Sunteți pe pagina 1din 20

Niedermeyer’s

Electroencephalography
Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields

SIXTH EDITION
Niedermeyer’s
Electroencephalography
Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields

SIXTH EDITION

Donald L. Schomer, MA, MD


Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School
Director, Laboratory for Clinical Neurophysiology
Chief, Comprehensive Epilepsy Program
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts

Fernando H. Lopes da Silva, MD, PhD


Emeritus Professor
Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences
Center of Neurosciences
Faculty of Science
University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Acquisitions Editor: Frances Destefano
Product Manager: Tom Gibbons
Vendor Manager: Bridgett Dougherty
Senior Manufacturing Manager: Benjamin Rivera
Marketing Manager: Brian Freiland
Design Coordinator: Stephen Druding
Production Service: MPS, a Macmillan Company

© 2011 by LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, a WOLTERS KLUWER business.

Two Commerce Square


2001 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
LWW.com

Printed in China

All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced in
any form by any means, including photocopying, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval
system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied
in critical articles and reviews. Materials appearing in this book prepared by individuals as part of
their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields/


[edited by] Donald L. Schomer, Fernando H. Lopes da Silva.—6th ed.
p. ; cm.
Electroencephalography
Rev. ed. of: Electroencephalography/[edited by] Ernst Niedermeyer, Fernando H. Lopes da Silva.
5th ed. c2005.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN-13: 978-0-7817-8942-4 (hardback: alk. paper)
ISBN-10: 0-7817-8942-7 (hardback: alk. paper) 1.
Electroencephalography. I. Niedermeyer, Ernst, 1920– II. Schomer, Donald L. III. Lopes da Silva,
F. H., 1935– IV. Title: Electroencephalography.
[DNLM: 1. Electroencephalography. 2. Central Nervous System Diseases—diagnosis. WL 150]
RC386.6.E43N54 2011
616.8’047547—dc22
2010037480

Care has been taken to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to describe generally
accepted practices. However, the authors, editors, and publisher are not responsible for errors or
omissions or for any consequences from application of the information in this book and make no
warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the currency, completeness, or accuracy of the
contents of the publication. Application of the information in a particular situation remains the
professional responsibility of the practitioner.
The authors, editors, and publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and
dosage set forth in this text are in accordance with current recommendations and practice at the time
of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the
constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check
the package insert for each drug for any change in indications and dosage and for added warnings and
precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new or infrequently
employed drug.
Some drugs and medical devices presented in the publication have Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) clearance for limited use in restricted research settings. It is the responsibility of the health care
provider to ascertain the FDA status of each drug or device planned for use in their clinical practice.
To purchase additional copies of this book, call our customer service department at (800)
638-3030 or fax orders to (301) 223-2320. International customers should call (301) 223-2300.
Visit Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on the Internet: at LWW.com. Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins customer service representatives are available from 8:30 am to 6 pm, EST.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Dedicated to Ernst Niedermeyer, M.D.
for all of the help and inspiration offered to us and
to countless clinical neurophysiologists worldwide
over his truly remarkable career.
Preface to the First Edition

