Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Mize Exhibit 1 - Soil Testing Results

    Încărcat de

    Kyle Whitmire
    34K vizualizări12 pagini
    Mize Exhibit 1 - Soil Testing Results

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    Mize Exhibit 1 - Soil Testing Results

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    34K vizualizări12 pagini

    Mize Exhibit 1 - Soil Testing Results

    Încărcat de

    Kyle Whitmire
    Mize Exhibit 1 - Soil Testing Results

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 12
    Sutherland Environmental Company, Inc. 2515 Sth Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35233, dossttos00| (Cenk Goodwyn, Ws & Casood Rap Bae pane TOT Jtcotion: Ms. yaya Redmond Reference # 28370 Adireos 4699 Hafinan Re row verbal Grady, AL 36036 Projet Coleeville i Reape Mani sol Tasion Dae aS Duenecened 49/13 Anal Hageman'Cureoce Dee Cellesed: 4/13 Dateot Anahi 4/113 Sample Collecior. J. Redmon. Dallon_Method EPA Method 82700 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS, HELD 1D | FIELD 1D [FELD 1O[ FIELD 1D] FIELD 1D Tiel | ie | Ties | nea | TBs Polynuclear LAB ID | LAB | LAB ID | LAB ID | LABID Deieton laromaties. ppm __| 142667 | 1azeon | 142660_| ta2670_|_1a267 init pp Penaphine sme ee oe] enaphiytone a a 1050 tirascne a 80 enatjentvasene | — ou [apt —| — oo [not [a O80 Berza(poorstrs | — poe aot | so. ont] 0. 80 Benza(vorantens—[ sou —[ ant —[ wont] — oc 80 Beaza(gijpyiene—[ — anc [wor] — ox | wo —[ noe as enoolaiyrene a 050 loser a 80 La aa a VV nD Fiorniboe SoC aoe a] ao 8D rene eo 050 Tene 220peeae | — vow [wot | oo | ncn RD [Napatene soe | ooo] 30 Phenaniens a 8D ene ea 50 BDL Below Detection Limit Respect submited, Detection limit is Practical Quantitation Limit {All results expressed as PPM (akg) Nx: 52 é LON sQAQc Kevin Doriety EPA Laboratory ID ALOLOS4 Analytical Chemist Quatity Environmental Analytical Services Sutherland Environmental Company, Inc. 2515 Sth Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35233, 205-581-9500 [Client Goodwor, Mills & Cawood Report Bate! Apa 12, 2015 JAttention: Ms, Jymalyn Redmond Reference # 28570" QC Address: 4659 Huffman Rd, 2.0.4 verbal Grady, AL 36036, Project ID: Collegeville [OC Matrix: ‘water ‘Analytical IMethod EPA Method 8270C_“Analyst Hageman/Curence POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS TAB ID | Method TABID Polynuclear Contiaued | Detection | Anelysis | Analysis [Standard | % | ‘Target Aromatics, pp __| Calibration] Limit, ppm} Date _| Time | Calibration] Recovery | Range (%) [Acenaphthene 0.00907 [0.001] 4/11/13, 1143) | ‘0.010. ‘91% 70-130 Accnophthylene 0.00936 | 0.001 -anivis |_1143 0.010 | 94% | 70-130, Anthracene 0.01078 [| _0.001 | -4niinis | 1143] 0.010 | 108% | 70-130 IBenzo(a)antiracene | o.oos7a [0.501 | a/iivix | 1143 0.010] 98% | 70.130. iBenzo(byfuoranthene|_0.00815 | o.ooo1 | amins | 1143 | 0.010 [82% | 70-130 fpenzo(kRtuoranthene | 0.00882 [0.0001 | 4nii7i3_|_1143_| 0.010 [88% [70-130 Benzo(ghipperytene | 0.0on3s | 0.0005 | ais |_1143_[ 0.010 [84% | 70-130. Benzola)pyrene 0.00863 ~o.oo01 | a”n17i3_{ 1143 | 0.010 | 86% [70.130 Cisne Tapp} oma | rs [non] oe [ros Dibenzo(atjanttracene | 0.00837 | 0.001 [amis [1143] —0.010_[ 84% [70-130 Fuorantene 0.00849~| _o.aor | anniris | 11430010 [85% [70-130 Fiuorene O.oosas | oor antiris | 1143] 0.010] 85% | 70-130 lindeno(I2Scdpyrene | o.oosos | ooot | airs | 1143 [0.010 [81% [70-130 ] [Naphthalene 001 _[-anins_| 1143 _[_0.010 [109% | 70-130 [Phenanthrene e018 {oor | aninis | —1143_| 0.010 | 102% | 70-130. [Pyrene e.00885 | 0.0005 4niis | 1143 J 0.010 [89% [70.130 BDL~ Below Detection Limit All results expressed as PPM (mg/L) NK _ 19Qage ADEM #41470 EPA Laboratory ID ALO1084 Respectfully submited, Levin dnb. Kevin Doriety Analytical Chemist Quality Environmental Analytical Services Sutherland Environmental Company, Inc. 2515 Sth Avenue Sou Birmingham, AL 35233, 205-581-9500 [Glient- ~~ Goodwyn, Mills & Cawood Report Date ‘pal 12, 2013 JAttention: Ms, Jymalyn Redmond Referenco # 28570 JAddress: 4659 Huffinan Rd, P.O.