Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Through solutions of appropriate forms of the Navier-Stokes equation, the intermixing of fluid
within gas-stirred ladles, with asymmetric single and multiporous plugs, can be modeled quite
satisfactorily. In this study, mixing behavior and mixing mechanisms are analyzed as a function
of porous plug location, tracer injection point, and ladle monitoring point. It is shown that off-
centered bubbling gives the most consistent results in terms of minimizing mixing times, since
angular momentum intermixes fluid across the width of a ladle. Comparisons between mathe-
matical and experimental data are presented.
(9 (9 1 (9 pv
+ ---
rO0
[f(0;0 )] + 2v
+~o +
~z (puv ) + -r --(gr( rpvv ) + -r --(90(pwv ) - --(gz tx~ff 2 2
where [lO]
+ --- O lO 10
r/~eff --Oz(pue, ) + -r --Or( rpve, ) + -r -~O (pwe, )
r (90
[6]
0 (i,x_..~O~zz) _ ___10 (I.X_.~r O-~r)
Oz r Or
i~ ~ METER
',Of
CHART 80 O=
10 l/mit
ELECTRODE - ,~ RECORDER
/
POROUS 70
PLUG
0 center
II 1/3R
80 9 1/2R E
9 2/3R
70
4(
A
~J 6 0
~ so 30
40
30 20
20
J
10 2~0 .. 3I0 4 0=
0.0 0.5 1.0
Q (liter~lmin.) r/R
Fig. 2 - - Variation in 95 pct m i x i n g t i m e s with gas flow rate for p l u g s Fig. 3 - - A plot o f m i x i n g t i m e vs radial position for a single p l u g for
p l a c e d at center, one-third, half, and two-thirds radius o f ladle base. various flow rates.
A. Flow Patterns
O 8=nM
A 0 = n/2
8c
70
6O
E 50
+,i"
40
rs j
30
20
lb 2b 3b 4b
Q (literslmin.)
Fig. 4 - - V a r i a t i o n in 95 pct mixing times with gas flow rate for double- Fig. 6 - - ( a ) through (d) Computations illustrating flow patterns de-
plug arrangements, placed at midradius. The effect of the angle, 0, veloped by submerged gas injection through a single porous plug lo-
subtended between the two plugs, is illustrated. cated at center, one-third, half, and two-thirds radius, respectively.
;,:...--//tit NU|i;;:
at 45 deg to the plume (b), and at right angles to the B. Mixing Procedures
plume (c), have been provided. Similarly, horizontal
Using the numerical procedures already outlined, the
components of the fluid flow across the surface (d), at
combined effects of tracer addition point and bubbler lo-
midlevel (e), and along the bottom of the ladle (f), are
cation on mixing times were studied mathematically.
presented. The average recirculating flow speed was pre-
Figure 10(a) shows the four different locations chosen
dicted to be 0.1 m/s.
for tracer input with respect to the plume's eye for single-
The key features to note are the angular velocities which
plug bubbling. Figure 10(b) gives three different loca-
significantly affect tracer dispersion rates (as discussed
tions of tracer input chosen for twin-plug bubbling.
in Section IV-B). It can be seen that as the plug's po-
Thus, Figure 11 provides mixing times predicted for
sition is moved off center, the angular momentum of fluid
tracer input to a 1/3-scale water model of a 100-tonne
motion increases remarkably. Predicted mean speeds
ladle with single-plug bubbling. The marked squares
within the ladle vs change in porous plug location are
represent the experimentally measured mixing times for
presented in Table II. It can be seen that the mean an-
comparison with mathematical predictions. As seen, when
gular velocity increases and the mean axial and radial
the tracer was added exactly into the eye of the plume
velocities decrease as the plug is moved away from the
(case A), center gas bubbling proved to have the shortest
center.
bulk mixing time. This was followed by increases as the
Flow patterns for twin-plug injection are provided in
bubbler position approached the ladle sidewall. How-
Figure 8. There, diametrically opposed porous plugs were
ever, since the flow characteristics of real plumes in the
placed at one-third, half, and two-thirds radii, respec-
tively. Two-dimensional plots for selected planes are il-
lustrated in Figure 9 for plugs at half radius location and Table II. Predicted Mean Speeds of Axial,
diametrically opposed to each other. The mean speed for Radial, and Angular Directions in a 1/3 Scale
recirculating flow was predicted to be 0.09 m / s for such Water Model of a 100-Tonne Ladle for Various
cases, this being 10 pct less than that for single plug Plug Positions (Q = 30 NI/min, unit = m/s)
bubbling with the equivalent gas flow rate. The mean
speed in axial (u), radial (v), and angular (w) directions 1.1 Ivl Iwl Iu cl
was predicted to be 0.068, 0.020, and 0.028 m / s , re- Center 0.1094 0.0464 0.0000 0.1391
spectively. It can again be seen that the angular mo- 1/3 R 0.0687 0.0346 0.0311 0.1008
mentum of fluid motion increases as the plug's position 1/2 R 0.0658 0.0368 0.0421 0.1025
2/3 R 0.0529 0.0355 0.0533 0.1028
is moved off center.