The history of clinical electroencephalography (EEG) has just aspects of lesions and tissue changes, neurology would be
passed the 50-year mark. The age of the pioneers was followed shallow and barren without awareness of the constant fluctua-
by the stage of expansion. What began in a few prestigious cen- tion of functional states in the CNS. Another important sti-
ters gradually became a tool of all academic medical institu- mulus has been the establishment of standards of quality for
tions, and eventually of all major hospitals. In more recent electroencephalographers and EEG laboratories.
years, EEG even invaded the private offices of practicing neurol- In these times of challenge, a review of the state of affairs in
ogists and other specialists interested in central nervous system EEG seems to be appropriate. Such thoughts have prompted the
(CNS) disease. genesis of this large one-volume textbook, which, by its mere
From this perspective, the history of clinical EEG looks like size, sets itself apart from the group of smaller introductory
the “via triumphalis” of a buoyantly dynamic new subspecialty. textbooks and from the huge multivolume handbook. The one-
The elucidation of the electrophysiologic process underlying volume character of the book symbolizes the spirit of unity that
epileptic seizure disorders and a variety of other CNS dysfunc- should reign among clinical electroencephalographers, basic
tions was indeed a unique achievement made possible by the science researchers, and the workers in the field of compu -
new method. The original intention of the founder of clinical terized data analysis.
EEG, Hans Berger, had been the exploration of mental and psy- One author can hardly undertake such a task alone. For this
chological processes, and even in this domain the yield has been reason, we have reached out across the ocean for collaboration.
substantial. Moreover, electroencephalographers have not con- It became clear, however, that a two-man effort would not
fined themselves to the spontaneous wave patterns of the brain; suffice to cover the entire field in the relatively short working
forms of EEG data analysis with the aid of computers were period of 2 years. We solicited for assistance and found a
introduced in order to demonstrate evoked and event-related wonderful group of contributors in various special areas. Above
potentials and to investigate the wealth of frequencies that con- all, coverage of the fields of neurophysiology and neurophar-
stitute the EEG. In the search for the sources of EEG generation, macology has depended most heavily on the assistance of
the brain tissue became the target of exploration. prestigious specialists.
Depth electrodes became one of the most important tools of Attempts at synthesis have not been the goal of this book.
experimental neurophysiologists, who also investigated the sin- Instead the reader will find a more individualistic approach
gle neuron using microelectrodes. The implantation of depth from which the personal basic philosophy of each author can be
electrodes in the human brain has aided in the evaluation of derived. No effort has been made to achieve strict standardiza-
chronic epileptics considered candidates for seizure surgery. tion of symbols and terminology; as an example, frequencies
This impressive progress, however, has been counterbal- are described in various terms (10 cps, 10/sec, 10 Hz, etc.).
anced by signs of pessimism, fatigue, and resignation. A certain There is also some overlap between certain chapters; we feel
malaise has inched its way into the hearts of thousands of elec- that the reader will benefit from the presentation of a given
troencephalographers who have started to feel the grip of stag- topic as seen from two somewhat different viewpoints.
nation. Generation of EEG potentials has proved to be A piece of technical information might be worthwhile.
extremely complex and difficult to understand; the feeling of Unless the filter setting is specifically indicated in the illus-
doing pragmatically useful work with an ill-understood trations of EEG tracings, a time constant between 0.15 and
method has been depressing to many workers in the field. The 0.5 seconds was used (above 0.4 seconds when slow frequencies
pragmatists have further suffered from the limitations of EEG played a major role). The use of “muscle filters” was avoided.
as a method of localization of cerebral lesions. These feelings We have tried to combine didactic and academic elements in
have been nourished by the phenomenal achievements of non- this book. Hence, trainees as well as seasoned professionals in
invasive radionuclear and radiologic scanning methods; this the field will, we hope, find what they are searching for. This
progress of new methods in the field of structural diagnosis has dual approach does mean that some parts of the book require
been a matter of concern for many electroencephalographers. greater sophistication of the reader than do others.
A more real danger, perhaps, is presented by the poorly trained Acknowledgments for invaluable help in this undertaking
colleagues who are tarnishing the image of EEG. come from the depth of our hearts. Mr. Braxton Dallam
In reality, however, these challenges present a stimulus for Mitchell, President of Urban & Schwarzenberg in Baltimore,
the electrophysiologic field. The function-oriented aspects of Maryland, deserves the honor of having been the initiator of
neurologic sciences will always be of paramount significance. this book. His encouragement has been very much appreciated.
The loss of function-oriented neurology would foreshadow the Detlev Moos has coordinated the production of this book with
death of neurology. With all due respect for the structural care and efficiency; Suzanne Lohmeyer has copyedited and

vi
Preface vii

indexed it well; and Nan Tyler, Carola Sautter, and Victoria physiology, Dr. A Earl Walker (presently of Albuquerque, New
Doherty at the publisher’s Baltimore office assisted with their Mexico), deserve special gratitude.
experience. In the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Gratitude is expressed (by F.L.S.) to professor Dr. W. Storm
Maryland, the technical staff of the laboratory deserves great von Leeuwen, Dr. G. Wieneke, and Dr. K. Van Hulten (Utrecht
praise: Mrs. Judy Nastalski, R. EEG T. and chief technologist, University Hospital), Mr. N.J.I. Mars (Twente University of
Mr. Eric DeShields, Mrs. Debbie Reichenbach, R. EEG T., Technology), and Mr. A. Van Rotterdam (Institute of Medical
Miss Sharon Vaughan, Mrs. Kathleen Daniecki, R. EEG T., Physics, Utrecht) for their advice and encouragement. The high
Mrs. Cindy Haywood, and Miss Kim Rimel. How deeply the professional competence of Mrs. Ada Van Schaik and Mr. Nico
electroencephalographer depends on the quality of the record- Haagen (Institute of Medical Physics, Utrecht) in their fields of
ings and the dedication of the technologists! Truly invaluable secretarial work and artwork was of invaluable help.
was the secretarial assistance of Mrs. Catherine Bonolis. The Heartfelt thanks are also expressed to the contributing authors
operation of the laboratory was further aided by the experience of the book; they have naturally become a part of this undertak-
of Mrs. Marie Simpson. Important contributions came from ing. The response of these splendid coworkers was exemplary.
Mr. Joe Dieter, who is responsible for the pictorial artwork, Joseph J. Tecce and Lynn Cattanach, the authors of the article on
Mr. Ron Garret (lettering of tracings), and Mr. Zuhair Kareem contingent negative variation, substituted for a colleague who
and Mrs. Lillian Reich, the staff of Medical Photography. had to step down from his obligations at the last minute. They
Assistance and advice in the clinical EEG field was given made possible the almost impossible when they declared their
most freely by Dr. Gisela Freund, visiting assistant professor at willingness to join the team of coworkers. To them, and to all the
the John Hopkins Hospital EEG Laboratory (1980/81), of the contributing authors of this volume, our deepest thanks.
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Free University
Berlin (Klinikum Westend). E.N.’s principal teacher in the field Ernst Niedermeyer
of EEG, Dr. John R. Knott (presently of Boston, Massachusetts), Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
and the great master of neurosurgery, epileptology, and neuro- Spring 1981
Preface to the Sixth Edition

