Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Seattle University
901 - 12th Avenue
PO Box 222000
Seattle, WA 98122-1090
Program Mission
Developing professional educators who effectively serve adult populations as their teachers, trainers and
leaders
INSTRUCTOR
Dr. Stacey E. Robbins
Office: Loyola 409
Office Hours: By appointment
Phone: 206.220.8257
REQUIRED TEXTS
Required
Merriam, S. & Bierema, L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Optional
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American
Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
CONTENT AREAS
Course Description and Rationale: Survey of the major theories, research, and issues in adult
development and learning with the primary focus on how the theories and issues apply to adult
learning. This is a Core Course for the College of Education. A Core Course provides
foundational skills and knowledge that you will use throughout your program. As a Core Course,
I must address specific content each time I teach this course to ensure consistency. This course is
coordinated through the Master's in Adult Education and Training (AEDT) Program.
Adult education, training, and learning are increasingly emphasized in our society. For many
adults, lifelong learning is now a necessary part of life. While adults participate in various forms
of learning, our society challenges them to adapt to rapid change—changing economies,
workplaces, family structures, and values. And at the same time, many adults must also care for
children and aging parents—and understand their own aging process! Their needs are unique and
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Professionals who work with adults must make ethical, reflective judgments about these issues—
especially in an increasingly diverse society. They should be able to apply adult developmental
and learning theories, including psychosocial, behavioral, social learning, information
processing, and cognitive developmental theory.
This course also fulfills a College of Education (COE) core outcome: "Each professional must
demonstrate an understanding of key human development and learning theory and research for
the particular life stage(s) at which she/he practices as an educator. Each professional must
demonstrate the capacity to apply that knowledge of human development to her/his practice as an
educator."
COURSE VISUAL
•Adult development
Self-
reflection
Discussio
n
INSTRUCTOR POLICIES
Communication
I will check my email regularly. You can email me at any time, but you may not receive a
response outside regular business hours. Generally, emails will be returned within 24 hours.
Business h o u r s are Monday–Friday 9 AM – 5 PM, except holidays.
Page 2
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Grading
Assignments will be returned within 5 business days.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Course Learning Outcomes (CLO)
1. Describe what it means to “learn” in adulthood using one or more models from current
literature and examples from personal experience;
2. Describe major developmental tasks of adulthood using one or more models from current
literature and examples from personal experience;
3. Describe the influence of contextual elements, including culture, on adult learning and
development;
4. Identify societal trends influencing adult learning and development including
demographics, globalization, and technology
5. Analyze the reciprocal relationship between adult learning and adult development; and
6. Analyze professional roles and responsibilities related to fostering learning and
development in adults
This course is delivered entirely online. The course is divided into 8 modules, one for each week.
A module begins on Monday and ends on Sunday at midnight (except for Module 1, which
begins on Wednesday). Assignments are generally due Sundays at midnight.
To succeed in this fully online course you must engage regularly with such technologies as
Page 3
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Canvas, Padlet, Zoom, and others. Some of you will likely encounter these for the first time.
Don’t worry; you are not alone. I’m here to help; please reach out to me if you are still unclear
how to use any of technology.
This course is grounded in the idea that meaningful learning happens when people are closely
engaged with both the content and one another. It works best when you are prepared, when you
bring your ideas and experience to the discussion, and when you interact with our community of
learners. As the course facilitator, I’ll be bringing my experience as an adult educator, my
research on adult learning, my reading of the literature, and my interactions with others who are
engaged in this work.
1. Be an active member of the learning community by engaging with the content, your
peers, and the instructor frequently. I suggest you log into the Canvas site daily.
2. Complete course readings. As a graduate level course, readings function as the primary
source of content. I assume that you complete the readings carefully and pose questions
that arise to the instructor and/or your peers. I will not lecture on material already
provided in the readings; my philosophy is that class activities should extend the
content, not repeat it, through synthesis, application, and evaluation.
3. Learn as a graduate student by extending, applying, and synthesizing what you read.
The aim is for you to interact with the content by challenging its assumptions and your
own.
4. Be open to the online learning environment by being responsive to learning in new
ways. This may be your first online, asynchronous course. At first, this may present a
myriad of challenges; work to view these as learning opportunities. It also offers the
flexibility to undertake your learning when and where you desire. Many of you will be
called to design or facilitate online learning. Use this as an experience you may draw
from.
5. Read the syllabus carefully
6. Expect to spend 8-12 hours per week, on average, on this course
Overview of Assignments
This course uses the following teaching and learning strategies: readings, discussions, and
presentations. This course has been designed in this manner so that I can model how to engage
adult learners using technology. My intent is to give you experiences that you might use in your
own practice as an adult educator
Page 4
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Formatting requirements
Format your assignments using APA Publication Manual (6th edition).
