Quran: The Non-Distorted Divine Document

Qur’an: The Non-Distorted Divine Document
Written by: M. J. Fazel Lankarani
Translated and edited by: Ali H. Al-Hakim

Contents
Qur’an: The Non-Distorted Divine Document.......................................................................1

Contents..............................................................................................................................2
Introduction........................................................................................................................3
Point One............................................................................................................................3
Point Two...........................................................................................................................4
Point 3................................................................................................................................7
Point Four...........................................................................................................................7
Point Five...........................................................................................................................8
Point Six...........................................................................................................................10
Point Seven.......................................................................................................................11
Point Eight........................................................................................................................12
Point Nine.........................................................................................................................12
Point Ten..........................................................................................................................14
Point Eleven.....................................................................................................................15
Point Twelve....................................................................................................................17
Point Thirteen...................................................................................................................19
Point Fourteen..................................................................................................................20
Point Fifteen.....................................................................................................................21
Point 16............................................................................................................................23
Point 17............................................................................................................................23
Footnotes..........................................................................................................................27
Qur’an: The Non-Distorted Divine Document.......................................................................2
Page 2 of 28
Introduction
We are grateful to Almighty God who bestowed His blessings upon us to such a
degree as to render us worthy to uphold the noble object entrusted (amānah) to creation; the
unique miracle of the last Prophet (s), the ever-flowing fountain brimming with pearls of
truths for all eternity that is the Holy Qur’an upon whose revelation from the Absolute
Generous depends the dignity of human beings. This boundless sea that holds, within its large
and small waves, hidden mysteries of guidance and optimal paths to joy has, at the same
time, always been, and remains so to be, a beacon of guidance for mankind and his
communities. It is a book that will show the direction to every lost and misguided person till
the Day of Resurrection. It is a book that is brilliantly incandescent for all eternity; that leads
the way at every step; is remembrance in all states; and is the definite clear statement in all
dimensions relating to man and the universe. It is a book whose protector, according to divine
promise, is God, the Exalted; and the divine promise will be kept (God’s promise is true).
What are propounded as important points in this article include the most significant
points in the debate that the Qur’an has not been distorted. This is counted among the basic
discussions in the Qur’anic sciences. It is the duty of researchers and commentators of this
divine book to read up on all aspects of this discussion and explain all of its diffe distortion
has been created regarding the ascrirent dimensions. It can truly be said that grossption of the
idea that the Qur’an has been distorted by different Islamic sects and branches to the point
that an Islamic branch whose doctrine is based on the very idea that the Qur’an has not been
distorted, has, itself, been accused of possessing the idea of distortion of the Qur’an!
In the course of these points, other than investigating different aspects of this
discussion, we will prove that the Shia, in general, and the Twelver Shia in particular, not
only do not believe in distortion regarding the Qur’an, but also cannot basically accept such
an opinion; for the belief in distortion will destroy the very doctrine of the Twelver Shia.
So let us make a crucial decision, within this esteemed group of high ranking Islamic
scholars and distinguished religious figures, to declare an international manifesto which
emphasizes that the Qur’an - since its revelation to the Holy Prophet (saws) - is the
undistorted Divine document that can never be distorted.
It is not as if we consider the challenge an actual proposition and state that the Qur’an
has not been distorted; rather our claim, as a factual proposition, is in the form that the
assured custom (sunnah) of God, the Exalted, regarding this glorious book is that distorting
this book is impossible, so that no individual or group can launch an offensive to these divine
verses, and that this book is an eternal miracle that through challenge, in all times and places,
has safeguarded itself from the illusion of distortion.
In this article we do not intend to elaborately state all points related to this important
discussion; for such a task requires many volumes of books. What we intend to do is to
concisely investigate some important points so that clarification of an angle of important
dimension, relevant to this discussion, will become apparent, God willing.
Point One
The term taḥrīf (distortion)
Page 3 of 28
This word is the infinitive from bāb taf`īl and is derived from the root ḥarf. The word
ḥarf literally means the side of a thing; therefore, taḥrīf means to push aside an object and to
alter its sides and peripheral.
God, the Exalted, in the Qur’an says, “And among the people are those who worship
Allah on the [very] fringe (ḥarf)…” [2] meaning that there are those who have anxiety in their
religion, such as he who lingers at the edge of a war zone to ascertain whether the army is
about to become victorious so that he may collect some of the bounties; whereas, if the
outcome is otherwise, he flees. [3]
This term lexically indicates movement and changing, so we can claim that the term
taḥrīf is apparent in verbal distortion, and has gained semantic distortion in the Qur’an and is
due to context as secondary manifestation where, reproaching Jewish scholars, Allah
Almighty says, “Among the Jews are those who pervert words from their meanings” [4]; that
is they alter and distort the word of truth in the Torah from its divine place, meaning, and
purpose, and therefore do not attribute it to its obvious meanings. The existence of the phrase
‘from their meanings’ is a clear case of evidence that semantic distortion is intended. It is
from here that we observe that, explaining the word taḥrīf al-kalām (and not the word taīrīf),
Rāghib Isfahānī says, “Distortion of a discourse is making it one probability that can be
attributed with two possibilities.” [5]
Evidently Rāghib does not intend to define the literal meaning of the word taḥrīf but
rather wishes to state the conceptual distortion that has been mentioned in the verse.
Regarding the purpose of the holy verse, Fakhr Rāzī has propounded probabilities,
some of which confirm the subject of verbal distortion; however, he concludes that the
correct view regarding the interpretation of the verse is conceptual distortion. He says, “What
is intended by the term distortion is to cast false doubts and invalid interpretations, and to
divert the word from its correct meaning to an invalid one by using literal tricks to which
followers of heresy are accustomed.” [6]
Point Two
Usages and kinds of distortion
Some great scholars, including Ayatollah Khoei, have claimed that the term taḥrīf has
been used in six meanings as homonyms. It is with unanimity that Muslims accept that some
of them have been used in the Qur’an while others have not. A third group of the meaning is
disputable. Here it is preferable to quote Ayatollah Khoei’s statements regarding the
meanings of distortion, subsequently to analyze them.
1.taḥrīf means to transfer and alter an object from its position and meaning. The
following verse indicates this meaning:
“Among the Jews are those who pervert words from their meanings” [7]
This kind of taḥrīf is called ‘interpreting the Qur’an according to subjective opinion’
and semantic distortion. It is with unanimous agreement among Muslims that, upon the
occurrence of such distortion in the Qur’an in the case of those who have interpreted the
Qur’an in a way other than its reality and attribute to it a meaning other than its real meaning,
Page 4 of 28
they have distorted the verses according to their lower desires. Such distortion has been
reproached in the hadiths quoted from the Infallible Imams (as).
In his letter to Sa`d al-Khayr, Imam Baqir (s) wrote, “Regarding the Book, they
preserved its letters while they distorted its rules; therefore, they narrate the Book but do not
understand it.” [8]
2.Distortion in the process of which a letter or a diacritic mark has been missed or
added while the Qur’an itself has remained intact. Such can also be acceptable as distortion
for it has been proved elsewhere [9] that none of the available recitations has been related
successively. As a result, only one of them conforms to the real Qur’an and the others are
either the Qur’an with addition or with demolishment.
3.Distortion in the process of which one or more words has been added or demolished
from the Qur’an while the Glorious Qur’an itself has remained intact. Such distortion
certainly happened in the early period of Islam during the era of the companions but has been
opposed and disputed. The evidence for this is the unanimity of the Muslims. Uthman
collected some copies of the Qur’an and burnt them. He also ordered his men to burn
whatever they found which was other than the Qur’an. As a result, other copies of the Qur’an
differed with that of Ùthman (a group of the scholars has mentioned the differences among
them as Abu Dawoud Sajistānī in his book Kitāb al-Maṣāḥif). It can briefly be concluded
that distortion did exist in the copies of the Qur’an burnt byÙthman, but that the Qur’an that
Ùthman collected and made to prevail was the very same one known among the Muslims
and received from the Prophet (s) from hand to hand. So, such distortion was available in the
copies of the Qur’an prevalent before the era of Ùthman while this does not exist in the
Qur’an existing in our possession which is based on Ùthman’s copy.
4.Distortion in the process of which one or more verses has been added to the Qur’an
or demolished from it while the revealed Qur’an itself has remained intact. Except for the
holy verse basmalah (i.e. In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful) which, by
unanimous agreement among Muslims, the Prophet (s) used to recite preceding any surah,
such distortion has not taken place in any part of the Qur’an. It is disputed by the Sunni
Muslims as to whether or not the basmalah is a fragment of the Qur’an. But the Twelver Shia
believe that it is most assuredly a part of the Qur’an and they unanimously agree that it is a
fragment of every surah except for the ninth one.
5.Distortion in the process of which some verses have been added to the Qur’an so
that some of the verses of the Qur’an in our possession are in excess of the original Qur’an
which was revealed to the Prophet (s). There are two groups among the Muslims that hold
that there exists addition to the Qur’an. A: The followers of Àbd al-Karīm b. Àjrad, who
was an important personality among the Khawārijs, hold that Surah XII is not part of the
Qur’an. B: It was ascribed to Ibn Mas`ūd that he believed that the last two surahs of the
Qur’an were not genuine and are, therefore, not part of the Book. Other than these two
groups, the rest of the Muslims have unanimously disapproved of the occurrence of this kind
of distortion.
6.Distortion with the meaning of demolishment, namely that some of the verses
revealed to the Prophet (s) are missing in the Qur’an to which we have access today. Such
distortion is seriously disputed.
Page 5 of 28
It is concluded that distortion according to the first four meanings has certainly taken
place, the fifth meaning has not taken place according to consensus, and the sixth meaning is
disputable.
We have two objections regarding the statements of this great scholar (i.e. Ayatollah
Khoei):
First: Research necessitates that the above meanings are not those in which the term
distortion is used. Distortion has no meaning other than what was explained in the first
instance which was “moving an object from its position.” In other words, the concept of
“moving an object from its position” exists in all the above meanings but such moving is
either available in the meaning referred to as semantic distortion or is available in the word
and in this state is either detailed or slight.
In other words, an addition definitely takes place, or a demolishment definitely takes

