Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
Copyright
1975.All rightsreserved
ARABIDOPSIS AS A ~3086
GENETIC TOOL
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
G. P. R~dei
Department
of Agronomy,
Universityof Missouri,Columbia,Missouri65201
by CNRS-multi-site on 10/24/05. For personal use only.
SPECIAL FEATURES
III
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
number of ecological variants are available (I, 2); (i) it can be crossed
several species of different basic chromosome numbers (22-25). The major
advantage of Arabidopsis is that it can be subjected to manipulations common
to microorganisms, which are impractical in most other higher plants.
parently the smallest among the higher plants (26), and the DNAcontent
the diploid nuclei is estimated to be 4 x 10~ nucleotide pairs (26) or 0.8
(27), respectively. Thus, many diploid plant species have one or two orders
of magnitude more DNAthan Arabidopsis.
by CNRS-multi-site on 10/24/05. For personal use only.
Because of the characteristic phenotype of the trisomics and the large popula-
tions that can be classified, recombination between selected markers and the
centromere can be studied on a practical scale (7). Double reduction in triplex
tetraploids can also be detected genetically.
In mitosis the homologous chromosomes frequently display some degree of
loose association (4). Whenthe seeds, heterozygous for linked cell or tissue-
specific markers and carrying other flanking genes, are irradiated with X rays,
single and twin spots can be detected on the treated plants. In a few cases
the somatic sectors have given rise to seed-bearing shoots, and the actual ex-
change of markers as expected in somatic recombination has been verified (28,
29). This premeiotic recombination has not been observed to occur sponta-
neously. The frequent association of the exchange with reduced transmission
of the chromosomalstrands involved indicates that the mechanismis not crossing
over. Apparently, the sector formation is due to a reciprocal but unequal translo-
cation type of event, induced at the four-strand stage of mitosis. The cytologically
detected mitotic juxtapositioning of the homologues(4) provides a support for
the.genetic observations. Actually, only a few individuals have been subjected
to complete analysis, yet equally well-documented cases of mitotic marker
exchange are not available in other higher organisms (the body spots of Droso-
phila are not amenable to generative progeny tests).
A genetic method for localization of chromosomal defects or segregation
distorters was developed on the basis of the correlations amongreduced trans-
mission, segregation ratios, and recombination frequency proximal to the defect
(30, 31).
An unusual gametophyte factor without female transmission, yet with a higher
than 50%seed set, has been mappedto linkage group 2. The cytological observa-
tions revealed twin tetrads in the carrier’s ovules, and in cases of reverse orienta-
tion of the meiotic apparatus there was a preferential selection for the basal
megasporecontaining the normal allele (32, 33). In the Cruciferae, certain other
genera commonlydisplay multiple megaspore tetrads (34).
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
ARABIDOPSIS AS A TOOL I 13
Arabidopsis and its relatives are widely spread on the earth, especially in the
northern hemisphere (1). The gene center is probably in western or northwestern
Europe. The most conspicuous variation is in the response of flowering to natural
day-length and temperature regimes (8, II, 35-40).
Induced mutants closely resembling natural ecotypes were observed (9, 41a, 42).
Under laboratory conditions some of the X-ray-induced mutants showed an
extremely high selective advantage in competition with the wild type (9).
Berger (24) attempted 194 different interspecific crosses with various related
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
seed with diploid Arabidopsis (22,.24, 25; G. P. Redei, unpublished), yet hybrid
plants can be obtained if tetraploid Arabidopsis is Used as either the male or
female parent (G. P. R6dei, unpublished). Diploid Cardaminopsis petraea
(2n = 16) also yields sterile offspring with diploid A rabidopsis (25). Thebotanical
literature suggested (43) that Hvlandra is an amphiploid of C. arenosa and A.
thaliana. The experimentally produced amphiploid does not support this hy-
pothesis (25), though it forms semifertile offspring with Hvlandra (G. P. R~dei,
unpublished). Cytological observations indicate that the genera Hvlandra, Car-
daminopsis, and Arabidopsis share homologous chromosomal regions through
some commonancestor(s) (24). The various possible combinations among these
species may yield a continuous series of new chromosomaltypes of plants.
