C100339-Causal Analysis and Preventive Action-18JAN20110

Causal Analysis and Preventive action
PSPF014_3.10
General Tips & Information for using this form
General Guidelines:
1. Enable the macros before using this workbook.
2.Cells highlighted in blue are editable and for the remaining cells users are requested to select it from the drop down list box.
3. If the data is huge, just extend the drop down list box in respective columns and cells across the sheets.
Title and Revision History:

This sheet captures the revision history.
CAR Data - Defects:
1. This sheet is to capture project details and the consolidated information of Defects detected in Reviews & Testing both Internal, External and Customer
as well as details of analysis carried out based on the Causal Analysis Meeting .
Note :-a) The defect data is captured for the period and this sheet can be used at Project Level and as well as at OU Level.
b) Projects using PMSmart or any other Client Specific tool for defect Tracking by exporting it in excel format and copy the defect data details in this
sheet.
c) Projects not using any tool needs to manually enter the defect data details in this sheet.
2. Projects should fill the Project Code, Project Name and other mandatory details from Row 4 to Row 13
3. User has to select the Project Type/LCM from the drop down list box.
4. Enter the Defect ID under Serial Number and period From date and To date for the consolidated defect data and it is required for generating the trend
charts.
5. At OU Level, capture the Project Code details since this is mandatory field and at Project level this Column is not required.
6. Work Product and Description are Optional fields can be used while tracking individual defects.
7. Based on the selection of LCM from User, the applicable phases along with appropriate defect types would get listed in the drop down. Select the Source
and appropriate defect types.
8. Project while tracking individual defects based on severity can enter the defect count in respective Columns K,L,M or else enter the count of Defects for
the applicable defect types
9. For each defect type identify appropriate causes based on 5-Why Analysis and select the Root Cause from the drop down list in Column T
10. Analysis (Coumn U) Optional field is provided to document the outcome of the analysis.
11. Plan for Corrective Action & update the same in the Corrective Action column.
12. Plan for Preventive Action & update the same in the Preventive Action column.
13. Actions planned should be tracked to closure and status updated accordingly.
14. Once status is closed, effectiveness of the action taken should be evaluated based on the criteria defined for evaluation.Defects for which Corrective
and Preventive actions are taken and closed, enter the description with measurable quantifiable data proving the effectiveness. For instance :- In case of
effort or schedule variation in project, after the CAPA is taken the project has zero effort or schedule slippage.
Defect type & phase Summary Prj :

1. This sheet the summarizes the defect type count entered in CAR Data - Defects sheet specific for a project
2. Depending on the LCM selected in CAR Data - Defects,when the user manually selects the defect types for respective Phase-wise. A summary report
with the total defect counts based on defect types Vs phase-wise gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect
type in this sheet since this is organization wide defect type list.
Defect type & phase Summary(OU) :

1. This sheet the summarizes the defect type count entered in CAR Data - Defects sheet specific for an OU
2. Depending on the data entered in CAR Data - Defects for an OU, A summary report with the total defect counts based on defect types Vs phase-wise
gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect type in this sheet since this is organization wide defect type list.
Defect Cause & phase Summary Prj :

1. This sheet the summarizes the defect Cause count entered in CAR Data - Defects sheet specific for a project
2. Depending on the LCM selected in CAR Data - Defects,when the user manually selects the defect causes for respective Phase-wise. A summary report
with the total defect counts based on defect Causes Vs phase-wise gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect
Cause in this sheet since this is organization wide defect cause list.
Defect Cause & phase Summary(OU) :

1. This sheet the summarizes the defect Cause count entered in CAR Data - Defects sheet specific for an OU
2. Depending on the data ented in CAR Data - Defects for an OU, A summary report with the total defect counts based on defect causes Vs phase-wise
gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect cause in this sheet since this is organization wide defect cause list.
CAR Data - NCs & Issues:

1. This sheet is very similar to the CAR Data - Defects sheet except for the difference that this sheet will have all the other issues, non-conformances,
customer feedback, and everything apart from defects.
2 This sheet has similar columns as in CAR Data - Defects. Enter the NC/Issue ID under Serial Number and period From date and To date for the consolidated NC/Issue data
and it is required for generating the trend charts.
3 Project while tracking individual NC/Issue enter the Total count in Column H if required.
4. For each NC/Issue Type identify the appropriate causes based on 5-Why Analysis and select the Root Cause from the drop down list in Column L.
5. Analysis (Coumn M) Optional field is provided to document the outcome of the analysis.
6. Plan for Correction, Implement & update the same in the Correction column.
HCLT Confidential 1 of 75
Causal Analysis and Preventive action
PSPF014_3.10
10. Once status is closed, effectiveness of the action taken should be evaluated based on the criteria defined for evaluation.
CAR Data - Metrics

1 This sheet is used for tracking Metrics variation and its preventive / corrective action.
2. For such variations, identify the appropriate causes
3. Do root cause analysis & document the outcome of the analysis.
4. Plan for Correction, implement & update the same in the Correction column.
8. Once status is closed, effectiveness of the action taken should be evaluated based on the criteria defined for evaluation.
Defect Type_Trend
This sheet projects the consolidated Defect count typewise injected across various phases over a period. This pictorial representation would be significant in determing the
major defect type contributor and generate charts
Defect Cause_Trend
This sheet projects the consolidated Defect count causewise injected across various phases over a period. his pictorial representation would be significant in determing the
major defect cause contributor and generate charts
NC & Issue Type_Trend

This sheet projects the consolidated NC & Issue count typewise injected across various phases over a period. This pictorial representation would be significant in determing
the major NC & Issue type contributor and generate charts
NC & Issue Cause_Trend

This sheet projects the consolidated NC & Issue count causewise injected across various phases over a period. his pictorial representation would be significant in determing
the major NC & Issue cause contributor and generate charts
Fishbone:
1. Ishikawa Fish Bone Diagram helps in identifying the further direct and indirect parameters contributing to the identified cause. Addressing of these further
parameters can help in reducing the impact of the cause and thus helping in reduction of defect rate.
5-Why Analysis:
1.This template is to be used only for the identified causes for which the 5-WHY Analysis is being considered.
2. The source of each direct cause is from a cause & effect - fish bone analysis. Each cause of the fishbone analysis is taken as the Direct cause in 5 Why analysis and is
futher drilled down to identify the root cause.
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Causal Analysis & Preventive Action Form

<To be Filled In by Project DPA >
Date Changes Updated Effort

by spent on
Causal
analysis,
meeting,
CAPA
form
18-Jan-11 Schedule Varia MUDASSAR 0.5hr
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Causal Analysis, Corrective Action and Preventive Action Form

<To be Filled In by DPA during Project Level Causal Analysis for defects encountered in the
project>
Project Code C100339
Project Name BERGSTROM INC. Identify the source from where the defects are reported during Reviews or Testing.
21-Apr-08 This can be categorized as
1) Internal -> Reported by the Project team. Like Peer Reviews
Project Start Date
2) External -> Reported by the other Project teams like Testing Horizontal(IV&VS) or third party vendors.
3) Customer-> Reported by Customer
21-Apr-11
Project End Date
Project Unit for Defect Density Size (in FP) Optional Field - For Projects
using Operational Definition
Project Manager Name PRAKHAR KUMAR Mandatory
wherein there is not weighted
Project Type/LCM Mechanical Legacy dd, projects can just enter the Field -Based Optional
total count without classifying on the 5 Why field if
This Project DPA Name From Date To Date based on severity Analysis
Col K,L,M are Optional required
can be <Enter Date of outcome,
Fields can be used while document
used <Enter Name of DPA> <Enter Date of release> tracking individual defects select from the
to appointment> the analysis
drop down box outcome
track MUDASSAR 1-May-2010 15-Apr-2011
Defect Defect Type - OMS in
ID Mandatory field for *Insert a row above if you would like to add additional DPA's PMSmart
generating the trend Mandatory Col E & F are Optional
charts field while Fields can be used while
Period tracking OU tracking individual defects Severity Causal Analysis
level Defects
Work Total
Sl. Project Defect Phase
Product Phase Detected Source Defect Type Mino Count of Planned
No. From Date To Date Code Description Injected Major Trivial Why Why Why Why Why Root Cause Analysis Description
Name r Defects Start Date
Schedule
Variance
due to
December
Engineer Internal Section not 10.72
1 1-Dec-10 31-Dec-10 C100339 Ev-Sv Delivery Delivery
not aware Review filled
Report
of closing 1. PL working with the
Modules on new joiners on the PM
18-Jan-11
time. Smart and clsong the
Modules.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
FOR ENTERING MORE DATA INSERT 2 ROWS ABOVE
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note :- Defects for which