place, or some addition or demolishment occurs. Therefore, what has been mentioned in the
statements of this respected scholar are cases of distortion, and not different meanings in
which distortion can be referred to as a homonym.
Second: Such classification necessitates that all types of distortion do not bear the
attribute “falsehood”; otherwise, it would oppose the absoluteness of the holy verse
“falsehood does not come before it” for it indicates that no falsehood can come into this holy
book.
So in the cases unanimously agreed upon by the Muslims, distortion should not be
possible although such a matter seems problematical in the case of semantic distortion.
Now that different meanings of distortion have been studied, we will deal with its
different kinds. As understood from the comments of the experts, distortion is divided into
six types:
1.Verbal distortion: this is concerned with demolishment, addition, change, and

movement in the words.
2.Semantic distortion: this means to interpret a sentence incorrectly so that the words
no longer have their apparent meanings. This type is called “subjective interpretation of the
Qur’an” which has been severely reproached in the hadiths. The Prophet (s) was quoted as
saying, “He who interprets the Qur’an according to his subjective opinions, will be placed
into hellfire.” [10]
3.Positional distortion: this means to register a verse or surah in a position contrary to

its revelation sequence. Such kind of distortion is absolutely wrong. In this type of distortion
all surahs are ordered and registered on the basis of their revelation but, concerning the surah,
itself, it can be claimed that all surahs of the Qur’an have been registered in the Prophet’s
order but contrary to their revelation order.
4.Recitation distortion: this means to recite a certain word in a way that contradicts
the manner used by all other Muslims; for example, most of the independent reasoning of the
reciters regarding their recitations.
Page 6 of 28
5.Dialectical distortion: the existence of different dialects among the tribes causes
various recitations so that each tribe recites the verses according to its dialect.
6.Conversional distortion: It refers to the case of changing a word to another whether

it is a synonym or not. Ibn Mas`ūd has prescribed in the synonyms and has said that àlīm
(omniscient, all-knowing) can be replaced with ḥakīm (wise, sage, sapient)
Point 3
Brief and Detailed Distortion
As mentioned before, distortion is either brief or detailed. What is under discussion

