Ranolia Hydro (17 MW)

SHYDO
SARHAD HYDEL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION

Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 4rk-a=seg-4
No. 1452/SHYDO/Ranolia
Dated Peshawar, the 20.2.2013
To
The Registrar,
National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA),
2nd Floor, OPF Building,
G-5/2, Islamabad.
Subject: 17 MW Ranolia Hydropower Project, District Kohistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-

Application for Generation License.
Dear Sir,
1. I, Wajid Nawaz Khan, Project Manager Ranolia Hydropower project of

Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO) being the duly Authorised
representative of SHYDO by virtue of authority letter dated 20th February 2013 hereby
apply to National Electric Power Regulatory Authority for the grant of a Generation
Licence to SHYDO for 17 MW Ranolia Hydropower Project, pursuant to the Regulation
of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997.
2. I, certify that the documents-in-support attached with this application are

prepared and submitted in conformity with the provisions of the National Electric Power
Regulatory Authority Licensing (Application and Modification Procedure) Regulations,
1999 and undertake to abide by the terms and provisions of the above-said regulations.
I further undertake and confirm that the information provided in the attached
documents-in-support is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
3. A BANK DRAFT in the sum of Rupees n'27- if being the non-refundable

licence application fee calculated in accordance with Schedule II to the National Electric
Power Regulatory Authority Licensing (Application and Modification Procedure)
Regulations, 1999, is also attached.
Regards.
P"'-'0— •
, -
1. • Yours truly,
v
(ENGR.I. WAJID N WAZ KHAN)

'Project Manager
Ranolia Hydropower Project
Y1 (... Lt.t..)
SHYDO House Plot No 38-B, Phase-V Hayatabad Peshawar. Phone 091-9217463

•
SHYDO
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa fttagrzeso
No. /4 si /SHYDO/Ranolia HPP/Tariff
Dated Peshawar, the 0.2.2013
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Mr. Wajid Nawaz Khan S/o, Mohammad Nawaz Khan Bearing CNIC No 17301-
1333544-5 is hereby appointed as authorized representative of Sarhad Hydel
Development Organization (SHYDO), for the purpose of filing an application for
determination of tariff for Ranolia Hydropower Project and to submit before NEPRA, an
application for grant of Generation License for the said project. He is also authorized to
attend any meeting(s) and discussions related to the determination of tariff and grant of
generation license and to provide any information & documents needed in this regard.
For and on behalf of

Sarhad Hydel Development Organization
(ENGR. BAHADUR SHAH)

Managing Director
38-B2, Phase-V, Hayatabad, Peshawar Tel' 091-9271329, Fax' 091-9211988

CURRENT A/C No. BRANCH CODE CD-50 CHEQUE No
AAlliedBank 0010006677779339 0854 22 16488365
ABL TOWER, HAYATABA
PESHAWAR Payee's Account Only
Dateg'"173-9e(5
R BEARER
E• PAY
• RUPEES
ca
92 IRA__
:7 att,44441;:tj,
PROJECT MANAGER RANOLIA HPP
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
us 16 408541:00 &0006677770339000010 RANOLIA
_
a
Li 1
-4
Check List for Examination of
New Generation Facility (Hydel) - Licence Application
Name of Company: Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO)

Capacity: 17 MW
Prepared/Updated on: 13.2.2013
Information/Documents Compliance
Regulation 14 Required Remarks
Yes No.
Authorization from Board Resolution /

3(1) Yes Attached
Power of Attorney
3(3) Application fee (including Indexation) Yes Attached
3(4) Three copies of Application Yes Attached
SHYDO is a public sector
constituted under SHYDO Act
3(5)(a)(i) Certificate of incorporation Yes 1993 and is exempt under
Section 24 of NEPRA Act and
thus not required
SHY DO is a public sector
3(5)(a)(ii) Memorandum and articles of association Yes 1993 and is exempt under
Section 24 of NEPRA Act and
thus not required
SHY DO is a public sector
Annual Return statements or in lieu
3(5)(a)(iii) No 1993 and therefore, not
thereof
required to submit Annual
Return statement.
Profile of experience of the applicant its
3(5)(b) management,
47, staff and its members in Yes Brief on SHYDO is enclosed.
power sector.
CVs of applicant's Senior Management
3(5)(c) Yes Attached
and Technical professionals
SHY DO is a public sector,
3(5)(d)(i) Cash balance & bank certificates Yes ADP funded oruanization
:7 and
therefore, it is not required.
Expression of interest to provide credit
3(5)(d)(ii) or financing along with sources and Yes Loan Agreement enclosed.
details thereof
SHYDO is a public sector,
3(5)( d)( iii) Latest financial statements Yes ADP funded ort,anization
47 and
therefore, it is not required.
Employment records of Engineers &
3(5)(d)(iv) Yes CVs are attached.
Technical Staff
3(5)(d)(v) Profile of Sub-contractors Yes Profile is attached.
EPC awarded under FIDIC
Verified references w.r.t. experience of
3(5)(d)(vi) Yes rules after ICB and complete
the Applicant and its sub-Contractors
verification of contractors.
3(5)(e) Encumbrances on assets Yes ADB loan through EAD, GOP
Technical and financial proposal for EPC executed and work in
3(5)(f) Operation, maintenance, planning and Yes progress under the EPC siuned
development of the generation facility. 1 with consortium of
DESCON/Tried China.
3(5)(0( a) Type of Technology Details provided in project
Hydel
details
3(5)(h) Feasibility Report
Yes Provided
3(5)(i) Prospectus Attached
Yes
C'one'd . P2
-: 2 :-
Schedule II
Location (location maps, site maps) District Details provided in
I.
land Kohistan project details
Run of To be located on
2. Plant: run of river, storage, weir
River Ranolia Khwar
Maximum Net Head-
408.87
3. Head: Minimum, maximum
Minimum Net Head-
401.00
4 Technology: Francis, Pelton, etc. Size,

number of units. Pelton , 2x8.5 MW
). Tunnel (if proposed): length, diameter No
ESSA (Environmental and Social Approval Letter

6
Soundness Assessment) attached
7. Detailed feasibility report Yes Copy provided
8. Resettlement issues No Settled
EIA and land
acquisition already
approved. Customs
and other duties at

9. Consents
concessionary rates
will be applicable as
per GOP/GoKPK
Policy.
Included in EPC.
10. Infrastructure development Construction of access
road (Copy provided).
Please provide power
Interconnection with National Grid purchaser letter of

11. Co. distance and name of nearest grid, Yes
consent for power off
voltage level (single line diagram)
take.
Project cost, information regarding

12. sources and amounts of equity and
debt.
Const period : 32
13. Project schedule, expected life months, extended to
44 months. Project life
\>'
50 years.
14. Peaking/base load operation Base load
Gen. Voltage : 11 KV
P.f : 0.8
Frequency: 50 HZ,
Plant characteristics: generation
voltage, power factor, frequency, interconnection at 132
15. automatic generation control,
KV with PESCO.
ramping rate, control metering and
instrumentation Dubai Khwar,Khan
Khwar transmission
line.
Load flow and

16. System studies load flow, short circuit, Interconnection study
stability
attached.
17. Details provided in the

Training and development
contract.
Generation Licence
,dropower Project
Ranolia Fl■
District Kohistan
Article - 1
Definitions
(1) In this Licence:
a. -Act- means the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of

Electric Power Act, 1997 (XL of 1997);
b. "Authority" means the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority
constituted under Section 3 of the Act.
c. "Licensee- means Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO)
d. "Rules" mean the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority Licensing
(Generation) Rules, 2000.
(2) Words and expressions used but not defined herein bear the meaning given thereto
in the Act or in the Rules.
Article - 2
Application of Rules
This Licence is issued subject to the provisions of the Rules, as amended from time to
time.
Article - 3
Generation Facilities
(1) The location, size, technology, interconnection arrangements technical limits.

technical functional specifications and other details specific to the generation
facilities of the licensee are set out in Schedule - Ito this Licence.
(2) The net capacity of the generation facilities is set out in Schedule - II hereto.
(3) The Licensee shall provide the final arrangement, technical and financial
specifications and other details specific to generation facilities before
commissioning of the generation facilities.
Generation Licence
District Kohistan
Article — 4
Term
(1) The Licence is granted for a term of fifty (50) years after the commercial
operation date.
(2) Unless revoked earlier, the licensee may, ninety (90) days prior to the expiry of
the term of the licence, apply for renewal of the Licence under the Licensing
(Application and Modification Procedure) Regulation, 1999.
Article — 5
Licence Fee
The Licensee shall pay to the Authority the Licence fee in the amount and manner and at
the time specified in the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Fee) Rules, 2002.
Article — 6
Tariff
The Licensee shall charge from its consumers only such tariff which has been approved
by the Authority.
Article — 7
Competitive Trading Arrangement
(1) The Licensee shall participate in such measures as may be directed by the
Authority from time to time for development of the Competitive Trading
Arrangement. The Licensee shall in good faith work towards implementation and
operation of the aforesaid Competitive Trading Arrangement in the manner and
time period specified by the Authority:
Provided that, any such participation shall be subject to any contract entered into
between the Licensee and another party with the approval of the Authority.
(2) Any variation and modification in the above mentioned contracts for allowing the
parties thereto to participate wholly or partially in the Competitive Trading
Arrangement shall be subject to mutual agreement of the parties thereto and such
terms and conditions as may be approved by the Authority.
Generation Licence
District Kohistan
Article — 8
Maintenance of Records
For the purpose of sub-rule (1) of Rule 19 of the Rules, copies of records and data
shall be retained in standard and electronic form and all such records and data shall,
subject to just claims of confidentiality, be accessible by the authorized officials of the
Authority.
Article — 9
Compliance with Performance Standards
The Licensee shall conform to the relevant NEPRA rules on Performance Standards
as may be prescribed by the Authority from time to time.
Article — 10
Compliance with Environmental Standards
The Licensee shall conform to the environmental standards as may be prescribed by

the relevant competent authority from time to time.
Article — 11
Provision of information
( I ) The obligation of the licensee to provide information to the Authority shall be

in accordance with Section 44 of the Act.
(2) The licensee shall be subject to such penalties as may be specified in the
relevant rules made by the Authority for failure to furnish such information as
may be required from time to time by the Authority and which is or ought to
be or have been in the control or possession of the licensee.
Generation Licence
Sarhad H)del De∎ elopment Organization
Ranolia H)dropmker Project
District Kohistan
Schedule —1
It contains the following information / drawings / sketches relating to the Power Plant
Equipment and related System which are attached here with:
Plant Details
• General Information
• Plant Configuration
• Fuel Details
• Emission Values
• Installed Capacity
• Derated Capacity
• Expected Life
• Operation Record
• Cooling System
• Plant Characteristics
• Other details specific to the generation facility of the licensee such as:
o Technical Limits of the Plant
o Site Plan of Ranolia Power Plant
o General Layout of entire Ranolia Power Plant
o Interconnection Arrangements with National Grid
Generation Licence
Sarhad I lydel Development Organization
District Kohistan
Plant Details
I. General Information
Sarhad Hydel Development

• Name of Applicant
Organization (SHYDO)
SHYDO House,38-B,Phase-
• Address of the registered office
5,Hayatabad,Peshawar
District Kohistan
• Plant Location
High Head Hydropower Project
• Type of Facility
2. Plant Configuration
• Low Head Hydropower turbines

Capacity of the Power Plant (Net Power Output) 16.49 MW
•
High head hydropower
• Type of Technology
generation
• Number of Units / Capacity --- :
High head Pelton Turbines
• Power Plant Make and Model
June 2014
• Commissioning Date
3. Fuel Details
Hydropower Generation
• Type of Fuel
Indigenous
• Fuel (Imported / Indigenous)
N.A
• Fuel Supplier
With Irrigation
• Water Use Agreement
Department GoKPK
4. Emission values
NA
• SOx
NA
• NO.
NA
• CO
NA
• PM10
16.49 MW
• Installed Capacity
16.49 MW
5. Derated Capacity
50 years
6. Expected Life of the Facility
Generation Licence
District Kohistan
7. Operation Record New Plant to be

commissioned by June 2014
7. Plant Characteristics
• Generating Voltage I 1 KV
• Frequency 50 Hz
• Power Factor Leading 0.95 & Lagging 0.8
• Automatic Generation Control No
• Ramping Time 10 Minutes
• Alternative Fuel No
• Auxiliary Consumption 510 Kw
• Time required to Synchronise 1 Minute
Generation Licence
Sarhad 1 lydel De \ elopment Organization
District Kohistan
SCHEDULE — 11
The Net Capacity of the Licensee's Generation Facility
17 MW
• Gross Installed Capacity of the Plant (ISO)
16.49
• Derated Capacity of the Plant
510 kW
• Auxiliary Consumption of the Plant
16490 kW
• Net Capacity of the Plant
44 months
• Construction Period
Expected date of Commercial Operation of the Plant — July I, 2014
•
Note: These are indicative figures provided by the Licensee.
The Net Capacity of the Plant available for dispatch to Power Purchaser will be determined
through procedures contained in the EPC Agreements or Grid Code
Generation Licence
Ranolia Hydropo∎■,er Project
District Kohistan
Interconnection Arrangement with National Grid for Power Dispersal of the

Plant
The interconnection scheme for the Power dispersal from Ranolia Power Plant would
be decided by Power Purchaser and would be made part of the Power Purchase
Agreement.
SI-1-1(1:0 0
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
Development Activities in
Hydro Power Sector of
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
November 2012
I
CONTENTS
1. Introduction 1
i. Objectives of the Organization 1
ii. Role of SHYDO 1
iii. SHYDO Organization 2
2. Achievements by SHYDO 2
i. Small Hydel Potential Sites 3
ii. Medium / Large Hydropower Systems 3
iii. Feasibility Studies completed 4
iv. Hydropower Projects completed 4
v. Hydropower Projects under Construction 4
vi. Hydropower Projects ready for Construction 5
vii. Construction Projects under ACTION PLAN 5
viii. Pre-Feasibility studies conducted for Private Sector 6
c.*
1. Introduction
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province of Pakistan is blessed with huge hydropower
potential. This Potential remained focus of interest to private investors and international
funding agencies. Most of the hydel projects of Pakistan including Tarbela and Warsak
hydropower stations are located in KP.
Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO), since its inception in 1986, has
been instrumental in identifying and exploiting hydel potential in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The
organization is under the administrative control of Irrigation and Power Department of
Provincial Government and is governed by the Board of Directors. SHYDO has so far
identified a number of promising hydel potential sites of more than 6000 MW capacity,
which can be developed in a systematic manner either through Public sector or Private sector.
i. Objectives of the Organization
• Prepare comprehensive plan for development of the power and energy resources
of the province.
• Frame schemes related to Generation, Transmission and Distribution of power,

construction, maintenance and operation of powerhouses.
• Advisory body for the Government of KP in power sector matters regarding
hydropower development.
• Conducting feasibility studies, surveys of hydel potential sites etc.
• Implementation of Provincial Hydel Power Policy to promote private sector

investment in generation, transmission and distribution of power.
ii. Role of SHYDO
The Provincial Government has entrusted a dynamic role to SHYDO, which mainly
oriented towards private sponsors participation in power sector projects besides
developing projects in public sector. SHYDO has established a dedicated Directorate
to provide one window facility to private sponsors.
1
iii. SHYDO Organization
An eight member Board of Directors under the chairmanship of the Chief Minister of
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governs affairs of SHYDO. The members include Minister
Irrigation & Power, Minister Finance, Additional Chief Secretary, Secretary Irrigation
& Power, Secretary Finance, Secretary Law and Managing Director SHYDO. The
head office of the Organization is at Peshawar.
Organogram of SHY00
r
ChrEi= MINISTER
Chatrman SHY DO Board f
Members
of the
SHYDO Board
Adddion.111 turf '>etirtaty MD %Hai , ::;,1,1.0:,toaN f

NeLtriaiv & Posomt 1111eitiben iMemit 1 -SI
161 411,•1 I h P owPi
00■
IMPoilt•ti iMemben
Ve. J
1_
Planning Finance & Admn
& Facilitation
--------- --
Director Director O&C
Policy Formulation
& Marketing Regulation
Director Director
AD (Admn) Aic Officer
Dy Dir
Dy. Dir
Dy. Dir Dy. Dir Dy Dir
Civil Electrical Hydrology
AD ADs
ADs ADs AD(Hydrology) AD (Geology)
2. Achievements by SHYDO
SHYDO, with the assistance of GTZ (German Agency for Technical Cooperation),
has compiled a Master Plan for rural electrification in the Northern mountainous areas of KP
with particular emphasis on those areas which were not connected to the National Grid
System. The Master Plan entails a total potential of more than 6000 MW that has been
identified for public and private sector development. The hydropower potential sites are
mainly located in the Northern districts of KP i.e. Chitral, Dir, Swat, Indus Kohistan and
Mansehra.
2
i. Small Hydel Potential Sites
The Master Plan envisages small scale potential sites having total capacity of
about 240 MW, comprising 53 hydel potential sites. These sites are suitable for
regional supply to isolated communities in the mountainous areas of KP. The district
wise breakup of sites is as follows:
Power Potential
Sr. No. Region Nos. of Sites
(MW)
1 Upper Chitral 12 80
2 Lower Chitral 10 68
3 Kohistan 4 6
4 Swat 5 5
5 Mansehra West 2 19
6 Kaghan Valley 3 13
7 Dir 17 50
TOTAL: 53 241
ii. Medium/Large Hydropower Systems
During field investigations, some very attractive sites of medium and large
hydropower potential were also identified by SHYDO.
Sr. Capacity Remarks

Name of Project / Location (MW)
No.
Private sector is developing
1. Kandiah System, Kohistan 1002 these sites under Federal
a. Karang Scheme, 454 MW Power Policy
b. Kaigah Scheme, 548 MW
2. Swat System, Swat 659

a. Upper Scheme Al, 101 MW -do-
b. Middle Scheme B1, 410 MW
c. Lower Scheme Cl, 148 MW
3. Spat Gah, Kohistan 1250 WAPDA has undertaken the
a. Upper Scheme 200 MW feasibility study through
b. Middle Scheme 550 MW KfW, Germany
c. Lower Scheme 500 MW
4. Chor Nala Ssyetm, Kohistan 1500

a. Scheme C-II, 700 MW -do-
b. Scheme C-I, 650 MW
c. Scheme K-II, 150 MW
5. Kunhar River System, Mansehra 865 Private sector is developing
a. Naran, 215 MW these sites under Federal
b. Suki Kinar, 840 MW Power Policy
3
iii. Feasibility Studies Completed
Out of the identified sites, SHYDO has completed feasibility studies of the
following potential sites. These schemes are in various stages of implementation.
Sr. Capacity
Project / Location Remarks
No. (MW)
1. Daral Khwar HPP, Swat 36 Under implementation
through ADB Loan
2. Ranolia HPP, Kohistan 11 -do-
3. Pehur HPP, Swabi 18 Under construction by
SHYDO
4. Summar Gah HPP, Kohistan 28 Suitable for private sector
5. Batal Khwar HPP, Swat 8 Suitable for private sector
6. Matiltan HPP, Swat 84 Under implementation by
private sponsor
7. Khan Khwar HPP, Besham 72
Picked up by WAPDA for
8. Duber Khwar HPP, Kohistan 130
implementation
9. Allai Khwar HPP, Batagram 120
3. Hydropower Projects Completed
SHYDO, after successful completion of following four small and medium size hydel
projects with its own resources is planning to launch number of small, medium and
large hydropower projects in view urgency for combating energy crises in the
country.
Projects Completed by SHYDO
Sr. Name of Scheme Location Capacity in
No. MW
i Malakand-III HPP Malakand 81
ii Pehur HPP Swabi 18
iii Shishi HPP Chitral 1.8
iv Reshun HPP Chitral 4.2
Total Installed Capacity 105
These projects are not only contributing towards the reduction in load shedding but
also generating annual revenue of Rs. 2 to 3 billion for the province.
4
Besides the above completed Hydropower Projects, SHYDO is implementing
following projects with the assistance of Asian Development Bank (ADB) for the
development of Hydropower Potential in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province which will
be completed within three years;
Projects under construction:
Sr.No Name of Scheme Location Capacity in MW

i Daral Khwar HPP Swat 36.6
ii Ranolia HPP Kohistan 17.0
iii Machai HPP Mardan 2.60
Total Capacity 56.20
Under the same loan, SHYDO is conducting feasibility studies of additional/

following three projects with the total capacity of 48 MW. Construction works on
these projects will start during the financial year 2012-13 and will be completed in the
next five years.
Projects ready for construction
i Koto HPP Dir Lower 31

ii Karora New HPP Shangla 10
iii Jabori HPP Mansehra 7
Total Capacity 48
The Honorable Chief Minister has issued special directives for the implemntation of
hydel projects to address the acute energy crises in the country. In this regard,
SHYDO prepared an ACTION PLAN which has been approved by the Prvincial
Goverment of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, under which SHYDO will construct the
following eight(8) Hydel Projects having a installed capacity of 593 MW.
Construction Projects
Sr. Capacity in
Name of Scheme Location
No MW
1 Matiltan HPP Swat 84
2 Sharmai HPP Dir 115
3 Koto HPP Dir 31
4 Karora HPP Shangla 10
5 Jabori HPP Mansehra 8
6 Shushai-Zhendoli HPP Chitral 144
5
Sr. Capacity in
Name of Scheme Location
No MW
7 Shogo Sin HPP Chitral 132
8 Lawi HPP Chitral 69
Total Capacity 593
In addition to construction projects SHYDO has also started feasibility study of the
following 13 Hydel Power Projects with potential of 1322 MW under the same
ACTION PLAN. The PC-IIs for feasibility studies of thirteen projects has been
approved by PDWP, the selection of consultant is in process and the feasibility study
will be completed during the next two to three years. The construction of these
projects will be achieved during the period 2011-2021.
Projects under Feasibility Studies

1 Gahrit-Swir Lasht HPP Chitral 334
2 Korag Parait HPP Chitral 223
3 Laspur Marigram HPP Chitral 133
4 Arkari Gol HPP Chitral 24
5 Istaru-Buni HPP Chitral 52
6 Mujigram Shogo HPP Chitral 51
7 Barikot Patrak HPP Dir 34
8 Patrak Shringal HPP Dir 21
9 Shigo Kach HPP Dir 26
10 Ghor Band HPP Shangla 14
11 Nandihar HPP Batagram 10
12 Naram Dam HPP Mansehra 210
13 Balakot HPP Mansehra 190
Total Installed Capacity 1322
In order to facilitate the private sector, SHYDO has also conduting Pre-Feasibility
study of 10 raw sites in various districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province and these
sites have been offered to private sector for develoment.
***
6
CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME ENCR. BAHADUR SHAH
POSITION MANAGING DIRECTOR
PERMANENT House No. 181, Sector N-2, Phase-4

ADDRESS I la ■ ar. Pakistan
atahad. Pesha∎■
Phone : Res: 091-817451. 0333-9109377
E -Mail : bshah786hotmail.com
PRESENT ADDRESS: Director (Planning & Facilitation)

Sarhad 11■: del Development Organization (SI IY DO)
372 WAPDA House. Shami Road. Pesha\kar. Pakistan
Phone. 091-9212026
E-Mail : bshah786, ii hotmail.com
DATE OF BIRTH 01 March. 1961
NATIONALITY Pakistani
DOMECILE N.W F P
ACADEMIC
QUALIFICATION B Sc CIVIL ENGINEERING ( WI I II HONORS) 1981-1985
HIGHER ACADEMIC M.Sc Construction/Project Management

QUALIFICATION : From University of Birmingham, U.K. (1991-92)
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
I have about 20 years of professional experience in the follim ing positions starting from present to
past:
MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHYDO, PESHAWAR

(April 2011 till date)
DIRECTOR (PLANNING & FACILITATION), SIIYDO, PESHAWAR

(Aug 2000 to April 20111
As Director (Planning & Facilitation). I am responsible rot- the Collo \\ mg duties.
in N WIT under Annual Development Program

To plan and construct hydropower schemes
in light of Government policies. Chief' Minkter directive, and Funds a\ failabilit\
To devise strategy for implementation of projects;

Project Managers on various h ∎ del project,.
To guide the project teams lead 1-) ■
To carry out Pre and post-qualification of consultants/ contractors and their final selection.
To assist the Project teams in preparation of Cost Estimates/ BOQ/ PC-II/ PC-I.
To coordinate with donors including ADB. World Rank. Krw. .11CA etc for appraisal of the
project. hi lateral meetings and negotiations;
Preparation of Bid/ Contract Documents;
To chair technical evaluation committees constituted tbr various hvdel projects.
To ensure quality control using standard specifications and design:
Preparation of annual budget;
To facilitate prix ate sector in by del development under I ederal Polio. 2002 and Provincial
Pm\ er
To negotiate Power Purchase Agreement;
To attend important meetings regarding SI IYDO projects \\ ith PPIB, NEPRA and Federal
ministries;
To prepare proposal Ibr Restructuring of the Organization in light of Vvorld Rank Report:
To prepare agenda and various Working Papers tbr SHYDO Board Meetings;
To assist MD SHYDO iii da■

to day \\ orks.
PROJECT DIRECTOR, ALLA! KHWAR FIPP, CHOR NALLAH & SPAT GAH, SHYDO
j1997 to Aug 20001:
As PROJECT DIRECTOR of 163 MW Allai Klmar I IPP. I \\ as responsible for the follo\\ ing
duties:
I o plan project activities and prepare its PC-11. time schedules. prepare REPS/ Scope of
Work. short list consultants, contractors and conclude Consultancy Contracts;
To coordinate \\ ith German Government/ Krw for funding:. attending hi-lateral talks and
finalizing various agreements;
To carry out reasibilit\ Stud\ of 163 MW Allai Khwar, 1500 MW Chor Nallah and 1250
MW Spatgah Hydropower Projects.
To organize Panel of Experts (Pot-.) and Steering Committee Meetings:
To attend meetings \\ ith KtW. World Bank, ADB and other investors for Project Financing
To supervise the work of international consultants and contractors.
As Project Director. assisted MD SI IYDO in planning various activities of Malakand-111 IIPP
ROJECT MANAGER, MATILTAN HYDROPOWER PROJECT, SHYDO

11994 to 19971
As Project Manager of the 84 MW Matiltan Protect. consisting of various civil. planning. geo-
technical. electro-mechanical components. I performed the follo\\ ing NA oil., and functions'
Representing client in the position of Project Manager. I was responsible for management of
Feasibility Studs undertaken by international consultants "Sir William I laICRM & Partners":
To prepare cost estimates using standard schedule of rates.
To organize project teams and assiun duties
I was responsible for preparing progress reports using MS Project and Excel.
Responsible for timely completion. quality control, budgeting. financial as well as personnel
management of the project.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PLANNING), SHYDO

11992 to 19941
In the position of Executive I lni_u neer in the Planning. Design and Construction Directorate. I
performed various functions including.
To prepare PC-IIs/ PC-Is of the projects.
ii. To shortiist consultants and contractors:
iii. To implement projects as per scope of \york y en under PC-Ils, PC-I:
iv To prepare quarterly and annual revie\v reports for ineetin2, in P&D department.
v. To conduct Sur eY s and Geotechnical investigations of dropo\\ er projects.
Fo carry out Feasibility Studies of I 1.■

dropo\Yer projects:
vii. lo coordinate \\all WA PDA for power planning:
viii. Master Plan studies regarding hydropower potential in NWIT
SDO CONSTRUCTION SUB DIVISION, SHYDO

pun, 1987 to Aug, 19911
As SDO. I was responsible to plan. design. develop cost estimates. tender documents and
to supervise the construction of several Projects includinu Asburan and Nall Projects. I
supervised Civil Engineering works \\ hich included canal. residential building. access road.
water supply. power house. and other reintqrced structures including hridues, culverts. and
drainage structures. I \\ as also responsible for quality control. timely completion and
financial manauement of the project.
JUNIOR NEGINEER W&A DIVISION, NF.SPAK, LAHORE

J19 APRIL 1986 to JUNE 19871
As Junior Engineer. I assisted the Chief and other senior engineers on various projects
including Command Water Management Project and Kalabauh Darn Project.
TRAINING
Long Training (Project Management)
3
It was tbreign training of one year in UK in the field of Project Management. British
Government sponsored this training. Training included various aspects of project

management. computer soft wares. contract procedures and Qualit∎ Control:
Short Training Courses
These were several Coreign as well as local training/ workshops/ seminars. including the tbllov\
• Computer Applications in Project Management
• Foreign training in hydropower planning and development in Austria K. Germany
• Monitoring & Evaluation
• ISO 9000
• Project Management
• World Bank Guidelines
COMPUTER TRAINING AND LITERACY
MS Word .MS Power Point. E \cel

AutoCAD
MS Project. Primavera Basics
E-MaiE Internet. Web Page Design
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Pakistan Engineering Council

No. Civil/8737 as Professional Engineer
Institute of Civil Engineers
Grade 8.: Membership No (5) 490605-63
LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY'
English (Good in speaking. reading and \\ ritinL.1)

J rdu (Good in speaking, reading and \\ ming )
Pushto (Good in speaking. reading and writing)
REFERENCES
1. Mr M. Shehzad Arbab
Secretary Irrigation & Power Department
GoN VVFP
Engr• M Yunu Mar at

Ex Managing Director. SHYDO
3. Engr: Nisar Mohammad Khan

Former Chief' Engineer. SI IYDO
4
CURRICULUM VITAE
Personal
Name FARHAT MAHMOOD
Father's Name S. SABIR SHAH
Date of Birth 14th March 1956
Nationality/ Domicile Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa)
Present Address Room 121PHYDO House, Phase —V

Hyatabad
Peshawar , KP, Pakistan.
Phone: 92-91-9217488
Fax: 92-91-9217489
Mobile : 0333-9171098 (Pakistan)
Email:
Permanent Address
Academic Qualifications
University Level Qualification:
NWFP University of Engineering & Technology,

Peshawar, NWFP, Pakistan
Bachelor Degree in Civil Engg in First Division
Computer Skill:
Computer Aided Design (AUTOCAD)
Microsoft Word (MS WORD)
Microsoft Excel (MS EXCEL)
Microsoft Project (MS PROJECT)
Microsoft Power Point (MS Power Point)
Survey Software (LEICA) etc.
Professional Experience (23 Years)

Period: June 1986 to till date
Employer: PHYDO /Peshawar, KP., Pakistan.
Project Site: Northern Areas (KP)
Designation: Office / Monitoring Engineer (Civil)
Job description:
• Preparation of specifications, bill of quantities, estimates, PC-Is etc.

• Verifying bills of Contractors as per specifications/design/site
• Structural / Hydraulic design of small hydraulic/building structures.
• Preparation of construction schedule.
• Technical Co-ordination with Consultants.
• Preparation/Revision /Monitoring of drawings on CAD.
• Periodic Visits for site supervision etc.
MAIN PROJECTS ARE:
1. Reshun Hydropower Project, Distt. Chitral.

2. Shishi Hydropower Project, Distt. Chitral.
3. Summer Gah Hydropower project, Distt. Kohistan.
4. Daral Khwar hydropower project, Distt. Swat Etc.
5. Duber Khawar Hydropower project,Distt Kohistan
Period: March, 1982 to June, 1986

Employer: ACL(Associated Constructions Ltd)
Pakistan
Project Site: Construction Works in KP
Designation: Project manager
Job description:
• Processing the survey field data on Computer.

• Preparing sections / plans from the field data for monthly statements.
• Extracting / updating quantities according to survey done on site for own record.
• Preparing of sections / drawings as per actual survey for technical office etc.
Professional membership
i) Pakistan Engineering Council.
Languages
i) Pashto(Excellent) ii) Urdu (Excellent) iii) English (Well)
v
7
CURRICULUM VITAE
NAME WAJID NAWAZ KHAN
FATHER NAME MOHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN
PROFESSION Civil Engineer
DATE OF BIRTH 18-09-64
MARITAL STATUS Married
MAILING ADDRESS 365-WAPDA House. Shami Road. Peshawar, NWT, Pakistan.
QUALIFICATION M.Sc Hydropower Development. University or Science &

Fechnology."Irondhcim, Norway.
From : Auo.ust, 1997 To June. 1999.
B.Sc. Civil. NWFP University of Engineering K Technology.

Peshawar.
From : October. I 983 To June. 1988.
TRAIN ING/COLIRSLS Six weeks training in the lield of "Precision Surrey in the tield of
I ly droposs er- . held in Bochum. Germans.
One \seek advance training in the field of Computer Aided Design

(AutoCAD) by Graduate school or management and computer
Sciences.
COMPUTER SKILLS MS-Word

MS-Excels
AutoCAD
LANGUAGE SKILLS Pushto (Excellent)

Urdu (Excellent)
English (Good)
EMPLOYER Power Department. Govt oI N WI - P.
DURA FION August 1999 to date
STATUS Research officer technical
JOB DESCRIPTION Technical input on the I ly del projects submitted to govt lor
approval.
EMPLOYER Sarhad Ilydel Development Organization (SI IYD0), Govt of N-
W.F.P Peshawar
DURATION January, 1990 to August 1997 (8 yrs)
STATUS Assistant Director (Survey )
JOB DESCRIPTION . Responsible for survey works of the follm‘ing hydropower

REFERENCES projects (I IPP). performing surveying tasks like
Triangulation/close traverse, Topographic survey. Leveling.
Computerized processing of field data to generate maps.
Instrument used w ere Topcon Total Station. SDR 33 Data logger.
Level and Theodolite etc.
1.7 km long 'Funnel survey work of Reshun I IPP: Establishment of

Close traverse at Inlet & outlet portals. Intel-linking of traverse at
inlet and outlet by Triangulation. Controlling the direction of
tunnel in horizontal plane and vertical plane. Location for adits.
Preparation of Long and cross section of tunnel.
Topographic surrey or Summereah I IPP: Estahlishment of close

traverse and topographic survey of intake area. power
channel/tunnel. surgehay. penstock and powerhouse area.
Khan Kip.% ar IIPP: Additional topographic surrey Ihr the reservoir

area.
Daral Kh\var HPP: Additional topographic survey in the intake

and penstock area.
EMPLOYER National Engineering Services or Pakistan (NESPAK). Public

health engineering division.
DURATION March 1989 to Januar\ 1990.
STATUS Junior Engineer
JOB DESCRIPTION Data collection. compilation and evaluation of rural water supply
REFERENCES and sanitation system for N V1'1=P.
CURRICULUM VITAE
Name: Bashir Ahmad
Date of birth. 1st April 1954
Domicile- District Chitral
E-Mail Address: bashirchitrali©Yahoo.co.in
Postal Address: H. No. 158, Sector- N2, Street-3, Ph-VI,

Hayatabad Peshawar NWFP, Pakistan
Phone # (Residence) + 92 91 5815546
Mobile. + 92 300 5927337

+ 92 346 9696168
Facsimile: + 92 91 5815546
Key Qualifications:
Professional Electrical Engineer, with overall experience of 26 years in

conceptual development, preparation, management, implementation
(construction), monitoring, and evaluation of small and medium Hydropower
& Diesel Generating Projects, at all stages from identification to operation
and maintenance, including construction of 0.400, 11 & 33 kV Transmission
& Distribution lines
Educational Qualification:
B.Sc. Engineering (Electrical) from University of Engineering & Technology

Peshawar in the year 1982
Courses Attended:
In Country:
(i) Power Generation Training from WAPDA Training Center at

Mangla, Pakistan, from 1983 to 1984
(ii) Specialized, on job training, in Operation & Maintenance of

Hydropower & Diesel Power Stations, in 2000 MW, WAPDA Power
Station at Tarbela, Pakistan, from 1984 to1986
Abroad:
One year on job training, on Installation Commissioning and

Testing of Hydropower Turbines Generators, Transformers and the
allied equipment i.e Control & Protection in the turbine and other
manufacturing factories of Wasserkraft Volk (WKV), Sulzer/Escher
Wayss and Siemens, in Germany, Switzerland, France and
Austria, in the year 1991, arranged by Pak German Technical Co-
operation, (GTZ)
Professional Experience:
(a) Public Sector Organizations:

(WAPDA, IRRIGATION & SHYDO)
1. Junior Engineer, Operation, and Maintenance at 2000 MW,

WAPDA Hydropower Station Tarbela from 1983 to 1986.
2 Sub Divisional Officer, Operation, and Maintenance in Irrigation

Department Chitral from 1986 to 1992. To operate & maintain
Diesel & Small Hydropower Stations at Chitral.
3 Executive Engineer Operation & Maintenance, in Sarhad Hydel

Development Organization SHYDO, Mingora Swat, from 1992 to
1995 For Administration, Planning, Construction, Operation &
Maintenance of Diesel & Small Hydropower Stations ranging from
100 to 4000 kW, capacities in different Districts like, Chitral, Dir,
Swat, Indus Kohistan and Mansehra
4 Project Manager/Executive Engineer Civil Construction Division

SHYDO, Chitral, for the construction of 4 2 Megawatts, High Head,
Reshun Hydropower Project at Chitral, from 1995 to 2000 in
collaboration with GTZ (Pak German Technical Cooperation).
which includes the following Civil & Electromechanical works,
besides the overall Planning & Administration activities- -
Construction of 2-kilometers, long inclined U-Shaped tunnel

of 3x2 5 meters in size, 20 grad inclination, for the
accommodation of steel Penstock pipe, (through Techno
Engineering Services Islamabad Pakistan)
ii Design & Installation of 1800 meters long, steel Penstock

pipe, with a diameter of 0.87 meters (Through Marathon
Construction Co. Pakistan).
iii Construction of all Civil Intake Structures including

installation of Hydraulic Water Control gates and power
house buildings etc (through Sarwar Constructors Nowshera
Pakistan)
iv. Installation, commissioning and testing of hydropower

equipment, including 2.8 MW Turbines, 4000 kVA
Generators, 5000 kVA Power Transformers, Control /
Protection panels and 33 kV switchgears for 4 2 MW
Hydropower Station & 437 kVA Diesel Generating sets in
collaboration with German Experts
v. Designing, Commissioning & testing of 400-km long

Transmission & Distribution lines (33000, 11000, & 415
Volts) in collaboration with German Experts
5. Executive Engineer, Operation & Maintenance Division, SHYDO, Mingora

Swat, from September 2000, to Jun 2004 to look after 9 small hydropower
stations and 4 Diesel Power stations at different remote areas of
Northwest Frontier Province, including Planning & Administration
Refurbishment of 200 kW Keyal Hydropower Station including all Civil

works in power Channel and Machinery foundation, installation of
Hydropower equipment and construction of 30 km long, 11kV
Transmission Line along with Distribution system in collaboration with
Siemens Pakistan Engineering Co Pakistan.
Renovation of 150 kW Jalkot Hydropower Station at Dassu District

Kohistan in collaboration with Siemens Pakistan Engineering Co Pakistan.
Commissioning & Testing of 18 MW Pehur Hydropower Project in the

capacity of Resident Engineer operation & maintenance
(b) Private Sector:
(i) Project Director, Haji Mohammad Khan & Co. Chitral
Preparation of feasibility study for 1000 kW Hydropower Station at

Ayun District Chitral.
Detailed designing procurement and construction supervision of

Penstock pipes, and E&M equipment for the above said power
station
(ii) General Manger Water & Power Projects, Al-Fajr International

Islamabad
Preparation of bid documents for various Hydropower Projects

in WAPDA, Northern Areas and North West Frontier Province
Installation Commissioning & Testing of Hydropower Equipment
ranging from 2 to 4 MW capacities, in 12 different projects in
Northern Areas & Government of NWFP
Postings
Place of Postings From To Period
i. Junior Maintenance Engineer,

WAPDA Terbela: 1983 1986 3 years
ii. SDO Power Irrigation Chitral: 1986 1992 6 Years
iii. Executive Engineer, O&M SHYDO

Swat. 1992 1995 3 Years
iv. Project Manager, 4.2 MW Reshun

Hydropower Project
SHYDO Chitral: 1995 2000 5 Years
v. Executive Engineer, O&M,

SHYDO Swat: 2000 2003 3Years
vi. Dy Director, Regulation SHYDO/

Project Manager 52 MW,
Koto HPP Dir. 2003 2004 1 Year
vii. Dy Director, Electrical/E&M,

81 MW Malakand-III HPP: 2004 2005 1 year
viii. Deputy Director, Private Power 2005 2007 2 years
ix General Manager,
Power Projects. 2007 2009 2 years
Alfajr International Islamabad,
x. Resident Engineer, O&M,

SHYDO, 18 MW Pehur,
Hydropower Project: 2009 Till date
Curriculum Vitae
Personal details
Name : Mohammad Nadir Khan
Father Name : Mohammad Nadir Khan
N.I.0 12101-7081420-3
Date of Birth 251 ' March 1963
Office Address Room No 203. SI IYDO llouse. 38-2 B. Phase 5 Haat Abad.
Pesha\\ ar. Mi\ her Pakhtunklm a. Pakistan
Phone No : 091-9217354
Office Address • I louse No 302. Street No 2. Sector [8. Phase 6. I la■
at Ahad
Pesha\\ ar
Phone No 0345-9002331
Email uandapur63 a Llmail.com
Education
Date Field of study Institute
1989 M.Sc (Geolou■ :) llnkersit\ ohPesha ar

1987 B.Sc(lIons)(ieoloQ) l'nkersit\ of Peshawar
1984 B.Sc(Math.$) fli\,ersit\ of Peshi.mar
1982 [.Sc Cadet College Kohat
1979 SS Cadet Colleu.e Kohat
Professional Experience
Sarhad Hydel Development Organization Govt of Khyber l'akhtunkhss a
Sep 2009 till date Assistant Director Ranolia

Hydro Power Project
Duties
Supervision/monitoring of- construction activities ofh■ : del
project. Verification disbursement of Consultants and [PC
Contractor Invoices as Dra\\ inf.!. and Dishursinu officer of the project
April 2008 to Aug 2009 Deputy Director

Private Power SHYDO
Duties
To \ isit and certif.\ the h\ del potential sites proposed allotted h\
private sponsors.
To attend meetings and defend court cases of SI IYDO as representative
of Organization Directorate.
1 o facilitate private sponsors investors for the allotment of I-1\ del potential
sites of the province.
Feb 2007 to March 2008 Assistant: Director

(Geology) P&F
Duties
To assist / facilitate Director P&F in day to day
correspondences / meetings.
Aug 2004 tojlan 2007 Assistant: Director

Pehur HPP Distt: Swabi
Duties
Supervision Monitoring of- the construction activities of- the project
Verification / processing of bills of management consultants and [1k' contractor
of the project.
March 2003 to July 2004 Assistant: Director

(Geology) Ptt F
Duties
Involved in framing. of Pc Is of Feasibilities studies Construction
Projects and assistance of Director P&F in official matters
July 2000 to Feb 2003. Assistant: Director Feasibility

of
Study Pehur HPP.
Duties
Supervision of geotechnical subsurface in e',112al1011S 1-.)N, Management
Consultants of the project.
Keeping verification of drilling log record of geotechnical investigation.
Jun 1998 to June 2000 Assistant: Director

(Geology) P& F
Duties
Involved in planning of hy del potential project, of- the province &
framing of pc Is
March 1996 to May 1998 Assistant: Director

Duber Khwar HPP
Duties
Verification of Geological survey/ Top() stir\ e\ of- the project
Supervision of geotechnical inv estigations subsurface drilling by M C
of' the Project
Verification of M C' invoices and entering them into project
record/M.B
titer pressure tests& core logs recovered from underground drilling .
Keeping record of v■
March 1994 to Feb 1996. Assistant: Director Feasibility
Study of Matiltan HPP
Distt: Swat
Duties
Supervision of I opographic/ Geological survevs and
Geotechnical investigations of the project.
Oct 1990 to Oct 1994. Mining Inspector FATA

Dev: Corporation Peshawar
Duties
Supervision / checking of mining activities in FA
to settled areas of the province. Monitoring of movement of minerals from I-KVA to settled Distt:
of the province.
Trainings
Training /Courses Period Institution

Workshop / Seminar on
i d-A :,
3 ripril 2oo4 University of Engineering
Geology / Tunneling and To and
Sedimentation in Dams. 7`h April 2004 Technology, Lahore
Course on Geotechnical 171 ' April Wapda Engineering
Engineering in I lydel "Fo Academy
Projects. ith May 2000 Faisalabad
id A
Rock Blasting 23 ninii 1995 Wah Noble (PVT)
Course To Ltd. Wah,
th A
27 /April 1995 Rawalpindi
BIO DATA/HISTORY OF SERVICE.
• Name: Mr. Noor UI Bashar 2. FIName: Hussain Gul
3. Date of Birth: - 15-04-1957 4. Domicile: District Sawabi
5. Joined Service: Assistant Engineer (B-17) 6. Date of Appointment: 11-12-1988
7. Qualification: B.Sc Civil Engineering
Permanent Address MohaIla Mehmoodyan. Jalbai. Tehsil Lahore. District Sak‘abi.
Present Address at Ahad. House No. 167. Block K-6. Pesal-mar.

Phase-Ill Ha■
TRAINING/COURSES IN COUNTRY
Name Institution Period

Course on \Kipp:\ I im i nceri ng Academ\ Faisal :\had 08 No 1999 to 07 Dec 1999
dropv■ .er Projects
TRAINING/COURSES OUT SIDE THE COUNTRY
Name Institution Period

lo \ kit Stuck. Completed and under
Studs on 07-06-1995 to 07-07-1995
construction H dropov■ er Projects in
Hydropower Projects
Germany. Austria. And Skkitierland
Period Duty/Leave
Post held with BPS Department / Station Remarks
From To Training etc.
I.Assistant knuineer SHYDO 11-12-1988 15-05-1990 1 )ot■

ar
Head Office Peshav■
2. SD() Reshun HPP SHYDO 16-05-199() 02-10-1996 Dot\

(B-17) Reshun Chitral
3. Project Manager SHY IX) 03-10-1996 30-06-2000 Actinv..

