Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A Constraints Defense
Submitted to
The Faculty of the Electrical Engineering Department
University of Mindanao
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering
Submitted by
June 2018
II. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
This research study has the goal to develop an enhanced coin operated
1. Economic
key in choosing the best design for the research (Economical, 2016). This
section will discuss different several costs like labor, material handling, energy
cost, and project implementation cost that will help the proponents decide
Pump school. (2007)., this formula can be used for compute the life cycle cost.
A development that meets the needs the need of the present without
compromising the ability of the future generations to meet their own need.
achieved when more effective and efficient activities are understood and
2. Sustainability
Geared Motor which is the design B that are being used. According to
sustainability for both Design A (linear actuator ) and the Design B ( geared
motor ).
I. Life Span
Life Span of the design pertains to its length of functionality without failing
be used to solve the life span. This formula can be used to solve the life
span for both Design A (linear actuator) and the Design B (geared motor).
Also according to Slocum, Alexander A.K. (2011) load life equation can be
formula can be used to solve the Total sustainability for both Design A ( linear
Parameters)
a. Focus on utilizing technologies with lowest life cycle cost and maximum
longevity.
ISO 281
quality of life, health and prosperity with social justice and maintaining the
earth’s capacity to support life in all its diversity. These social, economic and
society as a whole.
Device is durable
IEEE Std 1656-2010 The guide provides the end user with test
3. Manufacturability
The availability of the components and materials, as well as the repair and
maintenance materials used in the project should be within the reach of local
decided to use the following sub-constraints to compare which design has the
Raaz, N.A. (2014)., this formula can be used to solve the manufacturability
I. Time Span
solve the life span for both Design A (linear actuator) and the Design B (geared
motor).
whereas:
II. Availability
to obtain the availability of the motors.this formula can be used to solve the
time span for both Design A (linear actuator) and the Design B (geared motor).
% Availability = [ Purchase Time / ( Purchase Time + Order Time ) ] x
100%
whereas:
This formula can be used to obtain the material minimality of the materials.this
formula can be used to solve the life span for both Design A (linear actuator)
manufacturability.
products and services that meet customer and applicable statutory and
requirements.
The organization shall plan and carry out production and service provision
value added evaluations. Realize significant cost reduction on existing and new
programs. Focus on utilizing technologies with lowest life cycle cost and
maximum longevity.
Easy to Build. ISO 9001-Clause 7.5.1 Control of Production and
Service Provision- The organization shall plan and carry out production and
achieved when more effective and efficient activities are understood and
consistently provide products and services that meet customer and applicable
production processes that contribute directly to this capability are likely to have
Intensity of
Importance Definition Explanation
strengths and weaknesses of each design. Achieving the best benefits while
maintaining the quality and minimizing the cost of the design is best approach
through the use of this analysis. Also, the cost benefit analysis will help in
of the required materials to be used to know the current prices in the market
and in the online store. The present worth method is used in analyzing the cost
and benefit of the compared designs. This method is used to compare the two
designs and evaluate which design has the best advantage that will meet the
Thus, the data results show that Design A is better than Design B for the
Appendix A
Costing
The expenses in constructing the coin operated solar charging station are
APPENDIX B
1. Economic
= P 6457.7628
Economic Design 1
Environmental Costs P2
Economics:
2. Sustainability
Life Span
Where:
Durability
Rod)] / 2
Sustainability
= ( 88 + 91.75 ) = 89.875 %
Durability 91.75%
% Sustainability 89.875%
0.89875 * 5 = 4.494 %
3. Manufacturability
Sub-Constraints Design A
Availability 100%
% Manufacturability 49.21%
% Time Span = [(ETS - ATS) / (ATS)] x 100%
ATS=112 days
% Availability = [ PT / ( PT + OT ) ] x 100%
PT=1 day
OT= 0 day
% Availability =100 %
Minimality) / 3
=43.65%
1. Economic
P 7773.2
Economic Design 2
Environmental Costs P2
Decommissioning/ P1500
Disposal Cost
Economics
0.8057 * 5 = 4.0285
2. Sustainability
Life Span
Durability 90%
% Sustainability 85.2%
Durability
Sustainability
Sustainability
0.852 * 5 = 4.26 %
3. Manufacturability
% Time Span = [(ETS - ATS) / (ATS)] x 100%
ATS=133 days
Sub-Constraints Design B
Availability 100%
% Manufacturability 39.25%
% Availability = [ PT / ( PT + OT ) ] x 100%
PT=1 day
OT= 0 day
% Availability =100 %
Minimality) / 3