Oo;/
\~
/~ c
(
q
~
oo
~q
oo
s,
c
-~ = 0 . 2 m/sea
0
.,0~r
n .......................
~kkkk~"
~' ..........
. . . .
"~r
"'~gddilifl
t
the consequence of missing the "bull's eye" (or center
of the up-welling plume) leads to tremendous increases
O0
I
0.5 1.0
in mixing times.
P e r contra, as the plug is moved away from the center
toward the sidewall, solute transport by angular mo-
r/R mentum increases, yielding faster mixing even though
the tracer is injected at the sidewall. Figures 13(a) and
Fig, l 1--Illustration of predicted 95 pct bulk mixing times in a
1/3-scale water model of a 100-tonne ladle for various plug positions
(b) illustrate the transient mixing processes for a plug
and tracer addition points. (Square marks represent measured mixing placed at half radius, when tracer was injected into the
times.) center plume (case A) and into liquid at the sidewall
(case C), respectively. As seen, for the center-plume ad-
dition, tracer is dispersed rapidly, reaching 95 pct bulk
95 pct mixing times for center bubbling proved to be the mixing at the left side and bottom of plume after
longest and decreased significantly as the plug was moved 24 seconds and then at the upper right sidewall to plume
toward the sidewall. Asai et al.,[l~ using physical models, after 30 seconds. The 95 pct bulk mixing time was pre-
studied mixing behavior under the conditions of case C. dicted to be 38 seconds for such a case. Dispersion char-
As discussed in previous research work, ttaj mixing of acteristics for the sidewall additions were seen to be similar
A tracer
120 10541.05 1.20 0.95 0.95
-7...... .- ~
A
bubbling
B tracer
0.50
bubblinq
(a) 20 seconds (b) 60 seconds (c) 110 seconds
Fig. 12--Illustration of transients in isoconcentrations following center-plume addition of a tracer (A), and tracer addition just off-center to the
gas/liquid plume (B), during center gas bubbling.
1.05 ~ ~,
20~ 0.8CC ~,~f" / 0.95
"~b.95 -- -v '~../I
bubbling
(a) 10 seconds (b) 20 seconds (c) 30 seconds
I
tracer
_ _ -~-3~:._z.Z22- i.Gg--
1 O5
bubbling
but to take much longer (55 seconds) for complete 95 pct bulent viscosity as computed for off-center single-plug
bulk mixing. bubbling at half radius and for dual-plug bubbling dia-
In summary, since center gas bubbling has no angular metrically opposed bubblers at half radius. As seen, for
momentum, mixing is dominated by eddy diffusion, re- the dual-plug bubbling, the average turbulent viscosity
suiting in delayed mixing times for off-center plume ad- in the center vertical plane of the bubblers was in-
ditions. As the plug is moved away from the center toward creased. Furthermore, its predicted distributions were
the sidewall, momenta in the three polar directions be- relatively homogeneous across the ladle by comparison
come comparable. Owing to concurrent increases in an- with that for single-plug bubbling. In contrast, as already
gular momentum, mixing times become relatively noted, the predicted mean speed (of recirculation) was
insensitive to the tracer addition point. This can be in- reduced to 90 pct of that for single-plug bubbling at
terpreted for the industrial steelmaking ladle process such 40 L/min. This is consistent with the concept that greater
that off-center gas stirring is relatively insensitive to the shearing actions are generated in twin, or multiplug,
location of thermal and chemical segregation in ladle. bubbling vs single-plug bubbling, such that diffusive
Figures 14(a) through (c) illustrate tracer dispersion components are raised at the expense of convective com-
behavior for twinly opposed porous plugs, at half radii ponents of the intermixing process.
for a center-ladle addition (case E), a plume addition
(case F), and a sidewall addition (case G), respectively. C. Plume Distortion and Wall Effects
Mixing times were predicted to be 38 seconds for
case E, 58 seconds for case F, and 70 seconds for The results of the computations just described provide
case G. It is interesting to note that for the center-ladle a convincing argument for mixing times becoming shorter
addition, 95 pct bulk mixing levels are first reached in as the plug is moved away from the ladle's center. How-
the two plume zones, expanding the mixing area to each ever, since slippage and wall friction effects were not
sidewall, while for cases F and G, it is first reached at taken into account in the present computational model
the center of the vessel. It can be seen from Figures 12 for plugs located near the sidewall, the experimental ob-
through 14 that the last mixing point is dependent on the servation that mixing at two-thirds radius was again
tracer injection point and plug locations. somewhat delayed could not be properly predicted.
