John Mark Hentges Phone: 918-607-1790

c/o postal service address: General Delivery-413 Main Street, Madison Lake, Minnesota [56063]

September 22, 2017

Tony Cornish
State Representative
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

Dear Mr. Cornish

My five children and I are victims of over 10-years of nonstop injustice and state oppression. I,
like Sandra Grazzini-Rucki and many others, am a victim of injustice in Minnesota, where many
judges, attorneys, and other officers of the courts, are “fixing”1 court cases for profit.

Today, I listened to an audio recording (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gXzDYQ-N3Q) in

which, after Tim Kinley explained the situation in Sandra's case and requested a hearing for
victims of injustice in Minnesota, you stated: [at 4:51] “I'm about the worst person in the world
you can come to ask for a hearing on, and claim that our courts are corrupt … [at 6:00] I don't
know; I guess we have a big disconnect; I don't see the corruption that you do … [at 6:10] I've
been hearing about it for, I had two people come all the way down to Good Thunder to talk
about the same subject … [at 6:30] I'm just not interested—that's the bottom line; I just don't
want to have a hearing like that … ”

When Dede Evavold explained how she—like Sandra and me and many others in Minnesota's
First Judicial District—is a victim of malicious prosecution, was denied due process across the
board and railroaded into a false conviction and sentence, and now Dakota County is again
acting above the law and outside their authority to deny the right to fully execute sentences, you
stated: [at 10:30] “What would they say if I asked them if they were breaking the law? [Dede
stated that they would of course deny it] and that's the problem that I run into … [Tim asked,
'What is the law'?] Well, if they broke it, you mean, if the prosecutor broke it? Then he should be
prosecuted, but that's the whole problem … how do we … I can't say who's right or wrong … ”

And when Tim Kinley reiterated the duty of the legislature to impeach wayward judges—[at
11:00] “the House hears the case … and if they are impeached the Senate tries it … ”—you
stated: [at 11:15] “ … this is the whole thing with me, is that the complaints usually come from
somebody that felt they were wronged, and they want to right it … and I'm supposed to believe
that somehow the whole system went wrong … ”

Although you agreed to read Mr. Kinley's materials, it didn't sound as though you were, or will
be, persuaded to take any action. Please reconsider.

It is high-time that ethical lawmakers, judges, and officials of all stripes, wise up and stand up to
the criminal factions in our government, who have literally taken over our state and federal
courts here in Minnesota, as well as many of our local, state and federal government offices, and
1 See www.prosealliance.org/case-fixing

1
are operating them like a mafia. They are “fixing” court cases for profit. They are racketeering.
They are laundering federal funding. They are stealing property. They are destroying families.
And when their victims fight back, they criminalize and railroad their victims on false charges.
Even laymen can see that they are wildly breaking the law.

As you know, all of this is done 'under color of law' and the criminals in law enforcement and in
other offices—going all the way up the chain-of-command to the offices of the highest-
authorities in all three branches of our government—obstruct justice, or, at the very least,
knowingly look the other way, in support of the racketeering and other treasonous crimes. And,
as you also know, the traitors have created immunity for themselves, have manned the judicial
review boards, have taken away the public's access to grand juries, and have done away with all
other mechanisms to hold them accountable, so that they can operate with total impunity.

More and more Americans are finding out about the “Shadow Government” and those who are
carrying out their crimes. We are researching. We are learning. We are educating others. We are
joining forces. We will soon be taking back our courts and government offices.

Even if, in the past, you bought in to their legislation rigging methods to enhance their revenue
generation schemes and maximize their thefts, you would be foolish to continue supporting their
hidden agendas. I would suggest that, if you are truly a good and ethical lawmaker, you begin
doing your own research, secretly meeting with others who are learning the truth, and preparing
to take on the traitors (at the proper time) and take back the General Assembly in behalf of over 5
million unsuspecting Minnesotans, who are going to be quite upset when they learn about the
treason.

So that you can begin to realize the scope of the racketeering and other treasonous crimes being
committed in Minnesota's First Judicial District, which I am sure is taking place to some degree
statewide, I am attaching:

1. A one-page summary of the injustices committed against my family;

2. A one-page article about Judge Ciavarella's 28-year sentence for fixing cases; and
3. Several Criminal Complaints sent to Minnesota's Highest-Authorities (without referenced
exhibits).

When you have read these documents, I would like to meet with you about the following:

1. Protection from further harm for myself and all other victims of injustice in Minnesota;
2. Impeachment proceedings against all judges named in my criminal complaints;
3. Removal proceedings against all other officials named in my criminal complaints; and
4. Whatever other actions are necessary to correct the record in my cases and bring the
traitors to justice.

Please call me at your earliest convenience.

Thank you in advance for your time,

John Mark Hentges

2
 THE John Mark Hentges FAMILY'S ONE-PAGE SUMMARY

In 2006 my family was destroyed in a “fixed” divorce in Jefferson County, Colorado. My five children
and I are victims of numerous state and federal crimes over the past decade in what can only be
described as “crime sprees” by judicial, administrative, law enforcement and other public officials in
Colorado, Minnesota, and Washington D.C., who are “fixing” court cases for profit, racketeering,
stealing property, laundering public funds, and committing all sorts of other treasonous crimes.

Everything I had from 25-years of backbreaking work—including my children, my semi-retirement, my

paid-off home and business headquarters on 27 acres, my workshop, my business assets, my marital
assets, my premarital assets, eight vehicles, my inheritances, and my personal property—was stolen or
taken from me with the stroke of the divorce judge's pen; and additionally, despite all involved knowing
that my child support obligations are paid-in-full, I was ordered to pay monthly child support in an
amount that was more than I was earning in my semi-retirement, I was relentlessly pursued to pay my
child support again, I was repeatedly denied credit for payments made toward child support, I was
repeatedly denied review and reconciliation of my child support account, my driver's license was
suspended, I was impoverished, I was falsely arrested four times, and I was literally driven out of
Colorado when the “case fixers” found out that I was reporting their crimes.

In Minnesota, the known void Colorado child support order and known false arrears balance were
unlawfully registered for enforcement; and, despite all involved knowing that my child support
obligations are paid-in-full, I was relentlessly pursued to pay my child support again, I was repeatedly
denied review and reconciliation of my child support account, I was framed as a “Deadbeat Dad,” I was
falsely arrested six more times, I was falsely convicted for felony nonsupport of my children, I was
falsely imprisoned for over 8 months, I was cruelly ordered to have no contact with my children,
including my 3 adult children at the time, I was repeatedly denied appellate review, ten appeals were
fixed against me, and the case fixing and other crimes against my family have continued to this day.

As I know now, many federal courts and government offices in Colorado and Minnesota are also
involved in the case fixing; and, instead of overseeing the state courts and offices as they are required to
do, obstructed justice and saw to it that my many civil and criminal claims, petitions, and requests for
reconciliation of my federal “Title IV-D” child support case, were left unresolved. In 2016, six more
federal lawsuits were “fixed” and wrongly dismissed to prevent the reunification of my family.

In addition to, and as a result of, the rampant unchecked case fixing and other crimes against our family
by officers of the courts and government officials in both states, each of my children is also a victim of
over 10 years of extreme and relentless psychological child abuse known as “parental alienation” by
their mother and her sisters and friends, and I am a victim of over 10 years of domestic violence,
according to Colorado law.

As a result of the decade-long crime and child abuse sprees against our family, my children and I have
been separated and cutoff from most communications with each other for over 10 years.

To date, in dealing with the never-ending state and federal crime sprees against my family, I have written
over 800 letters, I have made over 1000 telephone calls, and I have submitted over 700 court documents,
to authorities in Colorado, Minnesota and Washington D.C., but have never received even a sliver of
justice or protection for my family; in fact, not one of my hundreds of civil claims has ever been heard,
adjudicated or redressed in any way, and not one of my hundreds of criminal claims has ever been
investigated, charged or prosecuted.

For more information, visit www.federalmcc.webs.com.

 http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-08-11-pa-courthouse-kickbacks-sentence_n.htm

Pa. judge gets 28 years in 'kids for cash' case

SCRANTON, Pa. (AP) — A longtime northeastern Pennsylvania judge was ordered to
spend nearly three decades in prison for his role in a massive juvenile justice bribery scandal
that prompted the state's high court to toss thousands of convictions.
Former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. was sentenced Thursday to 28 years in
federal prison for taking $1 million in bribes from the builder of a pair of juvenile detention
centers in a case that became known as "kids for cash."
Ciaverella, 61, was motionless when the decision was announced and had no reaction. From
behind him, where family members of some of the children he sentenced sat, someone cried out
"Woo hoo!"
In the wake of the scandal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court tossed about 4,000 convictions
issued by Ciavarella between 2003 and 2008, saying he violated the constitutional rights of the
juveniles, including the right to legal counsel and the right to intelligently enter a plea.
Ciavarella was tried and convicted of racketeering charges earlier this year. His attorneys
had asked for a "reasonable" sentence in court papers, saying, in effect, that he's already been
punished enough. "The media attention to this matter has exceeded coverage given to many and
almost all capital murders, and despite protestation, he will forever be unjustly branded as the
'Kids for Cash' judge," their sentencing memo said.
Al Fora, Ciaverella's lawyer, called the sentence harsher than expected. Ciaverella
surrendered immediately but it was not immediately known where he would serve his sentence.
Ciaverella, speaking before the sentence was handed down, apologized to the community
and to those juveniles that appeared before him in his court. "I blame no one but myself for
what happened," he said, and then denied he had ever incarcerated any juveniles in exchange for
money.
He also criticized U.S. Assistant Attorney Gordon Zubrod for referring to the case as "kids
for cash," and said it sank his reputation. "He backdoored me, and I never saw it coming. Those
three words made me the personification of evil," Ciaverella said. "They made me toxic and
caused a public uproar the likes of which this community has never seen."
Federal prosecutors accused Ciavarella and a second judge, Michael Conahan, of taking
more than $2 million in bribes from the builder of the PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care
detention centers and extorting hundreds of thousands of dollars from the facilities' co-owner.
Ciavarella, known for his harsh and autocratic courtroom demeanor, filled the beds of the
private lockups with children as young as 10, many of them first-time offenders convicted of
petty theft and other minor crimes.
The judge remained defiant after his arrest, insisting the payments were legal and denying
he incarcerated youths for money.
The jury returned a mixed verdict following a February trial, convicting him of 12 counts,
including racketeering and conspiracy, and acquitting him of 27 counts, including extortion. The
guilty verdicts related to a payment of $997,600 from the builder.
Conahan pleaded guilty last year and awaits sentencing.
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims of government abuse in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties),

Plaintiffs,

v. CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

TRAITORS,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually, in behalf of my five children, and in behalf
of other victims of government abuse in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties, bring this criminal
complaint against “traitors” i in Minnesota who are fixing court cases for profit, and state:
THIS CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
INTRODUCTION
1. This criminal complaint is sent to you, our leaders, because most if not all of the
judges, prosecutors, public defenders, probation/parole agents, law enforcement officials, human
service officials, court administrators, and other officers and cronies of the courts in the First and
Fifth Judicial Districts are blocking my access to our courts to cover up their treasonous crimes.

1
 2. In behalf of my family and other victims of Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties, I seek
crime victim services, witness protection, grand juries and special prosecutors, jurisdiction and
venue for all our civil and criminal complaints, adjudication of our claims, and ultimately to take
back control of our local governments, courts and law enforcement.
3. My demands in behalf of my family, which follow my affidavit, are to be fulfilled
immediately; DEMANDS #1 and #2 must be completed by July 31, 2012.
4. This criminal complaint is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
AFFIDAVIT
5. I, victim and affiant JOHN M. HENTGES, am a citizen of the state of Minnesota,
Nicollet County, and presently reside at 603 N. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082; my five
children*, B.W.H., T.J.H., N.A.H., C.M.H., and A.N.H., presently reside in Jefferson County
Colorado. (*All of my children were minors when the crime spree in Minnesota began.)
6. OTHER VICTIMS in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties are named in this complaint
and I will be helping them obtain justice for their families; the number of victims in Minnesota is
in the thousands and similar criminal complaints will follow in many of the other counties.
7. The “TRAITORS” named herein, and to be named in future complaints, which also
likely number in the thousands, have formed criminal racketeering factions within our local,
state and federal government offices.
8. My five children and I are victims of several very serious crimes over the past seven
years in an intense and relentless “crime spree” by judicial, law enforcement and other public
officials in Colorado and Minnesota, who are “fixing”ii court cases for profit.
9. Our family was destroyed in a “fixed”iii divorce in Colorado in 2006.
10. Everything I had, including my children, my paid-off home and business headquarters
on 27 acres, my business assets, my inheritances, and my personal property, was stolen from me.
11. And now, the case fixers in both states are working together to hold hostage my kids,
my life, and resolution to the issues they caused because of my evidence.
12. Everyone involved then, and over the past 7 years (over 100 government officials),
knows the basic facts of the case:
a. My wife Carol and I grew up in St. Peter, Minnesota, have known each other for nearly 40
years, were in a relationship for 22 years, and were married for 15 years;
b. We moved to Colorado in the early 1980s and were married on October 6, 1990;
c. We have 6 children; 5 of which are living;
d. Early in our marriage, in what we referred to as our “Grand Plan,” Carol and I agreed that
she would take care of the domestic chores and I would run my small construction business for
everyday expenses, invest in real estate, build our family’s homes, and strive to payoff all debts;
and, if accomplished, I would semi-retire and we would reverse roles;
e. I worked double-time hours (over 80 hours/week) for much of my 25-year career,
essentially cramming two careers into one to reach our goals, so that I could spend the maximum
amount of time possible with our kids while they were growing up, as I had a lot to teach them;
f. I accomplished our Grand Plan in April 2000 when I finished building our 3 rd home on 27
acres in the foothills just up from Denver and, shortly thereafter, paid off all our debts;

2
 g. In addition, I had ample savings and equity at the time to pay any other financial
obligations for my children’s entire upbringing;
h. In 2002, I began semi-retiring and role reversing with Carol;
i. Prior to Carol’s divorce in 2005, I was our children’s primary care taker and attended all of
the parent/teacher conferences and other school events, most of our 4 boys’ soccer games, most of
our children’s other activities, and most religious events;
j. Between 2002 and 2005, I improved the property in preparation for my home-based part-
time business of making log structures, such as gazebos, decks, bridges, and furniture; and I
harvested and draw-knifed hundreds of logs.
k. My business was headquartered on the property and the 27 acres has 1000s of trees and
would have provided a lifetime supply of wood for my projects;
l. My semiretirement income was less than $20,000.00 per year, but was sufficient to pay all
the bills since our mortgage and other debts were paid-off and we heated our house with wood;
m. My child support obligations are paid-in-full.
13. “Child support” is defined as the parents’ responsibility to provide for the basic needs
of their minor children, which are shelter, food, clothing, and education; and because I had paid
my financial obligations for my children’s entire upbringing, in full, until adulthood, prior to
Carol’s divorce in Colorado, my child support obligations are paid-in-full.
14. But despite the facts, I have been illegally pursued in Colorado and Minnesota for 6
years to pay my child support obligations again so the counties can obtain federal funding.
15. Driven by the prospects of extra profits and federal funding in family law and the
criminal justice system, the Colorado case fixers:
a. Churned Carol’s divorce (First Judicial District case 05DR212) to diminish my resources;
b. Allowed my mentally ill wife to commit crime after crime after crime against me;
c. Allowed Carol and her friends and sisters to emotionally abuse our children, to repeatedly
violate the parenting time order, to repeatedly violate Colorado law requiring “frequent and
continuing contact,” and to do many other illegal things to alienate me from my family;
d. Allowed Carol, her attorney, the “Child and Family Investigator,” law enforcement, and
others, to frame me as a bad dad and husband, and defraud the record regarding every material fact;
e. Converted nearly all my life’s work (about 95% of the family estate) to Carol despite the
fact that she and her two sisters in Minnesota had been stealing from me all through marriage;
f. Granted Carol near-full custody and sole decision-making responsibility for our children
despite the fact that she and her two sisters and many Colorado friends were emotionally abusing
them all through the divorce to turn them against me;
g. Grossly inflated the child support order by “imputing” an income for me into the child
support calculations that was over 4 times my semiretirement income, which caused the order to be
more than I was earning;
h. Awarded Carol nonexistent attorney’s fees and other orders totaling over $30,000.00 to
wipe me out financially; and
i. Then in the post-divorce, allowed Carol to continue holding the little I was awarded
including my tools for work, established Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement case 30-289499-
44-1A for Carol knowing she was ineligible, altered the child support balance, refused credit for
$30,000 in payments made toward child support, suspended my driver’s license, ruined my credit
and levied my bank accounts, all without due process, stole $5,500.00 from my children’s trust
account, stole my remaining resources, diminished my retirement savings to zero, refused to
review, adjust and modify the child support order, falsely arrested me three more times,
impoverished me and literally drove me out of Colorado to protect myself from further harm.
16. I moved back to Minnesota in May 2007.

3
 17. Driven by the same prospects of extra profits and federal funding in child support
enforcement and the criminal justice system, the Minnesota case fixers:
a. Registered the known void and fictitious Colorado child support order and known false
arrears balance in Minnesota (First Judicial District case 40-FA-07-1253);
b. Repeatedly denied me due process and equal protection under the law;
c. Repeatedly conspired against my rights;
d. Framed me as a “Deadbeat Dad” (First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786);
e. Falsely charged me with ‘non-support’ of my children;
f. Falsely arrested me two more times;
g. Imposed excessive bail on me;
h. Maliciously prosecuted me;
i. Defrauded the jury and decided the case for the jury;
j. Converted the jury trial into a bench trial and had me falsely convicted;
k. Falsely imprisoned me for four months;
l. Cruelly and unusually punished me with a sentencing order that included an illegal ‘No
Contact” order preventing me from talking to or seeing my own children;
m. Literally terrorized me for several years under constant threat of another false arrest;
n. Recently issued another false arrest warrant on a known false charge and, through law
enforcement in Nicollet County, caused my 7th false arrest; and
o. Are now joining forces with case fixers in the Fifth Judicial District to block my access to
the courts and to continue holding hostage my kids, my life, and resolution because of my evidence.
18. I have reported the crime spree along the way to:
a. The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department in Colorado;
b. The Jefferson County District Attorney’s Office;
c. The Attorney General’s office in Colorado;
d. The Governors’ offices in Colorado;
e. My children’s state and U.S. legislators in Colorado;
f. The Federal Bureau of Investigation;
g. The U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Marshals, and federal judges in both states;
h. The U.S. Department of Justice;
i. The Le Sueur County Sheriff’s Department in Minnesota;
j. The Le Sueur Police Department;
k. The Nicollet County Sheriff’s Department in Minnesota;
l. The St. Peter Police Department;
m. The Attorney General’s office in Minnesota;
n. The Governors’ offices in Minnesota;
o. My state and U.S. legislators in Minnesota; and
p. All district and appellate court judges involved in my cases in both states.
19. In dealing with the crime spree in child support enforcement over the past 6 years, I:
a. Have filed over 250 court documents;
b. Have written over 400 letters;
c. Have made (and tape-recorded) over 575 phone calls;
d. Submitted over 10 criminal complaints 1 to local, state, and federal authorities in both states;
e. Submitted my PETITIONS2 TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA SUPREME
COURTS (my “PETITION BOOK”) to the high courts in both states;
1
Along with thousands of pages of documentary evidence so that immediate charges could have been made, but
despite knowing that there was more than probable cause to believe that many crimes had been committed against
my family all public officials involved neglected their duties and some committed further crimes against my family.

4
 f. Submitted in Colorado my COMBINED3 VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION,
FIRST CIVIL COMPLAINT, AND FIRST CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (“MY DIVORCE”).
20. However, not one of my hundreds of claims has ever been adjudicated in either state.
21. The facts have never been refuted and my evidence has never been rebutted.
22. Following my false conviction by the Minnesota case fixers on March 1, 2011, I
requested help for my suffering family from Minnesota Court of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew
E. Johnson through my appeals from decisions in case 09-786, through my PETITION BOOK to
the high courts in both states, and more recently through my pleadings from jail earlier this year,
but despite knowing all about the case fixing, knowing that I can prove it, and knowing that my
five children and I are crime victims, Chief Judge Johnson and Minnesota Supreme Court Chief
Justice Lorie S. Gildea have dismissed all my appeals and petitions on technicalities and have
totally omitted their duties to my family in support of the case fixers.
23. In May 2011, just after submitting my PETITION BOOK in both states:
a. Two black suburban-like SUVs came to my place in Le Sueur and at least two plain-
clothed federal agents and a uniformed Minnesota state patrolman, obviously knowing that my
front door was broken, came to my backdoor;
b. Unbeknownst to them, I witnessed the event from the place next-door;
c. One of the federal agents pounded on my backdoor several times;
d. The other federal agent had his hand on his gun ready to draw it;
e. The Minnesota patrolman just stood there, looking dumbfounded;
f. On information and belief, the federal agents were there to kill me because of my evidence
and the patrolman was just as alarmed as I was to witness it;
g. Ever since then, in addition to my “fear of the next knock on my door by our corrupt and
out-of-control federal government,” which is being run like a mafia, I now fear for my life.
24. Due to the corruption at the Minnesota Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and
because of the Minnesota Attorney General’s office’s refusals to do their duties or even read my
petitions or respond to my letters and complaints, I sent another copy of my PETITION BOOK to
the Minnesota Governor’s office and followed up with several letters to Governor Dayton in the
summer of 2011, but no one in his office would respond either.
25. Because no public official in Minnesota would do their duties even after seeing the
evidence in my PETITION BOOK, the crime spree in case 09-786 continued:

2
PETITIONS FOR EN BANC REVIEW, PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (Colorado), PETITION
FOR RECONCILIATION AND CLOSURE OF TITLE IV-D CASE, and PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT (Minnesota), along with 450 pages of documentary evidence proving most of the 189 denials of due
process, 41 acts outside authority, 189 frauds upon the court, and 109 crimes, alleged therein, committed against my
family in the states’ never-ending pursuit to force me to pay my child support again so the governments can obtain
federal funding. My PETITION BOOK sought Rule 60 and other relief, which would have ended all matters, but
both high courts completely ignored the facts, the evidence, the law, their duties, and my family’s safety, to assist
the case fixers in their state in avoiding the charges they deserve.
3
First Judicial District case 2011CV5400: “MY DIVORCE” was filed along with 308 pages of documentary
evidence proving most of the 353 specific acts of child abuse against my kids and 334 specific acts of criminal
misconduct or spousal abuse against me, alleged therein, committed against us by my mentally ill wife and her
sisters and hardcore feminist friends; and also alleging and proving some of the 541 negligent acts or omissions by
officials in Colorado in dealing with the crime and child abuse sprees, which still persist to this day. The case fixing
criminal who fixed Carol’s divorce in 2006, judge Stephen Munsinger, is now the chief judge. Judge Christopher
Munch is currently fixing MY DIVORCE against me and will not respond to any of my pleadings.

5
 a. In August 2011, prosecutor Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer and judge M. Michael Baxter
conspired, illegally seized the $5,000.00 a relative posted to bail me out of jail when case 09-786
began, and gave the money to my wife knowing that she had stolen an enormous amount of money
from me and had committed and was still committing serious crimes against me;
b. On December 16, 2011, I was falsely arrested for the sixth time;
c. On February 7, 2012, I was sentenced by Baxter, who was clearly acting outside his
authority, as he had been automatically disqualified iv from the case following his first crime;
d. In conspiracy with Zehnder Fischer, my probation agent Julia Kraemer, my wife Carol, and
others, Baxter included a cruel ‘No Contact’ order in the probation conditions to prevent me from
contacting Carol and ‘her’ children, knowing that my kids and I had been separated for nearly 5
years and had been cutoff from all communications with each other for over 3-½ years;
While in jail:
e. I discovered several more case fixing tactics, see endnote iii, and heard from many other
victims (my evidence and testimony can now be attested by multiple sources);
f. Le Sueur court and law enforcement officials completely blocked my access to the courts,
denied my rights as an indigent, denied my right to counsel, denied my right to represent myself
and file my own court documents, and returned my counterclaim and several other pleadings;
g. The Minnesota Attorney General’s office failed to answer my counterclaim, and refused
again to intervene in the ongoing crime spree, as Minnesota’s highest law enforcement authority;
h. Baxter and chief judge Lynch, in separate orders, labeled me a “frivolous” and “vexatious”
litigant and illegally banned me from all courts in the First Judicial District;
i. Minnesota Court of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson found out about the ongoing
case fixing from my pleadings, discovered from my habeas corpus pleadings that I was being
unlawfully detained, and saw evidence of the past case fixing in my PETITION BOOK, but instead
of helping my defenseless family, he dismissed my “appeal” and ordered the appellate clerks to
notify the case fixers of my ex parte pleadings and block my access to the appellate courts;
j. Minnesota Supreme Court Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules, who also ignored my pleas
and evidence, repeatedly un-filed my pleadings and sent them back to me at the jail stating that I
was not properly before the court (but never told me how a crime victim is supposed to act);
k. I found out from other inmates that Minnesota Department of Correction Probation/Parole
Agent Julia Kraemer and other agents are actively engaging in the case fixing by “violating” clients
on false charges; and Public Defender Rick Lea and other public defenders are notoriously setting
up and scaring indigents into accepting unfair plea deals conspired with the prosecutors;
l. Despite my approved indigent status, jail administrator Larry Sykes charged me nearly
$400.00 for copies and refused my repeated requests for an escort to the court; and
m. Jail guard Jason Squires witnessed several crimes by Sykes, Baxter, and court administrator
Joanne Kopet to totally deny my access to the courts, and several other crimes against others, but
failed to report any of the crimes.
26. I was unlawfully detained in the Le Sueur County jail for a total of 120 days.
27. I was released on April 8, 2012.
28. On April 13, relatives who had been supporting me since January 2007 allowed me to
move into a house they own in St. Peter, which is for sale.
29. Unbeknownst to me, on April 17, Kraemer, in conspiracy with Baxter and Zehnder
Fischer, “violated” me for not signing my Probation Agreement (which all knew was void for
several reasons), issued a warrant for my arrest, and began conspiring with Nicollet County
officials shortly thereafter to falsely arrest me.
30. My appeal from the verdict and sentence was filed on May 7, 2012.

6
 31. The case fixers were notified of my new address in the NOTICE OF APPEAL.
32. According to Minnesota law, an appeal automatically suspends the sentence and
reinstates the pretrial bail conditions4.
33. On May 11, 2012, my First Civil Complaint and Summons, two copies of a Notice
and Acknowledgement of Receipt of Complaint and Summons, and a self-addressed postage-
prepaid return envelope, were served by mail upon the state of Minnesota pursuant to the
Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4.03(d); see Fifth Judicial case 52-CV-12-366.
34. The Minnesota Attorney General’s office failed to answer the complaint.
35. Therefore, I won by default on June 4, 2012.
36. According to Minn. R. Civ. P. Rule 55.01, I am entitled to all of the relief requested
in my First Civil Complaint:
a. A finding that my child support obligations are paid in full;
b. A finding that the Colorado child support order, the arrears balance, and the Minnesota
registration order were obtained by fraud;
c. An order declaring the Colorado child support order, the arrears balance, and the Minnesota
registration order null and void;
d. An order vacating the Colorado child support order, the arrears balance, and the Minnesota
registration order;
e. An order closing Interstate Title IV-D case 30-289499-44-1A;
f. An order to the state of Minnesota to provide me a “Letter of Clearance” so that I can
reinstate my driver’s license;
g. Reimbursement for my expenses ($78,536.00) in asserting my family’s rights; and
h. Such other and further relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
37. Had Fifth Judicial District judge Allison L. Krehbiel done her duties in case 12-366,
the crime sprees in both states would have immediately ended.
38. But instead, and despite receiving a copy of my PETITION BOOK and detailed ex
parte pleadings describing the ongoing case fixing and the new “arrest warrant scandal,” and
despite now knowing for a fact that my children and I are victims of several serious crimes,
Krehbiel refused to pronounce default judgment in my favor and started a standoff by St. Peter
and Nicollet County law enforcement and other officials that persists to this day.
39. Due in large part to Krehbiel’s criminal neglect, the Le Sueur County criminals
brought their crime spree to Nicollet County:
a. At 8:52pm on June 13, 2012, St. Peter Police and Nicollet County Deputies came to my
place to arrest me and I learned of the issuance of another false and void 5 arrest warrant by First
Judicial District judge M. Michael Baxter;
b. Usually arriving in 3 or 4 vehicles, the police and deputies attempted to unlawfully arrest
me at 4:15pm on June 14, at 9:43pm on June 15 when they circled my place several times shining
their spotlights in the windows, and at 12:08pm on June 19, 2012;

4
The rules provide that upon appeal the conditions for defendant’s release and the factors determining those
conditions are governed by the rules applicable to pretrial release. See Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 29; Mims v. State
(1880) 26 Minn. 494, 5 N.W. 369
5
Pursuant to several state and federal laws, the arrest warrant is automatically null and void and unenforceable like
the previous orders; see Counts One to Five in my First Civil Complaint.

7
 c. The visits by law enforcement brought back the constant fear I felt for 3 years in Le Sueur
of the next knock on my door by our corrupt and out-of-control government;
d. Naturally alarmed, especially by the late-night raids, my neighbors were very upset;
e. One of my neighbors called one of my sisters, who used to own the house I am living in, to
inquire if I was a child molester or something along those lines;
f. A St. Peter police officer called the realtor for information on me;
g. The realtor contacted my relatives - the current owners of the house;
h. Along the way, I was falsely accused of being a “felon” and “sue crazy”;
i. I called St. Peter Police Chief Mathew Peters on June 15th to report Baxter’s crime and the
ongoing case fixing in case 09-786, to open an investigation and secure crime victim services for
my family, and to explain that I had recently filed my 500-page PETITION BOOK in case 12-366
at the Government Center in St. Peter, but Peters hung up on me;
j. I also requested a declaration in case 12-366 that the arrest warrant is void, but judge
Krehbiel failed to adjudicate this ex parte pleading too;
k. At first, my relatives and I were both told that the police may break my door down if I
would not turn myself in, but a few days later a relative was told that they would not do that;
l. I notified the local authorities that I would lawfully resist arrest because I know and can
prove that the arrest warrant is false 6, and that I am not a violent man and pose no risk of harm to
any law enforcement personnel, but that if they knowingly and willfully carry out the false arrest
despite the facts they will be held liable to my family for damages.
m. At great expense of time and money, I had written several letters, and copied my pleadings
and hundreds of pages of documentary evidence of the ongoing child abuses and crimes to the
Nicollet County Commissioners and Nicollet County Social Service Director Joan Tesdahl; and
when the recent false arrest warrant crime was committed in Nicollet County, I included St. Peter
Administrator Todd Prafke in my communications and ex parte pleadings so he could act
appropriately, but all of them criminally neglected their duties too.
n. On July 2 2012, I was tazered and falsely arrested by St. Peter Police; was handcuffed and
put in a Nicollet County Sheriff vehicle, which was among the approximately 5 police vehicles and
4 sheriff vehicles with 15 officers that responded; was told that I would be booked into the Nicollet
County jail; and was brought to the Le Sueur County jail by sheriff deputy Mike O’Gormley, who
promised me that he would read my PETITION BOOK and pleadings in case 12-366 and
investigate my claims that my children and I are victims of several crimes;
o. At the hearing a few hours later: Baxter denied me counsel; ignored my arguments that the
sentence and probation conditions are suspended and refused to allow me to provide my case law
when able; forced me to sign the erroneous and unchanged Probation Agreement, which was the
subject matter of the arrest warrant, in exchange for my release; and set an “admit or deny” hearing
in August despite knowing that the charge was totally bogus. My probation agent, Julia Kraemer,
who I found out while in jail is violating many on known false charges and even manufacturing
evidence, and Zehnder Fischer, obviously in conspiracy, both committed further fraud upon the
court by claiming that my contact with my adult children was in violation of Baxter’s ‘No Contact’
order, which Zehnder Fischer had obtained by fraud v during the sentencing hearing on February 7th.
40. On June 23, 2012, my Second Civil Complaint and Summons were served by mail
upon the state of Minnesota, but to date, has still not been filed.
41. On July 3, the day after my arrest, Zehnder Fischer wrote to me to remind me for the
third time that I should have no contact with my children, informed me that Nicollet County
Social Service Director Joan Tesdahl shared my confidential communications regarding the child

6
Where an attempted arrest is unlawful, a person may resist such arrest. State v. Cantieny (1885) 34 Minn. 1, 24
N.W. 458; State v. Miller (1958) 253 Minn. 112, 91 N.W.2d 138

8
protection and child abuse matters with her, and told me to “cease and desist submitting
documentation” in Nicollet County.
42. I have no doubt now that St. Peter and Nicollet County law enforcement, social
services, and officers of the Fifth Judicial District courts, are doing the same thing as their
colleagues in the First Judicial District.
43. There is widespread corruption in Minnesota’s First Judicial District; there is
complicity in the case fixing across the board in Le Sueur County; the First Judicial District
courts and offices are being run like a mafia; I do not think it is as bad in the Fifth, but the mere
fact that serial case fixer Zehnder Fischer is the Nicollet County Attorney tells me that there is
corruption in this district too.
44. Over the years, I have compiled a ‘mountain’ of evidence to prove the case fixing.
45. I also have a growing list of other victims that can attest to the case fixing.
46. All of the facts, evidence, and controlling law in my cases are on my side.
47. All of the facts, evidence, and controlling law in other victims’ cases are on their side.
48. The following Minnesota public officials are fixing court cases:
a. First Judicial District Court Judge M. Michael Baxter;
b. First Judicial District Court Judge Richard C. Perkins;
c. First Judicial District Court Judge Martha Simonett;
d. First Judicial District Court Chief Judge Edward I. Lynch;
e. Minnesota Court of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson;
f. Minnesota Court of Appeals former Chief Judge Edward Toussaint;
g. Nicollet County Attorney Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer;
h. Former Nicollet County Attorney Michael K. Riley;
i. Le Sueur County Attorney Brent Christian;
j. Le Sueur County Attorney Kevin Moran;
k. First Judicial District Public Defender Richard C. Lea;
l. First Judicial District Managing Attorney for Public Defenders Thomas O’Connor;
m. First Judicial District Chief Public Defender Steve Holmgren;
n. Minnesota State Public Defender John Stuart;
o. First Judicial District Court Administrator Joanne M. Kopet;
p. Le Sueur County Sheriff Thomas P. Doherty;
q. Le Sueur County Sheriff Investigator Bruce Collins;
r. Le Sueur Child Support Supervisor Tammy Morgan;
s. Minnesota Department of Corrections Probation/Parole Agent Julia Kraemer;
t. United States District Court Chief Judge Michael J. Davis;
u. United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel;
v. United States Attorney B. Todd Jones;
w. United States District Court Clerk Richard D. Sletten;
x. United States District Court Clerk’s Office Manager Lou Jean Gleason;
49. The following Minnesota public officials are obstructing justice for the case fixers:
a. Le Sueur County Sheriff Thomas P. Doherty;
b. Nicollet County Sheriff Dave Lange;
c. Le Sueur County Sheriff Investigator Bruce Collins;
d. Nicollet County Sheriff Investigator Kip Olson;
e. Le Sueur County Jail Administrator Larry Sykes;

9
 f. Le Sueur County Jail Guard Jason Squires;
g. Le Sueur Police Chief Bruce Kelly;
h. St. Peter Police Chief Mathew Peters;
i. Le Sueur Child Support Caseworker Cari J. Krenik;
j. First Judicial District Court Reporter Paul H. Lyndgaard;
k. Minnesota Court of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson;
l. Minnesota Court of Appeals Judges Peterson, Wright, Larkin (or implicated by Johnson);
m. Minnesota Supreme Court Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules;
n. Minnesota Supreme Court Assistant Commissioner Joanne H. Turner;
o. Minnesota Supreme Court former Commissioner Richard S. Slowes;
p. The Board of Le Sueur County Commissioners;
q. Minnesota Department of Human Services Assistant Commissioner Charles E. Johnson;
r. Minnesota Attorney General Consumer Services Director Charles Ferguson;
s. Minnesota Deputy Attorney General Thomas C. Vasaly
t. One or more other public officials at the Minnesota Attorney General’s office;
u. One or more public officials at the Minnesota Governor’s office;
v. United States Assistant Attorney William Volk;
w. United States Marshal for Minnesota Sharon Lubinski;
x. United States Marshal Deputy Paul Keyes;
y. United States Marshal Deputy Thomas Folk;
50. The following Minnesota public officials criminally neglected their duties7:
a. All case fixers and obstructers of justice named above;
b. Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
c. Fifth Judicial District Court Judge Allison L. Krehbiel;
d. Le Sueur County Social Service Director Susan Rynda;
e. Nicollet County Social Service Director Joan Tesdahl;
f. The Board of Nicollet County Commissioners;
g. St. Peter City Administrator Todd Prafke;
h. Le Sueur Child Support Caseworker Cari J. Krenik;
i. Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson;
j. Minnesota Attorney General Citizen Research Specialist Angela Skarda;
k. Minnesota Department of Human Services Commissioner Cal Ludeman;
l. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Executive Director Wayland Campbell;
m. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Executive Assistant Jamie Parker;
n. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Deputy Director Karen Schirle;
o. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Direct Services Manager Pat Kraut;
p. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Supervisor Laurie Van Ellsberg;
q. Minnesota Division of Child Support Enforcement Supervisor Carol Thomas;
r. The Minnesota Reparations Board (of September 2009);
s. State Senator Kevin Dahle;
t. State Representative Laura Brod;
u. State Senator Al D. DeKruif;
v. State Representative Glenn Gruenhagen;
w. United States Senator Amy Klobuchar;
x. United States Senator Al Franken;
y. United States Representative John Kline;
z. United States Postal Inspector for Minnesota Mike Schnaubschlager;

7
Under Minn. Stat. § 609.43, willful neglect of official duty by a public officer is a criminal offense. Davis v. Le
Sueur County (1887) 37 Minn. 491, 35 N.W. 364; State v. Palmerton (1941) 210 Minn. 476, 299 N.W. 669

10
 aa. One or more public officials in former Minnesota Governor Pawlenty’s office;
bb. One or more public officials in Minnesota Governor Dayton’s office;
cc. Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent Mike Dudley in Mankato;
51. The Minnesota case fixers, justice obstructers, and duty neglecters all know that I
have evidence to prove:
a. That my child support obligations are paid-in-full;
b. That the Colorado child support order and arrears balance were obtained by fraud;
c. That registration of the order and arrears balance in Minnesota was obtained by fraud;
d. That the child support order, arrears balance and registration order are void;
e. That I abided by the law to support my children, and that all government officials involved
in the child support matters over the past 7 years have broken one or more laws in their illegal
pursuit to force me to pay my child support obligations again;
f. That the charge of ‘non-support’ of my children is false;
g. That I am innocent of the charges, but have been falsely arrested and imprisoned 7 times;
h. That my five children and I have been separated for over 5 years;
i. That my five children and I are crime victims;
j. That they are the criminals; and
k. Many other things alleged and proven in my PETITION BOOK and other pleadings.
52. As direct and proximate results of the crime spree over the past 7 years, my five
children and I have suffered enormous damagesvi and, according to precedencevii, are entitled to
hundreds-of-millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.
53. Because of the level of egregiousness and brutality of the crime spree against my
family, I will seek record-setting awards in our actions in both statesviii.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 14th Day of July 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
54. Under the circumstances detailed in the foregoing Affidavit, all of my previous
requests and assertions of rights in behalf of my family are now demands:
DEMAND #1: Adjudication of my First Civil Complaint, Relief from Judgment, and a Pardon:
My First Civil Complaint:

11
 55.Fifth Judicial District judge Allison L. Krehbiel was bound by law8 to adjudicate case
52-CV-12-366, which included pronouncing default judgment in my favor9.
56. Because the state failed to answer, no judicial discretion is warranted; in other words,
I won - it’s over - I am entitled to all the relief requested.
57. Krehbiel is purposely discriminating against me to help her corrupt colleagues and is
violating my family’s due process, equal protection and other rights, on several different levels.
58. Krehbiel now knows and has seen evidence proving that Nicollet County Attorney
Michelle Zehnder Fischer is a serial case fixer, sheriff Dave Lange is obstructing justice, and
several Nicollet County residents are involved in the crime or child abuse sprees or both.
59. On information and belief, Krehbiel is fixing court cases too.
60. Because justice delayed is justice denied, I am sending my First Civil Complaint
and all other pleadings in the case along with this criminal complaint to the Minnesota Supreme
Court for adjudication.
Relief from Judgment:
61. The Rule 60 relief and other relief requested in my PETITION BOOK are mandatory10.

