Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
In a very real way, fears, concerns, anger and other such emotions, (regardless
what “seems not to be working”), show us that we are not fully living in the
present. If we were doing so, we would be quite unattached to a potentially
negative possibility that just “might” happen. It just might not, so being
concerned produces no discernable benefit (just like excited anticipation really
doesn’t make a good thing happen in any particular way). The idea is to live
now, not in the past or the future.
This whole thing is also about faith – confidence that the universe (or the Source,
or whatever you want to call it), with all of its extraordinary capabilities and
possibilities, can certainly find a way to effectively juggle those issues that we
seem to think are important and produce an outcome that we like. If one really
believes in the intelligence, resources, and benign, loving nature of the
environment in which we live, it’s impossible to conger up any situation that might
not turn out to be quite positive – even without our personal intervention.
So, love begets love. Fear begets fear. Joy begets joy. The principle is clear, is
it not? If you want more love in the world, you should love a lot – you should
spread it around. Plant it everywhere and allow it to grow. If you’re happy and
loving, you’ll not only be taken care of, but there are good indications that that
state is by far the most fertile for producing our most abundant and positive
futures.
The larger lesson here is that it is only when we, as individuals and as groups,
learn to consistently live in a space of happiness and proliferating love, will we be
able to change not only ourselves, but our world. It’s like a virus – if we start to
broadcast love and happiness we’ll be contagious – it will change those around
us. It will infect the rest of the human organism. If we do it right, everyone will
become sick with love . . . which is not all bad. (Well, probably not everyone –
but enough to make a really big difference.)
What I’m proposing is not particularly easy. We live in a world full of institutions,
conventions and common perspectives that try to assert control over various
aspects of our lives, often specifically arguing for behavior and constraints that
are antithetical to love and happiness. They tell us what we should and shouldn’t
do and then generate fear about painful implications that will certainly materialize
if we don’t do as they say. Whether it is the government, society, religions,
families, advertisers, employers, or those pitching concepts and ideas (like
academics and pundits), more often than not their basic objective is to change
what you naturally might otherwise want to do or think. Rather than being open,
enabling and encouraging they want you to do what they think is right. It’s about
control.
The first step of moving out of this space is therefore to understand that one
cannot go to a different place without moving. If you keep doin’ what you’re
doin’, you’ll keep gettin’ what you’re gettin’. If your approach to life is essentially
defined by others – remaining the product all of the institutions and messages
that are telling you what you should and shouldn’t do – then that’s what you will
be: defined by others. Alternatively, each of us can begin decide to think for
ourselves, letting our behavior be essentially shaped by feelings like love and
happiness.
Some might find this simplistic, idealistic, and naïve. But that’s only if you look at
it from the perspective of the way the current world works. If you think things will
never change or are unchangeable, then you’re right. But, if your objective is to
consider how we might rise to a new level of humanity and society, then the old
way of looking at things will, by definition, be unenlightened. We need a new
framework.
It’s more complicated than I have space to here to explicate, but my guess is that
this fresh mindset would result in a new set of principles for society – for humans
living together. What could well emerge would be a commitment to things like
cooperation, sustainability, interdependence or oneness, personal development,
and resilience, et. al., concepts that we find familiar but, in this case they would
be wrapped in a new semantic context. Since our problems are a direct
derivative of how we see ourselves and our world, seen through the lens of love
and happiness, this paradigm would explain ourselves and our world in a
radically different way that would undermine many of the biggest issues that we
have today.
Perhaps a step in the right direction might be a variation on the old principle that
has deep validity for groups of individuals trying to effectively live with each other:
live and let live. There’s a new corollary: love and let love.