MUTATION
The short life cycle and small size makethe plants attractive for screening and
testing mutagenic agents (see reference 1 for review). Because of its extremely
small nuclear volume, Arabidopsis appears to be the most radiation-resistant
amongthe higher plants (26, 44).
Mailer (45, 46) has developed a procedure whereby the effectiveness
chemical or physical agents can be assessed immediately in the plants grown
from the seeds treated, obviating the. culture of an additional generation. In
the siliques (fruits) of the 1 plants, d ominant and r ecessive l ethals a s well
as chlorophyll-deficient mutants (arranged in a somewhat similar fashion as
the spores in an ascus) can be detected approximately two weeks after ferti-
lization. This methoddoes not reveal a distinction between the direct physio-
logical effects of the mutagens or the nature of the genetic effect, but it is a
fast and economical way to gat,her information on various agents.
An alternative rapid procedure for mutation detection is to score somatic
sectors in mutagen-treated heterozygotes (47-49). Although the majority
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
114 R~OE~
from 10 M~plants are examined, the chance for recovery of one or more mutants
in a particular progeny is reduced to .500, yet according to the cumulative terms
of a binomial there are .623 or .945 chances to recover at least five or three
different mutants, respectively, in the combined populations. The desirable
progeny sizes can be calculated or read from statistical tables (53, 54). If the
size of individual Mz populations is small enough to minimize the repeated
recovery of any mutant produced by the same mutagenic event, the handling
of the families by pedigrees is obviated. The bulk progeny tested will give a
fair representation to the majority of the M1 plants because the Poisson distribu-
tion prevails in the seed withdrawal. Using a "fluctuation test," the independently
occurring mutations can be identified (53, 54). Mutation rate can be expressed,
then, on genomebasis (as used in microbial genetics) by simple determination
of the level of ploidy and the number of cells in the germ line. The number
of the genetically effective cells of the germ line can be deduced from the
segregation ratio in large progenies of individual plants. In Arabidopsis, in the
dry mature seed the germ line is represented by two diploid cells (54-56).
By the use of these procedures, the efficiency of mutant recovery may be
improved by an order of magnitude, and mutation rate can be expressed in
terms valid through phylogenetic boundaries (54, 55, 57).
Arabidopsis provides unique opportunities for the study of reverse mutation--a
phenomenon never demonstrated conclusively in higher plantsS-through the
availability of conditional lethal markers. Millions of multicellular diploid or
polyploid seeds can be easily produced from thiamine auxotrophs. Dominant
.revertants can be then selectively screened as sole survivors in the absence of
thiamine. In the presence of flanking markers, by the heterozygosity and segre-
gation ratio of the survivors, contaminations can be ruled out with absolute
safety. Unless the reversion takes place in the germ line at a single-cell stage,
the segregation ratio is not expected to be 3: 1, rather 3:5 or 3:37, depending
on whether the germ line was at the two- or ten-cell stage, respectively, at
the time of the back mutation (G. P. Rrdei, unpublished). The overwhelming
majority of reverted leaf color mutants gave evidence for the presence of sup-
pressor mutation (52).
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
ARABIDOPSIS
AS A TOOL 115
AUXOTROPHY
four or more loci (G. P. R6dei, unpublished). The nutritional requirement ranges
from absolute to minimal. Practically all the thiamine mutants are indis-
tinguishable from the wild type on properly supplemented media.
Certain alleles at the pyrimidine locus display low or high temperature sensi-
by CNRS-multi-site on 10/24/05. For personal use only.
116 Rl~DEI
ANTIMETABOLITE-RESPONSIVE MUTANTS
6-Azauracil
A large number of different alleles have been isolated in two laboratories at
a variegation locus, im. (81-83, 85, 86, 88). The recessive mutants are involved
in the control of the differentiation of the internal membranesof the plastids.