# verbal Grady, AL 36036, Project ID: Collegeville [Sample Mate wil Analyical IDate Received 49n3 Analyst Kevin Doriety Date Collected: 4/93 Date of Analysis: 4/0/13 [Sample Collector: _J. Redmond P. Dalton_ Method: EPA Method 60108 METALLIC ANALYTES [ELD ip [EL Wo [FIELD 1 | FIELD [FIELD ID THea | THe2 [THs | Tub | THH-s Analyte, mg/Kg | LABIw | LABID | LABID | LaBw | LABID Detection as Total 142607 | 142608 | 142609 | 142670 [142671 [Arsenic 27 25 BL. 33, 4 NA~Not Available BDL.= Below Detection Limit Detection Limit is Method Detection Limit All results expressed as PPM mg/Kg of total analyte Mx / aac EPA Laboratory 1D ALOLO84 Respectfully submitted, Kevin Doriety Analytical Chemist Quality Environmental Analytical Services Sutherland Environmental Company, Inc. 2515 Sth Avenue South Birmingham, AL 35233 205-581-9500 (Giient:Goaduyn, Mills & Cawood Report Date Apr 12, 2013 [Attention: Ms. Symalyn Redmond Reference # 28370 QC [Address: 4659 Huffman Re, POF verbal | Grady, AL 36036 Project I: Collegeville | [QC Matrix water ‘Analy [Date Received: 493 “Analyst: Kevin Doriety [Date Collected 49/13 Date Analysis: anon [sample Collector: ___J. Redmond/P. Dalton_ Method: EPA Method 60108 METALLIC ANALYTES TABID ‘LABID ‘Viaonms |Last | capi | cABiD [Analyte, mg/l. Reagent | LABID | spite ae we | c% las Total Blank _[142671MS|_ Recovery % Recovery ci [Arsenic ‘BDL 0.263 ao% | 0.199 0,200 100% IPC ~ Instrument Performance Check NA=Not Available BDL= Below Detection Limit MS = Matrix Spike Deteetion Limit is Method Detection Limit All esults expressed 2s PPM mg/L. of total analyte MK sence EPA Laboratory 1D ALOLOS4 Respectfully submitted, Kevin Dority ‘Analytical Chemist Quality Environmental Analytical Services & ——————— \ 0 100 200 NORTH Scale: 1" = 200" THE FLATS AT COLEBRIDGE FIGURE 1 Bure | Ef cooowen| wits | eawoon Suto | Sng A 355 {altace suit |"GueneTwom con DEECRPTION, PROPOSED BACKGROUND SAMPLNGSITES 34 THE FLATS AT COLEBRIDGE FIGURE Date ogesio| [NORTH Scale: 1" = 200' ED cooowrn niece |eawooo wees bso rorOee oAoXeROO SAMRINGHTES THE FLATS AT COLEBRIDGE FIGURE 3 feateraoo DR —= 4 INORTH Scale: 1" = 200° Ey cooowrn | ries ferwooe 0 Ava Soath Steg mba 505 TulSgeamuas | eheneTwonkcon, ‘Subject: RE: From Tartan City Schools Date: May 17, 2013 a 8:00 AMA ‘To: Shelly Mize mizes@tarrantki2.aue Good morning Dr. Mize. | meant to send this EPA fact sheet with your data, but | was in the field and didn’t have an opportunity to pull it. | am sorry that it is marked up, During the EPA Response Action they. determined chat, az. ppm arsenic was a cleanuy of public healt! four number were low eVen for Jel SS ee Fey nendeethis, Da wees Please let me know if | can be of help in any way. From: Jymalyn Redmond jymayn.tedmond@gmeneniorkcom e ‘Thanks again for your cooperation in this matter, Jymalyn Jymalyn Redmond Environmental Manager Goodwyn, Millsm & Cawood, Inc. Cell - 334-590-7010 Frequently Asked Questions 1 Erequently Asked Question: ‘Number 2 ~ Corrected Versi ‘April 2011 a SEPA Results of Community Environmental Sampling: Collegeville, Harriman Park and Fairmont Neighborhoods, North Birmingham, AL ‘Note: Please refer to BPA’s Fact Sheet (Number 2) for a general overview. TOR.QUESTIONS ‘© Whieve was the 2009 environmental sampling conducted? Tn July 2008, the soil-sampling event was conducted at 76 selected propértics tocated in the communities of Fairmont, Collegeville, and Harriman Pack, Additionally, 4 local North Birmingham schools hed soil testing: the former Carver High School, the former Hindson School, Riggins Alternative School, and the Calloway Head Start School. ‘© What are the chemicals of potential concern for the recent 2009 