and dispute is detailed distortion so that any addition or demolishment that definitely occurs
is included in the meaning of distortion under discussion, but brief distortion, meaning that
something has been added or demolished from the Qur’an briefly is out of the dispute.
For instance, the differences in recitation or the difference in the claim of whether or
not the basmalah is a fragment of the Qur’an, and the subject that was mentioned as brief
distortion are out of the dispute, for the criteria of the distortion in the question of dispute as
to whether it is an addition or a demolishment are, in both cases, against the reality of the
Word of Allah, but there exists no doubt that, in the issue of difference of recitations, one of
them conforms to the real Qur’an.
As concerns the basmalah, undoubtedly the Prophet (s) recited it preceding each
surah. The difference is whether or not it is a fragment of the Book. Those who hold it to be a
fragment of the Qur’an claim that this is the original Qur’an, and those who do not have such
a belief hold that the original Qur’an does not include this verse, consequently, none of the
two parties presume their statement contradictory to the reality. Both parties have compound
consensus that the human word has merged into this Divine Word; the same is true for the
issues of the difference between the reciters.
So in the cases of brief distortion, although the reality of the real statement and/or the
real recitation is not concerned, this kind of distortion is out of controversy. The controversy
refers to a distortion in which something is demolished from or added to the real Qur’an.
Point Four
A single individual narration (khabar al-Wāḥid) is not enough to prove distortion.
As proving the (authenticity of the) Qur’an requires definite and scientific proofs, so
that by merely depending on a single individual narration one cannot prove that a certain
sentence is a Qur’anic verse, it follows that proving distortion in the Qur’an also requires
definite and scientific evidence. In other words, considering the fact that, in the field of
beliefs, a single individual narration or other speculative evidence is not sufficient, with
regards to the Qur’an, this is the most important evidential proof that such a narration can by
no means stand as proof for a fragment of the Qur’an.
That is why Shaykh Ṭūsī has written in his introduction to al-Tibyān, “The narrations
that suggest that distortion took place in the Qur’an, are all single individual narrations, and
Page 7 of 28
since such a narration does not bear certain knowledge, it cannot be used in the issue of
distortion.”
His viewed objective is that such a problem is among those problems which
necessitate certain knowledge.
Point Five
Opinions of the great Twelver Shia scholars denoting that the Qur’an was not
distorted.
The great Twelver Shia scholars believe that the Holy Qur’an was revealed to the
blessed heart of the Prophet (s), and so has remained intact (no addition and no
demolishment).
Here we quote, in brief, the statements of the great Twelver Shia scholars whose
writings are the pivot of the scientific and theological viewpoints of the Shia branch.
Two points should be taken into consideration in advance:
A.Some of the books compiled in the field of Qur’anic sciences attribute the
standpoint of distortion to a group of specialists in narration (akhbārī) among the Twelver
Shia. The Trash Collectors (Ḥashwiyyah) among the Sunnis have maintained distortion of the
Qur’an. It is remarkable that among the specialists in narration some of the great scholars,
like Shaykh al-Ḥurr al-Āmilī, the compiler of Wasā’il al-Shīàh, believes that the Qur’an was
not distorted; he has even written a treatise in this regard. Therefore, being the follower of the
school of the Akhbārīs does not necessarily suggest believing that the Qur’an was distorted.
B.Undoubtedly, the Twelver Shia scholars have consensus that no addition took place
to the Qur’an. Regarding the non-existence of demolishment from the Qur’an, some of the
great personalities like Muqaddas Baghdādī in his book, Sharḥ al-Wāfiyah [11], and the great
Shia authority Shaykh Ja`far Kāshif al-Ghiṭā’ in his book Kashf al-Ghiṭā’ have claimed
consensus. So it can be said that the Shia scholars unanimously agreed that the Qur’an has
remained intact and that no distortion, whether addition or demolishment, has taken place in
it.
Here are the comments of the great Twelver Shia scholars:
1.In his book Īḍāḥ, Faḍl b. Shādhān, a Shia compiler living in the 3 rd century AH,
after rejecting the kind of distortion that suggests demolishment, ascribes the narrating of
distortion to other branches of Islam.
2.In his book Risāla-ye I`tiqādāt (the treatise of beliefs) Abū Ja`far Muhammad b.
Bābawayh Qummī, known as Shayk Ṣadūq writes, “Our beliefs regarding the Qur’an are
these: The Qur’an revealed to the Prophet (s) is the very same existing Qur’an to which
nothing has been added. He who accuses us of maintaining demolishment in the Qur’an is a
liar.” So Ṣadūq, one of the greatest Twelver Shia scholars and a remarkable expert in hadith
and history denies the ascription of distortion to the Twelver Shia.
Page 8 of 28
3.In his book, Jawāb Masāi’l Ṭirāblusiyyāt (the answers to the questions asked in
Trippoli), Ali b. Husayn Mūsawī, known as Àlam al-Hudā, one of the greatest jurisprudents
and theoreticians in religious law (uṣūlī) says, “Knowledge pertaining to the authenticity of
transmission of the Qur’an is like the knowledge concerning cities and great events. As we
have definite knowledge regarding these things, we also have such knowledge about the
Qur’an, for the efforts of the Muslims and their different motivations to safeguard the Qur’an
has been extensive. At the time of the Prophet (s), the Qur’an was collected and was an
arranged collection so that he appointed a group to memorize the Qur’an. A group including
Àbdullah b. Mas`ūd and Ubayy b. Ka`b recited the Qur’an many times in his presence.”
Sayyid Murtaḍā adds, “A group of the Twelver Shia Muslims who, together with the
Trash Collectors (Ḥashwiyyah) from the Sunni Muslims, oppose this view are not worth
paying attention to for their opposition is based on weak hadiths which they assume are
authenticated, while they are not.” [12]
4.In this regard Shaykh al-Ṭā’ifah, Abu Ja`far Muhammad b. Hasan Ṭūsī has said,
“Speaking of addition and subtraction from the Qur’an is not befitting this Holy Book
because consensus indicates that addition is false, and the exoteric meaning understood from
the Muslim sects suggests that distortion in the sense of demolishment is also false and this
very matter is the valid standpoint of Twelver Shia scholars who agree with the authentic
hadiths. As for hadiths narrated in Sunni and Shia sources suggesting demolishment in some
Qur’anic verses, these should be disregarded for they are received through single individual
narration and do not bring about knowledge.” [13]
5.In the introduction of Majma` al-Bayān, his compiler, the great interpreter of the
Qur’an, Abu Ali Faḍl b Hasan Ṭabrisī writes, “According to the consensus of the Twelver
Shia, the statement of addition of a verse to the Qur’anic verses is invalid; the statement of
demolishment was narrated by a group of the Twelver Shia and a group of Ḥashwiyyah from
the Sunnis, but the validated viewpoint of the Twelver Shia opposes this.” [14]
6.Sayyid b. Ṭāwūs has said, “The standpoint of the Twelver Shia is that the Qur’an
was not distorted.” [15]
He has written elsewhere, “I am surprised with those who believe that the present
Qur’an is the same Qur’an that was revealed to the Prophet (s), and that he was the collector
of the Qur’an, yet at the same time they narrate the difference between the reciters in Medina,
Mecca, Kufah, and Basra, and as a conclusion they believe that the Basmalah is not a
fragment of the Qur’an and of the surah. It is surprising how, if the Qur’an is immune from
addition or demolishment – the view that is supported by wisdom and the Revealed Law -
they could maintain such a belief.” [16]
7.Mullah Muḥsin Fayḍ Kāshānī has said, “The hadiths that indicate distortion
contradict the Book of Allah, and necessarily should be either rejected or allegorically
interpreted. [17]
8.Regarding the Glorious Qur’an, Muhamma Bahā’ al-Dīn Āmilī, known as Shaykh
Bahīā’ī says, “The valid statement is that the Holy Qur’an has remained immune from
distortion whether addition or demolishment. What has become famous among the populace
denoting that the blessed name of the Commander of the Faithful had been wiped out of some
Page 9 of 28
verses like, “O Apostle! Communicate that which has been sent down to you from your
Lord”; such a view is not valid among the Twelver Shia scholars.” [18]
9.In a treatise proving that the Qur’an was not distorted, Shaykh Muhammad b. Ḥasan
al-Ḥurr al-Āmilī, the compiler of the significant narrative book Wasā’il al Shīàh has written,
“Those who investigate the history and hadiths transmitted from the Infallible Imams (a.s.)
will know with certainty that the Qur’an has been proved by an impeccable plurality of
narrators (tawātur) to a remarkable level and by the narration of thousands of the
companions, and that the Qur’an was a book collected during the era of the Prophet (s).” [19]
10.In his valued book Kashf al-Ghiṭā’, Shaykh Ja`far Kāshif al-Ghiṭā’ who was one
of the exceptional Shia jurisprudents has written, “According to the consensus of the Muslims
and what the religion and religious creeds indicate, nothing has been added to the Qur’an.
Also, according to the explicit statement of the very Qur’an and the consensus of the scholars
in all ages, nothing has been demolished from the Qur’an; therefore, the view of those rare
individuals who have opposed this view is disregarded.” [20]
These are examples of the views and standpoints of great Twelver Shia scholars both
the theoreticians in religious laws (uṣūlī) and specialists in narrations (akhbārī). It is
concluded from these statements that belief in distortion is among those superstitions, the
falsehood of which is evident; thus those few individuals who have mentioned some weak
hadiths in their books or who have shown inclination toward them are disregarded by the
Twelver Shia. Now, how can one ascribe the view of distortion to the Twelver Shia scholars?
Is this not an evident case of defamation, the like of which is certainly prohibited? How can
one ascribe distortion to a group that considers their doctrinal firmness and the duration of
their thoughts dependent on the Holy Qur’an?
Point Six
The Qur’an is different from other revealed books
One of the basic questions is the difference between the Qur’an and other revealed
books. Why is it claimed that the Qur’an was distorted while it is certain that other revealed
books have been distorted, so that some people who try to prove distortion in the Qur’an
argue that on the one hand it is certain that distortion took place in the previous books, while
on the other hand, according to widely transmitted hadiths narrated by both the Shia and the
Sunnis, whatever has taken place in the previous communities will certainly happen in this
community too. For instance, the Prophet (s) was quoted as saying, “Whatever had been in
the previous communities will similarly be in this community, patterning after it completely.”
[21]
So distortion must also have taken place in the Qur’an.
Investigating these types of hadiths and answering such a question will be dealt with
later on while discussing the doubts of those who maintain that the Holy Qur’an was
distorted. [22]
What we pursue under this point is that there exists a fundamental difference between
the Qur’an and other revealed books. Some people have said, “The distortion that has taken
place in the previous books is semantic distortion, and also subjective interpretation of the
revealed texts. The Qur’an suggests that such a distortion has taken place in the books of
previous communities, but does not suggest any additions or demolishment. [23]
Page 10 of 28
In addition, there are no proofs in the narrations and in the scholars indicating that
distortion with the meaning of addition or demolishment has taken place. The Qur’an
explicitly declares that the Torah, the Gospel, and other revealed books have been kept by the
scholars of previous communities. The Qur’an says, “Had they observed the Torah and the
Evangel, and what was sent down to them from their Lord, they would surely have drawn
nourishment from above them and from beneath their feet.”
The basic point is that this Holy Book is considered as a permanent and eternal
miracle, so it inevitably must be immune to distortion and change; contrary to other revealed
books that had not been considered as permanent miracles.
Point Seven
Stages and Stations of the Qur’an
One of the important points is which Qur’an or in other words which stage among the
available stages of the Qur’an is being discussed? As it is evident and is also understood from
the Holy Qur’an, this Holy Book has stages and stations.
First Station: The Preserved Tablet (Lawḥ Maḥfūẓ)
It is clear that this station cannot be distorted for it is not accessible to human beings.
This stage is before Allah and is immune from any harm.
Second Station: The revelation of the Qur’an through the Angel Gabriel (Jabra’īl) to
the Prophet (s)
This stage is, also, not distortable for the Angel Gabriel is infallible.
Third Station: The presentation of the Qur’an by the Prophet (s) to the public
The Prophet (s) has stated to the people the very same thing that Gabriel revealed to
the Prophet’s blessed heart, and the Prophet (s) expressed it to the people without any
addition or demolishment.
Evidently the Qur’an has not been subject to distortion in this station. It was collected
in its entirety during the Prophet’s lifetime, and as an ordered book it was gathered and
arranged; many individuals learnt it by heart, and in the next era the Qur’an was widely
transmitted from generation to generation.
Fourth Station: The copies of the Qur’an that represent the widely transmitted
Qur’an, in other words the written copies of the Qur’an whether manuscripts or printed,
represent the revealed truth that is called the Qur’an.
It is clear that distortion with the meaning of difference in recitation and the like is
probable in this fourth type. Also, the possibility of distortion – whether it be addition or
demolishment – seems probable in this station. What is disputed is that the Qur’an is a widely
transmitted revelation that has existed in all times as a single reality, a single object, and as
the revealed word of truth.
Page 11 of 28
In the holy verse “Indeed We have sent down the Reminder, and indeed We will
preserve it.” The pronoun ‘it’ refers to the revealed Qur’an which is nothing but one Qur’an
and one reality; other copies of the Qur’an represent it and can, undoubtedly, not be distorted.
It, therefore, becomes clear that the claim of one of the traditionalists [24] concerning
the meaning of preservation, “ḥifẓ”, namely that God will preserve His Book in the same
situation whereon He revealed it, as it is preserved in the lofty place before revelation, and
that the meaning of “ḥifẓ” does not refer to preservation on paper and notebooks, is an
invalid statement unsupported by evidence. Rather, the miracle of the Qur’an refutes it, for
the durability of the Qur’an in such an assumedly protected station in which distortion cannot
take place is not miraculous.
Point Eight
Rationally the Qur’an may be distorted but in actuality it was not
It is understood from the holy verse (the Qur’an, XV, 9) that rationally the Qur’an can
be distorted but God, the Exalted, has saved it from this danger. In the case that it could not
rationally ever be distorted, then it would be needless of being saved by God. However, God,
the Exalted, has disproved this merely rational probability by His certain promise to save it.
Point Nine
Does the argumentation of the Qur’an to prove it was not distorted necessitate
circularity in proof (dawr)?
Many great scholars have discussed a number of verses of the Qur’an in order to
prove that this Holy Book has not been distorted. Here we want to investigate whether or not
this argument necessitates circularity in proof.
Some people believe that argument of the holy verses necessitates circularity in proof.
They state two arguments and expositions for this:
Exposition 1: The negation of the distortion of the Book depends on the validity of
these verses, whereas the validity of these verses depends on the fact that the Book was not
distorted, negation of distortion is dependent on negation of distortion!
Exposition 2: Validity of the verses used in the argument is dependent upon the
negation of distortion, whereas negation of distortion is dependent upon the validity of these
verses; as a result, the validity of the holy verses is dependent upon the validity of the very
verses, and this is the very impossible circularity in proof of causality.
Different answers have been given to this doubt which we will investigate in this part
of the article.
1.In his valued book “al-Bayān” Ayatollah Khoei has written, “Those who do not
maintain the vicegerency of the Infallible Imams (a.s.) are unable to solve this doubt, but
those who have such a belief and consider them as peers to the Book can solve this doubt for
the Infallible Imams argued concerning the present Qur’an and approved and confirmed the
argument of their companions regarding the Book. Therefore, the present Qur’an – even if it
Page 12 of 28
has been distorted – because of the fact that it was argued by the Imams, has validity for
resorting and arguing.
There exists an objection to this answer because, firstly, this answer is useful for the
believers in the vicegerency of the Imams, while the answer should be given in such a way
that the followers of all branches can accept it.
Secondly, this answer in fact means the acceptance of doubt for, on its basis, arguing
that the Qur’an was not distorted no longer exists, rather it is arguing regarding the verses
associated with the confirmation of the Infallible Imams, a matter that is not only contrary to
the claim, but is also against the outward aspect of the holy hadith of Thaqlayn (Two
Weighty Things) from which it is well understood that the Qur’an is regarded as al-Thiql al-
Akbar (the greater weighty thing), and as an independent proof.
2.Those who claim that the Qur’an was distorted limit the range of this distortion to
certain verses that were indicated in some hadiths. They say that those verses, by which it is
argued that the Qur’an was not distorted, are not included in the distorted verses. In other
words, those who state distortion simultaneously believe that these verses have not been
distorted.
This answer, too, is not void of objection, for there are two opinions regarding
distortion:
a.Some people believe that according to some hadiths distortion has taken place in the
holy Qur’anic verses in certain cases. This opinion is valid.
b.Regardless of the hadiths, there exists non-detailed knowledge (ìlm ijmālī) to the
incidence of distortion in the book, and the range of this non-detailed knowledge includes
such verses by which it is argued to the non-existence of distortion in the Qur’an. Therefore,
this opinion is not valid.
3.To answer this problem it is claimed that these verses have not been distorted. [25]
This answer is also disputable. Because those who believe in distortion, and who, in the case
of which, claim that they have non-detailed knowledge that the Book was distorted, will not
be able to remove these verses from the scope of the non-detailed knowledge. In other words,
they cannot be included in those who arrived at consensus; otherwise, non-existence would
become necessary from the existence of their opinion.
4.This answer has been presented by my father (the late Grand Ayatollah Shaikh M.
Fazel Lankarani (May the Almighty’s peace rest upon him). [26] He believed that it should be
considered that the argument by the holy verses to non-existence opposes the group. If the
argument opposes a group that claims distortion in certain cases implied by the hadiths, then
there will not remain any opportunity for the dispute of circularity in proof, for these verses
are not included among them. And if the argument opposes those who claim non-detailed
knowledge that the Book was distorted, then two assumptions will exist:
· He who maintains distortion believes in the validity of the outward meaning of the
Book (ẓāhir) – even if it was distorted. In this case, no opportunity will be able to exist for
the dispute of circularity in proof, for the outward meaning of the verses will continue to
Page 13 of 28
remain valid. So the incidence of distortion is not an obstacle to the validity of the outward
meaning, and as a result the argument for the verses is free from dispute.
· He who maintains distortion considers this as an obstacle to the validity of the