Figures 15(a) and (b) illustrate the distributions of tur- Figure 16 illustrates pictorially the characteristics of a
_L _ 1.05 1.05
0.95
bubbling bubbling
(a) 10seconds (b) 20 seconds (c) 30 seconds
h.hhling bubbling
(a) 10 seconds (b) 20 seconds (c) 45 seconds
L
C tracer
bubbling bubbling
(a) 20 seconds (b) 40 seconds (c) 60 seconds
Fig. 14--=Illustration of transients in isoconcentrations following center-tank addition (A), a plume addition (B), and a sidewall addition (C), of
a tracer for double porous plug gas bubbling diametrically placed at half radii.
single plume rising through water, for plugs set at the procedure by Boysan and Johansen t8} can predict those
ladle's center, one-third, half, and two-thirds radii, re- conditions for which the plume is "bent" inward, or out-
spectively. One should note that the flow field can dis- ward, as a result of interactions with the bulk flow fields.
tort the plume from a vertical trajectory, the degree to There, a flow field is first deduced using the Eulerian
which the plume is "bent" being a function of crossflows scheme. Successive bubbles are then introduced into the
within the ladle. system, using a Lagrangian framework. This allows spa-
For a plug located at two-thirds radius, its associated tial variations in plume voidage to be computed as a
plume is distorted toward the sidewall, resulting in con- function of bulk flow patterns. Through successive it-
tact of the plume with the sidewall. This might cause a erations between Eulerian and Lagrangian frames of ref-
part of the buoyancy force of the bubbles to be lost by erence, therefore, plume geometries can be deduced as
slippage, together with an increase in drag force (shear part of the numerical solution procedures.
stress) up the sidewall. Furthermore, the large shear stress Figure 17 shows plume interactions for two plug ar-
on the wall will increase the potential for hydrodynamic rangements. As seen, when two plugs are closely placed,
erosion of the ladle's refractories. However, plume dis- the plumes coalesce, diminishing the effect of double
tortions were not observed with weak gas bubbling (i.e., gas bubbling. Similarly, when two plugs are located near
<10 L/rain in this water model system). the sidewalls, this will increase wall shear stresses and
An alternative, but more computationally demanding, the potential of hydrodynamic erosion of the refractories.
ILl\)\ i ! 4.0
'
, I
I/\ % \ JV /I
0.08._., I .- - ~ ~ o.I- ;:~' o.s ,: r -o-z
It is therefore concluded that the placement of porous to steel reoxidation by entrained slag droplets and oxy-
plugs at half radius is an optimum location. There, the gen and nitrogen pickup from the free metal surface ex-
portion of momentum in each direction is of the same posed to the atmosphere in the "plume's eye."
order, and wall effects are minimized. Kim et al. tl31 proposed an empirical expression for
predicting the critical gas flow rate through a plug that
D. Industrial Applications causes liquid slag to start to be entrained into an under-
lying steel bath. It is given by (cgs units)
Proper stirring of the liquid steel is very important
during steelmaking processes. For instance, there are Qcr = 6.7 •
10_2H1.8, ( o ' A o ' ~ ~
\--ZI [18]
metallurgical reactions which require strong mixing of
metal and slag. Stirring for decarburization, desulfuriza-
tion, and dephosphorization belongs to this case. On the where Qcr (cm3/s) represents the critical flow rate, H
other hand, stirring for deoxidation, alloy homogeniza- (cm) the height of ladle, o" (dyne/cm) the interracial sur-
tion, or inclusion removal requires gentle mixing at the face tension, Ap (gr/cm 3) the density difference between
metal/slag interface and maintenance of an unbroken slag slag and metal, and Ps the slag density.