Note :- Defects for which Correction,Corrective and
Correction,Corrective and Preventive Preventive actions are taken and
actions are taken and closed, enter the closed, enter the description
description with measurable quantifiable with measurable quantifiable
data proving the effectiveness. data proving the effectiveness.
For instance :- In case of effort or For instance :- In case of effort
schedule variation in project, after the or schedule variation in project,
CAPA is taken has the project achieved after the CAPA is taken has the
zero effort or schedule slippage. project achieved zero effort or
schedule slippage.
Corrective Action Preventive Action

Date when Effectiveness Date when Effectiveness
Planned Closure Planned Closure Goal for Remarks
Completion/C Goal for evaluating effectiveness Assessment Planned Completion/C effectiveness Assessment
Closure Initiation Date Responsibilit Status Effectiveness Description Closure Initiation Date Responsibilit Status evaluating Effectiveness
losure Date effectiveness will be or Start Date losure Date will be or
Date y Date y effectiveness
evaluated Description evaluated Description
No Vairance due to
Action being To be
10-Feb-11 18-Jan-11 Prakhar Open ignorance of 28-Feb-11
implemented assessed.
engineer.
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note: Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Type Description.
For Respective projects, Depending on the LCM selected in CAR Data - Defects,when the user manually selects the defect types for respective Phase-wise. A su
report with the total defect counts based on defect types Vs phase-wise gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect ty
sheet since this is organization wide defect type list.
Select the aplicable
phases from Column B2 Test Planning Requirement System Testing Acceptance Testing
from the drop down Analysis
Select the aplicable defect
types form A4 from the Cumulative Cumula Cumulative
drop down Defect Type Count % age Cumulative % Count % age
%
Count % age
tive %
Count % age
%
Deviation from Standard Template Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Standard Template Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Total Err:504 ### ### Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
efect Type Description.

e defect types for respective Phase-wise. A summary
jects are requested not to add new defect type in this
Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age
% % % % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Count % age Count % age Count % age
% % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Total
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulativ

Count % age
%
Count % age
%
Count % age
% Count % age
e%
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note: Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Type Description
For Respective projects in an OU, depending on the data ented in CAR Data - Defects for an OU, A summary report with the total defect counts based on defect types Vs
phase-wise gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect type in this sheet since this is organization wide defect type list.
Acceptance Testing Analysis Analysis(Conversio Architecture Board Assembly
n Strategy)
Cumulative Cumula Cumulative Cumulative
Defect Type Count % age Cumulative % Count % age
%
Count % age
tive %
Count % age
%
Count % age
%
Accuracy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Aesthetics Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Application error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Assembly Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
BOM Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Boundary conditions Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Code not Modular Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Compilation Errors Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Component error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Connectivity Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Convergence Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Data Interpretation Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Delivery Note Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Design error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Coding Standards Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Design Standards Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Standard Template Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Dimensional Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
EDA Tools Warnings/Errors Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Element Quality Parameters Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Element selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Ergonomics Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Error in Selection of Part Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Estimation Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Feasibility Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Fit Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Form Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Formatting Errors Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Funcation Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Function or File too Long Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Design Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
GD & T Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Geometry Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Grammatical/Spelling mistake Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Improper mounting holes Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Improper Test Environment Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate application knowledge transfer Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Code Coverage Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Requirement Coverage Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Test Coverage Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate vias in the RF ground Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inappropriate units Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incompatible Architecture Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Requirements/ specification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non - Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non - Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non-Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete non-Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete non-Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Resolution Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete test data Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inconsistency of units Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect alignment Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect assembly Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build configuration Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build files used Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build instructions Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Circuit simulation Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Clock Distribution Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Comments Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect components Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Decoupling Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect decoupling method Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect device selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect element selected element Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect External Interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect footprints Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Design Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Requirements/ specification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Incorrect gerber format Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect grounding Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect HW interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Impact Analysis Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Layer stackup Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Mechanical interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Mechanical-HW interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Memory Analysis Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect memory selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect model features Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Naming Conventions Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non- Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Requirements/ specification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect orientation of components Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect output Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB Assembly Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB material selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB Processing Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect power supply selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Processor speed requirement Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Recursion Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Release Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect RF budget analysis Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect RF input/output Matching Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Routing Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Run Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect schematic symbol selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect signal analysis Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect soldering material selection Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect soldering profile Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect spacing between traces Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect SW interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect SW-HW interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test data Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test documentation Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test setup Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect tolerances Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect trace impedence Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect trace Widths Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect User interface Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inputs Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Interface Design Errors Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Interface Related Defects Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Irregular or unclean surfaces Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Layer settings Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Loading Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Logical Flow/Sequencing defect Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Manufacturing Defects Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Material Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Memory Leakages/Handling Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Mismatch between part number and layout footprint Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Comments Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Requirements/ specification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non- Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Testing Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Requirements/ specification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Parts Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Modeling Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Non-Functional Requirements Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Overlapping of silk screen Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Overlapping silk screen Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Redundant Information Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Section not filled Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Software compatibility Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Standards Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Template Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test Criteria Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test environment Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test Sequencing Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Text Errors Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Textual Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Thresold values Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Too many Global Variables Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Too many Local Variables Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Topology Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
UI Related defect Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Units Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Unparamatric or Unconstrained models Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Usability Error Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Views Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ### Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Total Err:504 ### ### Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
n
t counts based on defect types Vs
ization wide defect type list.
Board Testing Coding/Construction Conceptualisation Conversion Conversion Preparation & Data Capture & material Delivery
Detailing Testing
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative
Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age
% % % % % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Design Development Drawing Creation Enhancement Request Helpdesk and Production High Level Design Initiation
Requirement Support
% % % % % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Integration Testing Knowledge Gathering Knowledge Transfer & Layout Low Level Design Maintenance Request Modeling and Detailing
setup Analysis (Data Conversion)
% % % % % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Package and Release PCB Fab Pilot Conversion Planning Regression Testing Requirement Analysis Requirements

% % % % % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Schematics Specification System & Requirement System Integration System Testing Test Automation Test Closure
Study
% % % % % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Test Execution & Defect Test Planning Unit Testing Validation (Testing) Verification Analysis Verification Prototype Total
Management
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative
Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age Cumulative % Count % age
% % % % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.8 CAPA
Defect Category Count % age Cumulative %
Data Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?

Functional Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Interface Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Documentation Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Process Reviews Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Standards Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Performance Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Environmental Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
Coding Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note: Please refer to the CAR G

For Respective projects, Depending on the LCM selected in CAR Data - Defects,when the user ma
report with the total defect counts based on defect Causes Vs phase-wise gets populated with agein
Select the aplicable sheet since this is organization wide defe
Select the aplicable defect phases from Column B2
Causes form A4 from the from the drop down
Architecture Requirement
drop down Analysis
Defect Cause Count % age Cumulative % Count % age
Delayed Clarification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###

Environment Issues Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Frequent Requirement Change Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Insufficient Testing Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Total Err:504 ###
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Cause Description.

