Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Technical Communication
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The analytic solutions for the dynamic response of a circular lined tunnel with an imperfect interface sub-
Received 15 July 2013 jected to cylindrical P-waves are presented in the paper. The wave function expansion method was used
Received in revised form 6 August 2013 and the imperfect interface was modeled with a spring model. The interface separating the liner from the
Accepted 28 August 2013
surrounding rock was considered to be homogeneous imperfect. The dynamic stress concentration fac-
Available online 23 September 2013
tors (DSCF) of the rock and liner were evaluated and discussed. The effects of incident wave’s frequency,
bonding conditions and distance between the wave source and the tunnel were examined. The results
Keywords:
showed that the low-frequency incident wave leads to a higher DSCF than the high-frequency incident
Circular lined tunnel
Imperfect interface
wave. The bonding conditions have a great effect on the dynamic response of the lined tunnel. When
Cylindrical P-waves the bond is extremely weak, the resonance scattering phenomenon can be observed. When the distance
Dynamic stress concentration factor between the wave source and the tunnel, depending on frequency of the incident wave, is considered as
large, the cylindrical wave can be treated as a plane wave. Limiting cases were considered and good
agreement with the solutions available in the literature was obtained.
Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0266-352X/$ - see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.009
166 C. Yi et al. / Computers and Geotechnics 55 (2014) 165–171
the traction and displacement on the interface are continuous. where a2 and b2 are respective wave numbers of P-wave and SV-
However, the bond is not always perfect because there may be wave in liner; Cn and Mn are uncertain constants.
ðrÞ
microcracks or interstitial media in the interface sometimes. The There are two refracted waves of P-wave /3 and SV-wave
primary goal of this paper is to study the effects of boundary ðrÞ
w3 that propagate towards the inside of liner from its outer
conditions and curvature of the incident wave on the dynamic
boundary. Two refracted waves can be expressed in the cylindrical
response of a lined tunnel subjected to a cylindrical P-wave.
coordinate system of (O1, h) as Eq. (4):
2. Governing equations X
1 9
>
Dn Hnð2Þ ða2 rÞ cos nheixt >
ðrÞ
/3 ¼ >
=
n¼0
We consider an infinitely long lined circular tunnel of outer X1 ; ð4Þ
ðrÞ ixt >
>
radius b and inner radius a in infinite rock mass with the center w3 ¼ Nn Hð2Þ
n ðb2 rÞ sin nhe >
;
of the tunnel located at O1. A harmonic dilatational line source is n¼0
located at O2, which is at a distance r0 from O1, see Fig. 1. The har- where Hnð2Þ is the second kind of Hankel function in nth order, which
monic waves generated by the harmonic dilatational line source at represents inwards-propagating cylindrical wave. Dn and Nn are
O2 can be expressed in terms of the displacement potential as: uncertain constants.
ð1Þ
/ðiÞ ¼ u0 H0 ða1r Þeixt ; ð1Þ To obtain the total displacement potential in rock mass, it is
needed to transform the incident wave in ðO2 ; hÞ coordinates into
(i)
where / is the displacement potential of the incident P-wave, a1 is the (O1, h) coordinates. According to the addition theorem of Han-
the wave number of P-wave in rock mass, x = 2pf is the circular kel function, there are two expressions for the transformation:
frequency of incident wave with f being the frequency of incident If r P r0,
ð1Þ
P-wave, u0 is the amplitude of incident P-wave, H0 is the first kind
X
1
of Hankel function in 0th order and i is the unit of complex. In this Hn ðarÞeinh ¼ ð1Þm J m ðar0 ÞHnþm ðarÞeiðnþmÞh ð5Þ
presentation, we have a cylindrical wave propagating outwards 1
from the source at O2 in the ðO2 ;
hÞ coordinates. Only the 0th order
Hankel function is required because of the axial symmetric nature If r 6 r0,
of the source [4]. X
1
When the incident P-wave meets the circular lined tunnel, there Hn ðarÞeinh ¼ ð1Þm Hm ðar 0 ÞJ nþm ðarÞeiðnþmÞh : ð6Þ
1
are two waves reflected from the interface of the rock and the liner.