8
For one: The Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, Code of Judicial Conduct, require
(emphasis added):
Rule 1.1 Compliance with the Law: A judge shall comply with the law, including the Code of Judicial
Conduct.
Rule 2.2 Impartiality and Fairness: A judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform all duties of
judicial office fairly and impartially.
Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct: (C) A judge shall not convey or permit others to convey
the impression that any person or organization [including the state] is in a position to influence the judge.
Rule 2.6 Ensuring the Right to Be Heard: (A) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in
a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, the right to be heard according to law.
Rule 2.7 Responsibility to Decide: A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge, except when
disqualification is required by Rule 2.11 or other law.
Rule 2.11 Disqualification: (A) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which the
judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned …
Rule 2.15 Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct: (A) A judge having knowledge [from my
PETITION BOOK] that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a substantial question
regarding the judge's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other respects shall inform the appropriate
authority. (B) A judge having knowledge [from my PETITION BOOK] that a lawyer has committed a violation of
the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness,
or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority. (C) A judge who receives credible
information [my PETITION BOOK] indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation
of this Code shall take appropriate action. (D) A judge who receives credible information [my PETITION BOOK]
indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct
shall take appropriate action.

9
Minn. R. Civ. P. 55.01 (emphasis added):
When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend within the
time allowed therefor by these rules or by statute, … judgment by default shall be entered against that party …

10
Where Rule 60(b)(4) is properly invoked on the basis that the underlying judgment is void, "'relief is not a
discretionary matter; it is mandatory.'" Orner v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307, 1310 (10th Cir. 1994) (quoting V.T.A., Inc.
v. Airco, Inc., 597 F.2d 220, 224 n.8 (10th Cir. 1979))

12
 62. Had the Minnesota Supreme Court done its duties then, my family’s nightmare would
have ended in June 2011.
63. Chief Justice Gildea: Your dismissal of my first petition on a technicality in Appeal
A11-700 is not only void but is also, along with the Commissioners’ scandalous behavior over
the next few months in sending my other three petitions back to me, telling. Your high courts
have done all sorts of things to assist the case fixers in covering up their crimes. Are your judges
fixing appeals too? Are you aware of my pleadings to your court while in jail earlier this year:
a. EX PARTE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, dated December 21 2011;
b. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, dated December 21 2011;
c. EX PARTE EMERGENCY PETITION FOR REVERSAL OF BAIL ORDER, dated
December 27 2011;
d. EX PARTE PETITION FOR PLACEMENT IN WITNESS PROTECTION, dated January
3 2012;
e. MOTION TO DISMISS, dated January 13 2012 (originally sent to the district court);
f. PETITION FOR SPECIAL JURISDICTION AND VENUE, dated January 16 2012;
g. EX PARTE PETITION FOR INITIAL ARREST WARRANTS, dated January 24 2012;
h. EMERGENCY PETITION TO REVERSE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION, dated
January 24 2012;
i. EMERGENCY EX PARTE PETITION FOR SEVERAL ORDERS, dated January 30
2012;
j. PETITION FOR ADJUDICATION OF ALL CLAIMS, dated February 8 2012;
k. EX PARTE PETITION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE AND OTHER ORDERS, dated
February 17 2012;
l. NOTICE OF APPEAL - STATEMENT OF THE CASE, dated February 20 2012;
m. Originally sent to the district court, but when returned to me at the jail were sent to your
court pending establishment of special jurisdiction and venue, which never took place:
COUNTERCLAIM, dated December 20 2011; EX PARTE PLEADINGS, dated December 22
2011; COMBINED CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against Baxter, Sykes, Doherty,
Perkins, Christian, Zehnder Fischer, Morgan, Lynch, Kopet, Lyndgaard, Collins, Lea, O’Connor,
Holmgren, Stuart, and Kelly, dated December 22 2011 to January 14 2012; MOTION TO
DISMISS, dated January 13 2012; VERIFIED COMPLAINTS against the state of Minnesota and
Baxter, Sykes, Doherty, Perkins, Christian, Zehnder Fischer, Morgan, Lynch, Kopet, Lyndgaard,
Collins, Lea, O’Connor, Holmgren, Stuart, and Kelly, dated February 1 2012; MOTION FOR
RECUSALS, DISQUALIFICATIONS, AND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS, dated January 19 2012;
MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCING ORDER, dated February 10 2012; MOTION FOR COPY
OF CONFIDENTIAL REPORT, dated February 10 2012; MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT IN COUNTERCLAIM, dated February 20 2012 (all of these documents were
returned to me at the jail by Commissioner DeMeules).
Are you aware of the concerted effort by First Judicial District chief judge Lynch and his case
fixing minions in Le Sueur County to totally block my access to the district court, to send my
pleadings back to me at the jail, to again deny me counsel, to again deny me in forma pauperis
status, and to unlawfully detain me because of the fact that I have enough evidence to put them
all in jail? Are you aware of the concerted effort by Commissioner DeMeules and Court of
Appeals chief judge Johnson to totally block my access to the appellate courts, to again dismiss
all my pleadings on technicalities, to again undermine my efforts to obtain appellate review of
the unlawful detention and other actions, and to assist the case fixers in unlawfully detaining me
because of the fact that I have enough evidence to put DeMeules and Johnson in jail too? Are
you aware of any of my letters to you explaining the ongoing scandal in your high courts? Are

13
you aware that I sent another copy of my PETITION BOOK to you while in jail? Are you aware
that there are 450 pages of documentary evidence attached to my PETITION BOOK proving most
of the 528 case fixing crimes alleged therein? Are you aware that the case fixing criminals in
both states have continued their crime sprees against my family due to your failure to act?
If you are aware of any of these things, you should resign at the very least.
If not, or if you were forced to go along with the New World Order’s case fixing tactics or other
takeover schemes, see endnote i, under threat of losing your job, or worse, I would like to give
you a second chance if your colleagues in the other two branches of our government agree, as I
am a forgiving person and know what it is like to be bullied by these criminals. If this is the case,
first realize that my children and I are crime victims (I should be able to present our claims to
you or any judge on a leaf or a piece of bark and expect that the state will take it from there).
Because of the ongoing case fixing, I demand special original jurisdiction for my family’s cases
at the Minnesota Supreme Courtix.
Once jurisdiction is established for my family’s cases, please adjudge case 12-366 for judge
Krehbiel; enclosed with your copy of this criminal complaint are:
a. My First Civil Complaint with citations of controlling law - see footnotes and endnotes;
b. 119 pages of documentary evidence in Exhibits MN-501 to MN-511 to substantiate all claims;
c. Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary Orders and my PETITION BOOK;
d. Ex Parte Affidavit of Financial Status and Motion for Reimbursement Order;
e. Motion for Default Judgment (against the State of Minnesota);
f. Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protection and Other Orders; and
g. My Second Civil Complaint and Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary Orders - see DEMAND #2.
Then, if all controversies are not resolved by the adjudication of case 12-366, please address the
Rule 60 relief and other relief requested in the 4th petition of my PETITION BOOK.
On your court’s own initiative, please bring about the appropriate charges, disbarments, writs of
prohibition, writs of mandamus, and any other action necessary in the interest of justice.
As soon as you complete the judicial branch’s role in fulfilling my demands in this document,
then ‘clean-house’ and ensure all Minnesota citizens that your branch does not tolerate case
fixing, will protect my family and other victims from further harm, and will take appropriate
action against all judges, attorneys, and other officers of the courts who are fixing cases, and all
public officials who are obstructing justice and/or neglecting their duties to aid the case fixers.
For the millions of American children who have been forced to grow up without one or both of
their parents due to the racketeering in family law and the criminal justice system, please set
meaningful precedence in my family’s cases and work with the other two branches to bring
about much needed reform - see suggestions in DEMAND #7.
64. Governor Dayton: I wrote to you on February 18, February 24, and March 3, 2011,
regarding the ongoing malicious prosecution and resulting false conviction for nonsupport of my
kids; and I sent you two copies of my PETITION BOOK because of the trouble I was having with
the Supreme Court Commissioners; and I wrote to you on July 7, August 8, August 12, and
August 26, 2011 with very reasonable proposals to settle all civil and criminal claims. Many of
the services now demanded were requested in my letter to you on August 8, 2011x. One or more
officials in your office are obstructing justice for the case fixers. Please clean up your office and
take total control of my family’s crisis. Also, had anyone with the attorney general’s office, the

14
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Governor Pawlenty’s office, or the other state offices
I contacted for help, done their duties, my family’s nightmare would have ended in 2008.
65. Legislators: The senators and representatives named in my affidavit know all about
my family’s crisis, but did not do anything and some flat-out refused to initiate impeachment
proceedings or even report the crime spree to you. Are legislators involved in the case fixing
too? Please put these confused senators and representatives back on the right path and help my
family and other victims of oppression and government abuse in every way that you can.
Official Pardon:
66. In addition to relief from all judgment in Minnesota, I would also like an official
pardon under the circumstances so that there will never be a question in the future about the fact
that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and that I was falsely convicted of nonsupport
of my children; please consider this demand as my application for such to the Board of Pardons.
67. According to Article V, Section 7 of the Constitution of the state of Minnesota:
“The governor in conjunction with the board of pardons has power to grant reprieves and pardons …”
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, I demand immediate adjudication (by July 31,
2012) of the causes of action in my First Civil Complaint, including default judgment in my
favor and all the relief requested including reimbursement of my expenses in the amount of
$78,536.00 (see motion with second complaint); immediate relief from all judgment in cases 40-
FA-07-1253 and 40-CR-09-786 as requested in my PETITION BOOK; and an official pardon for
the false conviction of nonsupport of my children in case 09-786; together with such other and
further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #2: Crime Victim Services and Heightened Witness Protection-like Services:
68. I have requested crime victim services for my family approximately 100 times.
69. My children and I, and all other victims, are entitled to:
a. Arrest or summons of the suspects pursuant to Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 3;
b. Further detection and investigation, if needed;
c. Protection from further harm;
d. Crime victim reparations during the pendency of the criminal cases;
e. Prosecution of the suspects to the fullest extent of the law;
f. Full and timely restitution;
g. Appropriate fines and imprisonmentxi; and
h. All other rights of crime victims pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 611A.01 to 611A.06.
70. Despite the thousands of pages of documentary evidence attached to my previous
criminal complaints and my PETITION BOOK proving probable cause of most of the over 500
crimes alleged, not one charge has ever been made.
71. In May 2011, just after submitting my PETITION BOOK in both states:
a. Two black suburban-like SUVs came to my place in Le Sueur and at least two plain-
clothed federal agents and a uniformed Minnesota state patrolman, obviously knowing that my
front door was broken, came to my backdoor;
b. Unbeknownst to them, I witnessed the event from the place next-door;
c. One of the federal agents pounded on my backdoor several times;
d. The other federal agent had his hand on his gun ready to draw it;

15
 e. The Minnesota patrolman just stood there, looking dumbfounded;
f. On information and belief, the federal agents were there to kill me because of my evidence
and the patrolman was just as alarmed as I was to witness it;
g. Ever since then, in addition to my “fear of the next knock on my door by our corrupt and
out-of-control federal government,” which is being run like a mafia, I now fear for my life.
72. The destruction of my family and the never-ending attacks on me by the New World
Order’s lackeys in our government are true domestic terror.
73. The current scandals to keep the truth off the record in the Fifth Judicial District and
to prevent contact with my children show that there is no limit to the case fixers’ tactics to cover
up their crimes; and, on information and belief, the Colorado case fixers are now paying off the
Minnesota case fixers to prevent resolution and keep me and my evidence out of Colorado.
74. There is absolutely no doubt that the case fixers are engaging in the greatest scandal
that has ever existed in the history of our nation.
75. They know they are caught.
76. They are desperate to silence me, even if they have to kidnap me or murder me.
77. Somehow, they convinced the St. Peter Police and Nicollet County Sheriff to dispatch
between 3 and 9 vehicles and up to 15 officers at a time to my place to arrest me, a
‘noncompliant Deadbeat Dad,’ which speaks for itself about what they will do to silence a
whistleblower.
78. If the situation gets any worse, I will be demanding 24/7 bodyguards.
My Second Civil Complaint:
79. Because my family’s safety is paramount in my mind, the subject matter of my
Second Civil Complaint, dated June 21 2012, was to immediately redress my family’s housing
and income crises and to secure crime victim services in Nicollet County and heightened witness
protection-like services by the state during the pendency of all the civil and criminal cases, but
now Fifth Judicial District officials are obstructing justice and refusing to even file it.
80. Regardless of filing, the state’s answer is due no later than July 16, 2012.
81. The attorney general’s office has criminally neglected its duties to my family for
several years; has never answered my complaints or letters; has never responded to my requests
for admission and production or any of my other discovery requests; completely ignored my
subpoenas in case 09-786; completely ignored my challenges to jurisdiction and requests for
certification of the codification of Minn. Stat. § 609.375, which on its face is unconstitutional
because it punishes child support debtors with prison time in violation of Article I, Section 12 of
the Constitution of the State of Minnesota; has never intervened in the ongoing scandals in child
support enforcement; has never responded to my repeated requests for removal and replacement
of the corrupt county attorneys in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties or my repeated requests for
grand jury investigations and the appointment of special prosecutors; has repeatedly failed to
step in as Minnesota’s highest law enforcement authority to take control of the crime sprees by
law enforcement; and completely ignored my reasonable settlement proposals in the 4th petition
of my PETITION BOOK, which would have resolved all matters, both civil and criminal, at a
minimal cost to the state.

16
 82. Furthermore, the state has never refuted a single fact, has never rebutted any of my
evidence, has never resolved a single issue, has never adjudicated a single claim, and has never
provided a single service to my family.
83. And therefore, I am not expecting an answer when due.
84. And in that event, the state will lose the opportunity to settle my claims in the amount
of $250,000.00 to resolve my “housing crisis” and in the amount of $7,000.00 per month to
resolve my “income crisis.”
85. Also, I had previously requested full crime victim services in Nicollet County in case
12-366, but my 7th false arrest and other recent events lead me to believe that judicial and law
enforcement officials in the Fifth Judicial District are racketeering in family law and the criminal
justice system just like in the First District.
86. Therefore, under the circumstances, in addition to resolving my housing and income
crises as requested in my second complaint and providing full crime victim services, the state
will also need to ensure heightened witness protection-like services for my family, including
bodyguards if necessary, and will need to summon one or more grand juries and appoint one or
more special prosecutors in Nicollet County; see DEMAND #3.
87. Since I submitted my second complaint, the St. Peter home has been sold.
88. I will need to move by July 31, 2012.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand immediate
adjudication (by July 31, 2012) of my Second Civil Complaint, including default judgment in
my favor; an immediate court award in the amount of $750,000.00 so that I can obtain suitable
housing for my family in Nicollet County; an immediate order to the state of Minnesota to
compensate me each month in the amount of $21,000.00 beginning June 1 2012; an order to the
state of Minnesota to arrange and pay for all crime victim services for my family and witness
protection-like services, as needed, including 24/7 bodyguards; an order to the state of Minnesota
to reimburse the citizens of Nicollet County and the Fifth Judicial District for any services
provided to my family; and appropriate punitive damages and such other and further sua sponte
relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #3: Grand Juries, Special Prosecutors, Indictments, and Initial Arrest Warrants:
89. I have been requesting grand jury investigations and special prosecutors since I first
reported the case fixing to Le Sueur Police Chief Bruce Kelly in June 2008.
90. I have requested the same from the attorney general’s office multiple times.
91. Case fixing negatively affects all of society.
92. Public interest requires the summoning of one or more grand juries pursuant to Minn.
R. Crim. P. Rule 18.01, subd. 1:
“The grand jury must be summoned and convened whenever required by the public interest.” (emphasis added)
93. My children and I and all other victims are entitled to grand jury investigations,
indictments of the suspects, and, because the Le Sueur and Nicollet County Attorneys are
involved in the case fixing, the appointment of special prosecutors.

17
 94. Until all Minnesota orders in cases 07-1253 and 09-786 are vacated and because
Lynch and Baxter have banned me from the First Judicial District Courts, venue in my cases and
other victims’ cases should be changed to the supreme court until the corrupt officers of the
courts of the First and Fifth Judicial District are arrested.
95. Until the case fixers are removed from office, I believe it would be in the best
interests of the victims and the public to convene the grand juries in Nicollet County to start.
96. In my family’s cases, very little investigation is needed and the grand juries will be
able to simply verify probable cause of the crimes from the evidence attached to my PETITION
BOOK and criminal complaints.
97. The worst of the offenders who should be arrested right away are:
a. Nicollet County Attorney Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer;
b. First Judicial District Court Judge M. Michael Baxter;
c. First Judicial District Court Judge Richard C. Perkins;
d. First Judicial District Court Chief Judge Edward I. Lynch;
e. Le Sueur County Attorney Brent Christian;
f. Le Sueur County Attorney Kevin Moran;
g. First Judicial District Public Defender Richard C. Lea;
h. Minnesota Department of Corrections Probation/Parole Agent Julia Kraemer;
i. Le Sueur County Sheriff Thomas P. Doherty; and
j. Nicollet County Sheriff Dave Lange;
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family and other victims, I
demand the immediate summoning of one or more grand juries in Nicollet County for
investigation and appropriate charges against the case fixers, justice obstructers and duty
neglecters in the First and Fifth Judicial Districts; the immediate appointment of one or more
special prosecutors; and appropriate charges and initial arrest warrants against the worst of the
offenders starting with the ten listed above; together with such other and further sua sponte relief
deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #4: Expedited Civil and Criminal Relief for All Victims
98. I have a growing list of other victims who can attest to the case fixing:
a. Matt Crosby has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter,
Moran, Lea, and Doherty;
b. Jason (young guy; $10,000 bail, then none) has relevant evidence and testimony to attest
the case fixing by Baxter and other officers of the court;
c. Zachary Becker has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter,
Moran, and Lea;
d. Terry Johnstone has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter,
Moran, Lea, and Doherty;
e. Travis Chadmore has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Lea;
f. George McIntosh has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing tactics by
Kraemer and other DOC parole agents and “ISR” agents (“Intense Supervised Release”);
g. Joe Zeiher has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter, Moran,
and officials in Waseca County;
h. Eric Wermerskirchen has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by
Christian and child support enforcement (Krenik);

18
 i. Zack Lundstrom has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter,
Lea, and Kraemer;
j. Bill Buchan has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter and
Kraemer;
k. Anthony Ferretti has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter
and Christian;
l. James Malheim has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Baxter
and Moran;
m. Todd Braun has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Zehnder
Fischer and St. Peter law enforcement;
n. Brian Mechler has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Zehnder
Fischer, Moran, and possibly Christian;
o. Lea Sage has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Perkins, Baxter,
and Carver County social service caseworkers and law enforcement;
p. Caroline Rice has relevant evidence and testimony to attest the case fixing by Perkins,
Baxter, and Carver County social service caseworkers and law enforcement.
99. My witnesses and I will be able to quickly prove to the grand juries, and to you, that
the scandal in the First Judicial District is enormous.
100. Baxter and Lynch are orchestrating the case fixing in Le Sueur County.
101. Perkins and Lynch are orchestrating the case fixing in Carver County.
102. On information and belief, Lynch, Holmgren, Stuart, and one or more officials at the
attorney general’s office, human service offices, department of corrections offices, police and
sheriff offices, and other local and state offices, have extorted millions from the poor, young, old,
ignorant, pro se litigants and criminal defendants in the First Judicial District; and, most if not all
judges, prosecutors, public defenders, court administrators, probation/parole agents, sheriffs,
police chiefs, and many others have participated and have taken a cut of the extortions.
103. I have only been in St. Peter since April, but know that Zehnder Fischer is a serial
case fixer, and based on the treatment so far by Krehbiel, Tesdahl, the St. Peter Police and
Nicollet County Sheriff’s office, the county commissioners, and the city administrator, I believe
that the Fifth Judicial District is racketeering too.
104. In behalf of my family, I would like to present my evidence to the grand jury right
away, and in behalf of the Crosby family, I request an immediate supreme court review of the
injustices against Matt Crosby, who was framed like me and was recently sent to prison by
Baxter; Matt’s cases are 40-CR-11-228 and 40-CR-12-370 Please review the cases as if appealed
and appoint an appellate public defender for Matt. I would be happy to work with the appellate
public defender, write a Statement of the Case or provide a brief for Matt.
105. If needed, I will be acting as private attorney generalxii for Matt and other victims in
Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family and all other victims, I
demand whatever special jurisdiction, venue, crime victim services, appellate review and other
services necessary to expedite civil and criminal relief for all victims; together with such other
and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #5: Removals from Office, Terminations of Employment, Disbarments,
Impeachments, and Banishments from Our Government:

19
 106. All case fixers, justice obstructers and duty neglecters named herein should be fired,
removed from officexiii, and banned from ever holding another government position.
107. All case fixers, justice obstructers and duty neglecters named herein should be
charged for their crimes and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law like any other criminal.
108. All judges, attorneys, prosecutors, public defenders, and others licensed to practice
law, and who have ever fixed even one case, should be disbarredxiv.
109. All judges, who have fixed even one case, should be impeachedxv.
110. In behalf of my family and all other victims in the First and Fifth Judicial Districts, I
hereby petition for the removals from office, terminations of employment, disbarments,
impeachments, and banishments from our government, of all case fixers, justice obstructers and
duty neglecters named herein.
111. If Attorney General Lori Swanson knows about my family’s crisis, the case fixing, or
the willful neglect of duty or the obstructions of justice by her employees, she should be
removed from office11 and charged too12.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family and all other victims, I
demand the appropriate removals from office, terminations of employment, disbarments,
impeachments, and banishments from our government of all case fixers, justice obstructers and
duty neglecters in Minnesota; together with such other and further sua sponte relief deemed
reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #6: Expunction of Criminal Records
112. Complete expunction of my criminal record should be initiated immediately pursuant
to Minn. Stat. § 609A.01 to 609A.03, as I am in imminent danger of further harm due to the
ongoing attacks by our totally corrupt and out-of-control federal government and the Minnesota
public officials that have bought into their takeover of our state and local communities.
113. Other victims’ criminal records should also be expunged.
114. All victims’ convictions should be overturned - see news article in endnote xi.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family and all other victims, I
demand the complete expunction of my criminal record and other victims’ criminal records, and
the overturning of all the case fixers’ convictions by the supreme court; together with such other
and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #7: Reform

11
If the duty imposed on an officer is not properly performed because of inefficiency in selecting subordinates or
in checking their work, good case exists for the removal of the officer, State ex rel. Rockwell v. State Bd. Of Educ.
(1942) 213 Minn. 184, 6 N.W.2d 251
It is the rule that where power is given by statute to public officers to conserve either the public or private
interest, the exercise of power is mandatory, Bowen v. City of Minneapolis (1891) 47 Minn. 115, 49 N.W. 683; State
ex rel. Laurisch v. Pohl (1943) 214 Minn. 221, 8 N.W.2d 227
12
A willful neglect of official duty by a public officer is a criminal offense, Minn. Stat. § 609.43
Whether a public officer is liable for the acts of a subordinate depends upon the nature of the office and of the
act or omission. A public officer is not responsible for the torts of a subordinate, unless he or she cooperates, directs,
or encourages the wrongful act. But ratification may be equivalent to command and cooperation may be inferred
from acquiescence where there is no determent, Nelson v. Babcock (1933) 188 Minn. 584, 248 N.W. 49

20
 115. All victims of case fixing and the racketeering in family law and the criminal justice
system deserve a concerted effort by all three branches of our Minnesota government to reform
certain laws and how they are being applied, or misapplied, by the case fixers.
116. The following are suggestions:
CASE FIXING:
117. Before I had a chance to respond during our brief telephone conversation, St. Peter
Police Chief Mathew Peters yelled, “We don’t have a statute for case fixing,” and then hung up.
118. Case fixing is not done out of ignorance; it is a willful, conspired, calculated,
treasonous crime.
119. Case fixing is much more that malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance.
120. It involves fraud upon the court, mail fraud, perjury, subornation of perjury, extortion,
oppression, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of due process and other rights, acting outside
authority, issuing false orders and fictitious obligations, imposing excessive bail, obstruction of
justice, influencing the proper administration of law, executing false arrest warrants and serving
other unlawful orders, processing fictitious obligations, manufacturing evidence, framing
defendants, falsifying documents, altering records or accounts, tampering with witnesses,
denying access to the court system, willful negligence of official duties, etc.
121. A new Minnesota law should call the crime what it is: “case fixing.”
122. And stiff punishments should be imposed for case fixing to deter others from
engaging in it, which will, I believe by itself, end the case fixing in the United States.
123. During their incremental overthrow of the United States over the past few decades,
see endnote i, the traitors have militarized our police and sheriff departments, have mandated
unconstitutional processes in our courts and social services and corrections, and have, covertly,
spread the racketeering all across our nation to destroy the family and state and individual
sovereignty, and to takeover the states and our local communities.
124. Minnesota has been taken over, in my opinion.
125. Many of our courts, law enforcement and human service agencies, and other local and
state offices are being operated like a mafia. And their tactics are brutal; their tactics are true
domestic terror. We the People, including the good judges, cops, and other government
employees, are afraid of these criminals. The public trust is gone.
126. As the traitors are brought to justice, special legislation, executive orders, and sua
sponte judicial action can restore the public trust by keeping the juries, witnesses, judges, and
other officers of the court anonymous like in the Chicago trial of one of its mafia bosses in the
1920s - a few suggestions:
a. Anonymous grand jury investigations: Although the investigations are already confidential,
under the circumstances the members of the grand juries should be further protected by allowing
them to issue indictments anonymously, for example “By the Grand Jury” instead of disclosing the
foremen or the membership.
b. Anonymous administration and adjudication: The clerks, judges, prosecutors, and other
officers of the court can be protected from retaliation by allowing them to process, present evidence

21
 and arguments, and adjudicate cases anonymously; for one example, in this electronic age, all good
judges in the Fifth Judicial District could collaborate online and issue their decisions en banc.
c. Anonymous testimony and jury trials: Witnesses and juries can be protected by allowing
anonymous affidavits and testimony, and perhaps shielding them at trial behind one-way glass.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds and standing and cause for concern, in behalf of
all victims, I ask the leaders of the three branches of our Minnesota government to initiate
special legislation, executive orders, and sua sponte judicial action for the purposes of protecting
victims and good government employees from retaliation, instituting appropriate punishments
for case fixing, and restoring the public trust, as the traitors are brought to justice.
MINNESOTA STATUTE § 609.375
127.Minn. Stat. § 609.375 appears to be unconstitutional in that it can impose as a
punishment “debtor’s prison,” which was done away with in the early 1800s.
128. In case 09-786, I repeatedly requested certification of the codification of this law
from the attorney general’s office, but never received the required response.
129. I would like to challenge this law as unconstitutional on the grounds stated in my
challenges to jurisdiction in case 09-786; see Court of Appeals case A12-0794.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds and standing and cause for concern, in behalf of
all child support ‘debtors,’ I ask the Minnesota Supreme Court to provide me your certification
of Minn. Stat. § 609.375 and to open an appeal at your court for review of this law.
VOID AND VOIDABLE ORDERS:
130. Noncustodial parents are being aced out of their children’s lives with unconstitutional
child support and visitation orders. No father or mother should ever have to go through what I
have just to deal with automatically void orders.
131. Criminal defendants are being subjected to excessive bail and radically unfair plea
deals. All accused, whether young, old, poor, pro se, or ignorant, should be given accurate
information by the officers of the court with their “Statement of Rights” so that they can make
reasonable decisions regarding their plea and defense.
132. As direct and proximate results of the rampant case fixing in family law and the
criminal justice system, victims and their families are suffering enormous damages.
133. There should be a stream-lined remedy for voiding domestic and foreign orders:
a. Obtained by fraud;
b. Produced by fraud upon the court;
c. Not based on the facts, evidence or controlling law;
d. Issued outside legal authority;
e. Entered without due process or in violation of equal protection;
f. That have been satisfied;
g. That are arbitrary, capricious, or unfair;
h. That oppress, enslave, or tyrannize.
134. Case in point: Even a layman in the law can see from the facts and evidence13 in case
07-1253 that judge Richard C. Perkins was required by law to vacate the attempts to register the

13
See the 4th Petition in my PETITION BOOK, paragraph 23, and Exhibit MN-102.

22
known void and fictitious Colorado child support order and false arrears balance in Minnesota,
but instead blatantly and repeatedly violated my due process rights under Minn. Stat. §
518C.607, and committed several frauds upon the court and other crimes to grant the
registration, which set in motion the crime spree in Minnesota that still persists to this day.
135. Although any one of Perkins’ case fixing crimes automatically voided his registration
order, three other district court judges and at least three appellate judges have looked the other
way instead of doing their duties under the Doctrine of Judicial Review and other laws14.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds and standing and cause for concern, in behalf of
all case fixing victims, I ask the leaders of the three branches of our Minnesota government to
initiate special legislation, executive orders, and sua sponte judicial action for the purposes of
providing a stream-lined remedy to deal with automatically void orders, not only to help the
thousands of suffering parents and children in Minnesota, but also to open the door for good
judges to do the right thing when they see injustices against families.
RECOVERING DAMAGES FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
136. It is important for all to understand that We the People of the State of Minnesota are
not at fault; our foreign and domestic enemies (the New World Order and their case fixing
minions and other domestic terrorists in the United States) are at fault and should be held totally
responsible and liable for damages to their victims and to the People.
137. As the traitors are brought to justice here in Minnesota, the theory of my family’s
cases, see endnote i, and the cases of other victims will fully develop, and the individuals and
organizations responsible will be identified.
138. Damages to victims should be initially paid by the state, but ultimately recovered
from the traitors.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds and standing, in behalf of all victims and all
citizens of the state of Minnesota, I ask the leaders of the three branches of our Minnesota
government to initiate whatever special legislation, executive orders, and sua sponte judicial
action necessary to recover what the New World Order, their private Federal Reserve, and their
minions, have stolen from our state and its people over the past century or so, recover all other
damages for the citizens of the state of Minnesota, recover all amounts paid to my family and
other victims for damages, and recover and protect our individual and state sovereignty, by:
a. Obtaining reimbursement from the federal government for their fair share;
b. Terminating the employment of those responsible;
c. Eliminating positions of worthless employees;
d. Docking the city, county, state, and federal offices responsible;
e. Freezing and protecting state surpluses;
f. Allowing each town, city and county in Minnesota to freeze and protect their surpluses;
g. Escrowing federal income tax as collateral for damages;
h. Repealing any instrument collateralizing our labor, private property, and public lands;

14
The validity of any judicial determination, and consequently its res judicata effect, is limited by the court’s
compliance with those procedural requirements which due process imposes as jurisdictional prerequisites, Schwartz
v. First Trust Co. (1952) 236 Minn. 165, 52 N.W.2d 290
When conduct of a judicial or administrative official becomes so unfair that litigants are deprived of the
opportunity to fairly present their evidence or be heard, it becomes the duty of the courts to nullify an order based on
such hearing for lack of due process, State v. Duluth, M. & I.R.Ry. (1956) 246 Minn. 383, 75 N.W.2d 398

23
 i. Resolving to review and renounce all unconstitutional federal mandates and regulations;
j. Demilitarizing our local and state law enforcement agencies;
k. Protecting the God-given fundamental rights of all citizens of our state;
l. Protecting our state and individual sovereignty and our right to self-government;
m. Opening up all local and state offices for further suggestions by the People.
139. The good officials in Minnesota should unite to set an example for the other states.
140. May God bless our state.
DATED this 14th Day of July 2012. ______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
603 N. Minnesota Ave.
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 14th Day of July 2012, I mailed a true and correct copy of the
foregoing Confidential Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