Defects,when the user manually selects the defect causes for respective Phase-wise. A summary
gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defect Cause in this
s is organization wide defect cause list.
Requirement System Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing
Analysis
Count % age Count % age Count % age Count % age
% tive % % %
Err:504 ### Err:504 ### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
ceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing
Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Count % age Count % age Count % age Count
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing

% age Count % age Count % age Count % age
% % % %
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Total

Count % age
%
Count % age
%
Count % age
% Count % age
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Total
Cumulativ
e%
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note: Please refer to the CAR

For Respective projects in a n OU, depending on the data ented in CAR Data - Defects for an OU, A
phase-wise gets populated with ageing percentage. Projects are requested not to add new defe
Acceptance Testing Analysis
Defect Cause Count % age Cumulative % Count % age
Delayed Clarification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###

Environment Issues Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Frequent Requirement Change Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Improper communication Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadeqaute Standards Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Documentation Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Engineering Methodology Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate planning Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Process Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Review Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Skill Level Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Tool Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Inadequate Training/Education/Awareness Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Insufficient Testing Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###
Total Err:504 ###
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
e: Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Cause Description

ata - Defects for an OU, A summary report with the total defect counts based on defect causes Vs
ested not to add new defect cause in this sheet since this is organization wide defect type list.
Analysis Analysis(Conversio Architecture Board Assembly Board Testing
n Strategy)
% tive % % %
### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Board Testing Coding/Construction Conceptualisation Conversion Conversion Preparation

Detailing
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Conversion Preparation & Data Capture & material Delivery Design

Detailing Testing
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Development Drawing Creation Enhancement Request Helpdesk and Production

Requirement Support
% % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
desk and Production High Level Design Initiation Integration Testing Knowledge Gathering
Support
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Knowledge Gathering Knowledge Transfer & Layout Low Level Design

setup
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Maintenance Request Modeling and Detailing Package and Release PCB Fab
Analysis (Data Conversion)
% % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
PCB Fab Pilot Conversion Planning Regression Testing Requirement Analysis

% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Requirement Analysis Requirements Schematics Specification

% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
System & Requirement System Integration System Testing Test Automation

Study
% % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
est Automation Test Closure Test Execution & Defect Test Planning Unit Testing
Management
% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Unit Testing Validation (Testing) Verification Analysis Verification Prototype

% % % %
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Total
Cumulative
Count % age
%
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Err:504
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Optional Field can be

Causal Analysis, Corrective Action and Preventive Action Form used while tracking Causal Analysis Correction Corrective Action Preventive Action
This can be Mandatory field for defects when NC/Issue Optional field
used to track generating the trend type grouping is done if required
NC/Issue ID charts Date when
Planned Completion Goal for Effectiveness
From Details of the NC/Issue NC/Issue Receipt Total Count of Root Initiation Completion/ Closure Planned Closure effectiveness Planned Start
Sl. No. To Date NC/Issue Type Why Why Why Why Why Analysis Description Status Description Closure Initiation Date /Closure Status evaluating Effectiveness Assessment or Description
Date NC/Issue Identified By Date NC/Issue Cause Date Closure Date Responsibility Start Date Responsibility will be Date
Date Date effectiveness Description
evaluated
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Preventive Action
Planned
Closure Date
P_PSPF014_1.0 Causal Analysis Preventive Action Form

Note: Maintain 'CAPA_Period' sheets seperately for each period.
Work Product
CAPA Period Defect Category Defect % Cumulative % 80%
Count
Cumulative %
Defect Category Pareto - Review, Testing, Final Inspection, Customer Reported 10 47.6% 80%
11 120.0% Documentation 47.6%
5 80%
# of Defects
10 Process Reviews 23.8% 71.4%
9 100.0% Functional 4 19.0% 90.5% 80%
Table for Cumulative Defect Found in 8 Interface 95.2%
7 80.0% 4.8%
Review, Testing, Final Inspection, Customer Reported 1 80%
6
60.0% Data 100.0%
5
Defect data entered in the below table will create the Pareto chart on the right side, from which top contributors can be identified. As per this template, only
4 40.0% 4.8%
top 3 defect categories are being analyzed.
3 1 80%
Click the 'Sort' button after entering the data in the below table.
2 20.0%
Defect Category Major Minor Trivial Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks Standards 100.0%
Defects Defects Defects Count 1 0 0.0% 80%
10 0 0 10 47.62% 47.62% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 80%
Documentation Performance 100.0%
Documentation
Interface
Coding
Functional
Environmental
Process Reviews
Data
Performance
Standards
Others - Please Specify

Process Reviews 5 0 0 5 23.81% 71.43% Environmental 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Functional 4 0 0 4 19.05% 90.48% Coding 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Interface 1 0 0 1 4.76% 95.24% Others - Please Specify 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Data 1 0 0 1 4.76% 100.00%
Standards 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Performance 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Defect Category
Environmental 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Coding 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Others - Please Specify 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Defect Category Defect % Cumulative % 80%
# of NCs & Issues

NCs & Issues Category Pareto Count
Cumulative %
Total 21 0 0 21 SLA Management 10 71.4% 71.4% 80%
11 120.0% 1 80%
Process improvements 7.1% 78.6%
10
Defect data entered in the below table will create the Pareto chart on the right side, from which top contributors can be identified. 9 100.0% PQA/QA Reviews 85.7%
7.1%
Click the 'Sort' button after entering the data in the below table. 1 80%
8
NC / Issue Category NC & % - age Cumulative Remarks 7 80.0% PQA/QA Audits 92.9%
Issue % 7.1%
Count 6 1 80%
60.0%
5
SLA Management 10 71% 71% Customer Feedback 1 7.1% 100.0% 80%
4 40.0%
Process improvements 1 7% 79% 3 External Audits 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
PQA/QA Reviews 1 7% 86% 2 20.0% Others - Please Specify 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
PQA/QA Audits 1 7% 93% 1 Customer Audits 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
0 0.0%
Customer Feedback 1 7% 100% #REF! 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
External Audits
Customer Audits
SLA Management
0
Process improvements
PQA/QA Reviews
PQA/QA Audits
Customer Feedback
Others - Please Specify
#REF!
External Audits 0 0% 100% 0 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Customer Complaints 0 0% 100%
Customer Audits 0 0% 100%
Others - Please Specify 0 0% 100%
0 0% 100% Category
Total 14
Cumulative %
Identify Causes for Defect Category - <Defect Category 1 > Defect Category Defect % Cumulative % 80%
Count
Defect data entered in the below table will create the Pareto chart on the right side, from which top contributors can be identified.
# of Defects
Click the 'Sort' button after entering the data in the below table. Defect Causes Pareto - < Defect Category 1>
Cause Major Minor Trivial Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks 120% Inadequate Skills 10
Defects Defects Defects Count 100% 63% 63% 80%
Inadequate Skills 10 0 0 10 62.50% 62.50% 80% Non Adherence to 2 13% 75% 80%
Non Adherence to Standards 2 0 0 2 12.50% 75.00% Standards
Lack of Communication 2 13% 88% 80%
60%
Lack of Communication 2 0 0 2 12.50% 87.50% Negligence / Not following 1 6% 94% 80%
40%
Negligence / Not following the Process 1 0 0 1 6.25% 93.75% the Process Tools
Inadequate 1 6% 100% 80%
20%
Inadequate Tools 1 0 0 1 6.25% 100.00% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
0%
Internal Environm ent Setup Problem
Cus tom er Environm ent Setup Problem

Negligence / N ot following the Proces s
Anom alies in Customer Supplied Item s
Inadequate Self Review / O vers ight