One is the reflected P-wave /1
ðrÞ
and the other is the reflected We focus on the dynamic response of the area of r 6 b, so Eq. (6) is
suitable for coordinate transformation of this problem. Therefore,
ðrÞ
SV-wave w1 . Both reflected waves can be expressed in the cylin- Eq. (1) can be written as:
drical coordinate system of (O1, h) as Eq. (2): ð1Þ
9 /ðiÞ ¼ u0 H0 ða1r Þeixt
X1
ðrÞ ixt >
>
/1 ¼ An Hð1Þ
n ð a1 rÞ cos nhe >
=
X1
3. Boundary conditions
for modeling the imperfect interface [25–28]. The model assumes We omit the time factor of eixt, stress in rock mass can be ex-
that tractions are continuous but displacements are discontinuous pressed as Eq. (13):
across the interface. In particular, the model assumes that the nor- 9
1 h
X i
mal and the shear tractions are proportional to the corresponding rrr1 ¼ 2l1 r2 u0 ð1Þn en Hð1Þ ð1Þ ð3Þ ð3Þ >
>
n ða1 r 0 Þe11 ða1 rÞ þ An e11 ða1 rÞ þ Bn e12 ðb1 rÞ cosnh >
>
>
displacement discontinuities through two stiffness parameters. n¼0 > >
X1 h i >
=
Using this concept, the boundary conditions to be applied at the rhh1 ¼ 2l1 r2 u0 ð1Þn en Hð1Þ ð1Þ ð3Þ ð3Þ
n ða1 r 0 Þe21 ða1 rÞ þ An e21 ða1 rÞ þ Bn e22 ðb1 rÞ cosnh : ð13Þ
>
>
interface of the liner and the rock mass can be described as Eq. (10). n¼0
1 h i >
>
X >
>
9 rrh1 ¼ 2l1 r2 u0 ð1Þn en Hð1Þ ð a r Þe ð1Þ
ða rÞ þ A e ð3Þ
ð a rÞ þ B e ð3Þ
ðb rÞ sinnh >
>
1 0 41 1 n 41 1 n 42 ;
ur1 ur2 ¼ rkrr1
n 1
r >
> n¼0
=
uh1 uh2 ¼ rkrh1
h ; ð10Þ Displacement in rock mass can be expressed as Eq. (14):
rrr1 ¼ rrr2 >
>
;
rrh1 ¼ rrh2 1 h
X i 9
>
ur1 ¼ r 1 u0 ð1Þn en Hð1Þ ð1Þ ð3Þ ð3Þ >
n ða1 r 0 Þe71 ða1 rÞ þ An e71 ða1 rÞ þ Bn e72 ðb1 rÞ cos nh >
=
where kr and kh are normal and tangential spring constants respec- n¼0
1 h i :
X >
tively. The subscripts of 1 and 2 denote the components in rock and u0 ð1Þn en Hð1Þ ð1Þ ð3Þ ð3Þ >
n ða1 r 0 Þe81 ða1 rÞ þ An e81 ða1 rÞ þ Bn e82 ðb1 rÞ sin nh ;
uh1 ¼ r1 >
liner respectively. n¼0
90 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b 90
5 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b
120 60 2.0 120 60
Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b
4
Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b 1.5 Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b
3 150 30 α1a=0.1 150 30 α1a=0.1
1.0
2 R=b r0=5a R=a r0 =5a
1 0.5
DSCF
DSCF
0 180 0 0.0 180 0
1
0.5
2
210 330 1.0 210 330
3
4 1.5
5 240 300 240 300
2.0
270 270
(a) (b)
90 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b 90
Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b
1.5 120 60 1.8 120 60
Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b
Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b
1.0 1.2
150 30 150 30 α1a=2.0
α1a=2.0
0.5 R=b r0=5a 0.6 R=a r0=5a
DSCF
DSCF
0.0 180 0 0.0 180 0
0.5 0.6
210 330 210 330
1.0 1.2
(c) (d)
Fig. 2. DSCF of Hoop stress in the rock and liner for the case of r0 = 5a. (a) DSCF of Hoop stress in the rockm, (b) DSCF of Hoop stress in the liner, (c) DSCF of Hoop stress in the
rock, and (d) DSCF of Hoop stress in the liner.