outward meanings of the Book. In this case, he either claims non-detailed knowledge to the
incidence of distortion in the Book, or claims the probability (and not knowledge) of
distortion. In the first case, the verses cannot be argued even if they remain valid in the
assumption of distortion, for it has been proved in the “Principles of Jurisprudence” that the
outward meanings that are among the legal speculative evidences which lead to speculative
reasoning (imārāt sharìyyah ẓanniyyah) are valid provided that knowledge contradicting
them does not exist. So in this assumption one cannot argue by the holy verses.
In the second case, the mere probability of distortion, while the knowledge is missing,
does not prevent the validity of the verses therefore arguing with these verses is free from
dispute.
In this answer, too, in case non-detailed knowledge to the distortion exists, arguing
with the verses is not balanced.
5.It seems that distortion, like many other things, requires motivation, and since the
motivation to distort the Qur’an has been very great, these verses – in case we accept that
they were distorted – must have been distorted in such a way that demolishment takes place
in them so that one cannot argue by them to the non-incidence of distortion in the Book. For
instance, the phrase “and indeed We will preserve it” from the holy verse (the Qur’an, XV, 9)
should have been removed, or at least the word “it”, that can effectively be used to prove the
non-incidence of distortion, should have been omitted. Therefore, the existence of these
words and phrases is a clear indication for the non-existence of distortion, and brings about
knowledge and certainty that the verses were not distorted. As for the cases in which non-
detailed knowledge about distortion exists, since ordinary knowledge contradicting them
exists, these cases will be excluded from the scope of non-detailed knowledge.
Point Ten
Two Types of Claims in Distortion
It has become clear from the previous point that there are two claims regarding
distortion.
First: Some people have imagined that the scope of distortion includes only those
certain verses whose limits have been determined by the transmitted hadiths. So the rest of
the verses are out of the scope of distortion and alteration, and have remained intact, and can
consequently be used in argument, their outward meanings being valid.
This type of claim is usually made by those people whose source and proof regarding
distortion are certain traditions available in some hadith books.
Second: Some people maintain that the Holy Qur’an has briefly been distorted. In
other words they have non-detailed knowledge regarding the distortion of the Holy Book.
The reason and proof of those who have accepted this claim is the convention (i`tibār) and
the like. [27]
Page 14 of 28
Point Eleven
Investigating the reasonable/rational reason for the non-existence of distortion
It is understood from some of the words of the experts that they have resorted to
rational indication and also to the agreements of the wise to refute distortion (in the Qur’an).
In his book “Sa`d al-Su`ūd” Sayyid b. Ṭāwūs has explicitly stated that the invalidity
of distortion is what reason necessitated; however, some of the scholars have argued by the
convention of the wise.” [28]
As for rational indication, there are two ways to express this indication:
First way: This way has not been mentioned in Ayatollah Khoei’s statements [29] as an
independent rational indication; however, it is mentioned briefly here:
The probability of distortion is exclusively in three forms as below:
Form 1: Incidence of distortion by Abu Bakr and Ùmar before the caliphate of
Ùthman
This form is certainly invalid for it is not beyond the three probabilities below:
P1: Distortion was made unintentionally, as, after the demise of the Prophet (s),
these two individuals had been in charge of collecting the Qur’an. Due to the shortage of
information and the fact that the entire Qur’an was not received by these two, and also, due to
a certain amount of recklessness and lack of proficiency, certain verses were not accessed;
consequently, the Qur’an was distorted.
P2: The distortion was made by them intentionally, even the verses that had no
harm for their caliphate and leadership.
P3: The distortion was made intentionally, but regarding those verses that were
harmful for their leadership.
This probability has been emphasized by those who maintain distortion.
All of these probabilities are invalid and consequently are rejected.
The first probability is invalid from the two aspects below:
a.There is no doubt that the Prophet (s) encouraged the Muslims to memorize and
recite; and the companions were highly endeavored in these tasks; it is, therefore, certain that
the entire Qur’an was available at the time of these two companions, either collectedly or
dispersedly (available in the hearts or on parchments). At that time, the Arabs strangely
endeavored to memorize even the poems of the Age of Ignorance (àsr al-jāhiliyyah);
therefore, it cannot be accepted that they had not endeavored to such an extent regarding the
Qur’an.
Page 15 of 28
b.The invalidity of this probability becomes clear from the Hadith of Thaqalayn.
Because this tradition indicates that the Prophet (s) ordered the people to hold on to the Book
in his time. Evidently, resorting to the Qur’an as a collected book is not possible unless the
Book has not been distorted.
P2. Evidently, intentional distortion needs motivation; and since such a motivation
regarding the verses that have no harm for the leadership of Abu Bakr and Ùmar did not
exist, distortion on account of this reason is negated. In addition, if such distortion had been
made, those personalities who did not recognize the caliphate of Abu Bakr and Ùmar –
whose most important figures were the Commander of the Faithful (i.e. Imam Ali), Ḥaḍrat
Faṭimah (the Prophet’s daughter), and twelve figures from the Emigrants (muhājirīn) and the
Helpers (anṣār) – who have mentioned this issue as their defects and problems would have
referred to it in their argumentation, and such things do not exist in their statements and
arguments.
Form 2: The incidence of distortion was in the reign of Ùthman
This form is less probable than the previous one because, firstly, in the reign of
Ùthman, Islam had been disseminated to such an extent that the caliph did not possess the
relevant power to demolish any slightest thing from the Qur’an. Secondly, in case distortion
in the reign of Ùthman occurred concerning verses that were not related to the divine
leadership of the Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.), then no cause for distortion existed.
Regarding the verses related to divine leadership, it must be said that they have
certainly not been distorted for, if the Qur’an has had included verses that explicitly state the
caliphate and vicegerency of the Commander of the Faithful (a.s.), they would have been
disseminated among the people and the caliphate would not have been possessed by
Ùthman.
Thirdly, if Ùthman had distorted the Qur’an, this would have been the ideal pretext
for his opponents to justify their revolution and uprising against him, while they did not
mention it in their arguments.
Fourthly, if the Qur’an had been distorted by Ùthman, it would have been obligatory
for the Commander of the Faithful to return the Qur’an to its original form prevalent in the
time of the Prophet (s) as soon as he undertook the responsibility of leadership of the
Muslims; while such a thing did not happen. Therefore, the idea of a second format is
rejected and is invalid.
Form 3: Incidence of distortion after the caliphate of Ùthman and by the Umayyids
and their men
This is a probability that none of the scholars and historians has claimed.
Whereas no fourth form is probable, it is concluded that the incidence of distortion is

