Sunteți pe pagina 1din 79

Review of Electromagnetism

This review is not meant to teach the subject,


but to repeat and to refresh, at least partially,
what you have learnt at university.
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 1
H. Henke
Maxwell's equations (in material)

d
∮ H (⃗r , t )⋅d ⃗s =∬ J (⃗r , t)⋅d A+ dt ∬ D⃗ (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗A
⃗ ⃗ ⃗

d
∮ E (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗s =−dt ∬ B⃗ (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗A

∯ D⃗ (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗A=∭ ρ(⃗r , t) dV


∯ ⃗B(⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗A=0
⃗ ,H
E ⃗ electric and magnetic field
⃗ ,B
D ⃗ electric displacement and magnetic induction

J electric current density
ρ electric charge density

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 2


H. Henke
∬ ⃗J (⃗r , t )⋅d A⃗ stands for all currents going through
the area A. It may consist of 3 parts
⃗J ( ⃗r , t)= J⃗c ( ⃗r ,t )+ J⃗cv ( ⃗r , t)+ J⃗i ( ⃗r , t)

J⃗c ( ⃗r ,t )=κ E
⃗ ( ⃗r , t) conduction current (Ohm's law)
J⃗cv ( ⃗r ,t)=ρ( ⃗r , t) ⃗v ( ⃗r , t) convection current
J⃗i ( ⃗r , t) impressed current

∭ ρ(⃗r , t)dV stands for all charges in the


volume V
Current and charge may have different distributions :
point , line ,surface ,volume
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 3
H. Henke
Maxwell's equations (in differential form)

With Stokes' theorem:

⃗ d ∂ ⃗
B
⃗ ⃗s =∬ ( ∇×E
∮ E⋅d ⃗ )⋅d A=−
⃗ ∬ ⃗ A=−
B⋅d ⃗ ∬ ⃗
⋅d A
dt ∂t
∂ ⃗
B

∬ [ ∇×E⃗ +∂ t ]⋅d A=0⃗

∂ ⃗
B
⃗ ×E
since this is valid for any area : ∇ ⃗ =− (2)
∂t

⃗ ∂ ⃗
D
correspondingly: ⃗ =⃗
∇× H J+ (1)
∂t

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 4


H. Henke
With Gauss' theorem:

⃗ A=
∯ D⋅d ⃗ D
⃗ ∭ ∇⋅⃗ dV =∭ ρdV

[ ⃗
∇⋅⃗
∭ D−ρ]dV =0

since this is valid for any volume : ⃗ D=ρ


∇⋅⃗ (3)

correspondingly : ⃗ B=0
∇⋅⃗ (4)

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 5


H. Henke
Time-harmonic fields

Time-harmonic fields can be written as complex quantities

⃗ ⃗ ⃗ i φ i ωt ̃
⃗ i ωt
E ( ⃗r ,t )=E 0 ( ⃗r )cos(ω t+φ)=ℜ[ E 0 ( ⃗r )e e ]=ℜ[ E ( ⃗r )e ]
̃ ⃗

E ( r )is called phasor.

Advantages are: - ∂/∂t → i ω ,


- phasors are vectors in a coordinate
system rotating with ω t ,
i ωt
- e cancels out in the equations

We will drop the tilde on following transparencies


whenever the situation is sufficiently clear!
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 6
H. Henke
Fields in matter (time-harmonic case)

The effect of electric fields on matter can be described by a


polarization field P, the effect of magnetic fields by a magne-
tization field M.

There are several electric reactions. E.g. a neutral atom


changed to a dipole by a local field Elocal
⃗ =n p⃗e =ϵ0 χ e E
p e =qx → P ⃗
x q
- Elocal
-q n : dipole density
χ e :electric susceptibility
Linear materials:
⃗ 0E
D=ϵ ⃗ +P⃗ =ϵ0 E
⃗ +ϵ0 χe E
⃗ =ϵr ϵ0 E
⃗ =ϵ E

ϵr =1+χe : relative permittivity
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 7
H. Henke
Dielectric behavior is a dynamic process, dependent on
frequency (εr=εr'-i εr'', εr'' respresents the losses):

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 8


H. Henke
Magnetic reaction of material is due to particle spins
(magnetic moments pm). It can be described by means of
magnetic dipoles, i.e. by circulating elementary currents:
pm

p m=π r 2e I e → M
⃗ =n p⃗m=χ m H

re

Ie n : dipole density
χ m : magnetic susceptibility

Linear materials:

B=μ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗
0 H +μ 0 M =μ 0 H +μ 0 χ m H =μ r μ 0 H =μ H
μ r =1+χ m : relative permeability

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 9


H. Henke
For ferromagnetic materials the relation between the external
field and the magnetization is non-linear and depends on the
history of the material (hysteresis).

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 10


H. Henke
⃗ 0E
D=ε ⃗ +ε0 χ P
⃗ and B=μ
⃗ ⃗ ⃗
0 H +μ 0 M

take into account the reaction of the material due to fields


E and H. The reaction is averaged over all atoms and/or
molecules, i.e. over all elementary electric and magnetic
dipoles.

⃗ P
In many materials the relations P= ⃗ (E
⃗ ) and M⃗ =M ⃗ (H
⃗)
are linear .
But in general they are nonlinear , anisotropic , i.e.
⃗ or H
dependent on the direction of E ⃗ , and they are time
or frequency dependent .
They may also include losses .

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 11


H. Henke
There are losses due to radiation and interaction between
electric and magnetic dipoles. Losse are responsible for the
imaginary parts.
ϵ=ϵ' −i ϵ' ' =ϵ' (1−i tan δϵ )
tan δϵ=ϵ' ' /ϵ' , δϵ electric loss angle

μ=μ ' −i μ ' ' =μ ' (1−i tan δμ )


tan δμ=μ ' ' /μ ' , δμ magnetic loss angle
There are also losses due to collisions between free charges
⃗ H=
∇× ⃗ ⃗J+i ω ϵ E=κ
⃗ E+i⃗ ω ϵ E=i
⃗ ωϵ[1+κ/(i ωϵ)] E⃗
ϵc =ϵ'−i ϵ' ' =ϵ[1−i κ/(ωϵ)]
In most dielectrics is tan(δε) « 1
In good conductors is κ/ωε » 1 → εc≈κ/iω

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 12


H. Henke
Boundary / continuity conditions

Maxwell's theory is a continuum theory. It requires continuous,


double differentiable functions.