5. Numerical results and discussions inner radii of the liner is 1.2, i.e. the value of b/a is 1.2. A Fortran
program was written to get the numerical results.
It is important to solve the dynamic stress concentration factor When the distance between the line source and the tunnel is 5a,
on the edge of tunnel and liner impacted by incident harmonic i.e. r0 = 5a, the distribution of DSCF in the rock mass at r = b and the
P-wave. In this problem the main task is to study the DSCF in the DSCF distribution in the liner at r = a due to the low-frequency and
rock and at the edge of the liner. Usually, the hoop stress is larger the high-frequency incident waves are shown in Fig. 2. When the
than the radial stress in the lined tunnel subjected to the stress frequency of incident wave is low, there are four peak values of
wave, so only the DSCF of hoop stress is considered in the paper. DSCF in the rock and the liner, see Fig. 2(a) and (b). Increasing of
The dynamic stress concentration factor is determined by spring stiffness leads to decreasing DSCF in the rock and increasing
ðiÞ
normalizing rhh by the magnitude of the radial stress rrr of the DSCF in the liner. When the incident wave’s frequency is high, the
incident wave at the same point in the medium with no opening. distribution of DSCF is complicated, see Fig. 2(c) and (d). At the
The incident radial stress in terms of incident wave potential is: boundary of rock mass, the difference of maximum of DSCF with
h i different spring stiffnesses is slight and the location of the peak
ð1Þ 2 ð1Þ
rðiÞ 2 ixt ;
rr ¼ l1 a1 u0 H 2 ða1 r Þ þ ð1 k ÞH 0 ða1 r Þ e
ð18Þ values of DSCF is different with different spring stiffnesses, see
Fig. 2(c). At the inner boundary of the liner, Kr = Kh = 1.0l1/b yields
2
where k ¼ 2ð1m1 Þ
and m1 is Poisson’s ratio of rock. the largest DSCF, see Fig. 2(d). It can be observed that the low-
12m1
The dynamic stress concentration factor of hoop stress is: frequency incident wave leads to a higher DSCF in rock than the
high-frequency incident wave via the comparison of Fig. 2(a) and
rhh ¼ rhh =rrrðiÞ : ð19Þ (c).
When the distance between the line source and the tunnel is
To get a general solution, some dimensionless parameters are 10a, i.e. r0 = 10a, the distributions of DSCF due to the low frequency
defined. CP1 and CP2 are the velocities of P-wave in rock and liner and the high frequency incident waves are shown in Fig. 3. The dis-
respectively and CP1/CP2 = 1.5. m1 = 0.25 and m2 = 0.2 are Poisson’s tribution of DSCF is similar to the case of r0 = 5a. When the fre-
ratios of rock and liner respectively. l1 and l2 are the shear modu- quency of incident wave is low, the peak value of DSCF is smaller
lus of rock and liner respectively and l1/l2=2.9. These parameters than the case of r0 = 5a. The locations of two peak values of DSCF
can be regarded as a concrete liner structure in rock mass. Three in the rock in the case of r0 = 10a are closer to h = p/2 and h = 3p/
sets of dimensionless spring stiffnesses are considered and they 2 compared to the case of r0 = 5a when the frequency of the inci-
are Kr = Kh = 10.0l1/b, 1.0l1/b and 0.1l1/b. The ratio of outer and dent wave is low.
