Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
integration in
changing food
markets
Smallholder integration in changing
food markets
By
Pedro Arias
David Hallam
Ekaterina Krivonos
Jamie Morrison
The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and
do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
© FAO 2013
All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other
commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-
request or addressed to copyright@fao.org.
5 Acknowledgements
6 Foreword
44 References
R
ecent increases in the levels and Part 1 examines the characteristics of
volatility of food prices have created smallholder farming from a market
significant challenges to efforts to perspective, explaining that different
reduce levels of food insecurity both at categories of smallholder producer face
national and household levels. As a result, widely different sets of issues and
significant political attention has been given constraints to market participation, stressing
to the promotion of improvements in food the mutual reinforcement of productivity
staples productivity in developing countries, growth and market integration, and setting
both to offset the rapidly increasing costs of this in a dynamic context of the constrained
food imports, and to stimulate increased choices facing different producers. It then
incomes and hence food security status at sets up the policy challenges facing
the household level. governments in attempting to alleviate the
This attention has been manifested both constraints facing these producers.
at country level, with many developing Part 2 considers the determinants of
countries placing food staples at the centre smallholder participation in rapidly evolving
of their agriculture development agricultural markets, considering the
programmes, and at the global level, for categories of constraints and risks faced in
example in the context of the recent G20 increasing levels of production for sale in
initiatives. different market outlets and the
A central focus of these initiatives has mechanisms through which the choices
been to develop and advocate mechanisms made by different market participants shape
that will result in increased levels of smallholders’ integration into markets.
production by smallholder producers Part 3 introduces examples of the types
through the adoption of productivity — of solutions that may be required to facilitate
enhancing technology underpinned by the participation of smallholders in markets
improved research and development, at different levels of formalization,
facilitated access to critical inputs and considering arrangements such as producer
production — related risk reduction organizations in aggregating smallholder
measures. production to market, and then the
Less attention has been given to the potential of mechanisms, or support
significant heterogeneity of smallholder services, such as market-based risk
producers, both in terms of their access to management instruments, market
the productive assets required to be able to information systems and extension.
increase production and, perhaps more Part 4 then turns to examine how such
importantly, in terms of their willingness to arrangements and mechanisms might best
increase production for sale. be delivered to the smallholder sector, with
A key message of this report is that prominence given to the role of the public
without better understanding the sector, broadly defined to include
determinants of smallholders’ participation government, donors and civil society.
in agricultural markets, and formulating
appropriate measures to facilitate improved
participation, initiatives seeking to promote
the adoption of productivity enhancing
technology by smallholder producers are
likely to have limited success.
Acknowledgements
T
his report was written by Pedro Arias, as well as to Boubaker Ben-Belhassen for
David Hallam, Ekaterina Krivonos reviewing earlier drafts.
and Jamie Morrison of the Trade The reference list was compiled by
and Markets Division. Acknowledgement Francisco Infante, and the report was
is given to the specific contribution of formatted by Rita Ashton.
Nora Ourabah Haddad on cooperative Special mention should be made of the
action, Siobhan Kelly on the formalization contribution of Marianna Paschali, who sadly
of markets, David Hallam on investment, passed away during the final preparation of
and Shukri Ahmed on risk management this report.
S
mall-scale agriculture is the main source Raising agricultural productivity and
of food in the developing world, strengthening resilience are also seen as key
producing up to 80 percent of the food to responding to the challenges of food price
consumed in many developing countries, volatility. Smallholder producers need to cope
notably in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. With with price volatility and reduce their own
poor rural households making up two-thirds vulnerability, but they also need to contribute
of the global population earning less than to mitigating the impacts of price volatility for
$1.25 per day, smallholder agriculture is also the benefit of all. This implies a need for a
an important source of income underpinning significant supply response and enhanced
the livelihoods of vast numbers of poor integration into markets.
people. Smallholders and small family farms Raising smallholder productivity is
are therefore central to an inclusive obviously a strategic necessity, but attempts
development process and their contribution is to raise productivity will have limited success if
crucial to food security. However, that smallholder linkages to markets are not
contribution is limited by low levels of strengthened simultaneously. Similarly,
productivity that constrain smallholders’ strengthening market linkages will have little
ability to ensure their own livelihoods and benefit with existing low levels of productivity.
food security and to support the food security Even in the case of productivity improvement,
of the rest of the population. the common emphasis on increasing research
Smallholder agriculture is characterized by and development is too simplistic. Improving
small production volumes of variable quality smallholder productivity is not only about
that reflect limited access to inputs and moving the technology frontier outward. It is
finance, low levels of investment and limited also about closing the gap between the
access to, and knowledge of, improved frontier and what smallholder producers
agricultural technologies and practices. High actually achieve in practice. In some cases,
levels of price and production risk and especially in sub-Saharan Africa, smallholder
uncertainty and limited access to tools to producers can be achieving as little as thirty
manage them deter investment in more percent of the yields that could be achieved
productive new technologies that would under field conditions. Inadequate linkages to
enable smallholders to produce surpluses for efficient and inclusive markets is often a key
sale in markets. Inadequate infrastructure, reason for low levels of adoption of available
high costs of storage and transportation and productivity-increasing technologies.
non-competitive markets also militate against Reducing poverty and enhancing food
production of a marketable surplus. Given security therefore require greater smallholder
these constraints, it is not surprising that the integration into markets and more inclusive
supply response of many small producers to value chains since, without these, adoption of
recent high food prices has been muted. new technologies and productivity growth
Production, consumption and marketing will be limited. However, markets and value
decisions by smallholders are the outcome of chains are not static. They are also changing
constrained choices, made with imperfect with the growing importance of the more
information in a highly risky environment. formal sector, partly but not only as a result of
The importance of smallholder agriculture the spread of supermarkets. Higher quality
and the constraints which limit its productivity standards, higher value products, traceability
are widely acknowledged. G20 governments and contracts are all becoming part of the
have recently called for strengthening ever more demanding environment that
agricultural research and innovation, paying smallholders need to adapt to, even in their
special attention to the needs of smallholders local markets.
and small family farms and creating the Smallholders and small family farms are
enabling environment to encourage public not homogeneous and face different sets of
and private investment to support them. constraints to participation in markets. Since
S
mallholder agriculture is key to food (i) the smallholder household’s access to,
security for two pivotal reasons: as a and the productivity of, assets, including
source of food and as a source of natural resources, labour, and capital,
income for large numbers of people living in vis-à-vis their subsistence needs will
poverty. Smallholder agriculture – including determine both their ability and their
crop farming, livestock, husbandry, forestry willingness to increase production for
and fisheries – provides the bulk of the food sale in markets;
consumed in vast regions of the developing (ii) the connectivity of smallholders to
world. Smallholder agriculture is also the basis different markets, which can be
for the livelihoods of two-thirds of the global considered in terms of remoteness
population currently living in poverty. (defined broadly to include geographical
Smallholder agriculture is practised by a proximity knowledge asymmetries and
highly heterogeneous group of producers. power relationships, and the costs of
The diversity of smallholders within and across commerce, or “transaction costs”) will
locations is such that the term “smallholder” modify the incentives that they face;
resists a universal definition. A review of the (iii) the functionality of these markets: many
literature reveals that smallholders are often local food markets are volatile due to the
defined in relation to the sector in which they low volumes transacted, and their limited
operate, that smallholders share some or all of integration with regional or international
the characteristics compiled in the figure markets, which limits the market’s ability
opposite, and that clustered across various to modify demand and/or supply side
characteristics, smallholders tend to be shocks. Volatility can affect the level and
classified in different categories depending on riskiness of returns to the producer.