We would like to express our most sincere thanks to Dr. Ernst this classic volume continue for the years to come and evolve
Niedermeyer for his leadership and direction over the past several with the field as we have seen Dr. Niedermeyer do so success-
years as we have moved forth to produce this sixth edition of the fully over the last 25 years as its senior editor.
textbook that he had first introduced back in 1982. Additionally, This edition has several new features, reflective of the changes
we would like to honor him as he is so richly deserving by renam- that have occurred in our field over the past 5 years since the fifth
ing this book Niedermeyer’s Electroencephalography: Basic edition. More and more, the field of digital recording has
Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. expanded; however, in order to understand some of the short-
Dr. Niedermeyer was born in Vienna, Austria, in 1920. He comings and pitfalls of digital EEG, people need to still address
attended medical school in Austria but, during his third year in the issues of basic analog recording principles. With an increased
medical school, he was witness to the rise of Nazism in use of digital recording, laboratories have collected new and dif-
Germany and Austria and was inducted into the German army ferent “technical artifacts.” We present here an attempt to start a
just prior to the onset of World War II. He was stationed in database for such artifacts in a hope that future editions will
Berlin and was then literally drafted into the medical service continue to expand upon this and offer a fairly complete library
even though he had not yet graduated from medical school. He for beginners interested in our field. As noted in the fifth edition,
said that he was basically treating wounded soldiers coming epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) have continued to mush-
back from the eastern front during the first several years of the room. Similar growth has occurred in the use of EEG monitor-
German invasion of the Soviet Union. He remained there until ing in newborn, cardiac, trauma, and postoperative intensive
Nazi officials learned that his maternal grandmother was Jewish care units. With the significant advances in wireless communica-
which, according to German law, made him an “undesirable.” tion and easy access to the Internet, such recordings can also be
However, because of his medical background, he was not viewed and transmitted locally virtually instantaneously and can
interned but rather was sent to Normandy. He mentioned that allow well-trained clinical neurophysiologists to see and opine
he was, as were many of the soldiers in Normandy, well aware of about patients’ conditions on a very time-relevant basis.
the coming invasion by the Allied forces and he looked upon Hopefully, as future generations may show, this ability will sig-
the day of the invasion as one of his “happiest.” He said he was nificantly influence our patients’ outcomes. Similarly, the field of
wounded during the invasion and was taken as a POW by the intraoperative clinical neurophysiology for spinal cord function,
American forces taking part in the invasion. He was sent back as cranial nerve function, and cranial vascular therapies has con-
a POW to Kansas where he remained and served out the rest of tinued to evolve along with the wireless and Internet communi-
the war as the prison camp doctor. He returned to Austria fol- cations. This has allowed for close monitoring of neurologic
lowing cessation of fighting and finished his medical school and function during critical periods of operations, again with a time
stayed on in Austria, interested in and learning neurology/psy- course that allows for corrective actions to be taken on a mean-
chiatry. He was introduced into clinical neurophysiology ingful time frame.
through some of the historical works in neurophysiology that We have reorganized the text regarding normal EEG and
had been conducted in Europe prior to World War II, including epilepsy to more closely follow the normal aging patterns. We
the work of Hans Berger. He became a clinical neurophysiology have continued to present some of the more classical chapters
addict and was offered a training position at the University of that have evolved over years on evoked potentials and routine
Iowa with Dr. John Knott. He took that position and stayed electroencephalography, including EEG in common neuro-
with Dr. Knott for a number of years but was then offered a logic, metabolic, and heredito-degenerative diseases. We have
position to work with Dr. A. Earl Walker at the Johns Hopkins added and updated chapters and text regarding automated and
Hospital, Baltimore. He continued to do his clinical and basic specialized mathematics-based analysis techniques to try to
science research at Hopkins, where his career blossomed and he keep up with this rapidly expanding field. We will continue to
became well known in the field. He has been an inspiration to update these techniques in future editions. We have included a
many trainees and colleagues, both at Johns Hopkins and chapter on linking clinical neurophysiology to other investiga-
worldwide. Many of our colleagues have come to know him tive techniques such as functional MRI. We have updated the
through his kindness and his willingness to personally take an chapter on magnetoencephalography to, again, reflect the sig-
interest in their research and to make recommendations and nificant changes that have taken place, both from a technical
suggestions about directions for further study. His knowledge and a clinical perspective, in this field. The last several chapters
of the field is legendary and his personality is truly “old world” of this textbook attempt to present an overview of clinical neu-
in the best sense of the term. It is our most sincere desire that rophysiology research that intersects with many other aspects of

viii
Preface ix

the realm of brain sciences such as consciousness and cognitive have offered tremendous help and support in the technical
processing. aspects of getting the chapters organized and together and for
We would like to encourage the readers of these words and Tom Gibbons from Lippincott and all those who have helped
this text to please let us know if they are aware of other areas of again in getting the textbook prepared for publication. Again, in
interest that could or should be involved in future editions of the words of Dr. Niedermeyer, “many, many thanks.”
this textbook that reflect either oversights on our part or are
harbingers of future development. Finally, we thank all of the Donald L. Schomer
authors and coauthors of the chapters of this book for their Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
tremendous effort in keeping this textbook relevant to our field.
Special thanks go to Fran Destefano and Franny Murphy who

ix
Contributors

Florin Amzica, Ph.D. Sudhansu Chokroverty, M.D., F.R.C.P.