24
i
“TRAITORS” are aiding the “New World Order” in the takeover of our federal, state, and local
governments; my theory of my family’s cases is still being developed, but the following is fact:
International banks and organizations run by the “Global Elite” have been planning, organizing, and incrementally
setting up their “New World Order” for centuries. Our Presidents and other high-ranking officials have been talking about it
for decades.
These “globalists” are among the wealthiest few thousand people on Earth and seek to take over governments,
including ours, and consolidate them into a “one world government” under their control. They are thieves. They are
murderers. Their tactics are brutal. They are our “foreign enemies.” They are “traitors.”
By imploding economies, funding both sides of every war, staging terrorism, and oppressing the populations with
tyrannical force, they have stolen quadrillions, much of that from the People of the United States of America.
Through their Military Industrial Complex, Federal Reserve, United Nations, World Trade Organization, and many
other organizations, the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and other traitors, have
taken over many countries, took over Europe and formed the European Union, and took over the United States, Canada, and
Mexico over the past few decades and are planning to consolidate them into their “North American Union.” This is why our
borders remain open despite 9/11 and other terrorist attacks.
Despite our federal government’s constitutional authority to print our currency, the globalists set up their own private
Federal Reserve, paid off the corrupt factions in our federal government (our “domestic enemies”) to pass the Federal
Reserve Act of 1913, and have charged us billions in interest to print our money. By controlling our money supply and
paying off our domestic enemies to collateralize our labor through incrementally increasing income taxes and through the
Social Security Act of 1935, to collateralize our private property through incrementally increasing property taxes, and to
collateralize our National Parks and other public lands, they have stolen over one quadrillion dollars from our ancestors,
from us, and from our progeny, have seized control of most of our natural resources and have slowly enslaved us and many
generations to come.
The globalists were behind the 2008 market crash and the unconstitutional bailouts. Most Americans believe that the
bailouts totaled $700 billion when, in actuality, the traitors stole over 23 trillion in that one scandal alone.
Our foreign enemies have already taken over our federal government, and with the help of corrupt federal officials are
now working to take control of the states and our local communities. It seems as though the traitors have seized, or bought,
control of Minnesota and Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties.
The case fixing alleged in my complaints is just a small segment of the organized worldwide crime ring. Justice is
being bought and sold on a wide scale. Billions of dollars trade hands annually in bribes, kickbacks, payoffs, favors, gifts,
etc., especially in family law and the criminal justice system.
Our local, state and federal agencies associated with family law and the criminal justice system are being operated like
a mafia; and, although most federal officials know about the racketeering, they look the other way so they can obtain larger
and larger appropriations from Congress each year.
Simply put, many family law ‘professionals’ are churning and fixing cases for extra profits and federal funding; once
the corrupt officers of the court have the families’ financial information, they pit moms and dads against each other in
unnecessary ‘custody battles’ until they’re broke, dole out restraining orders like candy, fill up the jails with distraught
parents, deviate from the presumptions of equality to jack up the child support orders, and many other illegal actions, all
designed to pad their numbers for state and federal funding; from which, many of the racketeers have found ways to line
their own pockets.
And once the family is broken and separated, many of the unfairly classed “noncustodial” parents, normally the
‘breadwinner’ and normally the father, are forced to fight non-stop to see their children and to maintain contact with them,
are blocked from modifying their child support and denied access to the courts, and are treated like criminals and obstructed
by law enforcement in their pursuit of protection and justice for their families.
My family is only one of thousands of families that are purposely destroyed and separated each year by the New World
Order, to not only weaken our society, but also to bilk the families they destroy and to cheat the American taxpayer out of
billions of dollars each year.
In fact, in the frenzy for federal funding and extra profit across the United States and around the World over the past
few decades, hundreds-of-thousands of families have been destroyed, millions of children have been forced to grow up
without one or both of their parents, and trillions of dollars have been stolen from taxpayers.
Most people, including myself, thought this very bazaar at first. But after witnessing the corruption for myself, and
investigating and researching, it makes perfect sense to me now. I know the truth about our government and can see that
open bribery by the Obama Administration to get their healthcare bill through, open insider trading by Congress, open arms
dealing and drug dealing by our federal government, and intentionally unconstitutional spending to bankrupt our Country,
all speak for themselves.
Don’t get me wrong: I believe that most government employees work hard, love their families and their neighbors and
country just like I do. Many good people were sucked into the New World Order’s covert plans to takeover our nation and
states just by doing as told in their jobs. Most had no idea that they were participating in treasonous high-crimes. I know

25
now that many local and state officials are being forced to act outside their authority against local citizens, or to do
unconstitutional things, under the constant threat of being fired, or worse.
I know what that feels like; I have lived in constant fear for over seven years of the next knock on my door and the next
crime against my family by our totally corrupt and out-of-control federal government. Hopefully, it is not to late for
Minnesota and our local communities.

ii
“Case fixing” and “case fixers” are just what the words imply:
In my civil and criminal complaints, I call the corrupt and their actions what they are. I mean no disrespect to any
government official that does his or her job within the law. The case fixers that ruined my family and that are keeping me
away from my five children are dishonorable people that break the law and intentionally harm parents, the young, the old,
the poor, and the ignorant, for profit. Many local, state, and federal government officials are racketeering in family law and
in the criminal justice system. The scandal is enormous. Justice is being bought and sold all across the United States. I have
a ‘mountain’ of evidence and a growing list of other victims to prove it. And, because the case fixing has continued against
my family with impunity and unabated here in Minnesota, I am now exposing it and will be helping other victims expose it
and obtain justice as well.
Court cases are fixed to increase profits and federal funding.
Cases are fixed in a variety of ways by judges, attorneys, prosecutors, public defenders, guardian ad litems, law
enforcement officials, child support enforcement officials, and other officers of the court; and by court reporters, court
administrators, probation and parole agents, treatment specialists, and other court cronies; who are willing to commit crimes
such as fraud upon the court, mail fraud, perjury, subornation of perjury, extortion, conspiracy against rights, deprivation of
due process and other rights, acting outside authority, issuing false orders and fictitious obligations, etc., or who are willing
to obstruct justice or influence the proper administration of law by refusing to investigate, refusing to apprehend, refusing to
charge, or otherwise neglecting official duties, executing false arrest warrants and serving other unlawful orders, processing
fictitious obligations, manufacturing evidence, framing defendants, falsifying documents, altering records or accounts,
tampering with witnesses, denying access to the court system, etc.
Case fixing is never done out of ignorance or inadvertence - it is a willful, conspired, calculated, treasonous crime; like
the open bribery to obtain passage of Obama’s healthcare bill and open insider trading by Congress, the case fixers commit
their crimes with impunity right in the faces of their victims.

iii
Family law and criminal justice cases are being fixed all across the United States:
The following is an abbreviated list of case fixing tactics being used against parents, pro se litigants, indigents, criminal
defendants, the young, the old, the ignorant, and crime victims:
Judges:
1. “Impute” income to jack up child support orders.
2. Lower a fit parent's parenting time to jack up child support orders.
3. Dole out restraining orders like candy.
4. Allow perjury and other fraud upon the court.
5. Promote fraud upon the court.
6. Commit fraud upon the court in their orders.
7. Suppress evidence.
8. Ignore evidence of criminal misconduct and prosecutorial misconduct.
9. Ignore precedence.
10. Deviate from the presumptions of equal custody, decision making, parenting time, etc., without a showing
of parental unfitness.
11. Refuse to enforce visitation orders, but enforce custody orders.
12. Deviate from the presumption of truth in affidavits without cause or reason.
13. Deny applications by indigents for fee waiver status, deny applications for crime victim services to
victims, and refuse services to criminal defendants.
14. Criminalize child support ‘debtors.’
15. Order excessive bail and require ‘cash-only’ payments.
16. Hold criminal defendants without bail to maximize jail time for federal funding.
17. Issue false arrest warrants.
18. Deny access to the court system.
19. Label pro se litigants, and victims that fight back, “frivolous” and “vexatious.”
Attorneys:
1. Learn of the parents' finances from their Financial Affidavits, conspire with opposing counsel, and churn
the case until both parents are broke.
2. Lie about all material facts.

26
 3. Pit moms against dads in "custody battles" knowing they are fit parents and entitled to equal time.
4. Encourage domestic violence scams.
5. Encourage “Parental Alienation” and other child abuses to turn the kids against their other parent.
6. Break up the family in any way imaginable.
7. Sacrifice as many childhoods and parenthoods as possible to become rich.
Prosecutors:
1. Label all defendants a ‘flight-risk’ to jack up the bail orders and maximize extortions.
2. Put say 10% of the cash bails posted on the books and divvy up 90% with the other racketeers.
3. Refuse to dismiss cases that 'ought not to be prosecuted.'
4. Refuse to answer counterclaims.
5. Refuse to answer discovery requests.
6. Knowingly advance cases without establishing probable cause and invent probable cause.
7. Knowingly advance cases without jurisdiction and assume jurisdiction.
8. Knowingly advance fallacious arguments and openly commit fraud upon the court.
9. Knowingly violate their oaths of office, both as an attorney and as a prosecutor.
10. Withhold exculpatory evidence.
11. Participate in the altering of exhibits.
12. Threaten and intimidate defendants and their relatives to take unfair plea-deals in favor of the state, which
many times are designed to be the maximum fines, jail time, and ‘treatment’ accessible by law for the charge if
they were found guilty by a jury.
Public Defenders:
1. Refuse to do anything to defend.
2. Refuse to do anything in writing.
3. Refuse to move for dismissal, challenge probable cause, challenge jurisdiction, etc.
4. Refuse to obtain transcripts.
5. Refuse to do discovery.
6. Refuse to subpoena any witnesses.
7. Refuse to file court documents, or just present them in court so the clerks can throw them away.
8. Make only verbal statements in court and only statements that will benefit the racketeers.
9. Intentionally fail to object to undermine any appeals.
10. Participate in the altering of exhibits.
11. Scare their ‘clients’ and their clients’ relatives with large fines and long prison sentences if they don’t take
the unfair plea-deals designed to be the maximum fines, jail time, and ‘treatment’ accessible by law for the charge
if the defendant were found guilty by a jury.
12. Answer clients’ questions with “We’ll talk about it in court,” and then scare the client on his day in court
so that he will relinquish his bail money for the plea-deal conspired with the prosecutor.
Law Enforcement:
1. Tell crime victims that they should get an attorney to correctly report the crimes.
2. Refuse to look at evidence.
3. Refuse to do investigations.
4. Refuse equal protection.
5. Refuse crime victim services.
6. Help paint the 'breadwinner' in divorces as a bad parent.
7. Manufacture evidence against criminal defendants.
8. Payoff snitches or pad their commissary accounts to rat out their friends and relatives.
9. Shakedown criminal defendants while in jail.
10. Threaten and intimidate the accused and their relatives to help facilitate the unfair plea-deals for the other
corrupt officers of the court, to maximize fines, jail time, treatment, and other lucrative money making strategies of
the racketeers.
Court Administration; State and Federal Clerks:
1. Deny access to the judicial system.
2. Refuse to file court documents.
3. Refuse to provide court forms.
4. Refuse to seal subpoenas.
5. Refuse to serve complaints for indigents.
6. Throw away or misplace indigents' IFP applications and other court documents.
7. Alter the Docket or ‘Register of Actions’ when decisions are appealed.
8. List the motions and other pleadings of pro se litigants as “Other Document” to help fix appeals.

27
 9. Rename or renumber exhibits, or lump several exhibits under one number, so some or all can be withheld
in the event of appeal.
Court Reporters:
1. Refuse to produce transcripts.
2. Alter transcripts when decisions are appealed.
3. Provide timely transcripts to custodial parents, prosecutors, and plaintiffs, but delay transcripts for months
or deny altogether for noncustodial parents, defendants, indigents, pro se litigants, etc.
Probation/Parole Officers:
1. “Violate” their clients for noncompliance knowing they are innocent.
2. Invent charges.
3. Manufacture evidence.
4. Deny due processes.
5. Cause the “offenders”’ re-incarceration on known false charges.
Child Support Enforcement caseworkers:
1. Refuse to verify facts, review, adjust, modify, and other due processes related to child support.
2. Invent false facts.
3. Refuse to disclose custodial parent’s application and cover up fraud.
4. Refuse to credit payments.
5. Alter Title IV-D accounts.
6. Refuse to correct interstate accounts under the guise of the 'full faith and credit' laws.
7. Steal and extort from the noncustodial parents.
8. Lien and levy bank accounts without due process, even kids' trust accounts if held under S.S.# of
noncustodial parent.
9. Send Lien & Levy Notices to the bank, but hold the noncustodial parents’ notices so they will miss the
appeal period.
10. Levy bank accounts repeatedly just to increase federal funding.
11. Suspend driver's licenses without due process.
12. Refuse to use appropriate discretion to reinstate driver’s licenses when warranted.
13. Report known false arrears balances to credit reporting agencies without due process.
14. Commit and suborn perjury.
15. Increase support collection without notice or hearing; then garnish from paycheck.
16. Allow custodial parents to use child support money for expenses not related to child care.
17. Deny modification unless unemployed noncustodial parent can prove they are mentally or physically
incapacitated.
Child Protective Services (CPS) caseworkers:
1. Deny due process and equal protection if contacted by the noncustodial parent.
2. Ignore the child abuse laws when contacted by the noncustodial parent.
3. Refuse to investigate child abuse reports by noncustodial parents.
4. Refuse to interview the witnesses of noncustodial parents.
5. Ask the kids leading questions during investigations and misquote them in reports if they say anything
nice about the noncustodial parent.
6. Manufacture evidence.
7. Commit and suborn perjury.
8. Defraud law enforcement and the courts for the custodial parent.
Others ‘Cronies’ Involved:
Guardian Ad Litems (GALs); "Child and Family Investigators" (CFIs); Custody Evaluators; Psychologists;
Women's Shelters; Mediators; ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution' personnel; ‘Counselors’ and ‘Treatment’
Specialists.

iv
The Minnesota cases are far past just an appearance of prejudice and impropriety; the case fixers were
automatically disqualified when they committed their first crime:
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that "Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain
reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to
conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified." Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162
(1994)
Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of
partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the
reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985)… That Court also

28
stated that Section 455(a) "requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably
be questioned…Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the
judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir.
1989)
In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that "It is important that the litigant not only
actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice." The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed
the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038
(1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954)
No judge should hear case if litigant has reason to believe judge is prejudiced. State v. Ketterer, 244 Minn. 127, 128, 69
N.W.2d 115, 116 (1955)
An attorney may be removed or suspended for subornation of perjury, In re Segal (1958) 251 Minn. 574, 87 N.W.2d
839; or for fraud upon the court or any other action to fix a case against an opponent or in favor of a client, Conley v. United
States (8th Cir. 1932) 59 F.2d
In addition to the case fixing crimes, the judges repeatedly violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and the attorneys and
other officers of the court repeatedly violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, any one of which automatically
disqualified them from the cases, lost jurisdiction and rendered their orders void.

v
The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines are clear:
(The very first paragraph): “The purpose of the sentencing guidelines is to establish rational and consistent sentencing
standards which reduce sentencing disparity and ensure that sanctions following conviction of a felony are proportional to
the severity of the offense of conviction and the extent of the offender's criminal history. Equity in sentencing requires (a)
that convicted felons similar with respect to relevant sentencing criteria ought to receive similar sanctions, and (b) that
convicted felons substantially different from a typical case with respect to relevant criteria ought to receive different
sanctions.”
Nowhere in the 92-page document is a No Contact order authorized for child support matters. It is only authorized in
the severest of domestic violence cases; and only to prevent contact with the other adult. Baxter, Zehnder Fischer and
Kraemer’s effort to prevent my contact with my children is being done in desperation knowing now that my kids will be
coming to Minnesota to testify in any civil or criminal case that goes to trial; the concerted effort by the Minnesota and
Colorado case fixers to prevent resolution and keep my broken family separated is especially cruel and sickening when
considering that all involved know that my five kids and I haven’t seen each other for over 5 years and have been cut off
from all communications for nearly 4 years.
This is only one of many crimes that will hopefully send the case fixers to prison for life.

vi
As direct and proximate results of the crime sprees in Colorado and Minnesota over the past seven years,
my five living children and I have suffered the following damages:
a. We have been separated from each other since May 2007;
b. We have been cutoff from all communications with each other since August 2008;
c. My children have missed out on over 7 years of the fruits of the loving relationships we used to have before
our family was destroyed in Colorado, including my care and custody, my love and companionship, and my tutelage
and other abilities as a father;
d. Instead, each of my 5 children has been subjected by their mother, her sisters, and her friends, to years of
intense and relentless brainwashing, “Parental Alienation,” and other emotional child abuses; have witnessed many
things that would be traumatic for an adult and have been subjected to true domestic terror for many years; have been
totally brainwashed against me; have had each of their relationships with me totally sabotaged; have been forced to
grow up in a fatherless environment filled with greed, hatred, and crime; and do not know what reality is anymore;
e. I have missed out on over 7 years of what is most precious to me in life: my family and my 5 relationships
with my children; I lost my parental right to the care, custody, companionship, and love of my 5 children, and all the
fruits of the happy family I once had;
f. Instead, I have been forced to helplessly witness my wife’s, her sisters’, and her friends’ relentless sabotages
of my relationships with each child and their sickening emotional abuses of each child to turn them against me; I
have been forced to helplessly witness my wife’s denials of visitation and contact and her plan to force our children
to grow up in a fatherless environment filled with hatred, greed, and crime; and I have been forced to helplessly
witness my wife’s brainwashing of each of our children against me to have them believe that I abandoned them and
do not love them anymore; and, I have been subjected to over 7 years of deprivation of my right to protect my
children from the evils of the world and from further harm by their mother and the states;

29
 g. For over 7 years, my children and I have suffered from the intentional inflictions of emotional distress on
me by my wife and her sisters and friends; I, and likely each of my children, have experienced severe and ongoing
emotional distresses, including but not limited to suffering, fright, horror, nervousness, grief, worry, anguish, shock,
and anxiety;
h. My children and I have missed out on: thousands of hours of my parenting time; 5 Thanksgivings; 6
Christmases; 6 Spring Breaks; 5 summer vacations; 36 birthday parties; hundreds of school activities, hundreds of
sporting events, many Girl Scout and Church events, many award ceremonies; about 2500 family suppers and 2500
evening sports sessions; over 5000 homework sessions; approximately 350 “park-hopping” trips and other family
outings; about 30 camping trips, 35 snowmobiling trips, 35 skiing trips, 30 boating trips; our long-awaited once-in-a-
childhood Disney trip; thousands of phone calls, emails, and talks; thousands of hugs, kisses, high-fives; and all other
moments that are typically shared by parents and their children;
i. My 2 oldest sons and I have missed out their high school experiences and their graduations; and I have
helplessly witnessed from afar the ongoing abuses of all 5 of my children by school personnel and others in their
community acting on my wife’s orders;
j. For over 7 years, I, and likely each of my children, have suffered grievously from fatigue and helplessness;
have suffered through hundreds of sleepless or restless nights; have suffered from many bouts of depression in
varying degrees, have suffered from an indescribable longing or yearning or heartache that is a persistent dull but
terrible pain; have suffered from lack of concentration and flashbacks to past good and bad times; have suffered from
fear of my wife’s next abuse or crime, fear of my wife’s sisters’ next abuse or crime, fear of my wife’s friends’ next
abuse or crime, fear of the next abuse or crime by the state, fear of the next visit by police, fear of my next arrest; fear
of the next false order by a judge, fear of losing even more, and fear of the future;
k. I have been deprived for over 7 years of my right to educate my children and pass on my talents to them, as I
had planned all through my career; and my children have been deprived of my knowledge and instruction through
most of their adolescence;
l. My children and I have suffered for years from the stigma caused by my being falsely cast in public by my
wife and the state as a “Deadbeat Dad” and other titles designed to portray me in public in a false light; I have
suffered greatly from the humiliation and disgrace, and have lost a great amount of the respect and love my children,
my relatives, my friends and my supporters once had for me; and my children have lost the truth and have been
forced to live in a web of deceit;
m. For over 7 years, because neither my wife nor the states would step forward with the truth, I have been
separated from my home, my business headquarters and my tools and work equipment; have been without a driver’s
license since December 2006; have been indigent and supported by relatives since January 2007; have been
unemployed since October 2007; and have been forced to work double-time hours fighting against a never-ending
pursuit in Colorado and Minnesota of my payment of child support for the second time so the states can profit from
federal funding in the Child Support Enforcement Program; in addition, although my child support obligations are
paid-in-full, I would have paid more if I could so my children would have had some extras, but because of the
ongoing deceit, my children have suffered the loss of my extra support and I have suffered the disgrace of being
supported by relatives;
n. My children and I continue to suffer substantial damages including great pain and emotional distress; and
we will greatly suffer until our family is reunited;
o. We will suffer from irreparable injuries for the rest of our lives; and
p. We will never be the same.
vii
Precedence:
In 2008, in one of the largest verdicts to an individual in history, a Nevada jury awarded $388 million to a 70-year-old
inventor who claimed he was hounded by California tax authorities for 15 years.
Marciano v. Fahs (2009) Los Angeles jury awarded a record defamation verdict of $370 million, including $25 million
in punitive damages, to five former employees of Guess Jeans mogul Georges Marciano.
General Holding Inc. v. Cathcart (2009) $812,833,692 awarded in RICO case 2:06-CV-01121-DCN, 2/26/2009.
Auerbach Acquisition Associates Inc. v. Daily (2009) $350,000,000 awarded in fraud case, Los Angeles Co., Calif.,
Super. Ct., BC285134, 5/11/2009
Garner v. BP Products North America Inc. (2009) $100,326,256 awarded for workplace negligence, S.D. Texas, 3:07-
CV-00221, 12/18/2009
Hazard v. Wakefield (2009) $100,250,000 awarded in wrongful death case, Atlantic Co., N.J., Super. Ct., ATL-L-139-
03, 10/1/2009
viii
Compensatory and punitive damages will be sought for:
1. Destruction of my family;

30
 2. Negligence, gross negligence, and criminal negligence;
3. Fraud, theft, conversion, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, false imprisonment, racketeering,
and other state and federal crimes;
4. Defamation, distress, mental suffering, humiliation, disgrace, cruelty, oppression, and other aggravating
circumstances;
5. Destruction of business, theft of real, personal and business property, loss of inventory,
destruction/alteration of property including alteration of business headquarters, dismantling of log storage shed,
burning processed logs as firewood, and negligent damage to property;
6. Loss of use of business headquarters, loss of use of motor vehicles, loss of use of contractor tools and
equipment, restoration of all real and personal property, depreciation and diminution in value;
7. Loss of inheritances, loss of use of family home, and loss of use of recreational vehicles;
8. Loss of income, expenses, legal fees, the $5,000.00 posted by my brother for bail, etc.;
9. Child abuse, spousal abuse, alienation of affections; Loss of parenting time, loss of care, custody, and
companionship, loss of family events and memories, loss of enjoyment of life;
10. Pain and suffering, future pain and suffering;
11. Interest.
I want to be compensated for every second of parenthood that I missed out on with my kids while they were growing up
and I want each of my kids compensated for every second of childhood they missed out on with me.
Because our case represents perhaps the greatest assault on an American family in history, in multiple lawsuits I will
seek precedent setting damage awards for my family, in Colorado and Minnesota, of at least $500 million for each of my
five living children and me, for a total of at least $3 billion. If the states continue to ignore the racketeering and the crime
sprees against my family, I will ask the juries to increase the awards even further.
Our corrupt and out-of-control federal government and the “foreign and domestic enemies” that have already
overthrown our federal government will also be sued.

ix
I invoke the original jurisdiction of the Minnesota Supreme Court on the following grounds:
The supreme court is a constitutional appellate court with original jurisdiction only in the particular instances
authorized by the constitution; hence its appellate jurisdiction is general and its original jurisdiction is special and restricted.
However, it has general power of supervision, review, and cassation over the courts of Minnesota, Lauritsen v. Seward
(1906) 98 Minn. 313, 109 N.W. 404
The constitution provides that the supreme court shall have original jurisdiction in remedial cases of extraordinary
proceedings, and for writs of prohibition, mandamus, certiorari, quo warranto, and habeas corpus, Minn. Stat. §§ 480.04,
589.02; Larson v. LeMere (1945) 220 Minn. 25, 18 N.W.2d 696
The supreme court also has the power in an original proceeding to determine whether a constitutional officer is
attempting to usurp power which is not granted to him by the constitution or by the laws of the state, State ex rel. Palmer v.
Perpich (1971) 289 Minn. 149, 182 N.W.2d 182
Original jurisdiction does not mean exclusive jurisdiction, Crowell v. Lambert (1865) 10 Minn. 369 (Gil. 295)
An action for declaratory judgment brought in the district court may exist side-by-side with the jurisdiction of the
supreme court to entertain original proceedings, Burnsville Twp. V. City of Bloomington (1962) 264 Minn. 133, 117 N.W.2d
746
The power to prohibit an improper exercise of jurisdiction embraces the power to issue ex parte an order designed to
maintain the status quo pending a hearing on an application for a writ of prohibition … Any individual justice of the
supreme court, either in vacation or in term, may execute orders on behalf of the court pursuant to statute, In re Daly (1969)
284 Minn. 567, 171 N.W.2d 818
Although it is provided by the constitution [Article VI, Section 2] that there shall be no trial by jury in the supreme
court, in an original proceeding where a referee is appointed to make findings of fact, such findings have the effect of a
special verdict of a jury, State ex rel. Stuntz v. City of Chisholm (1937) 199 Minn. 403, 273 N.W. 235
The supreme court need not wait until it is important to discharge its official duties before asserting its inherent power
to preserve what is clearly a judicial function, Sharwood v. Hatfield (1973) 296 Minn. 416, 210 N.W.2d 275
It is within the inherent power of the supreme court to give a decision prospective or retrospective application without
offending constitutional provisions, Schultz v. Chicago & N.W. Ry. (1970) 286 Minn. 231, 175 N.W.2d 177

x
My letter to Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton on August 8, 2011:
JOHN M. HENTGES
827 Commerce St., Le Sueur, MN 56058 osmundson2005@aol.com
August 8, 2011

31
Governor Mark Dayton STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
130 State Capitol
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Re: URGENT help needed.
Dear Governor Dayton:
I am turning my family’s crisis completely over to you, as I am no match for the criminals that have found their way into our
local, state, and federal government offices. As a victim of several very serious crimes, I request full State protection and
services.
Enclosed along with this letter is a large book entitled “PETITIONS TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA
SUPREME COURTS,” which contains:
1. Tab 1: PETITION FOR EN BANC REVIEW to the Minnesota Supreme Court with a copy of my PETITION
FOR EN BANC REVIEW and Exhibit CO-100 to the Colorado Supreme Court, both dated April 12, 2011.
2. Tab 2: PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT with Exhibits CO-101 to CO-110 to the Colorado Supreme
Court, dated April 12, 2011.
3. Tab 3: PETITION FOR RECONCILIATION AND CLOSURE OF TITLE IV-D CASE with Exhibits CSE-1 to
CSE-14 to the Colorado Supreme Court, dated April 30, 2011.
4. Tab 4: PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT with Exhibits MN-101 to MN-109 to the Minnesota
Supreme Court, dated June 9, 2011.
5. Tab 5: ORDER by the Minnesota Supreme Court dismissing my Petition for En Banc Review; Minnesota
Supreme Court Commissioner’s action to un-file and reject my Petition for Reconciliation and Closure of Title IV-
D Case (Tab 3) and Petition for Relief from Judgment (Tab 4); and my re-submittal of the petitions in Tabs 3-4
through the Minnesota Governor’s Office.
Please immediately confirm receipt of these documents at my email address above, and also confirm that you re-submitted
to the Minnesota Supreme Court the two petitions enclosed with my July 7 2011 letter to you. The enclosed copy of my
PETITIONS TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA SUPREME COURTS is yours to keep. Please read it carefully.
Attached to this letter is a recent motion to the court in case 40-CR-09-786 by prosecutor Michelle Zehnder Fischer
requesting an order forfeiting my brother’s $5,000.00, which he paid to bail me out of jail when the crime spree began in the
criminal case. As clearly proven by the 450 pages of evidence attached to my petitions, Zehnder Fischer is a serial case
fixing criminal and should have been arrested a year ago when I began reporting her crimes to local, state and federal
authorities. Please immediately contact the appropriate state authority to obtain my brother’s $5,000.00 and either return it
to me or send it to Colorado Governor John W. Hickenlooper, see #4 under “TO REMEDY THE CIVIL MATTERS:” below.
I firmly believe that employees in your office and at the Attorney General’s office and at the Supreme Court and in our
courts and agencies all over Minnesota are participating in the case fixing, and are preventing you and other high-ranking
officials from receiving the complaints of their victims. Based on my dealings with the case fixers, I believe that Governor
Tim Pawlenty was prevented from seeing my letters to him, Attorney General Lori Swanson has been prevented from
seeing my letters to her, the Supreme Court Justices were prevented by the Commissioner from seeing my 3 petitions with
evidence following my Petition for En Banc Review, and you were prevented from receiving my previous letters to you, see
attached, and my letter to you on July 7 2011, including a copy of my June 9 letter to Lori Swanson to resolve all the
matters by July 31 2011 (see Tab 5); all in an enormous cover up due to the evidence I have.
Without neglecting my family’s crisis, please ‘clean house’ for the People of the State of Minnesota, at least in the
executive branch. Several employees in your office, the Attorney General’s office, and the Departments of Human Services,
should be immediately fired, and hundreds of other state employees who know about the case fixing and have the ability to
help broken families like mine, but look the other way, should lose their jobs.
Because of the neglect by the Attorney General’s Office and the Supreme Court to resolve the Minnesota issues by July 31
2011, I will no longer ‘forgive and forget’ the crimes as I stated in my petitions. I want the criminals prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law and I want my family fully compensated according to precedence in civil and criminal law.
Our Minnesota Constitution, statutes, laws, rules, and precedence, and federal law and precedence, guarantee each of my
five children and me: Resolutions for each claim in my petitions, compensation for our injuries, adequate protection, and
full crime victim services.
TO REMEDY THE CIVIL MATTERS:

32
 1. I cannot get justice for my family, or any other needed service, in the First Judicial District. Please issue an Executive
Order or set in motion whatever action is necessary to change the venue and jurisdiction to the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals,
and to appoint state-paid counsel for my children and me in all civil and criminal matters.
2. Regardless of the denials of due process, shenanigans and apparent cover up of the case fixing now at the Supreme
Court levels in both states, all Colorado and Minnesota orders and judgments, and the jury verdict in case 09-786, are
automatically void by operation of law. Please issue an Executive Order or set in motion whatever action is necessary to verify that
my evidence proves my claims and to obtain the relief from judgment requested in my petition in Tab 4; if needed, please use your
pardoning and other powers as Governor to vacate the jury verdict.
3. Title IV-D Case # 30-289499-44-1A was automatically closed by default pursuant to FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT CASE
CLOSURE REGULATIONS, OEI 06-00-00470. I have asked Colorado Governor John W. Hickenlooper to officially close the case.
Once this is done, please notify the appropriate local, state and federal agencies of the closure and ensure that my name, address, Social
Security number, and all other information is removed from all Minnesota government computers.
4. Regardless of the rejection of my settlement proposals in my petitions, we are due reimbursement of actual amounts
illegally taken from us, and actual expenses to deal with the crime spree. I have asked Governor Hickenlooper to reimburse us in
full. Minnesota is responsible for at least half of my expenses from June 2007 to the present. Please issue an Executive Order to the
appropriate state official to reimburse Colorado (or me if any delay) in the amount of at least $23,972.88.
5. Regardless of the rejection of my settlement proposals, I am due compensation for my lost income since January 2005,
which, according to the Colorado divorce judge is $7,000.00 per month; because I worked double-time hours dealing with the
crime spree against my family, my actual lost income is at least $14,000.00 per month. I have asked Governor Hickenlooper to
compensate me in full. Minnesota is responsible for at least half of my lost income from June 2007 to the present (50 months @
$7,000.00 per month). Please issue an Executive Order to the appropriate state official to reimburse Colorado (or me if any delay) in
the amount of $350,000.00.
6. When I am reunited with my kids in Colorado, I will need to devote double-time hours to rehabilitating my children and
restoring my family, our way of life, my business, our futures, and all other aspects of our lives that were sabotaged by the
States, which will mean that I will need ongoing income. I have asked Governor Hickenlooper to compensate me in full each month.
Minnesota is responsible for at least half of this ongoing income. Please issue an Executive Order to the appropriate state official to
reimburse Colorado (or pay me directly if any delay) accordingly.
7. One of the ways I requested the States compensate my kids for missing out on all that I planned to teach them during
their upbringing, was to provide full-ride scholarships to the college or university of their choice in Colorado or Minnesota. I
have asked Governor Hickenlooper to reimburse my son Brandon for all his expenses at the Colorado School of Mines last year and to
prepay Brandon and Tyler for their tuition, books, room and board, and all other expenses for the 2011/2012 school-year. Minnesota is
responsible for half of this; please issue an Executive Order to the appropriate state official to reimburse Colorado accordingly.
8. I will still consider a reasonable offer for our pain and suffering and other damages, as requested in paragraphs 86 to 91 of
my PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT to the Minnesota Supreme Court (Tab 4). If you agree that it is in the best interests
of the People of the State of Minnesota, and the state, and my family, to settle and move on, please make a reasonable settlement offer
to me, for all six victims in my family, no later than August 31, 2011.
TO REMEDY THE CRIMINAL MATTERS:
1. Because my settlement proposals were twice rejected, I will no longer forgive and forget the crimes. Please issue an
Executive Order or set in motion whatever action is necessary to summon the first of several state Grand Juries and appoint Special
Prosecutors; and instruct an appropriate state official to make as many copies of my PETITIONS TO THE COLORADO AND
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURTS, as necessary for the criminal actions.
2. Because my settlement proposals were rejected by the State, I will be pressing full charges against all of the case fixers
starting with judges Richard C. Perkins and M. Michael Baxter, prosecutors Brent Christian and Michelle Zehnder Fischer,
and Le Sueur Child Support Enforcement supervisor Tammy Morgan, and request that they be arrested and prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law. Please issue an Executive Order to the Grand Jury to verify probable cause of their crimes from the evidence
attached to my petitions and to indict them as soon as possible, and to the Special Prosecutor to prosecute them for each of my claims
in my petitions and for any other crimes found by the Grand Jury. Please also initiate a request for restraining orders, crime victim
compensation, and all other crime victim services for my family.
3. In addition to those named in my petitions, there are many other local, state and federal officials involved in the case
fixing. Please issue an Executive Order or set in motion whatever actions are necessary to work in conjunction with Colorado officials
to provide for the transcription of my 575 tape-recorded telephone conversations with government officials; to fulfill my FOIA requests
that were denied by county, state, and federal officials; to make copies of my other evidence; and to gather the claims and evidence of
other Minnesota victims. Please also issue an Executive Order to the appropriate state official to provide state-paid counsel and other
services to my family for our lawsuits against the United States and our criminal complaints against the federal employees involved in
the case fixing.
4. I have been retaliated against for blowing the whistle in the past and will need witness protection and other services for
my entire family over the next several years. Please, on your own or with Governor Hickenlooper only, arrange for whistleblower-
like protection, transportation, and accommodations for us, in Colorado, in Minnesota, and in Washington D.C.

33
 5. Please remember at all times: I am not the criminal in this case; I am the victim. My evidence is irrefutable; it
exonerates me and proves clearly and concisely the crimes committed against me in the First Judicial District. Please issue an
Executive Order or set in motion whatever actions are necessary to completely expunge my record, as requested in paragraphs 73 to 75
of my Petition for Relief from Judgment to the Minnesota Supreme Court (Tab 4).
Please do not take offense to my assertion of our rights like everyone else does. I am just a loving father who was sucked
into one of our government’s racketeering schemes, and because I am meticulous in my record-keeping and have evidence
to put several officials in jail, my children, and all resolutions to our issues, are being held hostage to keep us apart and to
control me. I simply want out and I want my family protected from these criminals.
Please do not delay and concentrate first on ending the crime spree; use this letter as a guide to accomplish all that needs to
be done. Feel free to contact me anytime. I look forward to working with you to secure justice for my family and other
families similarly situated.
Thank you in advance for all your help.
Sincerely,
John M. Hentges
In Behalf of the Hentges Family
Bcc.

xi
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2011-08-11-pa-courthouse-kickbacks-sentence_n.htm

Pa. judge gets 28 years in 'kids for cash' case

SCRANTON, Pa. (AP) — A longtime northeastern Pennsylvania judge was ordered to spend nearly three decades in
prison for his role in a massive juvenile justice bribery scandal that prompted the state's high court to toss thousands of
convictions.
Former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. was sentenced Thursday to 28 years in federal prison for taking $1
million in bribes from the builder of a pair of juvenile detention centers in a case that became known as "kids for cash."
Ciaverella, 61, was motionless when the decision was announced and had no reaction. From behind him, where family
members of some of the children he sentenced sat, someone cried out "Woo hoo!"
In the wake of the scandal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court tossed about 4,000 convictions issued by Ciavarella
between 2003 and 2008, saying he violated the constitutional rights of the juveniles, including the right to legal counsel
and the right to intelligently enter a plea.
Ciavarella was tried and convicted of racketeering charges earlier this year. His attorneys had asked for a "reasonable"
sentence in court papers, saying, in effect, that he's already been punished enough. "The media attention to this matter has
exceeded coverage given to many and almost all capital murders, and despite protestation, he will forever be unjustly
branded as the 'Kids for Cash' judge," their sentencing memo said.
Al Fora, Ciaverella's lawyer, called the sentence harsher than expected. Ciaverella surrendered immediately but it was
not immediately known where he would serve his sentence.
Ciaverella, speaking before the sentence was handed down, apologized to the community and to those juveniles that
appeared before him in his court. "I blame no one but myself for what happened," he said, and then denied he had ever
incarcerated any juveniles in exchange for money.
He also criticized U.S. Assistant Attorney Gordon Zubrod for referring to the case as "kids for cash," and said it sank
his reputation. "He backdoored me, and I never saw it coming. Those three words made me the personification of evil,"
Ciaverella said. "They made me toxic and caused a public uproar the likes of which this community has never seen."
Federal prosecutors accused Ciavarella and a second judge, Michael Conahan, of taking more than $2 million in bribes
from the builder of the PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care detention centers and extorting hundreds of thousands
of dollars from the facilities' co-owner. Ciavarella, known for his harsh and autocratic courtroom demeanor, filled the beds
of the private lockups with children as young as 10, many of them first-time offenders convicted of petty theft and other
minor crimes.
The judge remained defiant after his arrest, insisting the payments were legal and denying he incarcerated youths for
money.
The jury returned a mixed verdict following a February trial, convicting him of 12 counts, including racketeering and
conspiracy, and acquitting him of 27 counts, including extortion. The guilty verdicts related to a payment of $997,600 from
the builder.
Conahan pleaded guilty last year and awaits sentencing.