Solutions in different media have to be matched at the interface


by boundary or continuity conditions.
Take Maxwell's equs. in integral form

d
∮ H (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗s =∬ J (⃗r , t)⋅d A+ dt ∬ D⃗ (⃗r ,t )⋅d ⃗A
⃗ ⃗ ⃗

d
∮ E (⃗r ,t)⋅d ⃗s =−dt ∬ ⃗B (⃗r ,t )⋅d ⃗A

and make an intelligent choice for the integration area:

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 13


H. Henke
⃗n
Δs is finite but small, such that
the fields are constant, then

ΔA H t1 Δ s−H n h−H t2 Δ s+H n h=


=J S Δ s+ ∂ ∬ D⋅Δ
⃗ A⃗
∂t ΔA
JS for h → 0 it becomes
H t1−H t2 =J S
E t1−E t2 =0, correspondingly

If medium 2 is perfectly electric conducting (pec) :


E t1 =0 , H t1 =J S

JS is a surface current density.


JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 14
H. Henke
An intelligent choice of the integration volume:

∯ D⃗ (⃗r , t)⋅d ⃗A=∭ ρ(⃗r , t) dV


∯ ⃗B ( ⃗r , t )⋅d ⃗A=0
D n1 Δ A−D n2 Δ A+ ∬ D⋅d
⃗ ⃗ A=
Δ A zyl
=ρS Δ A
ΔA
for h → 0 it becomes
D n1−D n2 =ρS
B n1−B n2 =0, correspondingly
ΔA If medium 2 is pec : D n1=ρs , B n1=0
ρS ρS is a surface charge density.
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 15
H. Henke
Application of Maxwell's equations

Electrostatic fields (H=0, δ/δt=0, ε=const.)

Maxwell's equations

⃗ E=0
∇× ⃗ ⃗
→ E=− ⃗Φ
∇ ⃗ ∇
since ∇× ⃗ Φ≡0
⃗ D=ρ
∇⋅⃗

Poisson equation :
⃗ D= ⃗ (ϵ E
⃗ ∇⋅ ⃗ )=ρ ⃗ 2 ρ
∇⋅ → ∇ Φ=−ϵ (1)

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 16


H. Henke
Example: Two round tubes forming an electrostatic lense
+Φ 0 −Φ0

E-field pattern

(1) becomes circular symmetric Laplace equation


⃗ 2 ∂
2
Φ 1 ∂ Φ ∂2 Φ
∇ Φ= 2 +ρ + 2 =0 (2)
∂ρ ∂ρ ∂ z

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 17


H. Henke
Bernoulli ansatz
Φ(ρ , z)=R (ρ)Z (z)

substituted in (2) and devided by RZ

1 d2R 1 d R 1 d2Z
2
+ + 2
=0 (3)
R dρ Rρ d ρ ⏟Z dz
k 2z

Last term is independent of ρ and must be constant. It yields


d2 Z 2
2
−k z Z=0
dz

with solutions Z=
{
C 0+D 0 z ,
k z −k z
C e +D e , k z ≠0
z
k z =0
z
}
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 18
H. Henke
Condition at infinity
Φ finite for z=±∞ : C=D 0 =0, Z=
C0 ,
De
−k ∣z∣
k z =0
, k z ≠0 { z
}
The left over equ.(3)is the Bessel differential equation
2
d R 1 dR 2
2
+ ρ dρ +k z R=0

with solutions

R=
{ A0+B 0 ln (ρ/ρ0 ), k z =0
A J 0 (k z ρ)+B N 0 (k z ρ), k z ≠0 }
Condition at ρ → 0
Φ finite for ρ=0 : B 0=B=0
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 19
H. Henke
Boundary conditions

Φ=
{−Φ0 for ρ=a , z>0
+Φ0 for ρ=a , z<0 } (4)

A0 C 0=−sign( z)Φ0 , J 0 (k z a)=0 → k zn a= j 0n

Using above conditions Φ becomes



ρ −j ∣z∣/ a
Φ=sign( z)[−Φ0+∑ An J 0 ( j 0n )e 0n
] (5)
n=1 a

and due to symmetry (4), Φ(z=0)=0, (5) becomes



ρ
Φ0= ∑ An J 0 ( j 0n ) (6)
n=1 a

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 20


H. Henke
To calculate the coefficients An we use a Fourier-Bessel
expansion.
Multiplication of (6) with ρJ0(j0mρ/a) and integration over ρ

a ∞ a
ρ ρ ρ
Φ0 ∫ J 0 ( j 0m )ρ d ρ =∑ A n ∫ J 0 ( j 0n ) J 0 ( j 0m )ρ d ρ

0 a n=1 ⏟0 a a
a2 n a2 2
J (j ) δ J (j )
j 0m 1 0m m
2 1 0m

gives the final result


ρ
∞ J 0 ( j 0n )
a −j ∣z∣/a
Φ=sign( z)Φ0 [−1+2 ∑ e 0n
]
n=1 j 0n J 1 ( j 0n )

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 21


H. Henke
Stationary currents (δ/δt=0, κ=const.)

⃗ H
Maxwell's equations: ∇× ⃗ E
⃗ = J , ∇× ⃗ =0 → E ⃗Φ
⃗ =− ∇

⃗ ∇
∇⋅( ⃗ ×H ⃗ ⃗
⃗ )=0= ∇⋅ ⃗ (κ E
J = ∇⋅ ⃗ 2 Φ=0
⃗) → ∇

similar to electrostatics but different boundary / continuity


conditions: J n =κ E⃗n=−κ d Φ/dn=0.