Dot■
Shishi HPP (B-I 8) ar
Shish! HPP Peshav■ Charge basis
, Director CI\ it SHY DO

-I-Deput■ 1-07-2000 31-10-2001 Actin2.
Dot■
(Design) (B-18) ar
!lead Office Pesha‘■ charge basis
5-Deptit■Director 0\11 SHYDO 1-11-2001 31-7-2002 Acting

Dot■
(Malakand-I11) HPP Pesha‘‘ar Charge basis
(B-18)
6- Project Manager SHY DO 1-08-2002 Till date Dot■

. Actinv,
Shishi HPP (B-I 8) Shishi tIPP Peshawar Charge basis
,L1 kT:c)
SCHEDULE-VI
Decision on IEE
Name, address of proponent Project Manager,

1
Renolia HPP (SHYD0),
:305 WAPDA House,
Shami Road, Peshawar
Description of project. The Renolia Hydro Power

2.
Project is a small scale
project with a total capacity
of 11.5 MW. From the
beginning of construction to
the commissioning of the
project will take
approximately 36 months.
The Renolia Khwar System
has a total catchments area
of 95 sqm. For the
construction of the various
elements there will be a
permanent loss of 6 22ha of
commonly owned forest/
pasture land Only 0.6ha of
the land required is private
land. Total 252 tress will be
affected by the project and
further 60 will be affected by
the transmission line.
Blasting is also involved in
the project.
Location of project. The project is located in

3
District Kohistan
Date of filing of IEE. 00/06/2008

4.
5. After careful review, the Environmental Protection Agency, Govt.
of NWFP has decided to accord approval of the Initial
Environmental Examination for Renolia Hydro Power Project
(11 5 MW) District Kohistan, in line with the guidelines issued by
Pak. EPA and IEE/EIA Regulations, 7000 subject to the following
terms conditions•-
a) The proponent will adopt all precautionary and mitigatory
measures identified in IEL: report us well as any un-
anticipated impacts during the construction and operation
phase of project.
b) Present right of way of irrigation should be protected
c) Land compensation agreement should be provided to This

Agency before starting activities on the site
d) To minimize erosion, afforestation programme should be
planed and implemented in the catchments area of the
proposed dam.
6. The proponent shall be liable for compliance of section 13, 14 &

18 of 1EE/EIA Regulations 2000, which enunciate the conditions
for approval, confirmation of compliance, entry, inspection and
monitoring of the proposed project.
7 This approval does not absolve the proponent of duty to obtain

any other approval or clearance that may be required under any
other law in force.
8. In exercise of the power under Section 12 of Pakistan

Environmental Protection Act, 1997, the undersigned is pleased
to approve the IEE report of the project with above mentioned
terms & conditions
Dated: Peshawar
Tracking/File.No.
•--
DIRECTOR G-iik/ERAL
EPA, NWFP.
3' d Floor, SDU Building,
Khyber Road
Peshawar.
•

Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Ranolia Hydropower Project (17 MW)
1PROJECT LAYOUT MAP

41
,Duber Khwarl
Ranolia Khwar
ISedling Basin: 144 6 5 Cs

r
re'lt
,-;_tieadrace Canal (Upper)!
,S`t ' E', :.•
Inlet Pond! wer House
1 T
7
, -57
frac%
Forebayj
KKH
(Towarcs
Ty-17110n/ i r Si)
butterP—OTI!d Headrace Canal (Lower)!
KKH
, .,',(Towards Besham/ lslamabad)
)
Prospectus
A JOINT VENTURE OF:
coftsup,Th
SHELADIA
ASSOCLOGI MC O WINROCK
INTERNIII1ONAL
homey Ideas ro Work

A IDC
AL-KASIB GROUP OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
SHELADIA ASSOCIATES, INC. USA Head Office: H. No. 578, Sector E - 6, Phase - 7, Hayatabad
Pakistan Office: H # 58-A, St-51, F11/3 Islamabad. Peshawar. Tel: 0092 91 5890501 Fax: 0092 91 5890502
Tel: 0092 51 8438394, Fax: 0092 51 8438395
Email: ages@ages.com.pk
Email: shetadiapak@gmall.com
RANOLIA HYDROPOWER PROJECT (17 MW)
Introduction
Ranolia Hydropower Project (RHPP), located along Ranolia Khwar ,a tributary of Duber Khwar in
the south west of district Kohistan of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, is a run-of-river type
hydropower plant with ultimate capacity of 17 MW. The Project is proposed to be constructed by
diverting 5 m3/sec water of Ranolia Khwar about 4 Km upstream of the power house.The
Hydropower plant is being constructed about 850 m upstream of Duber Bazar , 20 kilometers north
of Besham. Besham is 272 Km from Islamabad via Abbottabad and 270 Km from Peshawar via
Swat.
Background
In 1994 with assistance of SWISS Government, a feasibility report was prepared for the Project by
M/s ITECO Consultants for total installed capacity of 11.5 MW. The feasibility report was updated
in 2006 by M/s INTEGRATION Environment and Energy Limited of Germany with financial
assistance of ADB.
In July 2009 Sarhad Hydel Development Organization SHYDO with approval of Asian
Development Bank (ADB) engaged Management Consultants (MC) comprising a Joint Venture of
SHELADIA Associates, INC, USA, WINROCK International, USA, AGES Consultants Peshawar
and IDC Islamabad to review the above mentioned feasibility report and to assist the Employer in
implementation of the Project through an EPC Contractor.
The MC collected all available data/documents of the previous studies and carried out detailed
topographic surveys During review of the hydrological data for the period 2005-2008 collected
from the Client and some data collected in the field also, it was observed that the design discharge
could safely be increased from 3.5m3/s to 5 0 m3/s with consequent increase in the installed
capacity of the plant from 11.5 MW to 17 MW with a corresponding total average annual output of
100.5 GWh energy.
Feasibility Review Report was accordingly prepared by MC and submitted to the Client in October,
2009. The Client with the concurrence of the ADB approved the revised status of the Project in
December, 2009.
Project Objectives
Primary objective of the Project is to generate 17 MW hydropower with average annual energy
production of 100.5 GWh.
Project Components
The Project consists of a intake; weir and diversion works; connection channel; sand trap and
headrace canal (upper portion); siphon with inlet and outlet ponds; headrace canal (lower 'portion);
fore-bay; spillway; penstock; valve chamber; powerhouse & tailrace; switchyard; Employer's
offices and Colony, and access roads.
WINROCK 1
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT.
Ranolia Khwar (District Kohistan), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Location
Province, Pakistan
Hydrology
Catchment Area 73 km2
Mean Annual Discharge 4.33 m3 /sec
Total Annual Flow 136 106 m3
Diversion Dam
Type Low height concrete diversion weir
Crest Elevation 1120.50 masl
Crest Length 20.0 m
Maximum height 3.0 m from river bed level
Design Flood (Q100) 854 m3 /sec
Spillway
Type Overflow weir
Design Discharge (Q100) 854 m3/s
Intake & Headwork structures

Intake Side intake —gate controlled
Approach canal Rectangular — reinforced concrete
Settling Basin / Sand trap Reinforced concrete 75.5 m X 16.5 m
Headrace Canal
Length 2,650 m
Type Reinforced concrete
Dimensions Rectangular, 2.5 m X 2.0 m
Bed slope 1:1000
Siphon with inlet and outlet ponds

Type Mild steel pipe, 1.5 m inner diameter
Length 830 m
Maximum head 170 m
Forebay dimensions
Type Reinforced concrete structure
Surface area 400 m2
Spillway Capacity Full inflow with sudden tripping of Turbine
ADIA
4.33,04. 04.
WINROCK
1,4,1 ■
N■
flile+.1
2 DC
•
Penstock
Type Mild steel
Length 684 m
Diameter / thickness 1.50 m internal dia. 12 mm to 18 mm thickness
Power Facilities
Powerhouse Type Surface
Dimensions 28 m x 18 m
Maximum Net Head 408.87 m
Minimum Net Head 401.00 m
Turbine (2 units) Pelton, 2 X 8.5 MW
Generators (2 units) Rated capacity 8.5MV x 2, Power factor 0.8
Transformers Rated output 12.5, Voltage11/132 kV
Installed capacity 17 MW
Average Energy 100.5 GWh
Transmission Facilities
Transmission line length 132 KV — about 2 Km and
11 KV about 4 Km
Environmental Aspect of the Project.

Ranolia Hydropower project is one of a number of small and medium sized hydropower projects
proposed in the valley systems of Khyber Pahktoonkwha Such schemes will help to extend the
national power supply and distribution systems to remote areas At the same time the project will
help in supply Pakistan's overall energy needs.
RHPP falls in a sub-side valley of Pattan Tehsil of District Kohistan, which is located in the Indus
gorge The main Indus valley is hot, dry and arid. The side valleys, which are deeply cut
meandering gorges, have lush green landscape, thickly forest laden hill slopes, white water
streams and milder climate, which makes it a tourist destination. The upper valley reaches remain
glaciated throughout the year.
The people of the area belong to different Kohistani tribes and sub-tribes which account for more
than 97% of the total population of the project area. They mainly speak Kohistani, but most men
also speak Urdu and Pashto. Due to the conservative nature of Kohistanis, there are almost no
outsiders settled in the area. The central village in the project valley is called Ranolia, after which
the project takes its name. This village is situated in the middle of the valley on both sides of the
Khwar with a connecting bridge at the Ranolia bazaar. On either side of the Ranolia Khwar and on
the slopes overlooking the valley, there are additional scattered sparsely distributed clusters of
SHILADIA
EZIWINROCK 3
•
habitation The valley sides are steep but land is terraced wherever possible for agricultural
purposes.
Hydropower is a clean and renewable source of energy and avoids contributions to pollution loads,
which would result from the alternative use of thermal electricity generation. Hence, it is
environment friendly. Thermal power generation plants are known for a large variety of toxic
emissions i.e. carbon dioxide (CO2), particulate matter (PM), sulphur dioxide (S02), carbon
monoxide (CO) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) etc.
Electricity, generated from Ranolia hydropower will be quite useful in minimizing the energy crisis
in Pakistan. This will also help in meeting the electricity requirement of the local population. The
availability of alternative source to meet the energy requirement will reduce consumption of timber
and other fossil fuels. RHPP will also provide job opportunities to the unskilled people of the
locality at general during the construction phase and a limited number of jobs once it is operational.
RHPP has almost no negative social economic and environmental impact on the locality. Similarly
there are no impacts on wildlife or sites of historic or archaeological importance. However, the
main impact identified in the environmental examination is the potential removal of all water flow
from the 5.0 km stretch of the Ranolia Khwar during the winter season when water flow is naturally
much reduced. To mitigate this environmental impact, a minimum of 500 Us water has been
guaranteed to keep the life line intact along the Ranolia Khwar. This provision will also allow the
cleansing of the riverbed and negation of any harmful effects of sewage and rubbish concentrating
in the river system along the 5 km stretch of the Ranolia Khwar.
DC
(„(
4
SUFI ARIA CI WINROCK
/N1/11,1111,/,14
•
Descon Engineering_About Us Page 1 of 1
DEMON
Home About Us Sectors Services Projects Manufacturing Careers Trainings Contact us Eog.reerlog
Inspiration
Search . About Us
ABOUT US
Corporate Overview
CEO s eles5agu
Established in 1977 with 4 employees in Lahore (Pakistan) providing engineering services to process plants. today Descon is a
Monageo•ent major player in the region serving the oil and gas, chemical, petrochemical. cement, power and infrastructure sectors in Pakistan
3t..! Histor, and the Middle East
Escabhulrounts
Descon's Headquarters is located in Lahore. Pakistan The company is well-established in United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia.
Qatar and Kuwait with projects executed in Iraq. Oman and Egypt as well joint ventures include Olayan Descon in Saudi Araoia.
Our Philosophy and Presson Descon International Limited (PD1L)
Descon Integrated Projects Limited (D1PL) is a state-of-the-art engineering office with 500 design personnel Descon operates
seven manufacturing/fabrication facilities in the region to supply industrial process equipment and bulk items iike steel structure
and piping spools
General contracting is the core activity with large projects executed for owners/operators, major EPC companies and
International Oil Companies This strengthis vested in our experienced project team and a large inventory of equipment
All operations have requisite ISO. OHSAS and ASME certifications in addition to Descon's own QA/QC and HSE standards
The company is driven by clearly defined vision and strives to add value to its clients businesses by providing world-class
solutions at cost-effective levels
http://www.descon.com/engineering.php?id=2 2/18/2013
Page 1 of 1
Descon Engineering_About Us
NIB
DESCON
111
Home About Us Sectors Services Pro jects Manufacturing Careers Trainings Contact us Engireerhg
Throughout the years Descon has Learned more than

The art of customer satisfaction,
f the world we're devetoping
v\A• ,4atzed that We care at
,
And W Imbedded in our corporate fabric are measures of
1
or conlk ealth, synergies and welfare of our
1ii . Sta e o ders-mri bk,enviment!
ttik ,. ,,,j
I
Search
About Us > Corporate Overview
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
" Corporate Overview
CEO a Measage
Descon has evolved from engineering roots to a conglomerate which is involved in three main businesses- Engineering, Power
ICS
Managern ,os and Chemicals

Engineering remains the core business, with Descon Engineering Limited as the flagship company The other entitles in this
- Our rriatury
Es tabilsh me n Cs
sphere of activity include
4 Our Philosophy • Descon Engineering Abu Dhabi. United Arab Emirates
• Descon Engineering FZE. Hamriyah Free Zone Sharjah United Arab Emirates
• Descon Engineering Qatar LLC, Doha. Qatar
• Olayan Descon Industrial/Engineering Company. Al fubaol. Saudi Arabia
• Descon Integrated Protects Ltd . Pakistan
• Presson Descon International Ltd. Pakistan
Power business spans two operatin g IPPs and a solution-provider company

• 450 MW Rousch Power Plant Pakistan
• 35 MW Ahern Energy. Pakistan
• Descon Power Solutions Pakistan
The Chemicals business manufactures a diverse range of products for industrial use The entities in this domain are
• Descon Chemicals Ltd Palosain
• Descon Oxychern Ltd . Pakistan
• Descon Corporation Ltd Pakistan
At the corporate level, the combined synergies of ill businesses derive their strength and identity under the brand name of
Descon
2/18/2013
http://www.descon.com/poineering.php?id=9
Descon Engineering_About Us Page 1 of 1
111R
DESCON
1111
Home About Us Sectors Services Projects Manufacturing Careers Trainings Contact us Engineering
Search . About Us > Corporate Overview > CEO's Message
CEO'S MESSAGE
Coreorate Over,ew
CEO's Message I feel confident while sharing that Descon remains on course to become a world-class
engineering organization Over the last three decades, we have maintained a leading
position in a competitive regional market This has been made possible by our
Cu, Histary
entrepreneurial spirit, living up to commitments and unstinted support of the
E>tabt,snrwsqlts stakeholders
• 0,r Pt. -'sophv Our emergence as an EPCC contractor is aligned with a vision of progressing up the
./alue chain to a sustainable extent This process of development shall remain under
focus during the coming years For us what matters most s customer satisfaction
which we have to balance against our growth pattern. At the heart of all operations
remain our team members who have the spirit to push boundaries and of fostering a
culture of accepting challenges
In the coming years. we will continue to reinforce our successful track record. New
contracts shall translate into improved efficiencies by re-mapping our internal
processes using tools like SAP The challenges in the markets continue but we look at
them as opportunities to make ourselves better
Our achievements have been hard-earned and what we have learnt has immense value
in terms of organizational growth It is a matter of pride that the Descon badge
differentiates us from the ordinary I pay tribute to our teams at every level for being a part of the Descon family
Dr. Salman Zakaria

Chief Executive Officer
•
•
Page 1 of 3
Descon Engineering: Our History
DEMON
Home About Us Sectors Services Projects Manufacturing Careers Train.ngs Contact us Ergireer∎ ng
V ..„71
Search About Us > Corporate Overview > Our History
OUR HISTORY
Corporate Overview
■
CEO', Message It all started in a small one room office in Lahore The pioneers of the company came from a fertilizer plant It was the
Management Tar-
entrepreneurial spirit of four people who had a vision of building a lasting institution prominent for its professionalism and
journey
distinguished by the desire of creating a world-class engineering powerhouse Today that vision has come true and the
2 Our History
has been replete with significant strides forward in its history
2 Establishments
Milestones
Cur .Miosoimy
' lit 1977 Company established
1980 Olayan Descon JV formed in Olayan Saudi Arabia
1982 Descon Manufacturing Works commissioned
1982 Office established in Abu Dhabi
fillr 2000 JV engineering company formed with JGC Corporation
. ,
2000 Presson Descon (PD1L) formed, a JV with Presson Canada
!ft
2/18/2013
http://www.descon.com/engineering.php?id=61
Descon Engineering: Our History Page 2 of 3
2001 Fabrication shop established in Ruwais. Abu Dhabi
2002 Yanbu workshop commissioned
I
2004 Descon Engineering Qatar. LLC established
_ 2005 Hamnyah Manufacturing Works in Sharjah commissione
2006 Rousch Power Plant and Altern Energy acquired by Descon
2007 Karachi Manufacturing Works commissioned
2007 First major EPC contract acquired from Fertil. Abu Dhabi
2008 Descon Oxychem commissioned
2010 JGC-Descon becomes Descon Integrated Protects. Limited
2010 Fabrication shop commissioned in Qatar
Repfft No. PPI-36.3-Fina1/12
LOAD FLOW AND

INTERCON?•TECT1ON STUDY
For
17 Ranolia Hydropower Plant near
DuLw, District Kolegstan, KPK
Final Report
(27-09-2012)
POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Registered in England & Wales No. 6363482
UK Office:
3-Sylvester Road. Pakistan Office:
6G-H/2, Wapda Town,
Sudbury Town, Middlesex,
HAO 3AQ, UK Lahore 54770, Pakistan
Phone: +92-42-5182835;
Phone & Fax:+44-(0)208-9223219
Fax: + 92-42-5183156
Email: info@powe.rplannersint.com
www.powerplannersint.com
Report No. PPI-36.3-Final/17
LOAD FLOW AND

INTERCONNECTION STUDY
For
17 MW Ranolia Hydropower Plant near
Duber, District Kohistan, KPK
Final Report
(27-09-2012)
POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL LTD.
Registered in England & Wales No. 6363482
UK Office: Pakistan Office:
3-Sylvester Road, 66-H/2, Wapda Town,
Sudbury Town, Middlesex, Lahore 54770, Pakistan
HAO 3AQ, UK Phone: +92-42-5182835;
Phone & Fax:+44-(0)208-9223219 Fax: + 92-42-5183166
Email: info@powerplannersint.com
www.powerplannersint.com
Executive Summary
• The study objective, approach and methodology have been described and the
plant's data received from the Client is validated.

• The NTDC system data as available with PPI for other studies has been used.
+ The nearest NTDC facilities available for interconnection to Ranolia-HPP will be
the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar ACSR twin bundle rail conductor circuit which
is being operated on a 132 kV level. This line passes about 1.5 km away from the
location of Ranolia-HPP. The substations in the vicinity of Ranolia-HPP are as

follows:
• Duber-Khwar I-IPP 132 kV Substation (15 km upstream from Ranolia-

H PP)
• Khan-Khwar HPP 132 kV Substation (20 km downstream from

Ranolia-HPP)
• Altai Khwar 220/132 kV Substation
+ In view of the above mentioned 132 kV network available in the vicinity of the
site of the Ranolia-HPP, the proposed interconnection scheme is to connect

Ranolia-HPP to the NTDC grid by looping
in-out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-
Khwar 132 kV circuit at Ranolia HPP. The distance of the looping
point from
Ranolia-HPP is 1.5 km. The conductor used will be an ACSR twin bundle rail
conductor which is to be operated at 132 kV level.
+ The Single Line Diag
ram provided by the client, proposes the following
equipment at the 11 kV switchyard of Ranolia HPP:
• Two bus bars of 11 kV with a sectionalizer
• Two breaker/panels of 11 kV to connect two generators to the 11 kV
bus bars
• Two 132/11 kV Transformers

• Two breakers/panels of 11 kV to connect the two 132/11 kV
Transformers
+ The Single Line Diag

ram provided by the client, proposes the following
equipment at 132 kV side of Ranolia FIPP:
• Double bus bar
POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 2 OF 28

Transformers
• Two line bays to connect two lines of 132 kV
• Detailed load flow studies have been carried out for the peak load conditions of
high water season of September 2014 for the proposed scheme under normal and
N-1 contingency conditions to meet the reliability criteria.
• Steady slate analysis by load flow reveals that proposed scheme is adequate to
evacuate the maximum power of 17 MW of the plant under normal and
contingency conditions.
• The short circuit analysis has been carried out to calculate maximum fault levels
at Ranolia-IIPP at 11 kV and 132 kV, and the substations of 220 kV and 132 kV
in its vicinity. We find that the fault currents for the proposed scheme are much
less than the rated short circuit capacities of switchgear installed at these
substations. There are no violations of exceeding the rating of the equipment due
to contribution of fault current from Ranolia-HPP.
• The short circuit level at Ranolia-HPP II kV bus bar is 18.43 kA and 20.83 kA
for 3-phase and 1-phase faults respectively. At the 132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP
the short circuit levels are 7.15 kA and 4.68 kA for 3-phase and 1-phase faults
respectively. Therefore the rating of switchgear for this switching station may be
an industry standard of 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1600 Amps continuous at
132 kV level and 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1250 Amps continuous at 11 kV
level, to accommodate future expansions of generation and transmission in this
arca.
• The dynamic stability analysis of proposed scheme of interconnection has been
carried out. The stability check for the worst case of three phase fault right on the
132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP substation followed by the final trip of 132 kV
circuits emanating from this substation, has been performed for fault clearing of 5
cycles (100 ms) and 9 cycles (180 ms) as understood to be the normal and stuck
breaker fault clearing time of 132 kV protection system. The system is found
strong enough to stay stable and recovered with fast damping. The stability of
system for far end faults of 3-phase occurring at Allai-Khwar 132 kV bus bar has

also been checked. The proposed scheme successfully passed the dynamic
stability checks for near and far faults.
The proposed scheme of interconnection has no technical constraints or problems,

it fulfills all the criteria of reliability and stability under steady state load flow,
contingency load flows, short circuit currents and dynamic/transient conditions;
and is therefore recommended to be adopted.
POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL

PAGE 4 01? 2
Report Contents
1. Introduction 7
1.1. Background 7
1.2. Objectives 7
1.3. Planning Criteria 8
2. Assumptions of Data 9
2.1. Ranolia-11PP Data 9
2.2 Network Data 10
3. Study Approach & Methodology
3.1 Understanding of the Problem 11
3.2 Approach to the Problem 11
4. Development of Scheme of Interconnection 13
4.1 The Existing and ongoing Network 13
4.2 The Scheme of Interconnection of Ranolia-HPP 13
4.3 Ranolia-HPP Switching Station 13
5. Detailed Load Flow Studies 15
5.1. Base Case Load Flow 2014, Without Ranolia-HPP 15
5.2. Load Flow with Ranolia-HPP 15
5.3. Conclusion of Load Flow Analysis 16
6. Short Circuit Analysis 17
6.1 Methodology and assumptions 17
6.2 Fault current calculations without Ranolia — HPP 17
6.3 Fault current calculations with Ranolia - I IPP interconnected 18
6.4 Conclusion of short circuit analysis 19
7. Dynamic Stability Analysis 21
7.1 Assumptions & Methodology 21
7.1.1 Dynamic Models 21
7.1.2 System Conditions 21
7.1.3 Presentation of Results 21
7.1.4 Worst Fault Cases 22
7.2 Dynamic stability simulations 22
POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 5 OF 2$

1. Introduction
1.1 Background
The site of proposed project is a small hydropower project on Ranolia-Khwar
river located about 15 km downstream from the under construction Duber Khwar
1-IP13 and about 20 km upstream from recently completed Khan Khwar HEPP, in
the area of Duber in district Kohistan. The location of Ranolia-HPP is shown in
the Google map attached in Appendix-A. The net output planned to be generated
from the site is about 17 MW of electrical power. The project is expected to start
commercial operation by the middle of the year 2014. The electricity generated
from this project would be supplied to the grid system of NTDC through 132 kV
grid of NTDC available in the vicinity of this project.
1.2 Objectives
The overall objective of the Study is to evolve an interconnection scheme between
Ranolia Hydropower Project and NTDC network, for stable and reliable
evacuation of 17 MW of electrical power generated from this plant, fulfilling N-1

reliability criteria. The specific objectives are:
1. To develop scheme of interconnections at 132 kV for which right of way
(ROW) and space at the terminal substations would be available.
2. To determine the performance of interconnection scheme during steady
state conditions of system, normal and N-1 contingency, through load-

flow analysis.
3. To check if the contribution of fault current from this new plant
increases the fault levels at the adjoining substations at 220 kV and 132
kV voltage levels to be within the rating of equipment of these
substations, and also determine the short circuit ratings of the proposed
equipment of the substation at Ranolia-I-1PP.
4. To check if the interconnection withstands dynamic stability criteria of
post fault recovery with good damping after 3-phase faults on the
system.
II.la
II I.
,.14- POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 7 OF 28
1.3 Planning Criteria
The planning criteria required to be fulfilled by the proposed interconnection is as

follows:
Steady State:
Voltage + 5 %, Normal Operating Condition
± 10 %, Contingency Conditions
Frequency
50 Hz, Continuous, ± 1% variation steady state
49.2 - 50.5 Hz, Short Time
Power Factor 0.80 Lagging; 0.9 Leading
llynamieffransient:
The system should revert back to normal condition after dying out of transients
without loosing synchronism with good damping.
1. Total normal fault clearing time from the instant of initiation of fault current to
the complete interruption of current, including the relay time and breaker
interruption time to isolate the faulted element, is equal to 100 ms (5 cycles) for
the systems of 132 kV and above.
In case of failure of primary protection (stuck breaker case), the total fault
clearing time from the instant of initiation of fault current to the complete
interruption of current to isolate the faulted element, including the primary
protection plus the backup protection to operate and isolate the fault, is equal to
180 ms (9 cycles) for 132 kV and higher voltage levels.

PAGE 8 OF 28
2. Assumptions of Data
The number of generating units is two as proposed by DESCON, the overall executors
for Ranolia-I-IPP. The detailed electrical parameters have been provided and are given
as follows:
2.1 Ranolia-HPP data
Generator data:
Number of Generating Units =2
Installed capacity of generating units = 2 x 8.5 MW
Lump sum maximum generating capacity = 17 MW (2x8.5 MW)
Power factor = 0.80 lagging, 0.9 leading
Lump sum MVA capacity = 2 x 10.625 MVA (at PF = 0.80) = 21.25 MVA
Sub transient reactance, Xd" = 0.1538 PU, 0.2013 PU, 0.0548 PU
(+ve, -ye and 0 sequence respectively)
Generating Voltage = 11 kV
The sizing of each individual machine is important for dynamic stability analysis. We
have modeled two machines each of 8.5 MW, as per the date provided by the client,
with following parameters
Inertia Constant VI (turbine + generator) = 1.90 MWs/MVA
A salient pole machine with following typical parameters has been assumed
Synchronous reactance, Xd = 0.9626 PU
Transient reactance, Xd = 0.2162 PU
Sub transient reactance, Xd = 0.1538 PU
Open Circuit Transient Time Constant T do = 5.6222 Sec
Open Circuit Sub-Transient Time Constant T.. do = 0.0514 Sec

2.2 Network data
The 132 kV networks available kir interconnection to Ranolia-1-IPP near it arc as

shizmn in Sketches in Appendix-A.

PAGE 10 OF 28
3. Study Approach and Methodology
3.1 Understanding of the Problem
The Ranolia 17 MW is going to be a small hydropower project in Duber which is in

the district of Kohistan, KPK of the country.
The nearest NTDC facility available for interconnection will be the Duber Khwar to
Allai Khwar line which is a ACSR twin bundle rail conductor line and is currently
being operated on a 132 kV level. This line is about 1.5 km away from the site of
Ranolia HPP. The addition of Ranolia-HPP in this region will help to supply the
significant demand in the load centers around Mansehra and thus provide relief to
source substation which are further away from this area.
The adequacy of NTDC network of 220 kV and 132 kV around Ranolia HPP would
be investigated in this study for absorbing and transmitting this power fulfilling the
reliability criteria.
3.2 Approach to the problem
The consultant has applied the following approaches to the problem:
• A base case network model has been prepared for the year 2014, which is the
commissioning year of Ranolia-HPP, comprising all 500kV, 220kV and 132
kV system, envisaging the load forecast, the generation additions and
transmission expansions for that year.
• Month of September 2014 has been selected for the study because it is high
water season and the proposed IIPP plus the neighboring hydel power plants
of Allai Khwar, Khan-Khwar and Duber-Khwar would be running at their
maximum outputs.
• Interconnection scheme without any physical constraints, like right of way or
availability of space in the terminal substations, have been identified.
• Performed technical system studies for peak load conditions to confirm
technical feasibility of the interconnections. The scheme has been subjected to
standard analysis like load flow and short circuit, and transient stability study
to check the strength of the machines and the proposed interconnection
scheme under disturbed conditions.
,r71- POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 11 OF 2$

• Determine the relevant equipment for the proposed technically feasible
scheme.
• Recommend the technically most feasible scheme of interconnection.

4. Development of Scheme of Interconnection
4.1 The Existing and Ongoing Network
The nearest NTDC facilities available for interconnection to Ranolia-HPP will be the
Dubcr-Khwar to Allai-Khwar ACSR twin bundle rail conductor circuit which is being
operated on a 132 kV level. This line passes about 1.5 km away from the location of
Ranolia-HPP. Substations in the vicinity of Ranolia-HPP are as follows:
• Duber-Khwar LIPP 132 kV Substation (15 km upstream from Ranolia-I IPP)
• Khan-Khwar HPP 132 kV Substation (20 km downstream from Ranolia-I IPP)
• Allai Khwar 220/132 kV Substation
There is strong 220 kV network connecting Allai 220/132 kV grid station with
Manschra, Islamabad-New other 220 kV substations in the Islamabad area. A strong
system helps in stable operation of a power plant.
4.2 The Scheme of Interconnection of Ranolia-HPP
Keeping in view of the above mentioned 132 kV network available in the vicinity of
the site of the Ranolia-HPP, the proposed interconnection scheme is to connect
Ranolia-HPP to the NTDC grid by looping in-out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar
132 kV circuit at Ranolia HPP. The distance of the looping point from Ranolia-HPP is
1.5 km. The conductor used will be ACSR twin bundle rail conductor which is to be
operated at 132 kV level.
4.3 Ranolia-HPP Switching Station
Main Single Line Diagram in Appendix-A shows the main equipment of substation of
132/11 kV at Ranolia-1-IPP switchyard as provided by the client. It consists of as
follows:
4.3.1 Ranolia-HPP Switching Station (11 kV side)

• Two breaker/panels of 11 kV to connect two generators to the 11 kV bus bars
• Two breakers/panels of 11 kV to connect the two 132/11 kV Transformers
i."111
1.1.1
4.3.1 Ranolia-FIPP Switching Station (132 kV side)
The 132 kV side of Rano would require the following
• Double bus bar

• Two breaker bays of 132 kV to connect the two 132/11 kV Transformers

PAGE 14 OF 28
5. Detailed Load Flow Studies
5.1 Base Case 2014, Without Ranolia-HPP

A base case has been developed for the peak load of the year 2014 which occurs in
September, using the network data of PEPCO available with PPI. The peak loads of
the year 2014 for PESCO, which is the nearest DISCO, have been modeled based on
annual growth rate of 8.0 per cent reaching to the tune of 2630 MW (diversified) by
that year.
The results of load flow for this base case are plotted in Exhibit 0.0 of Appendix-B.
The system plotted in this Exhibit comprises of 220 kV and 132 kV network around
Ranolia HPP and its surrounding substations including Khan-Khwar, Allai-Khwar,
Duber-Khwar, Mansehra etc.
The load flow results show that the power flows on all the circuits are within their
normal rating. The voltage profile of these surrounding substations is also within
normal limits.
For N-1 contingency conditions we have performed the following cases:

Exhibit 0.1 Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 0.2 Allai-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 0.3 Altai to Mansehra 220 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 0.4 Mansehra-N to Mansehra 132 kV Single Circuit Out
In both cases the power flows on all circuits remain within their ratings. Thus we find
that there are no capacity constraints in terms of MW or MVA flow in the 220 kV or
132 kV network available in the vicinity of Ranolia-HPP for its connectivity under
normal and contingency conditions.
5.2 Load Flow with Ranolia-HPP

The scheme of interconnection modeled in the load flow for Ranolia-HPP is to loop
in-out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV circuit at Ranolia-HPP. The distance
of the looping point from Ranolia HPP is 1.5 km. The conductor used is ACSR twin
bundle rail conductor designed for 220 kV but will be operated at 132 kV level.

The results of load flow with Ranolia-HPP interconnected as per proposed scheme are
shown in Exhibit 1.0 in Appendix-B. We see that the 17 MW from Ranolia-HPP
combined with about 68.6 MW from Duber-Khwar HPP flows towards Allai-Khwar
through the Ranolia-1-11313 to Allai-Khwar 132 kV single circuit. About 61.4 MW
flows from Duber-Khwar towards Khan-Khwar, where it combines with the output of
Khan-Khwar HPP and a total of 133 MW flows towards Allai-Khwar on the Khan-
Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV single circuit. At Allai-Khwar the power from these
HPPs is stepped up to 220 kV. The combined power from Allai-Khwar, Duber-
Khwar, Khan-Khwar and Ranolia-HPP is then dispersed through a D/C of 220 kV
towards Mansehra 220 kV substation.
The power flows on the circuits are seen well within the rated capacities and the
voltages on the bus bars are also within the permissible operating range off 5 % off
the nominal.
We find no capacity constraints on 220 kV or 132 kV circuits under normal

conditions i.e. without any outages of circuits.
N-1 contingency analysis has been carried out and the plotted results are attached in
Appendix — B as follows;
Exhibit 1.1 Ranolia-I-IPP to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 1.2
Ranolia-HPP to Duber-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 1.3
Khan-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 1.4 Allai to Mansehra 220 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 1.5 Mansehra-N to Mansehra 132 kV Single Circuit Out
In all the above contingency cases, we find that in the event of outage of any circuit,
the intact circuits remain within the rated capacity.
Also the bus bar voltages are well within the rated limits in all the contingency events.
Thus there are no constraints in this scheme.
5.3 Conclusion of Load Flow Analysis
From the analysis discussed above, we conclude that the proposed connection of
Ranolia-HPP with the NTDC grid by looping in-out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar
132 kV circuit is adequate to evacuate the power of Ranolia HPP under normal as
well as contingency conditions.

6. Short Circuit Analysis
6.1 Methodology and Assumptions
The methodology of IEC 909 has been applied in all short circuit analyses in this
report for which provision is available in the PSS/E software used for these studies. .
The maximum fault currents have been calculated with the following assumptions
under IEC 909:
• Set tap ratios to unity
• Set line charging to zero
• Set shunts to zero in positive sequence
• Desired voltage magnitude at bus bars set equal to 1.10 P.U. i.e. 10 % higher
than nominal, which is the maximum permissible voltage under contingency
condition.
For evaluation of maximum short circuit levels we have assumed contribution in the
fault currents from all the installed generation capacity of hydel, thermal and nuclear
plants in the system in the year 2014 i.e. all the generating units have been assumed
on-bar in fault calculation's simulations.
The assumptions about the generator and the transformers data are the same as
mentioned in Ch.2 of this report.
6.2 Fault Current Calculations without Ranolia-HPP
In order to assess the short circuit strength of the network of 220 kV and 132 kV
without Ranolia-I-IPP for the grid of NTDC in the vicinity of the site of the Plant near
Duber, fault currents have been calculated for balanced three-phase and unbalanced
single-phase short circuit conditions. These levels will not only give us the idea of the
fault levels without Ranolia-1-IPP and later on how much the contribution of fault
current from Ranolia-EIPP may add to the existing levels, but also we get a feel of the
probable nodes to connect this Power Plant depending on their relative short circuit
strength.
The results are attached in Appendix — C.
The maximum 3-phase and 1-phase short circuit levels have been represented
graphically on the bus bars of 220 kV and 132 kV along with fault current
PP, POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 17 OF 28

contributions from the incoming circuits, which are shown in the Exhibit 2 attached in
Appendix-C.
The fault currents in the Exhibits are given in polar coordinates i.e. the magnitude and
the angle of the current. The total fault current is shown below the bus bar whereas
the contribution to the fault current from the adjoining sources is shown on the lines
and transformers connected to that bus.
The tabular output of the short circuit calculations is also attached in Appendix-C for
the 220 kV and 132 kV bus bars of our interest i.e. the substations connecting in the
220 kV and 132 kV circuits lying close to Ranolia-HPP. The total maximum fault
currents for 3-phase and 1-phase short circuit at these substations are summarized in
Table 6.1. We see that the maximum fault currents do not exceed the short circuit
ratings of the equipment at these 220 kV and 132 kV substations which normally are
20 kA, 25 kA or 31.5 kA for older substations and 40 kA for new substations.
Table-6.1
Maximum Short Circuit Levels without Ranolia-IIPP
kV 3-Phase Fault Current, 1-Phase Fault Current,
Substation
kA kA
Manschra 220 13.64 11.60
Allai 220 9.58 9.45
Manseh•a-N 132 14.55 13.23
132 9.80 8.91
Khan-Khwar 132 8.76 6.28
lluber-Khwar 132 7.38 4.86
6.3 Fault Current Calculations with Ranolia- HPP interconnected

Fault currents have been calculated for the electrical interconnection of proposed
scheme. Fault types applied are three phase and single-phase at 132 kV and 11 kV
bus bars of Ranolia-HPP itself and other bus bars of the 220 kV and 132 kV
substations in the electrical vicinity of Ranolia-11113
. The graphic results of maximum
3-phase and 1-phase fault currents are indicated as follows;
The tabulated results of short circuit analysis showing all the fault current
contributions with short circuit impedances on 220 kV and 132 kV bus bars of the
network in the electrical vicinity of Ranolia-FIPP and the 132 kV and 11 kV bus bars

PAGE 18 OF 28
of Ranolia-fiPP are placed in Appendix-C. Brief summary of fault currents at
significant bus bars of our interest are tabulated in Table 6.2
Table-6.2
Maximum Short - v - Le els ..... .■
••••-••••• l•A
kV 3-Phase Fault Current, 1-Phase Fault Current,

Substation
kA kA
Mansehra 220 13.68 11.62
Allai 220 9.66 9.49
Manschra-N 132 14.57 13.23
Allai-Khwar 132 10.06 9.28
Khan-Khwar 132 9.00 6.35
Duber-Khwar 132 7.66 4.92
Ranolia-HPP 132 7.15 4.68
Ranolia-HPP 11 18.43 20.83
Comparison of Tables 6.1 and 6.2 show slight increase in short circuit levels for three-
phase and single — phase faults due to connection of Ranolia-TIFF on the 132 kV bus
bars in its vicinity; and some rise on the 220 kV substations of Allai and Manschra.
We find that even after some increase, these fault levels are much below the rated
short circuit values of the equipment installed on these substations. The short circuit
level at Ranolia-FIPP 11 kV bus bar is 18.43 kA and 20.83 kA for 3-phase and 1-
phase faults respectively. At the 132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-1-IPP the short circuit
levels are 7.15 kA and 4.68 kA for 3-phase and 1-phase faults respectively. Therefore
the rating of switchgear for this switching station may be an industry standard of 31.5
kA (short time 3 sec) and 1600 Amps continuous at 132 kV level and 31.5 kA (short
time 3 sec) and 1250 Amps continuous at 11 kV level. It would provide large margin
for any future increase in short circuit levels due to future generation additions and
network reinforcements in this area.
6.4 Conclusion of Short Circuit Analysis

The short circuit analysis results show that for the proposed scheme of
interconnection of Ranolia-FIPP, we don't find any problem of violations of short
circuit ratings of the already installed equipment on the 220 kV and 132 kV
• •
•
NC POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 19 OF 28
equipment of substations in the vicinity of Ranolia-HPP due to fault current
contributions from this power house under three-phase faults as well as single phase
faults.
The short circuit level at Ranolia-HPP 11 kV bus bar is 18.43 kA and 20.83 kA for 3-
phase and 1-phase faults respectively. At the 132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP, the
short circuit levels are 7.15 kA and 4.68 kA for 3-phase and 1-phase faults
respectively. Therefore the rating of switchgear for this switching station may be an
industry standard of 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1600 Amps continuous at 132 kV
level and 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1250 Amps continuous at 11 kV level, taking
care of any future generation additions in its electrical vicinity.

7. Dynamic Stability Analysis
7.1 Assumptions & Methodology

7.1.1 Dynamic Models
The assumptions about the generator and its parameters are the same as mentioned in
Ch.2 of this report.
We have employed the generic dynamic models available in the PSS/E model library
for dynamic modeling of the generator, exciter and the governor as follows;
Generator GENSAL
Excitation System EXSTI
Speed Governing System HYGOV
The generator parameters have been assumed as supplied by DESCON and described
in Section 2.1.
11 = 1.9 MWs/MVA (turbine and generator combined)

7.1.2 System Conditions
We have used the system conditions of September 2014, which represent high water
dispatch conditions with maximum outputs of power from other HPPs such as Duber
Khwar, Allai-Khwar, Khan-Khwar, Jagran etc.
The proposed scheme connection of Ranolia-HPP with the NTDC grid by looping in-
out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV circuit has been modeled in the dynamic
simulation.
All the power plants of WAPDA /NTDC from Tarbela to Hub have been dynamically
represented in the simulation model.
7.1.3 Presentation of Results
The plotted results of the simulations runs are placed in Appendix-D. Each
simulation is run for its first one second for the steady state conditions of the system
prior to fault or disturbance. This is to establish the pre fault/disturbance conditions of
the network under study were smooth and steady. Post fault recovery has been
monitored for nine seconds. Usually all the transients due to non-linearity die out
within 2-3 seconds after disturbance is cleared in the system.
MI II
MI WI

7.1.4 Worst Fault Cases
Three phase faults arc considered as the worst disturbance in the system. We have
considered 3-phase fault in the closest vicinity of Ranolia-HPP i.e. right at the 132
kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP substation, cleared in 5 cycles, as normal clearing time for
132 kV i.e. 100 ms, followed by permanent trip of 132 kV single circuit emanating
from this substation.
7.2 Dynamic Stability Simulations' Results

7.2.1 Fault at 132 kV Near Ranolia-HPP
We applied three-phase fault on Ranolia-HPP 132 kV bus bar, cleared fault in 5
cycles (100 ms) followed by trip of 132 kV circuit between Ranolia-HPP and Allai-
Khwar. We monitored different quantities for one second pre-fault and nine cycles
after clearance of fault (post-fault) conditions and plotted the results attached in
Appendix — D and discussed as follows;
Fig. 1.1 Rotor Angles
The rotor angles of the generators of Ranolia-HPP, Duber-Khwar, Khan-Khwar,

Allai-Khwar, Jagran and Tarbela are plotted relative to machines at Tarbela. The
results show that the rotor angle of Ranolia-1-IPP gets back after the first swing and
damps down quickly. Similarly the rotor angles of other machines swing little after
the fault and damp fast after clearing of fault. The system is strongly stable and very
strong in damping the post fault oscillations.
Fig. 1.2 Bus Voltages
The bus voltages of 11 kV and 132 kV bus bars of Ranolia-HPP, the 132 kV bus bas
of Allai-Khwar, Khan-Khwar, Duber-Khwar 132 kV and Allai 220 kV are plotted.
The results show quick recovery of the voltages after clearing of fault.
Fig. 1.3 Frequency
We see the system frequency recovers back to normal quickly after fault clearance.
Fig. 1.4 MW Flow on Ranolia-HPP to Khan Khwar 132 kV circuit
Followed by clearing of fault, the trip of the 132 kV circuit from Ranolia -1-IPP to
Allai-Khwar 132 kV circuit caused the entire output of Ranolia-HPP, Duber-Khwar
HPP and Khan-Khwar 11PP to flow through the circuit of 132 kV between Ranolia -
1-IPP and Allai-Khwar. We plotted the flows of MW and MVAR on this intact circuit
•r.. POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL PAGE 22 OF 23

and see that the power flows on this circuit attains to steady state level with power
swings damping down fast.
Fig. 1.5 MW/MVAR Output of Generators of Ranolia-HPP
The pre-fault output of Ranolia was 17 MW and it gets back to the same output
quickly after fast damping of the oscillations in its output. However MVAR output
acquires equilibrium at a new value.
Fig. 1.6 Speed and mechanical power of Generators at Ranolia -HPP
The speed deviation of the generator, after clearing fault, damps down after the fault
fault. The transients in mechanical power also damp quickly and settle to a new
equilibrium.
7.2.2 Fault at 132 kV near Ranolia HPP (Stuck Breaker)

In the case of failure of primary protection (stuck breaker case), the total fault clearing
time from the instant of initiation of fault current to the complete interruption of
current to isolate the faulted element, including the primary protection plus the
backup protection to operate and isolate the fault, is equal to 180 ms (9 cycles). To
simulate this extreme case scenario we applied three-phase fault on the 132 kV bus
bar of Ranolia-HPP. The fault is cleared in 9 cycles (180 ms) as standard clearing
time for 132 kV systems, followed by trip of 132 kV circuit between Ranolia-HPP
and Allai-Khwar. We monitored different quantities for one second pre-fault and nine
cycles after clearance of fault (post-fault) conditions and plotted the results attached in
Appendix — D and discussed as follows;
results show that the rotor angle of Ranolia-HPP gets back after the first swing and
The bus voltages of 11 kV and 132 kV bus bars of Ranolia-FIPP, the 132 kV bus bas
of Allai-Khwar, Khan-Khwar, Duber-Khwar 132 kV and Allai 220 kV are plotted.
The results show quick recovery of the voltages after clearing of fault.
NV II
via MI
,T1- POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL

PAGE 23 OF 28
Fig. 2.3 Frequency
Fig. 2.4 MW Flow on Ranolia-HPP to Khan Khwar 132 kV circuit
Followed by clearing of fault, the trip of the 132 kV circuit from Ranolia -HPP to
Allai-Khwar 132 kV circuit caused the entire output of Ranolia-HPP, Duber-Khwar
HPP and Khan-Khwar HPP to flow through the circuit of 132 kV between Ranolia -
1-IPP and Allai-Khwar. We plotted the flows of MW and MVAR on this intact circuit
and see that the power flows on this circuit attains to steady state level with power
swings damping down fast.
Fig. 2.5 MW/MVAR Output of Generators of Ranolia-HPP
The pre-fault output of Ranolia -HPP was 17 MW and it gets back to the same output
equilibrium.
7.2.3 Fault at 132 kV near Allai-Khwar (Far End Fault)

We applied three-phase fault on the 132 kV bus bar of Allai-Khwar to study the
impact of a disturbance in the grid on the performance of the plant. The fault is
cleared in 5 cycles (100 ms) as standard clearing time for 132kV systems, followed by
trip of 132 kV circuit between Allai-Khwar to Khan-Khwar. We monitored different
quantities for one second pre-fault and nine cycles after clearance of fault (post-fault)
conditions and plotted the results attached in Appendix — D and discussed as follows;

results show that the rotor angle of Ranolia-HPP gets back after the first swing and

The bus voltages of 11 kV and 132 kV bus bars of Ranolia-HPP, the 132 kV bus bas
of Allai-Khwar, Khan-Khwar, Mansehra 220 kV and Allai 220 kV are plotted. The
results show quick recovery of the voltages after clearing of fault.
Fig. 3.3 Frequency
Fig. 3.4 MW Flow on Ranolia-HPP to Allai-Khwar 132 kV circuit
Followed by clearing of fault, the trip of the 132 kV circuit from Allai-Khwar to
Khan-Khwar 132 kV circuit caused the entire output of Ranolia-HPP, Duber-Khwar
and Khan-Khwar HPP to flow through the circuit of 132 kV between Ranolia -HPP
and Allai-Khwar. We plotted the flows of MW and MVAR on this intact circuit and
see that the power flows on this circuit attains to steady state level with power swings
damping down fast.
Fig. 3.5 MW/M VAR Output of Generators of Ranolia-1-IPP
The pre-fault output of Ranolia -HPP was 17 MW and it gets back to the same output
equilibrium.
7.3 Conclusion of Dynamic Stability Analysis

The results of dynamic stability show that the system is very strong and stable for
the proposed scheme for the severest possible faults of 132 kV systems near to and far
of Ranolia-HPP. Therefore there is no problem of dynamic stability for
interconnection of Ranolia-HPP; it fulfills all the criteria of dynamic stability.
IS 1116
If SI
..,4- POWER PLANNERS INTERNATIONAL

PAGE 25 OF 28
8. Conclusions
• The study objective, approach and methodology have been described and the
plant's data received from the Client is validated.
• The NTDC system data as available with PP1 for other studies has been used.
• The nearest NTDC facilities available for interconnection to Ranolia-HPP will be

the Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar ACSR twin bundle rail conductor circuit which
is being operated on a 132 kV level. This line passes about 1.5 km away from the
location of Ranolia-HPP. The substations in the vicinity of Ranolia-HPP are as
follows:
• Duber-Khwar HPP 132 kV Substation (15 km upstream from Ranolia-
HPP)
• Khan-Khwar HPP 132 kV Substation (20 km downstream from
Ranolia-I-1 PP)
• Allai Khwar 220/132 kV Substation
• In view of the above mentioned 132 kV network available in the vicinity of the
site of the Ranolia-HPP, the proposed interconnection scheme is to connect
Ranolia-HPP to the NTDC grid by looping in-out the Duber-Khwar to Allai-
Khwar 132 kV circuit at Ranolia HPP. The distance of the looping point from
Ranolia-HPP is 1.5 km. The conductor used will be an ACSR twin bundle rail
conductor which is to be operated at 132 kV level.
• The Single Line Diagram provided by the client, proposes the following
eq uipment at the 11 kV switchyard of Ranolia HPP:
• Two breaker/panels of 11 kV to connect two generators to the 11 kV
bus bars
Transformers
• The Single Line Diagram provided by the client, proposes the following
eq uipment at 132 kV side of Ranolia HPP:
• Double bus bar

