Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
We are a group of retired civil servants who came together last year because of our concern
over what we saw as an alarming decline in the secular, democratic, and liberal values
enshrined in our Constitution. As citizens who have had a close association with issues of
public policy and governance and the administering of our Constitution, we felt it was
necessary to speak out against the rise in authoritarian and majoritarian tendencies, the
abuse of political power and the increasing disregard of constitutional values. We have
issued several Open Letters (sometimes in concert with a group of retired veterans of the
Armed Forces) and have also together with the veterans organized Conclaves on several
issues of public interest. As a group, we are resolutely committed to constitutional values
and principles, and are non-political, whatever the political preferences of individual
members might be.
We feel compelled to write an Open Letter once again, - in what we perceive as the most
brazen display yet of coercive authority by the State.
The arrests of Sudha Bharadwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Vernon Gonsalves, Varavara Rao and
Arun Ferreira and the raids on the residences of Stan Swamy, Kranti Tekula, Naseem and
Anand Teltumbde, all of whom have been in the forefront of the struggle for justice for
Adivasis, Dalits, Muslims, members of the working class and women and children (a struggle
which has been a continuing one irrespective of which Government has been in power) have
been the trigger. They have always used lawful and democratic means in their efforts, and
this series of arrests shows how wilful and arbitrary the State is to intimidate and silence
any signs of dissent and democratic resistance.
Earlier Shoma Sen, Rona Wilson, Mahesh Raut , Surendra Gadling and Sudhir Dhawale were
also arrested under the same charges for inciting violence in the context of Bhima Koregaon,
and the same incident.
The use of draconian laws, which deny access and circumscribe the ability of those arrested
to access protection of their fundamental rights is completely unjustified. The imposition of
this law is a circumvention of the normal processes and allows the flimsiest of evidence to
frame charges and arrest those who are politically inconvenient and may threaten powerful
commercial interests complicit with the State. It is patently obvious that the objective is to
create a climate of fear to deter those in civil society who are critical of the Government’s
treatment of Dalits, Adivasis and other marginalised and dispossessed groups and may be
inclined to take up cudgels on their behalf.
The excuse for such action hinges on a fabricated tale of a “terror” plot against a high
functionary in which these allegedly “urban Naxals” play a role. Incidents quoted refer to
the Elgar Parishad held earlier in the year in Pune, of which the highly respected Justice P.B.
1
Sawant (former Supreme Court Judge and Chairman of the Press Council) was a key
organizer. The vagueness of the allegations, the manner and the timing of the arrests, the
choice of the persons arrested (none of whom were a part of the Bhima Koregaon incident),
the use of a law which has lower standards of evidence required for establishing a ‘prima
facie’ case, all go to show the insidiousness of the intent. The evidence in the public domain
against those arrested appears to be incredible. This is shameful.
The charges made against these respected human rights defenders and intellectuals – as
broadcast by compliant sections of the media - is that they are supporters of subversive
violence, applying to them the newly minted tag of the ‘urban Naxalite’, alleged to be city-
based middle-class supporters of Maoist insurgents. That this tag has been applied to a
group of persons who have always used lawful and democratic means in their efforts is an
example of how wilful and arbitrary the State can be in quelling any signs of dissent and
democratic resistance.
It is evident that these arrests follow a pattern designed by the current dispensation to tag
any dissident or critical intellectual activity as anti-national or seditious or supportive of
secession and terrorism. Ironically, while a ‘Maoist sympathiser’ is treated as a dangerous
terrorist who needs to be incarcerated, a sympathiser of Bajrang Dal or Sanatan Sansthan or
Hindu Mahasabha, who flaunts the agenda of violence and hate, is seen as pursuing a
worthwhile national cause. Coming from a political culture where ministers and legislators
who fete and celebrate murder convicts and perpetrators of mob violence are given political
support and patronage, this perversion of principles is sickening.
3
List of signatories
7
46. Jawhar Sircar IAS (Retd.) Former
Secretary,
Ministry of
Culture, GoI, &
CEO, Prasar
Bharati
47. Dr. K.S. IPS (Retd.) Former Director
Subramanian General, State
Institute of
Public
Administration &
Rural
Development,
Govt. of Tripura
48. Hindal Tyabji IAS (Retd.) Chief Secretary
rank, Govt. of
Jammu &
Kashmir