J-field lines

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 22


H. Henke
Magnetostatic fields (E=0, δ/δt=0, μ=const.)

Maxwell's equations
⃗ B=0
∇⋅⃗ ⃗ A
⃗ ∇×
→ B= ⃗ ⃗ (∇
since ∇⋅ ⃗ × A)=0

⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗
∇×B=μ J → ∇ ×( ∇× A)= ∇ ( ∇⋅A)− ∇ A=μ ⃗
⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ 2⃗
J
Vectorpotential ⃗
A is not fully determined. Substitution
⃗ →⃗
A A+ ∇⃗ ψ (gauge transformation) does not change
B= ⃗ A.
⃗ ∇× ⃗ Gauge ∇⋅ ⃗ ⃗A=0 yields vectorial Poisson equ.
∇⃗ A=−μ
2⃗ ⃗
J
The solution of which (see appendix A1) is
μ ⃗ (⃗r ' )
J
⃗ ⃗r )= ∭
A( dV '
4π R
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 23
H. Henke
Quasi-stationary fields

⃗ ⃗
∣J∣=κ∣E∣≫ ∣ ∣
d
dt

D ⃗ ϵ 1 T
=ω ϵ∣E∣ → κ =T r ≪ ω =

T r is called relaxation time
Maxwell's equations

⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ∂⃗
B ⃗ D ⃗ B
∇× B =μ ⃗J , ⃗
∇× E =− , ∇⋅⃗ =ρ , ∇⋅⃗ =0
∂t
Potentials

⃗ ⃗
∇⋅B =0 → ⃗ ⃗ ⃗
B = ∇× A
⃗ ⃗ ∂ ⃗A ⃗ ∂ ⃗
A ⃗ ∂ ⃗A

∇× E=− ∇× ⃗
, ∇×( E+ ⃗
)=0 → E=− ∇ Φ−
∂t ∂t ∂t

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 24


H. Henke
⃗ B=
∇× ⃗ ∇×
⃗ ∇×( ⃗ A)=⃗ ∇ ⃗ ( ∇⋅
⃗ A)−
⃗ ∇ ⃗ 2 A=

∂ ⃗
A
=μ ⃗ ⃗
⃗ =− ∇ (μ κ Φ)−μ κ
J=μ κ E
∂t
⃗ and Φ are not fully determined. Substituting
A
⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ∂ψ
A → A+ ∇ ψ, Φ → Φ−
∂t
⃗ ⃗ ∂ ⃗
A
does not change B= ⃗ ∇× A ⃗, E⃗ =− ∇ Φ−
∂t
So , use gauge : ⃗ A=−μ
∇⋅ ⃗ κΦ

⃗ 2⃗ ⃗
∂A
→ ∇ A−μ κ =0 vectorial diffusion equation
∂t

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 25


H. Henke
Poynting's theorem (ε, μ, κ=const. and real, J=κE,
full set of Maxwell's equations)
If fields move a charge ρdV by a distance δ s in the
interval δ t , the work done by the fields (dissipated
power) is
δW ⃗ δ⃗s ⃗ +v⃗ × B)⋅
⃗ v⃗ =E⋅ρ
⃗ v⃗ dV = E⋅
⃗ ⃗
d =d f⋅ =ρ dV ( E J dV
δt δt
⃗ ⃗
Express E⋅J with the aid of Maxwell ' s equations
⃗ H ∂ ⃗
D

E⋅ ∇× ⃗ =J⃗ +
∂t
⃗ ⃗
∂B

−H⋅ ∇× E =−⃗
∂t
⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ∂ 1 ⃗ ⃗ 1 ⃗ ⃗
→ − ∇⋅( E × H )=E⋅J + [ E⋅D+ H⋅B ]
∂t 2 2
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 26
H. Henke
We get Poynting's theorem after integration
over V and application of Gauss' law:
V A
⃗ ×H
−∯ ( E ⃗ )⋅d A=

Wmech+Wem
1 ⃗ ⃗ 1 ⃗ ⃗
=∭ E⋅J dV +∂
⃗ ⃗ ∭ ( 2 E⋅D+2 H⋅B)dV
∂t
radiation

Poynting vector (radiation flux) ⃗ E


S= ⃗ ×H⃗
dissipated power density ⃗ ⃗
p d =E⋅J
electric energy density
⃗ D
w e =(1/ 2) E⋅⃗

magnetic energy density ⃗ B


w m =(1/2) H⋅⃗

Energy radiated into the volume V equals the dissipation


plus the increase of stored electromagnetic energy in V.
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 27
H. Henke
Poynting's theorem for time-harmonic fields

⃗ ̃ i ω t 1 ⃗̃ i ωt ⃗̃ −i ω t

decompose e.g. E =ℜ[ E e ]= [ E e + E * e ]
2
1 ⃗ ⃗ 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃ i2 ωt ⃗̃ ⃗̃ −i2 ωt 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃ ⃗̃ *⋅D
⃗̃ ]
w e = E⋅D= [ E⋅D e + E *⋅D * e ]+ [ E⋅D *+ E
2 8 8
1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃ i2 ωt 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃
= ℜ[ E⋅D e ]+ E⋅D *
4 4
̃ ⃗̃∗

and after time-averaging w̄e =(1/ 4) E⋅D
̃ ⃗̃∗
⃗ ̃ ⃗̃∗

correspondingly : w̄m =(1/4) H⋅B , p̄d =(1/ 2) E⋅J

⃗ ̃ ⃗̃ ∗

S c =(1/ 2) E × H complex, time-averaged radiation flux

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 28


H. Henke
Again , using Maxwell ' s equations
⃗̃ ⃗ ̃ ∗ ⃗̃∗
⃗ ̃∗

(1/2) E⋅ ∇× H = J −i ω D
̃∗ ⃗ ⃗̃
⃗ ⃗̃
−(1/ 2) H ⋅ ∇× E =−i ω B
⃗ 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃∗ 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃∗ 1 ⃗̃∗ ⃗̃ 1 ⃗̃ ⃗̃∗
→ − ∇⋅( E × H )= E⋅J +i 2 ω( H ⋅B− E⋅D )
2 2 4 4
we get Poynting's theorem after integration over V and
application of Gauss' law:
−∯ S⃗c⋅d A=
⃗ ∭ p̄d dV +i2 ω ∭ ( w̄m −w̄e )dV