Transformers
• Detailed load flow studies have been carried out for the peak load conditions of
high water season of September 2014 for the proposed scheme under normal and
N-1 contingency conditions to meet the reliability criteria.
❖ Steady state analysis by load flow reveals that proposed scheme is adequate to
evacuate the maximum power of 17 MW of the plant under normal and
contingency conditions.
• The short circuit analysis has been carried out to calculate maximum fault levels
at Ranolia-I-IPP at 11 kV and 132 kV, and the substations of 220 kV and 132 kV
in its vicinity. We find that the fault currents for the proposed scheme are much
less than the rated short circuit capacities of switchgear installed at these
substations. There are no violations of exceeding the rating of the equipment due
to contribution of fault current from Ranolia-HPP.
• The short circuit level at Ranolia-l-IPP 11 kV bus bar is 18.43 kA and 20.83 kA
for 3-phase and 1-phase faults respectively. At the 132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP
the short circuit levels are 7.15 kA and 4.68 kA for 3-phase and 1-phase faults
respectively. Therefore the rating of switchgear for this switching station may be
an industry standard of 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1600 Amps continuous at
132 kV level and 31.5 kA (short time 3 sec) and 1250 Amps continuous at 11 kV
level, to accommodate future expansions of generation and transmission in this

area.
The dynamic stability analysis of proposed scheme of interconnection has been
carried out. The stability check for the worst case of three phase fault right on the
132 kV bus bar of Ranolia-HPP substation followed by the final trip of 132 kV
circuits emanating from this substation, has been performed for fault clearing of 5
cycles (100 ms) and 9 cycles (180 ms) as understood to be the normal and stuck
breaker fault clearing time of 132 kV protection system. The system is found
strong enough to stay stable and recovered with fast damping. The stability of
system for far end faults of 3-phase occurring at Allai-Khwar 132 kV bus bar has

also been checked. The proposed scheme successfully passed the dynamic
stability checks for near and far faults.
The proposed scheme of interconnection has no technical constraints or problems,

it fulfills all the criteria of reliability and stability under steady state load flow,
contingency load flows, short circuit currents and dynamic/transient conditions;
and is therefore recommended to be adopted.

sap!puaddv
35.C4810556N , 72,89350833E -
023'2 Google
:mace a., 2012 GeoEye
2010 a 20t0
35'02'53.93' N 72'5335.50' E elev 2404 ft
Existing 132 kV Network Near Ranolia
Without Ranolia HPP
Duber Khwar
Khan Khwar
Allai
To Mansehra
Legend
132kV Sketch-1
220kV Interconnection Study of Ranolia HPP
Power Planners International

D.E SLEET DWG 1.3
2012 1 Ranolia Sketch-1 DWG
Existing 132 kV Network Near Ranolia
With Ranolia HPP
Duber Khwar
Ranolia HPP
Altai
To Mansehra
Legend
132kV Sketch-2
220kV Interconnection Study of Ranoiia HPP
Proposed
Power Planners International
Cs'E SHEET ,
2012 1 Rano Sketch-2 DWG "'
2
10
N0DCC3 ANN On O.,a
For Control. Protection and Parameter

VG unit No 2 system some os unit No.1
3.-113SGS110.
LEGEND
RATED VOLTAGE
-TV VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER
WrrrFrt -TA CURRENT TRANSFORMER

-0 VACUUM CE
-F2 LIGHTNING ARRESTER
-SW1 145KV DISCONNECTOR
-NES EARTHING SWITCH

111. Kaaf311.3.7.-.
131.707S-4-103
-OF SFS C3
-MFM MULTIFUNCTION METER
-NO NORMAL OPEN
E- SPARE
s ISSUED FOR APPROVAL
-G2
I LEVEL 1
1...43,3:113 3.11 7 I/ 700 •0 0003'4

US0••,S3
I 1/.61-11 rsquanrcw Aa•ao.
331.133. 0 3rIp ..311% 13. 7.
7 117.
s 00rac cwro
CA1411
rogSmavs•:S131.131,31.
■11/1,131311 VT•111.
o
dd ' SHYDO
DARNAD IVIDEL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
1,171.1,K.F.01,■
•
man. ef K.P.K Peshawar
GoLln-Pull seswo 11.3•11.30AS
C.011743C7.1
.sereneemec.sscarsve orb.. r„.1 TRED

11 010. OAP 0.111131,1e...• DRSCON - TRIED CONSORTIUM
.p.1.7-7 Me
0.1 vet33X 11331 RkNOLIA HYDRO POWER PROJECT

als !woe, •3,31
01,3.11C 33W .113.33
saa SIN37A30. .711.1.31.33.
0,313•101 1 33,-3suan 1,0 ..31.31 /VISA, ran a7,
37, 3,k , 330C,61.3 01160,4 3,41.11.13633-ss, MAIN SINGLE LINE CIAGRAM
C3■ 10-1u, en, tsre•-■ ars ss33.333, •-■ .... ,33.3 Verslon 2
a' 11.71 tun. F• 1,4 -aresmts P• moo Sias 00,31-3-11.,■ • S•31,330,33 1/ 3,-1113 WT.., 31,1
3 "owl Bra macron sevs-rl 133•3 000 r/aut am.. scum.. 3-3,370 17.737r...3 ,
77, 733143
11 013, ssms
• .0.7e7,.......7e133•70.1. ps‘rans a/330 0:0-3,33mso Iryeesto 8. AtaylM11,1: RHP-E00-001 1 OF t IJ
■
Yri OSAVY,O•
1IMIAITOR R1.6, Ls*JMC#!(3 1/7707X.00074 Or 310 0.03 5 00300'E0 41. 06015 aR
0E377070 57 11,1
311(3071 077,1000 0603.-7 011, 0•11
MANAGEMENT Consultants (RHPP) Tel: 091-5890501
[A JV of SHELADIA, WINROCK, AGES & IDC)
Fax: 0915890501
H # 578, Sector E-6, Phase-7, Hayatabad, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan E-mail: rhpproject@qmail.com
Date: February 07, 2012
Our ref: RHPP/MC-TUE-2/123

Your ref:
Project Manager
DESCON-TRIED Consortium
18th Km, Ferozpur Road
Lahore, Pakistan
Attention : Dr. Mohammad Nadeem
SUBJECT: PLANT DESIGN, PROCUREMENT & CONSTRUCTION OF 17 MW RANOLIA

HYDROPOWER PROJECT (RHPP) — ELECTRICAL AND OTHER DRAWINGS.
Dear sir,
Reference is made to our letter RHPP/MC-TU130/102 dated December 08, 2011 regarding
connection to the 132kv transmission line, a basic and conceptual single line diagram duly
approved by NTDC/WAPDA is attached for your reference and use for initiating the detailed
designing of the 132kv switchyard.
The looping In & Out of Dubar Khwar — Khan Khwar 132 kv single circuit at the switchyard of
Ranolia hydropower project through a 132 kv D/C line on twin bundled Rail conductor would be an
appropriate interconnection arrangement for its dispersal of power to the National Grid.
You are therefore requested to submit for the Employer's approval a formal single line diagram
showing the rating of each equipment along with switchyard layout drawings.
Yours faithfully
at4-1
Team Leader
For Management Consultants
Encl: As stated
Filing 130
Distribution: Addressee
IMW1NROCK PM (SHYDO)
SialeatA
(?Ti IDC SHELADIA, AGES, CS, ECM Specialist File
Doc ref. Electrical and other Drawings
07 Feb 2012 3:34AM HP LASERJET FAX
0919212000
16 Jan 2012 10:08RM AP LASERJET FAX
091 9212000
; „
DOPER )(Hi/FIR
LO OP DUI
KHAN KI-11.8AR 1:121<v LINE 'OXCLAAJid CalICVtelAM
132KV LINE II
LOOP IN
-#);
a 14J 74 ;0/7/PO
/A
'77—*
C) IA114) de-674 °S.- 4/-1
1'
/4-J LINE ISO /31-44 St✓/ irAryc„,t.ci

(Mc ISO
P0 21%.% ifh°
132KV CB
LINE CT
Dy. Manager Design GS A Iv
NTDC, Wapda House Lahore.
132KV BUSDAR II
Asa IS O
ASO ,{ISO
ISO 132KV BUSBAR I
w PT-I
132KV CB
132KV CB
PjC1.
6QVA P-CT
64:1VA
NTDC
NCI P4!7 "-)' Ni- Z ..
NC 7
mpT
MP
) IP P S
8/ MC T irps
B7 HC T
I 20K V LA
reorcv LA
Tr 11/132 KV
ID/13 DIVA (1/132 KV
IDZYDnu Tr 1 0/13rniA
=IN IVKV LA
11KV CABLE. IeKV LA
1 1KV CABLE
P•-CI
ISVA P - CT
I:5VA
IIXV Ca.
I IK‘o BUS/AR I IK VC 1 IK VC.B
c=z1 III<VC
1 IX VE.B
GrweRA TOR 0.5H V
10HVA GENERATOR er.5m1.1
IONVA
T URBINE
B.SHW
TURBINE 115MV
SINGLE LINE DTA GRAM, 11-132K V,RANOLIA HYDRO POWER PROJECT, E-001
GOVT. OF :CHYBER PUKHTOCIN
KM/A
0/ -.74Y±-2065 E,?: 94
• • - • -- • • --• •
091921200
P.02
TRIED DEMON
No. RHPP-TRIED-2012002
Date: 14 Feb 2012
To: Ranolia Project Manager
Descon Engineering Ltd
Subject: TECHNICAL DATA OF HYDRAULIC GENERATOR

E&M Works Ranolia HPP
Dear Sir,
Please find the TECHNICAL DATA OF HYDRAULIC GENERATOR of Ranolia Hydro

Power Project for your review.
1. MAIN TECHNICAL DATA AND MODE

1.1 type SFW-J8500-10/260
1.2 rated power 8500kw
1.3 rated voltage 11000V
1.4 rated current 557.67A
1.5 rated speed 600r/min
1.6 runaway speed 1200r/min
1.7 rated frequency 50Hz
1.8 phases 3
1.9 connection
1.10 power factor 0.8(lag)
1.11 flywheel torque gd2 41 t•m2
1.12 insulation class F/F
1.13 rotating direction: clockwise (view from the end of generator)
1.14 cooling type: two way enclosed self-circular ventilation, air cooling
2. EXCITATION DATA (DESIGN VALUES)
2.1 no-load excitation current 225A
2.2 no-load excitation voltage 50V
2.3 full-load excitation current 405A
2.4 full-load excitation voltage 126.8V
2.5 excitation winding resistance (75°C) 0.26593w
3. GENERATOR DATA (DESIGN VALUES)
3.1 direct-axis synchronous reactance XD 0.9626
3.2 quadrature-axis synchronous reactance XQ 0.5363
3.3 direct-axis transient reactance X'D 0.2162
3.4 quadrature-axis transient reactance X'Q O. 7163
3.5 direct-axis sub-transient reactance X"D 0.1538
3.6 quadrature-axis sub-transient reactance X"Q 0.2642
3.7 sequence negative reactance X2 0.2013
ffi i 8
t t' ■ , ly.lf t...11` t., S 4760, Pakisimi
Descon-Tried Consortium LJAN i E i 337 266 T: 92 42 3:69 e3.4. 350 5134 F.192 42 3581 3581 1135
(km.: 0141; tit:14011X V'/ 'A arra (UM
TRIED DESCOA
3.8 zero phase-sequence reactance XO 0.0548

3.9 short-circuit ratio SCR
>0.75
3.10 leakage reactance of stator winding XE 0.0893
3.11 resistance of stator winding per phase (75°C) 0.02433w
4. TIME CONSTANT OF GENERATOR
4.1 time constant of rotor winding when stator windings are open-circuited. TDO': 5.6222s
4.2 time constant of ordinate-axis damping winding when stator
are open-circuited. TCO': 0.2674s windings and rotor windings
4.3 time constant of abscissa-axis damping winding when stator windings are open-circuited.
TQO': 0.0782s
4.4 time constant of ordinate-axis damping winding when rotor windings are short-circuited and
stator windings are open-circuited. TDO": 0.0514s
4.5 time constant of ordinate-axis damping winding when rotor windings and stator windings are
short-circuited. TD": 0.0350s
4.6 time constant of abscissa-axis damping winding when stator windings are short-circuited.
TQ": 0.0289s
4.7 time constant of stator winding when rotor windings are short-circuited. TA: 0.1275s
5. NO-LOAD CHARACTERISTICS
U/UN 0.5 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3
IB/IBO 0.474 0.763 0.869 1 1.201 1.559 2.12
6. EFFICIENCY CHARACTERISTICS
P/PN 0.5 0. 6 0.7 0.81.1 0.9 1.0
q(%) 96.3 96.6 96.7 96.9
97 96.95 97
7. THEROMODETECTING ELEMENTS OF STATOR
Six platinum resistance thermo detecting elements are located in the generator stator and 3
one's are placed in the slot bottoms and between the layers pespectively, the resistance value
of each element at 0°C is 100+0.5w.
8. BEARING DATA
8.1 pressure of cooling oil for bearing

0.15-0.2mpa
8.2 temperature of inlet oil for bearing --C.35°C
8.3 oil consumption of bearing
4m3/h
8.4 type of cooling oil I-tsa-46 ( equal to the sign turbine 2, which is belong to american esso
oil company)
8.5 max permissible temperature
65°C
9. AIR COOLER DATA
9.1 power
9.2 water consumption 270 kw
80m3/h
9.3 temperature of cooling water
20°C
9.4 pressure of cooling water
0.15-0.2mpa
f)i `tsrrHn,viquAl :T., 18 'on , Fo-,:;;sti Rnni,

Descon-Tried Consortium UAN 111 337 266 T:192 •2 3599 0034,3580 5134 F. + 92 42 3581 1005..3,581 1135
desconi{i"riek«)r) corn W wavf.ctkori coin
111111111MINEmagiiimaar
TRIED DESCON
11111
10. HEATER
10.1 rated voltage: ac 220v
10.2 power: 2000 w (2x 1000w)
10.3 number: 2
11. MAIN UNITS WEIGHT
11.1 stator of generator 25000kg
11.2 rotor of generator 28000kg
11.3 bed plate 10000kg
11.4 c.p450 bearing 2500kg
Best Regards
Liu Xiaoying
Project Manager of Ranolia HPP, TRIED
t z,,r 4, 18 ...I') ,
c, S4760. P:11, 0,11.1
Descon-Tried Consortium JAN. ;1 337 266 T. +92 42 3399 0034.3580 5134 F.492 42 3581 '305, 3561 1135
cull) W A l'o'W dt".CGIS,C(11)
t'1. 1 z
%• ■■ t 4
Appendix -B
Plotted Results of Load Flow

For Chapter-5
Study of Interconnection of 17 MW Ranolia Hydroelectric Power Plant
Peak Load Case September 2014 without Ranolia HPP
Normal Case
MANSEHRA
Exhibit 0.0
HAITIAN
MUZAFBAD
40 7 1 64 6 4 34
42 -3.1 1.9 16 8!"--
6 40 7 31 3 MIJZFRBO-33KV
MANSEHRA 36 JAGRAN
42 -10 4
BALAKOT -1.0 15 0
83 0 ,
MANSHR-N
1 2 1(
52 9 -52 6 24 2 -240 158 -15 7 29 1
-24 25 55 29 9 15 0,
-64 36 48 130
132 7 10 9 54p'
-9 7 1375
52 9 -52 5 131 7 -7 9
-10 2 HARPUR
24 2.5 2313 2
7>
253 7 -253 7 FERT-FAC
ABBOTABO
-7.3 62 124
.4Q 01 -01 01 223
) JO 134 00 -00 -1 2 72
-470 HARIPURO 134 4
-12 3
30 23 2
—)/ -01 10 48 62
133 9
-9 1 29 1 -28 7 20 1 20 0 22
46 13 8 -16 9
AYUB MC 16 3 -7 2
134 0
HAVELIAN -11 7 6 TARNAWAN
8 5r-- la
es 1'- 43iT
42 9 424 256 -25 6 42 2 418 23 9
11 0 108 -180 -236 -101 102 -117
179 -153 15.2 -23 6 231 -122 107 -26
BURHAN-2
133 8 MURREE
-9 9 1338 136 0
-11.4 -12 1
41 8 -41 6
-2 5 NAIMOLI 23 96
41 8 18 -22 7
-41 6 570 -56 2 51 2 -50 4
-2 5 15 5 -14 4
21 25 7 26.5 1 -29 6 30 1
()GNI 133 9
BATAL -11 9
21 4 -21 4 13 7 66
3;4;).
85 -88 41
134 3
177 -12 3
95 134 4 4 ISLMBD-4.1 MINHASA
-8.5 21 0 11 4 -11.4 111
134 0 132 9
-07 -9 2 417 43 -5.8 56
133 9 133 7
-10 2 -13 9
134 2
-13 6
Duber-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
MANSEHRA Exhibit 0.1
HArRAN
MUZAFBAO
33 8
64 -64 64 34 ar...„.
5.2
31 -31 1.9 16
33 8 < ._,
MUZ.FP.B0-33KV
MANSEHRA 31 3 36 J AGRAN
52 -10 7
BAUkKOT 10 <
155443p
.:
MANSHR-N
40
52 2 -52 0 24 1
1 -23 9 157
2/ 56 -15 6 -29 2
-64 36 300 150
.4 a -129
1327 108 541
-10 1
52 2 -52 0 33 7 131 7 137 5
21 2.2 -10 6 HARIPUR -83
ALAI-KHR 2496
ABBOTABD FERT-FAC
3
-01 01 215
)4;4;1
3> -00 -12
-4 7
-458 HARIPURO 134 4
-126
22.6
133 9
-9 4 28 0
-14 3
-27 6 19 0 -18 9 21 5
AYUB M C 13 3 -164 158 7.0
134 0
HAVELIAN -12 0 6 2 TARNAVVAN
18
-1992 200 4 -1285 42 1 .41 6 24 8 85
-24 7 40 8 -40 4 22 4
107 105 -17.7 -22 2 -10 5
175 -14 8 106 11 9
14 6 -23 1
225 -119 104 -2 4
133 8 MURREE
40 9
-102 133 6
-11 7
.20
1 .73,
136 0
-12 4
z
-407
4
20 NATIACU ) -2 3 96
40 9 1 31
- 40 7 55 8 18 23 3 03
24 -550 500 -49 3
20 -25 4 26 0 -29 1 155 140
29 6
OGI-11 33 9
B1A3T7A L -122
21 4 -21 4 13 7 -13 7
85 -8 8 41 -5 5
134 4
00 -12 6
134 4 Q4
-09 ISLMBD-U MINHASA
134 0 132 9 199 114 - 11 411
-9 5 •
-9 1 -41 2 4 3 -5 6 56
133 9
-105 133 7
-14 2
134 2
-13 8
Khan-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out Exhibit 0.2
MANSEHRA
HAITIAN
MUZAFEAD
32 8 -04 84 341,,
53 3 1 19 16 8•7-
MUZFRI6D-33KV
00 32 8 131 3 36 JAGRAN
MANSEHRA -10 8
53 BALAKOT 10 15 0
MANSHR-N < 48 03 0102 '(
52 2 -51 9 24 1 -239 157 -156 -29 2 30 0 15 On
-2 1 22 56 -64 35 48 -12 9
132 7 108 5
-10 1 137 5
52 2 -51 33 7 131 7 -8 3
-10 6 HARIPUR
-21 22 21
ALAI-KHR -249 3 FERT-FAC
ABBOTABD
112
01 21 4
0 -00 -12 70
196 8 134 4
- )1-122
00 460 458 HARIPURO -12 6
4
33 9
-9 5
22 5
27 8
)1-7.1° ::›
-27 5 188 -18 7 21 4
-0
-14 2 13 3 16 4
KHANKHAR AYUB M C 157 70
134 0
72 0 0 168 HAVELIAN -12 0 T RNAWAN
6
0 OL .0, 3 85 18 4.
DBR-KHVVR 85
41 2
72 0 420 -41 5 24 7 24 8 40 8
-71 5 402 222 -22 0 -10 6 10 7 -119
-20 0 106 104 -17 6 174 -14 7
198 14 5 -23 0 224 -11 9
BURHAN-2
137 7 104 -2 4
167 133 8 MURREE
-10 3 133 6 136 0
-11 8 -12 4
408 2 17 9
-40 6
24 NATIAGU -° 96
19
130 3.1
40 8 406 55 7 18 .23 4
39 -5-4 9 49 9 492
-2 4 1.9 -25 3 155 -14 0
26.0 -29 1 29 5
133 9
OGHI -12 2
BATAL
196 8 201 5 21 4 -214 137 )14
-1371137,
92 198 85 -88 41 -55 67 ' 134 4
77 00 -12 5
38 6 MINHASA
34 8 14 0 1344 1 2 .- ISLMEID-IJ
43 -8 9 19 8 114 -56
134 0 32 9 •
-9 1 -9 6 -41 1 43 -56 561P.-
"
133 9 133 7
-10 5 -14 2
134 2
-13 9
Allai to Mansehra 220 kV Single Circuit Out
MANSEHRA
Exhibit 0.3
54 HATT1AN
54 33 9 MUZAFBAD
z -8 4
-6 3 6 4 34
a
co 33 9 -3 1 1 9 18
5,
-63 MANSEHRA 130 9 MUZFRBD-33KV
38
-to a JAGRAN
ALLAIn0 BALAKOT -1 0 %
MANSHR-N 93 00 150
( -
321 6
315 7 518 -
519 241
7
-240 157
-15 6 29 2
-47 19 30 15 0'
32 1 -3 1 14 6
126
51 9 -101
21 -51 6 137 5
31 3
ALA/-KHR R 21 -10 6
247 9 HARIPUR -34
1 -247 9
-04 184 ABBOTABD FERT-FAC
200 6 00 27 01 -01 01 213

200 6
174 00 -00 -1 2 8 2
o 453
liARIPURO 34 2
0086 -12.6
29 4
34
KHANKHVVR -2711184
-183 213
72 0 15 2 -13 3
335 -8 2
HAVELIAN -120
-,25 5 D3R-K1-11A/R 62 TARNAWAN
54 0
54 3
113 -85
137 3 -39 7 21 7
102 171 -21 5 -10 8 -12 0
169
24 9 -12 6 111 -28
133 2 MURREE
-11 7 35 8
0 0 17 -124
130 50 NAT1AGU 96
53
36 55 1
49 3 1 8 -23 8
3.4 0 27 7 30 8 -15 1
31 3
00111 33 4
BATAL -12 2
-8 5 21 4 -214 13
El 5 -137 137
41 P. 12 7
55
36 4 38 6 134 1
86 122 337 -12 6
-8 9
47
12 C.- 151/400-U MINHASA
133 3 32 2 192 114
-9 0 -9 5 -114 11
-429 43 -56 56
133 3
-10 5 334
142
33 9
-13 9
Mansehra-N to Mansehra 132 kV Single Circuit Out
Exhibit 0.4
MANSEHRA
HA-71'0,N
MUZAF6AO
-94 64 34 8,
I-3 I 19 16
31 I 31 0 MUZFRB0-33KV
36 JAGRAN
MANSEriRA 411
BALAKOT -1 0 150
83 00
MANSHR-N a 40 -1 2 ' (
24 1 -24 0 157 -15 6 29 2 300 15 0,,
46 -55 27 -3 9 -13 9 11.8 5 9R--/
132 4
-104 137 5
907 131 5
-900 33 7 -10 9 HARIPUR
-4 3 5
ALA1-KHR FERT-FAC
ABBOTABO
1 Cl 21 1
0 273
1, 13 a -1 2 71
134 4
-47
-80 7° 32 2
225
-31 9
22 3
1-4/11RIPURO
)1 -10 10 486
-12 6
133 5
-9 7 27 3 -27 0 183 -18 2 21 1
14 3 134 -165 858 -7
KHANKHVVR AYU8 M C 1 33 9
72 0
)I -,0 30 168,
85
HAVEL1AN -120
<2
4
TARNAWAN
46 0 85
-454 28 6 28 5 39 9 -39 5 21 6
-11 3 -214 -108 109 -120
113 -85 11.3 18 5 183 -14 9 14 7 -23 1 22 6 -11 9 104 -2 4
37 3 MURREE
62 133 7 133 6 1360
-10 3 -11 a -12 4
44 9
-2 1
X46
NAT1AGL1
00
.4_23 17
96
31
44 9 -446 55 1 -543 493 -486
18 -23 7 co
-2 1 18 -25 4 55 -14 0
26 1 29 2 29 6
133 8
OGHI -12 2 00
SATAL
21 4 -21 4 137 -13 137 1-12 7
85 -58 4 1 .5 134 3
-12 6
00
M1NHASA
1344 <12+ 151.M8D-U
45 -a8 193 114 -11 4 :11
134 0
-9 0 -41.2 43 -5 6 T-6-17."
133 8 133 7
-10 5 -14.2
134 2
-13 9
Peak Load Case September 2014 with Ranolia HPP
Normal Case
HATTIAN
MUZAFBAD
02 40 7
64 64 34
42
6
314-31 19 16 61
'"
00 40 7 MUZFREI0-33KV
MANSEHRA 31 3 36
42 -10 4 JAGRAN
BALAKOT -1 0
ALLAI220 83 00
MANSHR-N
4 0 -1 2 " '5 1P
541 3
169 2 52 9
-167 5 -52 6I 24 1
-2 4 -23 9 157
25 56 -156 -29 2
-6 4 36 300 150n
-4 8 -12 9
132 7 108 541Y
-9.7
52 9 -52 137 5
21.0 337 131 7
24 25 -10 2 HAR1PUR 9
3R
ALAI-KHR 253 7 -253 7
3 FERT-FAC
-73 63 12.4 ABBOTABD
)1 -30 0 27 -01 01 223

217 3
-217 3 13d2- 0. -1 2 -7 2
176
38
00 474 -470 HARIPURO 134 4 cc
),11111-23 0 23.2 ) 44> -12.3
29 4 33 9
-0.1 -9 1 29 1
28 7 20 1
KHANKHWR -147 -20 0 22 3
AYUB M C 13 8 169
72.0 16 3 -7 2
134 0
132 5
OR
133 0 -61 0
DER-KHWR
42 9
-)4014. HAVEUAN
18 On
-11.7
62 TARNAWAN
61 4 130 -42.4 25 6 e5 23
-25 5 42 2
-11 0 108 -18 0 -41 8 23 9
17 9 -15 3 -23 6 -10 1 102 -11 7
152 -23 6
133 8 23 -122 107 -26
MURREE
-9 9 133 6 136 0
41 8 -11 4 -12 1
-41 6
83 25
21 0 NATIAGU 23 96
138 6
95 418
-416 57 0 56 2 51 2 18 22 7
-2 5 -504
RANOLIA-PP 21 -25 7 26 5 i -29 6 155 144
30 1
85
73 84
OGHI 33 9
BATAL -11 9 00
21 4 -214 137 -5 67
-137 137> )1-12 7
85 -08 41
77 134 3
36 3 00 -12 3
56 85 34 4 47
01 -8 5 -12 ISLMI3O-U MINHASA
06 06 32 9 21 0 11 4
134 0 • -11 4 11
-8 7 -9 2
.417 43 -5 6 5 6
15
138 0 130
86 133 9
-10 2 133 7
-139
134 2
-13 6
Ranolia-HPP to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
HATT1AN
40 MUZAFBAO
66 4 4 34
43
0 31 1 9 16
03 40 1
C/) 311 MUZFRBO-13KV
MANSEHRA 36 JAG RAN
43 -10 4
BALAKOT 715—t
150
MANSHR-N
14 .;i(
27 5 4P
52 8 -52 6 24 1
24 -239 157
25 56 -15 6 -29 2
-64 35 30 0 15 On
-48 -12 9
132 7 108 5 40'-'
-9 7
52 8 52 6 33 7 131 7 137 5
24 25 21 -10.2 -8 0
F1ARIPUR
ABBOTABO FERT-FAC
•
-01 01 22 2
)1--13109 273 -1.2 72
00 473 -46 9 134 4
HARIPURO
.41779 8t-22 9 231
-12 4
33 9 11 d2
-9 1 29 0
-28 6 20 0 -19 9 22 2
146
AYUB M C 13 7 -16 9
161 72
0 0 16 134 0
HAVEUAN 7 <144, TARNAVVAN
-13185 18
215 5 217 0 -1451 42 8
147 0 -42 4 25 5 85
-100 25 5 42 1 -41 7 23 7
195 101 11.0 108 180
-0 2 178 15 2 -235 -102 10211 7
137 3 15 1 23 6
RANOLJA-HPP 83 23 1 12 2 10 6 -2 6
33 8 MURREE
-9 9 133 6
41 7 -11 5 -1132620
25
41 7
415
21 NATIAGU 4-2° 3
17 9r,
0 96 P-
136
415 56 9 18 -22 8 co
25 -56 1 51 0 -50 3
21 25 7 26 4 -29 5 55 -14 4
30 1
OGHI 33 9
BATAL -11 9
21 4 -21 4 13 7
85 -88 41
7
4 16371> -12 7
134 3
-12.4
34.4 "7 4j 00 '(
55 -8 5 12 ISLMBD-4J MINHASA
134 0 32 9 20 9 11 4 -11 4
-6 7 -9 2
417 43 -5 6 a6 V"--
13
387 18 3 133 9
13 8 -10 2 133 7
-13 9
134 2
-13 6
Ranolia-HPP to Duber-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out
HATT1AN
MUZAFBAD
40 3
6 4 34 612„
42
31 [-3 :
64-6 1.9 16 8kP.
40 3 MUZFRBD-33KV
MANSEHRA 31 3 38 0 JAG RAN
42 •10 4 -1 0 $---•
BALAKOT
3 00 150
MANSHR-N 71P
40 -1 2 "
52 8 -52 6 24 1
23 9 157
-2 4 25 56 -15 6 -26 2
-64 36 300 150,
48 -12 9
132 7 108 544-'
-9 7
52 8 52 33 7, 131.7 137 5
2.4 2 -102 HARIPUR -79
ALAI-KHR
ABBOTABD FERT-FAC
-0 1 01 22 2
216 2 -216 2 )17307074 12 -7 2
43 474
129 83 -46 9 HARIPURO 34 4
23 )174
1
E 4{;> -12 4
133 9
-0 1 -9 1 29 0
23 7 20 0 -19 9 22 2
KliANKHWR 146
AYUB M C 138 -169
72 0 162 7.2
)43043 1340
.7R DE1R-KriVvR HAVELIAN 7 62 TARNAVVAN
55
199 3 200 5 -128 42 9 23
130 0 130 424 256 85
75 -25 5 42 1 -41 7 23 8
154 63 -110 108 -18 0
06 06 178 -15 3 -23 5 10 1 10 2 -11 7
137 3 15 1 236
RANOLIA-HPP 81 23 1 -12 2 107 -2 6
133 MURREE
41 7
-9 9 133 6
-11 5
136 0
-12 2
z
-41 5
25 50 NATIAGLI )1÷3
138 6
128 41 7
41S 56 9 -56 1 51 1 4.1 22 7
-2 5 -50 3
RANOL1A-PP 21 -25 7 265 -29 6 55 144
-17 0 170 8 30 1
85 85
54 21 -10 1.7 1 7 OGI-11 133 9
21 4
BATAL -11 9 1 00
-21 4 137 -137 137 )'-1:
85 -88 41 -55 6 7 17-
77 1343
135 1 -8 5 00 , -12 4
85 85 134 4
55 -8 5 -1 2 .- ISLMBD-U MINI-LASA
10 17 17
134 0 32 9 21 0 114 -11 4 11 4,,
-9 2 •
-97 417 43 -5 6 56 1"--
136 6 106 133 9
61 133 7
-102 -13 9
134 2
-136
Khan-Khwar to Allai-Khwar 132 kV Single Circuit Out Exhibit 1.3
MANSEHRA
HATT1AN
MULAFBAD
54 34
19 16
MUZFRBD-33Kv
3 :3
I 3:13 36 JAGPAN
MANSE HRA -10 5
I0
BALAKOT 150
83 00
MANSHR-N -1 2
52 7 -52 5 24 1 -23 9 157 -15 6 29 2 300 15 40
23 .
24 56 -64 36 48 129 10 8
132 7
-9 8 137 5
52 7 131 7
-52 5 33 7 -10 3 HAR1PUR -80
-2 3 24
ALAI-KHR -252 7 FERT-FAC
ABB0TABO
12 1
01 22 I
0 -1 2 72
27
1343>
213 1 -213 1 134 4
-46 7 HARIPURO -12 4
122 333 00
-229 230
)1 "
42
133 9
-9 2 28 8 -28 5 198 -19 7 22 1
-0 2
146 13 7 -16 8 162 72
KHANKHINR AYUB M C
72 0 HAVELIAN 1-11.8
34 0 <1.4 TARNAwAN
0 OL 08R-KilvvR )1 TI° IS
42 7 85
72 0 -42 3 25 4 -25 4 41 9 -41 5 23 5
71 5 130 -23 3 -10 2 10 3 11 7
109 108 179 17.8 152
-20 0 19 8 40 150 -23 5 23 0 -12 1 10 6 -2 5
BURHAN-2
137 7 MURREE
RANOLIA-1-IPP 186 133 8 133 6 136 0
-10 0 -11.5 -122
-200 2 201 5 41 6 17
-41 3
128 20 8 25 NATIAGL1 )1 -20 03 96 c--1
386 41 6
A
5
18 22 8
159 -41 3 56 7 -55 9 50 9 -50 2
-2 5 21 -25 7 155 14 3
26 4 -29 5 30 0
RANOLIA-PP
-213 1 217 2 -85 85 85 133 9
12 2 139 -06 13 13 0041 -12 0 00
BATAL
21 4 -214 137 -137
7It57
137 . — -12 7
85 -08 41 -55 134 4
-124
00
134 5 -85 85 85 134 4
-8 6
44. 12 1A ISLMBD-U
20 a 114 -11 4
MINHASA
54 -06 13 13 134 0 32 9
-88 -9 2 416 43 -5 6 56
11 5 133 9 133 7
137 2 17 7 -10 2 -14 0
132
134 2
-13 6
Allai to Mansehra 220 kV Single Circuit Out
HAITIAN
W 40 2
-7 7
6 4 11-6 4
31 -]1
64
MLZAFBAD
19
03 40 2 30 MUZFRBD-33ICV
MANSEHRA 35 JAGRAN
-7 7 -105
ELALAKOT 10
15 0
ALLAI220 00
MANSHR-N
-1 2 's
338 3 -331 8 52 4 -52 1 24 1
1 7.1 -24 0 157 -15 6
16 5 40 41 3 9 29 2 300 15 Or,
-47 19 -3 0 147 127 6 4It'
132 1
-9 8 137 5
52 4 -52 33 7, 131 3
10 1
e2 40 -10 3 HARIPUR
4
OR
ALAI-KHR 251 3 -251 3
ABBOTABD FERT-FAC
19 7
)1 .30 0 27 3N -01 01 22 0
0 -0.0
217 3
176
-217 3
38
49
-43 00 46 4 46
-460
13 4*W.-
HARIPURO 134 1
-124
-1 2 5
24
—)! -0100 86
1 4 2
29 4 133 2
42 -9 1 28 4 -28 1 194 -19 3 22 0
KHANNHIAIR 165 15.6 -18 8
AYUB MC to 2 85
72 0 133.6
e 8R HAVEUAN -11-7 6 2 TARNAINAN
DBR-KHVVP. ), 12 es
.3
2
23
-132 5 133 0 -410 42 2 -41 8 24 9 85
61 4 130 • 24 9 41 4 -40 9 23 0
-103 131 -72 -12 3 12 1 19 3 227 -105 106 -118
60 143 92 -17 6 175 26 0
37 3 25 5 -12 9 11 4 -2 9
RANOIILHPP 116 133 2 MURREE
-9 9 133 2 35 8
-11 5 -12 2
41 5
-85 412
83 -4 0 NAT1AGU -0
230 19›
7
36
138 6 3
41 5
13 8 412 562 1 -23 2
40 -55 4 50 3 496
36 -27 4 55 -15 5
RANOUA-PP 28 1 -31.2 31 8
-85 85 85
-7 3 84 01 33 4
06 06 OGHI
BATAL -11 9
21 4 -21 4 137 -13 7 6137
7 > '-12 6
8.5 -8 8 41 -5 5
134 1
00 -12 4
135 3 -8 5 85 85 133 7 4 MINHASA
99 ISLMBD-U
01 -05 20 2 11 4
06 06 133 2 132 2 • -11 4 11
-67 -9 2 434 43 -5 6 56
1S
380 173 133 3 133 3
12 9 -10 2 -13 9
133.9
-13 6
Mansehra-N to Mansehra 132 kV Single Circuit Out Exhibit 1.5
MANSE/RA
HAITIAN
MUZAFBAD
41 8 -64 64 34 et.
.
42 3.1 15-33510 1.9 16
MUZFRI30-33KV
36 JAGRAN
co 41 8 MANSEHRA -10 8
42 BALAKOT 1.0
83 0 0 ,
ALLAI220 MANSHR-N 40 -12 "
69 2 -157 5 91 7 -91 0 24 1 -24 0 157 -15 6 29 2 30 0 5 9R3
150
-47 58 46 -5 4 27 -3 8 -13 9 118
132 4
-10 1 137 5
131 5 -8 3
37 7 -10 6 HARIPUR
10 21
251 4 -2514 FERT-FAC
ALAI-KHR ABBOTABD
32 -72 61 < 3-1-a' 1 01 21 8
), -30
00 27
134
0 -1 2 -7 3
217 3
65 134 4 cc
-217 3 43 33 32 9 HARIPURO -12.4
176 38 00 86
229 227
)L11 42
133 5
94 -9 4 284 -28 0 194 -192 218
-00 14 7 13 8 -16 9 163 -73
KHANKFIWR AYU19 M C 133 9
72 0 00 168D HAVELIAN -11 7 62 TARNAWAN
DE1R-KHWR — )1 -1 3 85 18
5 P°
48 8 -462 294 -29 3 413
132 5 -810 614 130 -409 22 9 -227 -104 105 -11 8
11 6 11.6 -18 8 18 7 154 152 -23 7
14 3 23.2 12 2 106 -2 6
133 7 MURREE
133 6 135 9
-9 9 -11 5 -12 2
83
45 7
-2 2
-45 5
20
31
NAT1AGLI -)1_0 2 17
96 cc
-
138 6 45 7 -23 1
95 -45 5 56 2 -55 4 50 4 496
22 5.5 -14 4
20 -25 8 265 -296 30 1
RANOLJA-PP
85 3313
.3 84 01 06 06 OGHI -12.0
BATAL
21 4 -214 137 )14
-13 7 13 7
85 -88 41 -5 5 114 3
-12 4
77 00
--I ( — ISLMBD-U MINHASA
753 85 134 4 -1 2
-8 4 20 3 11 4 -11 4 11
56 01 06 06 134 0 132 9
-8 6 -9 1 -41 7 43 -5 6 5 6 V-
15 133 8 133 6
138 0 13 0 -10 2 -13 9
86 134 2
-13 6
Results for Short Circuit Analysis
ForChapter-6
Maximum 3-Phase and 1-Phase Short Circuit Currents Exhibit 2.0
MANSEHRA
HAITIAN
MUZAFEA1)
MUZFPABD
th JAGRAN
UI MANSEHRA BALAKOT
O
ALLAI220 MANSHR-N if.
HARI P UR
FERT-FAC
ALAI-KHR ABBOTABO
13639 1, -73 0 (3PH) HARIPURO

11602 9, -67 8 (LG)
9579 3, -75 2 (3PH)

9450 9, -71 8 (LG) AYUB M C
KHANKHWR
HAVELIAN TARNAWAN
DBR-KHWR -{›
BURHAN-2
MURREE
NATIAGLI
OGHI
BATAL
MINHASA
7377 8. -77 1 (3PH) ISLM80-U
9803 0, -78 1 (3PH) 4859 0. -71 5 (LG) 14553 1 -70 1 (3PH)
8907 5, -72 0 (LG) 13226 5, -68 1 (LG)
SC-Tabular-without-Ranolia.txt
PSSeE ASCC SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS

MON, JuL 16 2012 12:21
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA-HPP - SEPTEMBER 2014
MAXIMUM SHORT CIRCUIT LEVELS WITHOUT RANOLIA HPP
AT BUS 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] AREA
15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00]*** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 vC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) Z+:/0.021909/83.494, 8.76870
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) z+:/10.604/83.494, 8.76870
X
THREE PHASE FAULT X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN (I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 1462.5 -79.36 1462.5 -79.36 1462.5 160.64 1462.5 40.64 23.04 82.58 7.675
139 [ALLA1220 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 1462.5 -79.36 1462.5 -79.36 1462.5 160.64 1462.5 40.64 23.04 82.58 7.675
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0 166.74 4100.0 46.74 22.28 82.47 7.569
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0 166.74 4100.0 46.74 22.28 82.47 7.569
1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 2557.6 -64.90 2557.6 -64.90 2557.6 175.10 2557.6 55.10 5.23 90.00 9999.999
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I -k)(Rms) AMP
13639.1 -73.01 13639.1 -73.01 13639.1 166.99 13639.1 46.99
AT BUS 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00
vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) 2+:/0.031114/85.257, 12.05251
THREE PHASE FAULT X

X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /III/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE
1 AMP/OHM 2088.2 -82.05 2088.2 -82.05 2088.2 157.95 2088.2 37.95
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 168.59 2898.0 48.59 23.04 82.58 7.675
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 168.59 2898.0 48.59 23.04 82.58 7.675
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1728.0 -79.70 1728.0 -79.70 1728.0 160.30 1728.0 40.30 8.36 90.00 9999.999
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP
9579.3 -75.21 9579.3 -75.21 9579.3 164.79 9579.3 44.79
AT BUS 1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
Page 1
(kv L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/5.968/80.686, 6.09750
THREE PHASE FAULT

X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+, AN (I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 8585.7 -77.85 8585.7 -77.85 8585.7 162.15 8585.7 42.15 14.52 90.00 9999.999
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1314.5 -66.59 1314.5 -66.59 1314.5 173.41 1314.5 53.41 12.49 79.19 5.238
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1314.5 -66.59 1314.5 -66.59 1314.5 173.41 1314.5 53.41 12.49 79.19 5.238
1370 [AYUB M.0 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1292.1 -52.16 1292.1 -52.16 1292.1 -172.16 1292.1 67.84 10.01 64.76 2.121
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1138.2 -54.51 1138.2 -54.51 1138.2 -174.51 1138.2 65.49 3.60 64.80 2.125
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1138.2 -54.51 1138.2 -54.51 1138.2 -174.51 1138.2 65.49 3.60 64.80 2.125
1385 [OGHI 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I"k)(Rms) AMP 14553.1 -70.05 14553.1 -70.05 14553.1 169.95 14553.1 49.95
AT BUS 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00 vA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 vc:/0.000/0.00
X THREE PHASE FAULT

X FROM X AREA CKT 1/Z /I+/ AN(i+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 5796.6 -77.33 5796.6 -77.33 5796.6 162.67 5796.6 42.67 23.23 90.00 9999.999
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1251.5 -77.29 1251.5 -77.29 1251.5 162.71 1251.5 42.71 15.92 82.08 7.187
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 12 AMP/OHM 2757.4 -80.21 2757.4 -80.21 2757.4 159.79 2757.4 39.79 4.32 82.09 7.196
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP 9803.0 -78.14 9803.0 -78.14 9803.0 161.86 9803.0 41.86
AT BUS 1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
Page 2
f
SC-Tabular -Without-Ranolia.txt
x
THREE PHASE FAULT
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z x
/I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN (IA) /Is/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE
1 AMP/OHM 2440.9 -83.26 2440.9 -83.26 2440.9 156.74 2440.9 36.74
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1765.4 -76.03 1765.4 -76.03 1765.4 163.97 1765.4
1393 [ALAI-KHR 43.97 12.14 82.09 7.197
132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 4583.3 -76.08 4583.3 -76.08 4583.3 163.92 4583.3 43.92 4.32 82.09
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 7.196
8775.7 -78.06 8775.7 -78.06 8775.7 161.94 8775.7 41.94
AT BUS 1391 [DBR-KHWR132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (Pu)
z+:/0.067121/87.229, 20.65981
X
THREE PHASE FAULT
X FROM x
X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /1B/ AN(IB)
MACHINE /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP x/R
1 AMP/OHM
2479.6 -77.97 2479.6 -77.97 2479.6 162.03 2479.6 42.03
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM
2611.8 -77.14 2611.8 -77.14 2611.8 162.86 2611.8 42.86 12.14 82.09 7.197
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM
2286.9 -76.21 2286.9 -76.21 2286.9 163.79 2286.9 43.79 15.92 82.08 7.187
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP
7377.8 -77.13 7377.8 -77.13 7377.8 162.87 7377.8 42.87
PSSoE ASCC SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS

MON, JUL 16 2012 12:21
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR POWER DISPERSAL OF
FATIMA ENERGY LIMITED
AT BUS 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] AREA
15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) v+:/103.851/8.45 V-:/41.003/-164.33 V0:/63.384/-176.22 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/148.127/-119.
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) 11 VC:/165.861/135.19
z+:/0.021909/83.494, 8.76870 Z-
:/0.021904/83.499, 8.77539 Z0:/0.033860/71.601, 3.00629
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/10.604/83.494, 8.76870 z
-:/10.602/83.499, 8.77539 Z0:/16.388/71
.601, 3.00629
x
LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT
X FROM x
X AREA CKT 1/Z /i+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(I0) /310/
139 [ALLA/220 220.00] AN(I0) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
15 1 AMP/OHM 404.5 -79.12 418.6 -72.22 991.3 -64.27 2973.8
139 [ALLAI220 -64.27 51.58 -98.54 6.657
220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 404.5 -79.12 418.6 -72.22 991.3 -64.27 2973.8 -64.27 51.58 -98.54
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 6.657
15 1 AMP/OHM 1173.4 -66.85 1159.2 -68.59 602.1 -73.01 1806.3
Page 3 -73.01 22.28 -100.51 5.388
217 [1580-NEW 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 1173.4 -66.85 1159.2 -68.59 602.1 -73.01 1806.3 -73.01 22.28 -100.51 5.388
1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 737.4 -58.56 721.0 -60.23 689.8 -69.02 2069.4 -69.02 29.77 -109.19 2.873
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I 'k)(RMS) AMP 3867.6 -67.83 3867.6 -67.83 3867.6 -67.83 11602.9 -67.83
X FROM X AREA CKT 1/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /Is/ AN(IB) /1c/ AN(IC) /zA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
139 [ALLA1220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 1804.1 -69.41 558.1 -53.82 631.0 -58.77 19.01 54.80 1.418
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 1804.1 -69.41 558.1 -53.82 631.0 -58.77 19.01 54.80 1:418
217 [I5BD-NEw 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2932.5 -68.80 540.3 119.49 598.9 116.42 34.59 77.82 4.633
217 [1580-NEW 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 2932.5 -68.80 540.3 119.49 598.9 116.42 34.59 77.82 4.633
1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 2141.4 -62.48 133.1 -162.70 121.6 176.96 4.67 90.78 73.026
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I -k)(Rms) AMP 11602.9 -67.83 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS Is: 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/96.945/8.36 v-:/47.394/-166.50 V0:/49.922/-176.52 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/138.083/-112.55 vc:/152.784/129.18
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) z+:/0.031114/85.257, 12.05251 z-:/0.031083/85.264, 12.06972 20:/0.032741/75.249, 3.79802
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/15.059/85.257, 12.05251 Z-:/15.044/85.264, 12.06972 ZO:/15.847/75.249, 3.79802
LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT X

X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(IO) /310/ AN(IO) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 686.2 -82.90 688.9 -76.50 1654.1 -86.52 4962.3 -86.52
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 967.8 -66.11 946.5 -68.92 621.9 -62.08 1865.8 -62.08 66.97 -104.67 3.820
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 967.8 -66.11 946.5 -68.92 621.9 -62.08 1865.8 -62.08 66.97 -104.67 3.820
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 553.9 -77.79 574.2 -75.47 387.6 -38.64 1162.9 -38.64 41.23 -146.54 0.661
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP 3150.3 -71.77 3150.3 -71.77 3150.3 -71.77 9450.9 -71.77
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /1B/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 3021.7 -83.42 910.4 -92.01 1041.5 -90.70