Associate Professor of Stomatology Professor of Neuroscience
Montreal University Seton Hall University
Montreal, Canada South Orange, NJ
Clinical Professor of Neurology
Mary Repole Andriola, M.D.
Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics
New Brunswick, NJ
Director, Divisions of Child Neurology, Clinical Neurophysiology
Professor and Co-chair of Neurology
and Pediatric Epilepsy
Program Director, Sleep Medicine and Clinical Neurophysiology
SUNY at Stony Brook
New Jersey Neuroscience Institute at JFK Medical Center
Stony Brook, NY
Edison, NJ
Helen Barkan, M.D., Ph.D.
Nathan E. Crone, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Neurology
Associate Professor of Neurology
Upstate Medical University Hospital
Johns Hopkins University
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Attending
Syracuse, NY
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Gerhard Bauer, M.D. Baltimore, MD
Professor of Neurology
Edgar dePeralta, M.D.
Medical University Innsbruck
Fellow in Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology
Innsbruck, Austria
State University of New York Upstate
Richard Bauer, M.D., M.Sc. Syracuse, NY
Oberarzt, Department of Neurosurgery
Frank W. Drislane, M.D.
Medical University Innsbruck
Professor of Neurology
Innsbruck, Austria
Harvard Medical School
Robert L. Beach, M.D., Ph.D. Neurologist
Professor of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center
Upstate Medical University Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Director, Epilepsy Program and EEG Laboratories Boston, MA
Upstate Medical University Hospital
Barbara Ann Dworetzky, M.D.
Syracuse, NY
Assistant Professor of Neurology
Steve Bild, R. EEG/ EP T., C.N.I.M. Harvard Medical School
Manager of Clinical Services, EEG/Evoked Potentials Lab Chief, Division of Epilepsy, EEG, and Sleep Neurology
Rush University Medical Center Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Chicago, IL Boston, MA
Gastone G. Celesia, M.D. Günter Edlinger, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Professor of Neurology (Retired) CEO
Loyola University of Chicago g.tec Medical Engineering GmbH
Chicago, IL Schiedlberg, Austria
Bernard S. Chang, M.D., M.M.Sc. Jonathan Charles Edwards, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Neurology Associate Professor of Neurosciences
Harvard Medical School Director, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center and Clinical
Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Neurophysiology Laboratories
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Medical University of South Carolina
Boston, MA Charleston, SC
Keith H. Chiappa, M.D. Christian E. Elger, M.D., F.R.C.P.
Associate Professor of Neurology Professor of Epileptology
Harvard Medical School University of Bonn
Director, Electroencephalography Laboratory Head, Department of Epileptology
Massachusetts General Hospital University of Bonn Medical Centre
Boston, MA Bonn, Germany

x
Contributors xi

Ronald G. Emerson, M.D. Richard A. Hrachovy, M.D.


Professor of Clinical Neurology Professor of Neurology
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Baylor College of Medicine
Attending Neurologist Medical Director of Neurophysiology
New York Presbyterian Hospital St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital
Columbia University Medical Center Houston, TX
New York, NY
Aatif M. Husain, M.D.
Charles M. Epstein, M.D. Department of Neurology
Professor of Neurology Duke University Medical Center and Neurodiagnostic Center
Emory University School of Medicine Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Emory Healthcare Durham, NC
Atlanta, GA
Kai Kaila, Ph.D.
Bruce J. Fisch, M.D. Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences
Professor of Neurology Neuroscience Center
University of New Mexico University of Helsinki
Director, Neurodiagnostic Laboratories and MEG Center Helsinki, Finland
University of New Mexico Hospital
Stiliyan Kalitzin, M.D.
Albuquerque, NM
Image Sciences Institute
John N. Gaitanis, M.D. University Medical Center Utrecht
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics, Clinical Utrecht, The Netherlands
Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University
Anton Kamp
Director of Pediatric Epilepsy
Biological Centre
Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children’s Hospital
University of Amsterdam
Providence, RI
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ali Gorji, M.D.
Andres M. Kanner, M.D.
Institute for Physiology
Professor of Neurological Sciences and Psychiatry
Münster University
Rush Medical College at Rush University
Münster, Germany
Director, Laboratories of EEG and Video-EEG-Telemetry
Jean Gotman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Epilepsy Section
Professor Rush University Medical Center
Montreal Neurological Institute Chicago, IL
McGill University
Peter W. Kaplan, M.B., F.R.C.P.
Montreal, Québec, Canada
Department of Neurology
Riitta Hari, M.D., Ph.D. Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Academy Professor Baltimore, MD
Brain Research Unit, Low Temperature Laboratory
Andrew D. Krystal, M.D., M.S.
Aalto School of Science and Technology
Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Espoo, Finland
Director, Quantitative EEG Laboratory
Consultant
Director, Insomnia and Sleep Research Laboratory
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology
Duke University School of Medicine
HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital
Durham, NC
Helsinki, Finland
Ekrem Kutluay, M.D.
Adam L. Hartman, M.D.
Associate Professor of Neurology
Assistant Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics
Medical College of Wisconsin
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Milwaukee, WI
Attending Physician
Johns Hopkins Hospital Emma Laureta, M.D.
Baltimore, MD Assistant Professor of Neurology
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Bin He
Attending
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for
Montefiore Medical Center
Neuroengineering
New York, NY
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN Alan D. Legatt, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Neurology
Susan T. Herman, M.D.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Assistant Professor of Neurology
Director of Intraoperative Neurophysiology
Harvard Medical School
Montefiore Medical Center
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
New York, NY
Boston, MA
xii Contributors

Ronald P. Lesser, M.D. Ernst Niedermeyer, M.D.