Active power (time-averaged Joulean heat, dissipation)


̄ act =−∯ ℜ[ S⃗c ]⋅d A=
P ⃗ ∭ p̄d dV =P̄d

Reactive power
P̄ react =−∯ ℑ[ S⃗c ]⋅d A=2
⃗ ω∭ ( w̄m−w̄e )dV =2 ω( W̄ m−W̄ e )

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 29


H. Henke
In good conductors is Wm»We (lEl«lHl)

−∯ S⃗c⋅d ⃗
A= P̄c = P̄d +i2 ω W̄ m

This allows to calculate the resistance and internal


inductance of a conductor. We define

I *=∮ H⃗*⋅d ⃗
s H
s2 E
U=∫ E⋅d
⃗ ⃗ s =I (R+i ω L i ) s2
s1
s1
and obtain
1 * 1 2
P c = U I = ∣I ∣(R+i ω Li )=P
̄ ̄ d +i2 ω W
̄m
2 2
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 30
H. Henke
Electromagnetic waves (ε, μ=const., ρ=J=0)

The simplest electromagnetic wave is a plane wave.


It depends only on one space variable (direction of
propagation) and on the time.
⃗ =E
E ⃗ (z ,t ), ⃗ =H
H ⃗ (z ,t )

⃗ ∂ ⃗
E ⃗ ∂ ⃗
H
⃗ =ϵ
First two Maxwell's eqs. ∇× H ⃗ =−μ
, ∇×E
∂t ∂t
give two sets of uncoupled equations:
∂Hy ∂Ex ∂Ex ∂Hy
− =ϵ =−μ
∂z ∂t ∂z ∂t
∂Hx ∂Ey ∂Ey ∂Hx
=ϵ − =−μ
∂z ∂t ∂z ∂t

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 31


H. Henke
From the red set e.g. follows the wave equation
2 2
∂ Ex 1 ∂ Ex 1
2
− 2 2 =0 , c= √ μ ϵ
∂z c ∂t

with d'Alembert's solution


+ -
E x =f (z−ct )+g (z+ct )=E x +E x
μ
ZH y =f (z−ct )−g (z+ct )=ZH −ZH ,
+
y
-
y √
Z= ϵ

Similar solutions follow from the blue set with E y and Hx.
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 32
H. Henke
1
velocity of light : c= √μ ϵ

μ
wave impedance: Z= ϵ √
≈377Ω infree space
field properties :

⃗ ⊥H
E ⃗
⃗ E
S= ⃗ ×H⃗ → direction of propagation
⃗ ,H
E ⃗ are ⊥ to direction of propagation
+ + − −
E /H =−E /H =Z

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 33


H. Henke
Time-harmonic plane wave ( ∂ =i ω , ϵr =ϵr ' −i ϵr ' ' )
∂t
Wave equation becomes Helmholtz equation:
2 ̃
∂ Ex 2 ̃
2
+k E x =0 , k =ω √ μ ϵ
∂z
i (ω t−kz) i (ω t +kz) + -
E x =A e +B e =E x +E x
i (ωt−kz) i (ωt +kz) + -
ZH y =A e −B e =ZH y −ZH y

loss-free material: k =ω/c=2 π /λ

lossy dielectric: k=ω √μ ϵr ϵ0=β−i α


α: attenuation constant , β: phase constant

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 34


H. Henke
√ √ √ √
2 2
β ϵr ' ϵr ' ϵr ' ' α ϵr ' ϵr ' ϵr ' '
= + 1+( ) , = − + 1+( )
k0 2 2 ϵr ' k0 2 2 ϵr '

+ i (ω t−kz) −α z
real physical field: E =ℜ A e
x =A cos(ω t−β z )e

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 35


H. Henke
Low-loss dielectrics: εr''«εr'
1 ϵr ' ' Z0 i ϵr ' '
β≈ √ ϵr ' k 0 , α≈ k0, Z≈ (1+ )
2 √ ϵr ' √ ϵr ' 2 ϵr '
Example: Polyamide (nylon), κ=10-8 Ω-1m-1, εr=3, f=10MHz
11% attenuation in 100km, arc Z≈10-4 °

Very good conductors (metallic): εr''≈-iκ/ω » εr'

ωμ κ 1
β≈α≈
2 √= ,
δS
Z≈(1+i) α
κ, arc Z =45°

−α δ S 1
Skin depth (z=δS): e = → α δ S =1
e

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 36


H. Henke
In general, β is a function of ω and is called dispersion relation.
Developing β around ω0

dβ 2
β(ω)=β(ω0 )+( ) d ω+O [(d ω) ]
dω ω 0

Phase velocity
dϕ dz
ϕ=ω t∓β z=const. → =ω∓β =ω∓β v ph=0
dt dt
v ph=± ω
β(ω0 )

vph has no physical importance. Monochromatic waves


carry no information.
Example: Water waves at shore
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 37
H. Henke
Group velocity (velocity with which a signal propagates)
As an example take two plane waves with ω1 and ω2

ω1=ω0+δ ω , ω 2=ω0−δ ω
β1=β0+δβ , β2=β0−δβ
i (ω1 t−β1 z ) i (ω2 t −β 2 z )
ℜ[e +e ]=2 cos(δ ω t −δβ z)cos(ω0 t −β 0 z)
δ ω dω
vg= → v g =( )
δβ dβ ω 0

vg is the velocity with which the envelope propagates.


Signals with small bandwidth 2δω propagate with vg.

Large bandwidth signals require higher order terms O((δω)2).