Submitting an assignment
All your assignments must be submitted to me using Canvas on the given date and time.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Learning Percentage
Assignment Points Due Dates
Outcome of Grade
1) Participation: Discussion 1, 2, 3, 4 25% 250 Weekly;
and self reflection 1st reflection: 10/8;
A.) 1st reflection Final reflection:
B.) Final reflection 12/1
2) Learning team project GLO 2, 20% 200 2A: 10/8
groups PLO 2 2B:12/1
Page 5
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Learning Percentage
Assignment Points Due Dates
Outcome of Grade
A. Grading Scale
Page 6
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Assignment 1: Participation and discussion- Weekly ongoing; 1A) First self-assessment, 1B)
Final self-assessment
Each week there will be a series of asynchronous discussion tasks for you to complete. There
will generally be 1-2 tasks per week. The purpose of these discussions is twofold:
To engage deeply with the content from the readings
To build a community of learners engaged in deepening their understanding of a given
topic
While I strongly believe in the power of discussion as a learning tool, it is challenging to make
the experience authentic and meaningful, while also assessing and policing your participation. In
an effort to change the dynamic from forced participation to authentic discussion, there will be
no specific posting dates or word minimums and you will be responsible for assessing your own
participation in the discussion forum. However, please note that your participation in the
discussion forums and your self-assessment of your participation is worth 250 points, or 25% of
your total grade, so it is not optional. The expectation is that you participate in each weekly
discussion multiple times per week.
In order to give you some early feedback on your participation in the discussion, you will
self assess against the rubric after Module 3 (1A). I'll review your self-assessment and your
posts and let you know if I concur. If you aren't meeting expectations, you'll know early in the
course and be able to adjust.
Your final self-assessment (1B) will be submitted at the end of the quarter and should consider
the following criteria in a 1-2 page narrative reflection. You will also submit a completed rubric
(below). You may include examples of your postings in your self-reflection to demonstrate how
you have addressed each criterion.
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 1: Participation
and discussion
1. Frequency and Posts 4-5 times throughout week; to the extent possible, 40
timing postings are distributed from Monday-Sunday
2. Initial posting Initial post is well developed and responds to all 40
elements of prompt, shows depth of conceptual
understanding
3. Follow up postings Follow up postings demonstrates analysis of others’ 40
contributions and engages in meaningful discussion by
building on previous posts
4. Content Posts are factually accurate and exhibit self reflection 40
contribution and critical thinking
Page 7
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Page 8
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Schedule Required Zoom Meeting: Purpose of this meeting is to get to know one another
and share your project topic; ideally this should be scheduled during the second week of the
course.
Leadership: Each task should have a rotating leader
Calendar: By what date will you share drafts of assignments? By what date will you post
your feedback?
Norms:
o How will your team communicate?
o How often will your team communicate?
o How much time will you spend reviewing drafts?
o Depending on the number of teammates, how will you offer feedback? E.g., Will you
pair up? Rotate pairs? Give each team member feedback?
o How will you share feedback (E.g., comments on a doc, narrative, using the rubric?)
o What will you do if a team member is unresponsive?
o How will you handle conflicts if they arise?
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Page 9
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Grading elements for Assignment Excellent work would look like… Points possible
2B:case study project team reflection
Page 10
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Page 11
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
The purpose of the Learning life history paper is to encourage you to reflect on important past
learning experiences in order to:
identify past learning experiences that are meaningful to you in light of your present
practice or career
recognize the multiple experiences that contribute to your sense of self as an adult learner
identify the themes and questions from your practice that you are interested in addressing
in your graduate school experience
re-organize and re-interpret your past through writing and representation.
There is no right way to write or represent your learning life history. You should think about
your narrative as a reinterpretation of the life experiences that helps you to make meaning of
your decision to pursue a master’s degree at this moment in your life and career. This paper will
be a personal document that can include insight, reflections and feelings. The structure of the
narrative depends on you. You can follow chorological logic or present critical events in your
life or use specific themes or questions to organize your narrative. You might consider the
environment where you were born and grew up, family and childhood experiences, experiences
with formal education, the influence of significant people in your life, first job experiences, early
and/or significant career experiences.
You won’t be expected to share this document with your peers. I’ll read it, but I won’t critique
it. If you complete the assignment you will receive full credit. I hope that writing your learning
life history will be an enjoyable experience. This is not an academic paper, but rather a personal
expression of what you wish to write and learn.
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 3: Learning life
history
1. Elements Writing, organization and framing demonstrates deep 50 points
consideration of your learning life history (Credit/No-
credit)
TOTAL 50
Page 12
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
The case study project will be an application of learning theory to a specific adult learning situation.