34
xii
Some case law regarding private attorney generals in Minnesota:
The policy of the law is to favor prosecutions for crimes, and it will afford such protection to the citizen prosecuting as
is essential to public justice, Cole v. Curtis (1870) 16 Minn. 182 (Gil. 161); Shafer v. Hertzig (1904) 92 Minn. 171, 99 N.W.
796
As an element of damages, an attorney fee award may be granted on public policy grounds where the plaintiff acts as a
private attorney general, Seaman v. Spring Lake Park Indep. School Dist. No. 16 (D. Minn. 1974) 387 F.Supp. 1168;
Richardson v. Communications Workers (8th Cir. 1976) 530 F.2d 126
The right to choose one’s calling is an essential part of that liberty which is the object of government to protect. A
person’s occupation or calling is his property within the meaning of law, and is entitled to protection as such, Aldrich v.
Wetmore (1893) 52 Minn. 164, 53 N.W. 1072; see State ex rel. Shenk v. State Bd. Of Examiners in Basic Sciences (1933)
189 Minn. 1, 250 N.W. 353
Legal service activities performed by a layman are the practice of law unless they are incident to his regular calling,
Gardner v. Conway (1951) 234 Minn. 468, 48 N.W.2d 788
It has been held that the right of every person to work in his own business is a fundamental right guaranteed to him by
the bill of rights of the state constitution, and by the fourteenth amendment…and any attempt to deprive him of that right is
unlawful, Roraback v. Motion Picture Mach. Operators Union (1918) 140 Minn. 481, 168 N.W. 766; International Bhd. Of
Teamsters Local 309 v. Hanke (1950) 339 U.S. 470; An intentional interference with such a right without lawful
justification, is malicious in law, even if it is from good motives and without express malice, Carnes v. St. Paul Union
Stockyards Co. (1925) 164 Minn. 457, 205 N.W. 630
The first amendment’s protection of association prohibits a state from excluding a person from a profession or
punishing him solely because he is a member of a particular political organization or because he holds certain beliefs, Baird
v. State Bar (1971) 401 U.S. 1; In re Stolar (1971) 401 U.S. 23

xiii
Some case law regarding removal from office:
The governor is authorized to remove certain public officers for malfeasance or nonfeasance in office, Minn. Stat. §
351.03; Larrabee v. Minnesota Tribune Co. (1886) 36 Minn. 141, 30 N.W. 462 (neglect of county attorney to prosecute as
ground for removal)
The governor may suspend county treasurers and other county officials upon a charge of malfeasance or nonfeasance in
office, and remove them if the charge is sustained, Minn. Stat. § 351.08-.10; Conviction of a crime is not essential for the
proceedings, In re Nash (1920) 147 Minn. 383, 181 N.W. 570; General incompetency and neglect of duty are sufficient
grounds for removal under the statutes, State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart (1911) 116 Minn. 313, 133 N.W. 857; The
malfeasance or nonfeasance conduct must relate to something of a substantial nature directly affecting the rights and
interests of the public, State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart; It has reference to evil conduct or an illegal deed … the
performance of an act in official capacity that is wholly illegal and wrongful … Nonfeasance is the neglect or refusal,
without sufficient excuse, to do that which is the officer’s legal duty to do, Jacobsen v. Nagel (1959) 255 Minn. 300, 96
N.W.2d 569
A sheriff as the chief peace officer of his county is responsible both by common and statutory law to keep and conserve
the peace and good order within his county; and he may be removed from office for engaging in any corrupt practice or for
closing his eyes to any illegal activities in his county, In re Olson (1941) 211 Minn. 114, 300 N.W. 398; If a sheriff or
deputy sheriff is found guilty of inefficiency, breach of duty, or misconduct, he may be removed, reduced, or suspended,
and his name may be stricken from the service register, Minn. Stat. § 387.41; see In re Setchell (Minn. 1977) 261 N.W.2d
354 (misconduct need not be willful)
Where no tenure is fixed by law, the power of removal by appointive officers may be exercised arbitrarily at the will of
the appointing power, Oikari v. Independent School Dist. No. 40 (1927) 170 Minn. 301, 212 N.W. 598; State ex rel.
Rockwell v. State Bd. Of Educ. (1942) 213 Minn. 184, 6 N.W.2d 251; The only effect of fixing tenure by statute is that the
appointing power cannot remove the official arbitrarily, but only for cause and after due notice and hearing, State ex rel.
Village of Chisholm v. Bergeron (1923) 156 Minn. 276, 194 N.W. 624
In removal by governor, the rule forbidding conviction on uncorroborated accomplice testimony does not apply …
Evidence of other offenses of the same nature which tend to show a general course of conduct is admissible for the purpose
of corroboration, In re Nash (1920) 147 Minn. 383, 181 N.W. 570; Suspension by the governor prior to the hearing of the
proceeding for removal may be made without a preliminary hearing, Martin v. Dodge County (1920) 146 Minn. 129, 178
N.W. 167; It is the duty of the governor, upon suspension, to appoint an acting officer to perform the duties of the office
during suspension, State ex rel. Carlson v. Strunk (1945) 219 Minn. 529, 18 N.W.2d 457
As a general rule, the power to appoint public officers or employees carries with it the power to remove such officers or
employees unless the power of removal is restricted by statute … where the statutes provide that a public officer or
employee may be removed at the pleasure of the appointing authority, he is removable at will, with or without cause … the
appointing authority cannot renounce or agree not to exercise its power of removal, State ex rel. Stubben v. Board of County
Comm’rs (1966) 273 Minn. 361, 141 N.W.2d 499

35
 The supreme court is authorized by statute [Minn. Stat. § 490.16] to remove judges from their office upon conviction
for a felony, persistent failure to perform their duties, incompetence, habitual intemperance, or conduct prejudicial to the
administration of justice, In re Gillard (1978) 271 N.W.2d 785

xiv
Some case law regarding disbarment:
The supreme court has the inherent power over the admissions of persons to the practice of law, over the discipline and
disbarment of attorneys, and over the regulation of the bar of the state of Minnesota, State ex rel. Stuntz v. City of Chisholm
(1937) 199 Minn. 403, 273 N.W. 235
It is the duty of the bar to remove attorneys from the profession when they have been found deficient in the integrity
and sense of responsibility necessary for the administration of justice, In re Joyce (1954) 242 Minn. 427, 65 N.W.2d 581
The purpose of disciplining an attorney is to guard the administration of justice and to protect the courts, the legal
profession, and the public, In re Smith (1945) 220 Minn. 197, 19 N.W.2d 324
Disciplinary proceedings serve to discharge the supreme court’s responsibility to protect the public, the administration
of justice, and the legal profession, by imposing disciplinary sanctions, including removal from practice, upon those
attorneys who are found to have demonstrated that they do not possess the qualities of character or the professional
competence requisite to the practice of law, In re Daly (1969) 284 Minn. 567, 171 N.W.2d 818
Disciplinary proceedings should be prosecuted with promptness, In re Williams (1946) 221 Minn. 554, 23 N.W.2d 4
Misconduct of an attorney who has not only caused damage to the persons immediately involved, but has brought
disrepute to the legal profession as well, is clearly sufficient to disqualify him from the practice of law, In re Opacak (1960)
257 Minn. 600, 101 N.W.2d 606
An attorney may be removed or suspended for (nearly all have been done to my family or other victims):
Conviction of a felony, Minn. Stat. §§ 481.15, 610.01, 622.06; In re Moses (1932) 186 Minn. 357, 243 N.W. 386
(felonious conspiracy); In re Segal (1958) 251 Minn. 574, 87 N.W.2d 839 (subornation of perjury); Conley v. United
States (8th Cir. 1932) 59 F.2d (case fixing)
Conviction of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, In re Diesen (1928) 173 Minn. 297, 217 N.W. 356
(attempt to evade income tax)
Any deceit or willful misconduct, In re Nunn (1898) 73 Minn. 292, 76 N.W. 38 (altering public records); State Bd.
Of Examiners in Law v. Lane (1904) 93 Minn. 425, 101 N.W. 613 (encouraging witness in criminal case to continue
concealment and avoid attendance); State Bd. Of Examiners in Law v. Davis (1909) 108 Minn. 87, 121 N.W. 1133
(fraudulently acting for adverse party); State Bd. Of Examiners in Law v. DeLamotte (1913) 123 Minn. 54, 142 N.W.
929 (withdrawing motion without knowledge or authority of client); In re Hertz (1918) 139 Minn. 504, 166 N.W.
397 (bringing suit without jurisdiction or authority); In re Garrett (1922) 152 Minn. 300, 188 N.W. 322 (furthered
his own interests against the best interests of his client); In re McGinley (1926) 168 Minn. 224, 209 N.W. 870 (fraud
upon the court and wife in divorce action); Hertz v. United States (8th Cir. 1927) 18 F.2d 52 (falsified affidavit); In re
Bresky (1927) 171 Minn. 490, 214 N.W. 666 (falsified affidavit, and fraud upon the court and client); In re Joyce
(1930) 182 Minn. 156, 234 N.W. 9 (county attorney used and attempted to use criminal process to force collection of
a debt); In re Smith (1931) 183 Minn. 220, 236 N.W. 324 (when called to account for misconduct, sought by
falsehood to hide wrongdoing); In re Friedman (1931) 183 Minn. 350, 236 N.W. 703 (perjury, and knowingly filing
forged documents); In re Hughes (1933) 188 Minn. 460, 247 N.W. 680 (conversion); In re Forbes (1934) 192 Minn.
544, 257 N.W. 329 (defrauding county of funds); In re Tracy (1936) 197 Minn. 35, 266 N.W. 88 (conducting
practice in such a way as to subject legal profession to disrepute); In re Miller (1937) 199 Minn. 295, 271 N.W. 593
(assisted client in fraudulently defeating claim, in giving false testimony, and in making verified false answer in
disbarment proceeding; held to show such absence of ethical standards as to warrant disbarment); In re Gennow
(1939) 206 Minn. 389, 289 N.W. 887 (displayed ‘dilatoriness’ over long period, with such inattention to clients’
affairs as to result in damage to them and disrepute to profession); In re Smith (1940) 208 Minn. 23, 292 N.W. 620
(willful deception of board of examiners and supreme court); In re Pluto (1941) 211 Minn. 308, 300 N.W. 897
(misconduct with a jury); In re Gross (1961) 260 Minn. 160, 109 N.W.2d 57 (lack of honesty and integrity); ); In re
Boozier (1961) 260 Minn. 571, 110 N.W.2d 440 (refusing to file answer and other pleadings); ); In re Raskin (1976)
307 Minn. 233, 239 N.W.2d 459 (series of misrepresentation to induce people)
Misconduct which reflects lack of integrity in performance of professional duties, In re Drexler (1971) 290 Minn.
542, 188 N.W.2d 436 (jury tampering, misrepresentation, conversion, concealing and diverting assets)
Professional irresponsibility, through gross negligence and sheer incompetence, to a degree revealing total
unfitness to discharge the duties of a lawyer, In re Williams (1946) 221 Minn. 554, 23 N.W.2d 4; In re Williams
(1967) 249 Minn. 600, 83 N.W.2d 115 (willful participation in the destruction or suppression of exculpable evidence)
Unethical and unprofessional conduct, In re Larson (1941) 210 Minn. 414, 298 N.W. 707
Conduct consisting of willful disobedience of court orders, advising others to disregard an order of the supreme
court, and violations of the canons of professional ethics, reflecting professional irresponsibility, In re Daly (1969)
284 Minn. 567, 171 N.W.2d 818 (willful disobedience to a single valid court order may alone justify disbarment)

36
 Deliberately deceiving the court, In re Nilva (1963) 266 Minn. 576, 123 N.W.2d 803 (found guilty not only of
obstructing administration of justice but also of subverting that loyalty to truth without which he cannot be a lawyer
in the real sense of the word)
Flagrant disregard of the attorney-client relationship, In re Joyce (1954) 242 Minn. 427, 65 N.W.2d 581
Neglect in disposing of legal matters which are accepted, In re Henning (1972) 294 Minn. 336, 201 N.W.2d 208
The question before the court is the fitness of the attorney to continue as a member of the legal profession, In re Rerat
(1950) 232 Minn. 1, 44 N.W.2d 273; In re Peterson (1961) 260 Minn. 339, 110 N.W.2d 9; the niceties of technical pleading
need not be observed in presenting a disciplinary matter to the court for investigation and determination, In re Rerat
The conduct of judges is subject to the same standards, In re Bartholet (1972) 293 Minn. 495, 198 N.W.2d 152 (probate
judge received “kickbacks” from appraisers)
In disciplinary proceedings, the primary duty of the court is to protect the public, and sympathy for the respondent
cannot deter the court from disbarment, In re Hanson (1960) 258 Minn. 231, 103 N.W.2d 863 (court is charged with duty of
controlling qualifications and conduct of attorneys in order that there may be no compromise whatever of moral or ethical
standards upon which functioning of legal system depends); In re Streater (1962) 262 Minn. 538, 115 N.W.2d 729 (where
there is clear violation of an attorney’s duty to his clients or to the public, order of disbarment is required)
Clear violation of lawyer’s duties compels an order of disbarment, In re Bialick (1974) 298 Minn. 376, 215 N.W.2d 613
(totality of conduct warranted disbarment)
Under Minnesota Supreme Court XXI, if the accused defaults, an appropriate order of discipline will be entered upon
the assumption that he is guilty as charged, In re Temple (1938) 203 Minn. 365, 281 N.W. 290; In re Timm (1954) 242
Minn. 577, 64 N.W.2d 767
There is no statute of limitations in actions of disbarment, In re Heinze (1951) 233 Minn. 391, 47 N.W.2d 123

xv
The Constitution of the State of Minnesota, Article VIII, Impeachment and Removal From Office:
Section 1. Impeachment powers. The house of representatives has the sole power of impeachment through a
concurrence of a majority of all its members. All impeachments shall be tried by the senate. When sitting for that purpose,
senators shall be upon oath or affirmation to do justice according to law and evidence. No person shall be convicted without
the concurrence of two-thirds of the senators present.
Sec. 2. Officers subject to impeachment; grounds; judgment. The governor, secretary of state, auditor, attorney general
and the judges of the supreme court, court of appeals and district courts may be impeached for corrupt conduct in office or
for crimes and misdemeanors; but judgment shall not extend further than to removal from office and disqualification to hold
and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit in this state. The party convicted shall also be subject to indictment, trial,
judgment and punishment according to law. [Amended, November 2, 1982; November 3, 1998]
Sec. 3. Suspension. No officer shall exercise the duties of his office after he has been impeached and before his
acquittal.
Sec. 4. Service of impeachment papers. No person shall be tried on impeachment before he has been served with a copy
thereof at least 20 days previous to the day set for trial.
Sec. 5. Removal of inferior officers. The legislature of this state may provide for the removal of inferior officers for
malfeasance or nonfeasance in the performance of their duties.
Sec. 6. Recall. A member of the senate or the house of representatives, an executive officer of the state identified in
section 1 of article V of the constitution, or a judge of the supreme court, the court of appeals, or a district court is subject to
recall from office by the voters. The grounds for recall of a judge shall be established by the supreme court. The grounds for
recall of an officer other than a judge are serious malfeasance or nonfeasance during the term of office in the performance of
the duties of the office or conviction during the term of office of a serious crime. A petition for recall must set forth the
specific conduct that may warrant recall. A petition may not be issued until the supreme court has determined that the facts
alleged in the petition are true and are sufficient grounds for issuing a recall petition. A petition must be signed by a number
of eligible voters who reside in the district where the officer serves and who number not less than 25 percent of the number
of votes cast for the office at the most recent general election. Upon a determination by the secretary of state that a petition
has been signed by at least the minimum number of eligible voters, a recall election must be conducted in the manner
provided by law. A recall election may not occur less than six months before the end of the officer’s term. An officer who is
removed from office by a recall election or who resigns from office after a petition for recall issues may not be appointed to
fill the vacancy that is created. [Adopted, November 5, 1996]

37
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for other victims being helped by John M. Hentges),

Plaintiffs,

v. FIRST ADDENDUM
TO CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

TRAITORS,

Defendants.

I, affiant John M. Hentges, in behalf of other victims of government abuse, bring this first
addendum to my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012, against traitors
in Waseca County for their crimes against the Muslof family, and with additional information
regarding the crimes by traitors in Le Sueur County against the Crosby family and by traitors
with the Department of Corrections against the McIntosh family, and state:
THIS FIRST ADDENDUM IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
 AFFIDAVIT
1. Since submitting my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, additional
information has come to my attention regarding ongoing government abuse by traitors against
the following families:
THE MUSLOF FAMILY:
2. The Muslof family is made up of a good mom and dad, 4 biological children, and 6
adopted children; they live at 624 - 7th Ave. SE, Waseca, Minnesota, and can be reached at 507-
461-3751.
3. I met Alexandra Muslof, one of the biological daughters, when both of us testified to
Congress via the documentary “Lawless America - The Movie,” on August 7, 2012.
4. Ms. Muslof described the horror she felt as her six adopted siblings were kidnapped
by Waseca Child Protective Services (CPS); as her mother and father were framed as bad parents
by CPS in conspiracy with the guardian ad litem, the prosecutor, local law enforcement and even
the local newspaper; as the judge, who had previously finalized the adoption of her little sister
into the Muslof family, resigned from the current case and then mysteriously took the case back
less than a day later and agreed with the other traitors that her parents were somehow unfit and
their adopted children should be taken back by the county; and as her mother was framed on a
bogus criminal charge and jailed for six months in an unlawful sentence.
5. There is absolutely no doubt that the scandal is being perpetuated for federal funding.
6. The traitors in her case are child protective services caseworker Amy Roesler,
guardian ad litem Heather Seikne, prosecutor Rachel Cornelius, and judge Larry M. Collins.
7. Alexandra, her father (Jeff), and her mother, have relevant evidence and testimony to
attest the case fixing against their family in Waseca County.
8. As a direct and proximate result of the case fixing and the traitors’ other criminal
activities, the Muslof’s home is in foreclosure.
THE CROSBY FAMILY:
9. Matt Crosby is currently in prison; see case 40-CR-12-370.
10. I met Matt in the Le Sueur County Jail when both of us were arrested on the same
day, December 16, 2011; see Matt’s original case 40-CR-11-228.
11. On the morning of December 17, 2011, I witnessed Sheriff Tom Doherty yelling at
Matt at the top of his lungs in front of the other inmates; I knew beforehand that Doherty is
corrupt and has been participating in the racketeering for years, and I learned shortly after this
incident that this is just one of several ways that Doherty and his thugs shakedown criminal
defendants to scare them into unfair plea deals for the prosecutors, judges, and other case fixers.
12. Shortly after this, I witnessed Matt shaking uncontrollably and he explained that he
takes medication for anxiety, but that his repeated requests to Doherty and the guards were
ignored; I helped Matt write a letter to jail administrator Larry Sykes, but it too was ignored and
Matt never received his medication the whole time he was in jail; recently, I made further
requests regarding Matt’s medication while requesting an appellate public defender for Matt, see

2
paragraph 104 in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and Exhibit MN-2001 attached,
but still to this day do not know if Matt is even receiving his medication.
13. On December 29th, Matt told me that when he was arrested, undersheriff Dave Tietz
told him that he would put some money on Matt’s commissary account if he would snitch on his
friends and others in Montgomery who Matt knew; another inmate stated that this happens a lot
in Le Sueur County.
14. Early on, I could tell that Matt loves his fiancé Bernadette very much and was looking
forward to becoming a father, but that Bernadette’s mom hated him and wanted to break them up
and so was secretly contacting Doherty, Moran, and Baxter to accomplish that end.
15. On January 3rd, 2012, Matt told me that his public defender Rick Lea, who was also
my public defender, was pressuring him before his hearing that day to “admit” that he was
guilty; and then during the hearing, Lea, prosecutor Kevin Moran, and judge M. Michael Baxter,
who was also the judge who fixed my case against me, were talking openly on the record and
hinting that a ‘fair’ deal for Matt would be 20 to 30 months in prison; I found out from other
victims Becker, Johnstone, Chadmore, Zeiher, Lundstrom, and Malheim, see paragraph 98 in
my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, that this is very common and that there are many
other ways that the public defenders, prosecutors, and judges scare criminal defendants into
accepting unfair plea deals that are designed to be at or near the maximum fines and
incarceration they could receive if found guilty of the charges.
16. On January 4th, Matt told me that his probation officer (name unknown) accused him
of all sorts of untrue stuff and told him that he would likely spend a year in jail and would have
to do a polygraph test as part of his ‘treatment’; I found out from other victims Johnstone,
McIntosh, Lundstrom, and Buchan that this is a very common case fixing tactic among
probation/parole agents with the Minnesota Department of Corrections and counselors and other
treatment specialists.
17. On January 30th, after discovering that Bernadette’s mom had repeatedly written ex
parte letters to Baxter to influence his decisions in Matt’s case, Matt wrote a letter to Baxter and
I explained to Matt that he should send a copy to Bernadette’s mom, which he did.
18. On February 5th, Baxter secretly ordered Sykes to separate Matt and me; and Matt
was transferred to a different cellblock.
19. Shortly before I was released on April 8th, Matt returned to my cellblock; he told me
that he had failed to return during a furlough and faced new escape charges (in case 12-370).
20. During our talks in the final days of my false imprisonment, Matt told me:
a. That he knows he made mistakes with his underage girlfriend and should be punished for
having sex with her, but that he was being punished much more severely than others with similar
charges;
b. That Doherty, Lea, Moran, and Baxter intimidated and hoodwinked him into an unfair plea
deal that classifies him with rapists, child molesters and other hardcore sex offenders, requires that
he attend ‘treatment’ sessions with sexual perverts, and includes up to 15 years of probation;
c. That he believes his stay of adjudication was wrongly revoked in case 11-228; that Moran
denied him due process and defrauded the court to obtain a quick sentence; that Baxter even said in
court on February 7th that he found it strange that they were proceeding straight to sentencing on

3
 that day; and that Baxter’s sentence of a year in jail seemed extremely harsh under the
circumstances;
d. That the case fixers also placed a “No Contact Order” on him not only preventing him from
contacting his fiancé but that will also prevent him from seeing or contacting his child once born;
e. That, when he was furloughed to attend one of the treatment sessions with sexual perverts,
he was extremely depressed and anxious due to the withholding of his anxiety medication, and
made another terrible decision to not return to the jail; but that, when he came to his senses a few
days later, he turned himself in; and
f. That his brother had also been framed by Le Sueur County officers of the court including
under a charge of “terrorist threat” against Bernadette’s older sister, which was also brought by
Bernadette’s mother and which resulted in an excessive sentence of 4 months in jail.
21. In July, Baxter sentenced Matt to a year in prison on the escape charge, which is
extremely excessive under the circumstances.
22. The traitors in Matt’s cases are Le Sueur Sheriff Thomas Doherty, Le Sueur County
prosecutor Kevin Moran, First Judicial District public defender Richard C. Lea, and First Judicial
District judge Baxter; all of whom are listed as ‘worst of the offenders’ in my main complaint.
23. Matt and his brother (Jeff Wolf) have relevant evidence and testimony to attest the
case fixing against their family in Le Sueur County.
THE MCINTOSH FAMILY:
24. George McIntosh Jr. is currently in prison.
25. I met George Jr. in the Le Sueur County Jail on February 11, 2012, and witnessed one
of the attempts by parole agents with the Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) to falsely
“violate” him, frame him, and re-incarcerate him, to keep the prisons full for federal funding.
26. George Jr. told me that:
a. He was originally framed as a “level 1” sex offender and sentenced to 30 months in prison;
b. He was put into a new program upon his release called “Intense Supervised Release” (ISR);
c. He has been repeatedly set up ever since;
d. Minnesota is an experimental state in a federal program to test “conditional release,” which
George likens to serving 2 sentences for the same crime;
e. He was placed in ISR Level 3 for 10 years, he has to call his ISR agent everyday, and he
cannot ever go on the Internet;
f. ISR agents had come to his work more than once in bulletproof vests;
g. ISR agents frame many ex-convicts and will stick to the same false facts even if caught in
their case fixing;
h. Department of Corrections attorneys assist in the framing and try to maximize the charges;
i. In his current case, coworkers were contacted to testify against him, and an agent took a
picture of an ax in his garage and claimed that George had it in the trunk of his car and had
threatened at work to use it to harm someone; but George was told at first that he could have no
witnesses or evidence for his defense;
j. He had been recently told by a therapist to not have sex in his car and that night was tailed
home by a prostitute who parked right behind him and flashed a light at him to join her in her car.
27. On February 28th, the DOC conducted a trial in the jail; George Jr. had a good state
public defender, and the judge dismissed the charges and released him that day.

4
 28. In May 2012, George Jr. was arrested again on false charges and sentenced to 3
months in prison.
29. His father, George McIntosh Sr., who has lived in Waterville for many years, told me
that George Jr. has been framed several times in Le Sueur County and he hopes higher
authorities will step in soon.
30. The traitors in George Jr.’s cases are mainly state employees with the DOC.
31. George Jr., George Sr., and others they know, have relevant evidence and testimony
to attest the case fixing against their family by the DOC.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 27th Day of August 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges
DEMANDS
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of the Muslof family, I demand:
a. The immediate transfer of their cases 1 to the Minnesota Supreme Court2;
b. Immediate protection of the Muslof family from further harm, full crime victim services,
one or more grand jury investigations and appointment of one or more special prosecutors;
c. Immediate arrest or summons of the suspects;
d. An order to Waseca County to immediately compensate the Muslof family in an amount
sufficient enough to get their home out of foreclosure, and then to pay their monthly mortgage bill
and all other living expenses until their family is restored, the mother is released from jail and is
back to work, and the family is able to maintain the payments;
e. Appropriate dockings of the Waseca Human Service offices, law enforcement, the courts,
and other local and state offices involved in the scandal, to recover the costs of remedying the
matters for the People of Waseca County and the State of Minnesota;
f. Appropriate terminations of employment, removals from office, banishments from our
government, disbarments and impeachments; and
g. Such other and further relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of the Crosby family, I demand:
a. The immediate transfer of Matt’s cases to the Minnesota Supreme Court;
b. Immediate protection of the Crosby family from further harm, full crime victim services,
one or more grand jury investigations and appointment of one or more special prosecutors;
c. Immediate arrest or summons of the suspects;
d. Appropriate dockings of Le Sueur County Sheriff’s Office, First Judicial District Courts,
and other local and state offices involved in the scandal, to recover the costs of prosecuting the
suspects for the People of Le Sueur County and the State of Minnesota;
e. Appropriate terminations of employment, removals from office, banishments from our
government, disbarments and impeachments; and
f. Such other and further relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.

1
Not available at the time of this writing; please call 507-461-3751 and obtain from either Jeff or Alexandra.
2
At least until the People of the Waseca County get their courts, human service offices and law enforcement back.

5
 WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of the McIntosh family, I demand:
a. The immediate transfer of George Jr.’s cases 3 to the Minnesota Supreme Court4;
b. Immediate protection of the McIntosh family from further harm, full crime victim services,
one or more grand jury investigations and appointment of one or more special prosecutors;
c. Immediate arrest or summons of the suspects;
d. Appropriate dockings of the Minnesota Department of Corrections and other local and state
offices involved in the scandal, to recover the costs of prosecuting the suspects for the People of Le
Sueur County and the State of Minnesota;
e. Appropriate terminations of employment, removals from office, banishments from our
government, disbarments and impeachments; and
f. Such other and further relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.

DATED this 27th Day of August 2012.

______________________________
By Affiant: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746
that, on this 28th Day of August 2012, to save on postage because I am indigent, I mailed two true
and correct copies of the foregoing First Addendum to Confidential Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver one copy directly to Minnesota Supreme Court Chief
Justice Lorie S. Gildea. Thank you.)
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver one copy directly to Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt
Zellers, in Office 463 of the State Office Building. Thank you.)

______________________________
By Affiant: John M. Hentges

3
Not available at the time of this writing; please call George Sr. at 507-362-8115.
4
At least until We the People of Le Sueur County get our criminal justice system back.

6
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

RITA COYLE DEMEULES,

Defendant.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
first supplemental criminal complaint, confidentially, against the above-named defendant for her
continued crimes against my family following my submittal of my “CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT” dated July 14, 2012, and state:
THIS FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Copy sent to Governor Dayton due to continued crimes by defendant; please hand-
deliver directly to Chief Justice Gildea. Thank you.)
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
 INTRODUCTION
1. This criminal complaint is VERY URGENT because it regards my DEMAND #2 in
my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, which must be fulfilled by July 31, 2012.
2. Two copies of this criminal complaint and the returned copy of my Affidavit and
Motion for Default Judgment are sent to the governor’s office because of the defendant’s
continued crimes. Governor Dayton: Please immediately hand-deliver the enclosed package
directly to Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. Thank-you.
3. In behalf of my family, I seek immediate adjudication by the Minnesota Supreme
Court of my Second Civil Complaint, sent with my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
immediate default judgment in my family’s favor and against the state of Minnesota, the
monetary relief due in the amount of $813,000.00, by July 31, 2012; and the immediate arrest
and removal from office of defendant Rita Coyle DeMeules.
4. This criminal complaint is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
AFFIDAVIT
5. I, victim and affiant JOHN M. HENTGES, am a citizen of the state of Minnesota,
Nicollet County, and presently reside at 603 N. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082; my five
children*, B.W.H., T.J.H., N.A.H., C.M.H., and A.N.H., presently reside in Jefferson County
Colorado. (*All of my children were minors when the crime spree in Minnesota began.)
6. Defendant RITA COYLES DEMEULES is currently the Commissioner of the
Minnesota Supreme Court, whose workplace is located at the Minnesota Judicial Center, 25 Rev.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55155.
7. Incorporated herein by reference, and to be adjudicated by the Supreme Court, are:
a. The records in Interstate Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement case 30-289499-44-1A;
b. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-FA-07-1253;
c. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786;
d. Minnesota Supreme Court case A08-1414
e. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A08-2079;
f. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-334;
g. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-390;
h. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-627;
i. Minnesota Supreme Court case A11-700;
j. My four PETITIONS1 TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA SUPREME COURTS
(my “PETITION BOOK”);
k. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-19;
l. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-794;
m. My First Civil Complaint and other pleadings in Minnesota Fifth Judicial District case 52-
CV-12-366; and my Second Civil Complaint and other pleadings submitted to the Minnesota Fifth
Judicial District Courts, but never filed2;
n. My CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012; and
1
PETITIONS FOR EN BANC REVIEW, PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (Colorado), PETITION
FOR RECONCILIATION AND CLOSURE OF TITLE IV-D CASE, and PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT (Minnesota), with 450 pages of documentary evidence proving most of the 189 denials of due process,
41 acts outside authority, 189 frauds upon the court, and 109 crimes, alleged therein, committed against my family,
any one of which required the appellate review and relief requested under Minn. R. Civ. P. Rule 60.

2
 o. My Affidavit and Motion for Default Judgment submitted to the Minnesota Supreme
Court, but returned by defendant DeMeules; see Exhibit MN-1005.
8. Prior to DeMeules’ appointment as commissioner, Commissioner Richard S. Slowes
and Assistant Commissioner Joanne H. Turner had committed several crimes against my family
by returning most of my petitions and evidence for my PETITION BOOK and my follow up
pleadings. They caused significant harm to my family and should be fired if still employed by
the state and brought up on the appropriate charges once the first grand jury is convened.
9. During my unlawful detention by the case fixers in case 09-786 earlier this year, see
paragraph 25 in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, defendant DeMeules committed
multiple crimes against my family to obstruct the administration of justice for the case fixers:
CRIMES #1-3:
10. On December 29, 2011, DeMueles sent my Ex Parte Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus3 and Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis back to me at the jail with a fraudulent
cover letter; see Exhibit MN-1001.
11. DeMeules knew from my habeas corpus pleading:
a. That I had ample grounds, and evidence at the Supreme Court in my PETITION BOOK
and other previous pleadings, justifying my release, including the proven facts that my child
support was paid-in-full, that several case fixing crimes had been committed against me, and that
the case fixers were unlawfully detaining me because of my evidence of their crimes;
b. That the district court officials were again denying my rights to counsel and/or to represent
myself; and
c. That the supreme court was required to accept original jurisdiction for my habeas corpus
proceeding due to the extraordinary circumstances of the case.
12. DeMeules also knew from my cover letter to the appellate clerks (see page 2 of
Exhibit MN-1001):
a. That the case fixers had caused enormous harm to my five children and me; and
b. That her rejection of my pleadings would cause further harm to my family.
13. But, despite her knowledge of all this and in spite of actually recognizing in her cover
letter my right to petition the supreme court for a writ of habeas corpus, DeMeules un-filed my
pleadings and returned them to me to be filed in the known corrupt and illegitimate district court.
14. By un-filing and returning my pleadings, at the very least DeMeules committed a
Minnesota crime:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority
or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the
other’s person, property, or rights; or
2
All of which were submitted to the Minnesota Supreme Court in the same package as my CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012.
3
My pleadings to the Supreme Court, see paragraph 25 in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, will be
sent once special original jurisdiction is established for cases 07-1253 and 09-786 and for my family’s cases.