sampling investigation? ‘The chemicals of potential concem in this investigation were Polycyclic Aromatic ‘Hydrocarbons (PAHs), measured as Benzo(a)pyrene toxicity equivalents (BaP TEQ), and. Arsenic. © What were the averail findings of the 2009 sampling iuvestigation aud 2010 re-sampling, conducted by Walter Coke? Schoo! Properties i‘ EPA determined that BaP TEQ was above soil screening levels at several sampling points at the Opportunity School at Riggins. former (now demolished) Hudson School and now Hudson ‘School, and former Carver High Sehool. EPA determined that arsenic was above the soil screening level at one sampling point at the former Carver High School and in the play area at ‘the Former Hudson School. ‘There was ho exceedance of either chemical at the Calloway Head ‘Start Schoo!. Laboratory results of the sampling investigation atthe four schools were discussed both verbally (in April/May 2010) and in writing with the Birmingham City School District Superintendent and his staff (letter dated October 1, 2010). Coordination with the School District to address the findings is ongoing, ‘The Hudson schoo! property was te-sampled in August 2010 because of the constriction activity that hed taken place there as part of the new Hudson School. Re-sampling indicated that contaminants were present in soils on the side of the seliool and in back of the school at Ievels requiring cleanup. In March 2011, Walter Coke removed impsicted soll from the front of the school and inthe back of the school to a depth of tvo feet. Clean soil was placed in excavation and sod grass ‘was planted over the sil Frequently Asked Questions 2 In April 2011, Walter Coke is removing soils contaminated with PAHs around the Opportunity School at Riggins to a depth of two feet. Over 20,000 sq ft of soil will be removed. Residential Properties ‘The overall findings of sampling of 76 properties (Included 65 residential yards, Public Housing, rights-of-way, a church, drainage ditches, and off-site Walter Coke property) in Collegeville, Harriman Park and Fairmont neighborhoods are as follows: Soil Sampling Re: \BOVE Ser “Arsenic ~ 1 of 70 properties ‘BaP TEQ~24 of 70 properties Note that 191 samples were collected at these 70 properties. For each property, 1-6 ‘composite samples of soil were collected. The number depended upon on the layout of the yards on each property (some houses had no backyard, etc). EPA noted a property was “a1” or “above” ifany sample from the property was at or above the screening level for irsentc or BaP TEO. at are soil screening levels? ‘The investigation compared detected concentrations of the 2 chemicals of potential concern in soil to screening levels. The soil soreening levels are conservative risk-based values developed by EPA that are health-based, ‘The levels used are those that may be associated ‘with a | in 10,000 (1 x10“) increased cancer risk over a lifetime, Based upon the sampling ‘results compared to screening levels, and other factors, EPA will determine whether further investigation or cleanup is warranted. Being above a particular screening level indicates {further evaluation may be necessary, but does not necessarily mean that any further action or cleanup is warranted. © What are soil cleanup levels? fa cleanup level is a concentration of one or more chemicals in which a risk of cancer or non- ‘cancer health effects will be reduced or eliminated once removed. Cleanup levels are based on risk based exposure calculations. EPA has chosen a cleanup level for BaP TEQ at a el of TE-4 or a 1:10,000 chance of developing a rma with a index of for 1E-4to 1E-5 risk range, Using these cleanup levels compared against the 2009 sampling results, EPA identified about 30% (or 23) properties above clesnup levels inthe Collegeville, Harriman Park and Fairmont neighborhoods (previous version stated 3524). ehcisdessiiatd «What are the