Professor of Neurology and Neurosurgery Professor Emeritus of Neurology and Neurological Surgery
Johns Hopkins University Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, MD
Douglas R. Nordli, Jr., M.D.
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Pediatrics
Emeritus Professor Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Center of Neurosciences Lorna S. and James P. Langdon Chair of Pediatric Epilepsy
Faculty of Science Children’s Memorial Hospital
University of Amsterdam Chicago, IL
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Marc R. Nuwer, M.D., Ph.D.
François Mauguière, M.D. Professor of Neurology
Head, Department of Functional Neurology and Epileptology UCLA School of Medicine
Lyon University and Lyon Federative Institute of Neuroscience Department Head
Neurological Hospital Clinical Neurophysiology
Lyon, France Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, CA
Douglas Maus, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Neurology Trudy D. Pang, M.D., M.M.Sc.
SUNY Downstate Medical Center Instructor in Neurology
State University of New York at Brooklyn Harvard University
New York, NY Staff Neurologist
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Christoph M. Michel, M.D.
Boston, MA
Functional Brain Mapping Laboratory
Neurology Clinic and Department of Basic Neuroscience Alvaro Pascual-Leone, M.D., Ph.D.
University Hospital Professor of Neurology
University of Geneva Harvard Medical School
Geneva, Switzerland Director, Department of Neurology
Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Eli M. Mizrahi, M.D.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Chair, Department of Neurology
Boston, MA
Professor of Neurology and Pediatrics
Peter Kellaway Section of Neurophysiology, Department of Neal S. Peachey, M.D., Ph.D.
Neurology Professor of Ophthalmology
Section of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff for Research
Houston, TX Cleveland VA Medical Center
Cleveland, OH
Solomon L. Moshé, M.D.
Professor of Neurology Pediatrics, and Neuroscience Gert Pfurtscheller, Ph.D.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine Emeritus Professor
Director, Pediatric Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology Laboratory of Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCI-Lab)
Montefiore Medical Center Institute for Knowledge Discovery
New York, NY Graz University of Technology
Graz, Austria
Janet M. Mullington, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Neurology Rodney A. Radtke, M.D.
Harvard University Professor of Neurology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Duke University
Boston, MA Medical Director
Duke Hospital Sleep Disorder Center
Christa Neuper, Ph.D.
Duke University Hospital
Professor
Durham, NC
Institute of Psychology
University of Graz James J. Riviello, Jr., M.D.
Head of Institute George Peterkin Endowed Chair in Pediatrics
Laboratory of Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCI-Lab) Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology
Institute for Knowledge Discovery Baylor College of Medicine
Graz University of Technology Director, Epilepsy and Neurophysiology Program
Graz, Austria Director, Neurocritical Service, Section of Neurology
Chief of Neurophysiology
Texas Children’s Hospital
Houston, TX
Contributors xiii

Alexander Rotenberg, M.D., Ph.D. William O. Tatum IV, D.O.


Assistant Professor of Neurology Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School Mayo School of Medicine
Attending Staff Physician, Neurology Director, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
Children’s Hospital Mayo Clinic and Hospital
Boston, MA Jacksonville, FL
Erik Rumpl, M.D. Barbara Tettenborn, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Neurology Chair, Department of Neurology
Landeskrankenhaus Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Klagenfurt, Austria St. Gallen, Switzerland
Johannes Gutenberg University
Donald L. Schomer, M.A., M.D.
Mainz, Germany
Professor of Neurology
Harvard Medical School Ab van Rotterdam, Ph.D.
Director, Laboratory for Clinical Neurophysiology Senior Researcher (Retired)
Chief, Comprehensive Epilepsy Program Radiobiological Laboratory
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Radiobiological Institute TNO
Boston, MA Rijswijk, The Netherlands
Margitta Seeck, M.D. Sampsa Vanhatalo, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor Department of Clinical Neurophysiology
Director of the EEG and Epilepsy Unit Children’s Castle
University Hospital of Geneva Helsinki University Central Hospital
Geneva, Switzerland Helsinki, Finland
Megan Selvitelli, M.D. Juha Voipio, Ph.D.
Maine Medical Partners Neurology Professor of Biological and Environmental Sciences
Scarborough, Maine University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Erw in-Josef Speckmann, M.D.
Professor Emeritus Thoru Yamada, M.D.
Institute of Physiology (Neurophysiology) Professor of Neurology
University of Münster Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
Münster, Germany University of Iowa
Director, Division of Clinical Electrophysiology
Cornelis Jan Stam, M.D.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology
Iowa City, IA
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, The Netherlands Malcolm Yeh, M.D.
Associate Clinical Professor of Neurology
Travis R. Stoub, Ph.D.
Division of Clinical Electrophysiology
Assistant Professor of Neurological Sciences
Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
Affiliated Scientist
University of Iowa
Rush University Medical Center
Staff Neurologist
Chicago, IL
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Takeo Takahashi, M.D. Iowa City, IA
Yaotome Clinic
Sendai, Japan
Contents