extravagant and is rejected rationally and historically.
It should be noted that this proof is not considered as an independent rational

judgment or predicate but rather that it is associated with historical analysis.
Page 16 of 28
Second way: In this way, two introductions are necessary: a. the Holy religion of
Islam is the last and the most perfect revealed religion for mankind up to the Day of
Resurrection; b. such a religion should have an eternal document forming the basis of
interrelation of its laws and commandments.
By attaching these two introductions, it can be inferred that the Divine Lawmaker
would have certainly kept this Book immune from being infected or polluted by distortion.
So, rationally, it is necessary for the Divine Lawmaker to keep this book immune from the
darkness of distortion.
This rational indication is disputable from the aspect that, as a suspended proposition,
reason and intellect dictate that, if the Qur’an wants to guide people in all their affairs until
the Day of Resurrection, it has to be immune from distortion; however, this perspective has
no use in the place of dispute, for here one is concerned with the incidence or non-incidence
of distortion, where wisdom, in itself, cannot independently interfere.
As for using rational convention and lifestyle to prove that the Qur’an was not
distorted, one of the scholars has written, “Distorting the words of an author and altering the
matters of a book is an unnatural process and an imposed and uncommon phenomenon;
therefore, the lifestyle and convention of the wise indicate disregarding the concept of
distortion. So the immunity of the Qur’an from distortion is a natural thing and is what
primitive rule necessitates.” [30]
But this proof holds true about books where no motivation or aims have existed to
cause distortion, while in the case of such a book as the Qur’an, the motivation of the pagans
and polytheists to cause distortion was extensive, and the observation may thus not be
included in this proof.
Point Twelve
The Most Explicit Verse of the Qur’an Proving that the Book has not been Distorted
A group of researchers have claimed that the most explicit verse of the Qur’an
proving that the Book has not been distorted is the following verse:
“Indeed it is an august book * Falsehood cannot approach from before it nor from
behind it, a [gradual] sending down [revelation] from One all-wise, all-laudable” [31]
It has even been claimed that the Qur’an interpreters have unanimously agreed that
this verse is the most explicit one denoting the non-incidence of distortion in the Qur’an. [32]
Through the ways below, it can be argued by referring to this verse that the Qur’an
was not distorted:
Way 1: Allah, the Exalted, has described the Holy Book as an august (àzīz) one.
Lexically it is clear that being august is true in the case that the book remains immune
from change and demolishment. [33]
Page 17 of 28
Way 2: In this holy verse, the nature and genus of falsehood was negated according to
the rules in such cases that it conveys generality. In other words the holy verse negates all
kinds and types of falsehood from this Holy Book.
Falsehood lexically means the thing which is corrupt. Evidently, distortion is among
its outstanding and clear cases.
Way 3: In this verse, to give reasons for the judgment, Allah mentions the fact that
since it is sent down by the One all-Wise, all-Laudable, falsehood cannot approach from
before it nor from behind it.
This explanation of the causes by itself clearly indicates that distortion and change are
not analogous with such a book that has been revealed from the All-knowing God.
Mirzā Husayn Nūrī [34], the traditionalist, has written, “Although change in the Qur’an
is a case of falsehood, falsehood in this verse bears a particular meaning; that is falsehood
brought about from the contradiction between the ordinances and the traditions.
Nūrī’s claim was commented in the following:
“To intend contradiction and to lie to another does not correspond to the Book
described as being sent down by the “One all-Wise.” [35]
In other words this description necessitates that all kinds of falsehood are absent from
this Book.
This answer requires a supplementary explanation:
The outward meaning of this holy verse is that this book is absolutely full of wisdom
(àzīz), and absolute superiority (ìzzah) necessitates that it is not limited to mere
contradiction, for, if the Book is immune from this aspect, superiority will become limited to
this very aspect.
The most important objection propounded to the argument to this verse is that this
argument contradicts the commentary stated by great Sunni and Shia scholars regarding it.
In other words, the commentary of the holy verse in such a case that indicates the
non-incidence of distortion has not been considered probable by any interpreter.
For instance, in his book al-Tibyān, Shaykh Ṭūsī has considered five probabilities in
interpreting the verse:
· The meaning of “no falsehood can approach” is that no doubts can approach it, and
that no contradiction occurs in it. That is, the Qur’an is the pure truth.
· Qutādah and Suddī have said, “The meaning is that the devil does not have the
power to demolish a truth from it or add a falsehood to it.”
· It means that there is not anything before the Qur’an or after it that can refute the
Qur’an.
Page 18 of 28
· Ḥasan has said, “The meaning is that falsehood cannot occur at its beginning or its
end.
· Falsehood cannot occur in what the Qur’an narrates from the past or what it foretells.
Sayyid Murtaḍā has said, “The best commentary that can be mentioned for this verse
is that the Qur’an is matchless; no word exists which is similar to it; no similarity exists
between the Qur’an and the books after it; this Book is not related to previous ones nor are
ensuing books related to it; that it is an independent word, lives by itself, is unparalleled in
itself; and is superior to any words that it is compared with.”
To answer this doubt it is said, firstly, that some of these interpretations, like the one
that was quoted from Qutādah and Suddī, correspond to the interpretation of the verse as
distortion.
Secondly, suppose that none of the interpretations have interpreted the verse as the
issue of distortion, but it has been proved in its place that one of the principles of
interpretation is the outward meaning of the verses of the Holy book; and the outward
meaning of the holy verse does not indicate this matter.
As for the opinion of the interpreters, no proofs exist indicating its validity and
reliability in interpreting the Qur’an, unless their words had been based on the statements of
the Infallible Figures.
Thirdly, traditions interpreting this verse that have stated some matters explaining the
meaning of falsehood do not intend to limit the meaning, rather they merely set about to
mention the cases.
Point Thirteen.
Does maintaining the idea of distortion necessitate spoiling the validity of the outward
meaning of the book?
Does maintaining distortion necessitate spoiling the validity of the outward meaning
of the book and the non-permissibility of using it in argument?
The question is reasonable provided that he, who claims distortion, has non-detailed
knowledge related to the incidence of distortion.
Some people have said that, in such an assumption, one can resort to the important
rational principle: lack of pretext, and argue to the outward meaning of the verse for any
verse about which distortion is considered probable.
In other words, to prove the validity of the distorted book, the tacit approval of the
Infallible Figures is not required, rather one can argue with the outward meaning of it.
This statement is reasonable in case of the wise being allowed to resort to this
principle regarding the probability of the existence of attached indication, while, according to
research, the wise allow resorting to this principle in cases where the addressee considers the
Page 19 of 28
existence of a separate indication probable, but regarding the attached indication one cannot
resort to this principle.
In the issue of distortion, what is considered probable, after non-detailed knowledge,

