Lifting Analysis Report - Rev B

KO DRUM PLATFORM
LIFTING ANALYSIS
0 APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUTION
B ISSUED FOR APPROVAL
A 20/05/05 ANA ISSUED FOR CLIENT

COMMENTS
CHECK APPR. APPR. APPR.
REV. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
ENGINEER APPROVAL CONTRACTOR COMPANY
STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved
TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN

WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER
CLASS REVISION STATUS

DOCUMENT NUMBER AG-OFS-004
1 B A
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES
DATE: 08/08/05
KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 2 of 31
ATTACHMENTS
REVISIONS
PAGE REMARKS REVISIONS REMARKS
APP PAGES
A B C D E A B C D E
1 X A 8 X X
2 X B 22 X X
3 X C 2 X X
4 X D 2 X X
5 X E 16 X X
6 X F 10 X X
7 X G 2 X X
8 X
9 X
10 X
11 X
12 X
13 X
14 X
15 X
16 X
17 X
18 X
19 X
20 X
21 X
22 X
23 X
24 X
25 X REVISIONS
EXHI. PAGES REMARKS
26 X A B C D E
27 X
28 X
29 X
30 X
31 X
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 3 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 6
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS................................................................................6
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION............................................................................................7
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY..................................................................................................7
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY..............................................................................................7
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD............................................................................................8
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS.......................................................................9
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS...........................................9
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS................................10
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION...............................................................................................10
3 DESIGN PREMISES..........................................................................................................11
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS....................................................................................11
3.2 MATERIAL................................................................................................................ 11
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM.........................................................................................12
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM......................................................................................................... 12
4 COMPUTER MODEL......................................................................................................... 14
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS..........................................................................................14
4.1.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................... 14
4.1.2 ALLOWABLE STRESS................................................................................................ 14
4.1.3 CONTINGENCY FACTOR...........................................................................................14
4.1.4 DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR.........................................................................15
4.1.5 CONSEQUENCE FACTOR.......................................................................................... 15
4.1.6 SKEW EFFECT............................................................................................................ 15
4.1.7 RIGGING ARRANGEMENT......................................................................................... 15
4.1.8 COG VARIATION......................................................................................................... 16
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL............................................................................................18
4.2.1 GENERAL VIEW.......................................................................................................... 18
4.2.2 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................. 19
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM...........................................................................................19
4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM.............................................................................................19
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS......................................................................................19
4.5.1 HOOK POINT............................................................................................................... 19
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 4 of 31
4.5.2 SLINGS........................................................................................................................ 19
4.5.3 MODEL GLOBAL STABILITY.....................................................................................19
5 LOADING........................................................................................................................... 21
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION..........................................................................21
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION.......................................................................21
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS.....................................................................................23
5.3.1 PRE-LOADING COMBINATION..................................................................................23
5.3.2 LOADING COMBINATION WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE FACTOR............................24
5.3.3 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER CONNECTING TO PADEYE...................24
5.3.4 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER NOT CONNECTING TO PADEYE..........25
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS......................................................................................................... 26
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY..............................................................................................26
6.1.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD.................................................................................................. 26
6.1.2 PRE-LOADINGS AND LOADING COMBINATION......................................................26
6.1.3 LOADING SUMMARY AND COG................................................................................27
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS..............................................................................................28
6.3 SLINGS LOAD......................................................................................................... 28
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS.......................................................................................29
6.4.1 MEMBER CONNECTED TO PADEYE.........................................................................29
6.4.2 MEMBER NOT CONNECTED TO PADEYE................................................................29
6.5 REACTION............................................................................................................... 29
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS..............................................................................31
ATTACHMENTS
APPENDIX A PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION
APPENDIX B STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY
APPENDIX C JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS
APPENDIX D UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS
APPENDIX E SACS INPUT FILE
APPENDIX F SACS OUTPUT FILE
Appendix F1 Maximum Joint Deflection List
Appendix F2 Member Unity Check Summary

DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 5 of 31
APPENDIX G REFERENCES DRAWING

DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 6 of 31
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

The purpose of this calculation is to check the adequacy of Adjacent Wellhead to sustain the loads
that may occur during the lifting conditions, which comprise of :
 The dead weight of KO Drum Platform
 The dynamic amplification due to offshore site.
 The lifting sling load distribution accounting for CoG variation and sling length inaccuracy.
 The design of lifting padeyes
The calculation is based on the design data and the requirements in the Structural Design Basis ,
General Specification, General Specification for Design of Offshore Topside Structure (Ref. 7),
General Specification for Load-out, Sea-fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore
Structures (Ref. 10) & API RP2A-WSD 21st – 2000 Edition (Ref. 11).
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 7 of 31
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY

The detail weight summary of KO DRUM lifting condition without contingency as well as with
contingency is given in the following table. Definition and detail of the loading condition is given in
chapter 5.1.
Unit : kN
Actual Weight
Actual with
Structure Loading Condition Weight Cont's Contingencies
Main Structure Self Weight 175.327 1.2075 211.619
KO DRUM Structural Appurtenance 93.576 1.2075 112.946
Piping Dry Weight 78.507 1.3750 108.339
Equipment Dry Weight 179.638 1.3750 247.003
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

