Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/46548464
CITATIONS READS
3 418
2 authors, including:
Ann Veiderpass
University of Gothenburg
17 PUBLICATIONS 333 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ann Veiderpass on 27 January 2015.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT
Tliis paper examines the efficiency and llie f)roductivity growtli in tlie Penivian
cement industiy in a nudtiple itiput-single oiit|)ut frainework. Productivo effi-
ciency measures are calculate<l by use of non-paramclric Data Envelopment
Analysis (DEA) metliod and productivity growtli is measured by mcans of the
Malmquist Índex, llie DEA metluxl ilefines a non-parametric best practico frontier
tliat can be used as a refeience for cfní'iency nieasiires. Tliis íIKIí-X is llie ralio
of Üie Farell ineasiires for a piodiicliori uiiil with a lechiiical efficiency iii Iwo
points of time wliich is measured iii relation lo two different frontiers. The
Malmquist indox is calculated froin llie efficieney measures of Üie ÜV..\ inodel.
Efficiency as wcli as protluclivity coniparisons are mude hetween tlie tlif-
ferent cenient plants duriug a perio<l of 1 7 years. The study indicales relatively
sitiall (Uffereiiccs hetween inpiil savingand onlpiit increasiiig nieasiires atul that
the rankingof the individual nnits rctnains fairly constant dnriiig ihe different years.
Wlieri cotnparing the development duriiig the period 1970-1976 to that of
1980-1986, w-efuid that niost i)ro(luctioii imitsexperience a positive produclivity
cliange.
INTRODUCCIóN
£', = III/IID
EFICIENCIA EN LA INDUSTRIA CEMENTERA DEL PERÚ 313
Insumo
E, = E,/E,
l-Kj-^ (le)
IL MEDIDAS DE PRODUCTIVIDAD
Producto /fui
. pt+1 X
t+1
/í ' ^^
Yt
f. L-
^-ri
/ y^
B C Insumo
E'*^' = OA/OD
£•'•'*' = OF/OE
MC 71. t
OC/OD
2. Los dalos
Unidad 1 2 3 4 5 6
Irisuirws
L 290 215 162 289 101 152
E 76 0 «}.6 92 447.3 17 445.4 59 851.7 9 735.9 21821.8
0 490.2 616.2 256.8 636.4 163.3 160.2
C 508.8 1 060.0 190.8 692.7 95.4 320.5
Producto
Y 409.2 762.6 173.3 437.3 83.5 172.0
Unidad Año L/Y 1(P E/Y 0/Y\(P Año L/YW E/Y 0/^106
Unidad Año L/Y l(P E/Y 0/Y](/> Año L/Y\(P E/Y 0/Yl(^
1 1980 76 198.1 1 154 1984 77 177.4 1 115
2 1980 23 116.8 644 1984 25 117.0 673
4 1980 33 128.4 1 305 1984 84 153.1 1542
5 1980 123 117.8 2 192 1984 107 98.9 1528
6 1980 68 131.7 898 1984 79 165.2 1087
1 1981 77 192.1 1 136 1985 74 179.4 991
2 1981 22 113.8 783 1985 24 117.1 1013
4 1981 52 114.4 1 199 1985 96 135.8 1268
5 1981 118 120.2 1 745 1985 117 103.8 1396
6 1981 50 150.2 973 1985 98 124.5 680
1 1982 66 178.9 1 141 1986 68 164.5 923
2 1982 21 108.3 800 1986 19 115.9 680
4 1982 64 164.9 1 536 1986 69 138.9 1 155
5 1982 111 100.8 1 385 1986 105 103.7 1650
6 1982 68 137.5 940 1986 76 152.1 952
1 1983 77 174.8 1 118
2 1983 27 122.5 750
4 1983 83 148.8 1 319
5 1983 118 95.3 1619
6 1983 72 124.4 806
1. Eficiencia productiva
CUADRO 3a (conclusión)
2. Cambio de la productividad
V. COMENTARIOS FINALES
REFERENCIAS niBLIOCRÁFICAS