Within single cells all the plastids are arrested before the formation of thylakoids,
or all absolutely normal chloroplasts are formed as far as electron microscopy
can reveal. The cells displaying the two contrasting phenotypes are distributed
in a nonrandom pattern, simulating high somatic mutability. Progeny of the
different sectors reveals no difference, indicating that the absence or presence
of normal plastids is determined only by a defective regulatory mechanismof
gene function. Under high intensity continuous illumination in the plants that
are homozygous for certain alleles, practically all the cells lack functional chloro-
plasts. Under low light intensity and short daily cycles of illumination, the
mutants can be barely distinguished from the wild type. Homozygotesfor other
alleles may develop normal chloroplasts under all light regimes in the majority
of their cells. The mutants that produce a near albino phenotype can be induced
to produce a more normal appearance by heavy doses of X irradiation (84).
Similarly the analog, 6-azauracil (6AU), whenincorporated in the aseptic culture
media (at the 10-~ Mrange), may lead to a gradual restoration of plastid
differentiation in the late-developing tissues. After a few weeks culture on 6AU,
the mutants may produce two thirds as much leaf pigment as the wild type.
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
~RABIDOPSIS
AS A TOOL 1 17
In the mutant plants grown on the analog, however, the internal structure of
the chloroplasts is strikingly different. Instead of the normally straight arrange-
ment of the lamellae, curly or almost ring-shaped thylakoids are found. The
membranedevelopment seems actually more intense in the mutants so treated
than in the wild type. The abnormal chloroplasts seem to function well in
photosynthesis as shown by the presence of numerous and large starch granules
(82, 87).
Several of the enzymes function normally even in the white tissues; however,
an acid ribonuclease (RNase, 2.7.7.17), orotidylic acid pyrophosphorylase
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
5-Bromodeo x yuridine
5-Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) or 5-bromodeoxycitidine (BrdC) are very
mutagens in Arabidopsis (90a), 5-1ododeoxyuridine (IdU) BrdU, and BrdC
-0
91) promote flower initiation in this plant at very low Concentrations (10
M range). A similar though somewhat lesser effect of 8-azaadenine has also
been observed (79).
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
118 R~DEI
in the dark. In total darkness (after a single 1 hr light period to induce germina-
tion) flower differentiation takes place earlier than under any light regime. This
fact shows that flowering itself is a constitutive process and is negatively con-
trolled under light. The flowering inhibitor seems to be produced only in light,
and all the mutants are concerned with the synthesis or function of an inhibitor(s)
or repressor(s) of the process.
BrdUis without effect in dark cultures, but it returns the phenotype of the
mutants to near wild type under continuous light, and even under short days
it induces fast flowering in all, except in the homozygotesfor the /d alleles.
The incorporation of the deoxynucleoside analogs into the nuclei (92) and DNA
has been shown (16).
Brown(93) has suggested that BrdUand homologues are preferentially incor-
porated into the actively dividing flank meristem cells of the vegetative apex
and thereby temporarily retard mitotic activity of these cells. This retardation
triggers mitotic activity in the central initiation zone. Subsequently, the analog
is removed from the whole apex, and flower differentiation is initiated. His-
tological studies in several species, including Arabidopsis, indicated that flower
development is accompanied by this pattern of apical activity (94).
Flower-inducing material, according to plant physiologists (95), is synthesized
primarily in the leaves rather than in the apex. BrdU is incorporated in all
tissues of the plant and replaces 7-10% of the thymidine residues in DNA.
This substitution is too high to be limited to single gene(s). BrdU-substituted
DNAhas been shown to bind very effectively nonhistone protein(s) of Arabi-
dopsis chromatin. This acid protein(s) seems to be involved in the initiation
of flowering (16). The suggestion was made [on the analogy of the lac system
in Escherichia coli (96)] that if this acid protein (repi’essor) is tightly bound
to DNA,the flowering inhibitor(s) cannot be transcribed. Alternatively one may
hypothesize [on the analogy of the mammalianinterpretation (97)] that inducer
protein(s) may dislodge the histones more easily from the BrdU-DNA.There
is no indication that in this system histone(s) are involved in the inhibition
of flower initiation in light. Actually the involvement of histone is unlikely
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
ARABIDOP$IS AS A TOOL 1 19
on the basis of the dark experiments,since the synthesis of this protein is even
under different conditions of development.
120 R~DEI
the earlier mentioned variegation mutants that resemble hereditary orotic aci-
duria, this is another case where comparative studies may help to understand
the mechanisms when studied in such distant organisms.
