is due.
You are expected to do all you can to meet assessment deadlines. Work and family
related pressures do not normally constitute sufficient reasons for the granting of
extensions or incomplete grades
4. If you apply for an extension, you may be asked to email your facilitator on what you
have done so far on the assessment
5. You must be able to provide documentary evidence (such as a certificate from a doctor
or counsellor) justifying the need for an extension as soon as practicable - but please
note that if the circumstances giving rise to the request for an extension arise on a day
when you cannot get documentary evidence, you must still apply for the extension before
the due date and submit the documentary evidence afterwards
6. Given the tight deadlines involved in returning assessments and feedback to, the
maximum extension granted generally will be seven days from the due date
7. Assessments received more than 10 days after the due date or extension date will not be
marked unless the staff member decides otherwise. Items received late will be penalised
at 10% of the mark available for the assessment item per day it is late (see below)
8. Note that for purposes of measuring lateness, the 'day' begins just after 00.00 hrs AEST
- so an assessment received after midnight of the due date will be penalised 10% for
lateness. This rule will be applied to all students uniformly.
Re-submission
The first assessment item of each subject can be re-submitted once only, if it appears a pass
will not be achieved on the first attempt.
10% deduction per day, including weekends, of the maximum marks allocated for the
assessment task, i.e. one day late 10% deduction, or two days late 20% deduction.
If an assessment is due on a Friday but is not submitted until the following Tuesday, then the
penalty will be four days (40% deduction or 8 marks in the example above).
Submission more than 10 days late will be acknowledged as received but will not be marked.
Assessment Return
You should normally expect your marked assessment item to be dispatched/returned to you
within 15 working days of the due date, if your assessment item was submitted on time. If an
assessment item is submitted on time but not returned by the return date, you should make
enquiries in the first instance to your Subject Facilitator. If the Subject Facilitator is not
available, contact your Site Coordinator.
Plagiarism
Charles Sturt University expects that the work of its students and staff will uphold the values
of academic honesty and integrity. The Guide to Avoiding Plagiarism is located at: Avoiding
Plagiarism (http://student.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/832578/Avoiding-
plagiarism.pdf). This is an important resource that will help you understand these values and
apply them in practice. You should familiarise yourself with these requirements and ensure
that all assessments submitted by you are your own work, have not been submitted
elsewhere and comply with the University's requirements for academic integrity.
The University has purchased Turnitin software. This software has two functions, a pre-
emptive education function which students may use to check their own work prior to
submission, and a plagiarism detection function which academics may use to check the
student’s work for improper citation or potential plagiarism. Use by students is optional and is
not a prerequisite for submission.
You are encouraged to check your work for originality prior to submission. You can register
with Turnitin to create a Student Account under the CSU Turnitin Licence at
http://www.turnitin.com/login_page.asp. Further information on how to use Turnitin is
provided within the Guide to Avoiding Plagiarism:
http://student.csu.edu.au/library/integrity/referencing-at-csu/checking.
The Academic Progress Policy sets out the requirements and procedures for satisfactory
academic progress, for the exclusion of students who fail to progress satisfactorily and for
the termination of enrolment for students who fail to complete in the maximum allowed time.
Variations to Assessment
Should it be necessary to vary the assessment in this subject, you will be notified in writing
by the Site Coordinator. The variations to assessment include variations to the assessment
tasks and/or assessment procedures for assessments, examinations and any other
assessment task published in the Subject Outline. The variations will be communicated only
after the Subject Coordinator or Subject Convenor has obtained approval from their Head of
School. The overriding principle is that such changes will not disadvantage students and is
made in accordance with the Subject Outlines Policy.
Evaluation of Subjects
It is University policy that all subjects are evaluated every time that they are offered. The
University's Division of Student Learning administers the Subject Experience Survey through
CSU's online evaluation system. Staff in the faculties and schools value your feedback very
highly and take account of your comments when reviewing learning and teaching in each
subject. If you are interested in the details of any enhancements to this subject as a result of
the latest survey, please contact the Site Coordinator.
Individual subject results are reported to the Subject Coordinator and Heads of Schools after
grades have been submitted for each teaching session (except where subjects have one
student the results are not reported to staff).
Special Consideration
https://policy.csu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00298
Academic Regulations provide for special consideration to be given where a student suffers
misadventure or extenuating circumstances during the session which prevent them from
meeting acceptable standards or deadlines. If a student cannot submit all their assessment
items before the end of teaching session deadline, they are required to submit a Request for
Special Consideration.
Assessment Regulations
The assessment practices of all University subjects are conducted in accordance with the
University’s Assessment Policy: Coursework Subjects.
Academic Conduct
The University expects that you, as a student, will be honest in your studies and research
and that you will not do anything that will interfere with or frustrate the studies and research
of other students. In particular, you are expected to:
- acknowledge the work of others in your assessments and other assessable work;
- not knowingly allow others to use your work without acknowledgment;
- report honestly the findings of your study and research; and
- use only permitted materials in examinations.
Students are also expected to be responsible in the use of University facilities and resources
and to abide by University rules concerning the Library and electronic resources, including:
- the Library Rule; and the
- Computing and Communications Facilities Use Policy
Copies of the Rules of the Library and Code of Conduct for Users of Electronic Facilities can
also be obtained from the Library or the Division of Information Technology (DIT) Service
Desk.
Students also have expectations of the University and of other students in the cooperative
endeavour of studying. Details of these expectations are provided in the Student Charter
(http://student.csu.edu.au/study/student-charter).
Student Inquiries
Please refer to your Participant’s Guide for details about inquiry and information services.
Primo Search
Finding the resources you need is easy with Primo Search. Search most of the Library’s
collections, including online resources, print publications and CSU research. Plus, you can
easily place loan requests, view your current loans, and renew items online.
Online Resources
You’ll find journal databases, eBook collections, and other useful online information sources
listed under Key Resources (http://student.csu.edu.au/library/find-information).
eReserve
Some subject readings may be held in eReserve. Online access is encouraged to help
reduce CSU’s carbon footprint, however a printed copy of eReserve subject readings can be
purchased through CSU Print.
Borrowing
Your borrowing privileges depend on your enrolment. Visit Information for Students to find
out what you are eligible for. Visit Library Help for more information on borrowing and access
to resources.
Need help?
CSU Library staff are available to answer your questions by phone, Live Chat, email, forum,
or in person. See Ask a Librarian for more information.
Keep up to date with what is happening in your Library through Facebook, Twitter and our
blog. CSU Library Facebook (https://twitter.com/CSU_Library) CSU Library Blogs.
Students who haven't studied for a while, or who want to brush up on their skills in a few
areas before commencing their studies, may wish to enrol in a STUDY LINK subject. STUDY
LINK subjects provide participants with an opportunity to increase their skills and help them
develop a clear understanding of the expectations of studying at University. Further
information about CSU’s STUDY LINK program is available at:
http://www.csu.edu.au/division/studylink.