C. Yi et al. / Computers and Geotechnics 55 (2014) 165–171 169
90 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b 90 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b
4 120 60
Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b 1.5 120 60 Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b
3 Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b
150 30 α1a=0.1 1.0
2 150 30
α1a=0.1
R=b r0 =10a
1 0.5 R=b r0 =10a
DSCF
DSCF
0 180 0 0.0 180 0
1
0.5
2 210 330 210 330
1.0
3
(a) (b)
90 90 Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b
Kr=Kθ=10.0μ1/b
1.5 1.6 120 60
120 60 Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b Kr=Kθ=1.0μ1/b
Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b 1.2 Kr=Kθ=0.1μ1/b
1.0
150 30 150 30
α1a=2.0 0.8 α1a=2.0
0.5 R=b r0=10a R=a r0=10a
0.4
DSCF
DSCF
0.4
0.5
0.8 210 330
210 330
1.0
1.2
(c) (d)
Fig. 3. DSCF of Hoop stress in the rock and liner for the case of r0 = 10a. (a) DSCF of Hoop stress in the rock, (b) DSCF of Hoop stress in the liner, (c) DSCF of Hoop stress in the
rock, and (d) DSCF of Hoop stress in the liner.
5 5
4 4
kr=kθ=10.0μ1/b
kr=kθ=10.0μ1 /b
3 3 kr=kθ=1.0μ1/b
kr=kθ=1.0μ1 /b
DSFC
DSFC
kr=kθ=0.1μ1/b
kr=kθ=0.1μ1 /b
2 2 R=b r0=10a θ=π
R=b r0 =5a θ=π
1 1
0 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
α1a α1a
(a) (b)
Fig. 4. DSCF of Hoop stress in the rock vs. the frequency of incident wave at h = p. (a) r0 = 5a and (b) r0 = 10a.
The variation of DSCF of the rock mass at h = p and r = b with the is extremely imperfect (Kr = Kh = 0.1l1/b), the results show that
change of the incident wave’s frequency is shown in Fig. 4 for the there are several peak values of DSCF in the rock, which is due
cases of r0 = 5a and r0 = 10a. The results indicate that DSCF at to the resonance scattering as observed by Rajabi and Hashe-
h = p is high when the incident wave’s frequency is low, which minejad [33]. This phenomenon is very unique for the case of
is quite different from the results of plane incident wave. The the extremely imperfect interface [34]. Thus, the effect of an
analysis of plane incident wave shows that the DSCF at h = p is imperfect interface has a pronounced effect on the scattering of
always small for the case of perfect interface [4]. When the bond elastic waves.
170 C. Yi et al. / Computers and Geotechnics 55 (2014) 165–171
2.5 3.5
3.0
2.0
2.5
α1a=0.5
1.5 2.0
DSCF
α1a=1.0
DSCF
α1a=1.5
α1a=0.5 1.5
1.0
α1a=1.0 θ =π
α1a=1.5
1.0
0.5
θ=π/2 0.5
0.0 0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
r0 /a r0 /a
(a) (b)
Fig. 5. DSCF of Hoop stress in the rock vs. r0.
2.8
5
2.4 Plane wave,θ=π/2
Cylindrical wave,θ=π/2 4 Kr=Kθ
2.0 Plane wave,θ=π Kr=Kθ=100.0 μ1/b
Cylindrical wave,θ=π
DSCF
1.6 3
DSCF
1.2
2
0.8
1
0.4
0.0 0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 1 2 3 4
α1a α1a
(a) (b)
Fig. 6. DSCF vs. the frequency of incident wave.
In order to investigate the effect of the distance between the r0 = 2a was taken as an example. The numerical result for the case
line source and the tunnel, the variation of DSCF of the boundary of Kr = Kh = + 1, as shown in Fig. 6(b), accurately reproduced the
of rock mass at h = p/2 and h = p with the change of r0 is shown curve for the case of r0 = 2a displayed in Fig. 7.6 in Chapter 3 of
in Fig. 5. Three incident frequencies were investigated and the the reference [4]. The results also indicate that the interface is close
spring stiffness was set as Kr = Kh = 10.0l1/b. The results show that to perfect bonded interface when the stiffness of the spring model
the value of DSCF is constant when r0 is large; the value of DSCF is Kr = Kh = 100.0l1/b, especially for the high frequency incident
depends on the frequency of the incident wave, which implies that waves.
the cylindrical wave can be treated as a plane wave when the dis-
tance between the line source and the tunnels is large.