3
Or, more accurately DeMeules committed a very serious federal crime:
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
18 U.S.C. § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant
(c) Whoever corruptly--
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
15. By denying my right to original jurisdiction at the supreme court for my habeas
corpus proceeding, at the very least DeMeules committed another Minnesota crime:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of
office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
Or, more accurately DeMeules committed a federal crime:
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS.
18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
(c) Whoever, under color of any law … willfully subjects any person in any State … to the deprivation of
any rights … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both
16. By making false statements and citing irrelevant case law in her cover letter, at the
very least DeMeules committed another Minnesota crime:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like
document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
CRIMES #4-5:
17. On January 3, 2012, I sent my Ex Parte Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis back to the appellate clerks with my Ex Parte Petition
for Placement in Witness Protection, and included a cover letter which had a special note to
the Commissioners; see Exhibit MN-1002.
18. At this point, Minnesota Court of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson had
intercepted my Ex Parte Emergency Petition for Reversal of Bail Order to the Supreme Court
dated December 27, 2011; and had established Appeal #A12-19; Johnson continued to intercept
most of my early pleadings to the Supreme Court, see paragraph 63 in my CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, and then dismissed them all on a technicality and ordered the appellate
clerk to inform the case fixers about my ex parte pleadings and to deny my access to the
appellate courts for any document that I was not willing to share with the case fixers; Johnson’s
crimes will be alleged in a separate criminal complaint; on information and belief, Johnson and
DeMeules conspired on their crimes to help the case fixers.
19. DeMeules knew from my cover letter of January 3, 2012:
a. That my five children and I are victims of several very serious crimes;
b. That the First Judicial District Court in Le Sueur County is very corrupt;

4
 c. That the corrupt district court officials were not going to help me with anything because of
my evidence of their case fixing in my PETITION BOOK, which was on the record at the Supreme
Court; and
d. That she should point out to the justices that probable cause of several crimes against my
family was already proven on the record at the Supreme Court.
20. By failing to report the crime spree against my family to the justices and other
appropriate authorities, at the very least DeMeules committed one or more Minnesota crimes:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(2) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of
office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law [DeMeules is also a
“Mandatory Reporter” under Minnesota law]; or
609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS OR ARREST.
(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or
apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense.
Or, DeMeules committed a federal crime:
CHAPTER 1 - 18 U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony … and does not as soon as possible
make known to some judge or other person in civil or military authority … shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
21. By allowing Johnson to intercept my pleadings intended for the Supreme Court, at the
very least DeMeules committed further counts under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.43 and 609.50, and
under 18 U.S.C. § 4.
CRIMES #6-7:
22. On January 13, 2012, when the district court began un-filing and returning my
pleadings to me at the jail, I sent my Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim in case 09-786 to the
appellate clerks and asked them to file and forward the pleadings with my PETITION BOOK and,
anticipating more criminal misconduct by Johnson, Court of Appeals case #A12-19, to the
Supreme Court for adjudication; see page 2 in Exhibit MN-1002.
23. These pleadings were kept by Johnson or DeMeules, which constitutes theft:
609.52 THEFT. Subd. 2. Acts constituting theft
(1) intentionally and without claim of right takes, uses, transfers, conceals or retains possession of
movable property of another without the other’s consent and with intent to deprive the owner
permanently of possession of the property …
Subd. 3. Sentence
(2) to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or
both, if the value of the property or services stolen exceeds $5,000 …
24. Johnson and DeMeules both knew from these pleadings:
a. That the crime spree in Le Sueur County was out-of-control;
b. That the case fixers were holding me hostage because of my evidence of their case fixing;
c. That the evidence attached to my PETITION BOOK proved most of my allegations in my
Counterclaim and Motion to Dismiss, including the fact that my child support obligations are
paid-in-full, and provided many grounds to dismiss case 09-786 and the charge of ‘nonsupport’ of

5
 my kids; to justify declarations of nullity of all decisions in both cases including the jury verdict; to
warrant the summoning of one or more grand juries, the appointment of one or more special
prosecutors, and indictments against the officers of the court; and to justify the damages prayed for
in the Counterclaim; and
d. That the district court was rejecting all my pleadings to keep the truth off the record in 09-
786, was again denying me counsel, and was refusing to escort me to the courthouse so that I could
file documents and properly represent myself.
25. By failing to report the continued crime spree by the district court officers, at the very
least DeMeules committed another count of:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(3) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of
office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS OR ARREST.
(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or
apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense.
Or, DeMeules committed another count of:
CHAPTER 1 - 18 U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony … and does not as soon as possible
make known to some judge or other person in civil or military authority … shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
CRIMES #8-47:
26. In late January 2012, it was clear that Johnson would fix Appeal #A12-19 like he had
all my previous appeals; and so I sent all further pleadings directly to, and captioned under the
heading of, the Minnesota Supreme Court:
a. Petition for Special Jurisdiction and Venue, dated January 16, 2012;
b. Ex Parte Petition for Initial Arrest Warrants, dated January 24, 2012;
c. Emergency Petition to Reverse Administrative Decision, dated January 24, 2012;
d. Emergency Ex Parte Petition for Several Orders, dated January 30, 2012;
e. Petition for Adjudication of All Claims, dated February 8, 2012;
f. Ex Parte Petition for Change of Venue and Other Orders, dated February 17, 2012;
g. Notice of Appeal - Statement of the Case (in case 09-786), dated February 20, 2012;
h. Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dated March 19, 2012;
And, the pleadings rejected by the district court, pending Special Jurisdiction And Venue:
i. 16 Combined Civil and Criminal Complaints and Summonses against Baxter, Sykes,
Doherty, Perkins, Christian, Zehnder Fischer, Morgan, Lynch, Kopet, Lyndgaard, Collins, Lea,
O’Connor, Holmgren, Stuart, and Kelly, dated December 22 2011 to January 14 2012;
j. 18 copies of the Verified Complaint and Summonses against the state of Minnesota and
Baxter, Sykes, Doherty, Perkins, Christian, Zehnder Fischer, Morgan, Lynch, Kopet, Lyndgaard,
Collins, Lea, O’Connor, Holmgren, Stuart, and Kelly, dated February 1 2012;
k. Motion for Recusals, Disqualifications, and Stay of Proceedings, dated Jan. 19, 2012;
l. Motion to Modify Sentencing Order, dated February 10 2012;
m. Motion for Copy of Confidential Report, dated February 10 2012;
n. Motion for Default Judgment in Counterclaim, dated February 20 2012;
o. Motion for Stay and Release Pending Appeal, dated March 7, 2012;

6
 27. At great expense of time and money, I hand-wrote and mailed all of the foregoing
pleadings to the appellate clerks with cover letters, see Exhibit MN-1003, and later with letters
to DeMeules and chief justice Gildea, explaining that the Supreme Court would have to establish
original jurisdiction and exercise its supervisory powers due to the ongoing case fixing by the
officers of the First Judicial District Courts and by Court of Appeals chief judge Johnson.
28. DeMeules knew how serious the matters were from my cover letters to the clerks,
from the pleadings themselves, and from my letters to her; see page 1 in Exhibit MN-1002 and
pages 8-9 and pages 13-14 in Exhibit MN-1003.
29. On information and belief, DeMeules prevented chief justice Gildea from receiving
my pleadings to the Supreme Court and my letters to the justice; see page 7 and pages 11-12 in
Exhibit MN-1003.
30. At great expense to my family and to the People of State of Minnesota, DeMeules
returned all of the foregoing pleadings to me at the jail with cover letters, see Exhibit MN-1004,
proving several more blatant crimes to assist the case fixers in their crimes and to avoid the
charges they deserved.
31. By un-filing and returning these pleadings, DeMeules committed at least 5 more
counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43 and/or 5 counts under 18 U.S.C. §
1512.
32. By denying my right to original jurisdiction at the supreme court for my pleadings
listed in paragraph 26 above, DeMeules committed at least 15 more counts of criminal
misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43 and/or 15 counts under 18 U.S.C. § 242.
33. By making false statements and citing irrelevant case law in her cover letters,
DeMeules committed at least 5 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43.
34. By failing to report to the justices and other appropriate authorities the ongoing crime
spree against my family alleged in my pleadings and letters to her, DeMeules committed at least
15 further counts under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.43 and 609.50, and/or 15 counts under 18 U.S.C. § 4.
CRIMES #48-55:
35. On July 24, 2012, DeMeules returned my Affidavit and Motion for Default
Judgment along with a cover letter, see Exhibit MN-1005, referencing the affidavit and
“Documents received July, 2012” and stating that “the supreme court will not act on any of the
papers you have submitted recently.”
36. By returning my affidavit, DeMeules committed another count of criminal
misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43 and/or under 18 U.S.C. § 1512.
37. By keeping or concealing my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, DeMeules
committed another count of theft under Minn. Stat. § 609.52.
38. By denying my right to original jurisdiction at the supreme court for my
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and other recent pleadings, DeMeules committed at
least 3 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43 and/or 3 counts under 18
U.S.C. § 242.
39. By making false statements in her cover letter, DeMeules committed another count of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43.

7
 40. By failing to report the current crime spree, now in Nicollet County, to the justices
and other appropriate authorities, DeMeules committed further counts under Minn. Stat. §§
609.43 and 609.50, and/or under 18 U.S.C. § 4.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 27th Day of July 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
41. Under the circumstances detailed in the foregoing Affidavit, all of my previous
requests and assertions of rights in behalf of my family are now demands:
DEMAND #1: Immediate Relief Demanded in my Second Civil Complaint:
42. As direct and proximate results of DeMeules’ most recent crime in returning my
Affidavit and Motion for Default Judgment, my five children and I have suffered significant
further damages and we will continue to suffer until her crime spree ends and we receive the
relief demanded in the second civil complaint regarding our “housing crisis,” our “income
crisis,” and our protection, other crime victim services, and heightened witness protection-like
services.
43. Once original jurisdiction is established for my family’s cases at the Minnesota
Supreme Court, I will be filing a civil action against DeMeules and others involved in the denials
of my access to the district and appellate courts for the adjudication of my Second Civil
Complaint, to recover damages and interest not only for the recent matter but also for refusing
to process my Counterclaim in case 09-786.
44. If, due to DeMueles’ recent crimes, the state is unable to compensate us in the amount
of $813,000.00 by July 31, 2012, as demanded in my second complaint, I demand an additional
order to DeMeules to compensate us for interest in the amount of $133.64 per day4 until I receive
the $813,000.00.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand immediate
adjudication (by July 31, 2012) of my Second Civil Complaint, including default judgment in
my favor; an immediate court award in the amount of $750,000.00 so that I can obtain suitable
housing for my family in Nicollet County; an immediate order to the state of Minnesota to
compensate me each month in the amount of $21,000.00 beginning June 1 2012, starting with an
4
$813,000.00 @ 6% statutory interest = $133.64 per day.

8
initial payment (by July 31, 2012) in the amount of $63,000.00 for June, July and August 2012;
in the event the state is unable to compensate us by July 31, 2012, due to DeMeules’ recent
crimes, an order requiring defendant Rita Coyle DeMeules to individually compensate me for
interest on the $813,000.00 in the amount of $133.64 per day until I receive the money; an order
to the state of Minnesota to arrange and pay for all crime victim services for my family and
witness protection-like services, as needed, including 24/7 bodyguards; an order to the state of
Minnesota to reimburse the citizens of Nicollet County and the Fifth Judicial District for any
services provided to my family; and appropriate punitive damages and such other and further sua
sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #2: Immediate Arrest of Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules:
45. Because probable cause is established for one or more of DeMeules’ crimes by this
complaint and my previous pleadings, my children and I are entitled to her immediate arrest or
summons.
46. On information and belief, the severity of DeMeules’ crime spree justifies her arrest.
47. Until the first grand jury is summoned, an appellate judge or justice will need to find
probable cause of one or more of DeMeules’ crimes.
48. Pursuant to Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 3, DeMeules’ arrest or summons is required.
49. Once the first grand jury is summoned, I demand further investigation into all of
DeMeules’ crimes against my family and others, and I press full charges against DeMeules for
all crimes alleged in this complaint and for any additional state or federal crimes found by the
grand jury.
50. In addition, I demand all further crime victim services for my family including:
a. Protection from further harm;
b. Crime victim reparations during the pendency of the criminal case;
c. Prosecution to the fullest extent of the law;
d. Full and timely restitution;
e. Appropriate fines and imprisonment; and
f. All other rights of crime victims pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 611A.01 to 611A.06.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand an immediate
finding of probable cause of one or more of DeMeules’ crimes, an immediate order for
DeMeules’ arrest or summons, an immediate order summoning a grand jury; and an order to the
grand jury to investigate and charge DeMeules’ for all crimes alleged in this complaint and for
any additional state or federal crimes found by the grand jury; together with such other and
further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #3: Removal from Office, Termination of Employment, Disbarment, Impeachment,
and Banishment from Our Government:
51. DeMeules apparently has the power as a commissioner to fix cases, as she did in my
family’s cases, to obstruct justice, as she did repeatedly in conspiracy with Court of Appeals
chief judge Johnson and others, and to neglect her duties, as she did to assist the case fixers.
52. She should be removed from office, fired and banned from ever holding another
government position, disbarred if licensed to practice law, and impeached if a judge.

9
 WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand DeMeules’
removal from office, termination of employment, banishment from our government, disbarment
if licensed to practice law, and impeachment if a judge; together with such other and further sua
sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
IN CONCLUSION:
53. It is absolutely mind-boggling to me to see such blatant, out in the open, out-of-
control, in broad-daylight, in my face crimes being committed against my family, with impunity,
at this level of our state and local governments; and no one will do a thing.
54. My mind is swimming with questions: How many crimes do I have to prove to get
help for my devastated, suffering family? Does anyone care that my five children have not seen
me for over 5 years, have not talked to me for nearly 4 years, and are now being prevented under
court order by the case fixing criminals from seeing me or talking to me? Does anyone else see
that the crime spree will end as soon as someone finds the proven fact that my child support
obligations are paid-in-full, which is the very first form of relief due pursuant to my First Civil
Complaint? Can anyone at least help my family get away from the criminals and protect us from
further harm?
55. This complaint only covers a very small portion of the crime spree; it’s enormous, it’s
out-of-control, and it’s way over my head.
56. This month, at least four more police officers, now in my hometown of St. Peter,
obviously finding out that I have proof of law enforcement’s participation in the racketeering,
conspired and brought at least six new charges against me. They’ve gone mad! I was falsely
arrested and imprisoned again last Monday, for the 8th time! And, I just heard yesterday about
another false warrant for my arrest! Please help my family!
57. Due to recent events that will be alleged in the next supplemental criminal complaint,
I will now be demanding 24/7 bodyguards as soon as I obtain suitable housing for my family in
Nicollet County.
58. You, our leaders, know that criminal factions exist in many of our local, state, and
federal government offices, have incrementally overthrown the United States, and are now taking
control of our local and state governments; please seize the opportunity to take back our state
for the People of the State of Minnesota.
DATED this 27th Day of July 2012. ______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
603 N. Minnesota Ave.
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

10
 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 27th Day of July 2012, I mailed two true and correct copies of the
foregoing First Supplemental Criminal Complaint and the returned copy of my Affidavit and
Motion for Default Judgment, to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver the enclosed package, which contains one copy of the
complaint and the returned copy of the affidavit and motion, directly to Minnesota Supreme
Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. Thank you.)
And, I mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing First Supplemental Criminal
Complaint to:
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

11
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. FIRST ADDENDUM
TO FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

RITA COYLE DEMEULES,

Defendant.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
first addendum to my FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 27, 2012,
confidentially1, against the above-named defendant for her continued crimes against my family,
and state:
THIS FIRST ADDENDUM IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
NOTICE TO THE OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE CLERK: Please file this criminal complaint, and my
previous criminal complaints, and hand-deliver them directly to Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. DO NOT provide
copies of any of my family’s pleadings, or allow access to our files, to Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules, Court
of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson, or any other official, without my permission.

1
 AFFIDAVIT
1. On August 30, 2012, I called all four Minnesota leaders named above to follow up on
my criminal complaints to date.
2. I left messages for each leader to return my call and answer the following questions:
a. Do you have the copies I sent you of my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and my
FIRST, SECOND and THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINTS ?
b. What crime victim services have been initiated for my family?
c. Who will be providing me with a “Clearance Letter” so I can obtain a driver’s license?
d. And, what should I do next?
3. One of Chief Justice Gildea’s judicial assistants:
a. Wrote down each question;
b. Noted that appellate personnel have prevented the chief justice from receiving my materials
in the past;
c. Noted that my five children and I are victims of many crimes and have been separated from
each other for over 5 years;
d. Told me that she did not know if Chief Justice Gildea had received my criminal complaints,
but that she did not believe the chief justice could get involved in individual cases anyway;
e. Learned that commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules is involved in the case fixing and is the
subject of my first supplemental criminal complaint;
f. Learned that I am requesting that the supreme court establish original jurisdiction for my
family’s civil and criminal complaints, at least until the First and Fifth Judicial Districts are taken
back from the case fixers and returned to the People; and
g. Learned that Chief Justice Gildea has duties to my family under the circumstances and
must take control of the situation.
4. No one responded.
5. On September 6, 2012, I called the four leaders again to follow up and left messages
for each; and the same judicial assistant to Chief Justice Gildea:
a. Told me that she had passed my messages and information on August 30 th along to Chief
Justice Gildea and commissioner DeMeules;
b. Knew I was very upset and learned again that commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules had
committed several crimes against my family and is the subject of my first supplemental criminal
complaint; and
c. Told me that she would have the chief justice’s administrative assistant, “Ginger,” contact
me the next day to schedule a telephone call with Chief Justice Gildea.
6. No one responded.
7. Later that day, defendant DeMeules wrote to me, see Exhibit MN-2002, to decline all
crime victim services and any other help for my suffering family by the Supreme Court or by
Chief Justice Gildea.
8. DeMeules’ letter evidences many things including:
a. That she is again intercepting my pleadings to the Supreme Court;
b. That she is again preventing the filing of my pleadings;
c. That she is again preventing Chief Justice Gildea and the other justices from receiving my
pleadings and fulfilling their obligations, as judges, to my family and to the People of the State of
Minnesota under Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 2.01, subd. 4; Rule 3.01; Rule 18; under other Minnesota

2
 rules, laws, and constitutional provisions; and under federal rules, laws, and constitutional
provisions;
d. That she has read my confidential criminal complaints;
e. That she knows I am sending my civil and criminal complaints to the Supreme Court due to
the case fixing and denials of access to the courts in the First and Fifth Judicial Districts;
f. That she knows that my five children and I are crime victims and are being denied crime
victim services and other services by the lower courts and by local law enforcement;
g. That she knows that one or more officials at the Minnesota Attorney General’s office and
other state executive offices are involved in the case fixing and have refused to intervene, secure
crime victim services for my family, reinstate my driver’s license, simply find administratively that
my child support obligations are paid-in-full, or anything else that would end the crime spree,
which would show that I was right all along or expose their criminal racketeering enterprises;
h. That, despite my allegations and evidence sent with my FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT proving her 55 previous crimes against my family, she is still employed
by the state of Minnesota and has not been arrested;
i. That, despite knowing that her predecessors prevented Chief Justice Gildea from seeing 3
of the 4 petitions and the 450 pages of documentary evidence in my PETITION BOOK and conned
her into thinking that I was trying to bypass the district courts when she entered her order in A11-
700, used the void order again as an excuse to deny me access to the Supreme Court;
j. That, despite knowing the Supreme Court has ‘supervisory jurisdiction over the courts of
the state’2 and is obligated to intervene and take full control in a situation like this, she made several
false statements about the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction and authority, and stated on behalf of Chief
Justice Gildea and the entire Supreme Court that, “neither the Chief Justice nor the Minnesota
Supreme Court will act on your criminal complaints, nor otherwise respond to your requests for
assistance … Neither the Chief Justice nor the court as a whole can act independently to intervene
in matters based on correspondence or verbal requests such as yours”; and
k. That, despite knowing that, as a crime victim, I can verbally complain or submit my
criminal complaints on a leaf or a piece of bark to any judge in the state, she stated on behalf of
Chief Justice Gildea and the entire Supreme Court that, “no further responses to your inquiries will
be provided, and filings submitted that do not conform to the rules of appellate procedure will be
returned to you.”
CRIMES #56-68:
9. In addition to the 55 crimes alleged and proven in my FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, DeMeules committed the following further crimes:
a. By intercepting my criminal complaints intended for the Supreme Court and not returning
them as stated in her letter, DeMeules committed another theft pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.52,
subd. 2(1);
b. By preventing the filing of my criminal complaints, DeMeules committed another act of
criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2);
c. By preventing Chief Justice Gildea and the other justices from receiving my pleadings and
fulfilling their obligations, which she has done repeatedly to damage my cases and to prevent the
lawful execution of legal processes, both civil and criminal, including the apprehension of the other
case fixing criminals, DeMeules committed another act of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn.
Stat. § 609.43(3) and the crime of obstruction of legal process pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.50(1);
d. By reading my confidential criminal complaints knowing that she is also a suspect,
DeMeules committed another act of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2);
e. By allowing and participating in the continued harassment and oppression by the case

2
Pursuant to the “Case Dispositional Procedures of the Minnesota Supreme Court,” revised January 2011.

3
 fixers, DeMeules committed another count under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1);
f. By denying my access to the appellate courts, DeMeules committed another act of criminal
misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2);
g. By denying my family crime victim services and other assistance by the Supreme Court,
DeMeules committed at least 2 more counts of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. §
609.43(2);
h. By intentionally failing to report the crimes committed by her predecessors and others to
prevent Chief Justice Gildea and the other justices from seeing 3 of the 4 petitions and the 450
pages of documentary evidence in my PETITION BOOK, DeMeules committed another act of
criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1)
i. By writing another fraudulent letter in her capacity as commissioner of the Supreme Court,
DeMeules committed another act of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4); and
j. By continuing to associate with the case fixing criminals and by knowingly participating in
their continued pattern of criminal racketeering activities, DeMeules committed at least 2 more
counts of racketeering under Minn. Stat. § 609.903.
10. DeMeules is also complicit in every other crime alleged in my other criminal
complaints that she knows about, but I will wait to present those directly to the first grand jury
once established.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 19th Day of September 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
DEMANDS: Immediate Arrest and Fulfillment of Previous Demands:
11. Because evidence establishing probable cause of several of DeMeules’s crimes was
attached to my FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, she should have already been
arrested.
12. Because you, Minnesota’s highest authorities, now know for a fact that my five
children and I are victims of several very serious crimes, all of my previous demands in my
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT should have already been fulfilled.
13. Your negligence in protecting my family can mean only one thing.
14. If by September 30, 2012, DeMeules is not arrested, or any of my other demands in
my criminal complaints are not fulfilled, I will assume that you, Minnesota’s highest authorities,

4
and/or your offices, are involved or are willfully neglecting your duties.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, as a citizen of the state of Minnesota and as a
crime victim, and having provided ample evidence establishing probable cause of one or more
crimes against my family by the defendant, I DEMAND the immediate arrest of Rita Coyle
DeMeules and fulfillment of all of my other demands in my criminal complaints to date3 no later
than September 30, 2012.

DATED this 19th Day of September 2012.

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 19th Day of September 2012, I mailed true and correct copies of the
foregoing First Addendum to First Supplemental Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Office of the Appellate Clerk
FOR: Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
305 Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

3
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 14, 2012;
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 27, 2012;
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 23, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 28, 2012.

5
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

M. MICHAEL BAXTER,
MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER,
JULIA KRAEMER,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
second supplemental criminal complaint, confidentially, against the above-named defendants for
their continued crimes against my family following my submittal of my “CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT” dated July 14, 2012, and state:
THIS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
 INTRODUCTION
1. This criminal complaint seeks to end the crime spree by the defendants in First
Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786.
2. These defendants are among the “worst of the offenders” named in paragraph 97 on
page 18 of my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.
3. In conspiracy with law enforcement in Nicollet County, they caused my 7th false
arrest in case 09-786 on July 2, 2012, brought about the further false charges in Fifth Judicial
District case 52-CR-12-278 and caused my 8th false arrest in that case on July 21, 2012, and are
currently working together and with the case fixers in Nicollet County to cover up their crimes.
4. This criminal complaint is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
AFFIDAVIT
5. I, victim and affiant JOHN M. HENTGES, am a citizen of the state of Minnesota,
Nicollet County, and presently reside at 603 N. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082; my five
children*, B.W.H., T.J.H., N.A.H., C.M.H., and A.N.H., presently reside in Jefferson County
Colorado. (*All of my children were minors when the crime spree in Minnesota began.)
6. Defendant M. MICHAEL BAXTER is currently a First Judicial District judge in Le
Sueur County, whose workplace is located at 88 S. Park Ave., Le Center, MN 56057.
7. Defendant MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER is currently the Nicollet County
Attorney (in the Fifth Judicial District), who is still acting as the prosecutor in First Judicial
District case 09-786, whose workplace is located at 326 S. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082.
8. Defendant JULIA KRAEMER is currently a Probation/Parole Agent with the
Minnesota Department of Corrections1, whose workplace is located at 22-½ S. Lexington, Le
Center, MN 56057.
9. Incorporated herein by reference, and to be adjudicated by the Supreme Court, are:
a. The records in Interstate Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement case 30-289499-44-1A;
b. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-FA-07-1253;
c. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786;
d. Minnesota Supreme Court case A08-1414
e. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A08-2079;
f. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-334;
g. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-390;
h. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-627;
i. Minnesota Supreme Court case A11-700;
j. My four PETITIONS2 TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA SUPREME COURTS
1
There is definitely a criminal faction within this department, which is training and encouraging agents to falsely
“violate” their clients to keep the jails and prisons full for federal funding and to extort cash from the falsely accused
for the racketeers. At the ‘end of the day,’ when the case fixing is exposed and billions in damages are awarded to
victims and criminal penalties have been assessed on the case fixers, this department and many other corrupt state
offices should be drastically downsized and many worthless local and state employees should be fired.
2
PETITIONS FOR EN BANC REVIEW, PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (Colorado), PETITION
FOR RECONCILIATION AND CLOSURE OF TITLE IV-D CASE, and PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT (Minnesota), with 450 pages of documentary evidence proving most of the 189 denials of due process,
41 acts outside authority, 189 frauds upon the court, and 109 crimes, alleged therein, committed against my family,

2
 (my “PETITION BOOK”);
k. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-19;
l. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-794;
m. My First Civil Complaint and other pleadings in Minnesota Fifth Judicial District case 52-
CV-12-366; and my Second Civil Complaint and other pleadings submitted to the Minnesota Fifth
Judicial District Courts, but never filed3;
n. My CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012; and
o. My FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 27, 2012.
10. Judge Baxter and prosecutor Zehnder Fischer, who both knew all along that my child
support obligations are paid-in-full, carried out4 many of the crimes committed in case 09-786 to
frame me as a “Deadbeat Dad” and to obtain the false conviction for ‘nonsupport’ of my kids.
11. Their crimes through February 2011 are alleged in my PETITION BOOK and the
evidence attached proves many of the crimes, in addition to probable cause.
CRIMES #1-337:
12. Of the 189 denials of due process (DODP), 41 acts outside authority (AOA), 189
frauds upon the court (FUTC), and other crimes (CR), alleged in my PETITION BOOK, Baxter
committed 2395 crimes and Zehnder Fischer committed 986 crimes, which are 337 of the 528
crimes alleged therein.
13. Many of the denials of due process and other omissions, acts outside authority, and
other crimes were violations of Minn. Stat. § 609.43:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically
provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of
not more than $3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of
office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority
or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the
other’s person, property, or rights; or
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like
document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
14. Many of Baxter and Zehnder Fischer’s materially false statements were common law
frauds upon the court.
15. Baxter and Zehnder Fischer also committed the following Minnesota crimes:

any one of which required the appellate review and relief requested under Minn. R. Civ. P. Rule 60.
3
All of which were submitted to the Minnesota Supreme Court in the same package as my CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012.
4
I now believe the case fixing is masterminded and orchestrated by First Judicial District chief judge Edward I.
Lynch; his crimes will be alleged in a separated complaint, if necessary.
5
DODP #33, 75, 77-79, 83, 90, 97, 99-104, 106-110, 112-115, 118-122, 124-127, 134-145, 153-155, 157, 160-
183, 185, and 187-188; AOA #9-13, 17-23, 25-27, 29, and 32-40; FUTC #40-43, 70, 72-78, 80-81, 85-126, 129-152,
157, 160, 161-167, and 177-184; CR #44, 45, 47, 53-60, 63, 65, 67-70, 79-85, 88-89, 92-106, and 109.
6
DODP #74, 77, 91, 105, 111, 126-133, 158-159, 165, 167-169, 174-176, 181-183, and 186; AOA #24, 28, 34-36,
and 41; FUTC #39, 47-69, 71, 79, 82, 127-128, 153-157, and 168-176; CR #53-54, 56-58, 59, 64, 70-71, 79, 86-87,
92, 94, and 96-104.

3
609.05 LIABILITY FOR CRIMES OF ANOTHER. Subdivision 1. Aiding, abetting; liability.
A person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises,
hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.
609.17 ATTEMPTS. Subdivision 1. Crime defined.
Whoever, with the intent to commit a crime, does an act which is a substantial step toward, and more than
preparation for, the commission of the crime is guilty of an attempt to commit that crime...
609.175 CONSPIRACY. Subdivision 1. To cause arrest or prosecution.
Whoever conspires with another to cause a third person to be arrested or prosecuted on a criminal charge
knowing the charge to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
609.27 COERCION. Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever orally or in writing makes any of the following threats and thereby causes another against the
other's will to do any act or forbear doing a lawful act is guilty of coercion and may be sentenced as
provided in subdivision 2:
(1) a threat to unlawfully inflict bodily harm upon, or hold in confinement, the person threatened or
another, when robbery or attempt to rob is not committed thereby; or
(2) a threat to unlawfully inflict damage to the property of the person threatened or another; or
(3) a threat to unlawfully injure a trade, business, profession, or calling; or
(4) a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose
any person to disgrace or ridicule; or
(5) a threat to make or cause to be made a criminal charge, whether true or false; provided, that a
warning of the consequences of a future violation of law given in good faith by a peace officer or
prosecuting attorney to any person shall not be deemed a threat for the purposes of this section.
609.275 ATTEMPT TO COERCE.
Whoever makes a threat within the meaning of section 609.27, subdivision 1, clauses, (1) to (5), but fails
to cause the intended act or forbearance, commits an attempt to coerce and may be punished as provided
in section 609.17.
609.48 PERJURY.
Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is
guilty of perjury and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4:
(1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or
authorized by law to be made under oath or affirmation; or
(2) in any writing which is required or authorized by law to be under oath or affirmation; or
(3) in any other case in which the penalties for perjury are imposed by law and no specific sentence is
otherwise provided.
609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS OR ARREST.
(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or
apprehension of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense.
609.515 MISCONDUCT OF JUDICIAL OR HEARING OFFICER.
Whoever does any of the following…is guilty of a misdemeanor:
(1) Being a judicial or hearing officer, does either of the following:
(a) agrees with or promises another to determine a cause or controversy or issue pending or to be
brought before the officer for or against any party; or
(b) intentionally obtains or receives and uses information relating thereto contrary to the regular
course of the proceeding.
(2) Induces a judicial or hearing officer to act contrary to the provisions of this section.
609.7475 FRAUDULENT OR OTHERWISE IMPROPER FINANCING STATEMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
As used in this section, "record" has the meaning given in section 336.9-102.
Subd. 2. Crime described.
A person who:

4
 (2) presents for filing or causes to be presented for filing a record with the intent that it be used to
harass or defraud any other person;
is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 3.
609.749 HARASSMENT; STALKING; PENALTIES.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
As used in this section, "harass" means to engage in intentional conduct which:
(1) the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel
frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated; and
(2) causes this reaction on the part of the victim.
Subd. 1a. No proof of specific intent required.
In a prosecution under this section, the state is not required to prove that the actor intended to cause the
victim to feel frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated, or except as otherwise
provided in subdivision 3, paragraph (a), clause (4), or paragraph (b), that the actor intended to cause any
other result.
Subd. 2. Harassment and stalking crimes.
(a) A person who harasses another by committing any of the following acts is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor:
(1) directly or indirectly manifests a purpose or intent to injure the person, property, or rights of
another by the commission of an unlawful act.
609.765 CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
Defamatory matter is anything which exposes a person or a group, class or association to hatred,
contempt, ridicule, degradation or disgrace in society, or injury to business or occupation.
Subd. 2. Acts constituting.
Whoever with knowledge of its defamatory character orally, in writing or by any other means,
communicates any defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed is
guilty of criminal defamation and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to
payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
609.903 RACKETEERING.
Subdivision 1. Crime.
A person is guilty of racketeering if the person:
(1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise [or governmental entity] and intentionally
conducts or participates in the affairs of the enterprises by participating in a pattern of criminal
activity;
Penalty.
A person convicted of violating section 609.903 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 20
years or to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both.
16. Baxter and Zehnder Fischer also committed several federal crimes7 including 3 or
more counts of a Class B federal felony:
18 U.S.C. § 514 - Fictitious obligations:
(a) Whoever, with the intent to defraud – (1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise
makes, or attempts or causes the same, within the United States; (2) passes, utters, presents, offers,
7
I submitted six criminal complaints with 729 pages of documentary evidence to U.S. Attorney B. Todd Jones and
United States District Court Chief Judge Michael J. Davis, but they and many other federal officials in Minnesota
not only know about but also are involved in the racketeering and may be the driving force. It was the treasonous
actions and inactions of these federal employees that led me to research and understand the hierarchy of the New
World Order (NWO), the ranks and roles of the traitors, their takeover plans for the United States, and their case
fixing tactics to takeover the states including Minnesota. On information and belief, the NWO steals from us through
the Federal Reserve and uses our own money to payoff federal judges and other federal officials, who payoff state
judges and other state and local officials, who payoff local law enforcement and other thugs to get the population
readied for martial law and their police state.