Inadequate Manpower / Res ourc es
Inadequate Training / Education

Non Adherenc e to Standards
O thers - Pleas e Spec ify

Lac k of Comm unic ation
Inadequate Standards
Inadequate Process
Inadequate Skills
Inadequate Tools
Inadequate Process 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Anomalies in Customer 0 0% 100% 80%
Anomalies in Customer Supplied Items 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Supplied Items
Inadequate Manpower / 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Manpower / Resources 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Resources
Inadequate Training / 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Training / Education 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Education
Inadequate Standards 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Standards 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Self Review / 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Self Review / Oversight 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Oversight
Internal Environment Setup 0 0% 100% 80%
Internal Environment Setup Problem 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Problem
Customer Environment 0 0% 100% 80%
Setup Problem 0% 100% 80%
Customer Environment Setup Problem 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Others - Please Specify 0
Defect Cause
Others - Please Specify 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total 16 0 0 16
Cumulative %
Count
# of Defects
120%
Cause Major Minor Trivial Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks Inadequate Tools 10
Defects Defects Defects Count 100% 77% 77% 80%
Inadequate Tools 10 0 0 10 76.92% 76.92% 80% Negligence / Not following 3 23% 100% 80%
Negligence / Not following the Process 3 0 0 3 23.08% 100.00% 60% the Process Skills
Inadequate Skills 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 40% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Process 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Lack of Communication 0 0% 100% 80%
20%
Lack of Communication 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Anomalies in Customer 0 0% 100% 80%
0% Supplied Items to
C us tomer Env ironment Setup Problem

Negligence / Not follow ing the Proces s
Anomalies in Customer Supplied Items
Internal Environment Setup Problem

Inadequate Training / Educ ation

0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 0% 100% 80%
N on Adherence to Standar ds
Anomalies in Customer Supplied Items Non Adherence 0
O thers - Pleas e Specify

Lack of Communication
Inadequate Proces s
Inadequate Standar ds
Inadequate Tools
Inadequate Sk ills
Customer Environment Setup Problem 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Setup Problem
Others - Please Specify 0 0% 100% 80%
Others - Please Specify 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Defect Cause
Total 13 0 0 13
Cum ulative %
Count
# of Defects
6 120%
Cause Major Minor Trivial Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks Negligence / Not following 5
Defects Defects Defects Count 5 100% 100% 100% 80%
the Process
4 80%
Negligence / Not following the Process 5 0 0 5 100.00% 100.00% Inadequate Skills 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Skills 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 3 60% Inadequate Tools 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Tools 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 2 40% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Process 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 1 20% Lack of Communication 0 0% 100% 80%
Lack of Communication 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 0 0% Anomalies in Customer 0 0% 100% 80%
C us tomer Env ironment Setup Pr oblem

N egligenc e / Not follow ing the Proc es s
Internal Env ironment Setup Problem

Inadequate Self Rev iew / Ov er sight
Anomalies in Cus tomer Supplied Items
Inadequate Tr aining / Educ ation

Non Adherenc e to Standards
Lack of Communication
Others - Pleas e Specify

Supplied Items to 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Sk ills
Inadequate Tools
Inadequate Process
Anomalies in Customer Supplied Items 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Non Adherence 0
Customer Environment Setup Problem 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Setup
OthersProblem
- Please Specify 0 0% 100% 80%
Others - Please Specify 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Defect Cause
Total 5 0 0 5
# of NCs & Issues

Identify Causes for NCs & Issues Defect Category NCs % Cumulative % 80%
Cum ulative %
Data entered in the below table will create the Pareto chart on the right side, from which top contributors can be identified.
Click the 'Sort' button after entering the data in the below table.
NCs & Issues Causes Pareto
3 120%
Cause NC & % - age Cumulative Remarks Negligence / Not following 2
Issue % 100% the Process
Count 50% 50% 80%
2 80%
Negligence / Not following the Process 2 50.00% 50.00% Inadequate Skills 1 25% 75% 80%
Inadequate Skills 1 25.00% 75.00% 60% Lack of Communication 1 25% 100% 80%
Lack of Communication 1 25.00% 100.00% 1 40% Inadequate Tools 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Tools 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
20%
Inadequate Process 0 0.00% 100.00% Anomalies in Customer 0 0% 100% 80%
0 0% Supplied Items to
Customer Env ironm ent Setup Problem

Negligence / N ot following the Proces s
Anom alies in Customer Supplied Item s

Anomalies in Customer Supplied Items 0 0.00% 100.00% Non Adherence 0 0% 100% 80%
Internal Env ironment Setup Pr oblem

Inadequate M anpow er / Resources
Inadequate Training / Educ ation

N on Adherence to Standards
Lack of Com munic ation
O thers - Pleas e Spec ify

Inadequate Proc ess
Inadequate Skills
Inadequate Tools
Non Adherence to Standards 0 0.00% 100.00% Standards
Inadequate Manpower / Resources 0 0.00% 100.00% Resources Training /
Inadequate Training / Education 0 0.00% 100.00% Education
Inadequate Standards 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Self Review / 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Self Review / Oversight 0 0.00% 100.00% Oversight
Internal Environment Setup Problem 0 0.00% 100.00% Problem Environment
Customer 0 0% 100% 80%
Customer Environment Setup Problem 0 0.00% 100.00% Setup Problem
Others - Please Specify 0 0% 100% 80%
Others - Please Specify 0 0.00% 100.00% Cause
Total 4
Defects Injected vs Detected

Phase Wise Defect Injected / Detected Analysis
Remarks
Phase Injected Phase Detected
Phase
Major Minor Trivial Total Major Minor Defects Trivial Defects Total
Defects Defects Defects Defects Defects Defects
Acceptance Testing 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2
Architecture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase Wis e Defec t In ject ed / Det ect ed Anal ysis Phas e Injec ted
Build 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Phas e Detected
Prototyping 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Construction 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 1
Enhancement Request Requirement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Level Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Integration Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knowledge and Setup Phase 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Low Level Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Te s t E x ec u tio n a nd D e fec t M a na g em en t
E nh an c em e nt R e qu e s t R e qu irem e nt
S y s te m a n d R e qu irem e nt S tud y
P ro je c t P la nn in g a n d S ta rt U p
K n ow le dg e an d S e tup P ha s e
Package and Release 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
P ac k ag e a n d R e lea s e
R e qu ir em en t A n a ly s is
A c c e p ta n c e Te s ting
H ig h L ev e l D e s ig n
In te gra tio n Te s tin g
Tes t A u tom a tio n

Lo w L ev e l D e s ig n
S y s tem Te s ting
C o n s tru c tio n
M ain te n an c e
Te s t P lan n in g
Tes t C lo s ure
Ar c h ite c tu re
P roto ty p in g
Project Planning and Start Up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W ind U p
B u ild
Requirement Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
System and Requirement Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
System Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Closure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Execution and Defect Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Automation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase
Wind Up 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4 0 0 4 0 2 2 4
Defect Source Count

Defect Source
Internal External
Total # of defects reported :
Fishbone Diagram
Enter the Generic Major
Cause Category Enter the Generic Major Cause Category Enter the Generic Major Cause Category
Enter the Specific Causes associated with

respective major causes
Enter the Problem Statement
associated with respective

major causes
Enter the Generic Major Cause

Category
Enter the Generic Major Cause Category Enter the Generic Major Cause Category
60 of 75 HCLT Confidential
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
<Metric 1> - Periodic Trend

Planned Start
Period Date Ending Goal USL LSL Actual Analysis / Cause on deviation from goal Description
Date
TO ENTER MORE DATA, INSERT TWO ROWS ABOVE
<Metric 1>- Weekly Trend
12 9.00
8.00
% age
10 Goal 7.00
6.00
USL
5.00
8 4.00
LSL
3.00
6 Actual 2.00
1.00
0.00
4
ts LD
en H
m
2 re
ui
eq
R
0
<Metric 1> - End of Phase