Preface to the First Edition vi 19 Cerebrovascular Diseases and EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351


Barbara Tettenborn, Ernst Niedermeyer, and Donald L. Schomer
Preface to the Sixth Edition viii
Contributors x 20 Dementia and EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
Cornelis Jan Stam

Part I Basic Principles 21 Metabolic Disorders and EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 395


Trudy Pang, Megan Selvitelli, Donald L. Schomer, and Ernst Niedermeyer
1 Historical Aspects of EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 22 EEG and Craniocerebral Trauma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411
Ernst Niedermeyer and Donald L. Schomer Erik Rumpl
2 Neurophysiologic Basis of EEG and DC Potentials . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 Anoxia, Coma, and Brain Death . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435
Erwin-Josef Speckmann, Christian E. Elger, and Ali Gorji Peter W. Kaplan and Gerhard Bauer
3 Cellular Substrates of Brain Rhythms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 24 The EEG in Patients with Migraine and Other
Florin Amzica and Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
Forms of Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457
4 Dynamics of EEGs as Signals of Neuronal Populations: Ernst Niedermeyer and Donald L. Schomer
Models and Theoretical Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
Part IV Clinical EEG in Epilepsy
5 Biophysical Aspects of EEG and Magnetoencephalogram and Related Disorders
Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva With an Appendix by Ab Van Rotterdam 25 Seizures and Epilepsies in the Preterm and Term Neonate ... 465
Emma Laureta, Eli M. Mizrahi, and Solomon L. Moshé
6 Analog Signal Recording Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Charles M. Epstein 26 Seizures and Epilepsy in Infants to Adolescents . . . . . . . . . . . . 479
Douglas R. Nordli, Jr., James J. Riviello, Jr., and Ernst Niedermeyer
7 Digital EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
Douglas Maus, Charles M. Epstein, and Susan T. Herman 27 Epilepsy in Adults and the Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541
Bernard S. Chang, Donald L. Schomer, and Ernst Niedermeyer
8 Polarity and Field Determinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
Bruce J. Fisch 28 Convulsive Status Epilepticus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563
Frank W. Drislane, Susan T. Herman, and Peter W. Kaplan

Part II Normal EEG 29 Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595


Frank W. Drislane, Peter W. Kaplan, and Susan T. Herman
9 Normal EEG and Sleep: Preterm and Term Neonates . . . . . . . 153 30 Anticipating Seizures Based on EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 645
Eli M. Mizrahi, Solomon L. Moshé, and Richard A. Hrachovy
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva and Stiliyan Kalitzin
10 Normal EEG and Sleep: Infants to Adolescents . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 31 Nonepileptic Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 659
James J. Riviello, Jr., Douglas R. Nordli, Jr., and Ernst Niedermeyer
Megan Selvitelli, Trudy Pang, Donald L. Schomer, and Ernst Niedermeyer
11 Normal EEG and Sleep: Adults and Elderly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
Bernard S. Chang, Donald L. Schomer, and Ernst Niedermeyer
Part V Complementary and Special Techniques
12 Activation Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Takeo Takahashi and Keith H. Chiappa 32 Nasopharyngeal, Anterotemporal,
13 Artifacts of Recording . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 and Sphenoidal Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 669
Andres M. Kanner, Travis Stoub, and Steve Bild
Barbara Dworetzky, Susan Herman, and William O. Tatum IV
33 Intracranial Monitoring: Depth, Subdural,
Part III Clinical EEG: General and Foramen Ovale Electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 677
Margitta Seeck, Donald L. Schomer, and Ernst Niedermeyer
14 Patterns of Unclear Significance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 34 Electrocorticography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715
Jonathan Charles Edwards and Ekrem Kutluay Marc R. Nuwer
15 EEG of Degenerative Disorders of the Central 35 Principles and Techniques for Long-Term EEG Recording
Nervous System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 (EMU, ICU, Ambulatory) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725
John Gaitanis Jean Gotman, Marc Nuwer, and Ronald G. Emerson
16 The EEG in Congenital Malformations of Cortical 36 Infraslow EEG Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 741
Development, Neurocutaneous Disorders, Cerebral Palsy, Sampsa Vanhatalo, Juha Voipio, and Kai Kaila
Autism/Mental Retardation, and ADHD/Learning 37 High-Frequency EEG Activity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749
Disabilities of Childhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 Jean Gotman and Nathan E. Crone
Mary Repole Andriola
38 Intraoperative Evoked Potential Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 767
17 Brain Tumors and Other Space-Occupying Lesions . . . . . . . . 321 Alan D. Legatt
Adam L. Hartman and Ronald P. Lesser
39 Monitoring EEG during Carotid Surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 787
18 The EEG in Inflammatory CNS Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 Thoru Yamada and Malcolm Yeh
Robert L. Beach, Helen Barkan, and Edgar DePeralta

xiv
Contents xv

40 Polygraphy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 809 50 Neurocognitive Processes and the EEG/MEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1083


Anton Kamp, Gert Pfurtscheller, Günter Edlinger, Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
and Fernando H. Lopes da Silva

