Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IN
1
REPORTABLE
VERSUS
WITH
J U D G M E N T
RANJAN GOGOI, J.
Digitally signed by
VINOD LAKHINA
Date: 2017.06.19
100 KW; (ii) high tension (HT) at 11,000 voltage (11 KV)
provided.
17.5% surcharge.
following effect.
taken note of along with the fact that the Board in its
1995.
terms:
Furnace consumers:
follows:
voltages”.
ground that after the 2003 Act had come into force with
not done. The High Court also took the view that the
the fact that the arc furnace industries i.e. the writ
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
16
surcharge leviable.
not detain the Court. Not only the levy of surcharge has
Appellate Tribunal.
much lower amount than what would work out on the basis
that too by the Expert Body which has been upheld by the
(Supply) Act, 1948 in M/s Bisra Stone Lime Co. Ltd. vs.
....................,J.
(RANJAN GOGOI)
....................,J.
(NAVIN SINHA)
NEW DELHI
JUNE 19, 2017
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
1
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6625-6626/2013, CIVIL APPEAL NO.6289-6290/2013,
CIVIL APPEAL NO.6291-6292/2013, CIVIL APPEAL NO.6276/2013, CIVIL
APPEAL NO.6269/2013
For parties:
Mr. Mohit D. Ram, AOR
costs.