5
 brokers, issues, sells, or attempts or causes the same, or with like intent possesses, within the United
States; or (3) utilizes interstate or foreign commerce, including use of the mails or wire, radio, or other
electronic communication, to transmit, transport, ship, move, transfer, or attempts or causes the same, to,
from, or through the United States, any false or fictitious instrument, document, or other item appearing,
representing, purporting, or contriving through scheme or artifice, to be an actual security or other
financial instrument issued under the authority of the United States, a foreign government, a State or
other political subdivision of the United States, or an organization, shall be guilty of a class B felony
CRIMES #338-354:
17. Because Court of Appeals chief judge Matthew E. Johnson, who fixed many of the
appeals against me, refused to address the crime spree and protect my family from further harm,
I did not attend the sentencing hearing in case 09-786 on April 5, 2011.
18. Between April and July 2011, I submitted my PETITION BOOK to the Supreme
Court, but commissioner Richard S. Slowes and assistant commissioner Joanne H. Turner sent
the 2nd, 3rd and 4th petitions and other pleadings back to me, so I sent them to the governor’s
office for delivery directly to chief justice Lorie S. Gildea.
19. Because no one in authority would intervene, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer continued
their crime spree against me and their racketeering against others.
20. On August 5, 2011, Zehnder Fischer submitted her Motion Pursuant to Minn. Stat.
§ 629.58 and Affidavit in Support of Motion, see Exhibit MN-1006; and, without a hearing on
the matter (DODP) and without even waiting the required time period for my response (DODP),
on August 11th, Baxter entered his Order (AOA) forfeiting the $5,000.00 my brother posted to
bail me out of jail when case 09-786 began.
21. In this one incident, Zehnder Fischer and Baxter committed the following crimes:
a. By submitting her motion, Zehnder Fischer committed crimes under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(3); Minn. Stat. § 609.05; Minn. Stat. § 609.515(2); Minn. Stat. § 609.7475, subd. 2(2); and
Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
b. By her false statement in her affidavit, “Defendant, as demonstrated throughout the trial in
this proceeding, has substantial support arrears,” Zehnder Fischer committed another fraud upon
the court and the crime of perjury under Minn. Stat. § 609.48.
c. By not holding a hearing on the matter and by not even waiting for my response, Baxter
committed two more denials of due process, which are crimes under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
d. By entering another known void order, Baxter committed another act outside his authority,
which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2).
e. By entering another known false order, Baxter committed another fraud upon the court
and/or a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4).
f. By agreeing with Zehnder Fischer and deciding her cause in her favor without hearing my
side, Baxter committed a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.515(1)(a).
g. By manifesting another of Zehnder Fischer’s schemes to harass me, Baxter committed a
crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
h. By extending their pattern of criminal activity, Zehnder Fischer and Baxter each committed
another count of racketeering under Minn. Stat. § 609.903.
22. In addition, by forfeiting and transferring my $5,000.00 to my wife, Baxter and
Zehnder Fischer both committed the crime of theft:
609.52 THEFT.
Subdivision 2. Acts constituting theft.
Whoever does any of the following commits theft and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 3:

6
 (1) intentionally and without claim of right takes, uses, transfers, conceals or retains possession of
movable property of another without the other’s consent and with the intent to deprive the owner
permanently of the possession of the property;
Subdivision 3. Sentence.
Whoever commits theft may be sentenced as follows:
(3) to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or
both, if … (a) the value of the property … stolen is more than $1,000 but not more than $5,000;
23. In total here, Zehnder Fischer and Baxter committed 17 crimes to further harass me.
24. This particular crime spree is played out hundreds of times each year in Le Sueur
County, and apparently in Nicollet County, to criminally extort from the poor and ignorant:
a. The prosecutor labels the accused a ‘flight risk’;
b. The judge orders an excessive amount of ‘cash only’ bail;
c. Whatever is paid becomes the price of the plea deal - the amount of the fine;
d. If the case fixers are unable to get any cash, the accused is ‘held’ in jail to increase the
county’s federal funding;
e. The prosecutor, judge, public defender, sheriff, probation agent, treatment specialist, and
other cronies in on the lucrative deals, scare the accused with long prison sentences and long
probation terms and high fines to coerce them into the unfair plea deal, which often times is the
maximum penalty in the Sentencing Guidelines had the accused been convicted by a jury.
25. And in the end, this racketeering scheme in the criminal justice system should result
in life sentences for Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and the other serial case fixers in Minnesota.
CRIMES #355-360:
26. On December 16, 2011, I was falsely arrested for the sixth time.
27. Because Baxter and Zehnder Fischer know full well that my child support obligations
are paid-in-full and that the conviction of nonsupport of my children is false, Zehnder Fischer
knew her complaint was false when made and Baxter knew his warrant was false when issued.
28. With her false complaint and with his false arrest warrant order, Zehnder Fischer and
Baxter committed further counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43 (3) and (4).
29. In addition, at this point, because Baxter and Zehnder Fischer know that I have
evidence to prove their case fixing and racketeering, their conspiracies and crimes against me are
done with the intent to oppress, shakedown, harass, and even cause my suicide if possible, which
is at least a gross misdemeanor under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
CRIMES #361-366:
30. On December 19, 2011, at my bail hearing:
a. Baxter denied my right to counsel, which is another denial of due process and counts of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1) and of oppression under Minn. Stat. § 609.749,
subd. 2(a)(1);
b. Zehnder Fischer falsely labeled me a ‘flight risk,’ which is another fraud upon the court and
counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4) and Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1); and
c. Baxter set my bail at the ridiculously excessive amount of $10,000.00 cash, which violates
my constitutional rights and constitutes counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(1) and Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
CRIMES #367-368:

7
 31. Baxter delayed for 10 days the appointment of a public defender for me, see Exhibit
MN-1007, which is another violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); and then appointed my old
public defender Rick Lea, who I had fired in December 2010 for trying to fix my case against
me, which is at least another count of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3).
CRIMES #369-372:
32. Right after my bail hearing, the sheriff, the jail administrator, the court administrator,
and others, began doing things to prevent my access to the court; and it began to occur to me that
many officials were participating in the racketeering and are on the dole.
33. On January 12, 2012, Baxter declared my pleadings “frivolous,” which he somehow
could determine without even opening the envelopes and reading the pleadings and which
constitutes another fraud upon the court and violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4); Baxter
essentially ordered court administration to reject all my pleadings, which is at least another act
outside authority and counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2) and
obstructions of legal process, both civil and criminal, under Minn. Stat. § 609.50; and my
Counterclaim, my sixteen Combined Civil and Criminal Complaints against the case fixers,
and all my motions and other pleadings were returned to me at the jail; see Exhibit MN-1008.
34. These crimes caused many others to commit crimes too, as part of the overall effort to
unlawfully detain me because of the evidence I have to prove their case fixing.
35. This was not a very smart move for the case fixers, though, because I learned while in
jail that they are fixing nearly every criminal case and nearly every family law case in Le Sueur
County and have been doing so for years and perhaps decades.
CRIMES #373-418:
36. On February 7, 2012, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer, both knowingly acting far outside
their authority due to their automatic disqualifications when they had committed their first
crimes against me, conspired together and with many others and sentenced me to excessive jail
time, to excessive probation time, to pay further child support knowing my child support
obligations are paid-in-full, and to ridiculous probation conditions including a cruel and unusual
‘No Contact Order’ preventing me from contacting my five children, even my two adult
children, knowing that my kids and I had been separated for nearly 5 years and cutoff from all
communications with each other for over 3-½ years and knowing that the order would violate
state and federal laws, my children’s rights and my rights, and common decency; see Exhibit
MN-1009.
37. The crimes committed at sentencing are as follows:
a. Both knowing of their automatic disqualifications, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer acted
outside their authority to sentence another of their victims, which is another count each of criminal
misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2) and of oppression and harassment under Minn. Stat. §
609.749, subd. 2(a)(1);
b. As evidenced in the transcript of the hearing on February 7, 2012, Zehnder Fischer
committed another 15 frauds upon the court (to be specified at a later time) and/or 15 further counts
of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4);
c. Also as evidenced by the transcript, Zehnder Fischer conspired with my wife, my probation
agent Julia Kraemer, and likely many others, to falsify the record with another “ VICTIM IMPACT
STATEMENT,” which the conspirators used to obtain the “confidential report” by the Department

8
 of Corrections referred to on page 4, which constitutes the crime of conspiracy and another count of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4);
d. Also as evidenced by the transcript, Zehnder Fischer induced Baxter to act contrary to the
law in regards to my motion for stay of the proceedings (page 4), in regards to the term and
conditions of probation (page 6), in regards to the No Contact Order (page 7), in regards to paying
further child support (pages 8 and 13-14), and in regard to signing the Probation Agreement within
her timeframe (page13), which constitute 5 more counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.515(2);
e. By knowingly agreeing with each of Zehnder Fischer’s false inducements, Baxter
committed 5 more counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.515(2) and 5 more counts under Minn. Stat. §
609.7475, subd. 2(2);
f. By further processing the known void and fictitious Colorado child support order and
known false arrears balance in Minnesota, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer committed another count
each of the Class B federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 514;
g. By ordering me to pay further child support knowing my obligations are paid-in-full,
Baxter committed further counts under 18 U.S.C. § 514 and Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3) and (4);
h. By ordering the “Child support file is still in effect,” which Baxter knew was closed by
default pursuant to federal law8, Baxter committed further crimes under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2) and
Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1); and, because the child support case is an Interstate Title IV-D
Child Support Enforcement case, Baxter committed one or more federal crimes under the Federal
RICO statutes (and/or Minnesota’s racketeering statute Minn. Stat. § 609.903); and
i. By continuing to portray my as a “Deadbeat Dad,” Baxter and Zehnder Fischer each
committed another count of criminal defamation under Minn. Stat. § 609.765.
38. These crimes show the level of madness of the case fixers, who, in my opinion, are as
evil as evil gets.
CRIMES #419-471:
39. Minnesota Department of Corrections Parole/Probation Agent Julia Kraemer was
appointed my probation agent while I was in jail.
40. Kraemer committed her first crime against me on February 10, 2012; see Exhibit
MN-1010, pages 1-2, when she refused during our first meeting to bring the unconstitutional
probation conditions to the court’s attention, which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
41. On that same day, I tried to file my MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCING ORDER, but
it was rejected like all my other pleadings.
42. While in jail, I witnessed further crimes against other inmates by Kraemer.
43. On March 8, 2012, I wrote to Kraemer’s boss, Scott Halverson, see page 3, for a copy
of the Department of Correction’s ‘confidential report’ sent to Baxter prior to sentencing, but he
never responded.
44. Because of case fixers’ ongoing crime spree and the crimes by Minnesota Supreme
Court Commissioner Rita Coyles DeMeules, see my FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT, and by Minnesota Court of Appeals chief judge Matthew, E. Johnson, I was
unlawfully detained for the entire jail sentence, which totaled 120 days.
45. I was released from the Le Sueur County Jail on April 8, 2012.
46. On April 16th, unbeknownst to me, Kraemer “violated” me, see pages 4-5, for not
8
Closure of a Title IV-D case is regulated by the FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT CASE CLOSURE
REGULATIONS, OEI 06-00-00470; see page 22 of the 3rd petition in my PETITION BOOK.

9
signing my Probation Agreement, which she knew was never corrected; and on April 17th,
Zehnder Fischer wrote another false complaint and Baxter issued his 3rd false arrest warrant, see
page 6; all 3 committing crimes under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4).
47. Here, Kraemer also committed the crime of false reporting:
609.505 FALSELY REPORTING CRIME.
Subdivision 1. False reporting.
Whoever informs a law enforcement officer that a crime has been committed … knowing that it is false
and intending that the officer shall act in reliance upon it, is guilty of a misdemeanor. A person who is
convicted a second or subsequent time under this section is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
48. After witnessing her in action against others while in jail, I believe Kraemer has
committed the crime of false reporting hundreds of times, as part of her role in the racketeering.
49. I was falsely arrested and imprisoned for the 7th time on July 2, 2012; see Exhibit
MN-1011; the crime of false imprisonment (which I was unable to look up at this time), was
committed in conspiracy by Baxter, Zehnder Fischer and Kraemer to harass me; this crime spree
is actually 3 crimes each under Minn. Stat. § 609.05, Minn. Stat. § 609.175, Minn. Stat. §
609.48, Minn. Stat. § 609.515, Minn. Stat. § 609.7475, subd. 2(2), and Minn. Stat. § 609.749,
subd. 2(a)(1), in addition to the false imprisonment.
50. While I was in jail awaiting a hearing, I had one of the guards make a copy of my
“STATEMENT OF RIGHTS,” see page 7 in Exhibit MN-1010, which I remember signing in
December 2011 following my 6th false arrest; and I was reminded of the fact that no one is
receiving a copy of this form because, as is obvious to me now, no one is receiving counsel for
their bail hearings, as guaranteed in the 2nd paragraph of the form, which is a crime that has likely
been committed thousands of times in Le Sueur County.
51. At my bail hearing, Baxter intentionally injured my rights by again falsely claiming
that there were no public defenders ‘available,’ and Zehnder Fischer attempted to injure my
rights by again falsely claiming that I was a ‘flight risk,’ both committing another fraud upon the
court and another count of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3).
52. Baxter released me without bail, but on the condition that I sign the known void
Probation Agreement, see page 9, and refused to dismiss the case and set a hearing in the false
matter on August 21st, which constitutes 2 further counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3).
53. On July 23, 2012, I rode my bicycle from St. Peter to Le Center to attend a probation
meeting with Kraemer; and I hand-delivered a letter citing the legal authority proving that I am
not technically on probation during my appeal and that I showed up out of respect for her, and a
letter showing that I applied for 5 jobs even though I was not required to do so under the law.
54. The transcript of this meeting, see starting on page 12, proves more crimes by
Kraemer:
a. By ignoring my legal citation proving that I am not technically on probation, which she did
repeatedly during our meeting, Kraemer committed at least another count of oppression and
harassment under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1);
b. By refusing to do whatever is needed to suspend the probation conditions during my
appeal, Kraemer committed another count of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1);
c. By obstructing the legal process that would suspend the probation conditions during my
appeal, Kraemer committed a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.50;

10
 d. By conspiring with Zehnder Fischer on the enforcement of the No Contact Order, Kraemer
committed at least another count of oppression and harassment under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd.
2(a)(1), and by threatening further arrests if I violate the no contact order, Kraemer committed a
crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.27, subd. 1(1) and also committed crimes against my 5 children;
e. I’m not sure what to call Kraemer’s pretending to just happen to notice that I had charges
pending in Nicollet County.
55. By conspiring with Zehnder Fischer on my 8th false arrest and arranging to have me
falsely arrested in her office, Kraemer and Zehnder Fischer both committed further crimes of
false imprisonment, and under Minn. Stat. § 609.05, Minn. Stat. § 609.175, Minn. Stat. § 609.48,
Minn. Stat. § 609.515, Minn. Stat. § 609.7475, subd. 2(2), Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1),
and Minn. Stat. § 609.903; not to mention the further crimes by both against my children.
56. To date, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer are civilly and criminally liable for 123 days of
my false imprisonment and Kraemer is civilly and criminally liable for 3 days.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 3rd Day of August 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
1. Under the circumstances detailed in the foregoing Affidavit, all of my previous
requests and assertions of rights in behalf of my family are now demands:
DEMAND #1: Immediate Relief Previously Demanded:
2. If not already initiated, my family needs all of the relief requested in my
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT, immediately.
3. If necessary, a taskforce should be implemented for my family to coordinate the
efforts and services of all three branches of Minnesota government, and so that I have a contact
telephone number for someone in charge.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand immediate relief
previously requested in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and FIRST
SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, a taskforce if necessary, a coordinator, and a contact
telephone number for someone in charge (please write or call and leave information at 507-351-
5846); together with such other and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under

11
the circumstances.

DEMAND #2: Immediate Arrests of First Judicial District Judge M. Michael Baxter, Nicollet
County Attorney Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer, and Department of Corrections Parole/Probation
Agent Julia Kraemer:
4. Because probable cause is established by this complaint and my previous pleadings
for many of the crimes committed by Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and Kraemer, my children and I
are entitled to their immediate arrest.
5. Until the first grand jury is summoned, an appellate judge or justice will need to find
probable cause of one or more of their crimes, which can be easily done by simply verifying the
evidence attached to my complaints.
6. Pursuant to Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 3, the arrests are required.
7. Once the first grand jury is summoned, I demand further investigation into all of the
case fixers’ crimes against my family and others, and I press full charges against Baxter, Zehnder
Fischer, and Kraemer, for all crimes alleged in this complaint and for any additional state or
federal crimes found by the grand jury.
8. In addition, I demand all further crime victim services for my family including:
a. Protection from further harm;
b. Crime victim reparations during the pendency of the criminal case;
c. Prosecution to the fullest extent of the law;
d. Full and timely restitution;
e. Appropriate fines and imprisonment; and
f. All other rights of crime victims pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 611A.01 to 611A.06.
9. And, because of the magnitude of the crime spree alleged herein and the fact that the
suspects have continued to attack me in every way imaginable, I demand the heightened witness
protection-like services previously requested and at least one fulltime bodyguard until the ‘worst
of the offenders’ listed in paragraph 97 on page 18 of my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT are arrested.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand an immediate
finding of probable cause of one or more of the crimes alleged herein; an immediate order for the
arrests of Baxter, Zehnder Fischer and Kraemer; an immediate order summoning a grand jury;
and an order to the grand jury to investigate and charge these three for all crimes alleged in this
complaint and for any additional state or federal crimes found by the grand jury; together with
such other and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #3: Removal from Office, Termination of Employment, Disbarment, Impeachment,
and Banishment from Our Government:
10. For even a small fraction of their offenses, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer and Kraemer
should be removed from office, fired and banned from ever holding another government
position, disbarred if licensed to practice law, and impeached if a judge.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand Baxter, Zehnder
Fischer, and Kraemer’s removals from office, terminations of employment, and banishments

12
from our government, Baxter and Zehnder Fischer’s disbarments, and Baxter’s impeachment;
together with such other and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the
circumstances.
IN CONCLUSION:
11. Because I am a forgiving person, I gave Baxter and Zehnder Fischer many
opportunities to correct the situation in Le Sueur County, but they both just tried harder and
harder to hurt me; and therefore, I am pursuing their life imprisonment.
12. After she is arrested, if agreeable to the grand jury and prosecutors and you, I would
like to give Kraemer an opportunity to turn her life around, but only if she is willing to turn
state’s evidence, and expose the entire case fixing scandal in Le Sueur County and the
Department of Correction’s participation in the racketeering.
DATED this 3rd Day of August 2012. ______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
603 N. Minnesota Ave.
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 3rd Day of August 2012, I mailed two true and correct copies of the
foregoing Second Supplemental Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver the extra copy directly to Minnesota Supreme Court Chief
Justice Lorie S. Gildea. Thank you.)
And, I mailed a true and correct copy of the foregoing Second Supplemental Criminal
Complaint to:
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

13
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. FIRST ADDENDUM
TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

M. MICHAEL BAXTER,
MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER,
JULIA KRAEMER,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
first addendum to my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated August 3,
2012, confidentially, against the above-named defendants for their continued crimes against my
family, and state:
THIS FIRST ADDENDUM IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
 AFFIDAVIT
1. After mailing my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, I received a
further order by judge M. Michael Baxter appointing Richard C. Lea1, see order attached, as my
public defender, for the third time, despite the fact that I had fired Lea in December 2010
because he was fixing the case against me and then sued him the second time he was appointed.
2. Like all his previous orders, Baxter’s order appointing Lea on August 2nd is void.
CRIMES #472-474:
3. In addition to Baxter’s crimes on July 2nd when he stated that no counsel was
available for my bail hearing, see CRIMES #361-366 in my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT, by waiting for a month to appoint a public defender, Baxter committed another
count under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1), and by appointing Lea, who has been participating in the
shakedown and oppression of his clients for many years to assist in the racketeering, Baxter
committed further counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3) and Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
CRIMES #475-483:
4. According to the postmark, Lea mailed his undated letter to me on August 6th, see
letter attached; his letter evidences further criminal misconduct by DOC agent Julia Kraemer.
5. In addition to Kraemer’s crimes alleged in my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, by adding two further false charges against me to induce Baxter to
turn up the heat under color of law, Kraemer committed two more counts under Minn. Stat. §
609.515(2), by refusing to present my case law to the court showing that I am technically not on
probation during my appeal, as promised (see transcript in Exhibit MN-1010) and as required by
law of all officers of the court, Kraemer committed another count under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1),
by presenting to the court two more false violations, Kraemer committed two more frauds upon
the court and two more counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4), and by intending with each further
violation to continue the oppression and harassment, Kraemer committed two more counts under
Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
6. Kraemer knows full well that the ‘No Contact Order’ is not allowed under the
Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines2, is automatically void, and cannot be enforced.
1
Lea’s crimes will be alleged in a subsequent criminal complaint. Lea’s arrest is justified for any one of his crimes
alleged in the 4th petition of my PETITION BOOK, see paragraphs 32, 34, 37, and 45: DODP #84 and 85; FUTC
#44; CR #59, 61, 64-65, 66, 99 and 100.
2
The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines are clear:
(The very first paragraph): “The purpose of the sentencing guidelines is to establish rational and consistent
sentencing standards which reduce sentencing disparity and ensure that sanctions following conviction of a felony
are proportional to the severity of the offense of conviction and the extent of the offender's criminal history. Equity
in sentencing requires (a) that convicted felons similar with respect to relevant sentencing criteria ought to receive
similar sanctions, and (b) that convicted felons substantially different from a typical case with respect to relevant
criteria ought to receive different sanctions.”
Nowhere in the 92-page document is a No Contact order authorized for child support matters. It is only
authorized in the severest of domestic violence cases; and only to prevent contact with the other adult. Baxter,
Zehnder Fischer and Kraemer’s effort to prevent my contact with my children is being done in desperation knowing
now that my kids will be coming to Minnesota to testify in any civil or criminal case that goes to trial; the concerted
effort by the Minnesota and Colorado case fixers to prevent resolution and keep my broken family separated is
especially cruel and sickening when considering that all involved know that my five kids and I haven’t seen each
other for over 5 years and have been cut off from all communications for nearly 4 years.

2
 7. Kraemer also knows that the no contact order is beyond cruel; and, as evidenced in
the transcript of the hearing on July 2nd and the transcript of our meeting in her office on July
23rd, Kraemer and Zehnder Fischer have apparently gone mad and, in conspiracy, are using the
no contact order as a sword against me to keep me busy while they attempt to sabotage my
appeal, #A12-0794, and while they attempt to cover up their case fixing.
8. Because of Kraemer’s insistence that I have no contact with my five children,
including my two adult children, I retract my previous suggestion to allow her an opportunity to
turn her life around if she is willing to turn state’s evidence and expose the case fixing; following
Kraemer’s arrest, I will be pursuing the maximum penalties for her case fixing too - like with
Baxter, Zehnder Fischer and the other case fixers - which I hope will include life in prison.
9. Kraemer knows full well that I am not technically on probation3.
10. Kraemer also knows full well that I was abiding by the law4 in resisting the arrest on
nd
July 2 , that her Violation Report of April 16, 2012, is false, that Zehnder Fischer’s complaint is
void for several reasons including the fact that she was disqualified from the case years ago, that
Baxter’s arrest warrant is void for several reasons including the fact that he was disqualified
from the case years ago, and that Nicollet County law enforcement knew at the time of my arrest
that I could lawfully resist Baxter’s arrest warrant order.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 11th Day of August 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
1. Under the circumstances detailed in the foregoing Affidavit, all of my previous
requests and assertions of rights in behalf of my family are now demands:
DEMAND #1: Immediate Protection Orders:
11. As Lea’s letter confirms, there is a hearing on the 3 false violations in case 09-786 on

This is only one of many crimes that will hopefully send the case fixers to prison for life.
3
The rules provide that upon appeal the conditions for defendant’s release and the factors determining those
conditions are governed by the rules applicable to pretrial release. See Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 29; Mims v. State
(1880) 26 Minn. 494, 5 N.W. 369
4
Where an attempted arrest is unlawful, a person may resist such arrest. State v. Cantieny (1885) 34 Minn. 1, 24
N.W. 458; State v. Miller (1958) 253 Minn. 112, 91 N.W.2d 138

3
August 21, 2012.
2. Because of the continued crime spree against me by Baxter, Zehnder Fischer,
Kraemer, and the other case fixers in the First Judicial District, and because of the absolute
proven facts that they are running an illegitimate court and an illegal racketeering scheme in Le
Sueur County, I will not attend the hearing and demand immediate protection orders.
3. There is absolutely no doubt that following the hearing Baxter, Zehnder Fischer,
Kraemer, Lea, and the other case fixers, will conspire and bring about another set of false
charges, and will thus commit several more crimes against my family.
4. Therefore, since my five children and I are in imminent danger of further harm, we
are entitled to protection orders in addition to the other protection previously demanded.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand immediate
protection orders against the defendants and the other case fixers listed as the ‘worst of the
offenders’ in paragraph 97 of my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, to protect my
family from further harm; together with such other and further sua sponte relief deemed
reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #2: Immediate Transfer of the First Judicial District cases to the Supreme Court:
5. To end the crime spree once and for all, First Judicial District cases 40-FA-07-1253
and 40-CR-09-786 should be immediately transferred to the original jurisdiction of the
Minnesota Supreme Court.
6. The Supreme Court must exercise its supervisory powers in extraordinary situations
like this and its legal authority to do so is cited in endnote “ix” of my CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand an immediate
order transferring the case files and records in First Judicial District cases 40-FA-07-1253 and
40-CR-09-786 to the Minnesota Supreme Court; together with such other and further sua sponte
relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #3: Dismissal of Case 40-CR-09-786 or Suspension of Baxter’s Sentencing Order:
7. As Baxter and the rest of the case fixers know, Baxter’s entire sentencing order, see
in Exhibit MN-1009 starting on page 1, is automatically void on several grounds.
8. While I was in jail, Baxter illegally ordered the clerks to reject all of my pleadings.
9. My MOTION TO MODIFY SENTENCING ORDER, see in Exhibit MN-1008 starting
on page 18, would have procured orders remedying the obvious problems with Baxter’s
sentencing order, at least until I was released from jail.
10. Under the circumstances, the Minnesota Supreme Court should dismiss case 09-786
in its entirety, but in the event that certain things need to be done first, the Supreme Court should
immediately suspend the sentencing order during my appeal pursuant to Minnesota law; see
footnote 3 above.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, I demand an immediate order dismissing case 09-
786 in its entirety or, in the event that certain things need to be done first, an order suspending
the sentencing order during my appeal; together with such other and further sua sponte relief

4
deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DATED this 11th Day of August 2012.
______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
603 N. Minnesota Ave.
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 11th Day of August 2012, I mailed four true and correct copies of the
foregoing First Addendum to Second Supplemental Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
And, because I am indigent, I requested hand-delivery of a true and correct copy to:
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach; and
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

5
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. SECOND ADDENDUM
TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

M. MICHAEL BAXTER,
MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER,
JULIA KRAEMER,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
second addendum to my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 27,
2012, confidentially1, against the above-named defendants for their continued crimes against my
family, and state:
THIS SECOND ADDENDUM IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
NOTICE TO THE OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE CLERK: Please file this criminal complaint, and my
previous criminal complaints, and hand-deliver them directly to Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. DO NOT provide
copies of any of my family’s pleadings, or allow access to our files, to Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules, Court
of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson, or any other official, without my permission.

1
 AFFIDAVIT
1. Because of your failure to dismiss case 40-CR-09-786 and take other appropriate
action when you received my FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT dated August 11, 2012, judge M. Michael Baxter, prosecutor Michelle Zehnder
Fischer2, and DOC Agent Julia Kraemer have continued their crime spree against my family.
2. On August 21, 2012, public defender Richard C. Lea, who Baxter again appointed as
my public defender, for the third time, despite the fact that I had fired Lea in December 2010
because he was fixing the case against me3 and then sued him the second time he was appointed,
see first addendum, called me and left a message about the hearing that day.
3. On August 22nd, Lea wrote to me, see Exhibit MN-2003.
4. Lea’s letter evidences many things including:
a. That he, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and Kraemer intend to keep operating their illegitimate
court despite their automatic disqualification;
b. That he, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, and the other case fixing criminals in the First
Judicial District, will continue pretending in case 09-786 that I am the criminal and they have done
nothing wrong;
c. That he, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, and the other case fixing criminals in the First
Judicial District, will continue enforcing the automatically void “No Contact Order” despite their
knowledge that it violates my children’s rights, my rights, and Colorado 4, Minnesota5, and federal6
law; will continue enforcing the automatically void child support order despite their knowledge that
my child support obligations are paid-in-full; and will continue their crime spree against my family
despite knowing of my criminal complaints; and
d. That Baxter issued his fourth false arrest warrant in the case.
2
Zehnder Fischer is also the Nicollet County Attorney and is involved in the crime spree in the Fifth Judicial
District - see my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.
3
ADDRESS: 106 First Street North, Montgomery, MN 56069 - Lea’s crimes will be alleged in a subsequent
criminal complaint. Lea’s arrest is justified for any one of his crimes alleged in the 4 th petition of my PETITION
BOOK, see paragraphs 32, 34, 37, and 45: DODP #84 and 85; FUTC #44; CR #59, 61, 64-65, 66, 99 and 100.
4
For one: Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) 14-10-124 (emphasis added):
(1) Legislative declaration. The general assembly finds and declares that it is in the best interest of all parties to
encourage frequent and continuing contact between each parent and the minor children of the marriage after the
parents have separated or dissolved their marriage. In order to effectuate this goal, the general assembly urges
parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child-rearing and to encourage the love, affection, and contact
between the children and the parents.
5
For one: The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines do not allow a No Contact Order in child support
matters:
(The first paragraph): “The purpose of the sentencing guidelines is to establish rational and consistent sentencing
standards which reduce sentencing disparity and ensure that sanctions following conviction of a felony are
proportional to the severity of the offense of conviction and the extent of the offender's criminal history. Equity in
sentencing requires (a) that convicted felons similar with respect to relevant sentencing criteria ought to receive
similar sanctions, and (b) that convicted felons substantially different from a typical case with respect to relevant
criteria ought to receive different sanctions.”
6
For one: Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (emphasis added):
(Citizenship defined - privileges of citizens) …No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or
property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.

2
CRIMES #484-511:
5. In addition to the 483 crimes alleged and proven in my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and its first addendum, the defendants committed the following further
crimes:
a. By continuing their pattern of criminal activity against my family and other victims in the
First Judicial District, Lea, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and Kraemer, have committed at least one
further count each of racketeering pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.903;
b. By continuing their harassment and oppression, Lea, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and
Kraemer, committed at least one further count each under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1); and
c. By conspiring and attempting to coerce me into turning myself in on their false charges,
Lea, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and Kraemer, committed at least one further count each under Minn.
Stat. §§ 609.175 and 609.275;
d. By conspiring and attempting to arrest and prosecute me again on further known false
charges, Lea, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, and Kraemer, committed at least one further count each
under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.175 and 609.17;
e. By inducing Baxter to issue another false arrest warrant against me, Zehnder Fischer and
Kraemer committed another count each under Minn. Stat. § 609.515(2);
f. By agreeing with Zehnder Fischer and Kraemer on their wrongful course of action, Baxter
committed another count under Minn. Stat. § 609.515(1); and
g. By issuing another false arrest warrant against me, Baxter committed another act of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(4).
6. This complaint is key: If any one of these defendants is charged with any one of their
crimes, the crime spree against my family will end.
7. As soon as the first grand jury is summoned, the grand jurors will be able to indict the
case fixers; but until then, one of the justices will have to verify7 probable cause of at least one of
their crimes to justify the immediate arrest warrants.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 19th Day of September 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
7
No further investigation is needed to establish probable cause of most of the crimes, as sufficient evidence was
attached to my PETITION BOOK (2 copies of which are already at the Supreme Court) and sufficient evidence is
also attached to my recent criminal complaints.

3
DEMANDS: Immediate Arrests and Fulfillment of Previous Demands:
8. Because evidence establishing probable cause of several of the defendants’ crimes
was attached to my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and its’ first
addendum, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, Lea, and other case fixing criminals in the First
Judicial District, should have already been arrested.
9. Because you, Minnesota’s highest authorities, now know for a fact that my five
children and I are victims of several very serious crimes, all of my previous demands in my
previous criminal complaints should have already been fulfilled.
10. Your negligence in protecting my family can mean only one thing.
11. If by September 30, 2012, Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, Lea, and the others
previously named as the ‘worst of the offenders,’ are not arrested, or any of my other demands in
my criminal complaints are not fulfilled, I will assume that you, Minnesota’s highest authorities,
and/or your offices, are involved or are willfully neglecting your duties.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, as a citizen of the state of Minnesota and as a
crime victim, and having provided ample evidence establishing probable cause of one or more
crimes against my family by the defendants, I DEMAND the immediate arrest of Baxter,
Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, and Lea, and fulfillment of all of my other demands in my criminal
complaints to date8 no later than September 30, 2012.

DATED this 19th Day of September 2012.

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

8
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 14, 2012;
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 27, 2012;
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 23, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 28, 2012.

4
 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 19th Day of September 2012, I mailed true and correct copies of the
foregoing First Addendum to First Supplemental Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Office of the Appellate Clerk
FOR: Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
305 Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

5
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),

Plaintiffs,

v. THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

CAROL A. WALTER,
SUE WOLFE,
REBECCA BRAUN,
DOUGLAS L. RICHARDS,
ALLISON L. KREHBIEL,
CAROL MELICK,
THE OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL,
BOARD OF NICOLLET COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER,
DAVE LANGE,
MIKE O’GORMAN,
JOAN TESDAHL,
TODD PRAFKE,
MATHEW PETERS,
MATT GROCHOW,
DAVID ARPIN,
MICHAEL PENNING,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
third supplemental criminal complaint, confidentially, against my wife and the above-named
defendants in Nicollet County for their crimes against my family, and state:
THIS THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
 Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
INTRODUCTION
1. This criminal complaint is STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL.
2. My wife, Carol A. Walter, and I grew up in St. Peter, Nicollet County, Minnesota.
3. We moved to Colorado in the early 1980s.
4. We have 6 children, 5 of which are living.
5. Carol and her two sisters, Sue and Becky, who still live in St. Peter, secretly planned
Carol’s divorce, systematically stole from me all through marriage, brainwashed all 5 of my
children against me, laid-in-wait for 22 years until I had accumulated sufficient assets for them,
and are now desperately trying to prevent contact so the kids and others won’t discover the truth.
6. By massive fraud in her wrongful Colorado divorce in 2006, Carol obtained near-full
custody of our five kids, sole decision-making ability, over 95% of the estate I built, a grossly
inflated child support order, and other miscellaneous orders designed to wipe me out financially.
7. In addition, my family was purposely destroyed in a “fixed”1 divorce and everything I
had, including my five children, my paid-off home and business headquarters on 27-acres, my
business inventory, my business assets, eight vehicles, my premarital property, my personal
property, my inheritances, and even my deceased brother’s cremated ashes, was stolen from me.
8. In addition to converting my life’s work to my wife, the divorce judge, knowing that
my financial obligations to raise my children to adulthood were already paid-in-full, enslaved me
with a child support order that was more than I was earning at the time; and, following the
divorce, the officers of the court stole my remaining resources, diminished my retirement savings
to zero, allowed Carol to keep the little I was awarded including my work things, falsely arrested
me 3 more times, and literally drove me out of Colorado to protect myself.
9. Thinking I would be safe near family and friends, I moved back to Minnesota near
my hometown, but soon found out that Minnesota is just as corrupt as Colorado.
10. The Minnesota First Judicial District case fixers, all knowing that my child support
obligations are paid-in-full, falsely charged me with ‘nonsupport’ of my children, framed me as a
“Deadbeat Dad,” maliciously prosecuted me, denied me counsel, witnesses, evidence, and due
process, defrauded the jury, converted the jury trial into a bench trial, falsely convicted me,
unjustly sentenced me, falsely imprisoned me for 120 days, imposed an excessive probation term
and unjust probation conditions on me; and, all knowing that my five children and I have been
separated since May 2007 and have been cutoff from all communications with each other since
August 2008, imposed cruel and unusual punishments on me including a ‘No Contact Order’ in
1
See paragraph 15 and endnotes ii-iii in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.

2
an attempt to prevent me from contacting my children, including my two adult children.
11. And now, the case fixers in both states have joined forces, together and with my wife,
to hold my kids, my life, and resolution to the issues they caused, hostage, because they know
that I have enough evidence to put them all in jail.
12. The case fixers in Minnesota’s Fifth Judicial District named as defendants in this
action are currently conspiring and working with the other case fixers in both states to:
a. Avoid the charges they deserve and their apprehension;
b. Bring further spurious charges against me;
c. Prosecute the known false charges against me in both districts;
d. Leave the child support matters and all my family’s civil and criminal matters unresolved;
e. Continue preventing my contact with my children;
f. Sabotage my First Civil Complaint in case 52-CV-12-366, my Second Civil Complaint,
and my appeal of the conviction in 40-CR-09-786, #A12-794.
13. When Nicollet County Attorney Michelle Zehnder Fischer and the Le Sueur County
case fixers named in my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (Baxter and
Kraemer) discovered that I had moved to St. Peter in April 2012 following my release from jail
in case 09-786, they began conspiring with law enforcement and city and county officials in
Nicollet County to set me up for additional false charges.
14. On July 2nd, I was falsely arrested for the 7th time, as planned in a grand conspiracy by
Zehnder Fischer and the Le Sueur County case fixers, St. Peter Police Chief Mathew Peters,
Nicollet County Sheriff Dave Lange, and likely Fifth Judicial District judge Allison L. Krehbiel,
Nicollet County Human Service Director Joan Tesdahl, and others.
15. On July 6th, unbeknownst to me until I was falsely arrested for the 8th time on July
23rd, as planned in a grand conspiracy by Zehnder Fischer and the other Le Sueur County case
fixers, and most if not all of the other defendants in this action, judge Krehbiel issued another
false arrest warrant starting Fifth Judicial District case 52-CR-12-278 and setting in motion the
current crime spree in Nicollet County.
16. On July 23rd, I was falsely arrested for the 8th time, as planned by the defendants.
AFFIDAVIT
17. I, JOHN M. HENTGES, victim and affiant, am now a homeless citizen of the state of
Minnesota; my five children* presently reside in Jefferson County Colorado - *All of my children
were minors when the crime spree in Minnesota began.
18. Defendant CAROL A. WALTER is my wife2 and presently resides in Jefferson
County Colorado at 31,000 U.S. Hwy. 40, Evergreen, CO 80439.
19. Defendant SUE WOLFE is Carol’s sister, who presently resides in Nicollet County
Minnesota at 41175 County Road 20, St. Peter, MN 56082.
20. Defendant REBECCA BRAUN is Carol’s sister, who presently resides in Nicollet
County Minnesota at 807 Churchill Court, St. Peter, MN 56082.
21. Defendant DOUGLAS L. RICHARDS is currently the Chief Judge of the Fifth
2
Due to the fraud and case fixing, Carol and I are not divorced and “permanent orders” in Carol’s divorce are
void.