Aminoacid-sensitive mutants have recently been identified. The genetic defect
seems to be associated with the regulation of the branched-chain amino acid
path (G. P. R6dei & G. Acedo, unpublished).
PLASTOME GENETICS
With X irradiation, maternally inherited plastid defects have been induced (115).
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
ARABIDOPSIS
AS A TOOL 121
in different ontogenic stages could not be separated in the defective types. The
circumstantial evidence suggested that a large number of plastome sites can
respond to the mutator. The mutability of the chromosomal genes remained
unchanged in the presence of the mutator. The existence of nuclear mutator
genes, specific for the plastids, shows that the autonomyof the plastome is
limited, and most likely the control for the replication of the chloroplast genetic
material resides in the nucleus. On the other hand the plastome can control
characters (leaf shape, fertility, etc) that are commonlydetermined by nuclear
genes (118, 119).
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
Transformation
In the last 15 years L~douxand his collaborators have studied the possibilities
of uptake and processing of macromolecules by the cells of higher organisms.
The main findings with Arabidot)sis as a recipient are only outlined here. Sur-
face-disinfected seeds were germinated for 4 days in tritium-labeled thymidine
(’~HT) or in aHT bacterial DNAof higher buoyant density than that of the
plant. Subsequently, at various stages of development, intact plants or different
organs were extracted and the density profile of the DNAwithin the plant
cell was analyzed in CsC1 gradients in the preparative ultracentrifuge. The
thymidine provided as such was taken up poorly by the plant and did not affect
the density ofArabidopsis DNA.The seeds treated with the foreign DNAhave
readily taken up the bacterial nucleic acid and incorporated it into plant genetic
apparatus. After incubation with E. coil (O: 1.710) or with Streptom),ces coelicolor
DNA(#: 1.730), the extracted plant DNAdisplayed, besides its normal density
peak (O: 1.698), newdensity fractions approaching that of the donors (p: 1.707
and 1.720, respectively). The intermediate density fractions were concentrated
in the cotyledons until flower development when a translocation to the flowers
was observed (121, 122).
When seeds were treated with Microccus lysodeikticus cold DNA(0:1.731)
and the growing plants were fed with :~HT, replication of that heavier than
the normal Arabidopsis DNAwas observed. The foreign DNAwas further traced
by density and labeling in subsequent three or more generations of the plants.
The label provided by 3HT alone was diluted out through the mitoses by the
time of new seed formation, in contrast, 10 50% of the 0.7 ng exogenous DNA
taken up by a seed was still present in the flowers and 1% was detected in
the following generation.
Alkali denaturation did not produce substantial.heterogeneity in the reex-
tracted plant-bacterial DNAcomplex, and only the expected density increase
that is characteristic for single-stranded molecules appeared. Sonication, in
contrast, yielded DNAwith a wide range of density, On the basis of these
experiments it was suggested that the foreign DNAis associated with the plant
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
122 RI~DEI
Transgenosis
The term coined by Doy, Gresshoff & Rolfe (126) was defined as the "transfer
of genetic information from one cell to another, followed by phenotypic expres-
sion." This definition may include gametic union, though it was used in the
context of information transfer by specialized transducer phage from bacteria
to plants. The term "transduction" was avoided in the absence of knowledge
of the mechanism involved. From three main types of experiments actually
only one was performed with haploid Arabidopsis callus, while the others were
done with Lyco19ersicon. Tomatocells died on 2%percent galactose media except
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
when 108 hpgal + particles were added. The gal- or lac + information was useless,
however. Similarly, the survival and growth of tomato callus on lactose media
was observed after the addition of q~8Oplac +. The production of a bacterial
enzyme within the plant cells was ascertained enzymologically and immunologi-
cally. Both tomato and Arabidopsis callus treated with phage ¢80supF+ contain-
ing the suppressor of an amber mutation proved deleterious, indicating that
the UAGcodon in the plants fulfills an essential, positive role. The mechanism
of transfer and the inheritance through the germ line have not been shown.