Planned Start
Phase Goal USL LSL Actual Analysis / Cause on deviation from goal Description
Date
Requirements 6.50 8.00 3.00 11.00
HLD 6.50 8.00 3.00 9.00
LLD 6.50 8.00 3.00 3.00
Construction 6.50 8.00 3.00 5.00
Integration Testing 6.50 8.00 3.00 6.00
System Testing 6.50 8.00 3.00 7.00
UAT Support 6.50 8.00 3.00 0.00
<Metric 1> - Weekly Trend - Inferences
Date Inferences noted from trend / variance Description
HCLT Confidential Page 61 of 75

PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Correction (if any)

Planned
Initiation Date Closure Date Closure Responsibility Status
Closure Date
<Metric 1> - End of Phase
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00 Actual Goal
3.00
2.00
1.00 USL LSL
0.00
ts n g g t
LD LL
D io in in or
en H ct st st pp
re
m tru Te Te Su
ui on
s
io
n
em AT
eq C at st U
R gr Sy
te
In
Correction (if any)

Planned
Closure Date
Correction (if any)

PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Criteria for evaluating Date when effectiveness

Effectiveness Effectiveness Description Remarks Action
effectiveness will be evaluated
Actual Goal
USL LSL
Criteria for evaluating Date when effectiveness

Effectiveness Effectiveness Description Remarks Action
Goal for evaluating Date when effectiveness

Effectiveness Effectiveness Description Remarks

PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Corrective / Preventive Action (if any)

Planned Start Planned Goal for evaluating
Description Initiation Date Closure Date Closure Responsibility Status
Date Closure Date effectiveness
Corrective / Preventive Action (if any)

Planned Start Planned Goal for evaluating
Description Initiation Date Closure Date Closure Responsibility Status
Date Closure Date effectiveness

PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
ve Action (if any)

Date when effectiveness
will be evaluated
ve Action (if any)

Date when effectiveness
will be evaluated

PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Defect Count
Defect Type CAPA Period 1 CAPA Period 2 CAPA Period 3 CAPA Period 4 CAPA Period 5 CAPA Period 6
From To From To From To From To From To From To
Enter the period for which charts has to be generated 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10
Incorrect Release 0 0 0 0 0 0
Select the aplicable defect

types from A5 from the
drop down Chart Title Incorrect Release
Linear (Incorrect Release)

1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CAPA Period 1 CAPA Period 2 CAPA Period 3 CAPA Period 4 CAPA Period 5 CAPA Period 6
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Defect Count
Select the aplicable defect Defect Cause CAPA Period 1 CAPA Period 2 CAPA Period 3 CAPA Period 4 CAPA Period 5
Causes from A5 from the From To From To From To From To From To
drop down
1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10
Delayed Clarification 0 0 0 0 0
Delayed Clarification
1
Chart Title Linear (Delayed
Clarification)
Linear (Delayed
Clarification)
1 Linear (Delayed
Clarification)
1
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CAPA CAPA CAPA CAPA CAPA CAPA
Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Period 6
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
CAPA Period 6
From To
1-May-10 20-Jun-10
0
PSPF014_3.9 CAPA

Note: Main tain 'C APA_ Perio d' she ets se pera te ly fo r e ach p erio d.
Work Product
CAPA Period
Table for Cum ulative Defect Found in

Review, Tes ting, Fin al Insp ec tion, Cus tomer Reported
D ef ec t Ty pe Pa ret o - Re vie w, Te sting, Final Insp ec tion, C us tome r Re port ed
15 120.0%
Def ect data entered in the below t able will creat e the Pareto chart on t he right side, f rom which top contributors can be identif ied alt hough severi ty fi eld is not
required. As per this template, only t op 3 def ect categories are being analyzed.
Click t he 'Sort ' butt on af t er ent ering the data in t he bel ow t able.
Cumulative %
Defect Type Maj or Minor Trivi al Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks 100.0%
# of De fe cts
Defects Defects Defects C ount
Accuracy 7 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Aesthetics 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 10 80.0%
Application error 5 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Assembly 6 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
BOM 4 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Boundary conditions 60.0%
4 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Code not Modular 3 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Compilation Errors 2 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Component error 2 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 5 40.0%
Connectivity 2 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Convergence 2 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Data Interpretation 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Delivery Note Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 20.0%
1 0 0
Design error 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Coding Standards 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Deviation from Design Standards 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 0 0.0%
Deviation from Standard Template
Ap plicat ion e rro r
Code no t M odu lar
C omp onen t e rro r
Dime nsion al Erro r
Est imat ion Er ror

Fe asibility Erro r
F un ction al Err or
I nade quat e a pplicat ion knowle dge tra nsfe r
Mo deling Erro r
U sability Erro r
Da ta Inte rpr eta tion
D elivery Not e
D eviat ion f rom Sta ndar d Tem plat e
Elem en t se lectio n
F unc tiona l Des ig n
Inad equa te Code Cov erag e

Ina dequ ate Req uirem ent Cov era ge
In adeq uat e Test Co vera ge
I nade quat e v ias in th e RF g roun d
Inc om patib le Ar chite ctu re
I nco mple te F un ction al Re quire men ts/ spe cifica tion
In com plet e te st dat a
In cor rect bu ild co nfigu ratio n

I ncor rec t b uild f ile s u sed
I ncor rect Cloc k Dis tribu tion
I ncor rec t d ecoup ling m et hod
In cor rect F unc tiona l Requ irem ent s/ spec if icat io n
I nco rre ct L ayer st ack up
In corr ect M echa nical-H W int erfa ce
Inco rre ct mem or y se lectio n
I nco rrec t PCB m at erial select ion
I nco rre ct R ecur sion

Inc orr ect Relea se
In cor rect sc hem atic sym bol selec tion
Inc orr ect sold ering pro file
I ncor rec t SW in ter face
I ncor rect t est docu me ntat ion

I nco rrec t t est se tup
In corr ect tr ace imp eden ce
M em ory Lea kage s/Ha ndling
M issing F unct ional Requ ir em ent s/ s pecif icatio n
Sect ion not filled
Tem plat e
Te st Crite ria
Tes t Sequ encin g

Erro r in Select ion o f Par t
Inc orr ect elem ent sele cted elem en t
I nco rrec t g erb er f orm at
M ism atc h be twee n p art num ber an d lay out foo tpr int
UI R elate d de fec t
Accu rac y
Co mpilat ion Er ror s
Dev iation fr om Codin g Stan dar ds

De viatio n fr om Des ign Sta ndar ds
EDA To ols Warn ings/ Er ror s

Elem ent Qua lit y Par ame ter s
Ergon omic s
F or ma tting Erro rs
I ncom plet e F unc tiona l Req uirem ent s
I ncom plet e F unc tiona l Test ing R equir eme nts

I nco mple te Non - F unc tiona l Req uirem ent s
In com plete Non -F unc tiona l Requ irem ent s

I ncom plet e n on-F un ction al Test Ca se/T est Scena rios
Inc orr ect ass emb ly
I nco rrec t C omm en ts
I ncor rec t f oot print s
I ncor rec t F un ction al Test Cas e/T est Sc enar ios
In cor rect F unc tiona lT estin g Re quire me nts
I ncor rec t I mpa ct Analy sis
I ncor rec t M em ory Ana lysis
In corr ect Nam ing Conv ent io ns