3
Judicial District, whose workplace is located at the Faribault County Courthouse, 415 North
Main, Blue Earth, MN 56013.
22. Defendant ALLISON L. KREHBIEL is currently a Fifth Judicial District Judge in
Nicollet County, whose workplace is located at 501 S. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082.
23. Defendant CAROL MELICK is currently a Fifth Judicial District court administrator
in Nicollet County, whose workplace is located at 501 S. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082.
24. Defendant THE OFFICE OF THE MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL is
currently headed by Lori Swanson, whose workplace is located at 1400 Bremer Tower, 445
Minnesota Street, St. Paul, MN 55101.
25. Defendant BOARD OF NICOLLET COUNTY COMMISSIONERS is currently
comprised of Dr. Bruce Beatty, Jack Kolars, David Haack, Jim Stenson, and Marie Dranttel,
whose workplace is located at 501 S. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082.
26. Defendant MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER, whose workplace is located at 326
S. Minnesota Ave., St. Peter, MN 56082, is currently the Nicollet County Attorney (in the Fifth
Judicial District) and is still illegally acting as the prosecutor in 2 cases against me.
27. Defendant DAVE LANGE is currently the Nicollet County Sheriff, whose workplace
is located at 121 West Myrtle Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
28. Defendant MIKE O’GORMAN is currently a Nicollet County Sheriff Deputy, whose
workplace is located at 121 West Myrtle Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
29. Defendant JOAN TESDAHL is currently the Nicollet County Human Service
Director, whose workplace is located at 108 S. Minnesota Ave., Suite 200, St. Peter, MN 56082.
30. Defendant TODD PRAFKE is currently the St. Peter City Administrator, whose
workplace is located at 227 S. Front Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
31. Defendant MATHEW PETERS is currently the St. Peter Police Chief, whose
workplace is located at 227 S. Front Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
32. Defendant MATT GROCHOW is currently a St. Peter Police Detective, whose
workplace is located at 227 S. Front Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
33. Defendant DAVID ARPIN is currently a St. Peter Police Officer, whose workplace is
located at 227 S. Front Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
34. Defendant MICHAEL PENNING is currently a St. Peter Police Officer, whose
workplace is located at 227 S. Front Street, St. Peter, MN 56082.
35. Incorporated herein by reference, and to be adjudicated by the Supreme Court, are:
a. The records in Interstate Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement case 30-289499-44-1A;
b. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-FA-07-1253;
c. The pleadings and records in Minnesota First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786;
d. Minnesota Supreme Court case A08-1414
e. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A08-2079;
f. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-334;
g. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-390;
h. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A11-627;
i. Minnesota Supreme Court case A11-700;

4
 j. My four PETITIONS3 TO THE COLORADO AND MINNESOTA SUPREME COURTS
(my “PETITION BOOK”);
k. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-19;
l. Minnesota Court of Appeals case A12-794;
m. My First Civil Complaint and other pleadings in Minnesota Fifth Judicial District case 52-
CV-12-366; and my Second Civil Complaint and other pleadings submitted to the Minnesota Fifth
Judicial District Courts, but never filed4;
n. My CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012;
o. My FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated July 27, 2012;
p. My SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated August 3, 2012; and
q. My FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
dated August 11, 2012.
CRIMES #1-6875:
36. As everyone intimately involved in my cases knows, my wife Carol is mentally ill6.
37. Carol has committed hundreds of crimes against our children and me including:
a. The murder of our first child;
b. Many acts of domestic violence;
c. Thefts;
d. Frauds;
e. Frauds upon the court;
f. Relentless brainwashing and other child abuses to turn our children against me;
g. Denials of visitation and contact with our children.
38. Many of Carol’s child abuses and crimes were committed in conspiracy with her two
sisters, Sue and Becky, who have lived in St. Peter all their lives, who have worked for the
Minnesota Department of Human Services at the St. Peter Regional Treatment Facility for most
of their careers, who’s mother was committed for her mental illness, and who, according to
others, have been treated for their mental illnesses for many years.
39. I am not sure if Sue and Becky were involved in the murder of my first child, but do
know that the 3 sisters, who I collectively refer to as the “Walter Sisters” in my complaints,
secretly conspired and planned during Carol’s and my 22-year relationship to take advantage of
me in life and to set up their gold-digger divorce by:
a. Systematically brainwashing each of our children against me;
b. Systematically skimming from our marital accounts and sending money to Minnesota for

3
PETITIONS FOR EN BANC REVIEW, PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (Colorado), PETITION
FOR RECONCILIATION AND CLOSURE OF TITLE IV-D CASE, and PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT (Minnesota), with 450 pages of documentary evidence proving most of the 189 denials of due process,
41 acts outside authority, 189 frauds upon the court, and 109 crimes, alleged therein, committed against my family,
any one of which required the appellate review and relief requested under Minn. R. Civ. P. Rule 60.
4
All of which were submitted to the Minnesota Supreme Court along with my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT dated July 14, 2012.
5
In my COMBINED VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION, FIRST CIVIL COMPLAINT, AND FIRST
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT filed in Colorado in November 2011, I alleged 353 specific acts of child abuse and 334
specific acts of criminal misconduct by Carol and her accomplices; and I attached 267 pages of documentary
evidence to prove most of the Colorado crimes and crimes in Minnesota to influence the legal processes.
6
Due to Carol’s mental illness, civil and criminal liabilities for all of Carol’s child abuses and crimes are
imputable to the states and the individuals who have knowingly aided in her crimes.

5
 safekeeping;
c. Systematically stockpiling “Beanie Babies” and other collectibles, purchased with marital
money, supposedly for a business, but actually for profit in their divorce with the intent to
permanently deprive me of my share.
d. Lying-in-wait until I paid off all debts and had accumulated substantial assets.
e. Defrauding the family law courts in Colorado;
f. Calling 911 and making false accusations of domestic violence against me;
g. Stealing my life’s work; and
h. Denying visitation and contact to completely remove me from the lives of my children.
40. The Walter Sisters’ crimes are well documented in my PETITION BOOK.
41. The Walter Sisters stole over $75,000.00 from me by skimming from marital
accounts, stole over $75,000.00 from me by purchasing collectibles with marital money and
stockpiling them for their divorce, and stole over $75,000.00 from me by keeping and selling or
pawning my premarital, personal and business property, much of the proceeds of which was sent
to Minnesota and is being held by Sue and Becky.
42. In addition, the Walter Sisters and their accomplices in the Colorado courts stole my
share of the real estate, now known to be worth over $1,000,000.00.
43. The Walter Sisters also stole my intellectual property worth approximately
$250,000.00.
44. The Walter Sisters also stole my inheritances from my deceased parents, my deceased
brother’s entire estate, and even my parents’ portrait and brother’s cremated ashes, all of which
are of great sentimental value to me.
45. But most wickedly, with the intent to cause my suicide, the Walter Sisters relentlessly
sabotaged and totally devastated my relationships with each of my children, which, as they and
the case fixers in both states know, are more precious to me than any of my assets or belongings
or anything else in my life.
46. Following my move to Minnesota in May 2007, the Walter Sisters continued to abuse
each of my children to further strain my relationships with them, and, aided by the case fixers,
continued to commit crimes against me in Colorado and Minnesota to keep the child support
scam going.
47. Under Colorado and Minnesota law, all of Carol’s crimes against me are acts of
domestic violence or spousal abuse.
48. I began reporting the continued child abuses and crimes to Le Sueur County and
Minnesota officials in May 2007.
49. I began reporting the continued child abuses and crimes to Nicollet County officials
in September 2009.
50. The simple fact that the Walter Sisters would be perfectly happy if five children never
saw or talked to their father again proves their mental illnesses and the states’ liability for their
actions; similarly, the simple fact that Baxter, Zehnder Fischer, Kraemer, Krehbiel, Tesdahl, and
other officers of the Minnesota courts, would be perfectly happy if five children never saw or
talked to their father again proves the officers’ madness and the states’ liability for their actions.

6
 51. Because the Walter Sisters are mentally ill, civil and criminal liabilities 7 for their
actions are imputable to the states and local municipalities and the individuals involved in the
case fixing, obstruction of justice and/or intentional negligence done in support of the crimes.
52. The criminal factions within our Colorado and Minnesota courts and offices, and
within our local offices, are criminally liable to my family not only for the child abuses, crimes,
and domestic violence committed in their state but also for the crimes in the other state because
they looked the other way in support of the Walter Sisters’ continued crime sprees.
53. The individual Nicollet County defendants named in this complaint who knew about
the Walter Sisters’ mental illnesses and are therefore criminally liable for the continued child
abuses and crimes are Zehnder Fischer, Lange, Tesdahl, and Krehbiel.
54. In addition, Zehnder Fischer is complicit in the Walter Sisters’ continued child abuses
and crimes in Colorado, is a principal in the Walter Sisters’ crimes in Minnesota and the ongoing
denials of visitation and contact and other child abuses and spousal abuses, and is committing her
own child abuses against my children and me by exploiting Carol’s mental illness and enforcing
the known void ‘No Contact Order.’ So are Kraemer and Baxter.
CRIMES #688-12288:
55. In the same way that Minnesota officials are civilly and criminally liable for the
Walter Sisters’ crimes, Minnesota officials are also liable for the criminal negligence by
Colorado officials in appropriately dealing with the Walter Sisters and their accomplices.
56. Furthermore, but not included in this section, Minnesota officials are also liable for
the criminal misconduct by Colorado officials to keep the child support scam going; for one
example, judge Perkins and judge Baxter both knew that Colorado child support enforcement
officials were committing perjury in their sworn Registration Statements, as to the arrears
balance and amounts I paid but never credited, to procure registration of the known void and
fictitious child support order and known false arrears balance in Minnesota; see my PETITION
BOOK.
CRIMES BY THE DEFENDANTS IN THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT:
57. In addition to being responsible to some extent for the Walter Sisters’ child and
spousal abuses and other crimes, and for the ongoing criminal misconduct by Colorado officials,
the individual defendants in Minnesota’s Fifth Judicial District knowingly committed further
crimes under Minnesota lawi to fix the cases against me, to obstruct justice, and/or to criminally
neglect their duties in support of the continued racketeering in both states.
CRIMES #1229-1234:
58. In September 2009, I reported the ongoing case fixing in the First Judicial District to

7
According to precedence, I will be suing Minnesota and the counties, cities and individuals involved, for an
estimated three billion dollars in damages; I am unsure at this point how criminal liability is calculated, but know
that I will be requesting the maximum fines, imprisonment and restitution for the case fixers and others who had an
opportunity to stop the madness and correct the record but refused.
8
In my COMBINED VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION, FIRST CIVIL COMPLAINT, AND FIRST
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT filed in Colorado in November 2011, I alleged 541 specific acts of criminal negligence
by Colorado officials.

7
Le Sueur Police Chief Bruce Kelly9; and I reported the Walter Sisters’ ongoing Colorado child
abuses and crimes, and their crimes in Minnesota to influence the registration proceeding in case
07-1253, to Nicollet County Sheriff Dave Lange - see Exhibit MN-1012.
59. Over the next 6 months, I provided Kelly and Lange with ample evidence to prove
probable cause of many crimes by the case fixers in the First Judicial District and many crimes
by the Walter Sisters, but, unbeknownst to me, neither intended to investigate at all.
60. As alleged in my PETITION BOOK, Lange refused to investigate and refused to
provide results of his supposed investigation, committing two10 crimes under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(1); and/or11, by conspiring with Kelly and others to deprive my children and me our
rights as crime victims in Minnesota’s Criminal Justice System, Lange committed two federal
crimesii under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242.
61. In addition, by obstructing justice for the Walter Sisters, Lange committed a crime
under Minn. Stat. § 609.50(1) and/or a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).
62. In addition, by not reporting the Walter Sisters’ felonies to a judge, Lange committed
a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 4 (not included in total).
63. A few months later, Lange also conspired with and provided confidential information
to Zehnder Fischer12 knowing she was maliciously prosecuting me in First Judicial District case
09-786 in Le Sueur County, committing further crimes under Minn. Stat. § 609.05, Minn. Stat. §
609.749, subd. 2(a)(2), and/or 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242.
64. On November 18, 2011, I wrote a final letter to Lange and Le Sueur County law
enforcement to do their duties and asked them to “step up or step down,” see starting on page 3
of Exhibit MN-1012, but Lange failed again to respond, committing at least one more count of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
65. By intentionally ignoring my pleas as a crime victim to do his part in support of
Zehnder Fischer and the other case fixers’ pattern of criminal activity, Lange committed multiple
counts of the crime of racketeering13 under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
66. Of all the defendants in this action, Lange and Zehnder Fischer are the most
responsible for the Walter Sisters’ continued child and spousal abuses and other crimes.

9
Kelly’s crimes prior to March 2011 are alleged in my PETITION BOOK and his further crimes will be alleged in
a separate criminal complaint.
10
DODP #66 and CR #52.
11
The federal crimes, which were reported to and criminally neglected by federal officials, are not included in the
totals; imputation of civil and criminal liability to the criminal factions in our federal government will be addressed
in separate actions. The Minnesota case fixers should do everything possible to settle the civil matters with my
family and accept plea deals at the state level because otherwise I will demand prosecution also at the federal level
and will do everything I can to secure their life imprisonment. Only Lange’s federal crimes are alleged in this action
(but not included in the totals); the federal crimes of the other Fifth Judicial officials will be alleged in future actions
if necessary.
12
As alleged in my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, Zehnder Fischer committed 98 of
the crimes alleged in my PETITION BOOK: DODP #74, 77, 91, 105, 111, 126-133, 158-159, 165, 167-169, 174-
176, 181-183, and 186; AOA #24, 28, 34-36, and 41; FUTC #39, 47-69, 71, 79, 82, 127-128, 153-157, and 168-176;
CR #53-54, 56-58, 59, 64, 70-71, 79, 86-87, 92, 94, and 96-104; and many more crimes against my family since.
13
On information and belief, Lange has taken part in the false arrests of hundreds of ignorant criminal defendants
and has been on the dole for years of a portion of the cash bails extorted from victims in the criminal justice system.

8
CRIMES #1235-1261:
67. While I was being unlawfully detained in jail earlier this year in case 09-786, my
brother’s house in Le Sueur that I was living in was sold. I was released from the Le Sueur
County Jail on April 8, 2012. I moved to St. Peter on April 13th and into a house owned by other
siblings that was for sale. Unbeknownst to me, my probation officer Julia Kraemer falsely
violated me for not signing the known void Probation Agreement while in jail. See SECOND
SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.
68. Over the next month or so, with the hope of resolving the child support matters once-
and-for-all, I wrote and submitted my First Civil Complaint along with 119 pages of
documentary evidence to substantiate all my claims and voluminous amounts of controlling law
and case law to justify the relief requested, which was filed on May 18, 2012, as case 52-CV-12-
366, and was assigned to Fifth Judicial District Judge Allison L. Krehbiel.
69. Under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct, Code of Judicial Conduct, judge
Krehbiel is required to do many things: (emphasis added)
Rule 1.1 Compliance with the Law: A judge shall comply with the law, including the Code of
Judicial Conduct.
Rule 2.2 Impartiality and Fairness: A judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform
all duties of judicial office fairly and impartially.
Rule 2.4 External Influences on Judicial Conduct: (C) A judge shall not convey or permit
others to convey the impression that any person or organization [including the state] is in a position to
influence the judge.
Rule 2.6 Ensuring the Right to Be Heard: (A) A judge shall accord to every person who has a
legal interest in a proceeding, or that person's lawyer, the right to be heard according to law.
Rule 2.7 Responsibility to Decide: A judge shall hear and decide matters assigned to the judge,
except when disqualification is required by Rule 2.11 or other law.
Rule 2.11 Disqualification: (A) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in
which the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned …
Rule 2.15 Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct: (A) A judge having knowledge
[from my PETITION BOOK] that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a
substantial question regarding the judge's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other
respects shall inform the appropriate authority. (B) A judge having knowledge [from my PETITION
BOOK] that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a
substantial question regarding the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other
respects shall inform the appropriate authority. (C) A judge who receives credible information [in my
PETITION BOOK] indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of
this Code shall take appropriate action. (D) A judge who receives credible information [in my
PETITION BOOK] indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the
Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.
70. Because of the No Contact Order in case 09-786, I filed my Ex Parte Motion for
Preliminary Orders and provided court administrator Carol Melick with a prepaid priority mail
package containing my wife’s copy of the complaint, summons, two copies of the Notice and
Acknowledgement of Receipt of Complaint and Summons and a self-addressed postage-
prepaid return envelope, but Krehbiel never addressed the motion, committing her first crime
under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1), and never even ordered the mailing to my wife, violating her
duties under Rule 2.6 above and committing another count under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
71. Along with my Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary Orders, I filed a copy of my

9
PETITION BOOK with 450 pages of documentary evidence, see footnote 3 above, so that the
assigned judge could see the crime spree against my family with his or her own eyes and so that
the judge and other professionals involved could take appropriate action, but my requests to seal
the portion of the record alleging criminal misconduct were never addressed, which is another
count for Krehbiel under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
72. From my evidence and citations of controlling law and case law included with my
First Civil Complaint and PETITION BOOK, Krehbiel now knows full well:
a. That my child support obligations are paid-in-full;
b. That she not only had the authority but also the obligation to find and conclude that my
child support obligations are satisfied;
c. That the Colorado child support order and arrears balance were obtained by fraud;
d. That the Colorado child support order is not based on the facts, the evidence, or the law;
e. That the Colorado child support order is fictitious and the arrears balance is false;
f. That registration of the order and arrears balance in Minnesota was obtained by fraud;
g. That the Minnesota registration order is not based on the facts, the evidence, or the law;
h. That she not only had the authority but also the obligation to find and conclude that the
Colorado child support order and arrears balance and the Minnesota registration order were
obtained by fraud and are not based on the facts, the evidence, or the law;
i. That the child support order, arrears balance and registration order are void;
j. That she not only had the authority but also the obligation to declare the Minnesota and
Colorado orders void, on any one of several different grounds;
k. That she not only had the authority but also the obligation to vacate the Minnesota and
Colorado orders, on any one of several different grounds;
l. That she not only had the authority but also the obligation to close the Interstate Title IV-
D Child Support Enforcement case, on any one of four different grounds;
m. That all facts, evidence, controlling law and precedence are on my side;
n. That my facts have never been refuted, my evidence has never been rebutted, and my
citations of controlling law and precedence have never been objected to or challenged;
o. That the state of Minnesota owes me $78,536.00 for my affirmative expenses in asserting
my family’s rights over the past 5 years;
p. That I abided by the law to support my children;
q. That all officials involved in the child support matters over the past 7 years have broken
one or more laws in their illegal pursuit to force me to pay my child support obligations again so
their county and state can profit from federal funding in the child support enforcement racket;
r. That the charge of ‘non-support’ of my children in case 09-786 is false;
s. That despite my innocence, I had been falsely arrested and imprisoned 6 times at the time;
t. That Zehnder Fischer and the other case fixers in the First Judicial District are criminals;
u. That probable cause of hundreds of crimes against my family was proven in my PETITION
BOOK and was therefore then established on the record in Fifth Judicial District case 12-366;
v. That she had an obligation to issue appropriate arrest warrants or summonses under Minn.
R. Crim. P. Rule 3 and to ‘inform the appropriate authority’ pursuant to Rule 2.15 above;
w. That my five children and I are crime victims;
x. That, due to the crime spree against our family, my five children and I had been separated
for over 5 years and had been cutoff from all communications with each other for nearly 4 years;
y. That she had an obligation to protect my family from further harm and to secure crime
victim services, heightened witness protection-like services, grand jury investigations, special
prosecutors, and other services in Nicollet County for us under the circumstances;
z. That, by adjudicating any one of the six causes of action in my First Civil Complaint, the
crime spree would end.

10
 73. Because the state failed to answer the complaint, I won this case on June 4, 2012; and
have been entitled to default judgment in my favor and all of the relief requested ever since.
74. On June 5, 2012, I submitted my Motion for Default Judgment (against the State
of Minnesota).
75. By refusing to adjudicate the merits of the six counts in my First Civil Complaint,
by refusing to approve my in forma pauperis application and hear or decide the reimbursement
issue brought in my Ex Parte Affidavit of Financial Status and Motion for Reimbursement
Order, and by refusing to pronounce default judgment in my favor, Krehbiel violated Rules 1.1,
2.2, 2.4, and 2.7 above, and committed 8 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(1).
76. By failing to inform the appropriate authority about the case fixing evidenced in my
PETITION BOOK by judges Baxter, Perkins, Lynch, Toussaint, and Johnson and lawyers
Zehnder Fischer, Christian, Lea, O’Connor, Holmgren, and Stuart, Krehbiel violated Rule 2.15
above, and committed 11 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
77. By intentionally failing to issue appropriate arrest warrants or summonses against
Zehnder Fischer and Lange, Krehbiel violated Minn. R. Crim. P. Rule 3 and committed 2 more
counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
78. By intentionally failing to protect my family from further harm, to secure crime
victim services and heightened witness protection-like services, to summon one or more grand
juries for investigations and appoint one or more special prosecutors, Krehbiel committed at least
3 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
79. Of all the defendants in this action, Krehbiel is the most responsible for the Walter
Sisters’ continued child and spousal abuses and other crimes and for the continued case fixing in
both states since June 5, 2012.
CRIMES #1262-1307:
80. In August 2011, after hearing of the news that Zehnder Fischer would likely become
the Nicollet County Attorney when Michael Riley retired, I wrote to the Board of Nicollet
County Commissioners to inform them of Zehnder Fischer’s case fixing and unfitness for the
job, see Exhibit MN-1013, but the Board failed to take the appropriate and required action,
committing at least one count of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1), not only
against my family, but also against the citizens of Nicollet County; the Board’s concealment to
this day of Zehnder Fischer’s crimes is another and more serious crime.
81. At considerable expense of time and money beginning on May 18, 2012, when I
submitted my First Civil Complaint, I wrote several letters to the Board of Nicollet County
Commissioners and to Nicollet County Human Service Director Joan Tesdahl14, see starting on
page 2 of Exhibit MN-1013, to request the county’s assistance in the matters being raised in case
52-CV-12-366 and to end the ongoing child abuses by the Walter Sisters.
82. By refusing again to fire Zehnder Fischer and by refusing to fire Lange, the Board

14
I also provided Ms. Tesdahl with a copy of my First Civil Complaint and evidence and other pleadings in case
12-366 for her Child Support Supervisor Jane Anderson and a copy of my COMBINED VERIFIED PETITION
FOR DISSOLUTION, FIRST CIVIL COMPLAINT, AND FIRST CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (“MY DIVORCE”)
and evidence for her Child Protective Services Supervisor Cindy McCabe.

11
committed at least 2 more counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
83. By not reporting Zehnder Fischer and Lange’s crimes to a judge, the Board
committed a state crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.50(1) and/or a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. §
4 (not included in total).
84. By continuing to employ and associate with Zehnder Fischer and Lange knowing that
they have been engaging in a pattern of criminal activity for years, the Board is participating in
their racketeering15 under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
85. On July 3, 2012, Zehnder Fischer responded for Tesdahl to decline all Nicollet
County child support and child protection services to my family; see page 15 in MN-1013.
86. On July 16th, I wrote to Tesdahl, asked her to resign, and informed her that I would be
stopping by to pick up the copies I provided her of my First Civil Complaint and MY
DIVORCE, but when I went to her office Tesdahl was not there and neither was my property.
87. By denying my right to open a child support case and a child protection case in
Nicollet County, by denying my right to the transfer of the federally mandated Title IV-D case to
Nicollet County, by denying my right to verification and administrative finding of the pertinent
child support facts, by denying my right to reconciliation and closure of my child support
account, by denying my right to investigation of the child abuses committed by Walter Sisters
Sue and Becky and other Nicollet County residents, and by denying my right to Nicollet County
assistance and recommendations for ending the child abuses, Tesdahl and Zehnder Fischer both
committed at least 7 counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1) and/or 7
counts of federal crimes under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 (not included in total).
88. By not reporting the felony denials of visitation and other child abuses by the Walter
Sisters or the felonies committed by their counterparts in Le Sueur County Minnesota and
Jefferson County Colorado in the federally mandated Title IV-D case, Tesdahl and Zehnder
Fischer both committed at least 3 counts of a state crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.50(1) and/or 3
counts of a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 4 (not included in total).
89. By engaging in multiple denials of due process in my case and by doing absolutely
nothing for my suffering family, Tesdahl and Zehnder Fischer are both purposefully participating
in the crime of racketeering16 under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count each included in total).
90. By conspiring with each other to deny my family all human services in Nicollet
County for the purposes of continuing the avoidance of resolution in the child support matter and
further processing and passing along the known void and fictitious child support order and false
arrears balance for further collection attempts, Tesdahl and Zehnder Fischer both committed a
Class B federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 514.
91. By conspiring with each other, and likely the Walter Sisters and others, to aid and
abet the continuance of the child abuses and spousal abuses by the Walter Sisters, Tesdahl and
15
On information and belief, certain members of the board have had knowledge of the racketeering in family law
and the criminal justice system for years, but look the other way to obtain more federal funding than is deserved.
16
On information and belief, Tesdahl has ordered her staff to deny due process to hundreds of noncustodial
parents, mainly fathers, and Zehnder Fischer has maliciously prosecuted hundreds of noncustodial parents, mainly
fathers including many known to be innocent like me; to do their part in the racketeering in family law and the
criminal justice system and to martyr themselves among other hardcore militant feminist hatemongers who have
oppressed millions of American fathers and their children over the past several decades.

12
Zehnder Fischer both committed crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.05 and 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1).
92. By intentionally failing in their duties as “Mandatory Reporters,” Tesdahl and
Zehnder Fischer both committed another count under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
93. By continuing to enforce the known void ‘No Contact Order’ in case 09-786,
Zehnder Fischer committed her own child abuses against each of my children under Minn. Stat.
§ 609.25 and another stalking and harassment crime against me under 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1);
and by obviously conspiring, aiding and abetting Zehnder Fischer in her crimes against my
family, Tesdahl is also guilty of 5 counts of child abuse and another count of harassment.
CRIMES #1308-1332:
94. At 8:52pm on June 13, 2012, I discovered that First Judicial District judge M.
Michael Baxter had issued another false arrest warrant in case 09-0786, see my SECOND
SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, when the St. Peter Police Department and Nicollet
County Sheriff’s Office dispatched several officers to arrest me at my residence.
95. I immediately wrote and filed my Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protection and
Other Orders in case 12-366; and I sent cover letters, see Exhibit MN-1014, and copies of the
motion to the St. Peter Police Chief and Nicollet County Commissioners, and, when the Police
Chief hung up on me, to St. Peter City Administrator Todd Prafke.
96. At 8:20am on June 15th, I called17 the St. Peter Police Department to explain that I had
taped a copy of my Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protection and Other Orders to my
garage door and asked if they would have an officer pick it up for the Police Chief, but they
refused.
97. At 3:30pm on June 15th, I called again and talked in depth with St. Peter Police Chief
Mathew Peters to explain:
a. That I had a case here in Nicollet County to clear up the child support matters;
b. That, in addition to serving warrants, his office had a duty to investigate false warrants;
c. That I am a crime victim;
d. That many officers of the court in Le Sueur County are fixing court cases;
e. That the case fixers had now committed a crime against me in Nicollet County;
f. That my child support obligations are paid-in-full;
g. That I wanted to press full charges against the people who brought the false arrest warrant;
h. That case fixing is a serious crime;
i. That I could tell by his smartass responses that he at least knows about the case fixing;
j. That no one would pick up my motion or was concerned with the truth in the matter;
k. That I can prove that the warrant is false and void;
l. That I previously reported the crimes to Sheriff Dave Lange, who refused to investigate;
m. That I wanted to report the recent crimes against me (in Nicollet County) to him;
n. That I had several hundred pages of evidence;
o. That (in answer to his bullshit) I do not need an attorney to report the crimes to him.
98. Peters’ response to all this was to tell me that “a person who represents himself is
representing a fool”; and then he refused to write down my local case number, told me he was
not going to help me, and, when I brought up the case fixing again, he hung up on me.
99. By refusing to investigate the false arrest warrant, by refusing to apprehend the real
17
Calls recorded, but not transcribed.

13
suspects, by refusing to protect me from further harm and secure crime victim services for my
family, and by refusing to investigate and press my claims, Peters committed at least 4 counts of
criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
100. By not reporting the ongoing case fixing to a Fifth Judicial District judge, Peters
committed a state crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.50(1) and 2 federal crimes under 18 U.S.C. §§ 4
and 1512(c)(2) (included in total).
101. Usually arriving in 3 or 4 vehicles, the police and deputies returned at 4:15pm on
June 14th, at 9:43pm on June 15th (after my talk with Peters), and at 12:08pm on June 19, 2012.
102. In my June 15th letter to Prafke, I requested that he fire Peters for committing crimes
against my family and in support of the case fixers; by refusing this request, Prafke committed a
crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
103. In my June 16th letter to the Nicollet County Commissioners, I requested that they
request Lange’s resignation and if he refuses to fire him for his crimes against my family and in
support of the case fixers; by refusing this request, the Board committed another crime under
Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
104. Because the “false arrest warrant scandal” was an emergency, I demanded
adjudication of my Ex Parte Emergency Motion for Protection and Other Orders by July 6.
105. By refusing to declare Baxter’s false arrest warrant null and void, by refusing to enter
a sealed order to all Nicollet County professionals involved in my family’s cases to immediately
report any further crimes by the case fixing criminals, by refusing to enter sealed orders for the
arrests of all involved in the recent crimes and to the appropriate officials to secure all crime
victim services for my family, by refusing to enter appropriate protection orders, and by refusing
to enter sealed orders summoning a grand jury for investigation, and providing the grand jury, St.
Peter Police Department and Nicollet County Child Protection with copies of my PETITION
BOOK, MY DIVORCE, and my First Civil Complaint, judge Krehbiel committed at least 6 more
counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
106. Still trying desperately to obtain immediate relief for my family in Nicollet County,
on June 25th, I submitted my Second Civil Complaint and Ex Parte Motion for Preliminary
Orders to court administrator Carol Melick for filing in a new case; see starting on page 5 of
MN-1014, and I sent cover letters and copies of the complaint to the Commissioners and Prafke.
107. By intentionally failing to file my second complaint in a new case, Melick committed
a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); by comingling it with my first complaint, Melick
committed a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2); and by intentionally causing injury to my
property (the record in case 12-366), Melick committed a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3).
108. By intentionally failing to answer my second complaint and by intentionally failing to
intervene as Minnesota’s highest law enforcement agency in the scandal being perpetuated by
the St. Peter Police and Nicollet County Sheriff, one or more officials at the Minnesota Attorney
General’s office committed 2 counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); by
intentionally failing to settle my family’s housing and income crises, one or more officials at the
Minnesota Attorney General’s office committed a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(3); and by
knowing all about the case fixing, but intentionally ignoring my pleas as a crime victim, to do
their part in support of the case fixers’ pattern of criminal activity, one or more officials at the

14
Minnesota Attorney General’s office committed one or more counts of the crime of
racketeering18 under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
109. By refusing to adjudicate my Second Civil Complaint, Krehbiel committed another
count of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); by intentionally failing to address
my family’s housing and income crises, Krehbiel committed a crime under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(3); and by knowing all about the case fixing, but intentionally ignoring my pleas as a
crime victim to do her part in support of the case fixers’ pattern of criminal activity, Krehbiel
committed one or more counts of the crime of racketeering19 under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one
count included in total).
CRIMES #1333-1494:
110. On July 2, 2012, I was falsely arrested and imprisoned for the 7th time; see my
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.
111. On July 23, 2012, I was falsely arrested and imprisoned for the 8th time; see Exhibit
MN-1015.
112. St. Peter Police Chief Mathew Peters, who had prior knowledge that I could lawfully
resist arrest under Minnesota law and had prior knowledge that I could prove with credible
evidence that judge Baxter’s arrest warrant in case 09-786 is invalid, refused to investigate and
refused to protect me from further harm, committing 2 counts of criminal misconduct under
Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); conspired with many others on making my 7th false arrest without
probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.175; ordered his officers to terrorize
me in my home during their attempts to falsely arrest me, committing crimes under Minn. Stat.
§§ 609.17 and 609.749, subd. 2(a)(2); ordered my 7th false arrest with the intent to harm my
person, property, rights and character, committing 4 counts of criminal misconduct under Minn.
Stat. § 609.43(3); conspired with Zehnder Fischer and likely many others to falsify his officers’
reports and the criminal complaint, to cause my 8th false arrest, committing at least 6 material
frauds upon the court and at least 2 other crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.05 and 609.43(4); and
intentionally ignored my pleas as a crime victim, ignored the law, ignored his duties, and ignored
common human decency, to do his part in support of the pattern of criminal activity now known
to also exist in Nicollet County, committing one or more counts of the crime of racketeering20
under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
113. St. Peter Police Officer David Arpin, who had prior knowledge that I could lawfully
resist arrest under Minnesota law21, conspired with Peters and likely many others to make my 7th
false arrest without probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.175; was one of
the officers who terrorized me in my home during the previous attempts to falsely arrest me,
committing crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.17 and 609.749, subd. 2(a)(2); ignored my citations

18
On information and belief, there is a sizable criminal faction within the Minnesota Attorney General’s office that
is not only participating in the racketeering all around the state, but is also encouraging and orchestrating the case
fixing in family law and the criminal justice system in most if not all of Minnesota’s 87 counties.
19
On information and belief, Krehbiel has been fixing cases for years and perhaps decades and has ruined the lives
of hundreds if not thousands of criminal defendants, noncustodial parents, mainly fathers, and their children.
20
On information and belief, Peters has taken part in the false arrests of hundreds of ignorant criminal defendants
and has been on the dole for years for a portion of the cash bails extorted from victims in the criminal justice system.
21
Where an attempted arrest is unlawful, a person may resist such arrest. State v. Cantieny (1885) 34 Minn. 1, 24
N.W. 458; State v. Miller (1958) 253 Minn. 112, 91 N.W.2d 138

15
of the law onsite regarding my right to lawfully resist arrest and refused to call his superiors to
check it out, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); grabbed my arm, assaulting me
pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.224; made my 7th false arrest without probable cause and caused
my 7th false imprisonment, committing another crime (statute unknown); twisted my arm behind
my back while pushing me toward one of the approximately 9 patrol cars that showed up for the
known false arrest, assaulting me again pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.224; conspired with
Zehnder Fischer and likely many others to falsify his report, to cause my 8th false arrest,
committing fraud upon the court and at least 2 other crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.05 and
609.43(4); and is still advancing his false charges against me to do his part in the racketeering22,
which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
114. St. Peter Police Officer Michael Penning, who had prior knowledge that I could
lawfully resist arrest under Minnesota law, conspired with Peters and likely many others on
making my 7th false arrest without probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. §
609.175; was one of the officers who terrorized me in my home during the previous attempts to
falsely arrest me, committing crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.17 and 609.749, subd. 2(a)(2);
ignored my citations of the law onsite regarding my right to lawfully resist arrest and refused to
call his boss, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); tasered me in the back as I fled
from Arpin and unnecessarily tasered me two more times as I was trying to get up to unlock the
door, assaulting me 3 times in varying degrees pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.224; aided in my 7th
false arrest without probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.05; conspired
with Zehnder Fischer and likely many others to falsify his report, to cause my 8th false arrest,
committing fraud upon the court and at least 2 other crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.05 and
609.43(4); and is still advancing his false charges against me to do his part in the racketeering23,
which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
115. St. Peter Police Detective Matt Grochow, who had prior knowledge that I could
lawfully resist arrest under Minnesota law and had prior knowledge that I could prove with
credible evidence that judge Baxter’s arrest warrant is invalid, refused to investigate and refused
to protect me from further harm, committing 2 counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(1); conspired with Peters and likely many others on making my 7th false arrest without
probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.175; was one of the officers who
terrorized me in my home during the previous attempts to falsely arrest me, committing crimes
under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.17 and 609.749, subd. 2(a)(2); ignored my further citations of the law
onsite regarding my right to lawfully resist arrest and refused to stop my 7th false arrest,
committing another crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); ordered my 7th false arrest to continue
without probable cause, committing a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.05; conspired with Zehnder
Fischer and likely many others to falsify his criminal complaint, to cause my 8th false arrest,
committing at least 4 material frauds upon the court and at least 2 other crimes under Minn. Stat.
§§ 609.05 and 609.43(4); and is still advancing his false complaint against me to do his part in
the racketeering24, which is a crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.903 (one count included in total).
116. Nicollet County Sheriff Deputy Mike O’Gorman knowingly transported me to the
criminals in Le Sueur County following my 7th false arrest, committing a crime under Minn. Stat.
§ 609.43(3); acknowledged my verifiable claim that my five children and I are crime victims and
22
On information and belief, Arpin has been on the dole for years and has made many false arrests.
23
On information and belief, Penning has been on the dole for years and has made many false arrests.
24
On information and belief, Grochow has been on the dole for years and has brought many false complaints.