138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2533.6 -66.17 299.8 104.76 386.2 100.97 20.56 71.63 3.011
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 2533.6 -66.17 299.8 104.76 386.2 100.97 20.56 71.63 3.011
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1453.2 -67.16 378.1 60.77 325.1 60.58 8.36 90.00 9999.999
Page 4
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I"k)(Rms) AMP Sc-Tab ular- with out-Ranolia.txt
9450.9 -71.77 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
(kv L-G) v+:/60.559/9.77 v-
:/26.309/-167.37 V0:/34.308/-172.43 vA:/0.000/0.00 v8:/88.834/-114.71 VC:/93.372/134.03
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (Pu)
Z+:/0.034249/80.686, 6.09750 z-:/0.034248/80.691, 6.10066 Z0:/0.044661/75.634, 3.90445
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (oHm) Z+:/5.968/80.686, 6.09750 Z-
:/5.967/80.691, 6.10066 ZO:/7.782/75.634, 3.90445
X LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /i+/ AN(i+) /1-/ AN (I-) /IC)/ AN(10) /310/ AN (10) /z+/ AN (Z+) APP x/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2589.9 -76.50 2605.6 -75.58 3242.3 -69.88 9727.0 -69.88 20.05 -108.56 2.978
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 400.4 -64.05 397.3 -64.85 107.3 -74.05 321.8 -74.05 280.32 -97.09 8.039
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 400.4 -64.05 397.3 -64.85 352.8 -80.35 1058.5 -80.35 85.21 -90.79 72.133
1370 [AYUB M.0 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 393.6 -49.62 390.5 -50.42 149.2 -69.67 447.7 -69.67 201.95 -102.09 4.667
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 351.8 -51.59 341.9 -52.95 299.8 -49.23 899.5 -49.23 104.81 -124.69 1.445
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 351.8 -51.59 341.9 -52.95 299.8 -49.23 899.5 -49.23 104.81 -124.69 1.445
1385 [OGHI 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I"k)(Rms) AMP 4408.8 -68.06 4408.8 -68.06 4408.8 -68.06 13226.5 -68.06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 8426.1 -73.67 691.8 -44.55 741.5 -49.26 12.66 89.44 102.816
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 903.6 -65.58 289.0 119.64 298.3 118.47 15.65 75.46 3.857
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1141.1 -69.31 113.4 176.73 113.9 171.14 12.40 79.19 5.236
1370 [AYUB M.0 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 926.0 -53.12 252.4 142.08 260.7 140.49 12.93 63.73 2.026
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 993.2 -51.35 40.9 117.46 59.8 103.62 5.52 69.81 2.719
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 993.2 -51.35 40.9 117.46 59.8 103.62 5.52 69.81 2.719
1385 [OGHI 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 13226.5 -68.06 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] AREA 1 **- FAULTED BUS IS: 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY '**
(kv L-G) v+:/60.365/7.16 v-:/26.126/-164.03 v0:/34.778/-179.44
vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/83.959/-118.00 VC:/97.771/131.60
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (Pu) z+:/0.050516/87.958, 28.05057 Z-:/0.050500/87.962, 28.09543 ZO:/0.067225/72.547, 3.18065
Page 5
sc-Tabular-without-Ranolia.txt
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R
(OHM) Z+:/8.802/87.958, 28.05057 Z-:/8.799/87.962, 28.09543 20:/11.713/72.547, 3.18065
x LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(i+) /1-/ AN (I-) /10/ AN(I0) /310/ m(10) /z+/ AN(z+) APP X/R
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 1783.7 -70.45 1745.7 -71.57 2374.6 -84.93 7123.9 -84.93 17.62 -100.46 5.415
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 380.7 -68.38 379.7 -72.34 213.6 -16.26 640.9 -16.26 41.64 -92.28 25.097
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 809.4 -77.08 843.8 -72.69 641.9 -38.38 1925.6 -38.38 32.56 -90.59 97.117
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 2969.2 -71.99 2969.2 -71.99 2969.2 -71.99 8907.5 -71.99
X FROM X AREA CKT 1/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /Is/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 5862.0 -76.60 830.9 -117.67 742.0 -117.56 23.23 90.00 9999.999
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 902.0 -59.30 288.9 73.05 327.4 77.57 48.95 51.96 1.278
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 2201.5 -64.86 549.7 56.71 434.5 51.10 14.72 37.26 0.761
(kv L-G) v+:/66.368/5.34 V-:/20.552/-156.31 V0:/47.306/177.47 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/91.464/-129.68 VC:/113.267/137.41
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) Z+:/0.056323/87.711, 25.01207 z-:/0.056311/87.712, 25.03032 20:/0.129613/61.495, 1.84139
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/9.814/87.711, 25.01208 z-:/9.812/87.712, 25.03032 z0:/22.584/61.495, 1.84139
X FROM X AREA CKT I/z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /If)/ AN(IO) /310/ AN(IO) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 539.0 -78.31 589.8 -66.31 1357.5 -92.53 4072.5 -92.53
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 444.0 -56.90 419.3 -63.85 147.6 -73.29 442.8 -73.29 25.75 -62.27 1.902
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1134.5 -60.08 1086.3 -62.85 1011.3 -22.41 3033.9 -22.41 14.58 -98.59 6.619
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cURRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP 2094.7 -64.02 2094.7 -64.02 2094.7 -64.02 6284.1 -64.02
X FROM X AREA CKT 1/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 2440.9 -83.26 745.5 -107.35 964.2 -104.63
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1006.0 -62.17 247.8 132.46 332.6 121.76 53.94 61.26 1.824
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 3072.6 -49.47 656.8 53.62 773.3 57.22 16.25 36.34 0.736
Page 6
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I''k)(Rm5) AMP 5c-Tabular-without-Ranolia.txt
6284.1 -64.02 0.0 0.00 0.0
0.00
AT BUS 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] AREA

1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) v+:/67.458/8.53
v-:/18.940/-164.31 v0:/48.723/-174.24 vA:/0.000/0.00
vB:/100.486/-126.39 vc:/108.407/142.34
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (Pu) Z+:/0.067121/87.229, 20.65981 Z-:/0.067112/87.230,
20.66594 20:/0.172648/77.294, 4.43525
(OHM) Z+:/11.695/87.229, 20.65981 z-
:/11.694/87.230, 20.66594 20:/30.082/77.294, 4.43525
x
FROM X AREA CKT I/Z X
/I+1 AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(I0) /310/ AN(I0) /z+/ AN(Z+)
MACHINE APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 560.0 -65.79 543.5 -74.31 1398.2 -84.24 4194.5
1392 [KHANKHWR -84.24
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 562.9 -75.99 575.4 -70.30 152.3 -63.34 457.0 -63.34 19.29 -79.74 5.523
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 501.4 -72.96 501.7 -69.96 304.5 -1.71 913.4 -1.71
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 15.94 -106.38 3.402
1619.7 -71.54 1619.7 -71.54 1619.7 -71.54 4859.0 -71.54
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IS) /IC/ AN(IC)
MACHINE /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 2479.6 -77.97 946.5 -92.26 804.7 -94.20
1392 [KHANKHWR 132 00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1287.3 -71.96 468.7 102.40 369.7 104.55
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 46.61 77.00 4.333
1 1 AMP/OHM 1144.3 -57.01 507.1 74.21 469.8 71.15
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) 54.83 59.94 1.728
AMP 4859.0 -71.54 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
Page 7
Maximum 3-Phase and 1-Phase Short Circuit Currents Exhibit 2.1
MANSEHRA HAITIAN MUZAFBAD
ISBD-NEW
MUZFRABD JAGRAN
MANSEHRA BALAKOT -ED
AL1A1220 MANSHR-N
HARIPUR
FERT-FAC
ABBOTABD
AU1J-KHR
13683 7, -73 0 (3PH) HARIPURO

11620 0, -67 9 (LG)
9656 5 -75 3 (3PH)

9493 7. -71 8 (LG) AYUB M C
KHANKHVVR TARNAWAN
HAVEUAN
DE1R-K1-(WR
BURHAN-2
MURREE
NATIAGLI
857 1, -77 4 (3PH)

49222. -71 8 (LG)
RANOUA-PP
OGI-11
BATAL
MINHASA
ISLMBD-U
0060 4 -78 2 (3PH) 14568 6. -70 1 (3PH)

9028 1. -72 0 (LG) 13232 3. -68 1 (LG)
8427 9, -81 6 (3PH)

152 4 -76 9 (3PH) 20823 8. -81 6 (LG)
4675 9, -40 2 (LG)
SC-Tabular-With-Ranolia.txt
PSS!T ASCC SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS

MON, JUL 16 2012 12:16
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA-HPP - SEPTEMBER 2014
MAXIMUM SHORT CIRCUIT LEVELS WITH RANOLIA HPP
AT BUS 138 [MANSEHRA
220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
X
THREE PHASE FAULT
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z X
/I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN (IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC)
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
AMP/OHM 1485.1 -79.43 1485.1 -79.43 1485.1 160.57 1485.1
139 [ALLAI220 40.57 23.04 82.58 7.675
220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 1485.1 -79.43 1485.1 -79.43 1485.1 160.57 1485.1 40.57
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 23.04 82.58 7.675
15 1 AMP/OHM 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0
217 [ISBD-NEW 166.74 4100.0 46.74 22.28 82.47
220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 4100.0 7.569
-73.26 4100.0 -73.26 4100.0
1379 [MANSHR-N 166.74 4100.0 46.74 22.28 82.47
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 2557.6 7.569
-64.90 2557.6 -64.90 2557.6 175.10 2557.6 55.10
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 5.23 90.00 9999.999
13683.7 -73.04 13683.7 -73.04 13683.7 166.96 13683.7 46.96
AT BUS 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] ***
(kv L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
vA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
x
X THREE PHASE FAULT
FROM X AREA CKT I/Z x
/I+/ AN (I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC)
MACHINE /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 2088.2 -82.05 2088.2 -82.05 2088.2 157.95 2088.2 37.95
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2898.0 -71.41
2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 168.59 2898.0 48.59 23.04 82.58 7.675
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 2898.0 -71.41
1393 [ALAI-kHR 2898.0 -71.41 2898.0 168.59 2898.0 48.59 23.04 82.58 7.675
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1806.0 -79.94 1806.0 -79.94 1806.0 160.06 1806.0 40.06 8.36 90.00 9999.999
Page 1
SC-Tabular-with-Ranolia.txt
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I''k)(RMS) AMP 9656.5 -75.29 9656.5 -75.29 9656.5 164.71 9656.5 44.71
(kV L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
X THREE PHASE FAULT X

X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 8601.6 -77.89 8601.6 -77.89 8601.6 162.11 8601.6 42.11 14.52 90.00 9999.999
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1314.6 -66.60 1314.6 -66.60 1314.6 173.40 1314.6 53.40 12.49 79.19 5.238
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1314.6 -66.60 1314.6 -66.60 1314.6 173.40 1314.6 53.40 12.49 79.19 5.238
1370 [AYUB M.0 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1292.3 -52.16 1292.3 -52.16 1292.3 -172.16 1292.3 67.84 10.01 64.76 2.121
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1138.3 -54.51 1138.3 -54.51 1138.3 -174.51 1138.3 65.49 3.60 64.80 2.125
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1138.3 -54.51 1138.3 -54.51 1138.3 -174.51 1138.3 65.49 3.60 64.80 2.125
1385 [OGHI 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 14568.6 -70.08 14568.6 -70.08 14568.6 169.92 14568.6 49.92
AT BUS 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
X THREE PHASE FAULT X

X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 2479.6 -77.97 2479.6 -77.97 2479.6 162.03 2479.6 42.03
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 2653.1 -77.15 2653.1 -77.15 2653.1 162.85 2653.1 42.85 12.14 82.09 7.197
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 2524.6 -77.04 2524.6 -77.04 2524.6 162.96 2524.6 42.96 4.45 82.08 7.187
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I''k)(RMS) AMP 7657.1 -77.38 7657.1 -77.38 7657.1 162.62 7657.1 42.62
Page 2
AT BUS 1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] AREA
1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AwAY ***
(kv L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 Vc:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU)
z+:/0.054915/87.679, 24.67141
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/9
.568/87.679, 24.67141
X
X FROM THREE PHASE FAULT X
X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB)
MACHINE /lc/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(z+) APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 2440.9 -83.26 2440.9 -83.26 2440.9 156.74 2440.9 36.74
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1880.0 -76.43 1880.0 -76.43 1880.0 163.57
1393 [ALAI-KHR 1880.0 43.57 12.14 82.09 7.197
132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 4687.3 -76.22 4687.3 -76.22 4687.3 163.78 4687.3 43.78
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 4.32 82.09 7.196
8995.0 -78.17 8995.0 -78.17 8995.0 161.83 8995.0 41.83
AT BUS 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] AREA
1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) V+:/0.000/0.00 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/0.000/0.00 VC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (Pu)
z+:/0.049191/87.934, 27.72576
X FROM THREE PHASE FAULT

X AREA CKT I/Z X
/I+1 AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) //8/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC)
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
AMP/OHM 5796.6 -77.33 5796.6 -77.33 5796.6 162.67
1392 [KHANKHWR 5796.6 42.67 23.23 90.00 9999.999
132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 2853.6 -80.23 2853.6 -80.23 2853.6 159.77 2853.6 39.77
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 1 4.32 82.09 7.196
AMP/OHM 1412.6 -78.01 1412.6 -78.01 1412.6 161.99
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I -k)(Rms) AMP 1412.6 41.99 11.87 82.08 7.187
10060.4 -78.25 10060.4 -78.25 10060.4 161.75 10060.4 41.75
AT BUS 1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] AREA

1 *** FAULTED BUS IS:
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00 vA:/0.000/0.00 vs:/0.000/0.00 vc:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU)
Z+:/0.069144/86.705, 17.36915
Page 3
x THREE PHASE FAULT X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
1391 [OBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 3645.1 -76.75 3645.1 -76.75 3645.1 163.25 3645.1 43.25 4.45 82.08 7.187
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 3112.9 -76.17 3112.9 -76.17 3112.9 163.83 3112.9 43.83 11.87 82.08 7.187
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] 1 1 AMP/OHM 199.0 -84.24 199.0 -84.24 199.0 155.77 199.0 35.77 1.21 90.00 9999.999
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] 1 2 AMP/OHM 199.0 -84.24 199.0 -84.24 199.0 155.77 199.0 35.77 1.21 90.00 9999.999
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP 7152.4 -76.91 7152.4 -76.91 7152.4 163.09 7152.4 43.09
AT BUS 13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/0.000/0.00 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/0.000/0.00 vC:/0.000/0.00
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z,:/0.387/89.751, 230.11177
X THREE PHASE FAULT

X FROM X AREA CKT I/z /I+/ AN(I+) /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 4036.7 -84.23 4036.7 -84.23 4036.7 155.77 4036.7 35.77
MACHINE 2 AMP/OHM 4038.6 -84.24 4038.6 -84.24 4038.6 155.76 4038.6 35.76
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I'e k)(RMS) AMP 18427.9 -81.59 18427.9 -81.59 18427.9 158.41 18427.9 38.41
PSS®E ASCC SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS MON, JUL 16 2012 12:16

INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR POWER DISPERSAL OF
FATIMA ENERGY LIMITED
AT BUS 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kV L-G) V+:/103.904/8.42 v-:/40.943/-164.35 V0:/63.496/-176.24 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/148.240/-119.19 VC:/165.945/135.21
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) Z+:/0.021834/83.498, 8.77404 Z-:/0.021840/83.502, 8.77984 Z0:/0.033870/71.620, 3.00967
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/10.568/83.498, 8.77404 2-:/10.571/83.502, 8.77984 20:/16.393/71.620, 3.00967
Page 4
SC-Tabular-With-Ranolia.txt
X
FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/
139 [ALLAI220 AN(I0) /310/ AN(IO)
220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM /z+/ AN(Z+) APP x/R
409.7 -79.43 423.6 -72.21 992.4 -64.31 2977.3
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] -64.31 51.63 -98.51 6.683
15 2 AMP/OHM 409.7 -79.43 423.6 -72.21 992.4 -64.31 2977.3
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] -64.31 51.63 -98.51 6.683
15 1 AMP/OHM 1172.2 -66.77 1157.5 -68.62 603.2 -73.02 1809.5
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] -73.02 22.28 -100.51 5.388
15 2 AMP/OHM 1172.2 -66.77 1157.5 -68.62 603.2 -73.02 1809.5
1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] -73.02 22.28 -100.51 5.388
1 1 AMP/OHM 736.6 -58.48 720.0 -60.26 691.0 -69.03 2073.0
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP -69.03 29.77 -109.19 2.873
3873.3 -67.86 3873.3 -67.86 3873.3 -67.86 11620.0 -67.86
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z

/IA/ AN(IA) /1B/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC)
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP x/R
15 1 AMP/OHM
1815.1 -69.53 552.5 -53.53 630.0 -58.70
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 2 19.03 54.96 1.426
AMP/OHM
1815.1 -69.53 552.5 -53.53 630.0 -58.70
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 19.03 54.96 1.426
15 1 AMP/OHM
2930.5 -68.79 536.0 119.67 598.3 116.46
217 [ISBD-NEW 220.00] 34.62 77.80 4.626
15 2 AMP/OHM
2930.5 -68.79 536.0 119.67 598.3 116.46
1379 [MANSHR-N 132.00] 34.62 77.80 4.626
1 1 AMP/OHM
2140.7 -62.47 133.3 -161.24 121.5 177.44
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I''k)(RMS) AMP 4.67 90.79 72.632
11620.0 -67.86 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 139 [ALLAI220 220.00] AREA 15 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 139 [ALLAI220
220.00] ***
(kv L-G) V+:/97.078/8.30 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
V-:/47.272/-166.54 v0:/50.177/-176.56 VA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/138.279/-112.75 vc:/152.999/129.24
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) z+:/0.030855/85.279, 12.10911 Z
-:/0.030864/85.282, 12.11752
20:/0.032760/75.266, 3.80254
(OHM) z+:/14.934/85.279, 12.10911 z-
:/14.938/85.282, 12.11752 z0:/15.856/75.266, 3.80254
X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /IC,/ AN(IO) /310/ AN(10)
MACHINE /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP x/R
1 AMP/OHM 684.2 -82.78 687.1 -76.54 1662.6 -86.56 4987.7 -86.56
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 965.4 -65.97 944.1 -68.96 625.1 -62.12 1875.3 -62.12
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 66.97 -104.67 3.820
15 2 AMP/OHM 965.4 -65.97 944.1 -68.96 625.1 -62.12 1875.3 -62.12
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 66.97 -104.67 3.820
1 1 AMP/OHM 575.9 -78.51 595.1 -75.47 387.6 -38.64 1162.7 -38.64
41.47 -146.52 0.661
Page 5
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /Is/ AN(IB) /lc/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 3026.4 -83.44 922.6 -92.01 1050.1 -90.77
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2532.0 -66.14 291.6 104.75 382.9 101.02 20.54 71.57 3.000
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 2 AMP/OHM 2532.0 -66.14 291.6 104.75 382.9 101.02 20.54 71.57 3.000
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1494.1 -67.71 401.2 63.22 338.7 61.71 8.36 90.00 9999.999
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I-k)(Rms) AMP 9493.7 -71.83 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
(kv L-G) v+:/60.565/9.75 v-:/26.293/-167.39 v0:/34.330/-172.45 vA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/88.846/-114.75 VC:/93.382/134.02
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (Pu) z+:/0.034206/80.696, 6.10402 z-:/0.034212/80.699, 6.10617 Z0:/0.044669/75.645, 3.90738
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (OHM) z+:/5.960/80.696, 6.10402 Z-:/5.961/80.699, 6.10617 20:/7.783/75.645, 3.90738
X LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(I0) /310/ AN(IO) /z+/ AN(Z+) APP x/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 2592.8 -76.57 2608.5 -75.61 3243.5 -69.92 9730.6 -69.92 20.06 -108.54 2.982
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 400.4 -64.00 397.1 -64.87 107.3 -74.07 322.0 -74.07 280.32 -97.09 8.039
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 400.4 -64.00 397.1 -64.87 353.1 -80.37 1059.2 -80.37 85.21 -90.79 72.157
1370 [AYUB M.0 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 393.6 -49.57 390.3 -50.44 149.3 -69.70 448.0 -69.70 201.95 -102.09 4.667
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 351.8 -51.54 341.7 -52.98 300.0 -49.25 900.0 -49.25 104.81 -124.69 1.445
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 351.8 -51.54 341.7 -52.98 300.0 -49.25 900.0 -49.25 104.81 -124.69 1.445
1385 [0GHI 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CuRRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP 4410.8 -68.09 4410.8 -68.09 4410.8 -68.09 13232.3 -68.09
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
138 [MANSEHRA 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 8433.1 -73.72 689.0 -44.36 742.2 -49.25 12.66 89.44 102.583
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 903.4 -65.57 288.4 119.71 298.5 118.46 15.66 75.46 3.854
Page 6
1360 [ABBOTABD 132.00] 1 2 sc-Tabular-with-Ranolia.txt
AMP/OHM 1141.1 -69.31 113.5 177.15 114.0 171.13
1370 [AYUB M.0 12.40 79.19 5.236
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 925.9 -53.12 251.9 142.18 260.9 140.49 12.93 63.72
1380 [MANSEHRA 132.00] 2.026
1 1 AMP/OHM 993.1 -51.34 40.2 117.72 59.8 103.68
1380 [MANSEHRA 5.52 69.80 2.719
132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 993.1 -51.34 40.2 117.72 59.8 103.68 5.52 69.80
1385 [oGHI 132.00] 2.719
1 1 AMP/OHM 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RmS) AMP 0.00 0.00 0.000
13232.3 -68.09 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS: 1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/67.839/8.39 v-:/18.582/-164.51 v0:/49.452/-174.27 vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/101.391/-126.94 vC:/109.080/142.62
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) z+:/0.064607/87.292, 21.14385 z-:/0.065000/87.283, 21.07488 Z0:/0.172981/77.527, 4.52085
Z-:/11.326/87.283, 21.07488 Z0:/30.140/77.527, 4.52085
X FROM X
X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(I0) /310/
MACHINE AN(IO) /z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 550.8 -65.00 533.2 -74.51 1419.1 -84.27 4257.2 -84.27
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 559.9 -75.57 572.7 -70.48 154.5 -63.30 463.6 -63.30 19.26 -80.81
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 6.182
1 1 AMP/OHM 535.8 -74.82 535.7 -70.49 301.6 -1.63 904.7 -1.63 121.10 -170.75 0.163
INITIAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(I"k)(RMS) AMP
1640.7 -71.79 1640.7 -71.79 1640.7 -71.79 4922.2 -71.79
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /1B/ AN(IB) /IC/ AN(IC) /ZA/ AN(ZA)
MACHINE APP X/R
1 AMP/OHM 2479.6 -77.97 984.2 -91.93 829.2 -94.05
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1284.0 -71.84 458.4 102.36 370.2 104.69 47.19 76.92
1394 [RAN0LIA-HPP, 132.00] 4.303
1 1 AMP/OHM 1203.1 -58.94 551.7 76.24 493.2 72.00
4922.2 -71.79 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
(kv L-G) v+:/66.621/5.24 v-:/20.320/-156.31 V0:/47.781/177.50 VA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/92.058/-130.07 VC:/113.703/137.58
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (PU) Z+:/0.054915/87.679, 24.67141 z-:/0.055111/87.686, 24.74564
Z0:/0.129588/61.493, 1.84120
Page 7
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R SC-Tabular-with-Ranolia. txt
(OHM) z+:/9.568/87.679, 24.67141 z-:/9.603/87.686 , 24.74564 ZO:/22.579/61.493, 1.84120
X LINE TO GROUND (Lo) FAULT
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /10/ AN(IO) /310/ AN(IO) /z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 532.1 -77.87 583.1 -66.31 1371.1 -92.50 4113.4 -92.50
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 461.3 -57.83 438.3 -63.81 148.9 -73.22 446.8 -73.22 25.78 -63.09 1.970
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1143.6 -60.07 1095.5 -62.83 1021.8 -22.40 3065.5 -22.40 14.59 -98.50 6.691
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 2440.9 -83.26 769.0 -106.70 979.9 -104.46
1391 [DBR-KHWR 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 1044.2 -62.51 268.3 130.46 344.5 121.29 52.79 61.71 1.858
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 3099.8 -49.44 663.0 53.42 779.6 57.08 16.27 36.31 0.735
AT BUS 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] AREA 1 **' FAULTED BUS IS: 1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] *** 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
(kv L-G) v+:/60.651/7.05 v-:/25.890/-164.10 V0:/35.294/-179.43 vA:/0.000/0.00 VB:/84.477/-118.53 VC:/98.220/131.85
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (Pu) z+:/0.049191/87.934, 27.72576 Z-:/0.049376/87.941, 27.81656 z0:/0.067310/72.611, 3.19311
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (OHM) Z+:/8.571/87.934, 27.72576 Z-:/8.603/87.941, 27.81656 z0:/11.728/72.611, 3.19311
X LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I+/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /IC)/ AN(IO) /310/ AN(IO) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
139 [ALLAI220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 1766.3 -70.08 1730.0 -71.64 2409.9 -84.92 7229.6 -84.92 17.62 -100.46 5.415
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 827.6 -77.02 861.7 -72.70 651.4 -38.34 1954.3 -38.34 32.54 -90.61 93.322
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 419.7 -70.48 417.7 -72.33 211.7 -15.98 635.1 -15.98 62.38 -135.95 0.968
139 [ALLA1220 220.00] 15 1 AMP/OHM 5862.9 -76.59 882.5 -115.22 779.6 -116.16 23.23 90.00 9999.999
Page 8
1392 [KHANKHWR 132.00] sC-Tabul a r-with-Ranolia.txt
12 AMP/OHM 2245.6 -64.88 561.0 57.19
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 445.3 51.72
1 1 AMP/OHM 14.66 37.37 0.764
973.2 -61.08 334.7 77.56 356.7 79.03
9028.1 -72.04 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00]
AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS:
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] ***
(kv L-G) v+:/71.989/0.83 0 LEVELS AWAY ***
V-:/18.940/-133.56 v0:/60.280/167.85 vA:/0.000/0.00 vs:/93.270/-144.16
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R (Pu) vc:/137.206/137.52
z+:/0.069144/86.705, 17.36915 z-:/0 .069742/86.677, 17.22188
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, X/R Z0:/0 .221966/28.087, 0.53366
(OHM) z+:/12.048/86.705, 17.36915 Z- :/12.152/86.677, 17.22188
20 :/38.675/28.087, 0.53366
X
X FROM LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT
X AREA CKT I/Z /I+1 X
AN(I+) //-/ AN(I-)
1391 [DBR-KHWR AN(I0) /310/ AN(I0)
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM /z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
820.5 -38.54 800.7 -40.74 1093.0 -49.24
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 3279.1 -49.24 31.74 -91.57
1 1 AMP/OHM 674.0 36.465
-40.44 683.1 -39.27
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 508.7 -20.57 1526.2 -20.57
11.000] 1 1 AMP/OHM 13.44 -99.54 5.948
34.0 -58.97 37.6 -43.56
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
11.000] 12 AMP/OHM 0.00 0.00 0.000
34.0 -58.97 37.6 -43.56
ZffITZAL SYM. S.C. CURRENT(/"k)(RMS) AMP 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
1558.6 -40.23 1558.6 -40.23 1558.6 -40.23 4675.9 -40.23
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /IA/ AN(IA) /IB/ AN(IB)
1391 [DBR-KHWR /IC/ ANCIC)
132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM /ZA/ AN(ZA) APP X/R
2704.7 -43.50 355.6 -73.81 291.7 -74.17
1393 [ALAI-KHR 132.00] 17.65 4.99
1 1 AMP/OHM 1844.9 0.087
-34.63 274.1 100.24
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 245.7 99.48
11.000] 1 1 AMP/OHM 36.79 28.05 0.533
70.9 -50.88 43.9 125.09 27.4 135.60
13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] 6.72 46.80
12 AMP/OHM 70.9 1.065
-50.88 43.9 125.09
INITIAL SYM. S.C. 27.4 135.60
CuRRENT(I''k)(RmS) AMP 6.72 46.80 1.065
4675.9 -40.23 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
AT BUS 13941 [RANOLIA-PP 11.000] AREA 1 *** FAULTED BUS IS:

13941 [RANOLIA-PF, 11.000] ***0
(kV L-G) v+:/4.445/8.19 LEVELS AWAY ***
v-:/2.999/-171.91 v0:/1.446/-171.63
vA:/0.000/0.00 vB:/6.810/-100.43
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R (Pu) Vc:/6.794/116.77
z+:/0.319828/89.751, 230.11179 Z-:/
0 .357064/89.722, 206.19359
THEVENIN IMPEDANCE, x/R 20 :/0.172197/90.000, 9999.999
(OHM) Z+:/0.387/89.751,
230.11177 z-:/0.432/89.722,
206.19359 20 :/0.208/90.000,
9999.999
Page 9
x LINE TO GROUND (LG) FAULT X
X FROM X AREA CKT I/Z /I,/ AN(I+) /I-/ AN(I-) /IC)/ AN(I0) /310/ AN(I0) /Z+/ AN(Z+) APP X/R
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 1504.9 -88.32 1308.2 -81.91 2317.5 -81.63 6952.4 -81.63
MACHINE 2 AMP/OHM 1505.6 -88.32 1308.8 -81.91 2318.6 -81.63 6955.7 -81.63
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 1 A1P/OHm 1983.5 -76.55 2162.2 -81.46 1152.6 -81.63 3457.9 -81.63 0.00 0.00 0.000
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 1983.5 -76.55 2162.2 -81.46 1152.6 -81.63 3457.9 -81.63 0.00 0.00 0.000
MACHINE 1 AMP/OHM 5123.5 -83.66 773.0 -86.87 1091.9 -68.27
MACHINE 2 AMP/OHM 5125.9 -83.66 773.2 -86.86 1092.6 -68.27
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 1 AMP/OHM 5293.6 -79.66 773.1 93.13 1092.3 111.73 224.49 89.44 101.732
1394 [RANOLIA-HPP 132.00] 1 2 AMP/OHM 5293.6 -79.66 773.1 93.13 1092.3 111.73 224.49 89.44 101.732
INITIAL SYM. S.C. cuRRENT(I"k)(Rms) AMP 20823.8 -81.63 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00
Page 10
INIERCONNECIION SLID)/ FOR AnNoLin HOP
PEAK LOAD SEPIEMBER 2014
5 IEMF NS COWEN 3-PHASE FAULT AT BANDLIA-HPP 132KV. CLEANED IN 5 CYCLES
rfivomincit5 .„
INIFFINATioloc T A LINE RINDLIA-HPP TO ALAI-KHWAR 1 32KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FITT: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Hanolia-Alai-Khwr.out
1, :"ll :( ' !:: : W.;, i f ..:': ' ) .- 0,1
.. --. ,
1-70 . 0 ,...) f).00 I C) II
nd
CONLu'S 17.10: UTINGL 2018r7nGRAN 132.00111-[ONGL 20CT0RBELA 500.00] d
x x -70.00 co
70.000 PU
,. :!YZ
'' ' J'J'r 1- i•rlt.:(1 ,%',)! 11,011 ti Y0.0
a
CHNLu'S 15.18: u-INGL 1392LIMINKHNI3 132.00117-CANGL NunABELn 500.007
e -o -70.00
70.000 w
ID
1—
CHNLN'3 UNGL 13THERANOLIA PP 11.000317 CI NGL 201:111ABELO 500.00J

70.000 -70.00
O
O
(SE CON D S)
0
0
(NJ
_J 2
CD
O
EU
J
rc
0
O
cr C)
O
O
0
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR FinNoLin IIPP
AMA-- PEAK 10AO SEPTEMBER 2014 In '
Smipispown
E LNrIOLOLI CS
3- PHASE FAULT AT RANOL1A-HPP 132KV. CLEARED IN 5 CYCLES
INILHNHIILINf Lr TRIP LINE RANOLID-HPP TO riLAI-KnkRR 132I\V SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: D:\PP1\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Ranolia-Alai-Khwr.out
•tql H K111;1.• 1 1! CI
1j-2000 0 I ()
CIINLn 5: [VOLT CU
1391 COBR-15111,1R 132.001]
1.2000 x 0.0 I CO
CU
I;r1.41 4 11 • I Vi gi l -".'••,1•" I hHhh•,, ,•.HINii I :)(s. 1
CD
0.0
CHNLu 3: [VOLT 1393 cm_rii-KHA 132.0011
1.2000 e
0.01
=
J.1
CHNLt, I: [VOLT 139q1 ERnw.,

- LIn PP 11 . !00031
1.2000 C 0. 0
O
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 O
C,
O
-
O
O
O
O
O
O
co
O
0
0
r-
0
fC O
C)
LL-
LL ,L)
[SECONDS)
LIJ
O
a O
O
I-
O
O (C)
CL
O FFRUL T
II
(n LU
O
>:
CD
_
0
II
>- L.) C,
2.7 C,
CL C3
hi c-3
Ll
O CL Ln
lil
LE
O
O
C)
O
0
O
O
INTERCONNECTION SIUDY FOR RANOLIA HPP
PEAK LORD SEPTEMBER 201'1
Li)
5IIMENS !WU
IECHNO1061(5
3-PHASE FOUL l Hr RANOLIA-HPP 132KV. CLEARED IN 5 CYCLES
INiLRNAIION01. IRIP LiNE RRNOLIA-HET 70 ALRI-KhNHR 132KV SINGLE CiRCUIT
FILE: D:\PPIVianolia HPP\Flt-Ranolia-Alai-Khwr.out
CHNL=, 8: 50,, (1 F01-150 13T1 FRFINOLIII-HFP 132.00J:I

19.500 ,
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
0
N
O
0
0
0
(SECON DS)
0
0
0
En
FREQUENCY
0
0
O
O
O
O
01
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR nnNoLin HPP
APAA-- PERK LOOM SEPTEMBER 20Ig
SIEMENS VflfiCH
3-PHASE FAULT AT RANDLIA-HPP 132KV. CLEARED IN 5 CYCLES LB
1FLHNULKIEc
INTERNAIIONIX
IHIP I INF RANOLIA-APP TO OLA1-KONFIPI 132hV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILL: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\FIt-lianolia-Alai-Khwr.out
O
ry
ID
Iv
(.3
CT
11
1
CHNL* [MW FLOW kHAN-KHWRPLOI KHNR:1 __

300.00 _
-50.00
0
0
a
0
Li
O
O
U)
(AJ
MVRR FLO W KHRN- KHWR TO RL PI-KHW9
CC CD
CD
CD
CD
cr
0
I- 0
CD
MW FLOW KHRN- KHN A
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
:E
-n -D DE DK rn
- 2 -0
fr
.; r- (4 20
- Fri -M ]
2
CD 2: rn
jx F- rn
P-MECHANICAL OF RNIOLIA-HPP GENERATORS
!!! Hrl!!
f -7 70 Er1
▪ D7 LO DO CD
1-1 C Z. CD
1; -0 CD P3 -<
(4-7 F- CD
In 0) -M
CD 00 P-1= CD
I— :0
t; -0 3D 2
-u r- -o :o
• -o
in
IT -n
-- I CD
• 7%LO
.
1 D:
DO 2 77
.
7
Ca.) Z
17]
-o
- Lk.) r-
0) fl) FM
2:2
0) un CD
SPEED OF RANOLIA-HPP GENERATORS
▪ C7 C7
o -<
C DO C7
• CM r
c rn
Lo
0.0 2.0000 4.0000 6.0000 8.0000 10.000

1.0000 3.0000 5.0000 7.0000 9.0000
TUE, RUG 28 2012 17:02
TIME (SECONDS]
r_
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA - HPP
AAN^--- PERK LOUD SEPTEMBER 201'1
3-PHISE ilnuLr R1 RANOLIO-HPP 132KV. nuun IN 9 CYCLES
ArmNsrow,
V2Ma (RIP LINE RHNOLIR-HPP TO RLAI-KHINU I32KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\FIt-Ranolia-nlai-Khwr-stuck-breaker.out
; ;),:)1 I El (:) 1 ; I I f • : I f' 1 `,: I it Iti
1 -20,0e0 -7
70.1)0 (C,
CHNLII'S 17.18: [ANGL 2018[Y:16814N 132.00]1]-UINGL 20C1PRBELP 500.007
70.000 x• x -70.00 CO
cuI
_C 1 INLL t h. 18: f flN: I 1 ,00.1:01
CD
70.000 - ;0 D
CE
CHNILft'S 15, 18: DINGL 13921:KW1NKHWR 132.0011J-EANGL 20CUIRBELA 500.00]
70.000 e
-70.00 LIJ
CHNLI'3 ERNGL 13,1111crinNoLtn-Pr 11.000111EriNGL 201:1- 8h8ELA 500.001

70.000
- 70.00
I I 1
ANGL E J AG RRN
RO TORAN GLE KH RNKHWR
CO
:4-7i— cc
( SECON DS)
x,' lil
U CC
z O
a: Lu
PNGLERRNOL I R-HFP
0
cc cc O
CD cc Eft
O
ir LiJ
_J I 1J
CD C>
CD
C>
O
CC
O
q-,
O
O
cc
0
O rn
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
INIPHCONNECTION STUDY FOR miNoLin - HPP
PEAK LUAU SEPTEMBER 2014
SIEMENS PM/ 3-PRASE FAULT AT RANOLIA-FIPP 1 32KV. CLEARED IN 9 CYCLES
Tromotonirs
INIINNEIIGNOL
TRIP LINE RANOLIA-APP TO ALAI-KRWAR I32KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: 0:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Ranolia-Alai-Khwr-stuck-breaker.out
!Tht!! 4 I
4. E0C0 I
CHNLu 5: [VOLT 1301 CDBR -KHWR 132.00]]

1.2000 x -- ------- —x
0.0
I: I 12:1. 11 I
0.0
CE
CHM_ u 3: [VOLT 1303 rni 1 -KHR 132.0017
1.2000 .0 0.0
CHNLu 1: [VOLT 130'11 CA1hN0L10-pp 11.000]]

2000 ❑ 0
0.0 1
I 1 I I I I I I
0
(--• O
O
O
0
O
In
O
O
O
O
r-
LI
IL
In
(SECONDS)
tZ
O
O
0 O
as UI
0
IL O
O
IL O
IV
ac
(t:
O U
•/
O
(Al
O
O
O
O
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA - HPP
PERK LORD SEPTEMBER 2014
sammpowin
IECHNOLOCIES 3-PHASE FAULT AT RANOLIA-HPP 132KV. CLEARER IN 9 CYCLES
IN 1(11Nfil MU"
1R1P LINE RANOLIA-HPR TO ALAI-KHkAR 132KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: U:\PPI\Banolia HPP\FIt-Ranolia-Rlai-Khwr-stuck-breaker.out
\
CD
Pd
aD
Pd
CD
LL1
H-
Thl!',!Lt, 8: 50YINEFREO 13(11: crinNain FTT 1?200DDJ

T=1.000
I I I
0'
O
O
fLl
CD■
CJ
C3
O
O
0
O Lid
FREQUENCY
CJ
U
CJ
---------
O
O
O
O
O
O
I
-n
r-
rn
C_J -0
I rn 2:
27 --A
-0 CC 2 rn
7- F- P3
-- 20 23z
rnrn oz
3 2D rn
'03 =0 C= LO (-7
— CD
- 2D F7
~ A C U)
MVRR FLOW KHRN-KHWR TO RLRI-KHWF1 132KV s/c C
- = 2D =0
-0 -0z CD
-0 CD DJ -<
-n r- CD
II CD 2D CD
1 I I
I S
• MD -0 7D
O -,
1 I — I CD
- LO F-
p CE DJ
II 7.X 2D
\ 2) 21 <
-- C0 I
17- 1
(1)
- C7 IC
I I CO r- -0
rn -0
=7< CU
rn
0 Li ■
' cn
MW FLOW KHAN-KHWR TO PILRI-KHWR 132KV S/C 0
,C
(7 !:
Cf; P3 Pi
(D)
Q) (.91
EE cr
0
1 1
0.0 2.0000 14.0000 6.0000 8.0000 10.000
1.0000 3.0000 5.0000 7.0000 9.0000
TUE, RUG 28 2012 17:09
TIME (SECONDS)
F
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIR - HPP
PERK LORD SEPTEMBER 201L1
SIEMENS Pnwcn 3-PHASE FAULT AT RANOLIA-HPP 132KV. CLEARED IN 9 CYCLES
'minimums
lLNl IONS) TRIP LINE RANOLIA-HPP TO ALAI-KHWAR 13aV SINGLE
CIRCUIT
FILE: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Ranolia-Alai-Khwr-stuck-breaker.out
CI
(2)
( Si
CO
Cu
cr
LL1
CHNLft 21: EFTNR 1 39q1ChnNOLIA-PP H. 000]

0.20000
-0.0500 1
LID OD
It
0
a
LL1
0
I
ID
lii
z IL
Iii
ID
a
OU TPUT O F RANOL IR-H PF
_J
0
CC
Li-
0
I-
CD
0
---------
I
0
INTERCONNLCIION S1UDY FOR RANOLIO - HPP
PEAK LOAD SEPTEMBER 2014
5irmr N5 Miff 3- PHASE FAULT AT BANOLIA - HET 1321(V. CLEARED IN 9 CYCLES
INIERhimowq HIP LINE RANOLIA - NPA 10 ALAI - RANAH 132KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: D:\PPT\Ranolia W\FIL-Hanolia-Alai-Khwr-stuck - breaker.out

iU
ca
Cu
CO
cv
L.7
CT
LLJ
I—
1,1:NLn 23: [PHU. 17,:im[RnNal1) FP 11.000111

0 Ll 0.50000 1
1.0000
1.ea l
U)
Er
CD
CE U)
IJJ CD
LL1
0
O
P-ME CH RN I CRL O FFI RN OL I R-H P F
LtJ
O
.13
( SE C ON DS )
ti
cc CD
•—•
_J C3
CJ
CE
Ln
CC
0
Lit
Lu
El
CD
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA HPP
PERK LORD SEPTEMBER 2014 CNI
Lf
S IEMENS POWER 3- PHASE FAULT AT ALAI-KHWAR 132KV. CLEARED 5 CYCLES
Mrg= TRIP ALR1-KHWAR TO KHANKHWAR 132KV SINGLE CIRCUIF
FILE: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\Fli-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwrnout
' 1;i: '1 (:,( ::I 1 f1,4 1 (1 ht: i ' I 1 ;
100. 00 --- -
0 I
CHNLGS 17.10: 1:11NGI_ 2018[..1fIGRAN 132.0011D-C1INCL POCrF1RBEL1-1 500.00:1
100.00 -100.0 co
( 00 IL1-1 18(1 _ ,1 '01 FF11111111 ,) 00, 00 1 .
0O.0
CHNLII '5 15,18: 1-11N1;1_ 1392CKl1fINI(HkIR 132.00113-C1MM_ 201:14111BEI_11 b00.001
100.00 -----------
-100.0 UI
I :
H-
CHNLti 'S 13, 18: [11N151_ 13'1111 EP1NOL In PP 11.0003111 ClINCL 20C UMBEL fi 500.001
100.00
-100.0
ED
0
0
0
0
0
0
RO TOR RNGLE J RGRRN
0
0
C3
03
RNOL E KH RNKHWR
0
0
N
CD
ED
A __A 0
Ill 0
,/ • m .0
• EL
(SECOND S )
cc• . , 1--
c)•-.. N . ‘i
'3 • 1
CI 0
CD . ,/ I. 0
EV
LE
ENJ
EL LE)
RO TO R
Iii 0 Lu
• I I
cC
:A 0
0 0
X, J'
. CC
• I 0
t
• In
ii:
El
a ••— • L 0
C.)
•
r I
0
C3
GD -- -
- ------- '
LI1J
IN1LHCONNECTION SlUDY FOR BANOLIA HPP
kvv, PENK LOAD SEPTEMBER 2014
siult miLi 3-PHASE FAULT AT ALAI-KHWAR 13210. CLEARED 5 CYCLES
TECHNmi qr I
maRramoirfiL IRIP uni-kHNAR 10 M-1ANKHIWRR 132KV SINGLE CIRCUIT
FILE: 0:\FPI\Fla0011a HPP\Flt-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwr.out
•:1 4 '1 r`j
1.EUG.,1 T .0 CO
CHNLa 6: [VOLT 139 FFILLA1220 220.0013

1.2000 0.0 03
(-\.1
_1:1 ■
1A CILMJ Lf-ry 11.(j00 1
0
0 .0
CHIlLti 2: (- voLT 1399 Cl'inNOLln-HPP 132.0011
1.2000 0.0 LLJ
1 ; ;,
ChNLn DIDLT 13'13 can' 132.001]

1.2000 9 0 0.0
1 1 -7 I 1 I 1 I
:
:1
1i
:I
(SECONGS1
IJ
O
O
In
• ,4
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RANOLIA HPP
PERK LORD SEPTEMBER 201 'l
rawrn
SIEPIFNS
3-PHASE FAULT AT ALAI-KHWAR 132KV. CLEARED 5 CYCLES
rfrHNOlorIr s
IONfIL
TRiP ALAI-KHWAR TO RHANKHNAR 1321E SINGLE CIRCJIT
FILE: D:\FPI\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwr.out
I
O
CV
OD
CD
CE
LJ
F-
_ CHNLv e: 50Y11 4 CFPIE0 13 0 1 umNoLln H FN

51.000 32.00Ta
o
T11.000
C)
•—•
C>
0'
L)
(F)
CD
C)
I—)
LLI
Ul
EL LU
>—
ti1
LLJ a
CC O
LL 0
O
O
C)
0
1
O
INTERCONNECTION STUDY FOR rinNoLln HIT
PLAK LORD SEP [EMBER 2014 I_ 0
sirmiNspowi
3130q0I0M5 - -
3-PHASE Him HT NAI-KHWAR 132KV. CLEARED 5 CYCLES
ME144110N01 MINIM 10 KHANKHNAR 132hV SINGLE CIFiCUIT
FILE: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\FIt-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwr.out
C-X1
CO
RI
L.
)
cc
bJ
-ZD
C.HNLit II: - Ix[HW FLOW mrimuLin IiLRI MINR]

250.00 0.0
a
C>
C>
O O
O
CC
0 co
3 Lc)
O
>
IL Y
fU C>
r< O
C>
01
O
C>
CD
INTHCONNECTION STUDY FOR HRNOLIP HPP
PERK LOAM SEPTEMBER 2014 III
SIEMENS MUM_
'WINER 01I1S
3-PHASE PAULI AT ALAI-KHWAR 1 32KV. cLDIRED 5 CYCLES
MUMMA) IONAL TRIP ALAI-kHHHA TO KHANKHkAR 5INOLE CIRCUIT
FILE: A:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\FIt-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwr.oul
nj
CD
C\
CO
\I
C)
C)
U-
CHNL# 21: [PUNR 17(

P11EFFINOL10 FP 11.000J1=1
0.25000 9 0 0.0
71
J
I
0
IC)
C.>
O
b?
r-
In
I Ci
a
Cr
U)
LU n
cc
z
O
O O
a If) (11
CI
u. II I
Li O O >
O
a O
O
LL O
a O
O
C)
a_
0 0
(1:
rm
0
•
o".
INIERCONNECTION STUDY FOR RDNOLIII HPP

PEAK LORD SEPTEMBER 2014
SIEMENS POW 3-PHASE PAW: AT ALAI-KAWAA 132KV. CLEARED 5 CYCLES
urmflom-s
wiwmwq, TRIP AL(-11-1\HLIHR ro KRLINKHWAR 13,=_KV SINGLE CICICUIT
FILE: D:\PPI\Ranolia HPP\Flt-Alai-Khwr-Khankhwr.out
CV
1 L_
C■
Co
Li
ChNL8 23: [PHEC 13(?IlERflOLICI 11.000717

❑ ❑ 0.70000
CP
Cr) O
cC
Cl
I-
EZ
EC
Li
a
Ei cn
0
(SE C ON DS ;
0
a:
Er
2: 7
0
X
EL
0 a
7
CC
CC F-
LJ_
0
a_
0
(NJ
O
CJ
C-,
O
SHYDO
GOVERNMENT OF N. W.F.P. PESHAWAR
ADB TA No. 4425-PAK (TAR 34339-01)

Renewable Energy Development Project
RANOLIA HPP FEASIBILITY STUDY
1 ".."20,0 CHINA
NORTHERN N... •
AREAS
../
•••••■
...hi. , •
..
AFGHANISTAN AJK
lamabadt? •
Lahoreo c
(ir
I PUNJAB /
Ouella
4)
1.0•5'
PAKI§TAN / +INDIA
( 00°.
---/---.4\e. 4 _1
IRAN
IRAN,,, if
1 (..,
.-1
\i SINDH
i (..,
le l
Karachi
ARABIAN SEA
7
Volume 3: Environment Assessment
SHYDO
O
GOVERNMENT OF N. W.F.P. PESHAWAR
ADB TA No. 4425-PAK