the kind of questions to which answers are Where markets are not well integrated,
sought by analysts and policy makers. returns to increased output can diminish
Just as smallholders are a heterogeneous quickly as prices plummet, significantly
group, the markets in which they participate affecting incentives for market
are also diverse in terms of their size, participation and, consequently, for
geographic location, connectivity to other productivity-enhancing technology
markets, power relations between market adoption.
players, and institutional setting. Smallholder households therefore differ
The figure lists different sets of significantly in the way in which they
characteristics of smallholder agriculture and participate in markets and in the extent to
of the markets that they have access to that which these markets offer attractive
can act as determinants of the extent to which opportunites. The design of policy
smallholders participate as sellers and/or interventions aimed at encouraging increased
buyers. smallholder participation needs to take better
This report focuses on the implications of account of these differences.
smallholder heterogeneity with respect to
their participation in markets. With this focus
in mind, and drawing on Barrett (2010),
smallholder heterogeneity can be considered
along three dimensions:
CHARACTERISTICS
DECISION MAKING ■ Low labour productivity
■ Constrained choice
■ High land productivity
■ Risk averse
■ High productivity of capital
■ Consumption and production decisions not easily separable
■ Technically efficient
■ Subsistence agriculture TECHNOLOGY ■ Resilient agriculture
■ Farming as a livelihood
■ Tacit knowledge prevails
■ Little use of purchased inputs
MARKET ■ Volume
■ Isolated
■ Regional INTEGRATION
■ Global
■ Infrastructure
■ Legal framework INSTITUTIONAL SETTING
S
mallholder productivity improvements1 Eastern and Southern Africa, including the
are key in ensuring the sustainability of harmonization of standards and the potential
inclusive and broad-based agricultural use of commodity exchanges and warehouse
transformation processes. Increased marketed receipt systems.
production can help not only in stabilizing Case study examples of success in the
local market prices, providing improved development of product-specific value chains,
incentives for investment, but also in the inclusive of smallholders, reveal that this
creation of opportunities for households to process has often been slow, and made
generate cash surpluses, which when spent or possible only following the sequential
reinvested within the rural economy can alleviation of key constraints, generally
generate significant multiplier effects. underpinned by appropriate public sector
This process evolves in the market place: support. Developing an inclusive chain can be
productivity growth and smallholder market a painfully slow process, requiring patience
integration not only go together, but are also and trust from both buyer and producer,
mutually reinforcing. sometimes requiring the presence of an
Different smallholders face different honest broker of the relationships and
incentives and constraints to productivity guardian of business confidentiality, for
growth and market integration. Some example an NGO. In many cases where
smallholders have the capability and the development has been short lived, or
willingness to participate in markets; others confined to a subset of stakeholders,
do not. Processes of smallholder integration appropriate support from the public sector
to food markets and of technical change are was absent.
well documented, but the determinants of
their patterns of market participation are yet A dynamic perspective: pathways
to be adequately understood. This disconnect available to smallholders
has compromised the formulation of
successful policies aimed at facilitating greater Any policy set aligned with a longer-term
smallholder market participation. strategy supportive of agricultural sector
The constraints to participation of different development needs to take a dynamic
types of smallholder are not only multi- perspective which recognises that different
faceted, but change as a result of market categories of smallholder producer will follow,
developments . While, traditionally, domestic either by choice or by compulsion, different
food markets have been conceptualised and pathways during agricultural sector
analysed as spot market transactions, an transformation.
increasing number of opportunities are Faced with the same set of policy induced
becoming available to smallholders for market incentives, such as encouraging
participating in, and benefiting from, increased production of staple foods, some
processes of value chain development. smallholders will intensify production on
Although the focus of value chain existing plots through the adoption of new
development has often been on higher value technologies or practices; others will increase
products for trade in more lucrative markets, the amount of land under the production of
whether export or higher income segments of the crop in question. Some smallholders will
domestic markets, processes of value chain be constrained from benefiting from
development are also significant in basic food improved opportunities due to their
product chains. An example is the remoteness from these markets, their access
formalization of staple grain value chains in to productive assets, and specific household-
level constraints such as dependency
structures and educational levels.
1 Including through efficiency gains, technological Not all producers will therefore seek to
change and economies of scale . increase production for sale in markets.
Ensuring broad based smallholder commercially oriented production (Poole et market for the product that will assure
participation in markets may necessitate al., 2010). farmers consistent and attractive financial
giving emphasis to the development of Market pull is therefore critical and benefits, and give farmers the confidence to
basic staple food chains, where small evidence suggests that smallholders do make the necessary investments and
farmers are likely to be more heavily respond to market demand. For example, a changes in practice to supply these markets
involved. However, strategies aimed at large number of episodes of growth have (FAO, 2010).
developing food staples value chains need occurred in various agricultural products in In the past, much focus on agriculture
to consider the propensity of smallholder the exports across the Pacific region (squash development has been on supply side issues
producers to generate marketable in Tonga, passion fruit in Samoa, vanilla in without sufficient attention paid to how
surpluses of those that are essentially food Papua New Guinea, kava in Tonga, Fiji and the farmer is going to market the new
security crops. Samoa). Often, however, these episodes surplus. Basically, if a farmer cannot sell a
In Zambia, while cassava is extensively have not been sustained, and smallholders product that is surplus to subsistence
grown in some regions of the country, have been quick to pull back, suggesting requirements, why grow it? In times of a
almost 90 percent of total production is for that the market must also have the capacity strong and sustained market demand
subsistence (non-marketed). This factor has to remain profitable and accessible in the farmers will also more actively seek and
constrained the adoption of improved longer term. Therefore an essential adopt productivity-enhancing technology
varieties deemed necessary to achieve precondition for any successful agricultural and management methods.
levels and consistency required for more enterprise is that there must be a sustained
G
overnments have a key role to play in employment growth) and non efficiency (i.e.
alleviating market failures that reducing levels of poverty and food insecurity
prevent smallholders from rates) objectives. Policies can be in support of
participating in markets, but they must do so either objective depending on the context,
in a way that allows producers to make but generally, the number of sub-sectors,
choices consistent with broader social, chains or chain components in which greater
economic and environmental objectives. levels of smallholder participation could be
Policy should therefore be formulated in a beneficial will outweigh the resources
way that ensures that external costs to the available to the public sector. Governments
society do not accrue from poor, and need to make decisions as to whether to
potentially damaging, private sector “pick winners”, or to develop a conducive
investment choices in the agriculture sector. environment that benefits most. Decisions
This is particularly so where agriculture plays a will also be required as to the level at which
primary role in food security, the provision of interventions are made (see next page).
social safety nets, and social cohesion.
Faced with an array of demands on scarce What type of support?
budgetary and human resources, the public Often stakeholders complain that there is “no
sector must address a number of questions. government policy support towards their
sector”. Perceptions related to government
Where to focus support? support are always important, but not all
Policy objectives are multiple and cover both support will, or should be, in the form of
efficiency (i.e. income generation, direct subsidy to the product, the producer or
Government strategies aimed at driving • the rapid recovery of the Samoan economy
greater commercialization should not following successive natural (cyclones) and
result in significant shifts in production biological (taro leaf blight) disasters with
technology or farming practices away from other traditional crops filling the void;
traditional systems, and the benefits that • the remarkable turnaround of the Fijian
these systems bring in terms of resilience, economy following the devastating
and the provision of environmental and ‘100 year’ drought of 1997/98;
cultural services. • the tempering of the humanitarian
The first responsibility of the small disaster associated with the ethnic
farmer in the Pacific Island countries is to conflict in Solomon Islands and the civil
secure food for the family. Subsistence war in Bougainville; and
food production in traditional farming • the production response of Papua New
systems together with subsistence and Guinea root crop growers to the sharp
artisanal fishing continues to be the basis increase in imported grain prices
of food security in the region and provides following the depreciation of the
resilience against external shocks, either national currency.
economic (price spikes, global recession) or A key challenge for the region is
natural (cyclones, floods, droughts, pests developing pathways for commercialization
and diseases, etc.). of traditional farming systems, which allow
McGregor et al., (2009) have highlighted increased cash-generating opportunities for
evidence of the importance of traditional rural households, without sacrificing family
smallholder farming systems in and community cohesion and ultimately
safeguarding food security, which includes: food security.