I ncor rec t No n- Fu nctio nal Tes ting Requ irem ent s
In cor rect No n-F unc tiona lT est Case /Te st Sce nar io s
I ncor rect PCB As sem bly
I ncor rec t s ig nal a nalys is
I ncor rec t t race Widt hs
I nter fac e Re lated Def ect s
M issin g F unc tiona lT est Cas e/Te st Sc enar ios

Mis sing F un ction al Tes t Plan/ Test Stra teg y
M issing Fu nct io nal Te sting Req uirem ent s
Miss in g No n-F unc tiona l Tes ting Requ irem ent s
M issing Non -F unc tiona lT est Case /Te st Sce nar io s
No n-F unc tiona l Requ irem ent s
Sof twar e c om patib ilit y
To o m any Loc al Va riable s

T opolog y
Unit s
M ater ial
T extu al
1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
GD & T
BOM
Design er ror
F orm
Con verg ence
Fu ncat ion
F unct ion o r F ile too Long
Gram ma tical/ Sp elling m ist ake
Inc om plete Res olution
In corr ect Circ uit s imula tion
In corr ect Dec oupling
Inco rre ct device se le ction
Inco rre ct Fu nctio nal De sign
Inc orre ct gro unding

In corr ect HW in ter face
Inc orr ect Me chan ic al int erf ace
Inc orr ect Non- F unct ional Requir em ents / s pecif ic ation
Inc orre ct PC B Pr oces sing

In corr ect pow er supp ly se le ction
I ncor rec t RF in put/ out put Ma tch in g

Inco rre ct Rout in g
Inc orr ect Run
Inco rre ct solder ing mat eria l selec tion
Inc orre ct SW-HW inte rfa ce

In corr ect te st d ata
Inco rre ct User inte rfa ce
Lo ading
M issing Non- F unct ional Requir em ents / s pecif ic ation
O verla pping of silk s cree n

Over lapping silk scr een
Red unda nt Info rm ation
F it
Im pr oper Test Enviro nm ent
Inco rre ct alignm ent
I ncor rec t Pro cess or s peed re quire me nt
L ogica l Flo w/Sequ encing de fect
Test env ironm en t

Aes the tics
Asse mbly
Conn ectiv it y
Fu nct io nal R equir eme nts
Ge ome try
Im pro per mo untin g ho les
Inc omp lete Fu nct io nal Te st C ase/ Test Scen arios

In com plete F unct ional Te st Pla n/Te st St rat egy
Inc omp lete Non - Fun ction al Tes ting Requ ir em ents
Inco mple te non- Fu nct io nal Tes t Plan/ Tes t Str ate gy
Inc orre ct build in str uct io ns
Inc orr ect com pon ents
Inc orr ect F unct ional Requir em ents
Inco rre ct Fu nctio nal Tes t Plan/ Tes t Str ateg y

In corr ect F unct ional Te sting R equir eme nts
Inc orr ect mo del f eat ures
Inco rre ct Non- Fu nctio nal Re quire me nts
I ncor rec t N on-F un ction al Test Plan/ Test Stra tegy

Inco rre ct orien tat io n o f c omp onen ts
In corr ect RF bu dget an alysis
In cor rect sp acing bet ween tr aces
Inc orr ect toler anc es
Inp uts
In ter face Des ign Err ors
Irr egula r or un clean sur fac es
Lay er sett ings
Man ufa ctur ing Defe cts
Miss ing C omm en ts

M is sing Fu nct io nal R equir eme nts
M issing Non - F un ction al Test Plan/ Test Stra tegy
Mis sing Non- Fu nctio nal Re quire me nts
Miss in g Par ts
St and ards
Te xt Er rors
Th reso ld va lues
Too m any Global Var ia bles
Views
In corr ect Exte rnal Int erf ace
In corr ect out put

Bo unda ry c ondit ions
Inap pro priat e u nits
I ncon siste ncy of units
Un para ma tric or Unco nstr ained mo dels

Dimensional Error 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
EDA Tools Warnings/Errors 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Element Quality Parameters 1 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Element selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Ergonomics 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Error in Selection of Part 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Estimation Error 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Feasibility Error 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Fit 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Form 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Formatting Errors 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Defect Code
Funcation 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Function or File too Long 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Design 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Error 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
GD & T 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Geometry 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Grammatical/Spelling mistake 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Improper mounting holes 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Improper Test Environment 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate application knowledge transfer 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Code Coverage 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Requirement Coverage 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate Test Coverage 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inadequate vias in the RF ground 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inappropriate units 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incompatible Architecture 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Requirements/ specific 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Test Case/Test Scenari 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Functional Testing Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non - Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non - Functional Testing Requir 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Non-Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete non-Functional Test Case/Test Sc 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete non-Functional Test Plan/Test Str 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete Resolution 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incomplete test data 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inconsistency of units 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect alignment 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect assembly 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build configuration 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build files used 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect build instructions 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Circuit simulation 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Clock Distribution 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Comments 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect components 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Decoupling 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect decoupling method 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect device selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect element selected element 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect External Interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect footprints 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Design 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Requirements/ specificat 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Testing Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Functional Testing Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect gerber format 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect grounding 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect HW interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Impact Analysis 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Layer stackup 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Mechanical interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Mechanical-HW interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Memory Analysis 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect memory selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect model features 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Naming Conventions 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non- Functional Testing Requireme 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Requirements/ speci 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Test Case/Test Scen 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Non-Functional Test Plan/Test Strat 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect orientation of components 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect output 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB Assembly 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB material selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect PCB Processing 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect power supply selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Processor speed requirement 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Recursion 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Release 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect RF budget analysis 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect RF input/output Matching 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Routing 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect Run 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect schematic symbol selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect signal analysis 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect soldering material selection 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect soldering profile 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect spacing between traces 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect SW interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect SW-HW interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test data 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test documentation 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect test setup 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect tolerances 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect trace impedence 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect trace Widths 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Incorrect User interface 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Inputs 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Interface Design Errors 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Interface Related Defects 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Irregular or unclean surfaces 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Layer settings 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Loading 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Logical Flow/Sequencing defect 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Manufacturing Defects 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Material 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Memory Leakages/Handling 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Mismatch between part number and layout foo 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Comments 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Requirements/ specificatio 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Test Case/Test Scenarios 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Test Plan/Test Strategy 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Functional Testing Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non- Functional Test Plan/Test Strate 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Testing Requiremen 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Requirements/ specifi 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Non-Functional Test Case/Test Scena 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Missing Parts 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Modeling Error 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Non-Functional Requirements 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Overlapping of silk screen 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Overlapping silk screen 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Redundant Information 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Section not filled 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Software compatibility 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Standards 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Template 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test Criteria 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test environment 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Test Sequencing 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Text Errors 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Textual 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Thresold values 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Too many Global Variables 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Too many Local Variables 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Topology Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
0 0 0
UI Related defect 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Units 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Unparamatric or Unconstrained models 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Usability Error 0 0 0 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
Views Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
0 0 0
Total 46 0 0 Err:504 SLA Management 2 40.0% 40.0% 80%
NCs & Issues Type Pareto
# of NCs & Issues

3 120.0% Process improvements 1 20.0% 60.0% 80%
Cum ulative %
Tab l e fo r NC a nd Issu es Fo un d in PQA/QA Reviews 80.0%
R ev ie w, Te stin g , Fi n al Insp e ctio n , C u stom er R e po rte d 100.0%
20.0%
Def ect dat a ent ered in t he below table wi ll create t he P areto chart on the right si de, from which top cont ributors can be identi fied. 2 80.0%
Cli ck the 'S ort' but ton af ter enteri ng t he dat a in the below t able.
1 80%
NC / Issue Type NC & % - age Cu mul ati ve Remarks 60.0%
PQA/QA Audits 100.0%
Issue % 20.0%
Count 1 80%
1 40.0%
SLA Management 2 40% 40% Customer Feedback 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Process improvements 1 20% 60% 20.0% External Audits 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
PQA/QA Reviews 1 20% 80% Customer Complaints 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
0 0.0%
PQA/QA Audits 1 20% 100% Customer Audits 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
Cust omer Audit s
Ot hers - Please S pecify