You are to choose the case, which can be an individual, class or population. You are strongly
encouraged to choose a case that reflects your professional goals or experience. Examples of appropriate
cases would include: “Somali immigrant women participating in AIDS education programs” , “Michael,
a 42 year old enrolled in an adult literacy program” “First year elementary music teachers
participating in mentoring programs”, “Ella, a displaced forestry worker enrolled in technology
training classes”, “Masters level counseling interns”. If I were completing this project, my case would
be “Masters students in the Adult Education and Training program at Seattle University” because that
is the population with whom I do the majority of my work.
Although the assignment is to complete a single cohesive case study, it will be turned in and graded in
sections. Each section will be given feedback from either the instructor or your case study project team..
Theories should be presented in an integrated and cohesive manner. The project should reflect reading
beyond the assigned course textbook, including original sources for the theories and current research
regarding the population, context and specific learning issues. You will compile each section into a
single cohesive case study, due at the end of the quarter.
Apply each theory to your population; what does the theory suggest about your
population?
What are some implications for your practice as you work with this population?
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 4B:
Developmental theories
Analysis Each theory is explained succinctly but with 60
enough detail that a novice could understand
Justification provided for why theory is
applicable to population
Each theory is applied to population to
derive insight
Implications for your work with this
population provided
Sources Peer reviewed articles and book chapters used to 30
refer to original source for theories, current research,
and context specific information. Research should
go beyond textbook and other assigned readings.
(Expectation is at least 3 references per section)
Overall Format matches expectations with respect to style, 10
length, and layout. Document uses APA formatting
TOTAL 100
Page 14
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 4C: Learning
theories
1. Analysis Each theory is explained succinctly but with 60
enough detail that a novice could understand
Justification provided for why theory is
applicable to population
Each theory is applied to population to
derive insight
Implications for your work with this
population provided
2. Sources Peer reviewed articles and book chapters used to 30
refer to original source for theories, current research,
and context specific information. Research should
go beyond textbook and other assigned readings.
(Expectation is at least 3 references per section)
3. Overall Format matches expectations with respect to style, 10
length, and layout. Document uses APA formatting
TOTAL 100
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 4D: Learning
setting and barriers
1. Analysis Setting is described succinctly but with 60
enough detail for an outsider to understand
its relevant features
Larger system in which setting sits
described
Relevant factors that impact learning setting
Page 15
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
described
At least three barriers to learning described
Research supported solutions to barriers
provided
2. Sources Peer reviewed articles and book chapters used to 30
refer to original source for theories, current research,
and context specific information. Research should
go beyond textbook and other assigned readings.
(Expectation is at least 3 references per section)
3. Overall Format matches expectations with respect to style, 10
length, and layout. Document uses APA formatting
TOTAL 100
Assignment 4E: Current issue/trends application (submit as part of Part F- Integrated case
study)
Choose at least two current issues/trends (possible issues include culture, technology,
globalization, power) in adult learning that are applicable to your population;
Describe how each issue issue/trend impacts your population
Offer solutions for how you might refine your work with this population to address each
issue/trend
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 4E: Current
issue/trends application
1. Analysis Two current issues/trends described 60
Justification provided for why issue/trend is
applicable to population
Each issue/trend is applied to population to
derive insight
Research supported solutions provided
2. Sources Peer reviewed articles and book chapters used to 30
refer to original source for theories, current research,
and context specific information. Research should
go beyond textbook and other assigned readings.
(Expectation is at least 3 references per section)
3. Overall Format matches expectations with respect to style, 10
length, and layout. Document uses APA formatting
TOTAL 100
Page 16
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Revise and compile Assignment 4 Parts B-E into a single cohesive case study for Assignment
4F: Integrated case study.
Grading elements for Excellent work would look like… Points possible
Assignment 4F: Integrated
case study
Elements Introduction and conclusion included 30
Each section addressed (4b-4e)
Content of each section conveys necessary
information
Integration Document edited to read as coherent case study rather 30
than series of separate assignments. Transitions used
between sections; heading and subheading used
effectively
Sources Peer reviewed articles and book chapters used to refer 20
to original source for theories, current research, and
content specific information. Research should go
beyond textbook and other assigned readings.
(Expectation is at least 15 references- although 25 or
more is likely)
Overall Format matches expectations with respect to style, 20
length, and layout. Document uses APA formatting
TOTAL 100
Page 17
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
C. Course Expectations
Participate regularly in Canvas by engaging in online activities throughout the week, not
just on the day the assignment is due. Since this course does not have 3 hour in person
sessions, I expect that you spend that time engaging on canvas. This is in addition to the
time you spend reading materials or completing assignments.
Complete readings. Online posting should demonstrate that you have read and reflected
on the topic being discussed.