A
s economies develop, the share of the supermarkets and regional and global value
population engaged in agricultural chains.
production declines and households Though formal markets are becoming
increasingly turn away from self-provisioning more influential, informal markets are still
and informal or small-scale markets towards highly relevant for developing countries.
large-scale commercial supply chains to Efforts to quantify the importance of informal
source the food and other agricultural markets to their economies have been
products that they consume. At the same controversial due to disagreements in the
time, agricultural development necessarily definition of informal economic activities and
entails productivity growth such that farmers’ estimation procedures. Nevertheless, the
harvests increasingly exceed their own consensus amongst analysts is that most food
consumption needs, yielding a marketable consumed in developing countries today is
surplus of growing scale. The combination of still channeled through informal markets.
growing commercial demand and supply
reaches a scale that induces the emergence of
modern marketing channels that employ Boom-bust markets
sophisticated management methods, such as
costly grading and standards requirements or
formal and often interlinked contracts that In Ghana a rapid scaling up of
enable a commercial marketing intermediary participation in the pineapple market
to profitably add value to raw commodities fostered by high profits enjoyed by early
through transport, storage and/or processing. entrants in the 1990s led to a striking
Farmers whose comparative advantage crash. Though some attribution was
permits them to tap the latent demand of given to a shift in European consumer
more distant markets rendered accessible by preferences, favouring a different variety
emergent agricultural value chains typically of pineapple over that supplied by
improve their productivity and profitability, Ghana, consultations with local growers
thereby further accelerating development. suggest the crash was at least as much
The emergence of modern agricultural value caused by market saturation. In either
chains based on contracting and explicit case, smallholder growers had typically
grades and standards, and exhibiting relied on informal, oral contracts that
considerable geographic reach is thus both were readily breached by buyers when
cause and consequence of agricultural and the market collapsed in 2003-4. This
rural development. drove many pineapple growers away
Formal and informal food markets are from the value chain, especially the most
differentiated by the extent to which the recent entrants. It is worth noting,
norms and procedures that govern market moreover, that cooperative formation
transactions are codified (written) or tacit and expansion in Ghana clearly lagged
(oral). In general, formal and informal markets market participation, as government and
coexist in space and time with various degrees NGOs began promoting (and subsidizing)
of incidence. Informal markets may evolve cooperatives in response to the apparent
into formal markets, for example when profitability of smallholder pineapple
sanitary requirements impose restrictions on cultivation. Thus, well-meaning external
the selling of specific food items that do not efforts to help those farmers who had
comply with new legislation, or when new been initially bypassed by agro-exporters
market institutions such as warehouse to “join the party” may have
receipts systems are implemented. Such inadvertently induced catastrophic losses
changes, referred to as market formalization, for those same late entrants to the
are accelerating in developing countries, market.
notably with the increasing penetration of
N
ot all farmers can take advantage of expense only after a minimum volume of
market developments. Smallholder produce is delivered.
farmers’ access to evolving Notwithstanding these constraints,
agricultural markets – especially to value smallholders often take sub-optimal decisions
chains – is commonly constrained. on what and how much to produce because
Geographic barriers such as remoteness, or of their propensity to avoid risk. Farmers are at
biophysical limits to productivity (e.g. due to risk of adverse weather, pests and diseases,
water availability) may make it too costly to volatile prices, volatile policy environments.
participate in modern marketing channels or The incidence of risk varies from one country
may limit the amount of surplus production to another, and the capacity to deal with such
that smallholders can sell. Similarly, limited risks varies across different farmer categories.
productive asset holdings – of land, livestock, The risks facing smallholders associated
labour, critical equipment – may constrain with market integration are often argued to
smallholders’ capacity to generate a sufficient be disproportionately high. This is due to
level and consistency of marketable surplus. difficulties faced in accessing market
The list of constraints is extensive, but an information, credit and other inputs, and
attempt at capturing the most relevant is technical assistance, which together with
detailed in the Figure on the opposite page. inefficient and sometimes conflicting policies,
Existing institutional arrangements under laws and regulations and weak infrastructure,
which farmers can enter into developing can create significant uncertainties in the
marketing channels – related to enforcement returns that smallholders can expect from
of contracts, including product grades and engaging in agricultural markets. However,
standards, access to credit, insurance and the types and levels of risk faced differ
technical information through extension significantly between smallholder producers
services – likewise affect the feasibility and depending on their level and patterns of
attractiveness of entry into modern markets. market participation, and importantly, on the
For example, smallholder growers in markets or value chains in which they seek to
developing countries wanting to participate in participate.
global value chains are required to comply The importance that smallholders attribute
with voluntary standards. Yet compliance is to certain types of risk varies depending on
difficult because it requires considerable whether they participate in formal or informal
informational and organizational resources, markets. Smallholders who sell immediately
which many smallholders may lack. after harvesting their crop to repay.
High recurrent costs associated with consumption loans, face different types of risk
compliance have led to the view that than farmers seeking to meet stringent
certification by smallholders is only possible quantity and quality targets required to sustain
under certain circumstances. Various their participation in more developed markets.
estimations, data, studies and results relating Participation in local markets may be primarily
to the costs of compliance and certification of subject to risks associated with price
small-scale farmers show that a certain uncertainty. Engagement in contractual
minimum production is necessary for a relationships with traders or processers in more
smallholder to be competitive in formal formal or integrated value chains may help to
markets. offset price, related risks, but increase risks
Smallholders often receive little technical associated with production affecting the
support regarding certification, as traders quality or quantity of production and therefore
tend to work with a limited number of larger their ability to meet contractual requirements.
“preferred suppliers” who are able to Participation in higher-value markets can
guarantee a large and continuous supply of also be subject to boom-bust cycles, often
produce. Sunk and running costs of leaving significant numbers of producers
compliance are nontrivial, and are worth the with short-lived or negative returns on the
DECISION-MAKING
■ Price volatility ■ Malfeasance
■ Failure to deliver RISK FACTORS ■ Pests and diseases
■ Severe weather events ■ Inconsistent policies
investments necessary to participate. This is cash flow risks; the adoption of complex Governments have at their disposal a
particularly the case in niche export markets. technology generates risks associated with battery of policy measures that could be
In Tonga, for example, a substantial and high production and therefore delivery; and used either to tackle constraints to market
return market for squash in Japan, together contractual arrangements generate risk of access, or the risk factors that constrain
with technical assistance from the malfeasance, although typically increasing smallholders from participating in markets.
Government, resulted in a substantive supply average incomes and integration into The first challenge for governments is to
response from producers. However, the export-oriented value chains exposes determine which factors to target, namely,
market was not sustained, leaving significant farmers to potentially greater income risks which constraint or risk is holding back
amounts of unsold product and losses to the associated with fluctuations in world market smallholder market participation. The
producers who had made investments in prices. second challenge is the sequencing of
squash production. The above considerations indicate the policy measures during the process of
In a more dynamic context, agricultural importance of recognizing that different types market transformation. Both aspects are
market developments can introduce further of risk are more or less relevant to different described in Part 3.
layers of risk. Credit provision generates categories of producer.