SLA Management
Proc es s improv ements
PQA/ QA Rev iews
PQA/ QAAudits
Cus tomer Feedbac k
Cus tomer Complaints

Ex ternal Audits
Customer Feedback 0 0% 100% Others - Please Specify 0 0.0% 100.0% 80%
External Audits 0 0% 100%
Customer Complaints 0 0% 100%
Customer Audits 0 0% 100%
Others - Please Specify 0 0% 100% Category
Total 5
Cu mu la tive %
Id entify Causes for Defect Type - <Defect Type 1 > Defect Category De fect % Cumulative % 80%
Count
Def ect dat a ent ered in t he below table wi ll create t he P areto chart on the right si de, from which top cont ributors can be identi fied.
# of Defects
4 Defect Causes Pareto - < Defect Code 1> 120 %
Cause Maj or Minor Trivi al Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks Delayed Clarification 3
Defects Defects Defects C ount 100 % 43% 43% 80%
3
80%
Delayed Clarification 3 0 0 3 42.86% 42.86% Environment Issues 2 29% 71% 80%
2 60%
Environment Issues 2 0 0 2 28.57% 71.43% Frequent Requirement Change 1 14% 86% 80%
40%
Frequent Requirement Change 1 0 0 1 14.29% 85.71% 1 Improper communication 1 14% 100% 80%
20%
Improper communication 1 0 0 1 14.29% 100.00% 0 0% Inadeqaute Standards 0 0% 100% 80%
In ad e q ua te E ng in ee r ing Me th o d olo g y
In a de q ua te Tr ain ing /E du c at ion /Aw ar e n es s

Fr e q ue n t R e qu ir e men t Ch a ng e
In a de q ua te Do c ume n ta tio n
I mpr o pe r c o mmu nic a tion
In ad e qu a te p la nn in g
E nv ir on me n t I ss u es
In a de q a ut e Sta n da r ds
I na d e qu a te Pr o ce s s
I na d eq u a te R ev ie w
In a d eq u at e Sk ill Le v el
In a de q u at e To o l
De la ye d C la r ific a tion
In su ffic ie nt Tes t in g
Inadeqaute Standards 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Documentation 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Documentation 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Engineering Methodology 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Engineering Methodology 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate planning 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate planning 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Process 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Review 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Review 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Skill Level 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Skill Level 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Tool 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Tool 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate 0 0% 100% 80%
Training/Education/A wareness
Inadequate Training/Education/Awareness 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Insufficient Testing 0 0% 100% 80%
D efe ct Ca use
Insufficient Testing 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Total 7 0 0 7
Cum ulative %
Id entify Causes for Defect Type - <Defec t Type 2 > Defect Category De fect % Cumulative % 80%
Count
# of De fe cts
Cli ck the 'S ort' but ton af ter enteri ng t he dat a in the below t able. Defect Caus es Pareto - < D efe ct Code 2>
4 12 0%
Cause Maj or Minor Trivi al Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks 10 0% Delayed Clarification 3
Defects Defects Defects C ount 3 100% 100% 80%
80 %
2 60 %
Environment Issues 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Frequent Requirement Change 0 0% 100% 80%
40 %
Frequent Requirement Change 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 1 Improper communication 0 0% 100% 80%
20 %
Inadequat e Training/ Educ ation/ Aw areness

Frequent R equirement Change
Inadequate E ngineering M et hodology
I nadequate Sk ill Lev el

Inadequat e Doc umentation
I nadequate R ev iew
I mproper c ommunic ation
Inadequate planning
E nv ironment I ss ues
Inadeqaut e Standards
Inadequate Proc es s
I nadequat e Tool
Inadeqaute Standards 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Delay ed Clarific at ion
Ins uff icient Test ing

Inadequate Documentation 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Skill Level 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Tool 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Training/Education/Awareness 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Training/Education/A
Insufficient Testing wareness 0 0% 100% 80%
Insufficient Testing 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Defect Caus e
Total 3 0 0 3
Id entify Causes for Defect Type - <Defec t Type 3 > De fect
Cumulative %
Defect Category % Cumulative % 80%
Count
# of Defects
Cli ck the 'S ort' but ton af ter enteri ng t he dat a in the below t able. Defect Ca use s P areto - < Defec t Code 3>
6 12 0%
Cause Maj or Minor Trivi al Defect % - age Cumulative % Remarks 5 10 0% Delayed Clarification 5
Defects Defects Defects C ount 100% 100% 80%
4 80 %
3 60 %
Environment Issues 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 2 40 % Frequent Requirement Change 0 0% 100% 80%
Frequent Requirement Change 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 1 20 % Improper communication 0 0% 100% 80%
I nadequate Training/Educ ation/Awarenes s

I nadequat e Engineering Methodology
Frequent R equirement C hange
Inadequate D ocumentation
D elay ed C larif ication
Im proper c ommunic at ion

E nv ironment I ss ues
I nadeqaute St andards
Inadequate Sk ill Level
Inadequat e Tool
Inadequate planning
Insuffic ient Tes ting

Inadequate Proc ess
I nadequat e Rev iew

Inadeqaute Standards 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Documentation 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Skill Level 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Tool 0
Inadequate Training/Education/Awareness 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00% Training/Education/A
Insufficient Testing 0 0 0 0 0.00% 100.00%
Defect Cause
Total 5 0 0 5
# o f NCs & Issu es

Iden tify C auses fo r NCs & Issu es Defect Category NCs % Cumulative % 80%
Cu mu lativ e %
Data entered in the below t able will creat e the Pareto chart on t he right side, f rom which top contribut ors can be identifi ed.
NC and Issue Ca use s P areto
3 120%
Cause NCs % - age Cu mul ati ve Remarks Delayed Clarification 2
Count % 100% 50% 50% 80%
Delayed Clarification 2 50.00% 50.00% 2 80% Environment Issues 1 25% 75% 80%
Environment Issues 1 25.00% 75.00% 60% 25% 100% 80%
Frequent Requirement Change 1
1 40%
Frequent Requirement Change 1 25.00% 100.00% Improper communication 0 0% 100% 80%
20%
Improper communication 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadeqaute Standards 0 0% 100% 80%
0 0%
In ad e q ua te Tra in ing /E du c at ion /Aw ar e n es s

In a de q ua te E ng in ee r ing Me t ho d olo g y
F re q u en t Re q uir e men t Ch a n ge
I na d e qu a te D oc u me nt at ion
Inadeqaute Standards 0 0.00% 100.00%
De la ye d C lar ific a tio n
Imp r op e r c ommu n ica tio n
In s u f icie n t Te s tin g
Inadequate Documentation 0 0% 100% 80%
In a d eq a ut e Sta n da r d s
I na d e qu a te Pr o ce s s
In a d eq u at e Sk ill Le v el
I na d e qu a te To ol
In a d eq u at e pla n nin g
En v iro n me nt Is s ue s
In ad e q ua te R e vie w
Inadequate Documentation 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Engineering Methodology 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Engineering Methodology 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate planning 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate planning 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Process 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Process 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Review 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Review 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Skill Level 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Skill Level 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate Tool 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Tool 0 0.00% 100.00% Inadequate 0 0% 100% 80%
Inadequate Training/Education/Awareness 0 0.00% 100.00% Training/Education/A
Insufficient Testing 0 0.00% 100.00% Cause
Total 4
Phase Wise Defect Injected / Detected Analysis