(TAR 34339-01)
Integration Environment & Energy Ltd
In association with
ENTEC AG
ADB TA No. 4425-PAK

(TAR 34339-01)
Volume 1 of 4 Technical Report
Volume 2 of 4 Economic and Financial Analyses
Volume 3 of 4 Environment Assessment
Volume 4 of 4 Resettlement Plan

RANOLIA Feasibility Study: Environment Assessment
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
Objectives and Approach 1
Main environmental impacts 1
Environmental mitigation 2
Conclusions 2
I INTRODUCTION 3
A. Purpose and Scope of Environmental Report 3
II DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 5
A Type of and Category of the Project 5
B Government Approval Requirements 5
C Location and General Description 5
D. Construction Schedule 6
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 6
A. Provincial Context 6
B Physical Environment 6
C. Ecological Resources 7
1. Wildlife 7
2 Forest Resources 8
3 Fish Resources 9
D Socio-Economical and Cultural Environment 10
IV CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS 15
V SCREENING OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION 15
A. Positive Impacts 15
B Loss of Land and Houses 16
C Loss of Trees 17
D. Construction Impacts and Mitigation 17
1 Materials 17
2 Construction Activities 18
3. Road Access 18
4. Construction Site and Camp Impacts 18
E. Loss of Water to the River System 19
1. Human Impacts 19
2. Fish Impacts 19
F Specific Mitigation Measures 20
1 Compensation and Resettlement 20
2. River Water Flow 20
3. Fish Mitigation Measures 21
4 Compensation for Loss of Trees and Replanting Programme 22
5. Water Quality Monitoring Program 23
G Impacts and Mitigation of Transmission Lines 23
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN AND
INSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS 24
VII. CONCLUSION, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Mitigation 2

Table 2 Summary of Mitigation Costs 2
Table 3 Protected Areas in NWFP 6
Table 4: Estimated Size and Population of Villages in Ranolia Valley 10
Table 5: Schools in Ranolia Valley 11
Table 6: Shops in Ranolia Valley 13
Table 7: Relative Poverty Distribution in Villages 13
Table 8: Water Demand for Community Infrastructure in Winter 14
Table 9: Comparison of Impacts by Original and New Design of RKHP 15
Table 10 Comparative Analysis of CO2 Emission using Oil, Gas & Coal for
Generation 16
Table 11: Permanent Land Acquisition by Type of Land for Ranolia HPP 16
Table 12: Number of Affected Trees 17
Table 13: Estimated Cost of Land Acquisition and Resettlement 20
Table 14 Annual Budget for Fish Sampling 21
Table 15: Estimated Cost of Compensation for Affected Trees of Ranolia HPP 22
Table 16 Cost Estimates for Raising One Acre Tree Plantations 22
Table 17 Annual Budget for Quarterly Analysis of Drinking Water Quality 23
Table 18 Proposed Mitigation Costs 24
Table 19 Estimate for Environmental & Resettlement Specialist & Monitoring 25
Table 20 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 27
LIST OF MAPS
Map 1 Project Area: Ranolia Khwar 4
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX 1 List Of Organizations/Persons ContactedNisited i

ANNEX 2 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist iii
ANNEX 3 Terms of Reference for ESDC Staff and External Specialists vi
ANNEX 4 Photos of Ranolia Project Site x
Photos from
MR Marlene Richter
DR Derek Ratcliff
-v-
LIST OF ACRONYMS
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
Currency Unit Pak Rupee (Rs)
US$1.00 = Rs.60.00
ABBREVIATIONS
ADB Asian Development Bank

AEDB Alternative Energy Development Board
CEP Code of Environmental Practices
DFO Divisional Forest Officer
EA Environmental Assessment
ESDC Environmental and Social Development Cell
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESDC Environmental and Social Development Cell
FD Forest Department
GoP Government of Pakistan
GoNWFP Government of North Western Frontier Province
GTZ Deutsche Gesellshaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit
(German Agency for Technical Cooperation)
GWh Giga Watt hour
HHs House Holds
IEE Initial Environmental Examination
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature
NOx Oxides of Nitrogen
NWFP North Western Frontier Province
O&M Operation and Maintenance
Pak EPA Pakistan Environment Protection Agency
PHED Public Health Engineering Department
PMU Project Management Unit
RKHP Ranolia Khwar Hydropower Project
RoW Right of Way
SC Supervision Consultant
SHYDO Sarhad Hydel Development Organization
SOx Oxides of Sulfur
TA Technical Assistance
WAP DA Water and Power Development Authority
VVWF Worldwide Fund
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES
ac acre
ft Feet/Foot
ha hectare
km kilometre
m meter
m3 cubic meter
m2 square meter
s seconds
Note: In this report, "$" refers to US dollars and "Rs" refer to Pak Rupees.
-vi-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Objectives and Approach

The Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO) of North West Frontier
Province (NWFP) of Pakistan carried out an initial Feasibility Study of Ranolia Khwar
Hydropower Project (RKHP) with the assistance of the Pak- Swiss Small Hydel
Programme in the mid-1990s. SHYDO has been trying to obtain Provincial and
Federal Government approval and funding, but the project has not progressed
beyond feasibility because of non-availability of reliable funding.
The Government of Pakistan has requested loan funding from ADB for a number of
renewable energy projects. ADB is making loan preparations and a PPTA is being
conducted in cooperation with the provincial power cells in NWFP (SHYDO) and
Punjab and Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB) as Executing Agency.
The RKHP is one of the locations to be reviewed by the project team for the
preparation of the ensuing loan.
The project is a small (11.5 MW) run-of river hydropower scheme using water from
the Ranolia Khwar (river) to provide a gross head of 403 m. Under ADB guidelines
Ranolia is a Category B project, and, as such has been subjected to an Initial
Environmental Examination (IEE). The project also requires an IEE under the
Environmental Assessment requirements of the Government of Pakistan. A
resettlement plan was also undertaken as part of the TA.
The project consists of a weir intake, open power canal, siphon to transfer canal
water from left to right bank of the river, penstock, powerhouse, spillway and tail race.
Water is taken from the Ranolia Khwar (River) and delivered to the powerhouse on
the main Dubair Khwar (river) a few hundred metres downstream of the confluence of
the Ranolia and Dubair Khwars. The water delivery system is designed to provide a
maximum of 3.5 m3 /s to two turbines in the summer months when water flows are
high. In the winter months natural flows in the river reduce to about 1.0 m3/s and the
powerhouse would operate for four hours only to supply an evening peak
requirement. As a result of the project, in the winter months, between October and
April, the Ranolia Khwar will experience reduced water flow in the 5 kms of the river
below the proposed weir.
Main environmental impacts

The main potential environmental impacts of the project relate to:
• Construction activities along some steep and hilly slopes to make the power
canal, siphon and penstock causing landscape scarring, some loss of trees,
and encroachment on existing land uses and on down hill slopes,
• Loss of two residences and agricultural land at powerhouse and tail race
sites,
• Reduced water quantity and quality in the Ranolia Khwar.
Loss of water in the Khwar has the potential to affect the water needs of the
population in the valley during the winter months, when the river has a much reduced
natural flow already. In the winter water is used directly from the river for drinking
purposes. Water also supplies micro hydro-projects which provide electricity to the
people of the Khwar (estimated population 9,700). There are also grain grinding mills
which operate in the winter. Estimated use of water for human activity is 200 litres/s
or 0.2 cu.m/s. There are no arrangements for sewage disposal from houses and
shops in the Khwar and human waste disposal already presents a problem.
Reduction in the quantity of water flow in the river also has implications for fish life
and fish movements to and from the river to the catchment above.
Environmental mitigation
The main mitigation measures included in the EMP are as indicated below:
Table 1 Summary of Mitigation

Potential Impact MItigation;„
Destruction and scarring of Implementation through detailed EMP attached
land with construction impacts the IEE including a tree r plantation
in steep mountain terrain programme:•,
Loss of houses and agricultural Project components redesigned to avoid any "-
land and forestry loss of houseS.;',
Resettlement Plan to be impleMented, a
package 'for:Ives of land &trees:..
compensation
Reduced water flows in the Adequate.water 500litnas/s,,retained in ".
river from which water is taken river;` this will be adequate for human and
for the project "fish activities.
As well as resettlement and tree compensation, a tree planting programme is

included in mitigation. Surveys of water quality and fish numbers will take place in the
river as a monitoring precaution.
Mitigation costs are estimated at US$ 462,623 as indicated in Table 2.
Table 2 Summary of Mitigation Costs

Mitigation Measure Total (Rs) Total SUS
Land acquisition & Resettlement costs including 18,38,005: 305,633
compensation for loss of trees.
Plantation of tree for stabilisation & restoration 60,460 , 1,341
Water quality testing to drinking water standards 1,703
Survey fish numbers and movements in the river system 1,937
Environment & Resettlement Implementation Specialist 600;660: 91,666
& Monitoring
Sub-Total 24, 36,865 402,281
15% contingencies 620,630 60,342
Total 27,747,305 I 462,623
Items 3 & 5 are annual costs
Conclusions
The Project will have minimal negative environmental impacts and these can be
successfully mitigated by implementing the EMP attached to the IEE. The IEE and
EMP are adequate to ensure compliance with ADB and GOP environmental
safeguards. On the basis of this IEE, there is no need for a full environmental impact
assessment. However SHYDO, the Implementing Agency, (1E) will need to
strengthen its capabilities to implement and monitor the measures in the EMP. This
has been designed into the project by requiring the setting up of an Environment and
Social Development Unit in SHYDO, the appointment of environmental &
resettlement specialists and the hiring of an independent monitor.
Map 1 Project Area: Ranolia Khwar
Not to Scale - Diagrammatic Representation only

Weir &
Intake
Access Road to
be upgraded
Ranolia Headrace Channel

Bazaar (Upper)
Siphon
RANOLIA
RIVER
Headrace
Channel
(Lower)
Access
Road
Forebay
Penstock Dubair
River
Jijal Bela Dubair

Power
house
-4-
II DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
A Type of and Category of the Project
8. This project, because of its relatively small size (11.5 MW), is classified as a
Category "B" project, in accordance with ADB Guidelines for environmental
assessment, 2003. An Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) is required to
determine if there are significant impacts, in which case, a more detailed
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is necessary.
B Government Approval Requirements
9. The Government of Pakistan has exactly the same environmental

assessment requirement as ADB for hydro projects of less than 50 MW. An IEE
submission is required to the NWFP Provincial EPA by SHYDO. A full scale EIA is
mandatory only for projects bigger than 50 MW unless significant impacts requiring
more study are determined in the IEE report.
C Location and General Description
10. The project is located in Kohistan District of North West Frontier Project in a
side valley of the Indus River know as Ranolia Khwar. RKHP is 150 km north of
Abbottabad, the Regional capital of the Division. River water is diverted from the
Khwar and the main elements of the projects are as follows (see Map 1 also):
• A tvrolean weir and intake structure with gravel trap and a two chamber sand
trap on the right bank of Ranolia Khwar diverting river flow,
• A power canal, 2,650 metre open canal which is 2.3 x 2.5 metres on the right
bank initially, it transfers to the right bank of the river after 2,400 m,
• A 740m inverted siphon across the river which is raised over the river with a
footbridge,
• A forebav (28 x 10m) with a side weir to accommodate surges,
• Penstock with spillway providing the 403 metres gross head of water,
• Powerhouse with two turbines and two generators on the right bank of the
Dubair River, immediately below the main road and close to Dubair Khwar, and
• Discharge of water directly into the Dubair River.
11. The water delivery system is designed to deliver a maximum of 3.5 m3/s to
the turbines and generate 11.5 MW of power. In the summer months the plant will
run at maximum capacity. In winter, when water flows are much reduced, it is
intended to store water in the delivery canal and use the stored water to meet the
four-hour evening peak demand for electricity. There is currently an un-metalled road
into the Ranolia valley. It will be necessary to upgrade this road and a crossing to
provide access for construction of the weir intake. An inspection path will run all
along the power canal to the surge tank. Civil structures for offices, storage of
equipment and residential buildings are required close to the powerhouse to support
operation of the project.
-5-
D. Construction Schedule
12. From the beginning of construction to the commissioning of the project will
take approximately 36 months. Construction work can be undertaken simultaneously
at the weir, power canal, inverted siphon and the powerhouse.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
A. Provincial Context
13. The general project area is characterised by diverse ground topography with
rugged mountains, forested valleys, alpine pastures and rich biodiversity. Fertile
valley soils in some locations support high yielding cash crops. NWFP also
possesses nearly 17 percent of high hill coniferous forest cover3.
14. Various protected areas, spread across the province, are given in the
following Table4: None of the protected areas in Table 3 are in close proximity of
RKHP.
Table 3 Protected Areas in NWFP
Name Area
(hectares)
National Parks 26,602
Wildlife Sanctuaries 34,212
Game Reserves 363,839
Private/Community Game Reserves 345,963
Wildlife Parks 1,948
Wildlife Refuges 2:: 8,954
Total 781,518
B Physical Environment
15. The project falls in a sub-side valley of Pattan Tehsil of District Kohistan,
which is located in the Indus gorge. The main Indus valley is hot, dry and arid. The
side valleys, which are deeply cut meandering gorges, have lush green landscape,
thickly forest laden hill slopes, white water streams and milder climate, which makes
it a tourist destination. The upper valley reaches remain glaciated throughout the
year.
16. The project area has an average yearly rainfall of about 1700 mm. Maximum
precipitation is in the form of winter snow, which is brought by western Mediterranean
winds. Ordinarily, the hottest month of the year is July, where mid day temperatures
may reach in excess of 30° C. Similarly January has the lowest temperatures and
high chill factors and night temperatures reach as low as -30° C5.
17. Soils are a mixture of varying degrees of alluvial deposits, and sizeable
concentrations of organic matter is found in bowl shaped valley depressions. Such
places are used for rich cash crops like off-seasonal vegetables and potatoes.
3 (i) "Environmental Profile of NWFP", May 1994, DHV Consultants, (ii) "Sarhad Provincial
Conservation Strategy", 1996, IUCN.
4 Brief by NWFP Wildlife Department.
5 !bid, paragraph 7.5.2.2.2, page 26, 27.
18. According to "Seismo-Tectonic Map of Pakistan", a sizeable part of Swat

Kohistan belongs to a major earthquake zone with recent past earthquakes up to a
magnitude of M 5 6.5 of the Richter scale. According to the "Structural Geology and
Tectonics" map, the main earthquake centres fall in the Thakote — Pattan — Madyan
triangle. Within a circle of 50 km radius around Madyan, at least two earthquakes
occurred during the last decade with magnitudes of 6.0 5 M 5 6.5. Ranolia is in an
area classified as a relatively calm peripheral zone of the seismic triangles. However,
Dubair river was the epicentre of 6.8 earthquake in 1974 which killed 5,000 people.
19. The Ranolia Khwar system has a total catchment area of only 95 square
kilometres, with a maximum height in the catchment of 4,562 metres above sea level.
There are some small lakes above the tree line in an area of vast grazing pastures.
These pastures are a summer grazing area for the livestock of the people of Ranolia
village.
20. Below the proposed weir site and before the confluence with the main river
there are two small right bank tributaries of the Ranolia Khwar. These streams are
usually dry in the winter months. Eighteen medium and small sized canal off-takes
from the main Khwar below the weir site were identified during the field visit. There
are a number of perennial fresh water springs, which are tapped by the residents to
meet domestic water needs.
21. Water flow readings have been taken daily at Ranolia over a 10 year period
since 1989 when a gauge station was established by SHYDO nearly 1.5 km
upstream of Ranolia bazaar. There is a significant variation in flow rates owing to
seasonal precipitation and the fluctuation of temperatures which affect the rate of
snow melt in the upper catchment.
22. The annual average discharge in the Khwar is 3.4 m3/s. There is a low flow
period extending from November until February, and December and January have
average mean daily flows over the period of record of 0.97 m3/s and 1.54 m3/s,
respectively (data from 1989 to 1999). Monthly flows as low as 0.47 m3/s have been
experienced (January 1996) and the lowest ever-daily flow recorded was 0.39 m3/s
on 22nd January 1996. In spring, with summer snow melt, flow tends to increase and
between May and September there is roughly between 4 and 6 m3/s flow in the
Khwar. During the months March until September thunderstorms can cause peak
flows much in excess of these figures.
C. Ecological Resources
1. Wildlife
23. Since the creation of Kohistan District in 1975-76, the wildlife profile of the
project area has experienced a major decline, mainly due to disputes over forests
between the local people and GoNWFP, excessive forest cutting and commercial
harvesting, slack forest controls, and increased use of armaments. Except for Palas
Valley, on the left bank of Indus River, there has been almost no wildlife survey of
Kohistan District. However, based on consultative sessions with the locals, forest and
wildlife officials during the fieldwork, prevalent wildlife profile of the project area is as
follows':
6
Feasibility study of Ranolia Khawar by SHYDO — GTZ, paragraph 7.4.1.3, page 15.
7An EU funded Palas Conservation & Development Project along the assistance of Wildlife
Department of NWFP have made significant surveys in the neighboring valley, opposite
Ranolia+Dober, across Indus River.
• Mammals: The most common mammal of the area and its adjoining valleys is
the rhesus monkeys — Beza — (Macaca mulatta), which is reported to be
inflicting considerable crop damages. Quite a few farmers regard it as a
menace. Markhor (Capra falconers) and Musk Deer (Moschus moschiferous)
are now very rare in the area, though they were present 20 years ago. Black
Bear (Seienarctos thibetaqnus), Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), Wolf (Canis
lupus), Leopard Cat (Felis bengalensis) and Panther (Panthera uncia) have
also been reported in the area.
• Birds: Besides common birds like Chakor (Alectorista graeca), there are a
variety of highly endangered and rare pheasants in the Kohistan area like
monal — Murghe Zareen — (Lophophorus impeyanus), white crested Khalij
(Lophura leucomelana), Snow Cock (Tetragallus himalayensis), Koklas
(Pucrasia macrolopha), Snow Partridge (Lerwa lerwa) and the most
endangered Western Tragopan (Tragopan meianocephalus)8.
• Reptiles: Owing to climatic severity of hot summers and cold winters, no

significant reptiles have been reported from the project area. Reptilian and
amphibian fauna of the area is not well documented. However, local people
have reported some snakes, with negligible cases of any snakebite. Rock
lizards are common in the region.
24. Snow Leopard, Brown Bear, Musk Deer and Snow Partridge have declining
population and are classified as endangered species. Bears are hunted because of
cattle damages and for extracting their fats, which has high medicinal value.
However, despite the presence of considerable armaments amongst the local
population, no significant cases of illicit hunting and poaching are reported from the
project area.
25. In the immediate Ranolia project area there is degraded habitat and no threat
exists to any rare or endangered species.
2 Forest Resources
26. Once the entire project area had thickly laden high hill coniferous forest,
associated with the dry-temperate climate zone. The forest is now somewhat
degraded. Deodar (Cedarus deodara) is the dominant tree species (constituting more
than 50 % of the tree cover); it is regarded as the best quality construction timber.
Other coniferous species are Blue Pine (Pinus wallichiana), Fir (Abies pindro) and
Spruce (Pacea smithiana). The common broad-leafed tree varieties are Walnut
(Juglan regia), Bankhore (Aesculus indica), Oak (Qurcus ilex), Shard (Shoria
rolousta), Amlok (Dispyros lotus), Kangar (Pistachia intergermia), Toot (Morus alba
and Morus serrata) and Barmi (Texus baccata), the later being a threatened species.
The under-growth of shrubs on these slopes is Kainth (Indigofera gerardiana), Guchh
(Viburnum narosam), and Barunj (Ferosia jacomentiana). More recently exotic
species like Eucalyptus, Acacia robinica, and Bakain (Melia azdarach) have also
been introduced into the area, displaying good signs of adaptability.
27. Forests of the entire Indus Kohistan fall in the category of "Protected Forests",
including the project area. These forests were taken over by NWFP Forest
Department at the time of amalgamation of Indus Kohistan tribal belt into the Hazara
8 Key objective of PCDP is to save the habitat of tragopan, the last natural habitat of this bird
in the Himalayas.
Division in 1974. The proportionate share of stakeholders in timber sales is as

follows:
• 60 % local population,
• 20 % handling charges by FD or Forest Development Corporation, and
• 20 % for the development of exploited forest resource.
28. Besides this share in the sale proceeds for harvested timber, the local
population also enjoys other rights like grazing, grass cutting, local construction
timber needs and fuel-wood collection etc. Landowners are legally required to obtain
formal permits from Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) to cut pine trees for their house
construction needs. In practice, they cut pine and other trees for both firewood and
timber needs, and even for sale and furniture making. Their largest wood
consumption is for cooking and heating in the snowy winters.
29. As well as meeting the construction timber and fuel needs, these forests yield
non-forest timber products (NFTP), which are of significant economic importance for
the local population. Such products include mushrooms, Black Moral fetching the
highest prices, a large number of medicinal herbs and a variety of grasses, being the
main source of cattle fodder.
30. Common forest crimes reported by local forest officials are illicit tree cutting
and timber smuggling. Dober-Ranolia forest range has a forest area of 3,557 ha and
a non-forest area of 14,165 hag.
31. Ranolia valley has less forest cover than adjoining valleys. Local elders stated
that considerable forests were destroyed due to apprehensions that the Forestry
Department would take it over at the time of the annexation of the area into Kohistan.
Once densely forested, the area was heavily deforested by local people and
contractor in the 1970s and 1980s, and this left coniferous cover restricted to the
mountain tops. Further commercial logging was banned by the Government in 1992,
following the catastrophic flooding in other parts of the country. To replace the lost
forest cover, a reforestation project was implemented during part of the 1990s10, with
planting of various exotic and native broad-leaf species, which are yet to reach
maturity, mostly on the lower ridges and on stream-banks. As a result, this valley has
experienced the stress of fuel-wood shortages for some years. It is estimated that in
winters an average family is consuming nearly 50 — 55 kg of fuel-wood on a daily
basis. Local people have also started using dried cow-dung cakes for fuel
purposes".
3 Fish Resources
32. There are limited data available regarding fish species in the Dubair Khwar
system. No specific information was found for Ranolia Khwar. However, there were
fish surveys in September 1995 of other streams in NWFP including three sites in the
Indus River system12.
33. Swati fish (Schizothorax plagiostomas) , which breeds throughout the year is
found in most rivers of NWFP, including Indus River tributaries. Other studies (Allai
Khwar Fish Survey, Jan 1998) state that 12 indigenous species have been recorded
in the valley. Trout have been introduced in Dubair Khwar in 1990. This stream is
9 Working Plan, Dober Forest Range, 2000 — 2003, page 1.

10 ADB-assisted "NWFP Forestry Development Sector Project", 1995-99.
11 Working Plan, Dober Forest Range, 2000 — 2003, 4.8 Use of Natural Resources, page 22.
12 Open Water Fisheries Management Plan Directorate of Fisheries, Peshawar.
being restocked by the Fisheries Department on a regular basis through their

hatchery at Upper Dubair Village, nearly 16 km upstream of its confluence with
Ranolia Khwar. No trout is, however, found in the Ranolia Khwar and local Fisheries
officers put this down to the relative low flows and warmer temperatures in this
Khwar.
34. Discussions with local people indicate there is a low dependence upon
fishing, which is done casually mainly for domestic consumption using nets, which
are used illegally. Angling with rods is totally unknown in this valley.
D Socio-Economical and Cultural Environment

35. The people of the area belong to different Kohistani tribes and sub-tribes
which account for more than 97% of the total population of the project area. They
mainly speak Kohistani, but most men also speak Urdu and Pushto. Due to the
conservative nature of Kohistanis, there are almost no outsiders settled in the area.
36. The central village in the project valley is called Ranolia, after which the
project takes its name. This village is situated in the middle of the valley and on both
sides of the Khwar with a bridge connection at the Ranolia bazaar (see Map 1). On
either side of the Ranolia Khwar and on the slopes overlooking the valley there are
additional scattered sparsely distributed clusters of habitation. The valley sides are
steep but land is terraced wherever possible for agricultural purposes.
37. There are some 13 recognised villages in the valley with 60 additional
mountain-side hamlets scattered on the upper slopes. One small settlement, Jijal
Bela affected by the powerhouse site, is in the Dubair valley on the Karakoram
Highway. Table 4 shows the population of the 14 settlements; together with 60
hamlets there is an estimated population of 9,700 persons in the project area.
Table 4: Estimated Size and Population of Villages in Ranolia Valley

o ' Name of Location` .1A Number of 't Ay8rsge : Estimated
^rl Village/Hamlet an ro rh' '' r
HHcSize;Population
Upper Hamlets (60) BetyMeirnta 360 1 4,000
Mani Khel Bela "'Rig titffili, ea 5rP 62 1 750
Khoshi Bela R let/I./y5r ,Y 13 1 3: 160
Dhar Mir Khel r:= Rig ifili tin 40 25 500
Bar Kilay, Ranolla - RI MAIO -4,qco, , , 82 12.2 1,000
Ashiyal v Igf . 16 200
Serai ' Rig t Ban 19 250
8 Kuz Kilay, Ranolia es 63 rn-r? 11. 9 4 750
Zorh Kiley - Dongo Right/Hig 72 ,. 11.8 850
10'"' Gabair FOfit/Sii*Off-S 6 !' 12.5`'
1 11 Ghall Left/SvPhOrilS 33 12.1 400
260
13 Chuchang
Seirtoo
15 " Jijal Bela (Dubalr)* RIght/POwerhc,puse 21 280
esti 827 11.7, „9.700 ,
• Jijal Bela is situated about 600 m north of Dubair Bazaar, on the Dubair Valley Road (see Map), downstream of
Ranolia Khwar confluence with Dubair Khwar. (From Resettlement Plan) From Resettlement Plan
-10-
38. The population is living mostly in a joint and extended family system with all
family members, even the married sons, living jointly in a large house with separate
accommodation under the authority of the father who, as head of the family,
manages family affairs. The social and cultural context of the tribal (clan) society is
patriarchal. The jirga (committee of elders) represents the Ranolia Khwar community
and is the decision making body.
39. The average household (HH) size for Kohistan District has decreased from 9
persons in 1981 to 6.4 persons in 1998, while the annual population growth rate has
declined significantly from 10.18% in 1981 to 0.09 % in 1998.13 In rural areas of
NWFP the average size of HHs is only 7.6714 persons whereas in Ranolia Valley the
average HH size amounts to 11.7 (see Table 4). On average two members are
employed per HH.
40. Education levels in Kohistan District are very low compared to Swat or the
overall situation in NWFP. The total literacy rate for persons aged 10 years and
above is only 11.08%15 (17.23% for males and 2.97% for females). Of those
receiving education 33.60% have passed primary school, 17.21% middle school and
17.07% matriculation, while only 0.82% graduated.
41. School enrolment" rates are very low with 10.60% for males and 1.34 % for
females. Ranolia has several Primary Schools for boys and girls and a Middle and
High School for boys as shows in Table 5. However, three of the five girls primary
schools, although constructed, have never opened because of lack of interest on the
part of villagers to educate their daughters, and the non-availability of female
teachers. Only two schools (at Kuz Kilay and Tehsil Banda) are running each having
around 50 girls students but female teachers come from Mansehra District and are
often absent. There are no educated girls in the whole valley who could be teachers.
Table 5: Schools in Ranolia Valley

Location rlmary School Middle School I liSchOo:l.
Village/Hamlet t Boys Girls i Boya Girls oy Girls
Upper Hamlets (60)
Mani Khel Bela
Dhar Mir Khel
Bar Kiley, Ranolia
Kuz Kilay, Ranolia
Zorh Kiley - Dongo
Gabair
Ghail
Tehsil Banda
10 Jijal Bela (Dubair)
Totat:
From Resettlement Plan
13 Source: District Census Report of Kohistan District, Population Census organization,

Statistic Division, GoP 1999.
14 Source: Summary of Household Integrated Economic Survey 2001/2002, page 10.
" Source: Population Census 2001 & National Institute of Population Studies Islamabad 1998
updated 2002.
'° Enrollment rate is defined as the percentage of students to population of ages 5-24 years.
42. In the whole of Kohistan there is only one hospital and 37 Basic Health
Centres, one of which serves the project hamlets of Mani Khel Bela and Tehsil
Banda. It was, however, without a medical officer during the field study visits
undertaken and the nearest medical officer available was at Dubair Bizaar on the
main road. The closest female health officer is at Besham. The main diseases are
reported as being diarrhoea, dysentery, fever and headache.
43. Residents of project area rigidly follow traditional cropping practices. Maize is
the main crop (see Photo No 1) and a little wheat is grown as a staple food crop, but
wheat is normally brought from outside the valley. Pulses and pumpkins are
available, but few vegetables are cultivated and commercial cultivation is almost
unknown. Vegetables are usually obtained from Swat. Except for walnut and a wild
black berry, amlok, no other fruit has been noted during the field visit. Due to the
relatively steep slopes terraced fields are very small and cropping intensity is high.
44. Most households have one cow and between two to five goats for milk. The
livestock is grazed in the mountains as fodder resources are scarce in the valley.
Poor households keep some chicken for eggs, consumption and sale.
45. Households need additional money to satisfy their various daily needs. So,
majority of the male population, even children, go to down country towns for both
seasonal and year-round jobs to earn cash to supplement their household needs.
46. Seasonal migration in winter time is the general strategy to substitute food
production by cash availability. In some families male members even stay on a long
term contract for several years in Saudi Arabia, thus contributing to the joint family
income. In winter, in all households, several family members travel south for
seasonal work. Only their dehqans stay behind in Ranolia to take care of their
homes. Depending on the quality of work, household members can save between
1,000 and 10,000 Rs per person. They work in factories, in construction business, as
daily labourers and watchmen.
47. The average monthly income in rural areas in NWFP amounts to Rs. 6,031 ($
100) whereas in urban areas it is Rs. 9,90417 ($ 165).
48. A little additional cash income comes from business and transportation. Table
6 indicates the number of shops in Ranolia Valley. Of 15 villages/hamlets in the
project area only 8 have access to shops of any kind.
17cited from Summary of Household Integrated Economic Survey, Federal Bureau of

Statistics, Government of Pakistan, 2003, p. 10
-12-
Table 6: Shops in Ranolia Valley

No. Name of Number
Village/Hamlet of Shops
Upper Hamlets (60)
Mani Khel Bela
Dhar Mir Khel
Bar Kilay, Ranolia
Kuz Kilay, Ranolia 6
Zorh Kilay - Dongo
Tahsil Banda
Jijal Bela (Dubair)
From Resettlement Plan
49. The distribution of relative poverty in the settlements in the project area is
shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Relative Poverty Distribution in Villages

Name of Percentsigii letribution of POputatiOn*,,
Village/Hamlet Medium Better- Rich otal
Upper Hamlets (60) 60

Mani Khel Bela 60 5
Khoshi Bela 60
Dhar Mir Khel 70
Bar Kilay, Ranolia 50 5 4:-
Ashiyal 50 10
Serai 60 10
Kuz Kilay, Ranolia 40 25 "NM
Zorh Kiley - Dongo 40 20 bitas
10 '71Tbb
1 Gabair
4.4 70
Ghail 75
Tahsil Banda 60 10 P97
Chuchang 70 !1; 10
14 Seirtoo 75 5
Jijal Bela (Dubair) 50
Poverty Categories by Average Monthly Income (Pak. Ruoeesl: Poor: upto Rs. 6,000; Medium: Rs.
6,000-9,000; Better Off: Rs. 9,000-12,000; Rich: Above Rs. 12,000. From Resettlement Plan
50. Since creation of the Kohistan District in 1976, there has been no land
settlement survey by the state revenue agencies. Hence, the inheritance land
divisions, sale transactions and many other land related matters are being handled in
a traditional system.
51. There is no central water supply system by Public Health Engineering

Department (PHED) in the Ranolia Khwar. The local government has made some
attempts to provide water supply, but, because of scattered residences, the rural
populace depends upon a number of perennial springs to meet their drinking water
supply needs. Besides washing, bathing and cattle watering, some people also
-13-
depend upon river water for drinking in the summer months because of its relative
coolness.
52. Water for irrigation is diverted from the Ranolia Khwar. 24 watermills and 18
irrigation intakes were identified. Watermills operate throughout the year, whereas
the irrigation intakes are needed only in the period April — October. The water for
milling always flow back into the river, sometimes after having passed a cascade of
four mills. The amount of water diverted varies between 45 and 85 I/s. The minimum
discharge needed to supply milling requirement in the Khwar is, therefore, regarded
as a flow of 100 Vs, which is needed throughout the year. There are also 8 micro
hydropower projects which operate year round. Table 8 gives an overview of the
estimated water demand in the project area in winter months.
Table 8: Water Demand for Community Infrastructure in Winter
Water demand .40.W

" .,
fi,rer
.rf!,,,. 100 I/sec (if there are by
tedime: chance 2 watermills at the
Z-.: - same level: 200 Vsec.)
1 cow/30 I/day
winter 1 cow/30 I/day
53. Taking into consideration the water demand of the population for the different
community purposes, the total residual water requirements from activities of the
villagers are estimated at 200 litres/s including water losses.
54. Kohistan does not attract significant numbers of tourists. However, the
Karakoram Highway passes along the Dubair River to Northern Areas and China.
With a general lack of flat building lands, there has been a growth of hotels and
shops, all along the main highway such as Dubair bazaar, without any master
planning and negligible controls by the respective state regulatory institutions.
Buildings in Dubair and in Ranolia dispose of their sewage effluents and solid wastes
directly into the water courses. There are few flush toilets and the fields are used for
defecation and the human waste is used for fertilizing crops. Sewage and other
wastes are increasingly disposed of into the Ranolia Khwar. This creates a potential
health hazard, which becomes more of a problem during periods of low river flow,
when the effluents are not being diluted.
55. The entire Kohistan District suffers from poor infrastructure development.
Following the1974 earthquake in the area the Kohistan Development Project (KDP)
was set up. It was during that period that a small hydropower plant of 150 kW
capacity was constructed at Dubair using Ranolia Khwar as its source. Subsequently
this plant was taken over by SHYDO, but the generators have been taken away and
the plant has been idle for more than two years.
56. A shingle road of 6 — 7 km length leads up the valley, terminating at the

village Bela Mani Khel. There is no mains electricity supply in any villages in the
valley. The nearest telephone service is in Dubair bazaar.
-14-
IV CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS
57. Various design alternatives have been investigated during the course of the
EA and measures have been adopted in the IEE mitigation to minimise
environmental impacts. The original design of the project has been changed and
savings between the original design and the proposed new design for the project are
summarised in Table 9. The alternatives adopted result in less permanent land loss,
fewer trees being taken and allows existing community infrastructure on the Khwar to
continue to function. Measures are discussed in more detail in subsequent Chapters.
Table 9: Comparison of Impacts by Original and New Design of RKHP

Item w Unit Initial Saving
gDesign
k: t Affected Land - Forest/Pasture 6,700 1,420
Affected Land - Farmlands 1,100 0,415
Stone Quarry Site (Forest Land) 0,150 20: 0,030
Intake & Gravel/SandTrap (Farmland) 0,12 0,080
Relocation of Residential Houses* r ii 8 6
Forest - VVild Oak Trees Num 250 68 . 82
Forest - Other Wood Trees (Planted) N 200 61
Privately Planted Fruit Trees 12 7
Residual Water Flow (Winter Season) ; Litres/S (500)
Irrigation Channels (Winter Season) 18 18
Water Mills (Winter Season) M berg 24 24
AI Micro-Hydros (Winter Season) 8 M 8
Affected Persons (APs) Number 37 14
' At Weir Site One House saved, at Penstock-Powerhouse of seven houses, only two now affected.
V SCREENING OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION
58. The ADB rapid environmental assessment checklist for hydropower projects
was used to screen for potential environmental impacts. Aspects of the project, which
were determined as having impacts, are analysed further and, where necessary, are
addressed with mitigation measures. The checklist is attached as Annex 2 to this
document. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Table 20 identifies all
aspects of the project where there are potential impacts and then addresses each
impact in terms of mitigation and institutional responsibility for implementation.
A. Positive Impacts
59. The project will provide Ranolia, the wider population of the Dubair Khwar and
NWFP with significant benefits. Electricity generated will supply the national
electricity grid along with other hydropower projects in the region and the people will
have the convenience of mains power twenty fours a day for domestic and business
activities. Mains power will mean cooking and domestic heating for those who can
afford it, which will reduce consumption of timber and other fossil fuels for this
purpose.
60. DKHP will also provide unskilled jobs during the construction phase and a
limited number of jobs in operations. This will be a bonus for the men of the area,
many of whom are used to having to travel down country for employment.
-15-
61. Hydropower is a clean and renewable source of energy and avoids

contributions to pollution loads, which would result from the alternative use of thermal
electricity generation. Hence, it is environment friendly. Thermal power generation
plants are known for a large variety of toxic emissions i.e. carbon dioxide (CO2),
particulate matter (PM), sulphur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO) and Oxides of
Nitrogen (NO,) etc. The following table provides a comparative analysis of estimated
emissions of CO2 from a power station generating the same amount of energy over a
30 year period using oil, gas & coal as a fuel source. Between 0.45 and 0.79 metric
tons of carbon dioxide is saved over the 30 years of the project by using hydro power
rather than fossil fuels.
Table 10 Comparative Analysis of CO2 Emission using Oil, Gas & Coal for Generation
iNel Source Oil 8S Coal
Grams CO2 297 ;'.'i232 410
(million'. 0.57 9:4 0.79
Note: Assumes generation of 64.3 GWh per year over a 30 year project life = 1929 GWh.
62. An extension of the electricity generation system will take place, and SHYDO
will ensure the distribution network is in place to provide electricity to local people
prior to the commissioning of the project.
B Loss of Land and Houses
63. For the construction of the various elements of the RKHP there will be a
permanent loss of 6.22 ha of commonly owned forest/pasture land and privately
owned farmlands (see Table 11). Only 0.68 ha of the land required is private land.
There are total of 23 households who will lose a total of 0.685 ha of privately owned
farmlands at six locations. Two landowners will lose over 10% of their productive
terraced farmland. In addition, two residential houses will be affected by the penstock
and powerhouse construction in Jijal Bela by the Dubair Khwar and road.
Table 11: Permanent Land Acquisition by Type of Land for Ranolia HPP
Component led Forest/Riverbed ri*a
Land (ha) Farmiands (ha
Rock Quarry Site (Weir) 0.120
Diversion Weir (3 m high) 0.080
Intake Channel (from Weir)
Channel:Gravel+SandTraps 0.035
Spillway-1 (Sand Trap) 0.025
Power Channel —A 1.400
Syphon (Embedded Pipe) 0.700
Power Channel — B 1.000
Surge Tank + Dumping Site 0.120
Piped Penstock + Spillway-2 0.600
Power House (+Switch Yard)
Staff Colony + Rest House 0.300
Access Road (New) 0.900
SONO! (1.0P0.00 5.965 4480
Transmission Line (33KV) 010 0.252
otal Land:.; 6.217 5.532, 0.685
Percentage 100.0 89.0 11.0
Figures from Resettlement Plan
-16-
64. A number of village consultations meetings took place in Ranolia and Dubair
Village with Affected People and as a result, the alignment of the penstock and the
design of the powerhouse were slightly altered to save five houses, while two houses
could not be saved. The latter have been considered for relocation against adequate
cash compensation, including a relocation and disturbance allowance. During the
consultation meetings, an option of relocation by the project was offered but both the
affected persons preferred self-relocation.
65. In addition to the permanent land requirement, temporary land acquisition will
be needed at two sites, namely at the diversion weir and the powerhouse sites. Total
area for temporary acquisition is estimated at 0.15 ha which will be mostly the
riverbed or forest/pasture lands, and not the farmlands. This land will be acquired for
a maximum period of three years. According to the local rates, the total rent for this
land lands is computed at Rs. 90,000 (US$ 1,500). For further details of
compensation see the Resettlement Plan.
C Loss of Trees
66. It is estimated that in total 252 trees (pines, other native species and some
fruit trees) will be affected by the project and a further 60 will be affected by the
transmission lines. The location of trees at the various project locations is given in
Table 12).
Table 12: Number of Affected Trees

Other Wood Trees Total
Trees
o Project Site Small rt Laig e Small Mixed (All)
Rock Quarry Site (Weir) 6 9
Diversion Weir (3 m high) 0
Intake Channel (from Weir) 1 2
Channel:Gravel+SandTraps 0
Wa Spillway-1 (Sand Trap) 0
Power Channel - A 16 58
;az ,Syphon (Embedded Pipe) 3 too ,..,i6.,, 3 15
ir Power Channel - B
t; Surge Tank + Dumping Site
Piped Penstock + Spillway-2
6 7,,34
10 ;--='
5
40 90
16
23
1 Power House (+Switchgear)
12 ,4 Staff Colony + Rest House
3 Access Road (New) 21 33
griFTWIalWg 80 52 3679 ,5 2527
Transmission Line (33KV) , 12 24 : 18 60
T,94.1Atre t*i'i 92 '- 6, 42 97 2:
Figures from Resettlement Plan
D. Construction Impacts and Mitigation
1 Materials
67. Good quality construction stone is available and temporary sites will be
identified for small quarries at the weir and siphon sites. A mobile crusher will be
required at these small quarries. These sites will be supervised and restored on
-17-
completion of the work with the planting of trees. Sand for production of concrete for
construction of the project will be imported from the lower reaches of the Indus valley,
as far down as Dandai-Maira, nearly 50 — 60 km from Dober. These are established
quarries alongside the main road, which have been in use a long time for
construction of the Karakoram Highway.
2 Construction Activities
68. The canal structure (1.6m wide by 1.7m deep) will be constructed using stone
masonry on a labour-intensive basis. The canal will pass through glacial moraine, but
there are also some solid rock sections, which are steep and blasting will be
required. There is potential for the power canal to be constructed with significant
scarring of the landscape and encroachment on downhill slopes if material is pushed
down the slopes and not removed or consolidated properly. The penstock will be
constructed on steep slopes and there is some habitation and gardens in the general
area. It is also intended to construct the penstock over-ground raised on concrete
pedestal blocks. Here there is also potential for erosion.
69. To avoid slippage of stone and earth material, stone gabions retaining
structures will be used to prevent slippage of soil adjacent to the canal. Maximum
use will be made of material in fill areas and there will be proper spoil planning
particularly on steep slopes with bench terracing for high cut areas and avoidance of
any pushing of material down slopes. Trees will be planted to consolidate and re-
vegetate canal and penstock areas (see Table 20 for full details).
70. The siphon 744m in length will transfer the canal from left to right bank of the
Khwar. It consists of a steel pipe 1.29m in diameter and it will be buried for most of its
length. For the river crossing two alternatives were considered in the previous
feasibility study (over or under the Ranolia Khwar bed). The siphon will be raised
over the Khwar and will incorporate a 30m bridge, which can be used for local
access.
71. It is intended that the canal and siphon construction is undertaken with the
temporary erection of rail track and steps using trolleys from Ranolia Khwar banks to
the inlet pond and outlet pond for erection of the siphon pipe and also for transport of
material to construct the canal. Similarly a second rail track is proposed for penstock
construction from power house site to surge bay. Using this method of construction
avoids more intrusive temporary road access and will minimise the environmental
impact of construction.
3. Road Access
72. This project does not need any additional or exclusive access roads. The site
of the powerhouse is located adjacent to an existing sealed road. The existing road
up to the weir will be improved, sealed and provided with improved bridges and funds
are included in the project budget for this. A 1.5 m wide inspection path will be built
alongside the power canal to allow construction of the canal and provide access for
operations.
4. Construction Site and Camp Impacts
73. The construction of the project will be manpower intensive and where
possible local labour force will be used. The contractor and sub-contractors building
the project will require a temporary labour camp accommodation for staff. There may
be social impacts, particularly as the local people in the Ranolia area are unused to
-18-
outsiders. Contractors will be obliged to employ local labour where available and this
will be written into contracts. Labour accommodation may be required at different
locations — weir, siphon and penstock locations and any camps will be located away
from local settlements in the Khwar.
74. Construction camps and the long term residential colony have the potential
for environmental impacts in terms of solid and wastewater emissions. Clauses will
be placed in sub-contracts to build the project requiring adequate water supply, solid
waste and sewage disposal facilities.
75. The main construction site area is intended to be located close to the
powerhouse site. With batching plant and material storage there will be associated
dust problems. Conditions requiring the contractor to suppress any dust hazards by
the use of water spraying of roads during dry periods will be included in contracts.
76. The construction site and any temporary residential areas will be cleaned of
all debris and properly restored on completion of construction and when building
contractors abandon the site.
E. Loss of Water to the River System
1. Human Impacts
77. As well as some use for drinking water, various activities of the population
rely directly on the river for yearlong activities. These activities include watermills
(photograph 3), power plants (photograph 2), livestock use and mosques. Irrigation
water for crops is only required in the summer months when water flows in the Khwar
are naturally relatively high. Adequate water will, therefore, be available for irrigation
in summer even when the project is working at full capacity. For the activities which
continue throughout the year, it is estimated that a minimum usage of 200 litres/s is
required (see Table 8: Water Demand for Community Infrastructure in Winter).
78. Water borne disease is already prevalent in the area. Unfortunately there
seem to be no records of testing of the quality of river or spring water for drinking
purposes. Any reduction in the amount of water flows in the Ranolia Khwar will
increase the public health risk. The potential hazard becomes more acute as river
levels drop and there is no or reduced cleansing and dilution process. Taking all the
water flow for an extended period from the Khwar will result in stagnation of water
and the potential for water borne disease and health risks. It would also exacerbate
existing water usage conflicts.
2. Fish Impacts
79. If all the water is taken from the Ranolia Khwar during the winter, there is
likely to be severe impacts on fish populations. Any movement of fish upstream will
be impossible. Downstream movement will be through the project water delivery and
powerhouse and fish will have to pass through the turbine system. Fish breeding
activity would be interrupted in the winter. During the five summer months May to
September water flows would be sufficient to allow fish to travel to and from the
Dubair River to the lakes in the upper reaches of the Ranolia Khwar catchment.
80. There are a whole series of small and medium sized projects identified by
SHYDO and WAPDA in NWFP and Swat valleys in the Regional Power Plan. If a
number of these projects are constructed and no consideration is given to providing
adequate all year round water flows for fish movements, there is likely to be
-19-
accumulated environmental impacts and reduced overall fish populations, as fish are
increasingly denied access to the upper reaches of Pakistan's river systems.
F Specific Mitigation Measures
1 Compensation and Resettlement

81. A sum of US$ 351,478 is allocated for the various elements of compensation
and resettlement including tree compensation (see Table 13: Estimated Cost of Land
Acquisition and Resettlement). More details are available in the Resettlement Plan
document.
Table 13: Estimated Cost of Land Acquisition and Resettlement

Description 4 Unit6 Quantity i,Meanita Estimated Amount
Rs.
Land Acquisition - Forest/Pasture* 5,532 Z. 00 11.769,330
Land Acquisition - Farmlands* . 0,685 3,544,875
Temporary Land Acquisition (3 yrs) 0,150 90,000
Compensation for Affected Houses** 2 377,5 2,755,000 4 917-1
Compensation for Affected Trees 312 178,800 ;2,8980,
71 r
Zsisigto , 18,338,005 rjOSOI
Contingencies (15%) 45,845
VERALL COSTS:-.1, 21,088,706 L66147
Including 15% CAS for Land Acquisition.
"*. Including Land Price and Relocation & Disturbance Allowance at 15% (in line with LAA: 15% CAS).
2. River Water Flow
82. If the project is implemented, as assumed in the previous feasibility report,

and all the water in the river is used for power generation, during the winter months
(October to April) there will be severe impacts on the ecology, human activities and
the health of the population in the 5 km stretch of the Ranolia Khwar.
83. The impacts defined would be significant in the no water scenario, where the
river is totally deprived of flow. It is also not acceptable to give the river just enough
water to cover the daily human requirement for water in the winter (200 litres/s). It is
also impossible to accurately define the quantitative impacts with respect to fish and
fish habitat loss and with respect to the human health issues.
84. In the absence of a specific Pakistan guideline for the amount of water to be
retained in a watercourse when water is extracted for hydropower purposes, it was
decided to employ Swiss standards for residual water. The Swiss mountain
topography and hydrology is similar to the mountain streams of northern Pakistan.
The minimum residual water flow to be left in a river is determined by a formula. For
water bodies with a 500 litres/s discharge for Q34718 a residual flow of 280 litres/s
must be retained in the water body. For each further discharge of 100 litres/s above
500 litres/s an additional 31 litres/s must be left in the water body.
85. In the case of Ranolia Khwar the Q347 flow is 810 litres/s and the residual flow
required is 280 + 124 (4 x 31) = 404 litres/s. It is recommended that 500 litres/s be
left in the Khwar.
18 Q347 means the discharge appearing in the river 347 days a year, i.e. more than 95% of the
year
-20-
86. This is the main mitigation measure proposed by this IEE. The design of the
project will be revised to provide a guaranteed flow of 500 litres/s. Because the
proposed new 500 litres/s winter flow will be less than existing winter flow levels,
SHYDO will initially undertake a base line survey of drinking water quality. A follow-
up programme of water quality testing will then be undertaken to ensure that drinking
water quality standards are met in the river once the project is in operation.
3. Fish Mitigation Measures
87. Ensuring year round water in the river will assist fish populations and will
hopefully have little impact on migration and breeding habits. However, as 500
litres/s in the river is still below normal winter flows, it is important that fish
populations are monitored. The following points are suggested for sampling:
• immediately below the confluence of Ranolia Khwar with the Dubair River,
• in the 5 km stretch of the Ranolia Khwar and,
• at a site above the Ranolia Khwar.
88. The fish-monitoring programme is proposed on a quarterly basis using

Fisheries Department Peshawar or a consultant (specific programme to be
developed in conjunction with Government fisheries specialist). The survey
programme should be started as soon as possible to provide base line data on
numbers and migration patterns. Costs for the survey are indicated in Table 14
below.
89. It is further strongly recommended that SHYDO commission other fish

population surveys in parallel with the Ranolia Khwar survey in the other valley
systems where river based hydropower schemes are proposed.
Table 14 Annual Budget for Fish Sampling

Mi771 Item
Hiring of field Assistants (Qualification: M.Sc Zoology) =1 Nos.
Four visits © Rs. 600/day
Hiring of fish anglers = 3 Nos.
fa* fish sample collection on four visits © Rs. 2001 day
Hking of Taxonomist = 1 No. for identification of benthic samples
Hiring of Taxonomist =1 No. for identification of fish samples
Hiring of smutty staff = 2 Nos. Four visits © Rs. 200/ day
Honoraria for Driver Far visits © Rs. 300/ day
74 :1 Vehicle + POL charges Four visits © Rs. 5000/1rip
Chemical for operation of equipments
Batteries for operation of equipments
Purchase of sampling bottles
Report VVriting
Stationary charges
Honoraria to Fisheries Supervisory Staff SAO;
Honoraria Field Staff
Total: 97,300::
30 % contribution b the salaries of the official staffwil go to the Government
17, Grand Total ,116,200
Based on Information supplied by Fisheries Department NWPF
-21-
Planting of 65 saplings, including carriage and .1.3 131.00

wing walls around pits, @ 50 plants/day.
Procurement of 65 plants, © Rs.5/plant. 325.00
iii. Sub-Total 556.00
Total 5,364.00
94. Rs. 53,640 is, therefore, set aside for a tree raising programme and trees will
be planted for slope stabilization along the canal, penstock area and at all project
sites such as the weir quarry area. For landscaping implementation and planting of
other shrubs and greenery, a further 50% of the tree raising costs (i.e. Rs 26,820) is
added. The total amount set aside for trees and landscaping is therefore Rs 80,460.
5. Water Quality Monitoring Program
95. A water monitoring quality program is proposed to assess impacts of reduced

water flows in the Ranolia Khwar. Water quality will be sampled and tested against
Pakistan and WHO parameters for drinking water quality. It is intended that SHYDO
use PCSIR (Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) laboratory at
Peshawar for this purpose. Locations for sampling will be discussed with PCSIR but
should be taken on a quarterly basis at the following locations:
• at the weir intake,

• an intermediate point between weir and the confluence with Dubair Khwar, &
• immediately before the confluence of the Ranolia Khwar with the Dubai Khwar.
96. The annual cost of water sampling is indicated in Table 17
Table 17 Annual Budget for Quarterly Analysis of Drinking Water Quality
US$
Hiring of Field Assistant © Rs. 600/ day 2 x 4 x 600 80
Honoraria for Driver @ Rs. 300/ day 40
Vehicle + POL charges © Rs. 4,250/trip 283
Purchase of sampling bottles 34
Honoraria for Field Assistant 1 x 4 © 2,000 266
Sample testing @ Rs 5,000 per sample 4 x 3 x 5000 1,000
Total: 1,703
G Impacts and Mitigation of Transmission Lines

97. Ranolia powerhouse will be connected to the national grid by a 33 kV
transmission line which will be constructed along the Karakorum Highway to
Besham, a distance of 36 km. For the 36 km long 33 kV transmission line it is
estimated that 0.252 ha of land is required on the basis of 7 poles per kilometre with
each pole requiring 10 m2. The lines will be within the existing road right-of-way
(Row), for which no additional land acquisition is necessary.
98. The transmission lines do not pass through any protected area, ecological
reserve or wildlife habitat. 60 trees will be affected (see Table 12: Number of Affected
Trees), and this will be mitigated through a re-plantation programme.
-23-
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN AND

INSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
99. Project mitigation measures and costing are indicated in the Table 18
Proposed Mitigation Costs below. The measures for tree plantation, water and fish
sampling require ongoing monitoring will be managed and monitored by SHYDO.
Table 18 Proposed Mitigation Costs

Mitigation Measure Total (Rs) Total $US
Land acquisition costs including compensation for 6536,665" 305,633
loss of trees.
Plantation of trees & landscaping on slopes & for 1,341
restoration of quarry area & at other locations
Sample water testing on quarterly basis, as per 1,703
WHO and Ministry of Health parameters at (i) weir
intake, (ii) intermediate point between weir &
confluence of Ranolia Khwar with main river, & (iii)
immediately above the confluence with the Dubair
Khwar.
Fish survey, with specific focus on the availability of 1,937
various varieties, its quantification, breeding period,
and migration patterns.
Environment & Resettlement Implementation ,564 600 . 99,666
Specialist & Monitoring
Sub-Total 136,800 402,280
15% contingencies 60,342
Total ,27,757,320 462,622
3 to 5 are annual costs
100. The Environmental Management Plan is developed in full in Table 20.