T
he nature of markets changes as they may themselves be late entrants with
become more formal. Policy precarious arrangements with retail clients or
interventions in support of smallholder may struggle to access storage or capacity to
integration need to be sequenced and based transport produce in timely fashion required
on a systematic diagnosis of constraints and to maintain product quality.
risks. Key is to understand how the patterns Agricultural price and yield volatility are key
of market integration observed are affected factors that explain why farmers and firms
by risks and constraints that tend to become each commonly fail to fulfill all the terms of
more prominent as market formalization agreed contracts. Exogenous shocks can
takes place. render one or both parties unable to complete
Interpreting observed contracting patterns the exchange as agreed. The possibility of
and welfare gains associated with shocks means that neither farmers nor firms
participation in different market channels can tell when a contract counterparty simply
requires an analysis at the firm and farm level. reneged on the contract or was rendered
The approach to analysing firm behaviour unable to fulfill the contract due to
that is used in this report draws on a paper by extenuating circumstances. In all countries,
Christopher Barrett, commissioned by FAO farmers claim that they bear the bulk of the
and is particularly useful for underscoring risks, such as risk of non-payment due to the
many of the inferential challenges that product not meeting agreed (but often time-
confront empirical researchers seeking to varying) standards or loss of crops during
estimate the determinants and smallholder shipping. However, firms also routinely
welfare effects of market channel complain that farmers sell to more lucrative
participation. markets (side selling) and fail to deliver
Key features that emerge repeatedly in product as agreed. Written contracts may
empirical study of smallholder participation in mitigate some of these problems in that they
evolving agricultural value chains include: the clearly offer documentation that either party
prominence of geographic placement and can use to try to enforce performance or
farmer selection effects (described in the box), restitution in the case of non-performance.
the heterogeneity of contract forms and There remains insufficient evidence, however,
terms, the effectiveness of farmer groups and as to what effect, if any, the use of formal,
cooperatives, and the highly varied but written contracts has on either performance
generally positive returns to farmers from or ex-post enforcement.
value chain participation conditional on being Overall, the picture across commodities
offered a contract. and countries is one of considerable
A recurrent factor that bears heavily on contracting risk faced by both parties and a
failed business ventures is the lack of market high rate of turnover from one year to the
information and analysis. For example next. To date, we know little about the
stakeholders, including the smallholders sustainability of modern value chain
themselves, often fail to understand the participation by smallholders, although the
impact of scaling up on individual markets. topic clearly demands attention.
Smallholders’ decisions to enter particular
markets are heavily influenced by the past
experience of others, entering in response to
the observed profits of early entrants and
historical prices. However, where initial
investments take some time to bear fruit, by
the time new production capacity comes
online, market saturation may undermine the
contract terms farmers face or increase the
risk of contract breach by buyers. Such buyers
Suppose a trader or a firm (retail or 2nd Stage: Farmer contracting choice. This output and/or investment in yield-stabilizing
wholesale) contracts with smallholders for choice consists of the identification by firms of inputs like irrigation, either of which
the provision of agricultural products. specific farmers or groups of farmers within generate gains to the farmer. Fourth, firms
Contracting entails multiple decisions that chosen geographic locations to whom can certify compliance with standards for
are played out simultaneously across particular contract terms are offered. For which distant consumers are willing to pay a
multiple locations and with multiple horticultural products, for example, access to premium. There is also some possibility that
smallholders in any given location, as well as irrigation so as to ensure proper water farmers strategically decline when offered
over time since all agents learn from past management is typically key. Membership in a good contracts, preferring to wait and
behaviours. Barrett proposes a four stage farmer organization or participation in an observe others’ experience with the contract
process: NGO extension programme can be other and thereby resolve some uncertainty about
inexpensive, easy-to-observe signals that help the benefits of the contract.
1st Stage: Geographic sourcing choice; the firm identify the best prospective suppliers.
assessment of candidate supply. The first- If selection occurred merely over observable 4th Stage: Firm and farmer choices to honour
stage geographic “placement” choice (where attributes of farmers, empirical correction contract. Having agreed to a contract, both
to buy from) is based on a combination of would be relatively straightforward. However, parties have an opportunity to renege on the
factors such as the agronomic suitability of the fact that a good deal of selection is almost agreement when it comes time to deliver and
the region to supply the crop in question at certainly based on unobservables – farmer skill, pay for the commodities as agreed. If one
the required volumes and quality, or its trustworthiness, contract status with party reneges, the other must decide whether
location in relation to key markets. These neighbours, etc. – significantly complicates the to expend effort and resources trying to
geographic placement effects heavily identification of determinants of firm contract enforce the contract. This is an area where
influence smallholder participation. Not all choice. farmer groups and NGO intermediation on
farmers have ready access to modern, behalf of smallholders may generate real
potentially remunerative value chains 3rd Stage: Once presented with a contract, benefits in so far as the capacity of the group
supplying distant markets. Those further from smallholders choose whether or not to accept to challenge – legally or politically – the firm is
ports and cities, those with less reliable the offer. This stage consists of an evaluation almost surely greater than that of individual,
communications and transport infrastructure, by the smallholder of whether to accept especially small-scale, suppliers.
and those in lower potential agronomic zones (ex-ante of product delivery) the terms of the
are least likely to be offered contracts. This contract. This choice generates a selection Source: Barrett, 2012
has strong potential implications for patterns effect that complicates precise estimation of
of spatial inequality, as producers in more the behavioral or welfare effects of value
favoured areas typically enjoy preferential chain participation. Why would farmers
access to higher-value marketing choose to accept an offered contract? First, it
opportunities, thereby reinforcing their initial may resolve market failures associated with
advantage. Understanding this choice imperfect markets. Second, the firm’s
enables the identification of interventions logistical capacity may generate economies of
that might feasibly expand buyers’ catchment scale or scope to the benefit of producers.
area and thereby enable greater smallholder Third, if the contract reduces farmer market
market participation. risk exposure, it can encourage increased
Part 3
Solutions for integrating
smallholders into the markets
M
ultiple programmes and approaches A chain provides a framework for showing
have been developed in support of how linked activities are performed,
promoting greater integration of evaluating performance, identifying barriers
smallholders into markets. The diagram to development (strengths and weaknesses
oppositeis illustrative of the wide variety of associated with different activities and
issues and perceived constraints that have linkages), and assisting in the identification of
been addressed by such approaches in seeking prioritized intervention. Chain analyses have
to develop the capacity to supply commodity been used to analyse a range of issues,
markets. These include, for example, those including:
that support capacity to increase productivity, • as an empirical tool for identifying
those that seek to reduce the cost of binding constraints to growth and
marketing, or those that are designed to assist competitiveness;
in improving the environment in which • to understand and promote market
stakeholders conduct their transformative and access for small scale producers;
transaction-related activities and thereby their • to determine the relative merits of
capacity to respond to capacity support different types of contractual
programmes. relationships between enterprises in a
Given the heterogeneity of smallholder chain;
participation in different markets illustrated in • to map the distribution of power and/or
the first two chapters of this report, greater benefits of interventions among
attention must be placed on mechanisms for stakeholders;
identifying the design and sequencing of • to identify approaches to improving
appropriate institutional solutions — such as value chain financing and/or risk
improvements to regulatory frameworks, management.