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 38


H. Henke
Energy velocity

Energy transported ΔA
by Δz in time Δt: Δz

w
̄ Δ AΔz Δ z Sc
=Sc Δ A → v e= =
Δt Δt w ̄
for plane waves
2
1 ⃗ ⃗ * ∣E 0∣ 1 ⃗ ⃗* 1 ⃗ ⃗* 1 2
S c = ( E × H )= , w ̄ = E⋅D + H⋅B = ϵ∣E 0∣
2 2Z 4 4 2
1 1
v e= = √ μ ϵ =c

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 39


H. Henke
Cylindrical, ideal conducting waveguides

κ=∞
z
Substituting one of the 2 first Maxwell's equ. into the other gives
a 2nd order diff. equ., which requires 2 independent functions.
The 3d and 4th equ. are additional conditions.
These conditions and the required independent functions are
fulfilled by

⃗ =0 → E⃗TE = ∇×
⃗ E
∇⋅ ⃗ A⃗TE , A⃗ =A e⃗z , TE−waves
TE TE

⃗ ⃗ ⃗
TM ⃗
∇⋅H=0 → H = ∇× A , ⃗TM ⃗
TM TM
A =A e⃗z , TM−waves

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 40


H. Henke
With the vector potentials A one gets e.g. for TE-waves
⃗ H ∂ ⃗
E ∂ ⃗ A ⃗ H−ϵ ∂ ⃗
A
∇× ⃗ =ϵ =ϵ ∇× ⃗ → ∇×( ⃗ )
∂t ∂t ∂t
⃗ ∂ ⃗
A
→ ⃗ ∇ Φ+ϵ
H=
∂t
and from Maxwell's 2nd equ.
⃗ ∂ ⃗
H
∇ ×E ⃗ =−μ →
∂t
2⃗
⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ ⃗ 2⃗ ⃗ ∂ Φ ∂ A
∇ ×( ∇ × A)= ∇ ( ∇⋅A)− ∇ A=− ∇ (μ )−μ ϵ 2
∂t ∂t
⃗ ,Φ are not fully determined. Substituting
A
⃗ → A+
A ⃗ ∇ ⃗ ψ, Φ → Φ−ϵ∂ ψ/ ∂ t
yields the same E ⃗ , H.

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 41


H. Henke
One can make a gauge-transformation and choose
e.g. the Lorenz gauge
⃗ A=−μ
∇⋅⃗ ∂Φ
∂t
which results in a vectorial wave equ.
⃗ 2
⃗ 2⃗ 1 ∂ A
∇ A− 2 2 =0
c ∂t
Similarily, we proceed for the TM-case and obtain the same equ..
Since A has only a cartesian component, the vectorial wave equ.
becomes a scalar one and in case of time-harmonic fields a
scalar Helmholtz equ.
⃗ 2 A p +k 2 A p=0 ,
∇ k = ω =ω √μ ϵ,
c { }
p= TE
TM
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 42
H. Henke
Circular waveguide

Helmholtz equ. for


circular cylinder coordinates :
2 2
1∂ ∂A 1 ∂ A ∂ A 2

ρ ∂ρ ∂ ρ )+ 2 2
+ 2
+k A=0 (1)
ρ ∂φ ∂z

Bernoulli ansatz: A=R (ρ)Φ(φ) Z (z)

Substituted in (1) and devision by RΦZ


1 ∂ ∂ R 1 ∂2 Φ 1 ∂2 Z 2
(ρ )+ 2 + +k =0 (2)
ρ R ∂ρ ∂ρ ρ Φ ∂φ ⏟
2
Z ∂z 2

2
−k z

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 43


H. Henke
d2Z 2 −ik z ik z −ik z
2
+k z Z =0 → Z =C 1 e +C 2 e z
→ C 1 e z z

dz
for waves propagating in +z-direction

(2) becomes with kz

ρ ∂ ∂ R 1 ∂2 Φ 2 2 2
(ρ )+ +ρ (k −k z )=0 (3)
R ∂ρ ∂ρ Φ ∂φ 2

−k 2μ

2
d Φ 2
2
+k μ Φ=0 → Φ=C 3 cos(k μ φ)+C 4 sin (k μ φ)

→ Φ=C 3 cos(m φ)

because of 2π-periodicity and free choice of origin


JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 44
H. Henke
With m and kz (3) becomes Bessel's equ.
∂2 R 1 ∂ R m 2

c √
2 2 2
2
+ ρ ∂ρ +[ k c − 2
] R=0, k = k −k z
∂ρ ρ
R=C 5 J m (k c ρ)+C 6 N m (k c ρ) → R=C 5 J m (k c ρ)
because Neumann's function is infinite at ρ=0

Vector potential :
−ik z
A=C m cos(m φ)J m (k c ρ)e z

TE−waves : E ⃗
⃗ = ∇×( A e⃗z )
E φ=−∂ A/∂ρ∼J m ' (k c ρ)
E φ (ρ=a)=0 → k cmn a= j ' mn
th
j ' mn : n non vanishing zero of J ' m
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 45
H. Henke
1 ∂A m ρ −ik z
E ρ=ρ =−ρ C mn sin (m φ) J m ( j ' mn )e z

∂ϕ a
∂A j ' mn ρ −ik z
E φ =− =− C mn cos(m φ) J ' m ( j ' mn )e z

∂ρ a a

⃗ E=−i
∇× ⃗ ⃗:
ωμ H
k z j ' mn ρ −ik z
H ρ= ωμ C mn cos(m φ) J ' m ( j ' mn )e z

a a
kz m ρ −ik z
H φ =−ωμ ρ C mn sin (m φ) J m ( j ' mn )e z

a
2
−1 j ' mn ρ −ik z
H z= ( ) C mn cos(m φ) J m ( j ' mn )e z

i ωμ a a

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 46


H. Henke
TM −waves : H ⃗
⃗ = ∇×( A e⃗z ) , ∇×⃗ H ⃗ =i ω ϵ E

2
kc
E z= A∼J m (k c ρ), E z (ρ=a)=0 → k cmn a= j mn
iωϵ

m ρ −ik z
H ρ=−ρ D mn sin(m φ) J m ( j mn )e z

a
j mn ρ −ik z
H φ =− D mn cos(m φ) J ' m ( j mn )e , z
H z =0
a a
k z j mn ρ −ik z
E ρ=−ω ϵ D mn cos(m φ) J ' m ( j mn )e z