In order to investigate the validity of the spring model and cal- 6. Conclusions
culations, a modified FORTRAN program was used to calculate the
DSCF of the circular lined tunnel with perfect interface impacted by The influence of the boundary imperfections and the curvature
plane P-waves. The values of parameters of the tunnel and the liner of the incident wave on the dynamic response of the lined tunnel
are same to those in Table 4.3 for Case I in Chapter 3 of the refer- subjected to a cylindrical incident P-wave was studied with wave
ence [4]. The numerical results, as shown in Fig. 6(a), accurately function expansion method and the spring model for the imperfect
reproduced the curves for the case of b/a = 1.2 displayed in interface. The distribution of DSCF around the lined tunnel and the
Fig. 4.5 (a) in Chapter 3 of the reference [4]. According to the anal- variation of DSCF with the change of the frequency and the curva-
ysis above, the cylindrical wave can be treated as a plane wave ture of the incident wave were presented. The results show that
when the distance between the line source and the tunnels is large. increasing spring stiffness leads to a decreasing DSCF in the rock
The case of r0 = 1000a and Kr = Kh = 10.0l1/b was studied. The and an increasing DSCF in the liner. But the dynamic response of
results indicate that DSCFs at h = p/2 and h = p induced by the lined tunnel to the high-frequency incident wave is compli-
cylindrical P-waves are close to those induced by plane P-waves, cated due to the boundary imperfections. When the bond is
see Fig. 6(a). Pao and Mow [4] investigated the dynamic response extremely weak, the phenomenon of resonance scattering can be
of circular tunnel without liner subjected to cylindrical P-waves. observed, which can induce a large DSCF in the rock mass. The
This case is equivalent to define Kr = Kh = + 1 and the same values curvature of the incident wave also has a great effect on the
of parameters for tunnels and liners in present paper. The case of dynamic response of the lined tunnel. The cylindrical wave can
C. Yi et al. / Computers and Geotechnics 55 (2014) 165–171 171
yield high DSCF in the rock at h = p when the frequency of the inci- [9] Lu JF, Jeng DS, Nie WD. Dynamic response of a pile embedded in a porous
medium subjected to plane SH waves. Comput Geotech 2006;33(8):404–18.
dent wave is low. In cases in which the distance between the line
[10] Kattis S, Beskos D, Cheng A. 2D dynamic response of unlined and lined tunnels
source and the tunnel, depending on the frequency of the incident in poroelastic soil to harmonic body waves. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam
wave, is considered as large, the cylindrical wave can be treated as 2003;32(1):97–110.
a plane wave. Limiting cases were considered and good agreement [11] Lu J, Wang J. The scattering of elastic waves by holes of arbitrary shapes in
saturated soil. Acta Mech Sinica – Chin Ed 2002;34(6):904–13.
with the solutions available in the literature was obtained. [12] Wang J-H, Lu J-F, Zhou X-L. Complex variable function method for the
scattering of plane waves by an arbitrary hole in a porous medium. Eur J Mech
Acknowledgments – A/Solids 2009;28(3):582–90.
[13] Esmaeili M, Vahdani S, Noorzad A. Dynamic response of lined circular tunnel
to plane harmonic waves. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2006;21(5):511–9.
The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable [14] Hasheminejad SM, Kazemirad S. Dynamic response of an eccentrically lined
comments in improving this study. Thanks to Ali Beyglou for lan- circular tunnel in poroelastic soil under seismic excitation. Soil Dynam
Earthquake Eng 2008;28(4):277–92.
guage correction. [15] Lin CH, Lee VW, Todorovska MI, Trifunac MD. Zero-stress, cylindrical wave
functions around a circular underground tunnel in a flat, elastic half-space:
incident P-waves. Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 2010;30(10):879–94.
Appendix A
[16] Uenishi K. Elastodynamic analysis of underground structural failures induced
by seismic body waves. J Appl Mech 2012;79(3).