contract farming, farmer organizations or Their results have been used:
street markets — and provision of support • to promote enterprise development
services for alleviating key constraints faced through strategy formulation;
by different categories of producers. • to undertake situation analysis/ baseline
Value chain approaches provide a for benchmarking or monitoring;
framework for identifying key constraints and • for identification of actions for improved
considering appropriate solutions. A chain efficiency and performance of whole or
can be defined as “a set of interlinked components of chain;
activities and agents connected by flows of • for improved policy formulation and
resources, materials and information that implementation;
goes towards the production and trade of • for identification and formulation of
particular products”. This definition projects and related activities.
highlights: The term "value chain approach"
• the chain as a sequence of activities; therefore covers an array of potential options,
• the key focus on the linkages and including:
relationships that characterize the types • simple approaches to improved
of contractual arrangements and the understanding of constraints to improved
degree of coordination along the chain; competitiveness or profitability of chain
• the impacts of stakeholders’ activities activities;
and decisions on others in the chain; • analytical studies, for example to
• the importance of recognizing the determine the potential effects of
context in which the chain exists alternative policy interventions or
(economic, policy and institutional institutional innovations;
environment); • chain development related approaches
• that the chain is not isolated from the such as participatory chain diagnosis and
rest of the economy. strategy formulation.
Constrained Risky
Choice environment
- Subsistence needs
- Assets Decision- - Weather
- Prices
etc.
making etc.
Institutional Technological
solutions Catalysts solutions
F
armer organizations can be instrumental which prevent smallholders from taking
in improving rural livelihoods and, advantage of market opportunities.
ultimately, in enhancing food security. Institutional arrangements which facilitate
Numerous examples around the world cooperation of smallholders may:
demonstrate their benefits, but unfortunately • reduce transaction costs: transaction costs
they also show that their impact is often defined broadly as the “costs of using the
limited in scale and scope. price mechanism” for the acquisition of
Intra-group relationships, including local inputs or the selling of products include
associations and cooperatives, are common transportation, information gathering,
solutions to smallholder market access where negotiating, contracting, monitoring and
the institutional setting is weak. Through enforcing of contracts;
bonding relations, smallholders acquire • contribute to breaching market thresholds:
information and gain self-confidence to often smallholders lack sufficient volumes
analyse their own problems and to act of produce to cover the costs of market
collectively. transactions, but may be able to organize
Despite their potential, farmer themselves in groups to achieve market
organizations are sometimes not enough in thresholds;
themselves to improve market connectivity. In • facilitate smallholders access to production
those cases, bridging similar smallholder inputs: farmers’ groups may provide
organizations together (intergroup relations) inputs that otherwise would be
to form larger organizations in the form of inaccessible to smallholders, for example
producer unions, federations and networks due to cash flow deficits;
may provide the solution. • provide extension services: the knowledge
Institutions broadly defined are “the rules required for the adoption of certain
of the game” that play a key role in production technologies may not be trivial,
determining the degree of market but could be shared among producers
functionality. Institutional arrangements that organized into groups;
facilitate greater cooperation can help to • reduce risks and help smallholders to
tackle market failures, in particular those specialize: in seeking to stabilize their
The Integrated Tamale Fruit Company The Plataformas de Concertación , or simply Plataforma, are multi-stakeholder
(ITFC) is a Ghanaian and Dutch owned platforms, or alliances, which bring farmers together with a range of agricultural
company growing and exporting support service providers, including INIAP, local NGOs, researchers, universities and local
certified organic mangoes. The mangoes governments. The Plataforma is part of a comprehensive programme which involves
are grown on the company’s 155 hectare practical intervention that pays special attention to improving the participation of low-
nucleus estate and by 1200 outgrowers. income farmers in high-value producer chains by promoting their organization and social
The venture has received support from a capital accumulation. Through the Plataforma, smallholders develop a “value chain
number of development agencies and vision” of production and commercialization that directly links them with the market.
NGOs in building the capacity of the Research has shown (see Cavatassi et al., 2009), that the Plataformas programme
outgrowers in organic mango successfully improved the welfare of beneficiary farmers. Platformas achieves this success
production. The outgrowers are is through shortening and improving the efficiency of the value chain as well as through
organized in the Organic Mango the application of better agricultural techniques, thus decreasing transaction costs with
Outgrowers Association (OMOA). OMOA the former, and improving yields with the latter. The existence of social capital has
negotiates prices, contractual proved to be fundamental in implementing the programme which, through its
arrangements and benefits with ITFC. intervention, has strengthened the social tissue and has built or improved the capacity of
Outgrowers are provided with a long- farmers to link successfully to the market.
term no-interest loan in the form of
inputs such as equipment, seedlings and
organic fertilizer. Repayments begin
after five years from their sale of
mangoes to ITFC. After fourteen years
when the loan is repaid, growers can sell
their mangoes to any buyer they choose.
The ITFC provides support on technical
issues such as disease and pest control,
irrigation and certification and provides
a guaranteed market for the mangoes
produced. From the fifth year onwards,
growers are expected to earn profits of
around US$ 2000 per year. This compares
with an average farm income in the
Tamale area of around US$ 300 per year.
S
upport services define not just how well volumes flowing to those markets by
different markets function, but also the targeting productivity increases through
range of smallholder categories that are extension, reduction of production-related
able to participate in those markets. While the risks, facilitating access to seasonal credit and
provision of basic infrastructure and essential market-related infrastructure, particularly
services such as extension and facilitation of storage.
access to credit may suffice for more informal Market information services are designed
markets, as markets evolve and become more to better inform market participants.
formalized the type of support service Providing access to market information
required will change. Support services can improves understanding of markets and
become particularly complex for the upper makes them more transparent, which helps all
end of market formalization, namely for high participants engage more effectively in the
value added international food trade. The market. Market information services
support services that any specific category of commonly provide information on current
smallholder has access to will dictate, to a market prices of agricultural products and
large extent, the type of market in which he or inputs at different locations, allowing market
she is able and willing to participate. participants to choose the location offering
In most commodity sectors, markets exist the best price.