a a
kz m ρ −ik z
E φ = ω ϵ ρ Dmn sin (m φ) J m ( j mn )e z

a
2
1 j mn ρ −ik z
E z= ( ) D mn cos(m φ) J m ( j mn )e z

iωϵ a a

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 47


H. Henke
The ratio of the transverse field components
is the field (wave) impedance
TE ωμ

{ }
Eρ Eφ ZF =
Z F= =− = kz
Hφ Hρ TM kz
Z F =ω ϵ

The dependence of the propagation constant kz on frequency


is the dispersion relation
k cmn=k −k zmn → k zmn = √ k −k cmn
2 2 2 2 2

{ }
real k >k cmn propagation
k zmn= 0 for k =k cmn
imaginary k <k cmn attenuation

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 48


H. Henke
critical wavenumber :
{
k cmn= j mn ' /a for TE
j mn /a TM }
cutoff frequency : f cmn=c k cmn / 2 π
cutoff wavelength : λ cmn =2 π/k cmn
λ
guide wavelength : λ zmn=2 π/ k zmn=
√ 1−(λ / λ cmn
2
)
free space wavelength λ

1 ⃗ ⃗* 1 2 2
energy flux density S cz = ( E × H )z = Z F [∣H ρ∣ +∣H φ∣ ]
2 2

{ }
imaginary k <k c
= 0 for k =k c
real k >k c

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 49


H. Henke
Each mn defines a certain (eigen-) mode. The general solution
is the linear combination of all modes

E =∑ ∑ ( E mn+ E mn ),
⃗ ⃗ TE ⃗ TM
H =∑ ∑ ( H mn+ H mn )
⃗ ⃗ TE ⃗ TM

m n m n

Modes are normally sorted refering to their cutoff frequency:

type m n (fc / GHz)(a/cm)

TE 1 1 8.78
TM 0 1 11.46
TE 2 1 14.56
TE/TM 0/1 1/1 18.29
TE 3 1 20.05

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 50


H. Henke
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 51
H. Henke
Copper waveguide with a=2.5 cm

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 52


H. Henke
Impedance boundary condition on ⃗t
good conductors
⃗n
1. In metals (high conductivity κ) we can neglect
the displacement current compared to the z
conduction current, (IδD/δtI<<IJI).
2. On metallic surfaces is approximately E┴, H║.
3. Tangential to the surface the typical length of change is λ0.
Normal to the surface, in the metal, the typical length of
change is δS << λ0.
4. Assumptions 1 through 3 allow for the derivation of a
very good approximation for the tangential surface fields
(see appendix 2)
⃗ ⃗ 1+i
E t0≈Z W ( n× H t0 ),
⃗ ZW = , wall impedance
κδ s
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 53
H. Henke
Attenuation in waveguides (power-loss method)

P(z) P(z+Δz)≈P(z)+(dP(z)/dz)Δz
Pd'Δz
z

Δz
dP (z )
conservation of power : =−P d '
dz
⃗ ⃗ −α z −2 α z dP (z )
E , H∼e , P (z)∼e → =−2 α P (z)=−P d '
dz
dissipation per waveguide surface area:
Δ Pd ⃗ 1 ⃗ ⃗* 1 ⃗ 2
=−⃗ n⋅( E t0 × H t0 ))= ℜ(Z W )∣H t0 ∣
n⋅ℜ( S c )=− ℜ( ⃗
ΔA 2 2
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 54
H. Henke
Δ Pd 1 2

ΔA
=
2 κ δs
∣H t0 ∣

dissipation per waveguide length :


1 2
⃗ t0 ∣ ds
Pd ' =
2 κ δS
∮∣H

transported active power :


⃗ ⃗ 1 ⃗ × H⃗∗ )⋅e⃗z dA=
P (z )=∬ ℜ( S c )⋅d A= ∬ ℜ( E
2
1 ⃗ ∗⃗ 1 ⃗ 2
= ∬ ℜ( E transv × H transv )z dA= Z F ∬∣H transv∣ dA
2 2

1 Pd '
attenuation : α=
2 P (z )

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 55


H. Henke
Resonant cavities

Example: Cylindrical cavity, radius a, length g, TM-modes


Superposition of forward and backward traveling waves
(see transp. 49)
kz m −ik z ik z
E φ=ω ϵ ρ Dmn sin (m φ)J m (k cmn ρ)[e −r mn e ] z z

Boundary conditions fix r and k z


E φ (z=0)=0 → r mn=1 , E φ∼sin (k z z )
E φ (z=g)=0 → k zp g=p π , p=0, 1, 2,...

Now, the other field components can be calculated from the


vector potential, see appendix A3.

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 56


H. Henke
Example: TM010-resonator (m=0, n=1, p=0)
j 01 ρ
H φ=2 D 010 J 1 ( j 01 )
a a
2
2 j 01 ρ
E z =−i ω ϵ ( ) D 010 J 0 ( j 01 )
a a
ω010 j 01
Resonance frequency k 010 = =k c01 =
c0 a
ω010 j 01 c 0
f 010= =
2π 2πa
Stored energy
1 ⃗ ⃗ ϵ 2
W =W e+W m =2 W e= ∭ E⋅D dV = ∭∣E z∣ dV
̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ *
2 2

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 57


H. Henke
4
2 π g j 2 2
01
̄
W= 2 ∣D 010∣ J 1 ( j 01 )
2
ω010 ϵ a

Dissipation per unit area


1 ⃗ 2
P̄d ' ' =
2 κ δs
∣H t0∣
total dissipation
4π 2 g 2 2
P d =∯ P d ' ' dA=
̄ ̄ j (1+ )∣D 010∣ J 1 ( j 01 )
κ δs 01 a

Quality factor (Q-value)