is the existence of an attached indication that has been removed due to distortion.
It is concluded that in the assumption of non-detailed knowledge regarding distortion,

there is no way to resort to the outward meaning of the Holy Book except through the tacit
approval of the Infallible Figures; and this is a matter that contradicts the outward meaning of
the Hadith of Thaqalayn.
Point Fourteen
The Hadith of Thaqalayn indicates that the Qur’an was not distorted
Among the traditions, the one that indicates the non-incidence of distortion in the
Qur’an is the frequently transmitted Hadith of Thaqalayn which has been narrated by some
33 thousand people among the great companions of the prophet (s) such as Ali, the
Commander of the Faithful, Abu Dhar, Abdullah b. Abbas, Abdullah b. Umar, Hudhayfah,
Abū Ayyūb Anṣārī [36] and has been mentioned by some 200 great Sunni scholars in their
books.
The text of this hadith, according to one of its chain of hadith transmitters it as
follows:
The Prophet (s) said, “Verily, I am leaving among you two weighty things, the Book
of Allah, and my Household; in it (i.e. the Book) exist guidance and light, so hold on to the
book of Allah and follow it and follow my Household; I remind you about my Household by
Allah” (and he repeated it three times). [37]
First method: To argue using this hadith regarding the non-incidence of distortion of
the book one can select two ways:
The first way becomes clear considering the six points below
1.The holy hadith indicates that it is possible to resort to this hadith until the day of
Resurrection.
2.Distortion in the book necessitates the impossibility of resorting to it.
3.Resorting to the Qur’an means to resort to all affairs that the Qur’an has
propounded. So resorting to certain cases like Āyāt al-Aḥkām (verses dealing with the
ordinances/laws) is not meant.
In other words the Qur’an’s aim is not merely explaining the rules and practical laws;
rather its aim is to guide people and to bring them out from darkness to light.
4.The aim of distortion is to conceal some of the truths, and to tone down some
fractions of the light of the Holy Book from all aspects and this cannot be an exhaustive light,
while the final goal that the Qur’an mentions for itself is to remove people from darkness to
Page 20 of 28
light and to help them reach out from human darkness to light and assist them to attain human
perfection, lofty material and spiritual degrees; an aim that is achieved through resorting to
the Qur’an.
5.Contrary to resorting to the Prophet’s Household (al-Ìtrah, Ahl al-Bayt), resorting

to the Qur’an is an issue the actualization or realization of which is possible merely through
approaching the Qur’an itself; that is the Qur’an that is at the disposal of the people, not the
Qur’an that exists before the Infallible and Pure Household and is kept by them, and is out of
public access.
6.It is inferred from the Hadith that resorting to the Book is not only possible but is
also obligatory. The affirmative sentence in the hadith is to issue a verdict.
It has been made clear in the discussions of Principles of Jurisprudence that it is