at different levels of formalization. Typically, Warehouse receipts systems can enable
informal markets for food staples are producers, farmer organizations or traders to
characterized by spot transactions in weak access secure and reliable storage, and can
and often volatile markets and appropriate provide them with documentary title to their
support services are aimed at increasing produce, which can be used to obtain
Warehouse Receipt Systems (WRS) have or the certificate of pledge, to the bank as The Regional Agricultural Trade
several positive attributes: they can security. In a system with just one receipt, Information Network (RATIN), hosted by
facilitate the link between storage and the farmer or trader can enter into a the Eastern Africa Grains Council (EAGC) is
finance; stabilize intra-seasonal prices; contract with a buyer, endorse the receipt a trade intelligence structure, hosted as a
increase producers’ ability to decide to the buyer and inform the warehouse web portal as www.ratin.net that
when to sell; reduce the pressure on operator. The buyer can then take delivery facilitates structured grain trading in
traders to rotate stocks; improve against the endorsed warehouse receipt. Eastern Africa. RATIN gathers and analyses
locational stock visibility and increase the In a double receipt system, the sale is data from producers, traders, and
efficiency of food reserve management. through the sale of the certificate of title. processors and other market information
The basic principles of warehouse In the double receipt system, when the sources and relays the processed
receipt systems are as follows. After trader or processor needs the crop, they information to the users. In doing so,
harvest, the farmer, cooperative or trader can redeem the certificate of pledge from investors risks are minimized and trade
delivers maize to a licensed warehouse. If the bank by repaying the original loan. interactions among its members and users
it meets certain quality parameters, it is The warehouse operator will then release improved, while enhancing more efficient
accepted, and the warehouse operator will the crop to the buyer against delivery of and cost effective intra-regional trade
deliver either one warehouse receipt both certificates. within the Eastern Africa region. Some of
specifying the quantity, or two separate However, in many African countries, the the market intelligence provided under
certificates (a certificate of title and a establishment of WRS has encountered RATIN within the eastern Africa region
certificate of pledge). The warehouse will difficulties including deficiencies in includes price discovery, production
release the stored maize only to the owner storage infrastructure; weak regulatory forecasts and supply, weather updates,
of the warehouse receipt in a single- frameworks; the limited capacity of economic outlook, trade opportunities,
receipt system, or the owner of both producers to deliver quantity and quality monthly price data analysis, regional food
documents if there is a double receipt on time; and limited involvement of balance sheets, policy guidelines, grades
system. The warehouse operator or an financiers. and standards requirements, and regional
approved agent will also issue a quality While successful examples of WRS exist trade flows. Further developments to the
certificate which has an expiration date. for higher value export commodities, for information system include a Warehouse
Beyond this date, the operator no longer example in Ethiopia, there has been volumes tracking system that will enable
takes any liability for the quality of the limited take off where WRS have targeted users to view volumes stored in various
stored crop, but until then, is fully liable food staples such as maize. warehouses per country in real time and
for both quality and quantity. When interactive maps with lists of all the
depositors wish to borrow against their markets, warehouses and border points
crop, they transfer the warehouse receipt, Adapted from Gross et al., (2011) that EAGC monitors.
I
n developed countries, large-scale, costs, and thereby insurance premiums, are
commercially orientated and well equipped reduced.
farmers are more able to manage price and Similar problems are faced in providing
weather-related risks through market-based protection to smallholders against price risks.
instruments such as futures markets or In addition to their often limited access to
weather-based insurance. Smaller farmers markets and knowledge, smallholders in
may lack access to the knowledge, assets, developing countries have virtually no
technologies, market instruments and possibilities of participating in futures
governance structures to adequately manage markets. Targeting smallholders for the cost-
their risks. In developing countries, effective use of financial risk management
smallholders with little capital, and limited tools such as futures contracts has proved
access to markets, often have little possibility extremely difficult. Even if aggregated across
to protect themselves against a variety of risks farmers, production is subject to problems of
which characterize less developed agricultural standardization and quality. Moreover, few
sectors. developing countries have functioning
In developing and emerging economies, commodity exchanges where farmers and
risk management by smallholders faces other market participants can hedge against
numerous challenges. Geographical price fluctuations of food staples. In addition,
dispersion of smallholders with limited access as domestic prices are often not strongly
to knowledge and markets can lead to high related to world market prices, due to high
operational costs for risk management transfer costs, producers are not able to utilize
programmes. Often, financial and insurance existing international commodities exchanges
markets accessible by smallholders do not to mitigate these risks.
exist, or are under-developed. Women The tools provided to assist in the
smallholders typically fare worst, as their mitigation or adaptation to risk will need to
access to assets, finance, extension or other differ according to the needs of these
risk management or coping instruments is producers. The use of market-based risk
generally even more limited than for other management tools in rural communities has
smallholders. been widely promoted by international
Many actions, such as the introduction of financial organizations and bilateral
disease-resistant varieties, irrigation and cooperation agencies. However, smallholders’
drainage systems can reduce the risk to degrees of participation in insurance and
which farmers are exposed. Market-based other formal risk-hedging schemes tends to
insurance mechanisms also provide a way to be low. Access to these products by
transfer risk and assist farmers in making smallholders is constrained by lack of
production decisions. Considerable effort information and proper understanding of
and research is being invested in developing these instruments, high transaction costs
innovations such as weather index-based relative to small volumes of trade and
crop insurance, which seeks to address the underdeveloped rural financial institutions
challenges of insuring smallholders. The that could act as intermediaries between
underlying concept is that farmers are paid farmers and insurance companies or
whenever rainfall or temperature is so high or international hedging markets
so low that it is likely to cause a significant fall Smallholders often mistrust risk
in crop yields, or whenever droughts, frost, or management tools and are more likely to
precipitation cross specific thresholds. The resort to informal risk management
measurement of these events is undertaken mechanisms to offset income variability,
using weather station data or even satellite including intra-household income transfers,
technology. The advantage of this approach carrying over stocks, shifting labour from farm
is that insurers do not need to make field level to off-farm, risk-sharing through community-
assessments and therefore administration based institutions such as cooperatives or
Developing country agriculture is characterized by many crops, periods and locations. The idea is to insure the cash advances
smallholders producing under conditions of substantial risk, which, of farmers for input purchases. The second product involves the
in conjunction with the absence of formal credit, restricts their insurance product above, but at the same time a bank loan that
ability to expand production through investment in improved covers the cost of inputs, as well as the premium of the insurance.
technologies. Weather index insurance provides a possible way out The beneficiary of the insurance policy is the bank itself, so if the
of this low productivity trap. However, stand-alone weather index weather index triggers, the bank is paid with certainty. The bank in
insurance contracts have met with indifferent demand and low turn lowers accordingly the repayment obligation of the farmer.
uptake by the intended beneficiary populations and will not EPIICA focuses on the existing agricultural supply chain, which is
address a lack of credit availability. However, if combined with composed of village level cooperatives of 200-300 farmers,
credit so as to provide a collateral substitute, may ease this supply organized in turn under Cooperative Unions (CUs), which are apex
side constraint. organizations of several individual village (Kebele) level
The Ethiopian Project on Interlinking Insurance with Credit in cooperatives. The CUs will serve as signatories on the interlinked
Agriculture (EPIICA) seeks to address this multiple market failure by loans, ensuring that they use their considerable power to ensure
explicitly interlinking rural credit with weather index insurance. that loans to this new private entity are repaid. In addition, the use
The project addresses supply-side issues by providing weather of the Unions as intermediaries helps to keep costs down by
insurance directly to the country’s major private bank, Dashen. exploiting existing supply chains to aggregate demand. The CUs
The bank becomes the beneficiary on a weather insurance policy, aggregate farmer demands for inputs and loans, from village
removing the dominant source of covariate risk from their cooperative level demands, which in turn aggregate individual
portfolio and enabling an expansion into agricultural financing farmer demands, and provide the lowest level direct contact with
that would otherwise be too risky. The project addresses demand- farmers, for both loans and inputs. Also, as the CUs are entities with
side constraints by marketing this interlinked product directly to the legal authority to contract with banks, they are much easier for
cooperativized farmers as a state-contingent loan. In the good formal financial institutions to deal with than individual village
state of nature the farmers will need to pay back the loan, the cooperative or smallholder farmers. Third, they can use their
premium payment on the insurance, and the interest on both, but extensive relationships with primary cooperative and farmers to
in the bad state of nature the farmers will owe nothing. By serve as enforcers of the loan contracts, minimizing default risks.
reducing the risk of weather-driven default for borrowers, it is Designing new credit and insurance contracts in a country with
hoped to crowd in credit demand and enable a first-order no private ownership of land and no history of private bank
expansion of agricultural productivity as farmers are able to use lending to agriculture is a challenge. The promise of the project,
credit to transition to a higher-risk, higher-yield farming however, is that by bringing together private sector financial
technology. institutions and a novel set of contracts, it may be possible to undo
There are two types of product that will be marketed to farmers. the interlocking set of market failures that have bedeviled
One is a stand-alone index insurance contract, that insures an smallholder farmers in this very risk-prone environment.