Supervision and implementation of the EMP will be undertaken by SHYDO
management in conjunction with proposed implementation specialists.
101. SHYDO will also obtain approvals from EPA GoNWFP and then monitor the
project and forward monitoring reports on a regular basis to the Provincial EPA as
per the requirements of the Federal EPA regulations. This IEE and the EMP will form
the basis of a submission for environmental approval from the EPA GoNWFP.
102. SHYDO will be responsible for ensuring that conditions are included in project
construction contract documents. It will also ensure that during the construction
phase, environmental mitigation measures, as per the EMP, are effective and are
implemented. The EMP implementation will be coordinated with relevant Government
Agencies such as Forest, Fisheries and Wildlife Departments, for such activities as
securing removal permits for trees on the power canal route and the implementation
of the monitoring programmes.
103. SHYDO has engineering and support staff, but has no specific capacity or
qualified personnel in the environment and resettlement fields. SHYDO is, however,
currently responsible for the Malakand III project and wants to develop other
hydropower projects in NWFP. To handle its general environmental responsibilities
SHYDO will develop the necessary capacity and allocate manpower to specifically
implement the Ranolia Khwar environmental management plan and monitoring
programme.
-24-
104. SHYDO will create an Environmental and Social Development Cell (ESDC)
similar to that already at WAPDA. The cell will consist of two members: an
environmental specialist and a resettlement specialist. The ESDC will work in close
cooperation with the respective field-based office on the day-to-day activities of the
Short Resettlement Plan implementation. ToR for these positions is attached in
Annex 3.
105. As SHYDO does not yet have the expertise and capacity required for
implementing the IEE and Resettlement Plan, it will have to depend on additional
external technical assistance and will, therefore, hire the following additional
expertise:
• Two part time Implementation Consultants (Environmental and Resettlement

Specialists) who will be directly hired by SHYDO, to provide technical
assistance in implementation of the environment and resettlement plans and
the EMP;
• Another part-time Consultant (External Monitoring) will be hired to conduct the
external monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the EMP and
resettlement activities for the project.
106. The two Implementation Consultants (ToR in Annex 3) will carry out internal
on-the-job training and institutional capacity building for the members of the newly
appointed Environmental and Resettlement Development Cell, thus supporting
SHYDO to acquire the necessary expertise to implement EMPs and resettlement
plans by itself in future.
Table 19 Estimate for Environmental & Resettlement Specialist & Monitoring

Description Unit r Quantity vorage Estimated Amount
Rs
Environment Specialist (Package) 12
1,800,000
Environmental Monitoring & 800,000
Evaluation
Resettlement Specialist 12 qi 0 000 1,800,000
(Package)
Resettlement Monitoring & 4 00,000 800,000
Evaluation t4t
Training, Information Brochure 300,000
and Consultation Meetings
Total cost 5,500,000
Contingencies (15 %) 825,000
Total with contingencies 6,325,000 105,416,,,
VII. CONCLUSION, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
107. The IEE was conducted using the ADB screening matrix. There are no
impacts on wildlife or sites of historic or archaeological importance. The main impact
identified in this environmental examination is the potential removal of all water flow
from the 5.0 km stretch of the Ranolia Khwar during the winter months when water
flow is naturally much reduced. If the project were to be carried out by taking away all
-25-
the water flow in winter, there would be significant human and ecological impacts.
There is considerable human activity in the river valley and water is used for micro-
hydro projects to provide power to the people of Ranolia. Grain grinding water mills
use the water and it is a source of drinking water for human and livestock in the
winter months.
108. The main measure to mitigate impacts caused by the Ranolia Khwar project
is the guaranteed provision of a minimum of 500 litres/s of water flow to the river. The
foregone electricity generation is a major cost to the project. Keeping 500 litre/s of
water in the river will allow the river to continue to be used for water supply in the
winter. It will also allow the cleansing of the riverbed and negation of any harmful
effects of sewage and rubbish concentrating in the river system along the 5 km
stretch of the Ranolia Khwar.
109. There is potential for construction impacts in the steep mountain terrain and it
is important that construction activities are controlled through careful monitoring of
activities by SHYDO. Measures are included in the EMP attached to this IEE.
110. The project will have limited environmental impacts with the mitigation and
environmental management plan proposed. A full EIA is not required. It is important,
however, that SHYDO as the Implementing Agency develops its internal capacity to
implement and monitor the measures in the EMP. This has been designed into the
project by requiring the setting up of an Environmental monitoring Unit in SHYDO
and the appointment of environmental & resettlement specialists and the hiring of an
independent monitor.
-26-
Table 20 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Environmental Aspect..fif Institutional Responsibility

Remedial Measure
Potential Impact
Implementation Supervision
Design /Pre-construction Componen

Project construction & Design for maximise ratio of waste cut and fill materials. Proper planning: Measuret Design consultants SHYDO
potential loss-of property, Alignment of canal, siphon, penstock, power house and tail race to avoid tribe added in relevii & SHYDO.
agricultural & other. land dwellings and other features wherever possible Parts-of contract
uses Compensation at market rates, prior to work commencement. doctenenis—;
Excavation of cotistrikitiCii.; - Maximum use of existing quarry & borrow areas already in operation. ro*PeT.
_Planning Design consultants SHYDO
materials and development - Degraded, barren, riverbeds & wastelands to be used for borrow materials. measures tObe added I & SHYDO.
of quarries & borroW areas the relevant parts of
causing loss of alternative contract documents: .
land use
Reduced water flows and - Base line water testing to begin on quarterly basis will be undertaken at () Planning & add measure to Design consultants SHYDO
reduction in water quality I weir, (ii) between weir and Dubair River & (ii) immediately above the relevant parts of contract': & SHYDO. Water
the existing river comae, confluence of Khwar with Dubair Khwar. dOcuments:' testing at PCSIR lab
- Keep residual water flow in river to meet population needs. Peshawar.
Water diverted from,the riv Keeping adequate residual water flow in the river. Undertake base line fish &WO:undertaken by Dept
leaving reduced water survey on quarterly basis in river and catchment. Continue survey through of Fliheries; NWFP or •
impacting on fistiattivity other stages of project. Consultant
Construction stage
Earth Works for tifignscfing Slopes along upgraded access road & penstock will be provided with; Careful monitorin Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
access road. Construction of - Catchments/ cut-off drains & chutes to minimize soil erosion. Environment EPA,
weir site, siphon, penstodi - Masonry retaining structures. Engineer
on steep slopes leading to - Formation of sediment basins & slope drains.
erosion & encroachment Maximum usage of material in fill areas.
Spoil planning particularly on steep slope with bench terracing for high cut
areas &- avoidance of any pushing over of material on down slopes
Tree planting programme on canal and penstock areas.
Taking of BorrOW.Materials - No earth will be borrowed from cultivable lands. Conditions Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
with potential for loss anti,:;-` - Borrowing to take place from barren, wastelands, & riverbeds. contracts:. Careful Environment EPA
degradation of land - For new borrow areas, all measures will be taken avoid loss of productive soil. monitoring' T Engineer
- Any borrow areas will be refilled, re-vegetated & landscaped.
Taking of Quarry Materials - Quarry materials will be obtained from existing operating sites with proper Careful monitoring Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
with loss and degradation of licenses & environmental clearances. Environment EPA
land New quarries to be opened only with permission of respective authorities. Engineer
Operation of construction - Fuel storage & refuelling will have adequate containment away from water Caiefiii monitoring Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
equipment and construction bodies/channel. Equipment will be properly maintained. conditionsirithidedik, • - Environment EPA
-27-
Environmental Aspect Institutional Responsibility

Potential Impact Remedial Measure Means of Implementation
, ,, Implementation Supervision
activities and contamination - Precautions to be taken to prevent water pollution due to increased siltation & contracts Engineer
of soils, loss of water quality turbidity from weir site, siphon & road construction particularly in winter month
& water pollution ' when flows are low and water used for drinking.
- Approved sites defined for storage & disposal of wastes materials
- Any waste petroleum products will be collected, stored, & disposed of at
, approved sites as per Hazardous Waste Management Act.
Construction activities - Appropriate rain-storm-water channels will be constructed. proper planning and Design consultants SHYDO
causing disruption of existing - Provision for cross drainage structures will be made. meesurek,tobe added in & SHYDO.
surface drains; water . • - Immediate rehabilitation of damaged irrigation channels for irrigation & other theieleiard parts of ' Contractors
channels and water supply _ uses such as hydropower and water mills. contrict dotiuments. Environment
- Identify existing water pipes supplying Ranolia village. Avoid and/or realign Careful monitoring of site. Engineer
etc. No interruption of drinking water supply will take place.
Construction Camp & - The construction camp will be located away from Ranolia settlements close to Caref4,inailtoring of site Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
Residential colony. Social the powerhouse site. conditions,and • Environment EPA
impacts & pollution from- - Camps & residential colon will have properly designed sewage system for implementation of contract Engineer
wastewater & solid waste wastewater effluent and solid waste collection. conditioni.
Emission from Construction - Emission levels of all construction vehicles & equipment will conform to the Careful monitoring Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
Vehicles & Equipments, Pakistan emission standards. Environment EPA
causing air pollution . - Pollutant parameters will be monitored during construction. • Engineer
- Crushing, & concrete plants will be away from population centres at weir &
. surge tank sites
Dust particulate causing - All precautions to be taken to reduce dust level emissions from batching Careful mon
health impacts for workers plants & portable crushers at weir and penstock sites. , itoring Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
Environment EPA
and villagers: - - Regular water spraying at all mixing sites & temporary service roads will be Engineer
undertaken.
- All delivery vehicles will be covered with tarpaulin. Mixing equipment will be
sealed & equipped as per existing standards.
Construction activity Noise - All construction equipment & plants will conform to EPA NEQS noise Careful monitoring Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
from Vehides, Plant & standards. Environment EPA,
Equipment causing noise - All vehicles & equipment to be fitted with noise abatement devices.
, - Engineer
pollution - Construction workers will be provided with earplugs.
Noise pollution from BlastMg - Blasting works will be in accordance with Pakistan Explosives Act. Careful planning & Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
activities at weir and power '';- - No blasting between dusk & dawn. monitoring Environment EPA
canal route, pond ,.. , area and 'lf-- - Residents close by will be informed well in advance of blasting times. Engineer
penstock. - Workers associated with blasting sites will be provided with earplugs, helmets
____ . & other safety devices.
Construction of weir, power - No trees to be removed without prior approval of FD and trees requiring Careful monitoring o Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
canal, pond and penstock ' removal will be paint-marked. meaiurekto-be Environment EPA,
with loss of Vegetation & - Compensation for lost trees. implemented using Forestry Engineer using
Tree cover. - Plantation Programme implemented at weir site, construction platform, Department of private Forestry Department
-28-
Environmental Aspect Institutional Responsibility

Remedial Measure Means of Implementation
Potential Impact
Implementation Supervision
penstock and other elements of the project. Indigenous tree species being of sub-contractor
accorded priority over exotic species.
Work force during < - Construction workers to be educated for wildlife conservation with no hunting Contractor to enforce Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
construction causing impacts & poaching to be allowed for workers. measures included in Environment EPA
to wildlife - ' contract Engineer
Construction Activities & - All blasting sites will have warning & clearance signals. Site will be inspected Inclusion of measures in Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
Accident Risks prior/after blasting. contracts and follow up Environment EPA
- Workers will be provided helmets, masks & safety goggles etc. ,_
monitoring Engineer
- A readily available first aid unit with dressing materials etc.
- Road safety education will be given to construction vehicle drivers.
- Traffic management will be ensured during road construction periods.
- Information dissemination through banners & local announcement at mosques
about project time frame, activities causing disruption & any temporary
arrangements for public relief will take place
Construction Activities - - All public utilities likely to be impacted, such as water supply pipe system, To be added in the relevant Design consultants SHYDO
causing disruption to Public - power/phone lines etc must be relocated to suitable places, in consultations parts of contract - & SHYDO.
Utilities - ' ' with local beneficiaries. documents.
_
Operational Stage
Reduced water flow in river - Provide guaranteed winter flow of water in the Khwar Measurements Undertaken' SHYDO's SHYDO
impairing socio-economic . Regular monitoring of the quantity of daily water flows below the weir intake. by SHYDO hydrology Environment
activities of population in the - Check water usage of local people to determine if new flow regime is engineers Engineer
valley adequate and any pattern of increased usage from the river.
Erosion in river bed of Place riprap in river bed at immediate area where water discharges from During.construction phase Contractor's SC, SHYDO,
Dubair river from powerhouse to the Dubair River inipleMentation of contract Environment EPA
powerhouse discharge conditioas. ' Engineer
Low flows in river causing - Water quality sampling programme on quarterly basis of river water drinking Water testing at J:ty SHYDO's SHYDO
water quality & health water quality for parameters of WHO & GOP at (i) weir intake, (ii) intermediate laboratory in Peshawar Environment
problems , point between weir and Dubair River, & (iii) at confluence with Dubair River. Engineer
Changed pattern of water - Fish survey, with specific focus on the fish varieties, numbers, breeding period Department of Fisheries . Fisheries , SHYDO,
flows in the river causing & migration patterns. Monitoring upriver, in Khwar and below confluence with Peshawar or consultant Department
reduced fish numbers and -, Dubair River on quarterly basis during the life of the project. SHYDO's
species Environthent En r
Soil erosion, land deg Maintenance of trees and vegetative cover over initial five year of project Using b-contractor•or SHYDO's . , ,
tion & vegetation loss-- along power canal, penstock, access road and at other project infrastructure. Foresty Departthent ' Eniironment Enge
particularly on steep slopes
-29-
ANNEX 1 List Of Organizations/Persons ContactedNisited
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL

Mr. Javed Khan Gilani, Secretary Irrigation Irrigation Department, Civil Secretariat, Peshawar.
Mr. Bahadar Shah, Director Planning # 375, WAPDA House, Shahmi Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211995 +92-91-9211988
Engr: Zahid Hussain Akhtar Sabri, Deputy Director # 375, WAPDA House, Shahmi Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211995 +92-91-9211988 sabriepes.comsats.net.pk
(Electrical)
Mr. Farhat Mahmood, Deputy Director # 375, WAPDA House, Shahmi Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211995 +92-91-9211988
Mr. Habib Khan, Deputy Project Manager Malakand Ill Project, Dargai, Malakand.
Mr. Masood Pervaiz Quereshi, Superintending Mardan Irrigation Circle, Nisata Road, Mardan. +92-931-9230194
Engineer
IRRIGATION & POWER DEPARTMENT. PUNJAB
Engr: Mohammad Yaqub, Director Technical (Power) 1st Floor, Central Design Building, Old Anarkali, +92-42-9212799 +92-42-9212795
Lahore.
Mr. Liaqat lqbal, Executive Engineer (Barrage) Marala Headwork, Sialkot. +92-432-502102
+92-432-502121
Mr. Syed Sajed Hussain Rizvi, SDO (Barrage) Marala Headwork, Sialkot. +92-432-502102
WAPDA, HYRDO ELECTRIC POWER ORGANIZATION
Mr. Syed Wali Waheed, Director WAPDA Environmental Cell, # 3 Canal Bank, +92-42-6849506
Mughalpura, Lahore. +92-303-6457569
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Dr. Muhammad Bashir Khan, Director General NWFP EPA, Old Court Building, 3rd Floor, Khyber Road, +92-91-9210421 +92-91-9210280 drmbk63@hotmail.com
Peshawar. +92-91-9210263
Mr. Liaqat Ali Khan, Deputy Director NWFP EPA, Old Court Building, 3rd Floor, Khyber Road, +92-91-9210282 +92-91-9210280 Linatelahotmail.com
Peshawar. +92-91-9210148
FOREST DEPARTMENT
Mr. Ghazi Marjan Khan, Chief Conservator Forests Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar.
Mr. Hazrat Mir, Range Officer (Bahrain Range) Forest Offices, Bahrain, Upper Swat.
Mr. Shireen Zada Khan, Forest Guard Forest Offices, Utror, Upper Swat.
Mr. Muhammad Ikram Khan, DFO Nisata Road, Mardan. +931-923005
WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Abdul Faraz Khan, DFO (Wildlife) Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211479 +92-91-2561235 wildernh.paknet.com.pk
Mr. Israr Khan, RFO (Wildlife) Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211479 +92-91-2561235
Mr. Niaz A. Khan, RFO (Wildlife) Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9211479 +92-91-2561235
Mr. Amanullah Khan, RFO (Wildlife) Near Bilal Masjid, Nowshera Road, Mardan. +92-931-71823
-i-
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE FAX E-MAIL

FISHERIES DEPARTMENT
Mr. Umar Hayat Khan, Director Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar. +92-91-9212096
Mr. Abid Sohail, Assistant Director Forest Office Complex, Shami Road, Peshawar. +92-300-9202761
Mr. Chaman Gul, Fishery Watcher Bahrain, Upper Swat.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Dr. Fazal Ahad, Medical Officer Basic Health Unit, Bahrain, Upper Swat.
Dr. Khalil-ur-Rehman, Medical Officer Basic Health Unit, Dobair, Kohistan. +92-987-404138
Mr. Shamsul Haq, Veterinary Technician Veterinary Dispensary, Dobair, Kohistan.
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Mr. Muhammad Ishfaq Khan, Project Director Malakand Rural Development Project, PO Box —14, +92-936-817101-3 +92-936-817100 mrdoe.brain.net.ok
Kalam Road, Fizaghat, Mingora, Swat.
Mr. Fazal S. Khan, Program Manager (Agriculture, Malakand Rural Development Project, PO Box — 14, +92-936-817101-3 +92-936-817100 mrdoabrain.net.ok
Livestock & NRM) Kalam Road, Fizaghat, Mingora, Swat.
NGOs & CBOs
Mr. lqmail Hussain Shah, Regional Project Manager Mountain Area Conservancy Project, # 1Haji Ghamay +92-936-726530-1 +92-936-711776 mapcpiucnabrain.net.ok
Laar, Makan Bagh, Mingora, Swat.
Mr. Hameed Hasan, Coordinator Governance IUCN Sarhad Program, # 109, Street 2, Defence +92-91-5271728 +92-91-275093 Hameed.hasan@owr.iucn.or
Officers Colony, Peshawar. Q
Dr. Javed Khan, Country Leader, Snow Leopard WWF — Pakistan, # 34-D/2, SAQ Road, University +92-91-5852845-6 +92-91-5841594 Javedasnowleonard.orq
Conservation Program Town, Peshawar.
COMMUNITY MEMBERS & OTHERS
Mr. Dildar Khan, ex-Nazim Union Council Utror, Kalam, Upper Swat. +92-946-830118
Mr. Karim Khan, ex-Nazim Union Council Bahrain, Upper Swat.
Mr. Syed Altaf Hussain, District Revenue Officer District Government Office Complex, Saidu Sharif,
Swat.
HYDROPOWER
ANNEX 2 Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) Checklist
Instructions:
• This checklist is to be prepared to support the environmental classification of a project. It is to be

attached to the environmental categorization form that is to be prepared and submitted to the Chief
Compliance Officer of the Regional and Sustainable Development Department.
• This checklist is to be completed with the assistance of an Environment Specialist in a Regional

Department
• This checklist focuses on environmental issues and concerns. To ensure that social dimensions are
adequately considered, refer also to ADB checklists and handbooks on (i) involuntary resettlement, (ii)
indigenous peoples planning, (iii) poverty reduction, (iv) participation, and (v) gender and development.
• Answer the questions assuming the "without mitigation" case. The purpose is to identify potential
impacts. Use the "remarks' section to discuss any anticipated mitigation measures.
Country/Project Title: Pakistan (NWFP) / Small Hydel Power Development Project

(Ranolia Khawar)
Sector Division: South Asian Infrastructure Division
TMa 4CREENINOCQUIEST1ONV*. ea "b1444, , , = R ‘,. , 41,-, %,

A. Project Siting
Is the Project area adjacent to or within any of

the following environmentally sensitive areas?
] Cultural heritage site There are no known archaeological, cultural or religious
► heritage site located within close proximity of the project
area.
] Protected Area No protected areas have been reported within the project
/ area of environmental influence.
There are no wetlands within project area of environmental
/ influence. By virtue of being a mountainous area, there are
] Wetland
white water streams in the valley bed. Some high altitude
lakes have been reported in the Ranolia Khawar.
] Mangrove Not applicable.
] Estuarine Not applicable.
] Buffer zone of protected area Not applicable.
] Special area for protecting biodiversity No special areas for biodiversity protection are close to
/ project site.
B. Potential Environmental Impacts
Will the Project cause...
3 Loss of precious ecological values due to There are no chances of encroachment on ecological,
flooding of agricultural/forest areas, and ► agricultural or forest areas.
wild lands and wildlife habitat; destruction There a potential for negative impacts on fish spawning,
of fish spawning/breeding and nursery breeding and nursery grounds, as well as fish migration
grounds, and disruption of fish migration routes.
routes?
- % SCREENING QUESTIONS . Yes=' ,No REMARKS

3 Loss of archaeological, historical or No archaeological, historical or cultural sites/monuments
cultural monuments? ivi have been reported in the project area.
3 Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of There is potential for impacts on residences in the

people? ri powerhouse and tailrace area.
] Disruption of tribal/indigenous people? Homogeneity of tribal or indigenous people will not be

ii affected due to this project.
3 Environmental degradation from increased Minor environmental degradation may occur mainly due
pressure on land? / to construction activities - workers camps, fuel spillage,
free rolling of spoil and others.
3 Conflicts on water supply rights and Water rights conflicts may occur in winter season of
related social conflicts? I
/
► lowest water flow for operation of water-mills, livestock
use, hydropower generators and for drinking & washing
requirements.
3 Decreased production from capture There is no dam and no submersion of river stretches
fisheries due to submersion of river ii but there will be negative impacts on fish due to low
stretches and associated flood channels, flows or water stoppages in winters, which will make the
and resultant destruction of fish breeding natural river bed almost dry.
and nursery grounds?
3 Proliferation of aquatic weeds in reservoir NA as there is no dam and reservoir to the project
and downstream impairing dam discharge,
irrigation systems, navigation and
fisheries, and increasing water loss
through transpiration?
3 Scouring of riverbed below the dam? NA as no dam is constructed in this project
] Increased incidence of waterbome or There is potential for increased chances of water related
water related diseases? ► diseases with reduced river flows as there is poor
sanitation conditions and improper solid waste disposal.
Some of population living along the river and the hotels
discharge their wastewater directly into the river.
] Depletion of dissolved oxygen by large ❑ Not applicable as there is no dam or significant water
quantities of decaying plant material, fish ❑ storage capacity in the project design.
mortality due to reduced dissolved oxygen
content in water, algal blooms causing
successive and temporary eutrophication,
growth and proliferation of aquatic weeds?
1 Deterioration of water quality in the Not applicable as there is no large reservoir or water
reservoir? ❑ retention for longer than a day.
3 Decline or change in the fisheries below There will be impact on fish in the Ranolia Khwar and
dams due to reduced peak flows and X the rive system above. This will affect fish populations
floods and water quality changes? below the power house as the Ranolia Khwar is probably
used for fish breeding.
] Loss of migratory fish species due to the There is no dam. But any fish which migrate in winters,
impediment posed by the dam? 3 will have negative impacts, as there will be negligible
flow.
] Formation of sediment deposits at There is no reservoir involved and no chances of any
reservoir entrance, creating backwater !l water-logging in the steep fast flowing Khwar.
effect and flooding and water-logging
upstream?
3 Sedimentation of reservoir and loss of NA no large dam or storage facility included in the
storage capacity? project
3 Alteration of water quality due to NA no large dam or reservoir with this project
evaporation in reservoir, lowered
temperatures during low flow periods, silt
concentration in density currents, low
dissolved oxygen, and high levels of iron
-iv-
SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No - REMARKS ',,. ,

and manganese?
] Salinization of floodplain lands and Not applicable.
saltwater intrusion in estuary and ❑ ■
upstream?
3 Decrease in floodplain agriculture? ❑ Not applicable.
3 Introduction or increase in incidence of Incidence of water-related diseases are likely to increase

waterborne or water-related diseases? ri in the winter period of low water flow.
Some of the population living on the river banks and the
hotels discharge their wastewater directly into the river,
without any treatment.
] Environmental problems arising from The improvement of access and the introduction of
uncontrolled human migration into the ill electric power to the area may contribute some in-
area, made possible by access roads and migration on a small scale.
transmission lines?
-v-
ANNEX 3 Terms of Reference for ESDC Staff and External Specialists
A. Terms of Reference for SHYDO/ ESDC Environment Engineer
Specific Job Description
• Responsible on behalf of SHYDO for ensuring the implementation of the IEE and EMP.
• Facilitate SHYDO and the design/supervision consultants in the site-specific
environmental issues to ensure the least damages and disturbances to the natural
environment and social values of the local residents.
• Examine, evaluate and advise persons in adopting suitable, cost-effective, socio-
cultural, socially sensitive, and sound engineering project design, where the local
residents receive the least disturbance.
• Conduct a cross checking and vetting of design/specification, tender, and contract
documents, making them suitably orientated towards the environmental and sound
engineering needs for the successful site selection, construction, and post-completion
operation and maintenance of the project in an environment friendly manner.
• Recommend revision of Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans to PMU so
that the proposed mitigation measures are properly implemented in a cost effective
manner.
• Ensure water testing on regular basis, note any changes and adopt suitable measures,
accordingly and analyse results and make recommendations to SHYDO if there is
deterioration in water quality.
• Supervise implementation of water quality testing and fish monitoring programmes.
• Provide information as necessary to external consultants.
• Ensure environmental conditions included in contracts are fulfilled by contractors.
• Establish regular contacts and on-going liaison with EPA, Forest, Wildlife and Fisheries
Departments, local/regional NGOs, local officials, and all other stakeholders connected
with the project related environmental issues.
• Collect environment related ecological/social data/information, make computer data
entries, carry out the analysis and apply the results.
• Liaison between SHYDO and the GoNWFP, particularly the Environmental Protection
Agency Peshawar who must receive 6 monthly reports on compliance with the EMP.
Qualifications
The ESDC Environmental Engineer is required to at least, to hold a Bachelor's degree and five
years work experience in road engineering or as an environmental engineer on construction
projects
-vi-
B. Job Description — SHYDO/ ESDC Resettlement Officer Social Scientist
Specific Tasks
• Conduct a crosschecking and vetting of specification conflicts, tender, and contract

documents, making them suitably orientated towards the social needs of the residents in
the area of project operations.
• Make the specification document congruent in the proposed social mitigation measures,
so that it is congruent to all other project related planning.
• Conduct vigilant monitoring of the implementation of the Resettlement Plans and Land
Compensation Activities so that the affected persons and communities are paid their due
share of compensation in a timely manner well before the commencement of
construction work.
• Supervise SHYDO/PMU, consultants and the contractor in adherence to the resettlement
plan as per their respective obligations.
• Maintain an on-going intra-departmental and inter-departmental liaison and coordination
with all concerned.
• Establish regular contacts with EPA, Forest, Wildlife, and Fisheries Departments,
local/regional NGOs, local officials, and all other stakeholders connected with the project-
related social and environmental issues.
• Supervise the collection of socio-environment data/information, supervise computer data
Qualifications
The ESDC Social Scientist/Resettlement Specialist is required to hold a Master's degree in

social sciences and five years work experience in an organization such as Local Government
and Rural Development Department or any other development project.
ToR for this person is taken from the Resettlement Report for the Project
-v11-
Terms of Reference for SHYDO/ESDC External Specialists
A. Terms of Reference SHYDO/ESDC External Specialist Environmental Engineer
As an integral part of Environmental Cell of SHYDO, the Environmental Engineer is required

to discharge maximum engineering application responsibilities. He is required, at least, to hold
a Bachelor's degree and five years work experience in road engineering. Job activities for this
officer will consist of the following responsibilities:
• Facilitate SHYDO and the design/supervision consultants in the site-specific

environmental issues in a manner which is entailing the least damages and
disturbances to the natural environment and social values of the local residents.
• Examine, evaluate and advise persons in adopting suitable, cost-effective, socio-
cultural, socially sensitive, and sound engineering project design, where the local
residents receive the least disturbance.
• Conduct a cross checking and vetting of design/specification, tender, and contract
documents, making them suitably orientated towards the environmental and sound
engineering needs for the successful site selection, construction, and post-completion
operation and maintenance of the project in an environment friendly manner.
• Make the specification document congruent in the proposed social and vegetative
mitigation measures for the entire project, adopting a holistic approach and
methodology.
• Conduct Environmental Management and Monitoring Plans so that the proposed
mitigation measures are being implemented in a cost effective manner.
• Ensure that EMP is implemented in letter and sprits, if warranted, make suitable
adjustments.
• Ensure water testing on regular basis, note any changes and adopt suitable measures,
accordingly.
• Facilitate SHYDO, appointed consultants and contractors in adopting the environmental
plans as per their contract deeds.
• Maintain adequate liaison and coordination with other environmental staff persons.
• Establish regular contacts and on-going liaison with EPA, Forest, Wildlife and Fisheries
Departments, local/regional NGOs, local officials, and all other stakeholders connected
with the project related environmental issues.
• Collect environment related ecological/social data/information, make computer data
• Act as an advisor to SHYDO, the parent department, and the GoNWFP, who must be
kept apprised for the then prevalent site-specific environmental issues, if any.
B. Terms of Reference for SHYDO/ESDC External Resettlement Specialist
The external Consultant for Resettlement will support SHYDO/PMU and ESDC in implementing
the Resettlement Plan. He/she is an advisor to SHYDO/PMU/ESDC and controls the
implementation of the Resettlement Plan as agreed upon between the concerned parties. This
covers but is not limited to the following activities:
• Design and produce an information brochure in Urdu to be used for Information/

disclosure to the Affected Persons.
• Support SHYDO/ESDC in finally measuring the permanently and temporarily required
land at the project site.
• Ensure that the required official request for land acquisition to District Revenue Officer
Kohistan, FMU is followed up by SHYDO/PMU.
• Conduct consultation meetings regularly with Affected Persons on resettlement matters
and provide all necessary information related to their entitlements, necessary legal
documentation, and procedures of payments, and estimated payment schedules,
finalize entitlement packages for individual Affected Persons as per the entitlement
matrix and also assist them in receiving payments
• Monitor all land acquisition and resettlement related activities and prepare progress
reports on behalf of PMU/ESDC highlighting monthly progress in all areas as well as
implementation issues/constraints that require decisions by SHYDO/PMU and other
agencies involved.
• Ensure the information, consultation and participation of the affected people and the
Ranolia and Dubair communities, so that the socio-cultural and socio-economic site
specific issues are integrated in the Resettlement Plan implementation.
• Supervise the integration of the different agreed upon alterations in the project design to
mitigate resettlement effects and minimize them.
• Examine, evaluate and advise SHYDO/PMU/ESDC in adopting a suitable, cost-
effective, socio-cultural and socially sensitive final project design, where the local
residents of Ranolia receive the least disturbance in resettlement.
• Inform the concerned parties regularly about the RP implementation progress and
mention bottlenecks in order to avoid time delay.
• Supervise compensation payments to affected people and community.
• Support ESDC in creating and organising the RAC and GRC. Inform the committees
about their tasks.
• Organize with SHYDO/ESDC a workshop on ADB policies and guidelines concerning
Involuntary Resettlement and the implementation procedures of a RP.
• Act as an advisor to SHYDO/PMU/EDSDC in all resettlement associated questions.
ANNEX 4 Photos of Ranolia Project Site
Existing access road on right bank of th=

Khwar and maize field (MR).
Maize grinding mill in operation (DR).
'$1
Ranolia river close to confluence with Dube

river MR .
-x-
The Government of Switzerland, Directorate for Development
Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid (SDC)
The Government of the North West Frontier Province (Pakistan),

Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO)
PAK - SWISS SMALL HYDEL PROGRAMM7:.
Ranolia Small Hydropower Project
Feasibility Study
Annexes
Affoltern a/A, April 1994

ITECO AG
P.O. Box, CH-8910 Affoltorn a/A, Switzerland jiW: I
Telephone 01/761 17 45, Telex 827 254 ITEC CH, Fax 01/761 17 20
I I l
ir■V4Ir:s J.
in collaboration with:
DESIGNMEN Consulting Eng. (Pvt.) Ltd.

1st Floor, 9-West, Jinnah Avenue, F-6
Islamabad, Pakistan
PSSHP/DBLAAN.doc
DESIGNMEN
ANNEXES
1.1 Ranolia, Plan View and Location Map
1.2 Salient Features of the Project
3.1 Location of Relevant Load Centres
3.2 Compilation of Hypothetical Energy Production Data at Generator

Terminals [MWh]
5.1 Present Water Requirements along Ranolia-Khwar
7.1 Ranolia-River Gauge: Stage - Discharge Curve
7.2 Hydrographs and Flow Duration Curves of the Years 1990; 1991; 1992;
Period Oct. 1989 - Dec. 1992
8.1 Project Implementation Programme
9.1 List of Labour Rates
9.2 List of Construction Material Rates
9.3 Rate Analysis of Items of Work
9.4 Summary Sheet of Analysed Rates
9.5 Bill of Quantities; Cost Estimates
9.6 Summary Sheet of Cost Estimates
9.7 Detailed Consultancy Costs (Item 22)

10.1 Completion Costs
10.2 Rehabilitation Costs
10.3 Annual Recurring Costs
10.4 Economic Calculations
10.4.1 Economic break-even unit cost of Ranolia

10.4.2 Production cost of Ranolia
10.5 LRMC Valued Equivalent Production Costs
10.6 Thermal Equivalent Production Costs
10.7 Sensitivity Calculations
10.7.1 Break-even production costs;- 10% construction costs

10.7.2 Break-even production costs;+10% construction costs
10.7.3 Break-even production costs;- 10% annual recurring costs
10.7.4 Break-even production costs;+10% annual recurring costs
10.7.5 Break-even production costs; 12% local capital interest
7% foreign capital interest
12% return on equity
10.7.6 Break-even production costs; 16% local capital interest
9% foreign capital interest
16% return on equity
10.7.7 Break-even production costs; loan life: 15 years
10.8 ECONOMIC INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

FINANCIAL INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN
10.8.1 Summary of Economic Costs

10.8.2 EIRR - on Thermal Equivalent Costs at Rs. 1.43/kWh
10.8.3 EIRR - on WAPDA - LRMC at Rs. 1.43/kWh
10.8.5 Tariff calculations as per Private Sector Power Generation Policy
10.8.6 FIRR based on tariff calculations in Annex 10.8.5
1.1 Ranolia, Plan View and Location Map
—.0
8 i E-I
.71
‘00 diversion weir

intake, graveltrap, sandtrap Ranolia
.,,
"Ca access road —\ /
,,,,' ... .... .