Technically. it may be feasible to use nucleic acid hybridization techniques to
see whether any DNAwas actually transferred in the process of transgenosis
Annu. Rev. Genet. 1975.9:111-127. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org
and whether isolated phage DNA would accomplish the same results as the
particles. Additional information is required before a comforting evaluation
concerning the meaning for geneticists can be made.
by CNRS-multi-site on 10/24/05. For personal use only.
ACKNOWLEDOMENT
Literature Cited
1. R6dei, G. P. 1970. Arabidopsis thaliana 11. Jones, M. E. 1971. The population
(L.) Heynh. A review of the biology genetics ofArabidopsis thaliana. I. The
and genetics. Bibliogr. Genet. 20(2): breeding system. Heredity 27:39-50
1-151 12. Myerscough,P. J., Marshall, J. K. 1973.
2. R6dei, G. P. 1974. Arabidopsis thaliana. Population dynamics of Arabidopsis
Handbookof Genetics, ed. R. C. King, thaliana (L.) Heynh.strain ’Estland’
2: Chap. 8, 1-51-80. NewYork: Plenufii different densities and nutrient levels.
3. Laibach, F. 1907. Zur Frage nach der New Phytol. 72:595 617
Individualitat der Chromosomenim 13. Laibach, F. 1943. Arabidopsis thaliana
Pflanzenreich. Beih. Bot. Cbl. 1 Abt. (L.) Heynh. als Objekt ftir genetische
22:5-24 und entwicklungsphysiolog~sche Un-
4. Steinitz-Sears, L. M. 1963. Chromo- tersuchungen. Bot. Arch. 44:439 55
some studies in Arabidopsis thaliana. 14. Langridge, J. 1957. The aseptic culture
Genetics 48:483-90 of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.
5. Bouharmont, J. 1969. Evolution of Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 10:243-52
chromosome numbers in Arabidopsis 15. R6dei, G. P. 1965. Genetic blocks in
ol loids. Chromosomes Toda 2: the thiamine synthesis of the angio-
~9~01 ~Y sperm Arabidopsis. Am. J. Bot.-52:
6. R~dei, G. P. 1964. Crossing experiences 834-41
with polyploids. Arabidopsis Inf Serv. 16. R6dei, G. P., Acedo, G., Gavazzi, G.
1:13 1974. Flower differentiation in Arabi-
7. Lee-Chen,S., Steinitz-Sers, L. M. 1967. dopsis. Stadler Genet. Symp. 6:135-68
Location of linkage groups in Arabi- 17. Ziebur, N. K. 1965. Tissue culture.
dopsis thaliana. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. Arabido, psis Inf. Serv. 2:34-35
9:381-84 18. Yokoyama,I(., Jones, W. H. 1965.
8. Laibach, F. 1951. i]ber sommer- und Tissue culture of Arabidopsis thaliana.
winterannuelle Rassen von A rabidopsis Plant. Physiol. 40:LXXVH (Abstr.)
thaliana (L.) Heynh.-Ein Bcitrag zur 19. Shen-Millcr, J., Sharp, W. R. 1966. An
Atiologie der Blt~tenbildung. Beitr. improved mediumfor rapid initiation
Biol. Pflanz. 28:173-210 of Arabidopsis tissue culture from seed.
9. R6dei, G. P. 1962. Supervital mutants Bull, Torrey Bot. Club 93:68-69
of Arabidopsis. Genetics 47:443-60 20. Anand, R. 1966. Preliminary studies on
10. Shape. J. W., Lawrence, M. J. 1971. callus culture of Arabidopsis thaliana.
The breeding system of Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Inf Serv. 3:15
thaliana. Heredity 27:299-302 21. Gresshofl; P. M., Doy, C. M. 1972.
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
124 RI~DEI
25. MOsi~ek, J. 1967. The chromosome notypic stability of growth in the self-
morphology of Arabidopsis thaliana fertilized species, Arabidopsis thaliana.