necessary in religious duties that the subject (mutaàllaq) is within the capability of the
persons responsible for religious duties.
If the Qur’an had been distorted, it follows that it could not be resorted to.
Second Method
It is understood from this holy hadith that either of these two Weighty Things is an
independent proof and a perfect reason that locates besides the other reason.
That the validity of none of them is dependent for approval on the other.
Of course this does not mean that each of them is sufficient to make man reach his
satisfactory level of perfection and to stop him from going astray and to eradicate darkness;
rather these consensuses are the result of these two weighty things. So, if any distortion had
taken place in the Book, its outward meanings would have become invalid. Therefore, those
who maintain distortion should believe that referring to a distorted book requires the approval
of the Infallible Figures, and this contradicts the outward meaning of the hadith.
The reason is that the outward meaning of the Book indicates the independence of any
of these two proofs. Basically, how can the validity of the Greater Weighty Thing be
dependent on the Minor Weighty Thing?
It is concluded from these two methods that, firstly, resorting to the Holy Book (i.e.
the Qur’an) is not only possible but is also a binding duty. Secondly, the Holy Book is
considered as independent proof and reason.
Obviously, the opinion of distortion contradicts each of these two matters.
Point Fifteen
Abrogation of recitation and causing to forget
The terms Naskh al-Tilāwah (abrogation of recitation) and Insā’ (to cause one to
forget) can be traced among the statements of the Sunni scholars. Some of them [38] maintain
Page 21 of 28
that the permissibility of Naskh al-Tilāwah is a non-detailed issue regarding whose incidence
exist rational and transmitted indications.
Here we intend to investigate whether these two terms contradict distortion or whether
the acceptance of the permissibility of abrogation necessitates the permissibility of distortion.
In the traditional books hadiths exist that made the great Sunni scholars justify them
as the abrogation of recitation. Among them is the tradition in which the discussion of stoning
has been mentioned.
Ibn Àbbās quoted from Ùmar that he said, “The verse of stoning is among the verses
revealed to the Prophet (s) which says: ‘Old men and old women in the case that they have
committed adultery, stone them.’ The Prophet (s) acted upon it in his time, and we too acted
upon it after the Prophet’s demise.” [39]
Zayd b. Thābit said that he had heard the Prophet (s) saying, “If a married man or
woman commits adultery, he or she must be stoned.”
Zayd has not claimed that this statement of the Prophet (s) is a revealed one (i.e. a
Qur’anic verse); however, Ùmar asked the Prophet (s) to write it in the Book. The Prophet
(s) did not answer him. [40]
The Sunni Muslims assumed that this verdict of statement of the Prophet (s) was
propounded as a Qur’anic verse but has been abrogated in recitation; its verdict however
remaining.
Some important objections mentioned below have been raised to this belief:
1.Abrogation – in all its kinds – requires an abrogating agent, but in these cases we
have no such an agent.
2.As has been proved in its place, the abrogation takes places only in the scope of
religious ordinances, while recitation is not a case of such ordinances. This has been solved.
[41]
What was meant by recitation is not its external existence, rather that permission of
recitation was meant that is considered as one of the religious ordinances.
3.What is the use of this kind of abrogation in which recitation was abrogated but the
mere ordinance that is what was meant by the verse has remained?
4.The most important objection was raised by Ayatollah Khoei. He said, “If this
abrogation of recitation has taken place in the time of the Prophet (s) and by his order –
although it does not necessitate the abrogation – since the tradition that indicates this matter
is attributed to this assumption, they are called “single individual narrations”; therefore, they
are not enough to be trusted; in addition it has been mentioned in some traditions that this
kind of tradition took place after the time of the Prophet (s). In case this abrogation was made
by the scholars after the demise of the Prophet (s), then this is exactly belief in distortion, and
acceptance of its incidence. [42]
As for what was mentioned in the issue of ‘stoning’, its refutation is very clear for the
Prophet (s) was meticulous in recording the Qur’anic verses, and emphatically ordered the
Page 22 of 28
revelation scribes to likewise be equally careful; so if stoning is among the Qur’anic verses,
how is it that the Prophet (s) did not order the scribes to write it, and why didn’t he answer
Ùmar?
So the issue of abrogation of recitation is an issue the refutation of which is very clear
and evident.
Even one of the contemporary Sunni scholars [43] has said, “Although it is rationally
allowed, such abrogation did not occur in the Book of Allah.”
Having primarily accepted abrogation in recitation, Ibn Ḥazm Andulusī has justified
the issue at the end of his statement in such a way that cannot be related to the Divine
Revelation. [44]
Point 16
The Shia cannot believe in distortion
The Shia not only do not maintain that the Qur’an was distorted, but also cannot
basically hold such a belief for the most important evidence forming the foundation of the
Shia belief is the holy verse of Purification (The Qur’an, XXXIII, 33):
“Indeed Allah desires to repel all impurity from you, O People of the Household, and
purify you with a thorough purification.”
It has been proved in its place that this verse has a clear significant implication to the
infallibility of the Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.), an infallibility that is the most important qualification
for the leadership and caliphate of the Muslims. In the case that a person believes in
distortion within the Qur’an, he cannot resort to this verse to prove infallibility. The main aim
of this holy verse becomes clear when we accept that the Qur’an is an arranged book
beginning with the Surah al-Hamd, and that its compilation was completed during the time of
the Prophet (s), and has not been harmed in any subsequent events, and that each verse is
situated in its appropriate position so that if any verse is moved to another place, Allah’s goal
will not be achieved. In this holy verse, after explaining the duties of the Prophet’s wives,
Allah, the Exalted, has mentioned certain duties for the Infallible Household (a.s.) and points
out that they have duties peculiar to themselves. In any case, if distortion is considered
probable in these kinds of verses, no foundation for the Twelver Shia doctrine would remain.
[45]
Point 17
Studying the traditions denoting distortion
The most important evidence for those who maintain distortion are specific traditions
mentioned by the Shia and the Sunnis in their books. As calculated by a researcher, the
number of these traditions amount to 1122 hadiths. One of the great scholars has been
convinced that these hadiths have somehow been widely transmitted (mutawātir); meaning
that although many of these hadiths are considered weak in their chain of narrators, their
multiplicity is to such an extent that brings about certainty that some of them are authentic
and that one cannot claim them all to be false. Those who maintain distortion have inferred
Page 23 of 28
from these traditions that in some cases of the Holy Book distortions and demolishment
occurred.
Distrusting these traditions, some great scholars have raised objections from two
aspects:
· From the aspect of the chain of narrators; and also the books from which these
traditions were cited
· From the aspect of denotation
Now we must explain each of these aspects.
First aspect: In a remarkable number of these traditions, one of the narrators in the
chain of narrators is Aḥmad b. Muhammad al-Sayyārī who was described as “having a
corrupt religion” and “weak in narrating the hadiths” by the experts in the study of narrators.
(Ìlm al-Rijāl) Najāshī [46] accuses him of being an extremist (ghālī); Ibn Ghaḍā’irī introduced
[47]
him as a pervert.
Another narrator in the chain of narrators in these traditions is Yūnus b. Ẓibyān about whom
one comment is that he is very weak (i.e. unreliable), and that a mixture (of truth and
falsehood) exists in all of his books. Ibn Ghaḍā’irī introduced him as an extremist, a liar, and
a hadith forger. [48]
The third narrator in the chain of narrators of these traditions is Ali b. Aḥmad Kūfī
who was introduced, by the experts in the study of narrators, as weak, corrupt in narrating,
and even from among the perverted extremists. [49]
So it becomes clear that those who narrate and explain these traditions are among
weak narrators whose narrations are invalid and unreliable.
In addition, it should be noted that the books in which these traditions are contained
are mostly unreliable and void of validity.
a.Some of these traditions have been cited from a treatise ascribed to Sa`d b.
Àbdullah Ashàrī, which has at the same time been ascribed to Nu`mānī and Sayyid
Murtaḍā; therefore, the identity of its forger or compiler is not clear and consequently none
of the experts in the study of narrators has recognized it as a reliable source.
b.Some of these traditions have been cited from the Book of Sulaym b. Qays al-Hilālī
about which Shaykh Mufīd has commented, “This is a book that cannot be relied upon; it is
not permissible to follow the suggestions in many cases in this book; confusion and deceit
have occurred in this book; the pious must avoid referring to this book.” [50]
c.The third book among the sources of these kind of traditions is “Kitāb al-Tanazzī wa
al-Taḥrīf”, also known as “Kitāb al-Qarā’āt” compiled by Aḥmad b. Muhammad al-Sayyāfrī,
who – as mentioned before – was described as weak and unreliable by many experts of the
study of narrators.
Page 24 of 28
d.Some of these traditions have been cited from the Literary Commentary by Abi al-
Jārūd, who was cursed by Imam Ja`far Ṣādiq (a.s.); in addition, Kathīr b. Àyyash, a weak
narrator, is contained among the chain of narrators of this book.
e.Some of these traditions have been cited from “Tafsīr Ali b. Ibrāhīm Qummī”, a
commentary ascribed to him which is in fact a collection of his dictations to his disciple Abu
al-Faḍl b. Àbbās b. Muhammad al-Àlawī, which, additionally, is mixed with the
commentary of Abi al-Jārūd.
f. One of the sources of these traditions is “Kitāb al-Istighāthah” by Ali b. Aḥmad al-
Kūfī who was described as a liar and accused of being an extremist by Ibn Ghaḍā’irī.
g.Some of these traditions have been cited from “al-Iḥtijāj” by Ṭabrisī, and as most of
the traditions in this book are void of chains of narrators, this book cannot be referred to as a
book of hadith.
h.Many of these traditions have been mentioned in the book “al-Kāfī”, but the mere
existence of a tradition in this book does not authenticate it nor mean that it can be
approached accordingly.
It has been claimed that among the 16199 hadiths available in the book al-Kāfī” 5172
hadiths are authentic (ṣaḥīḥ), 144 hadiths are good (ḥasan), 2128 hadiths are reliable
(muwaththaq), 302 hadiths are strong, and the rest 7480 hadiths are weak (ḍa`īf). [51]
Explanation on the second aspect:
As far as denotation is concerned, these traditions do not have the same content, and
are divided in many groups:
a.Some of these traditions deal with semantic distortion which is irrelevant to our
discussion.
b.Some of these traditions are related to difference in recitation which is irrelevant to

our discussion.
c.Some of these traditions deal with explanation and commentary pertaining to a