./ CD
L.; • ,- p
e nstock
• „.--._ /
•-•
1
headrace channel ( upper ) I

j(
I )
,1
•
dew uopeool
syphon inlet
r\\\
\1).4\\
\ ^73 power house
_- forebay
access road
---//
./ spillway
J,71
• lows, channel 1PM I
- 4.i4v •
pressure pipe
I- X9NNV
pipe bridge /
bridge
syphon —'
L headrace channel ( lower ) 2"3"'E road existing
3 a:c
I:
---- road poposed
syphon outlet
--/
1.2 Salient Features of the Project

ANNEX 12
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT
GENERAL
1 - Name of the Project RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER

PROJECT
2 - District KOH ISTAN, N.W.F.P.
3 - Location Power house located in Dubair Bazaar
4 - Type of Power Plant Run-of-River
5 - Total installed capacity 11.5 MW
6 -Average annual energy production 64.3 GWh
(at 33 kV busbar)
HYDROLOGY
1 - Catchment Area 73 km2

2 - Peak flood discharge (100 year) at weir site 146 m3/s
3 - Design Discharge for power canal 3.5 m3/s
DIVERSION WEIR AN INTAKE
1 - Type Lateral intake

2 - Water way on weir 20.0 meters
3 - Designed H.F.L. (100 year flood) at the weir R.L. 1123.3
4 - Weir crest level (spill section) R.L. 1'120.5
5 - Intake crest level R.L. 1'119.0
6 - Flushing bay crest level R.L. 1'118.0
7 - Intake width 2.6 m
8 - Design peak discharge 146 m3/s
GRAVEL TRAP (single chamber)
1 - Length 10m
2 - Width x depth 2.6 x 3.0 m
3 - Particle size to be eliminated 2.0 mm and above
4 - Velocity in the chamber 0.51 m/s
SAND TRAP (two chambers)
1 - Length 25 m
2 - Width x depth (each chamber) 3.0 x 3.6
3 - Particle size to be eliminated 0.2 mm and above
4 - Velocity in the chamber 0.195 m/s
TAILRACE
No tailrace needed as the water from the after bay outfalls directly into Duber Khwar.
1 - F.S.L in after bay R.L. 707.5

2 - Min W.L in Duber River R.L. 701.0
3 - NFL (100 year) in Duber River R.L. 704.5
4 - Design fall 6.5 m
SUBSTATION / SWITCHYARD
1 - Electrical output 6.6 kV - 50 Hz - AC - 3 Phase

2 - Main bus bar voltage 33 kV
3 - Transformers i) 6.6 / 33 kV-2 No.
For transmission
ii) 6.6 / 0.4 kV-1 No.
For station use
COST ESTIMATES
1 -Total Project Cost (end of 1993) local currency: 233.7 Mill. Rs

foreign currency: 3.449 Mill. US$
2 -Completion Cost by end of 1997 local currency: 446.9 Mill. Rs

(including escalation, interest during (foreign component converted and
construction (IDC) for period 1994 -1996 included in this figure)
and general pre-operational expenses)
3 -Retention money due per end of 1998 local currency: 61.2 Mill. Rs
plus IDC attracted in 1997 (foreign component converted and
included in this figure)
4 - Capital Cost / KW installed 1'192 US$ / kW
5 -Production Cost per (kWh) generated 1.26 Rs / kWh
PSSHP/BERICHT/RANANEX.doc
3.1 Location of Relevant Load Centres
t ,
ANNEX 3.1
DASU
to Mingora
‘P,l1 LOAD CENTRE to Abbottabad

0 Besham
10 Ranoha
0 Patan
(Source SHYDO/GtZ)
3.2 Compilation of Hypothetical Energy
Production Data at Generator
Terminals [MWH]
hes
ANNEX 3.2
COMPILATION OF HYPOTHETICAL ENERGY PRODUCTION DATA AT GENERATOR

TERMINALS [MWh]
Month Year Average
1989 1990 1991 1992

January 2'143 3'820 2'491 2'818
February 3'158 4'612 4'940 4'237
March 5'939 5'909 6'826 6'225
April 7'529 8'257 7'303 7'696
May 8'554 8'555 7'802 8'304
June 8'279 8'279 5'113 7'224
July 8'555 8'539 5'459 7'518
August 8'555 8'526 5'304 7'462
September 6'262 8'188 5'595 6'682
October 1'852 1'091 8'465 5'142 4'138
November 2'084 1'819 3'450 3'041 2'599
December 1'971 1'856 2'274 1'943 2'011
Year --- 63'738 78'875 60'957 66'914
PSSHP/BERICFITE/RANANEX doc
LL
UAW
Ea/
5.1 Present Water Requirements along

Ranolia-Khwar
-s■
an/
,no
km,
ANNEX 5.1
PRESENT WATER REQUIREMENTS ALONG RANOLIA KHWAR
Irrigation canals 0 [Vs] Mills 0 [I/s1
C1 29 M1, M2 85
C2 43 M3, M4, M5, M6 85
C3 29 M7, M8 60
C4 29 M9 45
C5 57 M10 60
C6 29 M11 60
C7 29 M12, M13, M14, M15 60
C8 29 M16 60
C9 29 M17 60
010 29
C11 29
C12 29
Total 390
NB: Required only during the months NB: Required throughout the year
June to October
Source: SHYDO, January 1993
PSSHP/BERICHTE/RANANEX.doc
31 31
31 El 31 9
F
diversion weir —0— —H- rail track S.=

CDC
intake, graveltrap, sandtrap channel
= pressure pipe
bridge
/4
5'00 i road existing
,m1 0.•
road proposed
c-
Ma Flour mill access road
C-2 e Irrigation Intake
5 OM
,11
• /
penstock
..?
C-2
/
headrace channel ( upper )
syphon inlet
6
L. power house
forebay
ILjcO
access road
spillway
C-5 "r
Lox
pipe bridge
syphon —/
headrace channel ( lower )
()8O
syphon outlet
1
7.1 Ranolia-River Gauge;

Stage - Discharge Curve
tad
Ity•
Ranolia river gauge
Stage discharge curve
140
130
120
110
Gauge height [cm]
100
90
80
70
60
50
40 -fit
30
20
10
VL X3NNV
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
(Thousands)
Discharge [1/s]
7.2 Hydrographs and Flow Duration
dor
Curves of the Year 19901 1991, 1992
Period Oct. 1989 - Dec. 1992
*NI
Woo
Hydrograph Ranolla River
Year : 1 990
10
Discharge Q [Vs]
(Thousan ds)
-\^----,./v
I F I r 1 I I
01-Jan-90 01-Mar-90 1 01-May-90 1 01-Jul-90 01-Sep-90 1 01-Nov-90 31-Dec-90
01-Feb-90 01-Apr-90 01-Jun-90 01-Aug-90 01-Oct-90 01-Dec-90
Date
Hydrograph Ranolia River
Year: 1992
Discharge Q [1/s]
1\z-Ai .......--•-■
.^......___,-....
."..----.
,,i--
I I I i I i I
01-Jan-92 01-Mar-92 01-May-92 01-Jul-92 01-Sep-92 01-Nov-92 31-Dec-92
01-Feb-92 01-Apr-92 01-Jun-92 01-Aug-92 01-Oct-92 01-Dec-92
Date
Flow Duration Curvo Ranoila River
Year: 1992
14
13
12
i
11
10
Disc harge a (1/sj
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
,
2
1
O
0 200 400
Number of days exceeded
0120 = 2,566 Vs
0240 = 2,373 Vs
Q366 = 654 Vs
Flow Duration Curve Ranolla River
Year: 1992
14
13
12
11
10
9
(Thousands)
0 a
o
o) 7
cii
L 6
a'
5 5
4
3
2
1 ,
0 200 400
Total river flow I— Available flow

FL Dur. Curve Ranolia river / 0 turb.
Period Oct.1989 - Dec. 1992

14
13
12
11
10
Discharge [ I/s]
(T housands)
9
a-
7-
6-
5-
4-
3-
2
1
i
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of time exceeded
Total river flow L Available flow
Energy Duration Curve Ranolia SHP

Period Oct.1989 - Dec. 1992
300
250
Energy ( MWhiday ]
200
150
100
50
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of time exceeded
Flow Duration Curve Ranolia River
Year : 1990
9.0
8.0
7.0
8.0
D is c harg e 0 ( Us)
( Tho us a n ds)
50
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 200 400
0120 = 5.249 Vs
0240 = 1.382 VS
0365 = 437 Vs
Flow Duration Cures Ranolia River
Year :1990
9.0
8.0
7.0
Dis c ha rg e 0 ) Us)
8.0
( Thous a n ds )
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0 200 400
Total river flow Available flow

Hydrograph Ranolla River
Year : 1991
10
7
Discharge Q [I/s)
(Thousands)
\_ r \
4 `,,,,---,_.
3 \
2
0 I , I I I I ,
01-Jan-91 1 01-Mar-91 01-May-91 01-Jul-91 01-Sep-91 01-Nov-91 31-Dec-91
01-Feb-91 01-Apr-91 01-Jun-91 01 -Aug-91 01-Oct-91 01-Dec-91
Date
8.1 Project Implementation Programme
UAW
bras,
PROJECT IMPLEME? TATION PROGRAMME .15
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PF OJECT
MONTHS / YEARS
1996
1995
_. . _ __ S 0 N D
s.w.o S 0 N J Mj A M J JI A
No JOB AM J J A _ - •
1 Final Location Survey --

-
2 Mrbillzatlon -
3 Construction of Bridges
(I) Dobalr & Ranolia
(ii) Creek U/S Ranolia
4 Road Ext. & Improvement 1
5 Ctuames Operation
6 Laying Ralltrack
(I) 1 Syphon Site
(0 Penstock Site
7 Consiuctic; of Weir
8 Gravel / Sand Traps
9 Power Canal
10 Laying of Syphon Pipe, ._
--
Penstock Surge Bay .
11 Construction Power House
12 Switchyard 1
13
3 ResIder11fai&—ony
14 Equipment Installation
15 Commissioning
1-'8 X3NNV
as,
9.1 List of Labour Rates

ra,
6.0
WO'
ANNEX 9.1
LIST OF LABOUR RATES
DESCRIPTION UNIT RATE (RS)

S. No.
1. Beldars nos. 80
2. Coolies nos. 65
3. Bhisty with Mashak nos. 90
Excavators nos. 90
4.
5. Breakers nos. 90
Hole Drillers nos. 90

6.
7. Mason (2nd class) for stone work nos. 120
Mason (2nd class) for concrete work nos. 120

8.
9. Concrete lifter nos. 80
10. Concrete filler nos. 90
11. Mistry nos. 150
12. Stone Chisler nos. 110
13. Mate nos. 120
14. Mason (1st class) for stone work nos. 160
15. Stone Chisler nos. 120
16. Black Smith (2nd class) nos. 120
17. Chowkidar nos. 75
PSSHP/BERICHTE/RANANEX.doc
.me
no,
9.2 List of Construction Material Rates
ley
ANNEX 9.2
LIST OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT RATES
S. No. DESCRIPTION UNIT RATE TRANSPORT TOTAL REMARKS

(RS) RATE (RS) RATE (RS)
1. Cement kg 3.20 0.30 3.50 The rate of cement is
taken as prevailing in
Islamabad & transportation
by truck is added to it.
2. Sand cft. 3.50 1.00 4.50 The sand & aggregate is
available at Mera. a place
about 50 km from site
therefore cartage is also
added.
3. Screened cft. 3.50 1.00 4.50
graded Bajri or
crushed
aggregate
4. Reinforcing steel kg 13.00 0.30 13.30
(Grade 40)
5. Bitumen kg 8.50 0.30 8.80
6. Blasting powder lbs. 35.50 --- 35.50 Cartage is inclusive in the
and dynamite rate for item 6 - 8
7. Fuse with ft. 2.25 --- 2.25
cartridge
8. Detonators nos. 8.75 --- 8.75
9. Building stone of cft. 2.00 --- 2.00 Available at site
large size 35
headers
10. Building stone of cft. 1.75 --- 1.75 "
large size 20
headers
11. Building stone of cft. 1.50 --- 1.50 "
sizes (ordinary)
12. Bricks nos. 1.20 0.60 1 80
13. Wire netting sft. 8.00 --- 8.00 For gabion wall (cartage
(hexagonal) included in rate)
20 gauge
14. Cement Mortar ctf. 30.00 --- 30.00
(1 : 6)
15. Cement Mortar ctf. 45.00 --- 45.00
(1 : 3)
16. Concrete mixer per 1'500 00 --- 1'500.00 The rates of item 16. 17
with driver & fuel day include transportation of
the equipment to the site
17. 5 HP pump per 800.00 --- 800.00
including fuel & day
driver
PSSHP/BERICHTE/RANANEX doc
9.3 Rate Analysis of Items of Work
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C 1123W1DATA1PSSHMANFEAS\F_XC WK3
ANNEX 9.3
EXCAVATION AND FILLING
ANALYSED RATE OF ITEM
1. Excavation for trimming, Unit: 100 Cft.

cutting and removal of
top soil upto maximum 6
inches including disposal
to indicated places and
stacking for reuse, lead
upto one chain and lift
upto 15 ft.
DETAILS OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency. Pak. Rs.
Description Unit Quantity Rate Amount
A. MATERIAL 0.00
Total Material Component 0.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 4.00 80.00 320.00

Coolies Nos. 4.00 65.00 260.00
Bhishty Nos. 0.10 90.00 9.00
Sundries L.S 25.00
Total Labour Component 614.00
Total A+B 614.00
Add 1.5% water charges 9.21

Add 10% contractors profit 61.40
Add 12% overheads 73.68
Total 758.29
Add 3% income tax 22.75
Grand Total 781.04
Total cost for 1000 Cft. 781.04

Cost for 100 Cft. 78.10
Cost for 1.0 Cum. 27.58
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT
2. Excavation for foundation, Unit: 100 Cft.

trenches and canal in wet
silt clay or Mud including
dressing to required shape
and slope and disposal
of surplus excavated stuff
as directed, including stacking
with compaction by ramming at
indicated places, lead upto
one chain and lift upto 15 ft.
DETAIL OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency: Pak Rs.
A. MATERIAL: 0.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 9.00 80.00 720.00

Coolies Nos. 7.00 65.00 455.00
Bhishty Nos. 0.13 90.00 11.25
Sundries L.S 100.00
Total A+B 1286.25

Total 1588.52
Grand Total 1636.17

5. Excavation for foundation, Unit. 100 Cft.

trenches and canal in hard
rock by blasting including
dressing to required shape
and slope and disposal sur-
plus excavated stuff as
directed, including stacking
with compaction by ramming
of serviceable and unservice-
able material seperately at
indicated places, lead upto
one chain lift upto 15 ft.
DETAILS OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency: Pak. Rs.
A. MATERIAL:
Blasting Powder and

dynamite lbs. 24.00 35.50 852.00
Fuse with Cartidge ft. 240.00 2.25 540.00
Detonator Nos. 12.00 8.75 105.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 4.00 80.00 320.00

Coolies Nos. 6.00 65.00 390.00
Excavators Nos. 5.00 90.00 450.00
Breakers Nos. 10.00 90.00 900.00
Hole Drillers Nos. 5.00 90.00 450.00
Sundries L.S. 100.00
Total A+B 4107.00

Add 10% contractor's profit 410.70
Total 5072.15
Grand Total 5224.31

6. Supply earth from approved Unit: 100 Cft.

site within the area
including digging or cutting
loading, unloading and filling
in foundation, trenches, or
under floor etc. including
breaking clods, dressing,
watering & consolidation by
ramming in layers not exceeding
9 inches in depth to full
compaction within a lead of
one chain and lift of 15 ft.
as directed by the Engineer
Incharge.
DETAIL OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency Pak. Rs.
A. MATERIAL: 0.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 6.50 80.00 520.00

Coolies Nos. 6.00 65.00 390.00
Bhishty Nos. 0.17 90.00 15.00
Sundries L.S. 25.00
Total A+B 950.00

Total 1173.25
Grand Total 1208.45

Cost for 1.0 Cum.
42.67
1
7. Filling sand available Unit: 100 Cft.

at site in foundation,
trenches or under floor
etc. to a required slope
including dressing,
watering, consolidation
by ramming in layers not
exceeding 9 inches in
depth to full compaction
complete within a lead
of one chain and lift of
15 ft.
A. MATERIAL:
Supplying sand and

stacking sand at site cft 1000.00 4 50 4500.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 2.25 80 00 180.00

Coolies Nos. 4.25 65.00 276.25
Bhishty Nos. 0.17 90.00 15.00
Sundries L.S. 25.00
Total A+B 4996.25

Total 6170.37
Grand Total 6355.48

8. Filling bajn available at site Unit: 100 Cft.

in foundation, trenches or under
floor etc. including dressing
watering, consolidation by ramming
in layers not exceeding 9 inches
in depth to full compaction
complete within a lead of
one chain and lift of 5 ft.
A MATERIAL:
Supplying screened bajri

and stacking at site. cft 1000.00 4 50 4500.00
B. LABOUR:
Beldars Nos. 2.25 80.00 180.00

Coolies Nos. 4.25 65.00 276.25
Bhishty Nos. 0.17 90.00 15.00
Sundries L.S. 25.00
Total Labour Component
496.25
Total A+B
4996.25
Add 1.5% water charges

74.94
Add 10% contractors profit
499.63
Add 12% overheads
599.55
Total
6170.37
Add 3% income tax
185.11
Grand Total
6355.48
Total cost for 1000 Cft.

6355.48
Cost for 100 Cft.
635.55
Cost for 1.0 Cum.
224.41
9. Add for additional lift Unit. 100 Cft.

of every three feet or part
thereof in item Nos 1 - 5.
DETAILS OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency Pak. Rs.
A MATERIAL: 0.00
B. LABOUR:
Coolies Nos. 2.50 65.00 162.50
Total A+B 162.50

Total 200.69
Grand Total 206.71

10. Add for additional lead Unit: 100 Cft

of every one chain or part
thereof in item Nos. 1 - 5.
DETAILS OF COST FOR 1000 CFT. Currency Pak. Rs.
Description Unit Quantit Rate Amount
A. MATERIAL: 0.00
B. LABOUR:
Coolies Nos 2 50 65.00 162.50
Total A+B 162.50

Total 200.69
Grand Total 206.71

11. Extra for additional lift Unit: 100 CFT.

of every three ft. or part
thereof in item Nos. 6 & 8.
A. MATERIAL:
0.00

B. LABOUR:
Coolies Nos. 2.13 65.00 138 45

138.45
Total A+B
138.45
2.08
13.85
Add 12% overheads
16.61
Total
170.99
Add 3% income tax
5.13
Grand Total
176.12

176.12
Cost for 100 Cit.
17.61
Cost for 1.0 Cum.
6.22
12. Extra for additional lead Unit: 100 Cft.

of every one chain or part
thereof in item Nos. 6 & 8.
Description Unit Quantity Rate I Amount

A. MATERIAL:
0.00
Total Material Component

0.00
B. LABOUR:
Coolies Nos. 2.13 65.00 j 138.45

138.45
Total A+B
138.45

Total 16.61
5.13
Grand Total
176.12

6.22
13. Bailing or pumping out Unit: 100 Cft.

sub-soil water during
excavation or concreting,
cast in situ concrete or
masonary work in foundation
etc. (only three operations
to be allowed, trench volume
under water to be measured
first time for excavation
second time for concreting, &
third time for cast in situ
concrete or masonary work in
foundation etc.).
A. MATERIAL:
0.00

0.00
B. LABOUR:
Chowkidar Nos. 1.00 75.00 75.00

75.00
C. EQUIPMENT:
Hire charges of 5 H.P.

Pump(including pump man,
petrol mobile oil,
grease and cotton waste etc). Nos. 1.00 800.00 800.00
Total Equipment Component
800.00
Total MB
875.00

13.13
87.50
Add 12% overheads
105.00
Total
1080 63
Add 3% income tax
32 42
Grand Total
1113.04

1113.04
Cost for 100 Cft.
222.61
Cost for 1.0 Cum.
78.60
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C S123W\DATAPSSHRRANFEASlSTONE WK3
STONE MASONRY
14. Providing and laying coursed Unit: 100 Cft.

rubble masonary in cement
mortar 1:3 in foundation
plinth and super-structure
including scaffolding curing
etc. complete.
Detail of cost for 100 cft. Currency: Pak. Rs.
Description of Item Quantity Unit Rate Amount
A. MATERIAL:
Building stone of large

size (ordinary) for
35 headers or through
stone 35.00 Cft. 2.00 70.00
Building stones of sizes

(ordinary) at site 135.00 Cft. 1.50 202.50
Cement mortar (1:3) 30.00 Cft. 45.00 1350.00
B. LABOUR:
Mason (1st class) 5.50 Nos. 160.00 880.00

Stone chisler 5.00 Nos. 120.00 600.00
Beldar 5.00 Nos. 80.00 400.00
Coolies 4.00 Nos. 65.00 260.00
Bhishty 1.00 Nos. 90.00 90.00
Mistry 0.13 Nos. 150.00 18.75
Extra for lead & lift L.S. 100.00
C: EQUIPMENT & MISCELANIOUS
Scaffolding and Sundries L.S 125.00
Total Equipment & Miscelanious Component 125.00
Total (A + B + C) 4096.25

Total 5058.87
Total Item rate for 100 Cft. 5210.63
Total cost for 1.0 Cum. 1839.88

15. Providing and laying uncorsed Unit: 100 Cft.

rubble masonary in cement
mortar 1:3 in foundation
plinth and superstructure
including scaffolding curing .
etc. coplete in all respects

A. MATERIAL:
Rubble stone of large

size for 20 headers or
through stone having
least face area of half
square foot and least
length of 2 ft. 25.00 Cft. 1.75 43.75
Building stone large size
(ordinary) 45.00 Cft. 1.75 78.75
Building stone small
size (ordinary) 55.00 Cft. 1.50 82.50
B. LABOUR:
Mason (2nd class) 3.00 Nos. 120.00 360.00

Beldar 3.00 Nos. 80.00 240.00
Coolies 1.00 Nos. 65.00 65.00
Bhishty 1.00 Nos. 90.00 90.00
Mistry 0.13 Nos. 150.00 18.75
Extra for lead & lift. L.S. 100.00
C. EQUIPMENT & MISCELANIOUS:
Scaffolding and Sundries LS 125.00

Total (A + B + C) 3078.75

Total 3802.26
16. Providing and laying coursed Unit: 100 Cft.

rubble masonary in
cement mortar 1:6 in foundation
plinth and super-structure
including scaffolding curing etc.
complete.

A. MATERIAL:

size (ordinary) for
35 headers or through
stone 35.00 Cft. 2.00 70.00
B. LABOUR:
Mason (1st class) 5.50 Nos. 160.00 880.00

Beldar 5.00 Nos. 80.00 400.00
Coolies 4.00 Nos. 65.00 260.00
Bhishty 1.00 Nos. 90.00 90.00
Mistry 0.13 Nos. 150.00 18.75
Extra for lead & lift. L.S. 100.00
C: EQUIPMENT & MISCELANIOUS
Scaffolding and Sundries L.S 125.00

Total (A + B + C)
3646.25

Total
4503.12
Add 3% income tax 135 09
Total cost for 1.0 Cum.
1637.75
17. Providing and laying Unit: 100 Cft.

uncoursed rubble masonary in
cement mortar 1:6 in founda-
tion plinth and superstructure
including and scaffolding
curing etc. complete in all
respect
Detail of cost for 100 cit. Currency: Pak. Rs.
Description of Item Quantit Unit Rate Amount

A. MATERIAL:
Rubble stone of large

size for 20 headers or
through stone having
least face area of half
square foot and least
length of 2 ft. 25.00 Cft. 1.75 43.75
Building stone large size
(ordinary) 45.00 Cft. 1.75 78.75
Building stone small
size (ordinary) 55.00 Cft. 1.50 82.50
1405.00
B LABOUR:

Beldar 3.00 Nos. 80.00 240.00
Coolies 1.00 Nos. 65.00 65.00
Bhishty 1.00 Nos. 90.00 90.00
Mistry 0.13 Nos. 150.00 18.75
Extra for lead & lift
L.S. 100.00
948.75
Scaffolding and Sundries

L.S 125.00
Total Equipment & Miscelanious Component
125 00
Total (A + [3 + C)
2478.75
37.18
Add 10% contractor's profit
247.88
Add 12% overheads
Total 297.45
3061.26
Add 3% income tax
91 84
Total Item rate for 100 Cft.
3153.09
1113.36
18. Providing and laying dry Unit: 100 Cft.

uncoursed rubble masonry in
retaining or compound wall etc.
including scaffolding etc. complete.
Detail of cost for 100 cit. Currency: Pak. Rs.

A. MATERIAL:

size (ordinary) for 35
headers or through stone 40.00 Cft. 2.00 80.00
282.50
B. LABOUR:
Mason (2nd class for

stone work 4.00 Nos. 120.00 480.00
Beldar 2.50 Nos. 80.00 200.00
Coolies 2.00 Nos. 65.00 130.00
Stone Chiseller 0.75 Nos. 120.00 90.00
900.00

L.S. 125.00
125.00
Total (A + B + C)
1307.50
19.61
Total 156.90
1614.76
Add 3% income tax
48.44
1663.21
587.28
19. Providing and laying Unit: 100 Cft.

gabion wall with wire
netting including scaffolding
etc. complete.

A. MATERIAL:

size (ordinary) for 35
header or through stone 40.00 Cft. 2.00 80.00
Wire netting (hexagonal)
20 gauge. 240.00 Sft. 8.50 2040.00
2322.50
B. LABOUR:
Mason (2nd class for

stone work 4.00 Nos. 120.00 480.00
Beldar 2.50 Nos. 80.00 200.00
Coolies 2.00 Nos. 65.00 130.00
Stone Chiseller 0.75 Nos. 120.00 90.00
Extra for lead and lift L.S. 100.00
1000.00
scaffolding and Sundries L.S. 125.00

125.00
Total (A + B + C)
3447.50
51.71
344.75
Add 12% overheads
413.70
Total
4257.66
Add 3% income tax
127.73
4385.39
1548.48
20. Providing and laying dry Unit: 100 Cft.

stone pitching 6
inches to 12 inches thick
complete.
Detail of cost for 100 cft.

Currency: Pak. Rs.

k MATERIAL:

(ordinary) at site 150 00 Cft. 1.50 225.00
225.00
B. LABOUR:

Beldar 2.00 Nos. 80.00 160.00
Coolies 2.00 Nos. 65.00 130.00
650.00

L.S 50.00
Total Equipment & Miscelanious Component
50.00
Total (A + B + C)
925.00

Total 111.00
34.27
1176.65
415.47
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT c1123WIDATATSSHPIRANFEASCONCRETE WK3
CONCRETE
21. Providing and laying in-

situ 1:4:8 cement concrete
(lean concrete) in founda-
tion, plinth and superstruc-
ture using screened graded
bajri 3/4 inch and down
guage including compacting,
curing, cost of form work
and its removal etc. complete
in all respects.
Description of item Quantity Unit Rate Amount

A. MATERIAL:
Cement 11.22 Cft. 467.50 Kg. 3.20 1496.00

Sand 44.88 Cft. 4.50 201.96
Screened Graded Bajri 89.76 Cft. 4.50 403.92
Cartage of Cement 467.50 Kg. 0.30 140.25
B. LABOUR:

Concrete lifter 0.50 Nos. 80.00 40.00
Concrete filler 0.50 Nos. 90.00 45.00
Coolies 3.25 Nos. 65.00 211.25
Bhishty 1.50 Nos. 90.00 135.00
Mistry 0.06 Nos. 150.00 9.38
Extra for lead & lift L S. 160.00
C. EQUIPMENT & MISCELANEOUS:
Shuttering (20% of A+B) 580.55

. Concrrete Mixer with driver
and fuel 0.05 Days 1500.00 71.43
Total Equipment & Miscelaneous Component 651.98
Total =A+ B + C
3554.73
Add 1.5% water charges 53 32

Add 12% overheads
426.57
Total
4390.10
Add 3% Income tax
131 70
4521.80

22. Providing and laying in

Unit. 100 Cft.
situ 1:3:6 cement concrete
in foundation, plinth and super-
structure using screened
graded bajri 3/4 inch and down
gauge including compacting,
curing, ]cost of form work and its
removal etc. complete in
all respects.
Detail of cost for 100cft.

Curency: Pak. Rs.

A. MATERIAL:
Cement 14.75 Cft. 615.00 Kg. 3.20 1968.00

Sand 44.25 Cft. 4.50 199.13
Screened Graded Bajri 88 50 Cft. 4.50 398.25
2749.88
B. LABOUR:

Concrete filler 0.50 Nos. 90.00 45 00
Coolies 3.25 Nos. 65.00 211.25
Bhishty 1.50 Nos. 90.00 135.00
Mistry 0.06 Nos. 150.00 9.38
Extra for lead & lift
L.S. 160.00
660.63
Shuttering (20% of A+B)

682.10
Concrrete Mixer with driver
and fuel
0.05 Days 1500.00 71.43
Total Equipment & Miscelaneous Component
753.53
Total = A+ B + C
4164.03

62.46
Total 499.68
Add 3% Income tax 5142.58
154.28
5296.85
1870.32
23. Providing and laying in situ 1:2:4 Unit. 100 Cft.

cement concrete in foundation plinth
and superstructure using screened
graded bajri 3/4 inch and
down guage including compacting,
curing, cost of form work
and its removal etc. complete
in all respects.
A. MATERIAL:
Cement 20.67 Cft. 861.50 Kg. 3.20 2756.80

Sand 41.34 Cft. 4.50 186.03
B. LABOUR:
Mason (2nd class) 0 50 Nos. 120.00 60.00

Coolies 3.25 Nos. 65.00 211.25
Bhishty 1 50 Nos. 90.00 135.00
Mistry 0.06 Nos. 150.00 9.38

and fuel 0.05 Days 1500.00 71.43
Total = A + B + C
5152.19

77.28
515.22
Add 12% overheads
618.26
Total
6362.95
Add 3% Income tax
190 89
6553.84
2314.16
24. Providing and laying Unit. 100 Cft.

in situ Plum Concrete
1:3 6 (1 cement: 3 sand &
6 coarse aggregate) using 75%
screened graded bajri 3/4
inch and down gaugfe and 25%
boulders 9" and down gauge in
foundation, plinth and super-
structure including form work compacting
curing and removal of form
work etc. complete.
Detail of cost for 100cft. Currency: Pak. Rs.
A MATERIAL:
Cement 14.75 Cft. 614.50 Kg. 3.20 1966.40

Sand 44.25 Cft. 4.50 199.13
Screened Graded Bajri
3/4 inch and down guage 66.37 Cft. 4.50 298.67
boulders 9 inches and down
guage 22.12 Cft. 1.50 33.18
B. LABOUR:

Coolies 3.00 Nos. 65.00 195.00
Bhishty 0.75 Nos. 90.00 67.50
Mate 0.06 Nos. 120.00 7.20
522.20
Shuttering (20% of A+B)

640.78
and fuel 0 05 Days 1500 00 71.43
712.21
Total ':-- A + B+ C
3916.13

58.74
Add 10% contractofstprofit
391.61
Add 12% overheads
469.94
Total
4836 42
Add 3% Income tax
145.09
Total Item i ate for 100 Cft.
4981.52
1758.97
25. Providing and laying reinforced Unit: 100 Cft

cement concrete using screened
graded bajri 3/4 inch and down gauge
having a minimum works cube crushing
strength of 2250 lbs./square
inch after 28 days with a mix not leaner
than 1:2:4, including form work and
its removal, compacting and
curing etc., complete but
excluding the cost of reinforce-
ment, chairs and its labour.
Description of item Quanti Unit Rate Amount
A. MATERIAL:
Cement 20.67 Cft. 861.50 Kg. 3.20 2756.80

Sand 41.34 Cft. 4.50 186.03
B. LABOUR:

Coolies 3.00 Nos. 65.00 195.00
Bhishty 1.25 Nos. 90.00 112.50
Mistry 0.10 Nos. 150.00 15.00

and fuel 0.05 Days 1500.00 71.43
Total = A+ B+ C 5375.60

Total 6638.87
Add 3% Income tax 199 17
Total Item rate for 100 Cit. 6838.04
1
26. Providing and laying M.S. Unit: 50 Kg.

reinforcement bars deformed
and including the cost of straighten-
ing, cutting, bending, binding, wastage
and such overlaps as are not shown
on the drawings, binding wire, cement
concrete 1:2:4 precast or M.S. chairs
and placing in position on cement
concrete precast or M.S. chairs,
tying with binding wire cast of chairs
and wire etc. in all kinds of R.C.C.
work complete in all respects.
Detail of cost for 50 kg Currency: Pak. Rs.
A. MATERIAL:
Mild steel bars (deformed) 50.00 Kg. 13.00 650.00

Cartage of steel 50.00 Kg. 0.30 15.00
B. LABOUR:
Blacksmith (second class) 0.33 Nos. 120.00 40.00

Beldar 0.33 Nos. 80.00 26.67
Cost of binding wire and 50.00 Kg. 0.51 25.50
labour making chairs
Sundries L.S. 50.00
Total =A + B+ C 857.17
Add 1.5% water charges 12 86

Total 1058.60
Total Item rate for 50 kg 1090.36

Total cost for 100 kg 2180.72
27.3/4 inch thick cement plaster Unit: 100 sq.ft.

including making edges, corners
and curing, etc., complete.
Detail of cost for 100 sq.ft. Currency: Pak. Rs.
A. MATERIAL:
Cement mortar 8.75 Cft. 45.00 393.75
Total Material Component 393 75
B. LABOUR:
Plasterer (1st class) 0.44 Nos. 140.00 61.25

Plasterer (2nd class) 0.44 Nos. 120.00 52.50
Beldar 0.06 Nos. 80.00 5.00
Coolies (Boy or girl) 0.88 Nos. 65.00 56.88
Bhishty with mashak 0.13 Nos. 90.00 11.25
Sundries L.S. 25.00
Total =A+ B + C 635.63

Total 785.00
Total Item rate for 100 sq.ft. 808.55

Total Item rate for 100 m2 8703.13
say: 8704.00
Item rate for 1 m2 87.04
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C.1123VV1DATAIPSSHFARANFEASPAI WK3
Item No. 8.2 of Bill of Quantities: Laying of Rail Track
Rail Tracks to be installed:
i) From syphon bridge to inlet pond 250 m
ii) From syphon bridge to outlet pond 445 m
iii) From power house to surge bay 744 m
Total 1439 m
+5% 1511 m
Two rails per track 3022 m
Weight of single rail 14.65 kg/m
Total weight 44.2723 tons
say 44.25 tons
Cost of old rail track 30,000 Rs/tons
Cost of rail tracks 1,327,500 Rs
Cost of tie rods (20% of track costs) 265,500 Rs
Sub-total 1,593,000 Rs
Installation charges (10% of material costs) 159,300 Rs
Total costs 1,752,300 Rs
Cost per m' rail 580 Rs/m

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C %123VVIDATAPSSHPRANFEASISYPEN WK3
Item No. 8.4 and 8.5 of Bill of Quantities: Syphon and penstock pipe incl. installation
1.Weight of 6m pipe (average) 2.5 tons
2.Cost of pipe (30'000 Rs/ton; quoted price) 75,000 Rs/6m pipe
3.Transport from Karachi to site 10,000 Rs/6m pipe

(4'000 Rs/ton)
4.Lifting of pipe from road to installation poin 12,000 Rs/6m pipe
5.Cutting of "V" joints per pipe 450 Rs/6m pipe
6.Ordinary welding (350 Rs/m' joint) incl. 1,400 Rs/6m pipe

labour, generator and electrodes
Total 98,853 Rs/6m pipe
say 98,850 Rs/6m pipe
Cost per ton 39,540 Rs/ton

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C 1123VADATMPSSHPVIANF EAStROADR EH WK3
Item No.11.1 of Bill of Quantities: Rehabilitation of existing road from

Dubair Bazaar to Ranolia Bazaar
Total length (approx ) 3,000 m
Width 4m
Description Unit Qty. Rate Rs/unit Amount (Rs)
1.Levelling existing road m3 6,000 50 300,000 Rs

platform
2. Base course (10 cm) m3 1,200 350 420,000 Rs
3.Double surface m2 12,000 54 648,000 Rs

treatment
4.Dry stone masonry m3 1,200 587 704,736 Rs
5.Stone masonry in m3 300 1,114 334,101 Rs

1:6 mortar
Total 2,406,837 Rs
say 2,406,000 Rs
Cost per m' rehab. road 802 Rs/m'

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C 11234VIDATATSSHFARANEEAS1ROADNEVV WK3
Item No. 11.2 of Bill of Quantities: Construction of new road from

Ranolia Bazaar to weir site
Total length (approx ) 1,575 m
Width 4m
1.Cut/fill for road m3 9,450 106 1,001,700 Rs

platform
2.Sub-base course (15 cmm3 945 265 250,425 Rs
3. Base course (10 cm) m3 630 350 220,500 Rs
4.Double surface m2 6,300 54 340,200 Rs

treatment
5.Dry stone masonry m3 600 587 352,368 Rs

6.Stone masonry in m3 150 1,114 167,051 Rs
1:6 mortar
Total 2,332,244 Rs
say 2,332,000 Rs
Cost per m' rehab. road

1,481 Rs/m'
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C 1123VVNDATA‘PSSHMANFEAS113CCBR 1 WK3
Item No. 11.3 of Bill of Quantities: Construction of RCC girder bridge

near Ranolia Bazaar
1.Excavation m3 80 80.91 6,473 Rs
2.RCC 1:2:4 m3 40 2,397.22 95,889 Rs
3.Reinforcement bars tons 4 21,800.00 87,200 Rs
4.Stone masonry in m3 100 1,113.67 111,367 Rs

1:6 mortar
5.Gabion guide walls m3 128 1,548.92 198,262 Rs
Total 499,190 Rs
Bridge span: 20 m
Cost/m' bridge 24,960 Rs/m' bridge
say 25,000 Rs/m' bridge

.L HYDROPOWER PROJECT cvt 23W \DATNPSSNMRANFEASIRCCBR2 WK3
Bill of Quantities: Construction of RCC girder bridge

over right bank tributary of Ranolia Khwar
Unit Qty. Rate Rs/unit Amount (Rs)
m3 60 80.91 4,855 Rs
m3 30 2,397.22 71,917 Rs
irs tons 3 21,800.00 65,400 Rs
i m3 75 1,113.67 83,525 Rs
Its m3 150 1,548.92 232,338 Rs
Total 458,034 Rs
15 m

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT c1123WNDATMPSSHPRANFEASIRCCBR2 WK3
Item No. 11.4 of Bill of Quantities: Construction of RCC girder bridge

over right bank tributary of Ranolia Khwar
1.Excavation m3 60 80.91 4,855 Rs
2.RCC 1:2:4 m3 30 2,397.22 71,917 Rs
3.Reinforcement bars tons 3 21,800.00 65,400 Rs

1:6 mortar
5.Gabion guide walls m3 150 1,548.92 232,338 Rs
Total 458,034 Rs
Bridge span: 15 m

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT c u23WADATMPSSHMANFEASIRCCBR3 WK3
Item No. 11.5 of Bill of Quantities: Construction of RCC road bridge

adjacent to power house
1.Excavation m3 70 80.91 5,664 Rs
2.RCC 1:2:4 m3 30 2,397.22 71,917 Rs
3.Reinforcement bars tons 3 21,800.00 65.400 Rs

1:6 mortar
Total 365,714 Rs
Bridge span: 17 m

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT C.0 23WIDATA \PSSHPIRANFEAS \POWH WK3
Item No. 11.5 of Bill of Quantities: Construction of power house
Description Unit Qty Rate Rs/unit Amount (Rs)
1.Excavation m3 1,735 80 91 140,379 Rs
2.Flooring m3
a) PCC 1:4:8 m3 225 1,339.11 301,300 Rs
b) PCC 1:2:4 m3 165 1,837.79 303,235 Rs
c) RCC 1:2.4 m3 85 1,969.25 167,386 Rs
d) finish m3 330 180.00 59,400 Rs
3.RCC 1:2:4 m3 520 2,397.22 1,246,554 Rs
4.Reinforcement bars tons 58 21,807.20 1,264,818 Rs
5. Brick masonry m3 150 1,712.10 256,815 Rs
6.Plastering m2 1,850 65.00 120,250 Rs
7.Paint m2 1,850 66.86 123,691 Rs
8.Roof insulation m2 455 165.00 75,075 Rs
9.Water supply, sanitation No 2 20,000.00 40,000 Rs

and fittings for
two bathrooms
10.Doors m2 10 1,500.00 15.000 Rs
11.Windows m2 115 1,000.00 115,000 Rs
12. Steel gate m2 35 1,200.00 42,000 Rs
13.Electrical installation m2 435 700.00 304,500 Rs
Total 4,575,403 Rs
Total area of main hall. 435 m2
Cost/m2 hall 10,518 Rs/m2 hall

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT c 1123WIDATAIPSSHFIRANFEASCOUTRR WK3
Item No. 12.1- b of Bill of Quantities: Construction of control room
1.Excavation m3 330 80.91 26,700 Rs
2. Flooring m3
a) PCC 1:4:8 m3 20 1,339.11 26,782 Rs
b) PCC 1:2:4 m3 10 1,837.79 18,378 Rs
c) finish m3 110 180.00 19,800 Rs
3.RCC 1:2:4 m3 35 2,397.22 83,903 Rs
4.Reinforcement bars tons 2.25 21,807.20 49,066 Rs
5.Brick masonry m3 50 1,712.10 85,605 Rs
6.Plastering m2 560 65.00 36,400 Rs
7.Paint m2 560 66.86 37,442 Rs
8.Roof insulation m2 110 165.00 18,150 Rs
9.Doors m2 2 1,500.00 3,000 Rs
10.Windows m2 7.50 1,000.00 7,500 Rs
11.Electrical installation m2 110 700.00 77,000 Rs
Total 489,726 Rs
Total area of 110 m2

control room
Cost/m2 control room 4,452 Rs/m2 control room
9.4 Summary Sheet of Analysed Rates
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT ANNEX 9.4
SUMMARY LIST OF ITEMS OF WORK
Item No. Description Unit Rate (Rs) Remarks
- XCAVATION & FILLING
emoval of top soil. Cum. 27.58 Applicable

for entire
scheme,
except for
PH.
xcavation in wet silty clay or mud Cum. 57.77
xcavation in gravel and boulders Cum. 157.09 River bed

n river bed
xcavation in hard soil. Cum. 80.91 Applicable for

entire scheme,
except for
PH.
Excavation in hard rock by blasting Cum. 184.47
orrowing, Filling & Compacting of Cum. 42.67

uitable earth from within the site area
upplying, filling and compacting of Cum. 224.41

and in foundation, trenches and floors
upplying, filling and compacting of Cum. 224.41

ajri/crushed aggregate in foundation,
renches and under floors
dd for additional lift of every three feet Cum. 7.30

r part thereof in item Nos. 1 - 5.
10. A dd for additional lead of every chain Cum. 7.30

or part thereof in item Nos. 1 - 5.
f
11. l for additional lift of every three feet Cum. 6.22
r part thereof in item Nos. 6 & 8.
12. -:xtra for additional lead of every chain Cum. 6.22

r part thereof in item Nos. 6 & 8.
13. ailing or pumping out of groundwater Cum. 78.60 For excava-

uring excavation or concreting tion in
river bed.
9.5 Bill of Quantities; Cost Estimates
ANNEX 9.5
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT Bill of Quantities 11-Feb-94 1
Item Description Unit Rate Qty. Amount

No.
1. LAND ACQUISITION 3,224,700
1.1 Land to be acquired for

Power House, Switch yard,
control room etc. includ-
ing 15% compulsory
acquisition charges. Kanal 78200.00 391,000
weir, power canal and all
the allied structures
including syphon and pen-
stock including 15%
15% acquisition charges.
a. Cultivated land Kanal 59800.00 12 717,600

b. Uncultivated/Barren land Kanal 3450.00 108 372,600

new Access Road including
15% acquisition charges.
a. Cultivated land Kanal 59800.00 10 598,000

b. Uncultivated/ban-en land Kanal 3450.00 10 34,500
1.4 Land to be acquired

for staff colony and
rest house including
15% acqusition charges. Kanal 78200.00 5 391,000
1.5 House and water mills to
be acquired (the L.S.
cost includes cost of
land + cost of cons-
truction + demolition
and disposal at appro-
priate site).
a. House and water mills on

access road alignment. Nos. 80000.00 4 320,000
b. Houses to be acquired
adjacent to power house. Nos. 200000.00 2 400,000
File: cu23MIDATA\PSSFIRRANFEASTOO WK3

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT Bill of Quantities 11-Feb-94

No.
2. EARTH WORK AND FILLING 20,189,816
2.1 Removal of top soil. m3 27.58 2640 72,811

2.2 Excavation in wet silt m3 57.77 12910 745,811
clay or mud.
2.3 Excavation in conglomerate

of gravel and boulders
by blasting. m3 157.10 85500 13,432,050
2.4 Excavation in Hard Soil m3 80.91 44170 3,573,795
2.5 Excavation in Hard Rock
by blasting. m3 184.47 2125 391,999
2.6 Filling and compacting
earth. m3 42.67 4825 205,883
sand. m3 224.41 4810 1,079,412
Bajri/aggregate. m3 224.41 2730 612,639
2.9 Additional lift for
bajri/aggregate. m3 24.72 2730 67,486
2.10 Additional lead for
bajri/aggregate. m3 6.22 1275 7,931
•

No.
3. STONE MASONRY 61,205,291
3.1 Coursed rubble masonry

in 1:3 mortar. m3 1840.40 26800 49,322,720
3.2 Uncoursed rubble masonry
in 1:3 mortar. m3 1383.25 1400 1,936,550
3.3 Uncoursed rubble masonry
in 1:6 mortar. m3 1113.67 3025 3,368,852
3.4 Dry stone masonry. m3 587.28 2500 1,468,200
3.5 Gabion wall m3 1548.92 2943 4,558,472
3.6 Stone pitching m3 415.47 1325 550,498
4. CONCRETE
19,878,008
4.1 Lean Concrete (1:4:8). m3 1596.65 3960 6,322,734

4.2 Cement Concrete (1:3:6). m3 1870.32 3975 7,434,522
4.3 Cement concrete (1:2:4). m3 2314.16 1065 2,464,580
4.4 Plum concrete (1:3:6). m3 1758.97 500 879,485
4.5 R.C.C. (1:2:4). m3 2414.51 1150 2,776,687
RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT Bill of Quantities 11-Feb-94

No.
STEEL 3,287,468
5.1 Reinforcement bars Tons 21807.20 65 1,417,468
5.2 Steel gates, Trash

Racks, Steel Railing
etc. including fabrica-
tion transportation and
installation. Tons 55000.00 14 770,000
5.3 Steel trusses for syphon
bridge including fabrica-
tion transportation and
installation. Tons 55000.00 20 1,100,000
PLASTER WORK
1,631,250
6.1 Plastering 18 mm thick in

1:3 mortar. 87.00 18750 1,631,250
R.C.C. PIPES
385,030
7.1 Providing and laying

R.C.C. pipes of following
sizes:
a. 0.2 m dia
250.00 1210 302,500
b. 0.5 m dia
630.00 131 82,530

No.
SYPHON AND PENSTOCK PIPES - 37,183,352

SUPPLY AND ERECTION.
8.1 Installation of Power winch

at penstock, inlet & outlet
ponds. Nos. 200000.00 600,000
8.2 Laying of Rail Track at
Penstock, inlet and outlet
ponds. 580.00 3022 1,752,760
8.3 Provision of Rail Trollies. Nos. 100000.00 10 1,000,000
8.4 Syphon pipe 1.29 m interval
dia including cost of trans-
portation, lifting, cutting
V-joints, joint welding etc. Tons 39540.00 290 11,466,600
8.5 Penstock pipe 1.18 m and
0.9 m internal dias includ-
ing cost of transportation,
lifting, cutting V-joints,
joint welding etc. Tons 39540.00 295 11,664,300
8.6 Emergency valve for
Penstock. Nos. 1200000.00 1,200,000
8.7 Expansion Joints including
transportation and
installation. Nos. 125000.00 13 1,625,000
8.8 Corrosion protection
treatment of syphon and
penstock pipes (internal
and external). m2 1232.00 5656 6,968,192
8.9 Manholes including trans-
portation & installation. Nos. 100000.00 8 800,000
8.10 Sand sluicing valve for
syphon pipe. Nos. 30000.00 1 30,000
8.11 Sealing cloth
m2 300.00 255 76,500
Item Description Unit Rate Qty. Amount Amount US$

No.
9. POWER HOUSE ELECTRO-MECHA- 6,642,330 2,497,000

NICAL EQUIPMENT
9.1
(a) Pelton Turbines 2 Nos.
(b) Speed Governor 2 Nos.
(c) Generator 2 Nos.
(d) Power Pack 2 Nos.
(e) Inlet valves 2 Nos.
(f) Control Panels + Synchronisation
F.O.B. Cost of 9.1 (a - f) - 2,200,000
9.1.1. Sea freight and

insurance © 13.5% of F.O.B.
price. - - 297,000
9.1.2. Inland transportation. Tons 4455.00 46 204,930
9.1.3. Erection and commis-
sioning charges. - L.S. - 2,237,400
9.2 Overhead crane cost

includes supplying,
transportation and
erection. Nos. 4200000.00 1 4,200,000
1

No.
10. ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT — 13,281,250

GRID STATION
10.1 Switchgear 6.6 KV. Set 5000000.00 5,000,000

10.2 Power Transformers
a. 6.6/0.4 KV, 100 KVA. Nos. 80000.00 80,000

6.6/33 KV, 7 MVA. Nos. 610000.00 1,220,000
10.3 Outdoor power circuit
breakers, 33 KV. Nos. 280000.00 560,000
10.4 33 KV Isolators Nos. 250000.00 1,000,000
10.5 Lightning Arresters
(6.6 & 33 KV) Nos. 6666.67 12 80,000
10.6 Potential Transformers
(6.6 & 33 KV) Nos. 18333.34 165,000
10.7 Current Transformers
(6.6 & 33 KV) Nos. 30000.00 6 180,000
10.8 Standby Generator and
D.C. Power Source
(including AMF) L.S. 1100000.00 1,100,000
10.9 Cables and Conductor L.S. 400000.00 400,000
10.10 Miscellaneous items
including hardware L.S. 600000.00 600,000
SUBTOTAL (item 10.1-10.10) 10,385,000


No.
10.12 Octori, Transportation,

and Handling charges 5% of
the total under electrical
equipment head from item
(10.1 to 10.11)
519,250
10.13 Labour charges 15% of
the total under electrical
(10.1 to 10.11).
1,557,750
10.14 WAPDA charges 5% of the
total under electrical
(10.1 to 10.11)
519,250
10.15 Civil Works
L.S. 300,000
11. ROADS AND BRIDGES
6,062,100
11.1 Rehabilitation/Reconditioning
of existing road from Duber
Bazaar to Ranolia Bazaar
including levelling, 10 cm
base course D.S.T and
802.00 3000 2,406,000
retaining structures.
11.2 Construction of new access

road from Ranolia Bazaar to
weir site earthwork, 15 cm
sub-base course, 10 cm base
course, D.S.T and retaining,
structures.
m 1481.00 1575 2,332,575
11.3 Construction of R.C.0
girder bridge near Ranolia
Bazaar including guide banks. m 25000.00 20 500,000

No.
11.4 Construction of R.C.0

girder bridge on Right Bank
tributory including Guide
Banks. m 30535.00 15 458,025
11.5 Road Bridge - adjacent

to power house. m 21500.00 17 365,500
12. POWER HOUSE AND STAFF COLONY 12,444,450
12.1 Power house construction

cost including control room,
switchyard etc. including
civil works, water supply &
sewerage, electrification
etc. complete.
a. Main hall m2 10520.00 435.00 4,576,200

b. Control room & R.R. office m2 4455.00 150.00 668,250
12.2 Staff colony & Rest House
construction cost including
civil work, water supply &
sewerage, electrification
etc. complete. m2 4000.00 1800 7,200,000
13. MISCELLANEOUS
910,000
13.1 Pumping out water at

weir site, bridges etc.
during construction. Job L.S. Job. 350,000
Provision of temporary
bridge at weir site. Job L.S. Job. 60,000
Maintenance of roads , residences, Job L.S. Job. 500,000
offices,etc. during construction
TELECOMMUNICATION
500,000
Telecommunication system
between Duber Bazaar and
weir site. Job L.S. Job. 500,000
9.6 Summary Sheet of Cost Estimates
ANNEX 9.6
Local costs Foreign costs

Item No Description [Rs] [US$)
1. Land acquisition and compensation for 3,224,700

houses/mills
2. Earthwork 20,189,816
3. Stone Masonry 61,205,291
4. Concrete 19,878,008
5. Steel 3,287,468
6. Plaster work 1,631,250
7. R.C.C. pipes 385,030
8. Syphon & penstock pipes (supply & erection) 37,183,352
9. Roads and bridges 6,062,100
10. Power house and staff colony 12,4.44,450
Subtotal item 2 - 10 162,266,765
11. Geological investigations 0.5% 811,334
12. Construction camp(s) incl. all facilities 0.5% 811,334
13. Protection and rehabilitation of environ- 1.0% 1,622,668

ment incl. bio engineering works
14. 33 kV line Ranolia - Patan (civil works)
15. Substation 33/132 kV in Patan (civil works)

(only additional works)
Subtotal item 2 - 15 165,512,100
16. Electro-mechanical equipment 6,642,330 2,497,000
17. Electr. equipm. switchyard and powerhouse 13,281,250
18. Electrical equipment 33 kV line
19. Electrical equipment 33/132 kV substation

(only additional equipment)
20. Miscellaneous 910,000
21. Telecommunication 500,000
Subtotal item 17 - 21 14,691,250
Subtotal item 2 - 21 186,845,680 2,497,000
22. Consultancy, site engineering and admin. (incl. 16,200,000 702,000

purchase and operation of vehicles for staff)
23. Conting. and unforeseen (it. 2-15, 22) 15% 27,256,815

Conting. and unforeseen (it. 16-21) 10% 2,133,358 249,700
24. Proceeds of post-construction sale of rail track, (2,011,656)

power winches and trollies at 60 % of purchase
(incl. dismantling / removal)
GRAND TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS 233,648,897 3,448,700

(all items; price basis 1993; 1 US$=30.1 Rs)
Total converted to local currency (Rs) 337,454,767

Total converted to foreign currency (US$) 11,211,122
File: c \173WNDATA \PSSF4PNRANFEAS1BO0 Date. 11-Feb-94

9.7 Detailed Consultancy Costs (Item 22)
ANNEX 9.7
DETAILED CONSULTANCY COSTS (Item 22)
Foreign: Detailed design 6 MM civil. eng. in Pakistan

(design office)
2 MM electr. / mech. eng.
Construction 30 MM site engineer
3 MM TA for penstock / syphon pipe
installation
41 MM
1 MM foreign TA: 17'120 US$

