Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
http://journals.cambridge.org/AQY
‘Celts: art and identity’ exhibition: ‘New Celticism’ at the British Museum
Manuel Fernández-Götz
“To many, perhaps to most people [ . . . ] ‘Celtic’ of any sort is [ . . . ] a magic bag
into which anything may be put, and out of which almost anything may come [ . . . ]
Anything is possible in the fabulous Celtic twilight” (Tolkien 1963: 29–30; quotation
reproduced at the entrance of the exhibition).
Controversies about the ‘Celts’ have constituted an ongoing debate over the last few decades,
with postures ranging from blank scepticism and denial, to critical revisions, but also to
the maintenance of more traditional approaches. After a lively and overall useful debate in
the pages of Antiquity between 1996–1998 (principally with articles by Vincent and Ruth
Megaw vs Simon James and John Collis), Simon James’s controversial volume The Atlantic
Celts. Ancient people or modern invention? (1999) attracted considerable attention, both
among scholars and the wider public, encouraging discussions about the relationship—if
any—between modern Celtic identities and the ancient Celts. A major milestone was reached
with the publication of John Collis’s monograph The Celts. Origins, myths and inventions
(2003), which is probably the best historiographical review about the construction of the
concept and the different sources involved from Antiquity to modern times. One of his main
points is that classical sources never referred to the presence of Celts on the British Isles and
that the use of the term for the populations of ancient Britain was mainly an invention of
Debate
the modern era (see also Morse 2005, How the Celts came to Britain). From a rather different
perspective, new approaches based mostly on linguistics emphasise the crucial role of the
Atlantic façade in the development of Celtic languages (Cunliffe & Koch 2010).
Although initially a mostly British phenomenon, critical Celticism—called
‘Celtoscepticism’ by authors such as Patrick Sims-Williams, or ‘New Celticism’ by John
Collis himself—has also found a growing echo in Continental European archaeology, with
important contributions by leading scholars such as Gonzalo Ruiz Zapatero (2001) in Spain,
or Sabine Rieckhoff (2007) in Germany. The idea of a homogeneous Celtic culture and
society with a core area in Central Europe and a subsequent expansion during the Late
Iron Age as part of the spread of the La Tène Culture has now been abandoned, or at
least revised, within academic circles. It still represents, however, the dominant narrative in
numerous museums, books and media documentary across Europe. In addition, we have to
acknowledge the existence of a strong ‘popular Celticism’ or ‘public use’ of the Celts with
very heterogeneous manifestations (see Karl et al. 2012), from Celtic re-enactment groups
∗
Chancellor’s Fellow in Archaeology, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh,
William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK (Email:
m.fernandez-gotz@ed.ac.uk)
C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016
ANTIQUITY 90 349 (2016): 237–244 doi:10.15184/aqy.2015.193
237
Manuel Fernández-Götz
238
‘Celts: art and identity’ exhibition
Figure 1. Introduction to the exhibition ‘Celts: art and identity’ at the British Museum: Queen Mary’s harp, National
Museums Scotland; national Eisteddfod banner, Gorsedd of the Bards, Wales; Christian cross slab, Invergowrie, National
Museums Scotland; C The Trustees of the British Museum.
the Gundestrup cauldron is also present, albeit that this last entry is hardly a product of
Celtic craftsmanship (see Taylor 1992; Figure 2). Local highlights from the River Thames
include the Waterloo helmet and the famous Battersea shield, which also serves as an iconic
Debate
image included in the catalogue cover and in several exhibition flyers.
Section one (‘Who are the Celts?’) masterly summarises the main and changing meanings
of the word ‘Celts’ from Antiquity to the present. It includes maps showing the ‘Celtic
geographies’, a video with a ‘Celtic timeline’ from c. 500 BC to the early twenty-first century
and a selection of objects ranging from the impressive Iron Age statute of Holzgerlingen to
a medieval harp. This rather small introductory section reflects current trends within ‘New
Celticism’ and provides the right background for the rest of the exhibition.
The second section—‘The first Celts’ (we could also say ‘the Iron Age Celts’)—is by far the
largest of the exhibition, comprising the period from around 500 BC to the Roman conquest
(Figure 3). It is structured around several thematic topics such as ‘Farmers and artisans’,
‘Warriors in life and death’, ‘Dress codes’, ‘Horse power’, ‘The art of feasting’ and ‘Gifts to
the gods’. The amount and the quality of the displayed finds is overwhelming and represents
a fine selection of many of the masterpieces of Celtic art, from the decorated shield from
the River Witham (Lincolnshire) to the stone statue of Euffigneix and the aforementioned
finds (Glauberg, Basse-Yutz, Kleinaspergle, Waldalgesheim, Waterloo, Battersea), a wide
sample of Iron Age torcs, a replica of a chariot from East Yorkshire and the Deskford
carnyx—with a recorded performance on a reconstructed horn. Special mention should
be made of the impressive Snettisham hoards containing hundreds of gold and silver
C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016
239
Manuel Fernández-Götz
240
‘Celts: art and identity’ exhibition
Debate
Figure 3. Double-faced sandstone sculpture from Holzgerlingen (500–400 BC) at the beginning of section two, ‘The first
Celts’, height 2.3m; Wüttembergisches Landesmuseum, Stuttgart;
C The Trustees of the British Museum.
C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016
241
Manuel Fernández-Götz
242
‘Celts: art and identity’ exhibition
Debate
Figure 5. The druids: bringing in the mistletoe by George Henry and Edward Atkinson Hornel (1890);
C CSG CIC
way, presenting a ‘middle ground’ between diversity and heterogeneity, regionality and
connectivity. This is a must-see exhibition that will continue on to Edinburgh, doubtless
with a Scottish flavour.
C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016
243
Manuel Fernández-Götz
LEINS, I. 2015. Celts: art and identity. London: British RIECKHOFF, S. 2007. Die Erfindung der Kelten, in
Museum. R. Karl & J. Leskovar (ed.) Interpretierte Eisenzeiten
MEGAW, V. 2010. Bearing the truth about Celtic art: 2. Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie: 23–39. Linz:
Kunst der Kelten in Bern. Antiquity 84: 250–55. Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00099932 RUIZ ZAPATERO, G. 2001. ¿Quiénes fueron los celtas?
– 2013. A Celtic cornucopia. Antiquity 87: 280–84. Disipando la niebla: mitologı́a de un collage
histórico, in M. Almagro-Gorbea, Mª Mariné &
– 2016. Identifying Celts. Antiquity 90: 245–48.
J.R. Álvarez-Sanchı́s (ed.) Celtas y Vettones: 72–91.
MORSE, M.A. 2005. How the Celts came to Britain: Ávila: Diputación Provincial de Ávila.
druids, ancient skulls and the birth of archaeology.
TAYLOR, T. 1992. The Gundestrup Cauldron. Scientific
Stroud: Tempus.
American (March 1992): 81–89. http://dx.doi.
MÜLLER, F. 2009. Art of the Celts: 700 BC to AD 700. org/10.1038/scientificamerican0392-84
Bern: Historisches Museum.
TOLKIEN, J.R.R. 1963. English and Welsh, Angles and
PIGGOTT, S. 1970. Early Celtic art. Edinburgh: Britons. Cardiff: The O’Donnell Lectures.
Edinburgh University Press.
C Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2016
244