41 Polysomnography: Technical and Clinical Aspects . . . . . . . . . 817 Part VIII EEG and Neurocognitive Functions
Sudhansu Chokroverty, Rodney Radtke, and Janet Mullington
51 Psychiatric Disorders and EEG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1113
42 Magnetoencephalography: Methods and Applications . . . . . . 865 Andrew D. Krystal
Riitta Hari
52 Technical Aspects of Transcranial Magnetic
Part VI EEG: Neuropharmacology and Anesthesia and Electrical Stimulation of the Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1129
Alan D. Legatt, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, and Alexander Rotenberg
43 EEG, Drug Effects, and Central Nervous System Poisoning . . 901 53 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS):
Gerhard Bauer and Richard Bauer
Clinical Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1139
Alexander Rotenberg and Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Part VII Evoked Potentials and Event-Related EEG
Phenomena Part IX Computer-Assisted EEG Analysis
44 Event-Related Potentials: General Aspects of 54 EEG Analysis: Theory and Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147
Methodology and Quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923 Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
55 EEG Mapping and Source Imaging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1179
45 EEG Event-Related Desynchronization (ERD) Christoph M. Michel and Bin He
and Event-Related Synchronization (ERS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 935 56 Computer-Assisted EEG Pattern Recognition
Gert Pfurtscheller and Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
and Diagnostic Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1203
46 Visual Evoked Potentials and Electroretinograms . . . . . . . . . . 949 Fernando H. Lopes da Silva
Gastone G. Celesia and Neal S. Peachey
57 EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227
47 Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEPs) Gert Pfurtscheller and Christa Neuper
and Other Auditory Evoked Potentials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 975 58 Multimodal Monitoring of EEG and Evoked Potentials . . . . 1237
Gastone G. Celesia Gert Pfurtscheller
48 Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials: Normal Responses,
Abnormal Waveforms, and Clinical Applications
in Neurologic Diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1003 Index 1243
François Mauguière

49 Evoked Potentials in Children and Infants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1057


Aatif M. Husain
Part I Basic Principles
CHAPTER

Historical Aspects of EEG


ERNST NIEDERMEYER AND DONALD L. SCHOMER 1
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRICAL PHENOMENA electricity) and placed the emphasis on physics—on his “pile,”
the first battery (around 1800). This bimetallic pile was a gen-
Thales from Miletos has been credited with the discovery of erator capable of producing a steady flow of electricity. Volta’s
static electricity produced by friction (rubbing fur or glass with view more or less prevailed in this hotly debated argument. The
silk). He was one of the pre-Socratic “natural philosophers” of laws governing flowing electricity were soon discovered by
Greece (around 620–550 BC) and considered water the origin Georg Ohm in 1827.
of all things. Thus, friction was recognized as the generator of a Nevertheless, Galvani’s belief in “animal electricity” was not
phenomenon that derived its name from the Greek work “elec- lost with other discarded false ideas. There still remained the
tron,” which stands for amber. This discovery fell into a dor- nagging question of an active electrical contribution of animal
mant stage for more than two millennia. muscle tissue.
Around 1600, William Gilbert began to study the electrical
properties of various substances, and Otto von Guericke
(1602–1686) invented the friction machine to create electrical BEGINNINGS OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
fields. This machine eventually found its way into doctors’
offices and even university hospitals. Its electrical field would The introduction of the galvanometer has been associated
make a patient’s hair stand up, creating a strong impression on chiefly with the name of Nobili in Florence; this instrument was
a psychologically gullible patient. These friction machines now refined in 1858 by William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) in
ornament high school laboratories and technical museums. In England (O’Leary and Goldring, 1976). These galvanometers
the 17th and 18th centuries, the friction machine taught invalu- would faithfully demonstrate continuous electrical currents
able lessons on attraction and repulsion of charged bodies, on and their variations in intensity but failed in the detection of
conductors and nonconductors, and on the rather questionable instantaneous electrical phenomena.
dualism of positive and negative electricity. Carlo Matteucci (1811–1868) in Bologna and Emil Du Bois-
A new and very important piece of electrical equipment Reymond (1818–1896) in Berlin became the major proponents of
entered the scene in 1746 when the Leyden jar was introduced an electrophysiologically based physiology of the nervous system.
by Pieter van Musschenbroek (following the earlier work of (The French name of Du Bois-Reymond indicates the Huguenot
Ewald von Kleist). This invention resulted in the storage of elec- origin of this Prussian investigator.) Du Bois-Reymond coined the
tricity, and its upshot, the condenser or capacitor, turned into term negative variation for a phenomenon occurring during mus-
an indispensable part of modern electronics. Benjamin cle contraction when the galvanometer indicated an unexpected
Franklin’s bold experiment caught electrical discharges of a decrease in current intensity (O’Leary and Goldring, 1976). This
thunderstorm in a Leyden jar. term was later resurrected in earliest electroencephalogram (EEG)
What the friction machine could generate, the Leyden jar research (Caton, 1875) and with the discovery of the “contingent
could store. Its sudden discharge was used in many experiments negative variation” (Walter, 1964).
(O’Leary and Goldring, 1976). Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894) accurately measured
The role of static electricity in medicine appeared to be for- the velocity of nerve conduction, which had been vastly overes-
gotten for about 150 years and became resurrected with the timated up to that time. The electrodes used in physiologic
introduction of the defibrillating cardioversion by William B. research were improved and made nonpolarizable (Du Bois-
Kouwenhoven and his coworkers in the 1950s and 1960s; this Reymond). The concept of “action current” was introduced by
approach may hold promises for cerebral applications L. Hermann (1834–1919) and thus clarified Du Bois-Reymond’s
(Niedermeyer, 2003a). negative variations found during muscle contraction. Julius
A serious scientific controversy developed in Italy between Bernstein (1839–1917) proposed a membrane theory of nerve
Luigi Galvani (1737–1798), a professor at the University of tissue, which ultimately was elucidated as late as 1939 and the
Bologna, and Alessandro Volta (1745–1832) in the wake of following years by A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley in England.
Galvani’s discovery of frog leg contractions within an electrical Against this background of strongly evolving electrophysiology
circuit and especially in the presence of a thunderstorm (1780). of the nervous system, the first observation of EEG-like electri-
Volta doubted the biologic nature of the contraction (animal cal brain activity took place.