[17] Jones J, Whittier J. Waves at a flexibly bonded interface. J Appl Mech
eð1Þ 2 2 2
11 ðarÞ ¼ ðn þ n 1=2b r ÞJ n ðarÞ arJ n1 ðarÞ 1967;34(3):905–9.
eð3Þ
11 ðarÞ ¼ ðn2
þ n 1=2b r ÞHð1Þ
2 2 ð1Þ
n ðarÞ arHn1 ðarÞ [18] Murty GS. A theoretical model for the attenuation and dispersion of Stoneley
eð4Þ a 2 2 2 ð2Þ
a a ð2Þ waves at the loosely bonded interface of elastic half spaces. Phys Earth Planet
11 ð rÞ ¼ ðn þ n 1=2b r ÞH n ð rÞ rH n1 ðarÞ
h i Interiors 1975;11(1):65–79.
eð3Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ
12 ðbrÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞHn ðbrÞ þ brHn1 ðbrÞ [19] Newmark NM, Siess CP. Viest I. Tests and analysis of composite beams with
h i incomplete interaction. Proc Soc Exp Stress Anal 1951;9(1):75–92.
eð4Þ ð2Þ ð2Þ
12 ðbrÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞHn ðbrÞ þ brHn1 ðbrÞ [20] Paskaramoorthy R, Datta S, Shah A. Effect of interface layers on scattering of
eð1Þ 2 2 2 2 2 elastic waves. J Appl Mech 1988;55:871–8.
21 ðarÞ ¼ ðn þ n þ 1=2b r a r ÞJ n ðarÞ þ arJ n1 ðarÞ
ð3Þ ð1Þ [21] Rokhlin S, Wang Y. Analysis of boundary conditions for elastic wave
e21 ðarÞ ¼ ðn þ n þ 1=2b r a2 r2 ÞHð1Þ
2 2 2
n ðarÞ þ arHn1 ðarÞ interaction with an interface between two solids. J Acoust Soc Am
eð4Þ
21 ðarÞ ¼ ðn2
þ n þ 1=2b2 2
r a2 2
r ÞH ð2Þ
n ð arÞ þ arH
ð2Þ
n1 ðarÞ 1991;89(2):503–15.
h i
[22] Martin P. Boundary integral equations for the scattering of elastic waves by
eð3Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ
22 ðbrÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞH n ðbrÞ brHn1 ðbrÞ
h i elastic inclusions with thin interface layers. J Nondestruct Eval 1992;11(3–
eð4Þ ð2Þ ð2Þ 4):167–74.
22 ðbrÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞH n ðbrÞ brHn1 ðbrÞ
[23] Huang W, Rokhlin S, Wang Y. Analysis of different boundary condition models
eð1Þ
41 ðarÞ ¼ n½ðn þ 1ÞJ n ðarÞ þ arJ n1 ðarÞ for study of wave scattering from fiber–matrix interphases. J Acoust Soc Am
h i
eð3Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ 1997;101(4):2031–42.
41 ðarÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞH n ðarÞ þ arHn1 ðarÞ
h i [24] Wang Y, Yu G, Zhang Z, Feng Y. Review on elastic wave propagation under
eð4Þ ð2Þ ð2Þ
41 ðarÞ ¼ n ðn þ 1ÞH n ðarÞ þ arHn1 ðarÞ
complex interface (interface layer) conditions. J Adv Mech 2000;30(3):378–90.