potential health effects of the chemicals of potential concern from thi investigation (Arsenic and BaP TEQs)? ‘The Agency for Toxic Substances and Discase Registry (ATSDR) is EPA’s lead federal agency on public health issues, To help answer health questions, please contact Dana Robison with ATSDR at (770) 488-3744, or the ATSDR Hotline at | (888) 422-8737. ATSDR has created Fect Sheets on frequently asked health questions on Arsenic and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHS), related to the two chemicals of potential concern for which the soil was tested, To view information on the buman health aspects of these ‘chemicals, please refer to these 2-page Fact Sheets produced by ATSDR at the following Frequently Asked Questions 3 web-site pages: ‘Arsenic bipJfviwwatsdr cdogovAfacts? pdt PAHs (BaP TEQ). hitp:ivww atsde cde. covitoxfags/tfaspPideI21 Aitide25 © Whatare noxt steps? ShortTemm (On November 3-5, 2010 EPA held “one-on-one” private Information Sessions with the property owners ot renters of the properties that were sempled to answer questions about their sampling resuts letters. At the Information Sessions other organizations were present such as: Agency for-Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM), the Jeffetson County Department of Health CDH) and Walter Coke. At a public forum on May 19, 2011, EPA presented the findings and planned next steps to the broader community. Shortterin plans include evaluating the need for additional satapling and potential cleanup. ‘The public will be updated on any new developments, Long-Term Long-term plans include: 1) development of an overall environmental action plan with ‘Walter Coke to address the chemicals of potential concern; 2) work with ATSDR on any. public health related matters associated with the-chemicals of potential concern; anid 3) provide opportunities for the public to meaningfully engage in this process, OTHER QUESTIONS + Which goverment ageney was respousible for the oversight of the recent Community Environniental Sampling Event? ‘The US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is'a federal agency whose mission is to protect human heelth and the environment. ‘The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) authorizes EPA to require facilities to examine the nature and extent of their ‘poteftial pollution that may endanger human health or the environment. Currently, the lead regulatory program on this sampling matter is the EPA's RCRA Corrective Action program located in the Southeast Region 4 Office in Atlanta, Georgia. ‘© Who is Walter Coke, Ine.? Walter Coke (formerly Sioss Industries) fis been operating in this area’ since 1920, processing coal to produce coke for fuel use in blast furnaces and foundries in the steel industry. Sloss Industries (now Walter Coke) entered into a RCRA Section 3008(h) administrative ordet on consent with EPA in 1989 to assess potential contamination regulated by RCRA on and/or off-site from operation of the facility. Walter Coke is cooperating with EPA in the soil evaluation in the Fairmont, Collegeville, and Harriman Park communities. * Is Walter Coke the source of the chemicals found in the soil samples? EPA believes that Walter Coke is at least partially responsible for the chemicals of potential Frequently Asked Questions 4 ‘concem found in the soil samples. EPA may never reach a final determination on all of the sources of the chemicals of potential concern found in the soil samples. This area of ‘Birmingham has been the location of other industries that could also have contributed to the detected chemicals of potential concern, In addition, a number of non-industrial sources, such as car, ailroad and airplane exhaust, residential application of pesticides or use of other hhousehold or yard products, or ashes from grilling or home heating could also have

    S-ar putea să vă placă și