Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric
to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content
Name: Sp18 M2

Exit

Grid View
List View

Insufficient
Proficient Developing Emerging No Attempt
Evidence
Points:
2 (4%)
Part 0 Points: Points: Points:
22.00 Reflect on
Feedback 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%) Points:
feedback for the
summarization Not Used for Part 0 Part 0 0 (0%)
purpose of
is clear and Assessment See feedback. See feedback. Feedback:
improvement
useful; response Feedback: Feedback: Feedback:
plan is clear and
practical.
Points:
4 (8%)
Part 1:
Algorithm 1
Flowchart
demonstrates
how code will
determine each
parameter, uses
proper symbols
and connectors,
conveys each
step’s purpose
using concise
text, contains
Points: Points: Points:
Yes/True or
3.2 (6.4%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
15.00(Alg1) No/False text
Part 1: Algorithm Part 1: Part 1:
Construct and on decision
1 Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1 Points:
troubleshoot a paths, and
See feedback. See feedback. See feedback. 0 (0%)
flowchart using indicates
Repetition Repetition Repetition Feedback:
standard symbols continuous flow
Structure Structure Structure
and pseudocode from start to
Flowchart LOs Flowchart LOs Flowchart LOs
stop.
Feedback: Feedback: Feedback:
 Repetition Insufficient
Proficient
Structure Developing Emerging No Attempt
Evidence
Flowchart LOs
Feedback:
Your flowchart
is easy to follow
and detailed,
good. I would
recommend
adding a
parallelogram
before the end
specifying what
your function
will output.
Points:
4 (8%)
Part 1:
Algorithm 2
Flowchart
demonstrates
how code will
determine each
parameter, uses
proper symbols
and connectors,
conveys each Points: Points: Points:
step’s purpose 3.2 (6.4%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
15.00(Alg2)
using concise Part 1: Algorithm Part 1: Part 1:
Construct and
text, contains 2 Algorithm 2 Algorithm 2 Points:
troubleshoot a
Yes/True or See feedback. See feedback. See feedback. 0 (0%)
flowchart using
No/False text Repetition Repetition Repetition Feedback:
standard symbols
on decision Structure Structure Structure
and pseudocode
paths, and Flowchart LOs Flowchart LOs Flowchart LOs
indicates Feedback: Feedback: Feedback:
continuous flow
from start to
stop.
Repetition
Structure
Flowchart LOs
Feedback:
This flowchart
could also use
an output
parallelogram.
Points:
4 (8%)
Part 1,
Algorithm 1
Function code Points: Points: Points:
11.03(Alg1) follows all good 3.2 (6.4%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
Create a user- programming Part 1, Algorithm Part 1, Part 1, Points:
defined function standards. 1 Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1 0 (0%)
that adheres to LO Evidence See feedback. See feedback. See feedback.
Insufficient Feedback:
programming Proficient
List LO Evidence List LOEmerging
Developing Evidence LOEvidence
Evidence No Attempt
standards Feedback: Feedback: List List
Great! Good job Feedback: Feedback:
thinking about
the units of the
data and
parameters.
Points:
4 (8%) Points: Points:
Points:
11.03(Alg2) Part 1, 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
3.2 (6.4%)
Create a user- Algorithm 2 Part 1, Part 1,
Part 1, Algorithm Points:
defined function Function code Algorithm 2 Algorithm 2
2 0 (0%)
that adheres to follows all good See feedback. See feedback.
See feedback. Feedback:
programming programming LO Evidence LO Evidence
LO Evidence List
standards standards. List List
Feedback:
LO Evidence Feedback: Feedback:
List
Points:
5 (10%)
Parts 1&2,
Algorithm 1
Function
computes Points: Points:
Points:
appropriate 2.5 (5%) 0 (0%)
4 (8%)
11.00(Alg1) parameters, has Parts 1&2, Parts 1&2,
Parts 1&2, Points:
Create and valid function Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1
Algorithm 1 0 (0%)
execute a user- definition line, See feedback. See feedback.
See feedback. Feedback:
defined function has appropriate LO Evidence LO Evidence
LO Evidence List
input and output List List
Feedback:
arguments, and Feedback: Feedback:
reasonably
matches the
flowchart
LO Evidence
List
Points:
5 (10%)
Parts 1&2,
Algorithm 2
Function
computes Points: Points:
appropriate Points:
2.5 (5%) 0 (0%)
11.00(Alg2) parameters, has 4 (8%) Parts 1&2, Parts 1&2,
valid function Parts 1&2, Points:
Create and Algorithm 2 Algorithm 2
Algorithm 2 0 (0%)
execute a user- definition line, See feedback. See feedback.