16
promised me that he would investigate my claims against Zehnder Fisher, Baxter, and others, by
reading my PETITION BOOK and other evidence already on the record in case 52-CV-12-366,
but later refused to investigate (see letter on page 6 of MN-1015), which is a crime under Minn.
Stat. § 609.43(1); and, having 21-years experience in law enforcement and knowledge that no
probable cause existed for this arrest or for my 8th false arrest on July 23rd, later refused to make
these important findings in both cases and refused to provide the results of his investigation,
which constitutes at least 3 more counts under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1) and which suggests that
he is also participating in the racketeering25 in Nicollet County (not included in total).
117. Fifth Judicial District Judge Allison L. Krehbiel, who not only had prior knowledge
that I could lawfully resist arrest under Minnesota law and had prior knowledge that I could
prove with credible evidence that judge Baxter’s arrest warrant in case 09-786 is invalid, but also
knew all of the facts listed above in paragraph 72 by this point, that probable cause did not exist
in either case, and that the St. Peter Police Department and Nicollet County Sheriff’s Office was
perpetuating a total fraud upon the court and against me and all citizens of Nicollet County,
which makes her complicit in at least 6 counts of fraud upon the court, conspired with Zehnder
Fischer and likely many others, and knowingly issued the false arrest warrant to start case 52-
CR-12-278, committing at least 3 crimes under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.175, 609.05, and 609.43(4);
caused my 8th false arrest and imprisonment, committing 2 more crimes (statutes unknown); and
later refused to dismiss the case, committing another crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1); all to
do her part in another racketeering scheme, which is another count for her under Minn. Stat. §
609.903 (one count included in total).
118. The other 8 individual defendants are also complicit in the crime spree to cause my 8th
false arrest and imprisonment, and should be charged accordingly.
119. Nicollet County Attorney Michelle M. Zehnder Fischer orchestrated my 7th and 8th
false arrests and imprisonments and is therefore complicit and civilly and criminally liable for
the 81 crimes alleged in this section; all of which, of course, were done to support the ongoing
racketeering26 in the Fifth Judicial District (one count of Minn. Stat. § 609.903 included in total).
CRIMES #1495-1512:
120.On July 25, 2012, I wrote to court administrator Carol Melick to return our Second
Civil Complaint; see Exhibit MN-1016.
121. By refusing to return the complaint, Melick committed a crime under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(2); and by failing to return the complaint with the intent to permanently deprive us our
property, Melick committed theft under Minn. Stat. § 609.52.
122. On July 26, 2012, judge Krehbiel entered her first and only order in case 52-CV-12-
366 with the intent to fix my family’s civil cases against us. Acting not as a judge but as an
attorney for the state, and in conspiracy with Zehnder Fischer and one or more at the Minnesota
Attorney General’s office and likely many others, Krehbiel issued her fraudulent order to
sabotage my First Civil Complaint and Second Civil Complaint in an attempt to frame me as a
25
On information and belief, O’Gorman at least knows all about the case fixing, obstruction of justice and
intentional neglect of duty in support of the racketeering, but has never reported it.
26
Evidence of Zehnder Fischer’s case fixing against my family and her theft of the $5,000.00 posted for bail in
First Judicial case 09-786 is on the record in my PETITION BOOK in Fifth Judicial case 12-366. I have a growing
list of her other victims. On information and belief, Zehnder Fischer has been fixing cases for years and has ruined
the lives of hundreds if not thousands of criminal defendants, noncustodial parents, mainly fathers, and their kids.

17
‘frivolous litigant,’ committing another fraud upon the court and at least 5 other crimes under
Minn. Stat. §§ 609.43(2), 609.05, 609.43(4), 609.17 and 609.43(3).
123. By comingling my second complaint with my first complaint, which clearly had
different plaintiffs and defendants, Krehbiel committed another fraud upon the court and another
crime under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(2).
124. On July 30, 2012, I submitted in the civil case my Ex Parte Combined Motion for
Stay of Proceedings; Motion for Recusal; and Notice of Intent to Sue, see starting on page 9
of MN-1016, and wrote to Krehbiel, court administrator Carol Melick, and chief judge Douglas
L. Richards, to give them a final opportunity to do their jobs, stop the case fixing and dismiss the
criminal case against me.
125. No one responded or dismissed the criminal case.
126. By refusing to recuse herself despite all the evidence of her biases, prejudices, and
improprieties in the case, and by refusing to recuse herself despite knowing of my intent to sue
her, Krehbiel committed 2 further counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1).
127. By refusing to dismiss the criminal case she brought against me knowing the
complainant lacked probable cause, and by refusing to dismiss the criminal complaint knowing it
is a total fraud, Krehbiel committed 2 further counts of criminal misconduct under Minn. Stat. §
609.43(1).
128. In the afternoon of August 16, I telephoned the court and was told by Deb Pfeifer:
a. That the 9:30am hearing on August 17 had not been canceled;
b. That judge Krehbiel had received my letter and combined motion, but was on vacation for
2 weeks;
c. That the motion had been filed on July 31st and she had entered it personally on the record;
d. That she was sure that judge Krehbiel would cancel the hearing in a situation like this;
e. That she understood that my bicycle was my only form of transportation, that in addition to
bicycling a few miles I would have to go somewhere to change into dress clothes, and that it would
take me over an hour to get to the courthouse;
f. That she would ask judge Krehbiel that afternoon but I could assume the hearing would be
canceled unless I heard back from her;
g. That, because of my uneasiness in assuming, I could call her the next day at 8:00am; and
h. That I could call her directly at 934-0380.
129. At 8:00am on August 17, I telephoned the court and was told by Deb Pfeifer:
a. That she had emailed judge Krehbiel and had received a response about a couple of things
but not about whether the hearing was canceled; and
b. That she would try to reach judge Krehbiel again and call me back.
130. At 9:08am on August 17, Deb Pfeifer telephoned me to tell me:
a. That judge Krehbiel had given her an answer and that if I do not appear at my 9:30am
hearing my motions would be dismissed with prejudice;
b. That she had just returned to her office and saw the message;
c. That she didn’t recall telling me the day before that I could assume the hearing would be
canceled;
d. That I was somehow to blame for her late call and rudeness; and
e. I told her I would appear but would be late, but she did not hear because she had hung up.

18
 131. I telephoned Deb Pfeifer right back and was told:
a. That I hung up on her;
b. That she understood that it would be about 11:00am when I could get there;
c. That judge Krehbiel just happened to have an opening on her schedule at 11:00am; and
d. That my case was now scheduled at 11:00am.
132. About a mile-and-a-half into town, I got a flat tire on my bicycle and walked back to
the place where I was staying at the time.
133. At 10:21am on August 17, I telephoned the court and was told by Deb Pfeifer:
a. That she understood that there was no way I could make it to the hearing;
b. That she understood that, on the walk back with my bike, I had a chance to reflect on all
that had happened in the case;
c. That she would pass along my message to judge Krehbiel: That judge Kriebiel should not
schedule another hearing because she has no authority to make any decisions in the case and the
case has been transferred to a higher authority, and that it would be best for both of us if she went
ahead with her threat to dismiss the case with prejudice because I am planning to file civil and
criminal complaints against her;
d. That judge Krehbiel has to issue some kind of order;
e. That she understands that I do not want judge Krehbiel to issue another order in the case, as
she has sabotaged it enough;
f. I learned that she found my family’s crisis and my warnings laughable;
g. That she will bring it to judge Krehbiel’s attention that, if she needs to enter a final order in
the case, she should state that it has come to her attention that she has no authority to make any
further decisions in the case; and
h. That she understood that I would also be reporting her trickery earlier that morning in her
attempt to cause me to miss my hearing.
134. By threatening harm to my family’s property (the records in our cases) by dismissing
the case with prejudice, Krehbiel committed the crime of coercion under Minn. Stat. § 609.27.
135. By orchestrating the crime spree described in this section, Krehbiel committed one or
more counts of harassment and oppression under Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1) and
another count of racketeering under Minn. Stat. § 609.903.
136. By knowing full well that my child support obligations are paid-in-full and that the
Colorado child support order is fictitious, but purposely fixing the case to keep the child support
scam going, Krehbiel committed a Class B federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 514.
137. Based on my dealings with Melick and conversations with Pfeifer, I believe they and
others in court administration are involved in the racketeering, but will wait to report them until
others in town confirm my beliefs as true.
138. Based on my dealings with the female defendants named in this and previous actions
and to be named in future actions, I believe that there is widespread discrimination, case fixing,
and hate crimes against men taking place in the First and Fifth Judicial Districts of Minnesota.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
EXECUTED this 23rd Day of August 2012. ______________________________

19
 By Affiant: John M. Hentges
DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
139. Under the circumstances detailed in the foregoing Affidavit, all of my previous
requests and assertions of rights over the past 5 years in behalf of my family are now demands:
DEMAND #1 - To the Justices of the Supreme Court: Establishment of Original Jurisdiction,
Transfer of All Cases, and Adjudication of All Cases:
140. There is absolutely no doubt that judge Baxter is running an illegitimate court in Le
Sueur County and judge Krehbiel is running an illegitimate court in Nicollet County; and,
because of my evidence of their case fixing, both corrupt judges will continue attacking me until
you exercise your supervisory powers.
141. If you have not already established original jurisdiction27 at the Supreme Court and
transferred my First Judicial District cases 40-FA-07-1253 and 40-CR-09-786, please do so
immediately, as the case fixing has continued.
142. Because, as this complaint proves, my family’s cases and the state’s case against me
in the Fifth Judicial District are being fixed too, transfer cases 52-CV-12-366 and 52-CR-12-278.
143. Dismiss cases 40-CR-09-786 and 52-CR-12-278 immediately to end the crime sprees
in both districts.
144. Pronounce default judgment in my favor in case 52-CV-12-366 (First Civil
Compliant) and in my family’s favor in our Second Civil Compliant, and immediately order
payment by the state of the monetary relief and fulfillment of all other relief requested.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand immediate
establishment of original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court, at least until We the People get our
courts back in the First and Fifth Judicial Districts; I demand immediate transfer of all my cases
in both districts to the Supreme Court; I demand immediate dismissal of both criminal cases
against me; and I demand immediate and complete adjudication of my civil actions, including
payment by the state of the monetary relief requested in the total amount of $891,536.00
($78,536.00+750,000.00+63,000.00), the declaratory relief requested, and a clearance letter so
that I can obtain a driver’s license; together with such other and further sua sponte relief deemed
reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #2 - To the Executive and/or Judicial Branches: One or More State Grand Juries
and Special Prosecutors:
145. In my previous complaints, I demanded county grand juries, but now believe that the
case fixers will try to influence their investigations.

27
See endnote ix in CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.

20
 146. I now think that state grand juries should be convened and special prosecutors
appointed in St. Paul, at least to start, until We the People get our local courts back.
147. As soon as the first grand jury is summoned, I would like to present my initial
complaints and evidence and have my other victims (see paragraph 98 in my CONFIDENTIAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT) present their complaints and evidence around that same time.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand the immediate
summoning of one or more state grand juries and appointment of special prosecutors in St. Paul,
and sufficient time with the first grand jury to present my complaints and evidence and have my
other victims present their complaints and evidence around that same time; together with such
other and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #3 - To the Grand Juries and the Supreme Court: Indictments and Immediate
Arrests of the Worst of the Offenders:
148. The ‘worst of the offenders’ named in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT,
see paragraph 97, should be immediately indicted and arrested.
149. Because of their more recent crimes, I add Fifth Judicial District Judge Allison L.
Krehbiel and St. Peter Police Chief Mathew Peters to the list.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand the immediate
indictments and arrests of the now 12 ‘worst of the offenders’; together with such other and
further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances
DEMAND #4 - To the Grand Juries and All 3 Branches: Investigation of the Attorney
General’s office, the County Commissioners in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties, and the Other
State and Local Offices Involved in the Racketeering:
150. On information and belief, there are criminal factions within our Attorney General’s
office, Boards of County Commissioners, and other state and local offices, all around the state,
who are on the dole and/or otherwise participating in the racketeering in family law and the
criminal justice system to increase their federal funding.
151. The grand juries and all 3 branches of Minnesota government should conduct an
ongoing investigation starting with the offices that have harmed my family and other victims.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family and the other victims
named in my previous complaints and who step forward along the way, I demand ongoing
investigations by the grand juries and all 3 branches to identify and appropriately charge the
officials at the Minnesota Attorney General’s office, the county commissioners, and the other
local and state officials participating in the racketeering; together with such other and further sua
sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
DEMAND #5 - To All 3 Branches: Terminations of Employment, Removals from Office,
Banishments from Our Government, Disbarments, and Impeachments:
152. All individual defendants employed by our government should be immediately fired,
removed from office and banned from ever holding another government position.
153. Zehnder Fischer, Krehbiel, Richards, one or more at the Attorney General’s office,
and anyone else involved and licensed to practice law, should be disbarred.

21
 154. Krehbiel should be impeached.
WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, in behalf of my family, I demand the immediate
and appropriate terminations of employment, removals from office, and banishments from our
government of all individual defendants in this action; I demand the disbarments of Zehnder
Fischer, Krehbiel, Richards, one or more at the Attorney General’s office, and anyone else
involved and licensed to practice law; and I demand Krehbiel’s impeachment; together with such
other and further sua sponte relief deemed reasonable and just under the circumstances.
IN CONCLUSION:
155. I DO NOT expect that every crime I allege will be prosecuted, but I DO expect you to
immediately end the crime spree and arrest the worst of the offenders, and immediately protect
my family from further harm, remedy our housing and income crises as requested in my Second
Civil Complaint, and arrange for me to obtain a driver’s license and a reliable vehicle.
156. Please start somewhere and help my family.
DATED this 23rd Day of August 2012. ______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 23rd Day of August 2012, to save on postage because I am indigent, I
mailed two true and correct copies of the foregoing Third Supplemental Criminal Complaint
to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver one copy directly to Minnesota Supreme Court Chief
Justice Lorie S. Gildea. Thank you.)
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
(Please immediately hand-deliver one copy directly to Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt
Zellers, in Office 463 of the State Office Building. Thank you.)

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

22
i
Summary of the main Minnesota crimes committed against my family:
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE.
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided
by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than
$3,000, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of office or
employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or
knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other’s
person, property, or rights; or
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like
document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
609.05 LIABILITY FOR CRIMES OF ANOTHER. Subdivision 1. Aiding, abetting; liability.
A person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires,
counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.
609.17 ATTEMPTS. Subdivision 1. Crime defined.
Whoever, with the intent to commit a crime, does an act which is a substantial step toward, and more than
preparation for, the commission of the crime is guilty of an attempt to commit that crime...
609.175 CONSPIRACY. Subdivision 1. To cause arrest or prosecution.
Whoever conspires with another to cause a third person to be arrested or prosecuted on a criminal charge knowing
the charge to be false is guilty of a misdemeanor.
609.27 COERCION. Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever orally or in writing makes any of the following threats and thereby causes another against the other's will
to do any act or forbear doing a lawful act is guilty of coercion and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 2:
(1) a threat to unlawfully inflict bodily harm upon, or hold in confinement, the person threatened or another,
when robbery or attempt to rob is not committed thereby; or
(2) a threat to unlawfully inflict damage to the property of the person threatened or another; or
(3) a threat to unlawfully injure a trade, business, profession, or calling; or
(4) a threat to expose a secret or deformity, publish a defamatory statement, or otherwise to expose any
person to disgrace or ridicule; or
(5) a threat to make or cause to be made a criminal charge, whether true or false; provided, that a warning of
the consequences of a future violation of law given in good faith by a peace officer or prosecuting
attorney to any person shall not be deemed a threat for the purposes of this section.
609.275 ATTEMPT TO COERCE.
Whoever makes a threat within the meaning of section 609.27, subdivision 1, clauses, (1) to (5), but fails to cause
the intended act or forbearance, commits an attempt to coerce and may be punished as provided in section 609.17.
609.48 PERJURY.
Subdivision 1. Acts constituting.
Whoever makes a false material statement not believing it to be true in any of the following cases is guilty of
perjury and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 4:
(1) in or for an action, hearing or proceeding of any kind in which the statement is required or authorized by
law to be made under oath or affirmation; or
(2) in any writing which is required or authorized by law to be under oath or affirmation; or
(3) in any other case in which the penalties for perjury are imposed by law and no specific sentence is
otherwise provided.
609.50 OBSTRUCTING LEGAL PROCESS OR ARREST.
(1) obstructs, hinders, or prevents the lawful execution of any legal process, civil or criminal, or apprehension
of another on a charge or conviction of a criminal offense.
609.515 MISCONDUCT OF JUDICIAL OR HEARING OFFICER.
Whoever does any of the following…is guilty of a misdemeanor:
(1) Being a judicial or hearing officer, does either of the following:

23
 (a) agrees with or promises another to determine a cause or controversy or issue pending or to be brought
before the officer for or against any party; or
(b) intentionally obtains or receives and uses information relating thereto contrary to the regular course of
the proceeding.
(2) Induces a judicial or hearing officer to act contrary to the provisions of this section.
609.52 THEFT. Subd. 2. Acts constituting theft
(1) intentionally and without claim of right takes, uses, transfers, conceals or retains possession of movable
property of another without the other’s consent and with intent to deprive the owner permanently of
possession of the property …
Subd. 3. Sentence
(2) to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both, if
the value of the property or services stolen exceeds $5,000 …
609.7475 FRAUDULENT OR OTHERWISE IMPROPER FINANCING STATEMENTS.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
As used in this section, "record" has the meaning given in section 336.9-102.
Subd. 2. Crime described.
A person who:
(2) presents for filing or causes to be presented for filing a record with the intent that it be used to harass or
defraud any other person;
is guilty of a crime and may be sentenced as provided in subdivision 3.
609.749 HARASSMENT; STALKING; PENALTIES.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
As used in this section, "harass" means to engage in intentional conduct which:
(1) the actor knows or has reason to know would cause the victim under the circumstances to feel frightened,
threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated; and
(2) causes this reaction on the part of the victim.
Subd. 1a. No proof of specific intent required.
In a prosecution under this section, the state is not required to prove that the actor intended to cause the victim to
feel frightened, threatened, oppressed, persecuted, or intimidated, or except as otherwise provided in subdivision 3,
paragraph (a), clause (4), or paragraph (b), that the actor intended to cause any other result.
Subd. 2. Harassment and stalking crimes.
(a) A person who harasses another by committing any of the following acts is guilty of a gross misdemeanor:
(1) directly or indirectly manifests a purpose or intent to injure the person, property, or rights of another by
the commission of an unlawful act.
609.765 CRIMINAL DEFAMATION.
Subdivision 1. Definition.
Defamatory matter is anything which exposes a person or a group, class or association to hatred, contempt,
ridicule, degradation or disgrace in society, or injury to business or occupation.
Subd. 2. Acts constituting.
Whoever with knowledge of its defamatory character orally, in writing or by any other means, communicates any
defamatory matter to a third person without the consent of the person defamed is guilty of criminal defamation and
may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or
both.
609.903 RACKETEERING.
Subdivision 1. Crime.
A person is guilty of racketeering if the person:
(1) is employed by or associated with an enterprise [or governmental entity] and intentionally conducts or
participates in the affairs of the enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity;
Penalty.
A person convicted of violating section 609.903 may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 20 years or
to payment of a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both.
ii
Summary of the main federal crimes committed against my family:
18 U.S.C. § 514 - Fictitious obligations:

24
 (a) Whoever, with the intent to defraud – (1) draws, prints, processes, produces, publishes, or otherwise makes, or
attempts or causes the same, within the United States; (2) passes, utters, presents, offers, brokers, issues, sells, or
attempts or causes the same, or with like intent possesses, within the United States; or (3) utilizes interstate or
foreign commerce, including use of the mails or wire, radio, or other electronic communication, to transmit,
transport, ship, move, transfer, or attempts or causes the same, to, from, or through the United States, any false or
fictitious instrument, document, or other item appearing, representing, purporting, or contriving through scheme or
artifice, to be an actual security or other financial instrument issued under the authority of the United States, a
foreign government, a State or other political subdivision of the United States, or an organization, shall be guilty of
a class B felony.
CHAPTER 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS.
18 U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of felony
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony … and does not as soon as possible make known
to some judge or other person in civil or military authority … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than three years, or both.
CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS.
18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State … in the free exercise or enjoyment
of any right or privilege … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
Whoever, under color of any law … willfully subjects any person in any State … to the deprivation of any rights
… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
18 U.S.C. § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant
(c) Whoever corruptly--
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

25
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims John M. Hentges and his five children),
Plaintiffs,

v. FIRST ADDENDUM
TO THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

DOUGLAS L. RICHARDS,
ALLISON L. KREHBIEL,
MICHELLE M. ZEHNDER FISCHER,
CAROL MELICK,
Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant, individually and in behalf of my five children, bring this
first addendum to my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated August 23, 2012,
confidentially1, against the above-named defendants for their continued crimes against my
family, and state:
THIS FIRST ADDENDUM IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
NOTICE TO THE OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE CLERK: Please file this criminal complaint, and my
previous criminal complaints, and hand-deliver them directly to Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. DO NOT provide
copies of any of my family’s pleadings, or allow access to our files, to Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules, Court
of Appeals Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson, or any other official, without my permission.

1
 AFFIDAVIT
1. Because of your failure to intervene, as Minnesota’s highest leaders, and dismiss case
52-CR-12-278 and take other appropriate action when you received my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated August 23, 2012, Fifth Judicial District Judge Allison L.
Krehbiel, Nicollet County Attorney Michelle Zehnder Fischer2, and Court Administrator Carol
Melick, have continued their crime spree against my family.
2. Fifth Judicial District Chief Judge Douglas L. Richards is named in this complaint
because I forgot to allege his specific crimes in my third criminal complaint and because he has
done nothing to end the crime spree, which makes him complicit in its continuance.
3. On July 6, 2012, judge Krehbiel had knowingly issued a false arrest warrant against
me in Nicollet County starting a new criminal case against me (CR-12-278) - see my THIRD
SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT; this was just part of Krehbiel’s effort to sabotage my
civil case, 52-CV-12-366, which was set up for my First Civil Complaint and sought to resolve
the child support matters once-and-for-all, because she knew that Zehnder Fischer would be in
trouble and the case fixing would be exposed if I was successful obtaining a finding and
declaration that my child support obligations are paid-in-full.
4. On August 30, 2012, Krehbiel backdated her “Order of Dismissal” to August 27th in
case CV-12-366, see Exhibit MN-2004, and had Melick mail me a copy of the order, see
postmark on envelope on page 4.
5. On information and belief, on August 27, Krehbiel intercepted and read my
confidential package to judge Todd Westphal in case CR-12-278, see Exhibit MN-2005, which
contained my Ex Parte Motion to Dismiss, see pages 3-5, found out that I was bringing
criminal complaints against her, and instructed Melick to reschedule judge Westphal’s omnibus
hearing and send the Notice of Hearing to my public defender Tom Dunnwald, see page 6.
6. Krehbiel’s Order of Dismissal in case CV-12-366 evidences many things including:
a. That she comingled my Second Civil Complaint with my First Civil Complaint [for
which case CV-12-366 was set up], and re-captioned the case - from the first to the second - so she
could attempt to frame me as a ‘frivolous litigant,’ which is one of the common case fixing tactics
employed by corrupt judges all across the United States to attack their victims when they complain;
b. That she, like her case fixing colleagues in the First Judicial District, is not following the
law at all and will do practically anything to leave the child support matters unresolved;
c. That she admits in her order3 that she knows she is not following the law, which therefore
automatically renders her orders void, but then goes ahead and dismisses the case anyway, and tops
it all off by fraudulently stating that her decision is based on my “failure to prosecute” knowing full

2
Zehnder Fischer is also the prosecutor in case 40-CR-09-786 and is involved in the crime spree in the First
Judicial District - see my SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT and its addendums.
3
In the first paragraph, Krehbiel admits to acting as an attorney for the state by “directing Court Administration
to set a hearing to address whether Plaintiff should be deemed a frivolous litigant,” which is especially
shocking when considering that the case was uncontested by the state and no one brought a motion to show cause or
anything - Krehbiel just invented the frivolous issue on her own, I guess, in an attempt to martyr herself among the
other case fixing criminals. Krehbiel mentioned my ex parte combined motion in the second paragraph to make it
appear that it would be heard at the August 17th hearing, I guess, while I was being framed as a frivolous litigant [I
am unsure whether Krehbiel or Zehnder Fischer intended to do the framing]. In the third paragraph, Krehbiel admits
that neither of the defendants [my wife nor the state of Minnesota] was notified of the frame-up hearing. In the fourth
paragraph, Krehbiel admits to knowing of my claim that she lacked authority to issue any orders in the case.

2
 well that the state failed to defend4 and therefore I had won the case by default in June;
d. That she and Melick have continued to conspire to harm me and my cases by backdating
orders, by copying orders to Zehnder Fischer who they both know has harmed my family
enormously, by opening my confidential mail to judge Westphal (which is the only way they could
have gotten my P.O. Box), by interfering in case CR-12-278, and other case fixing tactics;
e. That she and Zehnder Fischer intend to keep operating their illegitimate court in the Fifth
Judicial District despite my knowledge of, and evidence of, their case fixing;
f. That she and Zehnder Fischer will continue interfering in and sabotaging my family’s
actions despite their automatic disqualification;
g. That she has allowed and will continue to allow Zehnder Fischer access to my civil case
and to receive copies of my pleadings and her orders despite knowing from the evidence in my
PETITION BOOK that Zehnder Fischer committed several very serious crimes against me while she
was maliciously prosecuting me for ‘nonsupport’ of my children knowing all along that my child
support obligations are paid-in-full; despite knowing from the start that Zehnder Fischer had
procured a “No Contact Order” by fraud in First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786 and was
continuing to enforce the void order to prevent me from talking to my 5 children, including my 2
adult children, which not only violates my children’s rights and my rights, but also Colorado 5,
Minnesota6, and federal7 law; and despite knowing, and seeming to ‘get-off’ on8, the fact that my
kids and I haven’t seen each other for over 5 years and haven’t talked to each other for over 4 years;
h. That the Order of Dismissal is automatically void by operation of law.
7. The unexplained rescheduling of the omnibus hearing and other things in case CR-12-
278 evidence many more things including:
a. That Krehbiel, although knowing that the charges brought by the St. Peter police and
Zehnder Fischer are bogus, that her arrest warrant is automatically void, that she was removed from
the case, and that I gave her an opportunity to dismiss the charges and avoid my civil and criminal

4
The corrupt Minnesota Attorney General’s office has never responded to my complaints and didn’t even answer
my First Civil Complaint; Krehbiel knows full well that I won case CV-12-366 by default and am entitled to all the
relief demanded, including a judicial finding and declaration that my child support obligations are paid-in-full.
5
For one: Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) 14-10-124 (emphasis added):
(1) Legislative declaration. The general assembly finds and declares that it is in the best interest of all parties to
encourage frequent and continuing contact between each parent and the minor children of the marriage after the
parents have separated or dissolved their marriage. In order to effectuate this goal, the general assembly urges
parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child-rearing and to encourage the love, affection, and contact
between the children and the parents.
6
For one: The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines do not allow a No Contact Order in child support
matters:
(The first paragraph): “The purpose of the sentencing guidelines is to establish rational and consistent sentencing
standards which reduce sentencing disparity and ensure that sanctions following conviction of a felony are
proportional to the severity of the offense of conviction and the extent of the offender's criminal history. Equity in
sentencing requires (a) that convicted felons similar with respect to relevant sentencing criteria ought to receive
similar sanctions, and (b) that convicted felons substantially different from a typical case with respect to relevant
criteria ought to receive different sanctions.”
7
For one: Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (emphasis added):
(Citizenship defined - privileges of citizens) …No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the
privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or
property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the
laws.
8
Krehbiel shares the same attitudes and sentiments of the other hardcore militant feminist hatemongers who have
seized control of and are racketeering in our local and state government offices: That, if I will not pay my child
support again (so their offices can receive federal funding), I will never see my children again.

3
 claims against her, is still directing the case and is still conspiring with Zehnder Fischer and the
other case fixing criminals to continue prosecuting me under the false charges;
b. That Zehnder Fischer, although knowing that she was automatically disqualified from this
case just as she was in First Judicial District case 40-CR-09-786, is refusing to step down again and
is obviously intending to maliciously prosecute me again on known false charges;
c. That Krehbiel’s Order of Dismissal in case CV-12-366 and Melick’s Notice of Hearing in
case CR-12-278, both dated on the same day and both copied to Zehnder Fischer, is much more
than just a coincidence; it is another act to fix the cases against me and should, by itself, result in
the immediate arrests of all involved;
d. That Melick will do whatever the case fixers tell her to do, even if she knows it is wrong
and will hurt children.
CRIMES #1513-1554:
8. In addition to the 1512 crimes against my family by Fifth Judicial officials and
Nicollet County residents alleged in my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, the
defendants in this action committed the following further crimes:
a. By refusing to recuse herself from case CV-12-366, Krehbiel committed another count of
criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1);
b. By issuing her Order of Dismissal in case CV-12-366, Krehbiel committed further crimes
under Minn. Stat. §§ 609.43(2) knowing that she lacks authority in the case; 609.43(3) knowing that
she is causing further injury to me and my property [the case records]; 609.43(4) knowing that the
order is false in several material respects; 609.749, subd. 2(a)(1) knowing that the order will further
the harassment against me and the oppression against my family; 609.903 knowing that she is
committing another act of case fixing in the Fifth Judicial District’s pattern of criminal activity; and
another count of a class B federal felony under 18 U.S.C. § 514 knowing that the void and fictitious
child support order and arrears balance will be further processed and enforced in Minnesota;
c. By refusing to disqualify herself from case CV-12-366 and from case CR-12-278, Zehnder
Fischer committed 2 more counts of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1);
d. By conspiring, inducing, agreeing, and using false information on the record in case CV-
12-366 and/or case CR-12-278 to commit further crimes against me, Krehbiel and Zehnder Fischer
committed at least one further count each of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.05; 609.17; 609.515; and 609.903;
e. By going along with the continued case fixing by Krehbiel and Zehnder Fischer, Melick
committed at least another count of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43;
f. By refusing to step in as the chief judge and stop the continued case fixing in the Fifth
Judicial District and crime spree against my family, Douglas L. Richards committed, at the very
least, another count of criminal misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1) [If the grand jury
finds that Richards is involved or even just knowingly looking the other way, he should be held
complicit and liable for all of the crimes of his employees].
9. Richards’ previous crimes that I forgot to allege in my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT are:
a. By refusing to step in as the chief judge and stop the case fixing in the Fifth Judicial
District and crime spree against my family, Richards committed, at the very least, an act of criminal
misconduct under Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1);
b. By failing to respond to my letter about the case fixing and by failing to dismiss case CR-
12-278 under the circumstances, Richards committed, at the very least, 2 more counts of criminal
misconduct pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 609.43(1);
c. By conspiring with or advising the case fixing criminals in his district that it is okay to
continue their case fixing and to continue harming my family, Richards committed a crime under
Minn. Stat. § 609.05, and is criminally liable for his employees’ crimes under Minn. Stat. §§

4
 609.43; 609.05; 609.17; 609.175; 609.27; 609.275; 609.48; 609.50; 609.515; 609.52; 609.7475;
609.749; 609.765; 609.903; and any other state crimes found by the grand juries; and is criminally
liable for his employees’ crimes under 18 U.S.C. §§ 514, 4, 241, 242, 1512, and any other federal
crimes found by the grand juries [counted as 20 crimes total; but may be much higher in actuality]
10. Like my SECOND ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT, this complaint is very important: If any one of these defendants is charged with
any one of their crimes, the crime spree against my family will end.
11. As soon as the first grand jury is summoned, the grand jurors will be able to indict the
case fixers; but until then, one of the justices will have to verify9 probable cause of at least one of
their crimes to justify the immediate arrest warrants.
FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, verify under penalty
of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 19th Day of September 2012. ______________________________

By Affiant: John M. Hentges

DEMANDS
THESE DEMANDS ARE DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton;
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach;
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers; and
Any other Minnesota public official charged with duties to carry out my demands.
DEMANDS: Immediate Arrests and Fulfillment of Previous Demands:
12. Because evidence establishing probable cause of several of the defendants’ crimes
was attached to my THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, Krehbiel, Zehnder
Fischer, Lange, Peters, Melick, Tesdahl, at the very least, should have already been arrested.
13. Because you, Minnesota’s highest authorities, now know for a fact that my five
children and I are victims of several very serious crimes, all of my previous demands in my
previous criminal complaints should have already been fulfilled.
14. Your negligence in protecting my family can mean only one thing.
15. If by September 30, 2012, Krehbiel, Zehnder Fischer, Lange, Peters, Melick, Tesdahl,
and the others previously named as the ‘worst of the offenders,’ are not arrested, or any of my
other demands in my criminal complaints are not fulfilled, I will assume that you, Minnesota’s
highest authorities, and/or your offices, are involved or are willfully neglecting your duties.

9
No further investigation is needed to establish probable cause of most of Zehnder Fischer’s crimes in the First
Judicial District, as sufficient evidence was attached to my PETITION BOOK (2 copies of which are already at the
Supreme Court) and sufficient evidence to prove probable cause of many of the crimes of the other Fifth Judicial
District defendants is attached to my recent criminal complaints.

5
 WHEREFORE, having sufficient grounds, as a citizen of the state of Minnesota and as a
crime victim, and having provided ample evidence establishing probable cause of one or more
crimes against my family by the defendants, I DEMAND the immediate arrest of Krehbiel,
Zehnder Fischer, Lange, Peters, Melick, and Tesdahl, and fulfillment of all of my other demands
in my criminal complaints to date10 no later than September 30, 2012.

DATED this 19th Day of September 2012.

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim and affiant John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1746 that, on this 19th Day of September 2012, I mailed true and correct copies of the
foregoing First Addendum to First Supplemental Criminal Complaint to:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Office of the Appellate Clerk
FOR: Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
305 Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges

10
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 14, 2012;
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 27, 2012;
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 23, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 28, 2012.

6
 STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT
______________________________________________________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA,

(for victims of government abuse in Le Sueur and Nicollet Counties),

Plaintiffs,

v. NOTICE1

TRAITORS,

Defendants.

I, John M. Hentges, victim and affiant in my CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT dated

July 14, 2012, and in eight subsequent criminal complaints to date, individually and in behalf of
my five children and in behalf of other victims of government abuse in Le Sueur and Nicollet
Counties and elsewhere in Minnesota, hereby serve NOTICE upon Minnesota’s highest leaders
of my intent to bring civil and criminal complaints against you and/or your offices if you do not
fulfill my demands by September 30, 2012.
THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

1
NOTICE TO THE OFFICE OF THE APPELLATE CLERK: Please file this NOTICE with my criminal
complaints and hand-deliver it directly to Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea. DO NOT provide copies of this notice or
any of my family’s pleadings, or allow access to our files, to Commissioner Rita Coyle DeMeules, Court of Appeals
Chief Judge Matthew E. Johnson, or any other official, without my permission.

1
 NOTICE
1. Because evidence establishing probable cause of several very serious crimes against
my family was attached to my criminal complaints, the ‘worst of the offenders’ so-named in my
complaints and several others involved in the case fixing should have already been arrested.
2. Because all of you - Minnesota’s highest authorities: Minnesota Governor Mark
Dayton and your office; Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea and your office;
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach and your office; and Minnesota
Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers and your office - now know for a fact that my five children
and I are victims of several very serious crimes, all of my previous demands in my criminal
complaints to date2 should have already been fulfilled.
3. You have had plenty of time to secure crime victim and witness protection services
for my family, convene one or more grand juries, appoint one or more special prosecutors,
administratively and judicially find and declare that my child support obligations are paid-in-full
(which will, by itself, end the crime spree against my family), provide a “clearance letter” so I
can obtain a driver’s license, and accomplish the other things that my family is entitled to and
that I demanded in my criminal complaints.
4. Your negligence in protecting my family from further harm can mean only one thing.
5. If by September 30, 2012, Zehnder Fischer, Baxter, Perkins, Lynch, Christian,
Moran, Lea, Kraemer, Doherty, Lange, DeMeules, Krehbiel, Peters, Melick, Tesdahl, and the
others intimately involved in the case fixing, are not arrested; or, if any of my demands in my
criminal complaints to date are not fulfilled, I will assume that you, Minnesota’s highest
authorities, and/or your offices, are involved or are willfully neglecting your duties in support of
the case fixing, and I will be bringing civil and criminal complaints against you.
6. FOR THE LAST TIME: Please help my suffering family.

DATED this 19th Day of September 2012.

______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges
P.O. Box 435
St. Peter, MN 56082
Ph: 507-351-5846

2
CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 14, 2012;
FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated July 27, 2012;
SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 3, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 11, 2012;
THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 23, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated August 28, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated Sept. 19, 2012;
SECOND ADDENDUM TO SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated Sept. 19, 2012;
FIRST ADDENDUM TO THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, dated Sept. 19, 2012.

2
 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAIL

I, victim John M. Hentges, hereby certify under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746
that, on this 19th Day of September 2012, I served by mail true and correct copies of the
foregoing NOTICE upon:
Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
Office of the Appellate Clerk
FOR: Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Lorie S. Gildea
305 Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota President of the Senate Michelle L. Fischbach
Capitol Building - Room 226
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
Minnesota Speaker of the House Kurt Zellers
State Office Building - Office 463
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155
______________________________
By Victim: John M. Hentges