(L.) Heynh. and some remarks on the Stat. Genet. Plant Breed Nat. Acad
problem of Hylandra suecica (Fr.) ScL, Nat. Res. Counc. Publ. No. 982:
LOve. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 2: 368-94
433-36 41. Lan~ridge, J., Grifting, B. 1959. A study
26. Sparrow, A. H., Price. H. J., Under- of h~gh temperature lesions in Arabi-
brink, A. G. 1972. A survey of DNA dop~is thaliana. .4ust. J. BioL Sei.
content per cell and per chromosome 12:117-35
of prokaryotic and eukaryotic orga- 41a. Reinholz, E. 1947. AuslOsung von
nisms. Brookhaven Syrup. Biol. 23: ROntgen-mutationen bei Arabidopsis
451-94 thaliana (L.) Heynh. und ihre Bedeu-
27. Bennett, M. D. 1972. Nuclear DNA tung ft~r die Pflanzenzt~chtung und
content and minimumgeneration time Evolutionstheorie. Field
T Inf. .4gem
in herbaceous plants. Pro¢. 1~. Soc. Tech. Retd. 1006:1-70
London Set. B 181:109-35 42. McKelvie, A. D. 1963. Studies in the
28. Hirono, Y., ROdei, G. P. 1965. Induced induction of mutations in Arabidopsis
premeiotic exchange of linked markers thaliana (L.) Heynh. Radiat. Bot.
m the angiosperm Arabidopsis. Gene- 3:105-23
tics 51:519-26 43. LiSve, A. 1961. Hylandra-A new genus
29. Hirono, Y., ROdei, G. P. 1965. Concur- of the cruciferae. Sven. Bot, Tidskr.
rent products of premeiotic recombin- 55:211-17
ation. See Ref. 23, 85-90 44. S.parrow, A. H., Schwemmer,S., Bot-
30. Hirono, Y. 1964. A genetic method for tmo, P. J. 1973. Influence of dose,
the localization of chromosome defects. environmental conditions and nuclear
Genetics 50:255 volume on survival times in several
31. Li, S. L. 1968. Genetics of thiamine
metabolism in Arabidopsis. PhDthesis. ~ amma-irradiated species. Int. J. Ra-
iat. Biol. 24:377-88
Univ. Missouri, Columbia. 236 pp. 45. Mtiller, A., 1963. Embryonentest zum
32. ROdei, G. P. 1965. Non-Mendelian Nachweis recessiver Letalfaktoren bei
megagametogenesis in Arabidopsis. Arabidotgsis thaliana, Biol. Zentralbl.
Genetics 51: 857-72 82:133-63
33. ROdei, G. P. 1965. Genetic basis for 46. Miiller, A. J. 1965. On the chimerical
abnormal segregation. See Ref. 33, structure of M~plants. See Ref. 23,
91-99 152-53
34. Vandendries. R. 1909. Contribution ~ 47. Fujii, T. 1964. Radiation effects on
l’histoire du dOveloppementdes cruci- .4rabidopsis thaliana I. Comparative
f~res. Cellule 25:414-59 efficiencies of 3,-rays, fission and 14
35. H~irer, L. 1951. l~ie Vererbung des Me¥ neutrons in somatic mutation.
Bl0halters frt~her und sp~iter som- ,lpn. J. Genet. 39:91-101
mereinjahriger Rassen von Arabidopsis 48. Gichner, T., Veleminsk~,,J., eds. 1965.
thaliana (L.) Heynh.Beitr. Biol. Pflanz. Induction of chlorophyll chimeras by
28:1-35 X-rays and ethyl methanesulfonate in
36. Napp-Zinn, K. 1962. ~Jber die gene- different heterozygous strains of Ara-
Annual Reviews
www.annualreviews.org/aronline
126 R~DEI
108. Jacobs, M., Schwind, F. 1975. Biochem- 120. RObbelen, G. 1959. Untersuchungen
ical ~genetics of Arabidopsis acid fiber die Entwicklung der submikro-
phospnatases: polymorphism, tissue skopischen Chloroplastenstruktur von
expression and genetics of AP1, AP e, Arabidotgsis thaliana. Z. Vererbungsl.
and AP~loci. lsozymes, ed. C. L. Mar- 90:503 6
kert, 4:349-69. NewYork: Academic 121. Ledoux,L., Huart. R., Jacobs, M. 1971.
by CNRS-multi-site on 10/24/05. For personal use only.