layer. The critical flow rate for slag/metal mixing expressed
For gas stirring in the teeming ladle, the need for gentle by Eq. [18] could be used as a criterion for the deter-
mixing can be intensified due to improper control of slag mination of gentle stirring. The analysis indicates the flow
carryover. The presence of a liquid slag layer on the metal rate should be quite low, typically 100 to 150 L/min for
surface can cause significant delay in mixing times, since a 150-tonne ladle, t23JThe critical flow rate for slag/metal
the breakage and deformation of the slag layer consume mixing is mainly related to slag layer breakup and slag
part of the stirring input energy. Moreover, strong tur- droplet entrainment caused by strong upward momentum
bulent flows at the slag/metal interface activate inter- of the plume. Therefore, if high flow rates with gentle
facial mass transfer and slag droplet entrainment, leading but fast mixing are needed, multiplug gas bubbling could
Greek Symbols
V. CONCLUSIONS
a volume fraction of gas in the gas/liquid
Mixing phenomena in steelmaking ladles have been plume
studied using mathematical and aqueous physical models E dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy
for a one-third scale of a 100-tonne ladle. It was con- Fe,C effective diffusivity of tracer
cluded that: 0 partial differential term
1. Flow patterns are strongly dependent on the number 0 circumferential coordinate
and positions of the bubblers. As the bubblers are laminar viscosity
moved off-center, angular momenta increase, reduc- /Zeff effective turbulent viscosity
ing mixing times significantly. /xt turbulent viscosity
2. Measured mixing times are sensitive to monitoring P density of fluid (water/molten steel)
point as well as to bubbler location. Ap density difference between metal and slag
3. When a porous plug bubbler is close to a ladle side- Pc density of gas
wall, flows will distort the plume toward that side- PL density of liquid
wall, increasing drag force on the wall. This increases Ps density of slag
the mixing time needed f0r alloy homogenization and o- laminar Schmidt number in Eq. [14] (v/D or
increases the potential for hydrodynamic erosion of tx/pD), where D = diffusivity interfacial
the ladle's refractories. tension in Eq. [18]
4. For double porous plug bubbling, more gentle flow ort turbulent Schmidt number (tx,/pD,)
and equivalent mixing times vs single off-center bub-
bling were predicted, using equal net flows of gas
into the ladle. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
5. A midradius placement of a porous plug represents
an optimum location for single-plug bubbling, while The authors deeply appreciate the support of NSERC
diametrically opposed, midradius placement of bub- and the Korean Ministry of Education for providing
blers is recommended for double-plug bubbling. research support funds for S. Joo.
6. The last point within the bulk of the liquid to become
mixed depends on the tracer addition point and plug
arrangements. REFERENCES
1. J. Szekely, H.J. Wang, and K.M. Kiser: Metall. Trans. B, 1976,
vol. 7B, pp. 287-95.
2. T. DebRoy and A.K. Majumdar: J. Met., 1981, November,
LIST OF SYMBOLS pp. 42-47.
3. J.H. Grevet, J. Szekely, and N. EI-Kaddah: Int. J. Heat Mass
C mass fraction of inclusions/tracer Transfer, 1982, vol. 25 (4), pp. 487-97.
Cl, C2, empirical turbulent constants (see Table I) 4. Y. Sahai and R.I.L. Guthrie: Metall. Trans. B, 1982, vol. 13B,
C~, Co pp. 193-202.
G generation term of turbulence kinetic energy 5. Y. Sahai and R.I.L. Guthrie: Metall. Trans. B, 1982, vol. 13B,
(Eq. [10]) pp. 203-11.
6. M. Salcudean, C.H. Low, A. Hurda, and R.I.L. Guthrie: Chem.
g gravity acceleration constant Eng. Comm., 1982, vol. 21, pp. 89-103.
K an empirical constant for determining mean 7. M. Salcudean, K.Y.M. Lye, and R.I.L. Guthrie: Can. J. Chem.
plume velocity (Eq. [16]) Eng., 1985, vol. 63, pp. 51-61.
k turbulent kinetic energy 8. F. Boysan and S.T. Johansen: Proc. Int. Seminar on Refining
and Alloying of Liquid Aluminium and Ferroalloys, T.A. Engh,
L height of ladle S. Lyng, and H.A. Oye, eds., Aluminum-Verlag, Dusseldorf,
P pressure (gage, referenced to a local point Germany, 1985, pp. 267-88.
within liquid) 9. K. Nakanishi, T. Fujii, and J. Szekely: lronmaking and
Q volumetric flow rate of gas from porous Steelmaking, 1975, no. 3, pp. 193-97.
10. S. Asai, T. Okamoto, J.C. He, and I. Muchi: Trans. Iron Steel
plug, referenced to mean height and Inst. Jpn., 1983, vol. 23, pp. 43-50.
temperature of liquid 11. M. Sano and K. Mori: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1983, vol. 23,
R ladle radius pp. 169-75.
r radial coordinate 12. O. Haida, T. Emi, S. Yamada, and F. Sudo: ScaninjectH, MEFOS
rav ,p average plume radius and Jernkontoret, June 1980, Lulea, Sweden, Paper No. 20.
13. S. Kim, R.J. Frnehan, and R.I.L. Guthrie: Steelmaking Proc.,
S "source terms" for computational fluid ISS-AIME, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987, pp. 107-18.
dynamics finite difference equations 14. D. Mazumdar: Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mining and
time Metallurgical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, PQ,
time-averaged axial/vertical component of Canada, 1985.
15. C.J. Dobson and M. Robertson: Model Studies of Gas Stirred
velocity Ladles, Internal Report, BHP Steel, Australia, 1986.
mean plume velocity 16. T. Marujama, N. Kamishima, and T. Mizushina: J. Chem. Eng.
v time-averaged radial component of velocity Jpn., 1984, vol. 17 (2), pp. 120-26.