1
2 Part I ■ Basic Principles

CATON: THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT THE Caton also described a few more interesting observations.
ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY OF THE BRAIN He noted that the external surface of the gray matter was posi-
tive in relation to deep structures of the cerebrum. He also
Richard Caton (1842–1926) (Fig. 1.1) was a physician practic- noted that the electric currents of the cerebrum appeared to
ing in Liverpool who became deeply interested in electrophysi- have a relation to underlying function: “When any part of the
ologic phenomena and eventually received a grant from the grey matter is in a state of functional activity, its electric current
British Medical Association to explore electrical phenomena of usually exhibits negative variation.” Thus, Caton has also been
the exposed cerebral hemispheres of rabbits and monkeys. credited with pioneer work on evoked potential. Furthermore,
According to Brazier (1961), Caton presented his findings to the the difference in polarity found between cortical surface and
association on August 24, 1875, and a very short report of 20 deeper areas could be interpreted as the discovery of the “steady
lines subsequently appeared in the British Medical Journal. A potential” (“DC potential”), but it might be wise to refrain from
more detailed report was presented in the same journal in 1877 such statements that cannot be fully supported by the evidence.
on experiments of more than 40 rabbits, cats, and monkeys, the With regard to the fluctuations, Geddes (1987) pointed out that
rabbit having been principally employed. Caton’s galvanometer had a very limited frequency response
Caton used a galvanometer. A beam of light was thrown on range from 0 to 6 Hz.
the mirror of the galvanometer and reflected on a large scale Caton found some measure of success and recognition with
placed on the wall. With this type of visualization, Caton found this work and held the chair of physiology at the University
that “feeble currents of varying direction pass through the mul- College of Liverpool from 1884 to 1891, when he resigned from
tiplier when the electrodes are placed on two points of the this post. Later he became dean of the medical faculty and, in
external surface, or one electrode on the grey matter, and one 1907, mayor (Lord Mayor) of Liverpool. The electrical activity of
on the surface of the skull.” This sentence is regarded as indicat- the brain did not occupy a predominant position in his further
ing the birth of the electrophysiologram because one can endeavors. Even though Caton became an EEG research dropout,
assume that EEG phenomena made the needle move from one his bold work will always remain a milestone in the history of the
direction to the other. (The suffix “gram” naturally is out of electrical activity of the brain. (More information on Caton’s life
place since “graphein” means “to write” and there was no writ- and work is found in Mary Brazier’s (1961) fine account.)
ten recording.) Even though artifacts could have played a major
role, Caton deserves credit for the discovery of the fluctuating EASTERN EUROPEAN STUDIES OF
potentials that constitute the EEG. ELECTRICAL BRAIN ACTIVITY
The time was ripe for further studies of electrical phenomena of
the cerebrum. Concurrent with Caton’s epochal work of 1875,
physiologists of Eastern Europe began to demonstrate their
independent observations and discoveries concerning the brain
and its electrical activity. Another discovery of the 1870s had
an incomparably greater impact on the neuroscientific world
than Caton’s demonstration of electrical activity of the brain.
The capability of the human cerebral cortex to be electrically
stimulated was discovered by G. Fritsch (1838–1927) and Julius
Eduard Hitzig (1838–1907) in a joint study in 1870. According
to O’Leary and Goldring (1976), an unusual observation had
prompted Fritsch in his work: he had observed contralateral
muscle contractions during dressing of an open brain wound in
the Prussian–Danish War of 1864. The work of Fritsch and
Hitzig was furthered by D. Ferrier and G. F. Yeo in 1880, who
performed electrical stimulations of the cerebrum in apes and
also in a patient who was operated on for a brain tumor. The
repercussions of the stimulation studies were considerable since
many investigators of that time held the view that the entire
cerebrum is a homogeneous organ that harbors mental functions.
The response of the cortex to electrical stimulation probably
was a special incentive for the study of its spontaneous electri-
cal phenomena. This incentive was particularly strong in
Eastern Europe, that is, in laboratories of Russian and Polish
Figure 1.1 Richard Caton at the time of his work on the electrical universities. (In spite of the important historical ethnic and
activity of the brain. (From Brazier MAB. A History of the Electrical national differences, the fact cannot be ignored that most of
Activity of the Brain. The First Half-Century. London: Pitman; 1961, with Poland was part of the Czarist Russian Empire throughout the
permission from Macmillan.) 19th century.)

S-ar putea să vă placă și