Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Testimony of
Loren Ganoe
Chief of Staff
PUBLIC HEARING
BILL 18-579,
PREVENTION OF CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT
AMENDMENT ACT OF 2009
October 6, 2010
Ganoe, chief of staff for the District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency. I am
pleased to testify today on Bill 18-579, the "Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Amendment
Act of 2009.”
Congress enacted the “Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008”
to promote permanence and improve outcomes for children in the child welfare system. All child
welfare agencies across the nation must comply with provisions of this legislation. But long
before passage of “Fostering Connections”, the District already had some child welfare supports
that the legislation now seeks to nationalize. Among those are: serving children until age 21,
having subsidized legal guardianship as a pathway to permanence, and paying relatives the same
subsidies foster parents receive to take children into their homes. Thus, District practice was
already ahead of many of the provisions of “Fostering Connections”—or we were able to come
into compliance by simply amending existing policies and procedures. However, local legislative
action is necessary in order for District child welfare to implement mandatory provisions of
“Fostering Connections” related to (1) educational stability and (2) determining the
appropriateness of the permanency goal of guardianship. Proposed Bill 18-579 covers these
Educational Stability
“Fostering Connections” requires child welfare agencies to spell out in case plans the steps
undertaken to ensure educational stability for children in foster care. In making placement
decisions, child welfare agencies must consider the proximity of the child’s current school and
1
appropriateness of that school to meet the child’s needs. Whenever possible, child welfare
agencies must take steps to ensure foster children stay in their current school—or the agency
must quickly re-enroll them in a new school. Bill 18-579 ensures reflection of these federal
Local compliance will not be an issue because CFSA is already taking steps to ensure
educational stability for children and youth in foster care. Here are the highlights.
CFSA and private-provider staff about determining whether children and youth should
remain in their school of origin when entering foster care or changing placements.
Placement Decision Guide to assist social workers in determining the best educational
interests of the child. It includes factors such as personal safety of the student, continuity
School of origin and the subsequent decision about where the child should attend school
are routine topics at the Family Team Meetings. Parents, extended family members,
guardians ad litem, social workers, and other family supporters and professionals are all
We also continue to work closely with the DC Public Schools and Office of the State
Superintendent for Education to improve data sharing about and supports for children and youth
2
Determining Appropriateness of Relative Guardianship
For children whose permanency goal is guardianship with a relative, “Fostering Connections”
requires child welfare agencies to address the appropriateness of the guardianship arrangement.
The child’s case plan must state reasons why the child welfare agency could not achieve the
permanency goals of reunification or adoption and why a kinship guardian arrangement is in the
child’s best interest. Child welfare agencies must also document the reasons for any separation of
siblings during the placement. CFSA has promulgated an Administrative Issuance that provides
guidance to staff on these new requirements and made the necessary changes to our automated
Conclusion
legislation proposed in Bill 18-579 will codify a series of requirements that District child welfare
already strives to meet in practice. It will not only ensure that the District is in compliance with
mandatory provisions of the federal “Fostering Connections” legislation but will also improve
outcomes for the city’s most vulnerable children and youth. It will help children in foster care
continue their education with as little disruption as possible and ensure that a kinship
guardianship arrangement is in the best interest of the child. I respectfully urge the Council to