Total: 701'920 US$
say: 702'000 US$
Local: Detailed design,

construction supervision,
administration
8 % of item 2 - 15; 13'240'968 Rs

Annex 9.6
8 % of item 17 - 19; 1'062'500 Rs
Annex 9.6
2 % of item 16; 1'136'000 Rs
Annex 9.6
(without transport)
Subtotal: 15'439'468 Rs
Purchase and operation of 700'000 Rs

vehicles for staff
Total: 16'139'468 Rs
say: 16'200'000 Rs
10.1 Completion Costs
Constr. costs Local 233.6 Mill.Rs Exch.rate (12/1993) 30.1 Rs/US$
Foreign 3.449 MIILUS$ Annual escalation 1.739 Rs/year
Constr. Local component In MI11. Rs Escal. p.a. 10% IDC local 14% Amount
[%] Nominal Other Total Period [yr] Total [Mill. Rs]
1/94 1.3 1.3 0.25 1.3 0.1

2/94 1 2.3 0.6 2.9 0.75 3.2 0.1
0.1 0.1 1994
1/95 5 11.7 0.6 12.3 1.25 13.8 0.7
2/95 15 35.0 0.6 35.6 1.75 42.2 0.7
0.8 1.5 2.1 1995
1/96 25 58.4 0.6 59.0 2.25 73.2 3.8
2/96 20 46.7 0.6 47.3 2.75 61.6 1.1
0.7 8.0 4.9 13.7 1996
1/97 15 35.0 0.6 35.6 3.25 48.6 2.6
2/97 14 32.7 0.6 33.3 3.75 47.7 0.8
0.8 9.2 20.0 3.4 33.4 1997
Total: 95 222.0 5.5 227.5 291.5 2.3 18.7 24.9 3.4 49.3
2/98 5 11.7 11.7 2.00 14.1
Constr. Foreign component In Mill. US$ Escal. p.a. 4% Exch. rate Equiv. IDC foreign 8% Amount Equiv.
(%] Nominal Other Total Period [yr] Amount Rs/US$ [Mill. Rs] [Mill. US$] [Mill. Rs]
1/94 0.300 0.300 0.25 0.303 30.53 9.3 0.009

2/94 3 0.103 0.103 0.75 0.107 31.40 3.3 0.001
31.84 0.010 0.010 0.3 1994
1/95 4.5 0.155 0.155 1.25 0.163 32.27 5.3 0.005
2/95 4.5 0.155 0.155 1.75 0.166 33.14 5.5 0.002
0.000 33.58 0.034 0.007 0.040 1.3 1995
1/96 4.5 0.155 0.155 2.25 0.170 34.01 5.8 0.005
2/96 24.5 0.8.45 0.845 2.75 0.941 34.88 32.8 0.009
0.000 35.32 0.036 0.027 0.014 0.078 2.7 1996
1/97 4.5 0.155 0.155 3.25 0.176 35.75 6.3 0.005
2/97 4.5 0.155 0.155 3.75 0.180 36.62 6.6 0.002
45.0 1.552 1.552 2.75 1,729 34.88 60.3 0.017 Z
37.06 0.039 0.029 0.090 0.024 0.183 6.8 1997 Z
Total: 95 3.276 0.300 3.576 3.935 135.2 0.119 0.062 0.105 0.024 0.310 11.2 M
X
2/99 5 0.172 0.172 2.00 0.187 37.06 6.9 8
29 04 94 C 22NADATAAPSSFIP \RANFEASIECONNECFDV
10.2 Rehabilitation Costs
ANNEX 102
REHABILITATION COSTS
After 25 years of operation the following rehabilitation costs are considered to be due:
(the costs are price escalated to 1.1.1998 and then assumed as fixed at that level)
Amount [Rs] Amount [US $]
- Civil works 19'200'000

8 % of item 2 - 10; Annex 9.6
(escalated to 1998; factor 1.464)
- Electro-mechanical equipment 3'200'000

item 16 (foreign); Annex 9.6
- Electrical equipment 12'400'000

item 10.1; 10.3 - 10.9; Annex 9.6
Total 31'600'000 3'200'000
The costs are considered to occur in the 26th and 27th year of operation and will be
distributed as follows:
- Civil works 50 % in 26th year; 50 % in 27th year

- El. mech. equipment 33 % in 26th year; 67 % in 27th year
- Electrical equipment 33 % in 26th year; 67 % in 27th year
This yields: Year Amount IRsi Amount IUS $1
26 13'700'000 1'067'000
27 17'900'000 2'133'000
PSSHP/BERICFfT/FIANANEX.doc
103 Annual Recurring Costs
ANNEX 10.3
ANNUAL RECURRING COSTS
A) Annual maintenance costs

Cost basis: 1993
Local: Amount [Rs]
- Civil works : 0.5 % of item 2 - 10; Annex 9.6 811'334

- El. mech. equipment : 1.5 % of item 9.2; Annex 9.5 63'000
- Electr. equipment : 1.5 % of item 17 - 19; Annex 9.6 199'219
- Telecommunication : 1.5 % of item 21; Annex 9.6 7'500
Foreign: Amount [US $]
El. mech. : 1.5 % of item 9.1 (a - f); Annex 9.5 33'000
NB: In the first year of operation increased percentages to cover the actual expenses are
assumed as follows:
- Civil works :1 % in total

- El. mech. equipment : 2 % in total (local and foreign)
- Electrical equipment : 2 % in total
- Telecommunication : 1.5 % (no increase)
The 1993 cost estimates were escalated to 1998 values with the following price escalation
rates:
Local : 10 % p.a.; 4 years (factor 1.464)

Foreign : 4 % p.a.; 4 years (factor 1.170)
The resulting cost estimates for structural maintenance for the first year of operation (1998)
and the following years is presented in the following table:
Annual maintenance costs Amount [Rs]
1998 1999 onwards
Local: - civil works 2'375'600 1187'800

- el. mech. equipment 122900 92'200
- electrical equipment 388'900 291'700
- telecommunication 11'000 11'000
Total: 2'898'400 1'582'700

Amount [US $]
Foreign: - el. mech. equipment 51'400 38'610
B) Annual operation costs
Cost basis: 1993
Personnel: Amount [Rsl Amount [US $1
1 Sr. Eng. in charge 360'000

1 Sr. Eng. deputy (maintenance) 300'000
3 Engineers (shift duty; operation) 540'000
3 Clerks & services
(accounting, adm.) 360'000
6 Skilled / semi-skilled workers 570'000
6 Unskilled workers 370'000
Subtotal 2'500'000
L.S. 400'000
Total 2'900'000
First year of operation
- Consultancy / training by expatriate experts
10 weeks home office (18'000 US$,'MM) 41'000

16 weeks on site (20'000 US$/MM) 74'000
4 trips ( 2'500 US$/trip) 10'000
Total 125'000
- Training local staff 600'000
Total 600'000
P SS HP/13 E RI C HT/RANAN EX. doc

During following 4 years of operation (Amount per year)
Amount [Rs] Amount [US $]
- Consultancy / training by expatriate experts
4 weeks / year home office (18'000 US$/MM) 17'000

4 weeks / year on site (20'000 US$/MM) 18'000
2 trips 5'000
Total 40'000
- Training local staff 600'000
Total 600'000
The 1993 cost estimates were escalated to 1998 values with the following price escalation
rates:
Local: 10 % p.a.; 4 years (factor 1.464)

Foreign: 4 % p.a.; 4 years (factor 1.170)
Annual operation costs Amount [Rs] Amount [US $]
First year of operation (1998) 5'100'000 147'000

Second to fifth year of operation (p.a.) 5'100'000 55'000
Sixth year onwards (p.a.) 4'200'000 ---
C) Miscellaneous annual costs
Amount Psi Amount FUS
- Company management plus 2'900'000 36'000

insurance (8 % of total capital
costs at start of operation)
Summarized the following total annual recurring costs during operation are considered
(A+B+C):
Total annual recurring costs Amount [Rs] Amount [US $]
First year of operation (1998) 10'900'000 234'000

Second to fifth year of operation 9'600'000 130'000
Sixth year onwards 8'700'000 75'000
10.4 Economic Calculations
10.4.1 Economic bi eak-even unit cost of Ranolia

10.4.2 Production cost of Ranolia
ANNEX 10.4.1
Filename' Data.
A CONSICON24 MCI ItO-Ap-A
,-----.......
Capital expenditure Total debt Annual recurring costs Total recur!. Total Revenue Annual
Exch. rate
costs expenditures cashnovr
USS.-> Fla
(Mill. RA) [Mill USS) (Mill Rs) (Mill. Rs) [Mill. USS) (MI11. Re) (Mill. Rs) [Mill. Rs) [MM. Rs)
No. Year
446 9 446 9 (446.91

1997
47.5 0.370 01.2 10 9 0.234 10 8 80 8 85.1 43
1 1098 37.1
9.6 0.130 14.4 14 4 85 1 70.7
2 1999 37.1
98 0.130 14.4 14.4 85.1 70 7
3 2000 37.1
37.1 9.8 0.130 14.4 14.4 85.1 70.7
4 2001
9.8 0.130 14.4 14.4 851 70.7
5 2002 37.1
37.1 87 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.8
8 2003
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
7 2004
371 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.6
8 2005
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 6
9 2008
8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
10 2007 37.1
8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 851 73.8
11 2008 37.1
87 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 a
12 2009 37.1
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.6
13 2010
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.8
14 2011
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.8
15 2012
37.1 13.7 0 073 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
18 2013
2014 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
17
37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73 8
18 2015
2018 37 1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11 5 85.1 73 8
19
2017 37.1 8.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73 8
20
2018 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
21
22 2019 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 6
23 2020 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
24 2021 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73 8
25 2022 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
26 2023 37.1 13.7 1 067 53 2 87 0.075 11.5 64.7 00 (64 7)
27 2024 37.1 17.9 2.133 96.9 87 0.075 11.5 108 4 00 (108 4)
28 2025 37.1 6.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73.6
29 2028 37.1 87 0.075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73 8
30 2027 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
31 2028 37.1 8.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
32 2029 37.1 11.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73.8
33 2030 37.1 117 0.075 11.5 11.5 85 1 73.8
34 2031 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.8
35 2032 37.1 8.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
36 2033 37.1 87 0.075 11.5 11 5 85.1 73 8
37 2034 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 738
38 2035 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 6
30 2038 37.1 a7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
40 2037 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
41 2038 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 65 1 73 6
42 2039 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 5
43 2040 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.8
44 2041 37.1 8.7 0 075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 6
45 2042 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
46 2043 37.1 8.7 0.075 11 5 11.5 85.1 73 6
47 2044 37.1 0.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 5
48 2045 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
49 2048 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73.6
50 2047 37.1 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 85.1 73 8
NB.: The following factors are considered In the tabulated calculations: Net present value [Mill. Rs): 00
Compound Interest rate Annual escalation (prIces,salarles) Discount rate In period 14%
Exchange rate USS -> Rs up to 1998 up to 1998 of analysis :
Local Foreign Local Foreign
Basis 1993. 30.1 Rs
Annual *sc. 1.74 Rs 14% 8% 10% 4% Average economic break-even
unit rate (NPV 0) :
Average annual energy production [MWh):
1.32 Rs/kWh
Daily energy 05% exc.: 45.75 MWII Total Peak Off-peak
Firm peak capacity. 1.91 MW (MWh) (MWh) (MWh)
Daily peak duration: 4 his 84.272 2,785 81.487
ANNEX 10.42
Required capital investment: 508.1 Mill. As
Local: Foreign:
Loan capital: 80% 60% 40%

Loan interest: 14% 8%
Equity capital: 20% 100% 0%

Return on equity: 14% 14%
Weighted interest on loan: 11.60%

Loan life: 20 years
Annuity factor: 0.1305
Annual loan charges: 53.1 Mill. As

Annual recurrent costs: 13.7 Mill. Rs
Return on equity: 14.2 Mill. As
Total annual commitments: 81.0 Mill. As
Average annual production: 64,272 MWh
Average production cost: 1.26 Rs/kWh
29/04/94 A:\ECON\PRODCO.WK1
10.5 LRMC Valued Production of Ranolia
ANNEX 10.5
Required capital Investment: 508.1 Mill. Rs
Local: Foreign:



Loan life: 20 years
Annual loan charges: 68.0 Mill. Rs

Annual recurrent costs: 13.7 Mill. As
10.6 Thermal Equivalent Production Costs
ANNEX 10.6
Thermal Plant Costa Assumption: Installed capacity of Ranoila. I.e. 11.3 MW will be compared to an
equal capacity incrementally installed In a gas-fired combined-cych
Gas fired Combined-Cycle (CC) plant plant having a capacity of 100 - 200 MW
Base price Exch.rate: Capital Interest rate:
Costs: 750 US$/kW Basis 12/93 30.1 Rs/US$ Foreign: 8%

Year: 1993 Ann.esc.: 1.7393 Rs/annum Local: 14 %
Annual escalation:
Foreign: 60 `A Foreign: 4%
Local: 40 % Local: 10 %
Foreign component
Year Annual cost Base cost Escalation Esc. cost Exch. rate Total cost
distrib. [56] [US$ / kW] rate (%] [US$ / kW] [Rs / US$] [Rs / kW]
1996 40 180 1.1249 202.5 35.3 7,151

1997 60 270 1.1699 315.9 37.1 11.705
Subtotal: 18.856
Local component
Year Annual cost Base cost Exch. rate Base cost Escalation Total cost
dlstrib. [%] [US$ / kW] [As / US$] [Rs / kW] rate MI [Rs / kW]
1996 40 120 35.3 4,238.1 1.3310 5.641

1997 60 180 37.1 6,670.3 1.4641 9,766
Subtotal: 15,407
TOTAL: 34,263
Econ. lifetime: 25 yrs Annuity fact 0.1161

Weighted Interest rate: 10.70 %
Station fact( 0.638 O&M: 4 %/yr
Gas price: 2.1 S/Mill. BTU Therm eff.: 40 % Heat rate: 3412 BTU/kWh (therm.)
Heat rate: 8530 BTU/kWh (eiectr.)
Fuel cost: 1.791 Scents/kWh Fuol price 0%
(1993) escalation
Fuel cost: 1.791 Scents/kWh Escalation 1.0000

1997 factor
Ann. capital charges CC 3979 Rs/kW at end of 1997
Converted to Ranolla station factor
Capital charges 0.712 Rs/kWh at end of 1997
O&M costs 0.245 Rs/kWh at end of 1997
Fuel costs 0.664 Rs/kWh at end of 1997
Equivalent production 1.621 Rs/kWh at end of 1997

costs CC plant
In-house losses 4%
External losses 10 %
Costs in Ranolia area 1.854 Rs/kWh at and of 1997
AAECON\THERMAL.WKI 29/04/04 14:28

10.7 Sensitivity Calculations
10.7.1 Break-even production costs; - 10 % construction costs
10.7.2 Break-even production costs; + 10 % construction costs
10.7.3 Break-even production costs; - 10 % annual recurring costs
10.7.4 Break-even production costs; + 10 % annual recurring costs
10.7.5 Break-even production costs; 12 % local capital interest

7 % foreign capital interest
12 % return on equity
10.7.6 Break-even production costs; 16 % local capital interest

9 % foreign capital interest
16 % return on equity

ANNEX 10.7.1
Required capital investment: 457.3 Mill. Rs
Local: Foreign:



Loan life: 20 years

Return on equity: 12.8 Mill. Rs
Total annual commitments: 74.3 Mill. Rs
29/04/94 A:\ECON\PRODCO.WKI
ANNEX 10.72
Local: Foreign:


Weighted Interest on loan: 11.60%

Loan life: 20 years

ANNEX 10.7.3
Local: Foreign:



Loan life: 20 years

Average annual production: 64.272 MWh
ANNEX 10.7.4
Local: Foreign:



Loan life: 20 years

ANNEX 10.7.5
Required capital investment: 508.1 Mill. As
Local: Foreign:

Loan interest:
12% 7%

Return on equity:
12% 12%

Loan life: 20 years

,
ANNEX 10.7.6
Required capital investment: 508.1 MIII. Rs
Local: Foreign:

Loan Interest:
16% 9%

Return on equity:
16% 16%

Loan life: 20 years

29/04/94 A:\ECOMPRODCO.WK1
ANNEX 10.7.7
Local: Foreign:



Loan life: 15 years

Annual recurrent costs: 13.7 Mill. As
ANNEX 10.7.8
Local: Foreign:

Loan Interest: 14% 8%


Loan life: 25 years

10.8 Economic Internal Rate of Return
Financial Internal Rate of Return
10.8.1 Summary of Economic costs
10.8.2 EIRR - on Thermal Equivalent cost
10.8.4 EIRR - on WAPDA - LRMC at Rs.2.41/kWh
10.8.5 Tariff Calculations as per Private Sector Power Generation Policy.
10.8.6 FIRR - based on tariff calculations in Annex 10.8.5

RANOLIA SMALL HYDROPOWER PROJECT Summary of economic costs
Local costs Foreign costs

Rem No Description (Re) (USS)
1. Land acquisition and compensation for 2,740,986

houses/mills
2. Earthwork 19,281.274
3. Stone Masonry 58,451,053
4. Concrete 18,983,493
5. Stool 3,139,532
6. Plaster work 1,557,844

7. R.C.C. pipes 385,030
8. Syphon & penstock pipes (supply & erection) 36,067,851
9. Roads and bridges 5,789,306
10. Power house and staff colony 11.884,450
Subtotal Item 2 -10 166,639,837

11. Geological investigations 0.5% 777,699
12. Construction camp(s) incl. all facilities 0.5% 777,699
13. Protection and rehabilitation of environ- 1.0% 1,555,398
mont incl. blo engineering tworks
14. 33 kV line Ranolia - Patan (civil works)
15. Substation 33/132 kV In Paten (civil works)

(only additional works)
Subtotal item 2 -15 168,650,634

16. Electro-mechanical equipment
6,443,060 2,497,000
17. Electr, equIpm. switchyard and powerhouse
11,953,125
13. Electrical equipment 33 kV line
19. Electrical equipment 33/132 kV substation

(only additional equipment)
20. Miscellaneous
910,000
21. Telecommunication
500,000
Subtotal item 17 - 21
13,363,126
Subtotal Item 2 - 21
178.466,819 2,497,000
22.
Consultancy, site enginaortng and admin. (Incl.
10,203,000 702,000
purchase and operation of vehicles for ataff)
23. Cording. and unforeseen (it. 2-15, 22)
Conting, and unforeseen (it. 16-21) 15% 26,227,595
10% 1.980,619 249,700
24. Proceeds of post-
construction sale of rail track.
power winches and trollies at 60 % of purchase (2,011,656)
(incl. dismantling / removal)
GRAND TOTAL. CAPITAL. COSTS

(all Items; price basis 1993; 1 USS ■ 223 544 371 3 448 700
30.1 Re)
Total converted to lacal currency tits )
Total converted to foreign currency CUSS) 327,400,241
10,877,084
c;i.•
. 111WCAT AV,
SS, INIANC EASIDOGEC.WICI
•-• • • • • .
Filename
C tfiSnA.1 W K
Each oats Capital expenddute Total debt Annual lecuenng costs • Total lac... Total R•r•nue •• Annual
US$.> Rs costs aspendaulesi casala.
No Year I (MillfisI (Mill. USS1 11.1111 Rs) (4.4.11 Rs( (M.11 USS( lull Rl( ; (WI Rs) lull Rs( 144.11 R4)
•
a 199• 30 10 I • .4 0.410 la 7 10 7 e 110 7)
•2 1095 31.64 53.7 0.339 84 2 64 2
.1 154 21
1868 33 56 129.0 1.111 160 3 ! 166 3 066 3)
0 1097 35.32 92 2 2.085 185 8 105 8 (155 8)
1 1998 37 05 135 0.107 20 4 109 0 234 ie a I 400 119 2 791
2 1999 37 06 98 0.130 144 144 119 2 1044
3 I 2000 37 06 90 0.130 I 14 4 1 14 4 119 2 1C4 8
4 I 2001 37 06 I
96 0.130 14 4 . 14 • 119 2 iC.4 8
5 2002 37.06 96 0.130 III ; 144 119 2 104 9
8 2003 37 08 0.7 0 075 11 5 I 1i 5 119 2 107 7
7 2004 37 08 87 0 075 II 5 l 11 5 119 2 137 7
a 2005 37 08 6.7 0.075 11 3 11 5 112 2 107 7
0 2008 37.08 87 0 075 II 3 1i5 116 2 1O7 7
10 2007 37.08 87 0,075 11 5 11 5 119 2 ICI 7
11 2006 37.06 87 0 075 115 115 119 2 IC) 7
12 2009 37 08 87 0 075 11 5 11 5 116 2 107 7
13 2010 37.00 87 0.075 11 5 11 5 116 2 IC? 7
14 2011 37.08 87 0 073 115 115 119 2 107 7
13 2012 37 08 87 0 075 11 5 11 5 119 2 ICI 7
18 2013 37.08 57 0 015 11 5 11 5 119 2 107 7
17 201• 37.06 87 0 075 11 S 11 5 119 2 IC7 7
to 2015 37 08 a7 0 075 115 115 110 2
19 2016 37 06 101 7
87 0 075 11 5 II 5 119 2
20 2017 37.08 107 7
87 0 075 115 II 5 119 2
21 2016 37 Oa 1017
87 0 075 II 5 11 5 119 2
22 2019 37.06 137 7
87 0 073 11 5 11 5 110 2
23 2020 37 06 107 7
07 0 075 11 5 11 5 I
24 2021 37 06 119 2 1 101 7
87 0 075 115 115
25 2022 37 08 119 2 I 1317
26 87 0 075 11 3 ti 5
2023 37.06 13.1 1.087 115 2 107 7
52 8 a7 0 075 115 64 1
27 2024 37.06 17.1 00 164 1 ,
2.133 98.1 87 0 075
28 2025 37.00 11 5 107 9 03 1137 ti,
29 a7 0 075 11 5 11 5
2028 37 08 116 2 107 7
30 0 7 0 075 11 5 11 5
2027 37.09 119 2 t C7 1
31 87 0.075 11 3
2028 37.08 11 5 1 19 2 107 7
32 2029 81 0 075 11 5
37.06 11 5 119 2 lol 7
33 2030 8 0 075 115
37.08 11 5 119 2 107 7
34 2031 0.7 0 075 115
37.08 115 119 2 107 7
35 2032 a/ 0 075 115
37 06 1i5 119 2 107 7
36 2033 37.06 87 0 075 115 115 119 2 1377
37 2014 37 08 7 0.075 11 5 11 5 119 2 137 7
38 2035 37.06 b 7 0.075 11 5 It 5 119. 3 101 7
39 2038 37 08 a7 0 075 11 5 11 5 119 2 107 1
40 2037 37 08 7 0 075 115 11 5 119 2 107 7
41 2030 37.00 67 0.075 11 5 11 5 119 2 107 7
42 2039 37.08 8,7 0.073 11 3 11.3 1192 107 7
43 2040 37.08 6 7 0.075 11.5 li 5 119 2 107 7
441 2041 37.08 8.7 0 075 11 5 11 5 119 2
45 2042 8.7 0.073 107 7
37.08 11.5 11 5
46 87 110 2 107 7
2043 37.06 0 075 11 5
47 11 3 119 2 107 7
2044 37.09 11.7 0 073 11 5
46
11 5 119 2 107 7
2045 37.00 8.7 0 075 11.5
49 11 5 119 2 107 7
2048 37.00 57 0.073 11 5
50 11 3 110 2 107 7
2047 37.00 8.7 0.075 11 5 11.5 119 2 107 7
87 0 075 11.5 11 5 119 2 107 7
NO :
Th•toalonlng factoni•r• conslocu•6 {nth. tabulated calculations:
Eschang• tats US$ •> Rs Annual escalation (pnces•4laties)

during consuuction
Bawl 1993: Local Avg unit sale
30.10 Rs Fot•hgn 1 45
Annual sec. 1.74 Rs I. Dismal equivalent cost)
• iye•r 1 • 50)
10% •%
Aserag• annual anew p1OCIUC909 /UM*
Oa.ly energy 95% sec.:

43.73 'NMI
cum peak capacity: Total Peak
1.91 MW Ott-p••k
Daily peak situation: lMWhl IMV/h)
4 Ass PAWN
04.272 2.7u5 Economic mletnal fats
01.4117 of ovum
20 6%
%V c1 1,21,731 vini•i to
6191 pr,•110 10001/033 60 (.2 21 Z.P0 IN ►
111M111 111/Aril :uog limp tired Aim°
MVO 161 Aliowdir• mired tunl
'••d 1v101
VW*/ GL•C• :roll %co Reii•A• Aim°
:16•A•sil uoponpoid Atlivuo moue viloiii•v

loc • 1 Jrox) *St
(test 'no •1088 1601
t o Pet •ose ionutly
11'0•6•A 10 0E1151 11,111.
Cy I uBielej • 01'06 :6681 1119
yo•lotAppir/ ;1191 pun 11•1"
tiogonosugo Ouunp
(soimrs't•opcf) ue71ir32e lonuuy 'U c• 89(1 om•esur4 3.3
36
091lngilr• pilIvAise• •t8 impsiopilugo Vie amigo' flum000l voi • or4
• CO a la C it
• 71 611 C/0'0 L'9
8 18 S It Si I, 810'0 19 0016 (Ka
• e ta S 11 OS
• t.t. 6. 12 5(00 E*9 90'/C (16
to c It 5 11
• 510 0 90 LC S
9,:
r0 ID
8 10 it t
• 1.9 CLO 0 La 9016 L•
6 II C 11 9 11
• ,c1 CLO 0 L'9 6•812 B.
e 16 S It
I GI 19'0
•• CLO 0 L 0 LI 21,02 Cr
6 16 11 SIt 810'0 1'a 90 LC 1602 ►t
• C9 e 18 t II CLO 0 10 9016 o rod
roz C•
6 15 C"11 C It 90 LC
• CO 6/0'0 19 2•
6 18 CI SI1 90 LC
C/0 0 9 9602 1V
• CI 16 S1 II CLO 0 LD 1602 131,
711 6 15 S 11 0900.112e
11 StO 0 L O 9602 BC
7:9 8 15 11 9016
11 StO 0 1'9 5n022
60 BC
• c9 6 15 S 11 90'16
S 11 8100 19 LC
• C9 6 16 C 11 90 LC C602
SI 510'0 L'9 DC
C9 e 16 I 90•U 2602
Z CC
S 11 5100 9
• Cl 6 16 S 11 90'16 K
C It SLO 0 LB
• C.0 6 16 CI1 90 LC 0602 CC
G 11 CLO 0 9
• CA 6 16 6 11 C1I 00 LC 0200 EC
510 0 1O
• 09 t8 I1 5 11 00 LC 0202 IC
810 0 t9
• 71 E 15 S 11 S It 00 16 2 OC
610 0 L 9
• c9 E 16 S 11 90 16 0202 62
G1I 6100 L
'0 LC11 CC 9 101 G 92
610 0 L I 96 CCI*2
11 r91 00 1 ►9 I 'LI V62 02 12
S tl 510 0 L 9 9 26
0 16
1001 rc t 9
000°66
"1
1/ C C202 92
11 SII 610'0 '1 9
• C9 6 ae S1 90 LC 220 82
S It 610 0 L 0
• 7-9 6 16 90 LC 8 1,2
C 11 I 0100 L 9
• CI 8 16 I 90 IC OZOZ CZ
SlI 610 0 L
169 6 16 CIt 6102 22
Si I 510 0 L 9
• CO 9 0.1 (6 6102 12
615 C 11 S It 10"0 L
• CA 00 LC 1l02 02
16 S 1 IL ctt 510 0 L.11
► Cl 90 LC 9
111
6 10 020z Si
e te 5 11 c'tt 610 0 t 9
• CO
90 LC 91
6 16 G11 S 11 5100 L BO /C L1
6 16 S 11 S it 8/0 0 L B 90.16 6102 91
• Cl 6 IS 5II g'tt Caro L'9 9016 SI
• C9 18 G11 tt stO 0 19
• C9 DO 16 VI
6 15 S 11 c1I 510 0 L9
• 61 2
011Z10
02
° 2 Cl
5 16 S 11 t CLO 0 L9 6002 21
• Cl 6 19 11 1 C100 L 9 900000.1
1162C 9002 II
19 C 11 Sit CLO 0 0 0016 100
,002 2 01
• CO 5 15 S 11 S II 510 0 L
r CO 90 /C 9002 0
S 16 i C1I 6/00 1 0 C002 9
6 15 S 11 II 6(0 0 L9 0900416 6 L
• CO 6 IS 11 tI CLO 0 L 9 90 LC C 002 9
C 11 16 ► s1 r1I OCt 0 9G 90 LIC6 2002 c
( 1 6 16 ► r1 ► •1 OC1 0 90 1002 1
C 11 7 15 ► el •1 061 0 90 16 0008 6
t 51e 9.1
IC 6 16 0 or
I ► st
I e el
OCI0
PC2 0
98
01 • 02 /91'0 S CI
00 LC
90'16
600,11
60 2
t
'e c'11 0 S91 9 691 8110'8 2 26 /601 0
IC s,..1 C 991 C 991 lilt 0 621 OC CC
Z SC 1•
lz rg1 2 r9 Z 1-9 1726 1 CS III IC 61161 2•
ft Ill 91 1 01 01P 0 ► 01 OC
C.
• t. ri I•ti 6'111 I Intl 1•13 1rv11 Issn anti I•u I-u WIN) Issn 11.141 leoA I Ohl
rruulr• is•,rouve•• ; atom •11"-ssn
••••uur ; ono-., !viol I .110, fttmon,•■
irnuuy 10 0 01.101 • milpuodwo 1rpdr3 el., .11•
I
tv.,..4003`5,31,•■
10,,0'
0,01.03pj
2'9-01 XJNNV
•
IIM11/311 iP
oroci
(east) ZCB't Cal:I
0013,4 .2to 0691'1 1►9► I
Iteat) DWI ZOC*0
sP sot uoptivote • ItIM4/1111 Illaii4/1HI
pod ubioieg tied meo-i
x09 %CZ
u6I•,od ITIO1 uo odoid • u rq
tFOTIOT—
11M6feLi 06'1 :team) °roc'
teat tunr 'BM:oeinos YedVM Jo (OVitil)
lowittnirt unti liuoi
16 ► IL
•(uu13t tiinicile
•111/ ifoo•lon 3oU0110,3 SlieZ U•►S,
luNart) tug ►
(ttmtor) limn) :uositnp tilted /two
'..d-uo hired t 0.1 :Aimed", lived tuiiA
11101 tIMYI :'31(0 %CO AD/w• Alt00
*MN) OOPOMpOid ARtouo tonuut ofItutaIl

10C • I mt I)
141, %DI
tree! runr 'OM :11 aInaS
l'OeYM 10 o► ttn .,,, as • -I 113 ►r1 '210 ptnuuy
117 umatod trawl nkl 01.0C :COOt 111159
Itwoirttotiluittirt pun Ow
1,0132O/111UO3 Oupnp
(stp9ort•t•tvd) uoptivot• !velour •11 4• Ian •IO/ 16uvy3,3
ItuOnvintiel p•ivinqw1 eta to! pottp!tuot ht ssopoi6o1.401101 gnu.

ON
I hl 9 PSI C'11 Olt CLO*0 L'a
t hl 0 PSI G'11 C't I SLOV LB 00'/C LtOZ OS
I C•vt 9 vs( vt SL0'0 90'/C 9rOZ
I hl 9 ►St S1I VII S20'0 L*9 90'LC CPOL 9►
I CPI 9 sll S II S II SLO 0 t 90'n ptin in
1 hl 9 Kt stt c't1 C10.0 1.9 90'LC CPOL 9►
I ht 11 sit S It VI t SLO*0 Lit 00'LC Z ►OZ CV
I CPI 0 Kt C II C II CLO'0 90'LC VOL tY
I rig 9 PSI SI1 C II 90'2C
CLO 0 L I OtOL Cs
1 C4/1 9 KI G II 90'LC
S II WOO ecoc
I C1I 9 rS 1 SII SIt 90.1C
ScL
i0 0 L'9 9COL It
I hi 9 PSI StI Stt 90'LC LCOL
L'Il Or
I C71 9 PC1 CI1 C II 90'LC 9COL
CIO'0 L'9 eC
I C*1 9 Kt SII VII 90'LC ;COL OC
;LOO L'9
I Cy: 9 PCI SII C It 90'/C ► oZ LC
CLO-0 L9
I hl II PSI C It C'll 90'1C CCOL BC
GLO.0
1 ht 9 151 S ii S't I 90'n ZCOZ SC
SLOG
1 ht 01St S't I Si I 90 LC I COZ
SL0-0 L9
a hl p PSI S I! VII 90'LC °COL CC
S,L0 0 L'9
I he 9 Kt S II c'11 90'LC 6202 EC
SLO'0 L'9
t C3'1 9 K1 c II 00'.1C 9LOZ IC
S II WOO L'O
I ht 9 PSI S It 90'LC [COL OC
S II SLO 0 L' I
1 Ctt 9 tS I 90'LC BLOC et
t 11 S'l I S/0'0
04 LOt) 00 9 L01 90'/C SUR IL
S II SLO 0 190 CCI'L 1 Ll
It .91 00 I tit 90 LC ►Z0Z Le
S it CLO'0 L0 ICC LOOT I'Cl
I C► i 0 Kt 00'LC CZOL 9Z
S It c 11 GM 0 /11
t ht 90'LC ZZOL SZ
9 PSI S II S II c10'0 L'9 90'LC 1ZOL tZ
I NI 9 Kt C It C il CLOG L'O 00- IC OZOL CL
i 0.1 0 PCI G 11 G it CLO 0 L'Il 90 LC OtOZ CZ
t Coq 9 Kt S 11 SIt StO 0 LB 00'LC 9102 IL
1 ft. 9 1S 1 5 11 C It 510 0 L'O BO LC /IOC OZ
1 tvl 9 Kt S II G II SLOG 90'LC 9tOL et
I ht I Kt SI1 S1t S10'0 90'LC SIOL It
I CPI 9 Kt S II S It GLOO L'9 90 a ►IOL LI
t Cwt 0 PCI C It stI SLO 0 00'LC CIO[ 91
i ht 9 Kt C II C II CLO 0 90 LC ZIOZ St
i CPI 1 PSI C It C ll CLOO /11 90'LC ttOZ vI
t CPI 9 PSI S It c•ti COO •L 9 90'LC 0102 CI
t Erg 0 PSI S It C it MO DO LC 600L LI
t Cy. 9 1-S1 S II S II SOO L 9 90'LC 9002 It
1 hl 9 VII S II t 11 SLO 0 L9 OLELC LOO[ et
1 C',1 9 nil S II S 11 5100 L 9 90 LC 900Z a
I Cwt to "-It St1 c ti CLOD L 90'LC COOL 9
I CV. 9 fll • ;1I .S11 SLCI O 19 90 LC POOL
1 Cy'. I 1,11 C 1! GII CLO 0 • LI 90 LC COOL 9
t Cal a psi ttt ; t t t 0E1'0 1 06 90 LC ZOO[
L C.' • 9 '-Si t PI I IP PI OLI 0 9 90'LL 100L ►
L 0,1 ' I K1 t •I t► OCI 0 0a 90'LC 000[
L Cwt • 9tS1 I.•1 ► 1.1 °CV O 06 00 LC east
o1/ .1 f PSI 0 09 I 9 61 KC 0 es Ot OZ /91'0 s CI 90 LC 9561 t
19 511) , 9 S91 9 Silt 5907 CO LC SC L661
IC 9511 1 C991 Vint 11 l'l 0 GZt 9S CC 9001 t•
CZ PI' L 1. 21 1 L19 6Zt 0 L'tS ►r1C 5661 Z•
tt 9:1 (9 191 01,0 ►- ► Ol'OC ►661 C.
Issn lav't1 I lilt law) Issn law) I Itu lartl i•lA ON

III Irn) ti twil I !It) awl) (+weird ic kywril
rowel TO liosntiouadr•
ri3OUY •nu•bi mai •tin3e, pool .1t03 0U111,13811.nuuy lqaP1a101 tunlipuodt• levtleo 10,13
1)iMINIkill,S1-9,1111,0.1Ykr 0
fr'9•C1i )i3NNV
ANNEX 10.8.5
Tariff calculation
Filename:
CARANOLIA\FEAS\FIRR.WK1
Tariff (basis late 1993)
Tariff valid in 1998 (basis late 1993; escalation 4
Exch. rate: 30.10 Rs/US$ years ©4%)
Exch. rate: 37.06 Rs/US$
[cS/kWh] (Rs/kWh] [c$/kWh] [Rs/kWh]

Year 1 - 10: 6.50 1.96 7.60 2.82
Year 11 - 30: 4.81 1.45 5.63 2.09
Year 1 - 30: 5.91 1.78 6.91 2.56
Year.31 - 50: 4.81 1.45 5.63 2.09
Period: 30 years
Discount
rate: 10 %
Lovell. tariff: 5.91 c$/kWh
Year [c$/kWh]
1 6.50
2 6.50
3 6.50
4 6.50
5 6.50
6 6.50
7 6.50
8 6.50
. 6.50
10 6.50
11 4.81
12 4.81
13 4.81
14 4.81
15
4.81
16
4.81
17
4.81•
18
4.81
19 4.81
20
4.81
21
4.81
22
4.81
23
4.81
24
4.81
25
4.81
26
4.81
27
4.81
28
4.81
29
4.81
30
4.81
ANNEX'%O.8.6
Filename.
c • imhouato LA IAA) WK.
Even. rue Capital eapenditure Total debt Annual recurring costs Total rector. ' Total i Revenue ! Ann...41
USS->As
coin 4x0cilOdurOS, ' casnilo.
No Year (Mal As) (Mai. USS( (M•1 Rs) (Mal. Rs) (1.4j1 USS) Win. Rs) IM1 Rs1 411 Rsi : (MW St)
.3 1994 30.10 4.5 0410 ,

le 8
.2 1995 31.84 56.0 0.329 66 3 16
1
69 5
1998 33.56 134.8 8
9 iii
1.111 172.1
0 1997 1721 i
35 32 98.3 2.085 169 9
1 1998 37.06 14.1 0.187
I 1014:6 92:$37:1
1-
21.0 109 0 234 *98 40 6 '
2 1999 37 00 181.1 1435
96 0.130 14• 14 4 i
3 2000 37.06 181.1 166 7
4 96 0.130 14 4 14 4 I
2001 37.06 181 1 115669 76
S
96 0.130 14 ♦ 14 4 181.1
2002 37 06 166 7
96 0 130 *44 14 4 '
2003 37 08 181 1
87 0 075 i15
2004 37 06 II 5 . 181 I
87 0 075 II 5 115
2005 37 08 181.1
9 2006 8.7 0 075 II 5 11 5 I
37.06 181 1 1:
66
9
10 2007 8.7 0 073 11 3 11 5 I
37.06 181 1 189 8
11 07 0.075 115 11 5
2008 37 08 181 1 1698
17 7 0 075 11 5
2009 37.06 11 5 134 0 122 5
*3 2010 87 0 075 11 5
37.08 13.4 0 522 5
14 87 0 075 11 5
2011 37.06 134 0 122 5
*5 2012 07 0 075 t13
37.00
16 2013 7 0 075 11 5 111
1
37 08 1 :11:5
5 1
1 1 272 35
t? 2014 87 0 073 11 5
37.06 11 5 • 134
34 000 122 3
18 2015 87 0 075 11 5
37.08 134 0
*9 2016 8.7 0.075 II 5
37.06 11.5 134.0
20 2017 8.7 0 075 11.5
37.08 II 5 I 1340 :1225
22
22 55
21 2018 87 0.073 11.5
37.08 11.5 1 134 0 122 5
22 2019 87 0 075 115
37.08 115 134 0 122 5
23 2020 37.00 8.7 0.075 11.5 11.5 1 134 0 1725
24 2021 87 0 073 11.5
37.05 115 134 0
25 8.7 0 075 122 3
2022 37.06 11.5 II 3
2a 2023 87 0.075 1112c.0
2
45
37.00 13.7 1.067 11.5 t13 340
27 53.2 87 1134.0 122 5
2024 37.08 17.9 0.075 11.5 64 7
28 2.133 176.0 0.7 00
2025 37.06 0.073 11 5 1011 8
11.5
4
5 .
29 2028 0.7 0 075 00
37 08 11 5
30 2027 8.7 134 0 1164
22 5
r)
37 06 0.075 11 5
31 2028 8.7 0 075 134 0 122 5
37.08 11 5 11.5
32 2029 87 134 0
37.06 0.075 115
33 115 134 0
2030 37.08 87 0 075
34 11 5 II 5
2031 37.06 87 0 075 134 0 2
22 '2 5
i25
35 11 5 11 5
2032 37 06 87 0 075 122 5
38 11 5 11 5
2033 37.08 87 0.075 12 73
11.5 11 3
37 2034 37.06 07 0 075 11114
1
38 11 5 1t5
2035 37.06 87 0 075 12 2 5
39 2038 11.5 11.5
37 08 8.7 0 075 134 3
0 122 5
40 2037 11 3 11 5
37 08 87 0 075 134 0
41 2038 11 5 11 5
37.08 87 0 075 134 0 12 2 5
42 2039 11.5 115
37.06 87 0.075 1340 1225
43 2040 11 5 11 5
37.06 8.7 0.075 134 0
44 2041 11.3 11 5
37.08 87 0.075 122 5
5
45 2042 11.5 11.5
37.08 8.7 0.075 122 5
40 2043 11.3 11 5
37.08 7 0 075 11334
34
70i
47 2044 I15 11 3
37.08 8.7 0.075
49 2045 11.5 11.5
37.08 8.7 0 075
49 2046 11 5
37.08 0.7 11.5
50 2047 0.075 11.5
37.08 8.7 11.5 I
:34
34 02
0.075 11 5 1
:2
222
22
23 5:5
87 115 134 0
0.075 115 11 3 134 0
NB.: :223
1225
The following factors ale considered In the tabulated calculations:
Eachango rate USS•s• He

Annual escalation (prIces.salanes)
Basra 1993: during construction
30.10 Rs Local Avg unit sale rate fRa/kWhj :
Annual 'sc. Foreign 2 82
1.74 As (year 1 • 10)
10% 4%
Average annual energy production (SAWN:
Avg unit sale rate (Fts,/kWhl :
(year 11 • 30) 2 00
Daily energy 95% Inc.:
Firm peak capacdy: 45.75 1.4W11
1.91 MW Total Peak
Daily peak duration: 011.peak Avg and sale rate (Rs/kWhj
(MWhj (year 31 • 501 2 00
4 his (MWhj (MWhj
54,372 2,785 01.487
Financial internal rate
ol return (FAR).
29 2%
•4C
■
Avrt 61'
PHYDO
PAKHTUNKHWA HYDEL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Peshawar
Energy & Power Department
No. 66-70 / SHYDO/Ranolia/Tariff
To Dated Peshawar the 12 / 04 / 2013
Fvy nAct
Mr. Syed Safeer Hussain
Registrar — roc 1Pri1z)
National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) –4-
2"d Floor, OPF Building, G-5/2 , Islamabad.
1Yre (Li c
O.; I
Subject: Application of Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO) for grant
of Generation License in respect of 17 MW Ranolia Hydropower Project,
District Kohistan
Dear Sir,
Reference your office letter No. NEPRA/R/LAG-30/RHPP/3195 dated April o5,

2013 received on April 08, 2013. Response to the queries and short comings mentioned in the
subject letter is as follows:
I. Your good office has mentioned that Expression of Interest to provide credit or
financing as required pursuant to Regulation 3(5)(d)(ii) has not been provided.
We are please to submit copy of Loan Agreement (3 copies) to comply with the
requirements of regulation.
II. Location maps are now provided (3 copies) to comply with the requirement of the
regulation 3(6) (c)(i).
III. Information regarding infrastructure development are contained in the EPC
document (Scope of work) as infrastructure development for this project is part of
EPC contract. Three copies of EPC document are attached to comply with
regulation 3(6)(c) (10).
("-.4 In response to the contents of para (2) of your office letter, we would like to state
as follows:
i. SHYDO is making best efforts to start negotiations on Power Purchase Agreement

(PPA) with PESCO (Power Purchaser) and to seek consent of PESCO to off take
Power from Ranolia Hydropower Project. We are hopeful that this matter will be
resolved very soon. At that time consent letter from Power Purchaser for
procurement of power and approval of interconnection study will be submitted to
your good office.
ii. Feasibility study report of the project has been prepared by the consortium of
international consultants and was further reviewed and updated by experienced
Consulting firms. The process of preparation and revision/review of the report was
107-PHYDO House, Plot #38, Sector B/2, Please- V, Huyatabad, Peshawar. Tel: 091
-9217463, Fax: 091-9217464
Page 1 of 2
managed by in house team at SHYDO. The same report formed the basis of
approval of loan from Asian Development Bank and hence has been successful in
establishing its bankability. SHYDO, being the one window facility at provincial
level is allowed to approve feasibility studies of various projects including those
projects which are being developed by SHYDO itself. Hence no formal approval
is needed. However, areas of feasibility study such as Environmental Study has
been approved by provincial Environmental Protection Agency. Approval for
Interconnection Study as mentioned in sub para (i) shall be made by PESCO.
As mentioned above, Power Purchaser for this project will be PESCO. We are
thankful to your good office and would seek your guidance and patronage to undertake the
development of vast untapped hydropower potential of the Province.
Best regards
Dire' tor (P&F

PHYD • , Peshawa
Encls :
1. Copies of loan Agreement -3 nos.
2. Copies of location maps- 3 nos.
3. Copies of EPC Document (Scope of Work)-3 nos.
107-PHYDO House, Plot #38, Sector B/2, Phase- V, Hapatabad, Peshawar. Tel: 091
-9217463, Fax: 091-9217464
Page 2 of 2

Ranolia Hydro (17 MW)

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Ranolia Hydro (17 MW)

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

SHYDO

SARHAD HYDEL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION

Subject: 17 MW Ranolia Hydropower Project, District Kohistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-

1. I, Wajid Nawaz Khan, Project Manager Ranolia Hydropower project of

2. I, certify that the documents-in-support attached with this application are

3. A BANK DRAFT in the sum of Rupees n'27- if being the non-refundable

(ENGR.I. WAJID N WAZ KHAN)

SHYDO House Plot No 38-B, Phase-V Hayatabad Peshawar. Phone 091-9217463

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

For and on behalf of

(ENGR. BAHADUR SHAH)

38-B2, Phase-V, Hayatabad, Peshawar Tel' 091-9271329, Fax' 091-9211988

us 16 408541:00 &0006677770339000010 RANOLIA

Name of Company: Sarhad Hydel Development Organization (SHYDO)

Authorization from Board Resolution /

Maximum Net Head-

4 Technology: Francis, Pelton, etc. Size,

ESSA (Environmental and Social Approval Letter

8. Resettlement issues No Settled

EIA and land

and other duties at

10. Infrastructure development Construction of access

road (Copy provided).

Please provide power

Interconnection with National Grid purchaser letter of

Project cost, information regarding

13. Project schedule, expected life months, extended to

44 months. Project life

14. Peaking/base load operation Base load

Load flow and

17. Details provided in the

(1) In this Licence:

a. -Act- means the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of

(1) The location, size, technology, interconnection arrangements technical limits.

The Licensee shall conform to the environmental standards as may be prescribed by

( I ) The obligation of the licensee to provide information to the Authority shall be

Sarhad Hydel Development

• Low Head Hydropower turbines

7. Operation Record New Plant to be

The Net Capacity of the Licensee's Generation Facility

Note: These are indicative figures provided by the Licensee.

Interconnection Arrangement with National Grid for Power Dispersal of the

i. Objectives of the Organization 1

ii. Role of SHYDO 1

iii. SHYDO Organization 2

i. Small Hydel Potential Sites 3

ii. Medium / Large Hydropower Systems 3

iii. Feasibility Studies completed 4

iv. Hydropower Projects completed 4

v. Hydropower Projects under Construction 4

vi. Hydropower Projects ready for Construction 5

vii. Construction Projects under ACTION PLAN 5

viii. Pre-Feasibility studies conducted for Private Sector 6

i. Objectives of the Organization

• Frame schemes related to Generation, Transmission and Distribution of power,

• Advisory body for the Government of KP in power sector matters regarding

• Conducting feasibility studies, surveys of hydel potential sites etc.

• Implementation of Provincial Hydel Power Policy to promote private sector

ii. Role of SHYDO

Adddion.111 turf '>etirtaty MD %Hai , ::;,1,1.0:,toaN f

ADs ADs AD(Hydrology) AD (Geology)

wise breakup of sites is as follows:

ii. Medium/Large Hydropower Systems