[25] Achenbach J, Zhu H. Effect of interfacial zone on mechanical behavior and
eð3Þ 2 2 2 ð1Þ
42 ðbrÞ ¼ ðn þ n 1=2b r ÞH n ðbrÞ þ brHn1 ðbrÞ
ð1Þ
failure of fiber-reinforced composites. J Mech Phys Solids 1989;37(3):381–93.
eð4Þ
42 ðbrÞ ¼ ðn 2
þ n 1=2b 2 2
r ÞH ð2Þ
n ðbrÞ þ brH
ð2Þ
n1 ðbrÞ
[26] Shen H, Schiavone P, Ru C, Mioduchowski A. Stress analysis of an elliptic
inclusion with imperfect interface in plane elasticity. J Elasticity Phys Sci Solids
eð3Þ
71 ðarÞ ¼ arH
ð1Þ
n1 ða rÞ nH ð1Þ
n ð arÞ e ð1Þ
71 ðarÞ ¼ a ð1Þ
rJ n1 ðarÞ nJð1Þ
ð3Þ ð1Þ
n ðarÞ e72 ðbrÞ ¼ nHn ðbrÞ
ð4Þ ð3Þ ð1Þ ð4Þ
2001;62(1):25–46.
ð2Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ ð2Þ
e72 ðbrÞ ¼ nHn ðbrÞ e81 ðarÞ ¼ nHn ðarÞ e81 ðarÞ ¼ nJn ðarÞ e81 ðarÞ ¼ nHn ðarÞ [27] Sudak L, Ru C, Schiavone P, Mioduchowski A. A circular inclusion with
h i h i
eð3Þ ð1Þ ð1Þ
eð4Þ ð2Þ ð2Þ inhomogeneously imperfect interface in plane elasticity. J Elasticity
82 ðbrÞ ¼ brHn1 ðbrÞ nHn ðbrÞ 82 ðbrÞ ¼ brHn1 ðbrÞ nHn ðbrÞ :
1999;55(1):19–41.
[28] Valier-Brasier T, Dehoux T, Audoin B. Scaled behavior of interface waves at an
imperfect solid–solid interface. J Appl Phys 2012;112(2). 024904–12.
References [29] Honarvar F, Sinclair A. Nondestructive evaluation of cylindrical components by
resonance acoustic spectroscopy. Ultrasonics 1998;36(8):845–54.
[1] Goto Y, Kikuchi A, Nishioka T. Dynamic behavior of tunnel lining due to [30] Huber R, Mignogna R, Simmonds K, Schechter R, Delsanto P. Dynamic full-field
adjacent blasting. In: 6th ISRM congress; 1987. visualization of ultrasound interacting with material defects: experiment and
[2] Liang Q, Li J, Li D, Ou E. Effect of blast-induced vibration from new railway simulation. Ultrasonics 1997;35(1):7–16.
tunnel on existing adjacent railway tunnel in Xinjiang, China. Rock Mech Rock [31] Delsanto PP, Scalerandi M. A spring model for the simulation of the
Eng 2013;46(1):19–39. propagation of ultrasonic pulses through imperfect contact interfaces. J
[3] Shin J-H, Moon H-G, Chae S-E. Effect of blast-induced vibration on existing Acoust Soc Am 1998;104(2584).
tunnels in soft rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2011;26(1):51–61. [32] Lombard B, Piraux J. Numerical modeling of elastic waves across imperfect
[4] Pao Y-H, Mow C-C. Diffraction of elastic waves and dynamic stress contacts. SIAM J Sci Comput 2006;28(1):172–205.
concentrations. New York: Crane, Russak & Co. Inc.; 1973. [33] Rajabi M, Hasheminejad SM. Acoustic resonance scattering from a
[5] Datta SK, Wong KC, Shah AH. Dynamic stresses and displacements around multilayered cylindrical shell with imperfect bonding. Ultrasonics
cylindrical cavities of arbitrary shape. J Appl Mech 1984;51(4):798–803. 2009;49(8):682–95.
[6] Lee V, Karl J. Diffraction of SV waves by underground, circular, cylindrical [34] Wang X, Sudak L. Scattering of elastic waves by multiple elastic circular
cavities. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 1992;11(8):445–56. cylinders with imperfect interface. Waves Random Complex Media
[7] Moore ID, Guan F. Three-dimensional dynamic response of lined tunnels due to 2007;17(2):159–87.
incident seismic waves. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 1996;25(4):357–69.
[8] Davis C, Lee V, Bardet J. Transverse response of underground cavities and pipes
to incident SV waves. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 2001;30(3):383–410.