has appropriate See feedback. Feedback:
defined function LO Evidence LO Evidence
input and output LO Evidence List List List
arguments, and Feedback: Feedback: Feedback:
reasonably
matches the
flowchart
LO Evidence
 List Insufficient
Proficient Developing Emerging No Attempt
Evidence
Points:
3.2 (6.4%)
Part 2B & 2C:
Algorithm 1
Points:
See feedback.
4 (8%)
LO Evidence List
Part 2B & 2C:
Feedback: Points: Points:
Algorithm 1
Make sure all 2 (4%) 0 (0%)
07.00 Create and Figures are
plot titles are Part 2B & 2C: Part 2B & 2C:
evaluate x-y plots plotted correctly Points:
descriptive with Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1
suitable for with proper 0 (0%)
reference to the See feedback. See feedback.
technical formatting for Feedback:
problem context LO Evidence LO Evidence
presentation technical
(thermocouples), List List
presentation
the independent Feedback: Feedback:
LO Evidence
and dependent
List
data (time, temp),
Feedback:
and the type of
data being
plotted
(heating/cooling).
Points:
3 (6%)
Part 2B:
Calibration
UDF
Use the
Points: Points:
dependent
Points: 1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
variable (y) data
2.4 (4.8%) Part 2B: Part 2B:
and the
12.03(Pt2B) Part 2B: Calibration Calibration Points:
predicted values
Manually Calibration UDF UDF UDF 0 (0%)
of the
compute the SSE See feedback. See feedback. See feedback. Feedback:
dependent
LO Evidence List LO Evidence LO Evidence
variable to
Feedback: List List
compute the
Feedback: Feedback:
sum of squares
of error using
the appropriate
equation.
LO Evidence
List
Points:
3 (6%)
Part 2C:
Algorithm 1 &
2
Use the
dependent Points: Points:
variable (y) data Points: 1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
and the 2.4 (4.8%) Part 2C: Part 2C:
12.03(Pt2C) predicted values Part 2C: Algorithm 1 & Algorithm 1 & Points:
Manually of the Algorithm 1 & 2 2 2 0 (0%)
compute the SSE dependent See feedback. See feedback. See feedback.
Insufficient Feedback:
Proficient
variable to LO Evidence List LOEmerging
Developing Evidence LOEvidence
Evidence No Attempt
compute the Feedback: List List
sum of squares Feedback: Feedback:
of error using
the appropriate
equation.
LO Evidence
List
Points:
3 (6%)
Part 3:
Algorithm 1
Purpose is
Points: Points:
clear, Points:
1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
improvements 2.4 (4.8%)
21.02(Alg1) Part 3: Part 3:
and metrics are Part 3: Algorithm Points:
Communicate Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1
fully but 1 0 (0%)
ideas clearly and See feedback. See feedback.
concisely See feedback. Feedback:
concisely LO Evidence LO Evidence
described, and LO Evidence List
List List
external Feedback:
Feedback: Feedback:
research is
referenced
properly.
LO Evidence
List
Points:
3 (6%)
Part 3:
Algorithm 2
Purpose is
Points: Points:
clear, Points:
1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
improvements 2.4 (4.8%)
21.02(Alg2) Part 3: Part 3:
and metrics are Part 3: Algorithm Points:
Communicate Algorithm 2 Algorithm 2
fully but 2 0 (0%)
ideas clearly and See feedback. See feedback.
concisely See feedback. Feedback:
concisely LO Evidence LO Evidence
described, and LO Evidence List
List List
external Feedback:
Feedback: Feedback:
research is
referenced
properly.
LO Evidence
List
Points:
3 (6%)
Part 3:
Algorithm 1 Points: Points:
Supports Points:
21.03(Alg1) 1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
2.4 (4.8%)
Evaluate model or assumptions, Part 3: Part 3:
claims, and Part 3: Algorithm Points:
algorithm Algorithm 1 Algorithm 1
1 0 (0%)
development using critical See feedback. See feedback.
decisions using See feedback. Feedback:
evidence-based LO Evidence LO Evidence
an appropriate LO Evidence List
 rationales source of Feedback: List List
Insufficient
Proficient
evidence. Developing Emerging
Feedback: Feedback: No Attempt
Evidence
LO Evidence
List

Points:
3 (6%)
Part 3:
Algorithm 2 Points: Points:
Points:
21.03(Alg2) Supports 1.5 (3%) 0 (0%)
2.4 (4.8%)
Evaluate model or assumptions, Part 3: Part 3:
Part 3: Algorithm Points:
algorithm claims, and Algorithm 2 Algorithm 2
2 0 (0%)
development using critical See feedback. See feedback.
See feedback. Feedback:
evidence-based decisions using LO Evidence LO Evidence
LO Evidence List
rationales an appropriate List List
Feedback:
source of Feedback: Feedback:
evidence.
LO Evidence
List
Raw Total: 49.20000 (of 50.00000)

Feedback to Learner
High quality work!

Name:Sp18 M2

Exit