̄ 1
ω 010 W g V Volume
Q0 = = → δs Q 0=2 ∼
P̄d δ s 1+g /a S Surface

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 58


H. Henke
Q0 gives the decay rate of the stored energy or the time
Tf to fill the cavity.

From power conservation


dW ̄ ω 010 −2t /T f Q0
− ̄ d=
=P ̄
W → ̄ =W̄ 0 e
W , T f =2 ω
dt Q0 010

Example: 3 Ghz copper cavity, g=λ010/2=5 cm

j01=2.405, J1(j01)=0.5191, κ=58•106 Ω-1m-1

a=3.83 cm, δS=1.21 μm, Q0=17963, Tf=1.9μs

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 59


H. Henke
Resonance behaviour of a cavity mode

Instead of lossy walls assume ideal conducting walls and


lossy dielectric filling. That preserves the ideal mode but
allows for studying losses.
The cavity is driven by a current J passing through it. J splits
into a conduction current Jc=κE, responsible for the losses in
the dielectric, and in an enforced current J0 as driving term:
⃗ ∇×
∇×( ⃗ E ⃗ ( ∇⋅
⃗ )= ∇ ⃗ E⃗ )− ∇ ⃗ =−μ ∂ ∇×
⃗2 E ⃗ H⃗=
∂t
∂ ∂E ⃗

=−μ ( J 0+κ E +ϵ ⃗ )
∂t ∂t
∂ ⃗
E ∂
2⃗
E ∂ ⃗
J
⃗ 2 E−μ
∇ ⃗ κ −μ ϵ 2 =μ
0
with gauge ∇⋅⃗ E
⃗ =0 (1)
∂t ∂t ∂t

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 60


H. Henke
We expand E in (eigen-)modes

⃗ =∑ a r (t ) e⃗r (x , y , z),
E r goes over all m,n,p (2)
r

where ∇⃗ e⃗r +k r e⃗r =0


2 2

⃗ e⃗ =0 in volume,
∇⋅ n
⃗ ×e⃗r =0 on walls
r

∭ r s
e
⃗ ⋅e⃗ dV =δ s
r

Substituting (2) in (1) and deviding by -με

d 2 ar da k 2
1 ∂ J⃗0

r r
∑ [ dt 2 ϵ dt +μ ϵ a r ] e⃗r =−ϵ ∂ t . (3)
r

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 61


H. Henke
Multiplying (3) with es and integrating over V
2 2 ⃗0
d as κ da k 1 ∂ J ∂f s
+ϵ s
+μ ϵ a s =−ϵ ∭
s
⋅e⃗s dV = . (4)
dt
2
dt ∂t ∂t

In case of time-harmonic excitation (4) becomes


2
κ2 k s
[−ω +i ϵ ω+μ ϵ ]a s =i ω f s
Qs fs ϵωs
a s =ω ω , ωs =ck s , Q s = .
s ω
1+iQ s [ ω −ω ] s κ
s

Now replace Qs by Q0 as calculated with impedance-boundary-


condition and ωs by the resonance frequency ωmnp.

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 62


H. Henke
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 63
H. Henke
Well seperated modes can be represented by a lumped
element resonator

Cs Ls Rs

1 ωs W s
ωs = , Qs= =ωs R s C s
√ Ls C s P ds
(ωs +δ ω)−(ωs−δ ω) δ ω 1
Bandwidth B s = =2 ω =
ωs s Qs
Qs 1
Filling time T fs =2 ω =
s δω

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 64


H. Henke
Accelerating voltage for a particle passing the cavity
on-axis with velocity v
g


V s = ∫ a s e s⋅e z e dz ,
0
⃗ ⃗ i ωt
∣ z=vt

Shunt impedance (available Vs for given Pds)


V 2s
R shs = =2R s
P ds
R-upon-Q (available Vs for given Ws, geometrical quantity,
independent of losses)
2
R shs V s 2
= =
Qs ω s W s ωs C s

ωs, Qs and Rshs/Qs define Rs, Ls , Cs .


JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 65
H. Henke
Appendix

A1 Solution of the vectorial diffusion equation

We decompose the vectorial equ.


∇⃗ 2 A=−μ
⃗ ⃗
J
into cartesian components
∇⃗ 2 A =−μ J , i=x , y , z
i i (1)
Coulomb's law gives the field and scalar potential of a point
charge q:

⃗= q ⃗ dΦ q
E e =− ∇ Φ → E r =−
2 ⃗r
→ Φ=
4πϵr dr 4πϵr

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 66


H. Henke
Φ is solution of the inhomogeneous Poisson equ.
⃗ 2 q
∇ Φ=− ϵ δ(r) (2)
Comparing (1) and (2), we see that (1) follows from (2) by
substituting
1
Φ → Ai , ϵ → μ, q → Ji (3)
Next we use the solution Φ of (2) as a „Green's function“ to
calculate the potential of a charge distribution. This yields the
Coulomb integral

1 ρ( ⃗r ' )
Φ( ⃗r )=
4 π ϵ0
∭ R
dV ' (4)

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 67


H. Henke
ρ dV '
ρ ⃗
R =⃗r −⃗r '
⃗r '
P ( ⃗r )
⃗r

Using the substitution (3) in (4) we get the solution of (1).


The vectorial form is then

μ ⃗J ( ⃗r ' )
A ( ⃗r )= ∭
⃗ dV '
4π R

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 68


H. Henke
A2 Impedance boundary condition on good conductors

⃗t
On ideal conducting surfaces is the E-field
perpendicular and the H-field tangential. On ⃗n
good metallic conductors we expect similar z
behaviour.