amount per hectare roughly equal to the cost of modern inputs
(fertilizer and seeds), and pays when rainfall in a nearby rainfall Feed the Future (2012).
station is below levels determined by water requirements for given http://www.feedthefuture.gov/model/index-insurance-innovation-initiative-i4
F
ollowing an extended period during A shift back towards a more active role
which many donors and does not however imply that support should
international organizations were be provided through direct intervention in
promoting a reduced role for the public markets. Rather, it envisages a facilitating role
sector in supporting agricultural whereby the public sector indirectly provides
development, there has been a growing support by working with and through the
appreciation of the need for a more private sector. This change in mind-set has
proactive role for the public sector that allowed greater focus on the identification
goes beyond creation of supportive legal and design of mechanisms through which
and policy framework and the provision public sector support, which includes not just
of improved infrastructure, the so-called government, but donors, international and
enabling environment. This is particularly regional organizations and NGOs, can be
so in contexts where, following the used to improve the incentives, and to reduce
withdrawal of the state under the disincentives, facing private sector actors
programmes of structural adjustment, in a way that allows policy goals such as
from agricultural marketing activities that improved provision of services to poor groups
had previously targeted smallholder and environmental protection, to be
farmers, market development has been achieved.
limited. Evidence from these episodes With increased attention, however, comes
suggests that markets don’t “naturally” increased scrutiny of the choices made by
improve their functionality with the policy makers particularly at a time of
passing of time and in the absence of significant constraints on already scarce public
public sector support (Thomas, 2007). sector budgets. This scrutiny is magnified
given the risks that inappropriate policy
interventions could create incentives for
producers to adopt environmentally and
Interventions to reduce barriers to socially damaging practices. Important
market participation
questions are therefore being asked in
relation to why public sector support is
Two types of policy interventions may be needed, where it should be focused, and
considered as examples of how the public when and how it should be provided.
sector can support the reduction of In determining how the public sector can
barriers to market participation: (i) the assist in removing constraints to market
public sector continues to pay for a participation, a first step is to understand the
service, but the private sector delivers it, characteristics of the market failures that are
examples of which might include creating them. Basic infrastructure and
extension and market information services such as research, extension, quality
systems, and/or (ii) the source of low assurance, market intelligence, and trade
willingness to pay for a service, which facilitation will, because of their public good
could be due to a lack of awareness of the nature, be underprovided by private sector
benefits of the good or service, could be actors who are themselves making decisions
addressed through demand stimulation. on the basis of market signals or incentives.
Examples of the latter include public Whilst funding for establishing basic
sector supported schemes for the delivery infrastructure and public goods is likely to
of appropriate levels and types of inputs remain a public sector responsibility, the role
such as fertilizer, seeds, or extension, for of the public sector in the management of
a pre-defined period of time during chain specific infrastructure (e.g. storage,
which the market develops. basic processing, quality assurance etc.)
needs to be supportive rather than “hands-
on”.
C
apital accumulation by smallholders is active role for the public sector that goes
a key constraint that prevents them beyond the creation of an enabling
from adopting new marketing environment for markets to develop is
strategies or production technologies increasingly acknowledged. This has allowed
required to increase production for sale in greater focus on the identification and design
markets. Approaches that enhance of mechanisms through which public support
smallholder access to finance necessary for can be used to leverage greater private sector
investments for increasing production have investment aimed at increasing smallholder
been extensively discussed in the market participation. These include examples
development literature2, but there has been whereby the public sector seeks to align
less discussion of investments by different incentives facing private sector actors with
categories of stakeholders in market public policy goals such as service provision to
development. This report focuses on a poor groups, and/or where the public sector
particular type of investment, the main takes on a risk sharing role to encourage
purpose of which is to increase the greater investment by the private sector.
connectivity of smallholders to markets. Governments may be restricted in their
Capital accumulation of this nature might capacity to engage in partnerships with a
include investments by farmers in assets such multitude of smaller market players due to
as mobile phones to enhance market their limited budgets. But can their efforts be
transparency, by traders in bicycles to reduce scaled up effectively using global value chain
transportation costs, or by processors in actors that serve a larger smallholder base? In
market developments that give smallholders other words, can PPPs incentivize global value
access to both inputs and outlets and secure a chains in ways that meet public policy
more consistent supply base. objectives? Key partners in global value chains
Market development generally requires have substantial bargaining power to set
coordinated investments by stakeholders at terms and conditions that suit their interests.
different stages in the value chain. For In this context, it has been recommended that
example, traders or processors by investing in public actors seek advice from people with
warehousing facilities can cause costs (and extensive private sector experience before
risks) for primary producers to fall. These engaging in such relationships.
producers will then invest to raise their Relationships between public and private
marketed surplus, in turn leading to further sector stakeholders can take many forms:
falls in unit costs for traders/processors. cooperatives that by law are granted
Intervention by government, for example, marketing board status; the contracting out
where tariff protection of the processed good by the state of private companies for building
reduces risks to traders or processors making transport infrastructure; multi-stakeholder
the initial investment may be required to kick fora to discuss trade standards.
start this cycle of coordinated investment. Finally, foreign direct investment (FDI) in
The previous section highlighted the public agriculture has gained prominence in recent
sector’s key role in creating a framework that years, and could be particularly relevant for
promotes the development of well- developing countries where the level of public
functioning competitive markets. But is this spending and overseas development aid in
enough to ensure sustained increases in agriculture has shown a declining trend over
traded volumes and by virtue, reduced price the last decades.
volatility in those markets? The need for an The last few years have seen a surge of
interest in international investment in the
agricultural and food sectors of developing
countries. Many developing countries in
2 See, for example, debates on microcredit or Africa and elsewhere are making strenuous
microfinance. efforts to attract such investments which are
I
t is pertinent to ask what role the some categories of smallholders, but can have
international community can play in negligible or even negative impacts on
supporting a broad-based transformation others. It was also shown in Part 2 that when
of smallholder agriculture. At global level the policy analysts have focused on policies for
international community can play a role in promoting smallholder market participation,
supporting the provision of principles, they have tended to emphasize
guidelines or legislation applicable to a large macroeconomic (e.g. trade or exchange rate)
number of signatory countries. This role can or meso-scale (e.g. roads, farmer groups)
take several forms, including awareness policies, while the growing empirical evidence
raising, analysis and monitoring , and rule- points strongly to microeconomic factors —
making. The notion of family farms and their especially households’ private asset
role in supplying local and global markets has endowments — as key determinants of
received significant attention in recent years, market participation, but in which significant
as witnessed by the declaration by the UN heterogeneity exists.
General Assembly of an International Year of Just as smallholders are heterogeneous, a
Family Farming in 2014. myriad of ways exist in which the international
Another example of awareness raising has community supports smallholder market
been the inclusion of smallholder agriculture integration. Their interventions, whether top-
on the agenda of the G20 for 2012 which has down or bottom-up, intentional or not, are
brought to the attention of the global inevitably effective only for specific categories
community the importance of bridging the of smallholders. Bottom-up interventions, for
productivity gap in smallholder agriculture in a example territorial approaches that empower
sustainable way. It stresses that measures to people and their communities to decide and
increase productivity will have little impact act on the pathway that they believe is right
unless participation in markets is for them, can disproportionally benefit those
correspondingly increased. In terms of categories of smallholders with greater
support to analysis and monitoring, the World influence in decision making processes.