Remarks Pha se Wis e D efe c t Inje ct ed / De te ct ed Ana lys is Pha se
Phase
Phase Injected Phase Detected Injected
Phase
Maj or Minor Trivi al Total Major Minor Defects Trivial Defects Total Acceptance Testing
Defects Defects Defects Defects Defects Defects 1
De fe cts Injected vs Detected

Ph a s e In j e cte d P ha s e De te cte d
Acceptance Testing 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 Architecture 0
Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Build 1
Analysis(Conversion Strategy) 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Prototyping 0
Architecture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Construction 2
Board Assembly 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 Enhancement Request Requirement 0
Board Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 High Level Design 0
Build 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Integration Testing 0
Coding/Construction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge and Setup Phase 0
Conceptualisation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low Level Design 0
Conversion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance 0
Conversion Preparation & Detailing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Package and Release 0
Data Capture & material Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project Planning and Start Up 0
Delivery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Requirement Analysis 0
Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 System and Requirement Study 0
Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 System Testing 0
2
Drawing Creation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Test Closure 0
Enhancement Request Requirement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Test Execut ion and Defect 0
Helpdesk and Production Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Test Automation 0
High Level Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Test Planning 0
Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wind Up #REF!
Integration Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knowledge Gathering 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knowledge Transfer & setup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Layout 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Low Level Design 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maintenance Request Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
69 of 75 HCLT Confidentia l
Ac c ept anc e Tes ting
Build
Tes t Automation
Requirement Analys is
Enhanc ement Reques t Requirement
Architecture
Prototyping
Const ruc tion
High Lev el Des ig n
Knowledge and Set up P has e
Maintenanc e
Pack age and Release
Projec t Planning and St art Up
Sy stem Test ing
Tes t Clos ure
Tes t Planning
Sy st em and Requirement S tudy
Test Ex ecution and Defec t Management

Integration Test ing
Low Lev el Des ign
Wind Up
Phase
De fe cts Injected vs Detected
Ph a s e In j e cte d P ha s e De te cte d
PSPF014_3.9 CAPA
1
Modeling and Detailing (Data Conversion) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Package and Release 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCB Fab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phase Injected as per CAR Guideline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pilot Conversion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Regression Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Requirement Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Schematics 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Specification 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
System & Requirement Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Accept ance Testing
Architecture
Build
Prototyping
Const ruction
High Lev el Des ig n
Knowledge and Set up P hase
Maintenance
Projec t Planning and St art Up
System Test ing
Tes t Closure
Test Automation
Tes t Planning
Requirement Analysis
Enhancement Reques t Requirement
Test Ex ecution and Defec t Management

Integration Test ing
Package and Release
Wind Up
Syst em and Requirement S tudy
Low Level Design
System Integration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
System Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Automation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Closure 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Execution & Defect Management 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Test Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Phase
Test Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unit Testing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Validation (Testing) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Verification Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Verification Prototype 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 4 0 0 4 0 2 2 4
Defect Source Count

Defect Source
Internal External
Total # of defects reported :
70 of 75 HCLT Confidentia l
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
NC & Issue Count
Select the aplicable NC & NC & Issue Type CAPA Period 1 CAPA Period 2 CAPA Period 3 CAPA Period 4 CAPA Period 5 CAPA Period 6
Issue Type from A5 from From To From To From To From To From To From To
the drop down
Enter the period for which charts has to be generated 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10
PQA/QA Reviews 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chart Title
PQA/QA Reviews
Linear (PQA/QA
Reviews)
Linear (PQA/QA
1 Reviews)
Linear (PQA/QA
1 Reviews)
1 Linear (PQA/QA
Reviews)
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Select the aplicable NC &

Issue Cause from A5 NC & Issue Count
from the drop down
NC & Issue Cause CAPA Period 1 CAPA Period 2 CAPA Period 3 CAPA Period 4 CAPA Period 5
From To From To From To From To From To
Enter the period for which charts has to be generated 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10 1-May-10 20-Jun-10
Frequent Requirement Change 0 0 0 0 0
Chart Title
Frequent
Requirement
Change
1 Linear (Frequent
Requirement
1 Change)
1
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
CAPA Period 6
From To
1-May-10 20-Jun-10
0
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
Note: The source of each direct cause is from a cause & effect - fish bone analysis. Each cause of the fishbone analysis is taken as the Direct cause in 5 Why analysis and is futher drilled down to identify the root cause
Caution: If your last answer is something you cannot control, go back up to previous answer.
Direct Cause
These are the causal factors that directly result in an event, problem, issue or incident. Do not switch to asking “who, when, or where.”
Root Cause
This is the causal factor that, if eliminated, would prevent the occurrence of the event, or the reoccurrence due to similar conditions. Once it becomes difficult to respond to “WHY”, the probable Root Cause may have been
identified.
Mention the phase when the problem was
identified (For Eg: Customer reported, Requirement
phase, conceptualisation phase, design phase, 5 Why ANALYSIS
Verification phase, validation phase, Testing
Customer: Project/Support/Group: phase, SRS, HLD, LLD, Coding, Testing, etc) Analysed By: Date:
Causal Analysis
Sl. Identified Goal/ Target/ Problem deteceted Corrective Target
Data Source Actual Observation Direct Cause Root
No. Problem Specification Phase Why Why Why Why Why Action Date
Cause
PSPF014_3.10 CAPA
own to identify the root cause
robable Root Cause may have been
Preventive Target
Action Date

C100339-Causal Analysis and Preventive Action-18JAN20110

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

C100339-Causal Analysis and Preventive Action-18JAN20110

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Causal Analysis and Preventive action

General Tips & Information for using this form

Title and Revision History:

CAR Data - Defects:

Defect type & phase Summary Prj :

Defect type & phase Summary(OU) :

Defect Cause & phase Summary Prj :

Defect Cause & phase Summary(OU) :

CAR Data - NCs & Issues:

CAR Data - Metrics

NC & Issue Type_Trend

NC & Issue Cause_Trend

Causal Analysis & Preventive Action Form

Date Changes Updated Effort

Causal Analysis, Corrective Action and Preventive Action Form

FOR ENTERING MORE DATA INSERT 2 ROWS ABOVE

Note :- Defects for which

Corrective Action Preventive Action

efect Type Description.

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Total

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulativ

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Defect Category Count % age Cumulative %

Data Err:504 #NAME? #NAME?

Note: Please refer to the CAR G

Defect Cause Count % age Cumulative % Count % age

Delayed Clarification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###

Total Err:504 ###

Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Cause Description.

### Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Acceptance Testing Total

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Note: Please refer to the CAR

Defect Cause Count % age Cumulative % Count % age

Delayed Clarification Err:504 Err:504 Err:504 ### ###

e: Please refer to the CAR Guideline for Defect Cause Description

Board Testing Coding/Construction Conceptualisation Conversion Conversion Preparation

Conversion Preparation & Data Capture & material Delivery Design

Development Drawing Creation Enhancement Request Helpdesk and Production

Knowledge Gathering Knowledge Transfer & Layout Low Level Design

PCB Fab Pilot Conversion Planning Regression Testing Requirement Analysis

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Requirement Analysis Requirements Schematics Specification

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

System & Requirement System Integration System Testing Test Automation

Unit Testing Validation (Testing) Verification Analysis Verification Prototype

Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative

Err:504 Err:504 Err:504

Optional Field can be

Causal Analysis & Preventive Action Form

Others - Please Specify

# of NCs & Issues

Others - Please Specify

Internal Environm ent Setup Problem