Communicate with peers in a timely and respectful manner especially when engaging in
paired or grouped assignments.
Page 18
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
**Please note: Readings should be completed by the first day of the module they are listed in.
There are no readings for Module 1 so that you can complete readings expected for Module 2.
Page 19
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Assignments
10/15 Assignment 4b: Developmental theories due
Module 5: Transformative learning
(10/16-10/22)
Readings
Merriam & Bierema (2014): Ch 5
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on
a theory in progress, 3-33.
Cranton, P., & Wright, B. (2008). The transformative educator as learning companion. Journal of
Transformative Education, 6(1), 33-47.
Module 6: Non-traditional perspectives
(10/23-10/29)
Readings
Merriam & Bierema (2014): Ch 7
Tisdell, E. J. (2008). Spirituality and adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing
Education, 2008(119), 27-36.
Brendel, W., & Bennett, C. (2016). Learning to Embody Leadership Through Mindfulness and Somatics
Practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(3), 409-425.
Assignments
10/29 Assignment 4c: Learning theories due
Module 7: Critical perspectives
(10/30-11/5)
Readings
Merriam & Bierema (2014): Ch 11
Kilgore, D. W. (2001). Critical and postmodern perspectives on adult learning. New directions for adult
and continuing education, 2001(89), 53-62.
Module 8: Cognition and neuroscience
(11/6-11/12)
Readings
Merriam & Bierema (2014): Ch 9
Cozolino, L., & Sprokay, S. (2006). Neuroscience and adult learning. New Directions for Adult and
Continuing Education, 2006(110), 11-19.
Taylor, K. (2006). Brain function and adult learning: Implications for practice. New Directions for Adult
and Continuing Education, 2006(110), 71-85.
Assignments
11/12 Assignment 4d: Learning setting and barriers due
Module 9: Culture and context: Implications for practice
(11/13-11/19)
Readings
Merriam & Bierema (2014): Ch 10
Lange, E., & Baillie Abidi, C. (2015). Rethinking Social Justice and Adult Education for Welcoming,
Inclusive Communities: Synthesis of Themes. New Directions For Adult & Continuing Education,
2015(146), 99-109. doi:10.1002/ace.20135
Kasl, E., & Yorks, L. (2016). Do I really know you? Do you really know me? Empathy amid diversity in
differing learning contexts. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 3-20. (Links to an external site.)Links to an
external site.
THANKSGIVING WEEK- NO MODULE (11/20-11/26)
Page 20
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
The university makes every effort to notify students of course cancellations due to weather or
unexpected events that result in campus closure. Notify your instructor if you live in a Greater
Seattle region experiencing an unexpected event preventing you from travel. If your instructor is
more than 15 minutes late with no notice or communication via e-mail or CANVAS, please
contact the Department Chair for your program. Additional Course Specific Information:
ACADEMIC RESOURCES
Lemieux Library and McGoldrick Learning Commons (including such resources as:
Learning Assistance Programs, Research [Library] Services, Writing Center, Math Lab) can be
accessed at the following url: http://www.seattleu.edu/learningcommons
If you have, or think you may have, a disability (including an ‘invisible disability’ such as a
learning disability, a chronic health problem, or a mental health condition) that interferes with
your performance as a student in this class, you are encouraged to discuss your needs and
arrange support services and/or accommodations through Disabilities Services staff in the
Learning Center, Loyola 100, (206) 296-5740.
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Page 21
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
The Academic Integrity policy and procedures (academic honesty) of the university define what
the university considers academic dishonesty, what penalties can be imposed for violations of
academic integrity, and the appeal process if a student is found to have violated academic
integrity.
The Academic Integrity policy and procedures can be downloaded at the following URL:
https://www.seattleu.edu/redhawk-axis/academic-policies/
This grade grievance policy and procedure defines the policies and outlines the processes that
govern in those cases when a student wishes to challenge a final course grade.
The academic grading grievance policy and procedure document can downloaded using the
following URL: https://www.seattleu.edu/redhawk-axis/policies/
RELIGIOUS OBLIGATIONS
The Seattle University Provost has requested that faculty extend courtesy to students with
religious obligations and special circumstances. Students are encouraged to discuss any planned
absences prior to the start of the quarter in order to have an understanding of the instructor’s
expectations. Faculty and students may contact the SU Multifaith Campus Minister in Campus
Ministry at 206.296.6049 for assistance.
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
The purpose of this policy is to define the appeal policies and processes related to the following
professional program decisions that are related to professional conduct/behavior/dispositions:
retaining or graduating a student; permitting a student to enter or continue in a practicum, an
Page 22
EDUC 5130 Summer 2017 College of Education
Robbins Seattle University
Page 23