Agricultural Watch, where the FAO, in Equally, top-down proposals, even where
partnership with France and IFAD, are smallholder heterogeneity is acknowledged
working towards a better understanding of and addressed, require as a starting point
agricultural transformation and smallholder either that a selected category of smallholder
issues around the world, provides another is identified, or that specific problems that
current example. apply to a selected category of smallholders
The international community also plays a are identified. Either way, interventions are
key role in the formulation of global level selective.
agreements. The negotiation of a Special Such observations also point to an urgent
Safeguard Mechanisms within the WTO need for improved governance of food
Agreeement on Agriculture provides an systems. Development-related processes
example of attempts to craft new trade rules affecting smallholder agriculture have
which better reflect the policy requirements become increasingly complex. The growing
of countries with significant numbers of plurality of actors with many new, more
resource poor producers. active and more diverse stakeholders and
In the context of such initiatives, this report interests, and more visible divergences in
seeks to create greater awareness of the power between interest groups, make
critical importance of recognising the inclusive processes difficult to manage
existence of smallholder heterogeneity in effectively. Increasing uncertainty in a number
making informed policy decisions. of dimensions ranging from those related to
Acceptance of smallholder heterogeneity the potential impacts of climate change, to
makes explicit the recognition that the actions of trading partners in an
interventions can have a positive impact on increasingly globalized world to the
I
n this report the critical importance of increasing appreciation that policy is set in a
better understanding the determinants of dynamic context and that there is a need to
smallholder producers’ decisions to better understand the policy environment and
participate in food staples markets when how this is changing both from short and long
formulating policy aimed at increasing levels term perspectives. As political processes
of productivity has been explained. Drawing develop, particularly in an era of limited fiscal
on FAO case study research to illustrate the resources, there is also increasing emphasis on
challenges that policy makers face in deciding transparency and the need to communicate
where to focus scarce public sector resources, with different constituencies.
the type of support required, and how best to Recently, a set of generically termed
provide that support, this report has drawn “Evidence-based approaches” have been
attention to the significant heterogeneity of developed which provide guidance and
smallholder market participation and to the advice on the kind of evidence that is relevant
many constraints and opportunities that to a specific policy issue, how it is to be treated
smallholders face, both in relation to their and how decisions are to be made using the
household specific characteristics and to the evidence in question. These approaches seek
diverse contexts in which they operate. not just to promote a shift from opinion-
While various solutions exist for facilitating based to evidence-based decision making,
smallholder integration into markets, a but recognize that evidence in itself is not the
number of which were described in Part 3, it is only factor that influences policy — by
clear that there is no “one size fits all” and definition policy-making is a political
that a more nuanced approach to policy process — and that its use can be resource
formulation, at the national and international intensive. As such, there needs to be a
levels, is required. In describing the complex sustained demand for evidence. A key
decisions facing policy makers, this report has objective of this report is to contribute to the
been careful not to prescribe specific generation of that demand.
interventions. This is primarily because such Evidence-based policy-making requires
interventions need to be specific to the that policy makers are receptive to evidence;
context in which they are made and that they understand the value of evidence;
underpinned by credible evidence. In the that evidence is seen as a necessity; and that
absence of information on many of the critical adequate time is given to its collation and use
determinants of smallholder market throughout the policy process.
participation decisions, investment in systems To better understand when and what type
of information generation, assimilation and of data are required, it is helpful to consider
use is key in facilitating a more nuanced the different steps in the policy cycle:
approach to policy intervention. In setting the agenda for policy
The use of information in arguing for policy intervention, information is required to
change, in formulating policy interventions identify critical problems, their magnitude and
and in monitoring their effectiveness is not to prioritize the problems. In assisting policy
new. However, the manner in which the formulation and policy choice, information
information is used, and the appropriateness can assist in delineating and making choices
and comprehensiveness of the information between policy options. In policy design and
can significantly affect the outcome of a implementation, evidence maybe needed to
policy process. help determine how to choose private sector
The way in which information is used is operators to engage in public-private
critical as policy development is generally partnerships, how to design the contract and
subject to competing vested interests and can how to ensure effective monitoring.
also be driven by pressure to act quickly. Recognizing that all policy is experimental,
Having access to robust evidence can be an information is also required for impact
important counterweight. There is also evaluation and policy evaluation.
Polic
y im
tion
scrip ple
m
e e
yd
nta
c
oli
tio
P
n
LA Y
TIO
RE
PO IZAT
MU LIC
Policy determination
AL
LIC ION
FOR PO
Polic
Y
y dissemination
POLICY
Po
licy
LEARNING g
orin
eva
luati y monit
on Polic
Moving towards greater use of evidence- In making the case for paying greater
based policy-making can minimise the risks of attention to the heterogeneity of smallholder
policy failure. However, as it has resource participation in markets, it is hoped that this
implications, there is pressure to use existing report promotes greater investment in the
evidence rather than to invest in the collection and use of appropriate evidence to
generation of appropriate evidence. The risk allow for informed prioritization and design of
in using existing evidence is that it is unlikely policy interventions that are cognizant of the
to be sufficient, it can be ambiguous and of constraints and opportunities faced by
uncertain quality, it may not be valid or different categories of smallholder operating
relevant, for example if based on research in widely different contexts.
undertaken at a global level and lacking in
context specificity.
1. Trends and impacts of foreign investments in developing country agriculture: evidence from case
studies (FAO, 2013).
2. The role of women producer organizations in agricultural value chains: Practical lessons from
Africa and India (Aziz Elbehri and Maria Lee, 2012).
3. Agricultural import surges in developing countries, analytical framework and insights from case
studies (Manitra Rakotoarisoa, Ramesh Sharma and David Hallam, 2011).
4. Articulating and mainstreaming agricultural trade policy and support measures (Ramesh Sharma
and Jamie Morrison (eds.), 2011).
5. Safeguarding food security in volatile global markets (Adam Prakash (ed.), 2011).
6. Why has Africa become a net food importer? (Manitra Rakotoarisoa, Massimo Iafrate and
Marianna Paschali, 2011).
7. Food Security in Africa: Market and Trade Policy for Staple Foods in Eastern and Southern Africa.
Alexander Sarris, and Jamie Morrison (eds), 2010). Edward Elgar Publishing and FAO.
8. The evolving structure of world agricultural trade: implications for trade policy and trade
agreements (Alexander Sarris, and Jamie Morrison (eds), 2009), FAO.
9. Biofuels and the sustainability challenge (Aziz Elbehri & Ana Segerstedt, 2013)
1. The development of global diets since ICN 1992: influences of agri-food sector trends and policies
(Mario Mazzocchi, Bhavani Shankar and Bruce Traill, 2012).
2. A contribution to the analyses of the effects of foreign agricultural investment on the food sector
and trade in Sub-Saharan Africa (Manitra A. Rakotoarisoa, 2011)
3. Food export restrictions: review of the 2007-2010 experience and considerations for disciplining
restrictive measures (Ramesh Sharma, 2011)
4. Resource-seeking Foreign Direct Investment in African Agriculture (Ann-Christin Gerlach and
Pascal Liu, 2010)
5. Commodity Market Review 2009-2010 (2010)
6. Hedging cereal import price risks and institutions to assure import supplies (Alexander Sarris,
2009)
7. The use of organized commodity markets to manage food import price instability and risk
(Alexander Sarris, Piero Conforti and Adam Prakash, 2009)
8. Agricultural Input Subsidies in Malawi: Good, Bad, or Hard to Tell? (Edward F. Buffie and Manoj
Atolia, 2009)
9. Rethinking agricultural input subsidy programmes in a changing world (Andrew Dorward, 2009)
Pedro Arias
David Hallam
Ekaterina Krivonos
Jamie Morrison
www.fao.org