certain verse; some people have wrongly considered the interpretative texts as part of the
Holy Qur’an. For instance, regarding the commentary of the verse “They are the ones whom
Allah knows as to what is in their hearts. So let them alone, and advise them, and speak to
them concerning themselves far-reaching words.” Through his chain of narrators Shaykh al-
Kulaynī has narrated that Imam Mūsā b. Ja`far recited the verse up to the phrase “So let them
alone” and added “Indeed to whom there has gone beforehand the promise of cure, and the
promise of punishment” and then recited the rest of the verse. [52]
The traditionalist, Nūrī, has commented, “The appearance of the traditions indicates
that this addition is of the Qur’an, and not the commentary.” [53]
However, Allamah Majlisī and other scholars have explicitly stated that this sentence
in an interpretative one.
Page 25 of 28
d.Traditions that denote that the blessed names of the Commander of the Faithful,
Imam Ali, and other Infallible Imams were mentioned in some verses of the Book are in fact
dealing with the explanation and interpretation of the verses and do not denote that the names
of the Imams were part of the Qur’an nor that they have been removed.
e.Some traditions indicate that the names of some of the individuals of the tribe of
Quraysh had been mentioned and were probably omitted by distorters with the exception of
the name of Abu Lahab.
Two objections exist with regard to these kinds of traditions:
First: There is contradiction between these traditions, for some of them state the
number of the demolished verses to be seventy, whereas others, claim there are seven.
Second: The contents of these traditions testify to their own falsehood. Basically, how
can the existence of the name of Abū Lahab be justified?
f.Some traditions denote that after the demise of the Prophet (s) some of the words
became altered and replaced with others; in other words, these traditions denote the incidence
of distortion, both addition and demolishment.
This group opposes consensus, for the Muslims have unanimously agreed that even a
single letter has not been added to the Qur’an.
g.Some traditions dealing with the affairs of Imam Mahdi (may Allah hasten his
advent) denote that after his reappearance the Imam will oblige the people to recite the
Muṣḥaf of Imam Ali that is before him.
These traditions indicate that a difference exists between Imam Ali’s Muṣḥaf and the
present Qur’an; however, any difference is not quantitative but is rather in the sequence of the
surahs and verses and in the existence of some explanations.
h.Some traditions denote the incidence of demolishment in the Holy Book, and are
divided into the three groups below:
One: Traditions indicating that the real number of the Qur’anic verses is in excess of
the current number
Two: Traditions indicating that the number of the verses of some surahs is smaller
than the real amount
Three: Traditions indicating the demolishment of a word or verse
To resolve these doubts it must be said:
Firstly, these traditions contradict the Qur’an and must be disregarded.
Secondly, there exist within these groups traditions that reject such content.
Page 26 of 28
Thirdly, in the case that an authentic hadith exists among these traditions, it is
considered as a single individual narration (khabar al-wāḥid) to which, in such cases, it
cannot be resorted to, according to the rules.
Fourthly, some of these traditions suggest omission and removal of the blessed names
of the Imams; as was previously mentioned, these kinds of traditions must be considered
interpretative ones or ones that state cases.
All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds
Footnotes
1.This article was first presented for a group of Islamic

Studies researchers. Here the author is referring to them.
2.The Qur’an, XXII, 11
3.Al-Kashshāf, vol. 2, p. 146
4.The Qur’an, IV, 46
5.Mufradāt Gharī al-Qur’an, p. 112
6.Al-Tafsīr al-Kbīr, vol. 6, p. 117 (Old Print)
7.Al-Bayān, p. 215
8.The Qur’an, IV, 46
9.Al-Kāfī, vol. 8, p. 53; and al-Wāfī, at the end of Kitāb al-Ṣalāh
10.Àwālī al-La’ālī, vol. 4, p. 104
11.Ālā’ al-Raḥmān, by Balāghī, p. 15
12.Majma` al-Bayān, vol. 1, p. 15
13.Al-Tibyān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an, the Introduction
14.Majma` al-Bayān, vol. 1, p. 15
15.Sa`d al-Su`ūd, p. 144
16.Ibid, p. 193
17.Tafsīr al-Ṣāfī, vol. 1, p. 51
18.Ālā’ al-Raḥmān, p. 26
19.Iẓhār al-Ḥaqq, vol. 2, p. 129
20.Kashf al-Ghiṭā’, p. 299
21.Biḥār al-Anwār, (Bāb iftirāq al-Ummah Ba`d al-Nabiyy) vol. 8,
p. 4
22.See al-Bayān, p. 221
23.Ṣiyānat al-Qur’ān àn al-Taḥrīf, p. 94
24.Faṣl al-Khiṭāb, p. 360
25.Ukdhūbat Taḥrīf al-Qur’an, p. 4
26.Madkhal At-Tafsir, p. 202
27.For further explanation see: Madkhal At-Tafsir, p. 292
28.Goftār-e Āsān dar Nafy-e Taḥrīf-e Qur’an
29.Al-Bayān, p. 215
30.Goftār-e Āsān dar Nafy-e Taḥrīf-e Qur’an, p. 12
31.The Qur’an, ?, 41-42
32.Ṣiyānat al-Qur’ān àn al-Taḥrīf, p. 33
Page 27 of 28
36.Ālā’ al-Raḥmān, p. 44
37.Al-Sunan, by Dārimī, vol. 2, p. 431
38.Al-Iḥkām fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām, by Amudī vol. 3, p. 154
39.Musnad Aḥmad b. Ḥanbal, vol. 1, p. 47
40.Muḥallā, by Ibn Ḥazm, vol. 1, p. 235
41.Al-Iḥkām fī Uṣūl al-Aḥkām, by Amudī vol. 3, p. 155
43.Fatḥ al-Mannān fī Naskh al-Qur’an, p. 224
44.Muḥallā, by Ibn Ḥazm, vol. 10, p. 58
45.For further explanation see: Ahl al-Bayt yā Chehre-ha-ye
Derakhshān
46.Rijāl al-Najāshī, p. 58
47.Qāmūs al-Rijāl, vol. 1, p. 403
48.Khulaṣat al-Rijāl, p. 266
49.Dirāsāt fī al-Ḥadīth wa al-Muḥaddithīn, p. 198
50.Taṣḥīḥ al-I`tiqād, p. 72
51.Dirāsāt fī al-Ḥadīth wa al-Muḥaddithīn, p. 137
52.Al-Kāfī (Al-Rawḍah), vol. 8, p. 184
http://www.lankarani.com/eng/mes/024.php
Page 28 of 28

Quran: The Non-Distorted Divine Document

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Quran: The Non-Distorted Divine Document

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Qur’an: The Non-Distorted Divine Document

Written by: M. J. Fazel Lankarani

Translated and edited by: Ali H. Al-Hakim

Qur’an: The Non-Distorted Divine Document.......................................................................1

The term taḥrīf (distortion)

Usages and kinds of distortion

In other words, an addition definitely takes place, or a demolishment definitely takes

1.Verbal distortion: this is concerned with demolishment, addition, change, and

3.Positional distortion: this means to register a verse or surah in a position contrary to

6.Conversional distortion: It refers to the case of changing a word to another whether

Brief and Detailed Distortion

As mentioned before, distortion is either brief or detailed. What is under discussion

A single individual narration (khabar al-Wāḥid) is not enough to prove distortion.

Two points should be taken into consideration in advance:

Here are the comments of the great Twelver Shia scholars:

The Qur’an is different from other revealed books

Stages and Stations of the Qur’an

First Station: The Preserved Tablet (Lawḥ Maḥfūẓ)

Rationally the Qur’an may be distorted but in actuality it was not

· He who maintains distortion considers this as an obstacle to the validity of the

Two Types of Claims in Distortion

Investigating the reasonable/rational reason for the non-existence of distortion

The probability of distortion is exclusively in three forms as below:

This probability has been emphasized by those who maintain distortion.

All of these probabilities are invalid and consequently are rejected.

The first probability is invalid from the two aspects below:

Form 2: The incidence of distortion was in the reign of `Uthman

Whereas no fourth form is probable, it is concluded that the incidence of distortion is

It should be noted that this proof is not considered as an independent rational

Nūrī’s claim was commented in the following:

This answer requires a supplementary explanation:

In the issue of distortion, what is considered probable, after non-detailed knowledge,

It is concluded that in the assumption of non-detailed knowledge regarding distortion,

2.Distortion in the book necessitates the impossibility of resorting to it.

5.Contrary to resorting to the Prophet’s Household (al-`Itrah, Ahl al-Bayt), resorting

It has been made clear in the discussions of Principles of Jurisprudence that it is

Obviously, the opinion of distortion contradicts each of these two matters.

Abrogation of recitation and causing to forget

The Shia cannot believe in distortion

Studying the traditions denoting distortion

· From the aspect of denotation

Now we must explain each of these aspects.

Explanation on the second aspect:

b.Some of these traditions are related to difference in recitation which is irrelevant to

c.Some of these traditions deal with explanation and commentary pertaining to a

Two objections exist with regard to these kinds of traditions:

Three: Traditions indicating the demolishment of a word or verse

To resolve these doubts it must be said:

Firstly, these traditions contradict the Qur’an and must be disregarded.

All praise belongs to Allah, Lord of all the worlds

1.This article was first presented for a group of Islamic

S-ar putea să vă placă și