We decompose fields and nabla operator into


tangential and normal components
⃗ = E⃗t +E z e⃗z ,
E ⃗ = H⃗ t +H z e⃗z ,
H ⃗ ∇
∇= ⃗ + e⃗ ∂
t z
∂z
and subsequently also Maxwell's equs., where we neglect
the displacement current as compared to the conduction
current, IδD/δtI<<IJI:

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 69


H. Henke
1 1 ∂ ⃗t
H
⃗ H
∇× ⃗ =κ E
⃗: E⃗t =− κ e⃗z × ∇⃗ t H z + κ e⃗z ×
∂z
1 ⃗ ⃗
E z e⃗z = κ ∇ t × H t

i i ∂ ⃗t
E
⃗ E
∇× ⃗ =−i ωμ0 H ⃗ E+
⃗ : H⃗ t =−ωμ e⃗z × ∇ e⃗z ×
0 t z ωμ 0 ∂z
i ⃗ × E⃗
H z e⃗z = ωμ ∇ t t
0

Tangential to the surface the typical length of change is λ 0 .


Normal to the surface, in metal, the typical length of change
is δS ≪λ 0 .
With an order of magnitude approximation ∣∇ ⃗ ∣≈1/ λ
t 0
one gets for the magnitude of E z and H z

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 70


H. Henke
2
1 ⃗ 1 δ
∣ ⃗ ∣ 0
⃗ s
∣E z∣= κ ∇ t × H t ≈ κ λ ∣H t ∣=π( λ ) Z 0∣H⃗ t ∣
0

i 1 Z0 1 ⃗
∣ ⃗ ⃗
Z 0∣H z∣= ωμ ∇ t × E t ≈ ωμ
0 ∣ 0 λ0
∣ ⃗
E t ∣= ∣E t ∣.

With that we estimate the green terms


2 2
1 1 δs 1 δs ⃗
∣ ⃗ ∣
κ e⃗z × ∇ t H z ≈ κ λ 0 ∣H z∣=π( λ 0 ) Z 0∣H z∣≈ 2 ( λ 0 ) ∣E t ∣
2
i 1 1 1 δs ⃗
∣ ⃗

ωμ 0 e⃗z× ∇ t E z ≈ ωμ 0 λ 0 ∣E z∣= 2 π Z ∣E z∣≈ 2 ( λ 0 ) ∣H t ∣.
0

One finds that they can be neglected compared to Et, Ht .


So, the tangential parts of Maxwell's equs. are simplified to
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 71
H. Henke
∂ H⃗ t
κ E⃗t ≈e⃗z× (1)
∂z
∂ ⃗t
E
i ωμ 0 H⃗ t ≈−e⃗z× .
∂z
Eliminating E⃗t one gets an equ. for H⃗ t
⃗t
∂2 H

2 −i ωμ 0 κ H t =0
∂z
with the solution
H⃗ t = H⃗t0 e−(1+i ) z /δ .
s
(2)

(2) substituted into (1) gives a boundary condition


at real (non-ideal) metallic surfaces
⃗ ⃗ 1+i
E t0≈Z W ( n
⃗ ×H t0 ), ZW= wall impedance
κ δs

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 72


H. Henke
A3 Cylindrical cavity, radius a, length g, TM-modes

Superposition of forward and backward traveling waves


(see transp. 49) gives for the E φ component
kz m −ik z ik z
E φ =ω ϵ ρ D mn sin (m φ)J m (k cmn ρ)[e −r mn e ] z z

Boundary conditions fix r and k z


E φ (z=0)=0 → r mn=1, E φ∼sin (k z z )
E φ (z=g )=0 → k zp g=p π , p=0, 1, 2,...

and the vector potential can be written as


A=2D cos(m φ)cos(k zp z)J m (k cmn ρ)

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 73


H. Henke
TM-modes follow from H ⃗ A e⃗ ), i ω ϵ E
⃗ = ∇×( ⃗ = ⃗ H
∇× ⃗ as
z
m
H ρ=−2 ρ D mnp sin(m φ)cos(k zp z)J m (k cmn ρ)
H φ=−2k cmn D mnp cos(m φ)cos(k zp z)J m ' (k cmn ρ), H z =0
k zp
E ρ=i2 ω ϵ k cmn D mnp cos(m φ)sin (k zp z )J m ' (k cmn ρ)
k zp m
E φ=−i2 ω ϵ ρ D mnp sin(m φ)sin(k zp z)J m (k cmn ρ)
2
k cmn
E z =−i2 ω ϵ D mnp cos(m φ)cos(k zp z )J m (k cmn ρ)
2
j mn ωmnp j mn
k cmn= √ k −k zp=
2 2 2
→ k mnp = =( ) +k zp
a c0 a

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 74


H. Henke
Literature:

David K. Cheng, Field and wave electromagnetics.


Addison-Wesley 1990

David J. Griffiths, Introduction to electrodynamics.


Prentice Hall 1999

J. D. Jackson, Classical electrodynamics.


John Wiley & Sons 1975

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 75


H. Henke
Exercise 1:
Given is a conducting hollow sphere carrying a charge Q.
What is the field inside and outside and what is the stored
energy?
If the sphere is a model for an electron (E0e= 511keV) what
is then the classical electron radius re=a ?

a Q

Exercise 2:
A capacotor is filled with a lossy dielectric and charged to a
voltage V. What is the time constant for discharge?
A

εr κ V, C

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 76


H. Henke
Exercise 3:
A long dipole magnet is excited by a coil with n windings
and current I0. Calculate the magnetic field in the air gap.

nI0 g

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 77


H. Henke
Exercise 4:

Derive the multi-poles for a static 2-dimensional circular


magnetic field.
Remark: Solve the magnetic potential equation in circular
cylindrical coordinates and free-space.

Exercise 5:
Give the E- and H-field of a z-polarized plane wave which
propagates in x-direction.
What is the time-averaged radiated power density?

JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 78


H. Henke
Exercise 6:

Derive the longitudinal vector potential for TM-waves in a


rectangular waveguide.
What is the equation for the separation constants?

b
a
Exercise 7:
Give the guide wavelength and phase and group
velocity of a TM11-mode in a rectangular waveguide.
Exercise 8:
Calculate the accelerating voltage, shunt impedance and
R-upon-Q of a TM110-mode in a rectangular cavity
resonator with dimensions a,b,g.
JUAS 2018: Review Electromagnetism 79
H. Henke

S-ar putea să vă placă și