The centre of gravity and origin co-ordinates are shown below :
A B Platform North
12 m
281L
1
299L
KO Drum KO DRUM
X
Deck Center
(-0.000, 0.000)
Y
5.0 m
KO DRUM CoG
(0.73,0.78)
2
201L 219L
The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 8 of 31
CoG (m)
Structure x y
KO DRUM 0.73 0.78
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads is performed with considering the 1.30 dynamic amplification factor and
shifted of centre of gravity location. The slings angles are measured between slings and the
horizontal plane (degree) see sketch below.
3 4
HOOK
POINT
1 2
Adjacent Wellhead
Point Vertical Angle(
No. Point Member Degree
1 201L 201L-H 74.58
2 219L 219L-H 74.58
3 281L 281L-H 67.11
4 299L 299L-H 67.11
The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

Padeye on the KO DRUM:
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 9 of 31
Lifting Point Type Attached to: Load Case Member Load (kN)
Padeye 201L – plan (+) 5.12 m LPA1 201L - H 397.6752
Padeye LPA2 219L - H 405.5302
Padeye LPA3 281L - H 540.2646
Padaye LPA4 299L - H 647.7098
From the above member sling load table, the maximum sling load KO DRUM is 647.7098 kN. Thus,
this load will be used for pad-eyes design. The pad-eye design and calculation will be explained in
Appendix A in this report.
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS
Maximum stress ratios obtained for members are :

Members connected to padeye :
The maximum interaction ratio below is checked with the consequence factor of 1.35.
Load
Location Member Properties Case UC
A001-A080 W21x62 NLP1 0.87
KO DRUM
Members not connected to padeye :

These member below are not connected to the lift points. These members are checked with
the consequence factor of 1.15.
Load
Location Member Properties Case UC
A001-A080 W21X62 FLP1 0.74
KO DRUM
All member have satisfied the API RP2A WSD – 21 st Edition / AISC 9 th Edition code checking
requirements in lifting condition.
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, punching shear check is
not performed in the analysis.
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 10 of 31
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, joint minimum required
strength ratios is not resulted in the analysis.
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION

The maximum joint deflection occurred on the lifting analysis (included lifting in shifted position) are
shown below :
Displacements given are relative displacements with regard to the extremities of span
(mm).
Span Deflection Load

Location Member Properties d/l
(l) Relative (d) Case
W66-W16 12000 W21 x 62 0.21 NLP0 1/31428
KO DRUM W21 x 62
W65-W10 6600 0.35 NPL0 1/18857
W20-W67 6600 W21 x 62 0.58 NPL0 1/11379

All deflections are acceptable, which are less than 1/360 for main beam and 1/300 for other beam
(for cantilever “l” design value is twice the cantilever length).
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 11 of 31
3 DESIGN PREMISES
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

The present analysis is carried out based on the design criteria described in the following documents
1) Document no. Design of Offshore Topside Structure
2) Document no. MTO -Structural
3) Document no. Equipment List
4) Drawings References:
a. KO DRUM Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
b. KO DRUM Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
1.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1) Document No. Structural Design Basis
2) Document No. Platforms Weight Control Report
1.1.2 Company General Specification

3) Document No. Weight Monitoring and Weighing Offshore Units, Rev. 02.
4) Document No. Design of Offshore Topsides Structures, Rev. 02.
5) Document No. Material for Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 01.
6) Document No. Fabrication of Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 02.
7) Document No. Load-out, Sea-Fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore Structures,
Rev.01.
1.1.3 Codes and Standards

8) API RP2A-WSD. 21st Edition, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Construction
Fixed Offshore Platforms – 2000.
9) AISC 9th Edition/ASD, American Institute of Steel Construction/Allowable Stress Design – 1989.
3.2 MATERIAL
All structures will be made of steel, using the following properties:
Steel density : 7.850 t/m3
Elastic modulus : 205000 MPa
Poisson's ratio : 0.3
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 12 of 31
Steel grades are per basic engineering drawings with the following corresponding yield stresses:
for grade S355 Fy = 355 MPa thk  16 mm
Fy = 345 MPa 16 mm < thk  40 mm
Fy = 335 MPa 40 mm < thk
for grade S235 Fy = 235 MPa thk  16 mm
Fy = 225 MPa 16 mm < thk  40 mm
Fy = 215 MPa 40 mm < thk
Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

See hereunder the steel category specification and yield stress.
SPECIAL CATEGORY FIRST CATEGORY SECOND CATEGORY
S 1 2
Piles S355 Tubular OD < 12” S235

Tubular S235
Deck leg S355 Tubular OD > 12” S355
WPG S355 WPG S235

(Web height > 600mm) (*) (Web height > 600mm) (*)
Rolled section S235

Padeyes S355 Rolled section S235
(Web height < 600mm) (*)
Plates S355 Plates S235 Plates S235

(*) Welded plate girder shall be preferred for web height is superior to 600mm, else rolled section
shall be used.
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM

The following software will be used for modelling and designing of structures :
 SACS version 5.1.
This software is developed and produced by EDI (Engineering Dynamics Inc.)
The analysis uses the following co-ordinates :
X : Plant east Y : Plant north Z : Vertical up
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM

The following unit system shall be adopted in the SACS analysis files and design documents:
- Great length : in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)
- Small length : in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)
- Forces and moments : in kN or kNm
- Masses : in kg or metric tons
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 13 of 31
- Stresses : in kN/cm2
- Angles : in degree
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 14 of 31
4 COMPUTER MODEL
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
4.1.1 General
The lifting analysis to be carried out are classical static linear analysis of a three dimensional space
frame computer model comprising the Adjacent Wellhead main structure.
Each loading case, an equivalent linear stiffness matrix simulating the behaviour of the structure
automatically computed by the software before the structural analysis of the whole frame proceeds.
The lift arrangement is based on a hook position above the deck CoG and such that the minimum
sling angle with the horizontal is 60° (+/-) 5°.
In addition to the nominal CoG position, 2 extreme positions of the CoG are investigated in a
variation along X ans 2 other positions in a variation along Y, which are equal to 10% of the Adjacent
Wellhead dimensions, but not less than within a 2.0 m.
Member stress checking and joint check are performed according to API RP2A – WSD 21 st edition
4.1.2 Allowable Stress

Code checking is done using basic allowable stresses
4.1.3 Contingency Factor
4.1.3.1 Provisions
Gravity loads :
- equipment dry weights,
- piping dry weight,
- structural dead weight,
- Instrumentation & Electrical bulk,
- live loads,
are calculated based upon the Loading Diagrams, Equipment List and also taking into account the
latest up-dated equipment weight including the following provision:
10 % provision on equipment dry weight is accounted for supporting structure accesses &
walkways,
15 % provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,
5% provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,
5% provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 15 of 31
4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

Contingencies are covered by applying where appropriate in the load combinations the following
contingency factors.
15 % on main structural weight,
15 % on secondary structural weight,
25 % on mechanical weight,
20 % on dry piping weight,
25 % on bulk electrical weight,
25 % on bulk instrumentation weight,
25 % on itemised electrical weight,
25 % on itemised instrumentation weight,
25 % for safety items,
0% on environmental loads,
0% on live loads.
The weight contingency factor as specified above are applied on “dry weight plus provision”.
4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

The dynamic amplification factor is 1.30 for lifted weight less than 100 tonnes.
4.1.5 Consequence Factor

A consequence factor of 1.35 is applied for the code checking of any member attached to lifting
points, as well as joints to which these members are connected for punching shear verification.
A consequence factor of 1.15 is applied for the other members and joints.
4.1.6 Skew Effect

The skew effect is applied to take into account shortening or stretching of slings. The load is factored
by 1.33 as a skew load factored (SKL) for flexible object (module) as per GS-STR-401 Section
6.2.2.5 skew load distribution for Single Hook Lifts and 1.15 skew load factored for lifting using
spreader bar
4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

Adjacent Wellhead is lifted with 4-off slings from a single hook point to padeyes, however Adjacent
Bridge is lifted with 2 slings from a single hook point to spreader bar and 4-off sling from spreader
bar to padeye on main deck. The hook point is managed to locate above the centre of gravity of
structure. The slings are modeled by tubular 3”ODX1.25”WT with a Young’s modulus of 100000
Mpa, in order to take into account slings stiffness for analysis. The minimum angle for the all slings is
60 (+/-) 5 degree. The slings arrangement is shown below.
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 16 of 31
4.1.8 CoG Variation

The effect of the variation of the position of the centre of gravity is investigated. The 4-off positions
are investigated in a variation along X and Y equal to 10% of the structure dimensions, but not less
than within a 2.0 m. The minimum 2.0 m CoG variations along X and Y to be used for this lifting
analysis.
CoG positions are given in the table :
Wellhead
CoG shifts Longitudinal Transversal
X (m) Y (m)
Deck dimension
12 5
Shift +/- (%)
5% 5%
Shifts +/- (m)
0.5 < 1.00 0.25 < 1.00
Shifts to be used 1.00
1.00
COG THEORITICAL POSITION
CoG Original 0.73 0.78
COG SHIFTED POSITIONS
CoG 1 (-,-) -0.27 -0.22
CoG 2 (+,-)
CoG 3 (-,+)
CoG 4 (+,+)
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 17 of 31
The sketch showing the variation of CoG are shown in figure below :
3 4
Platform
North
CoG
3 4
1 2
1 2
CoG shifted (4 Location)

2 m x 2 m Box
The shifts of centre of gravity are obtained by applying dummy forces with zero resultant at four
joints. Dummy forces calculations are presented in Section 5.2 CoG Shift Force Calculation.
The loaded joints at Adjacent Wellhead are node W10, W20, W65 and W67. Those loaded joints are
located at pile heads of the structures.
This is illustrated by figure below :
Adjacent Wellhead – SHIFT X

DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 18 of 31
Adjacent Wellhead – SHIFT Y
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL

The computer structural model plot are shown in the Appendix B.
4.2.1 General View

The following plot shows the general model of the Adjacent Wellhead
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 19 of 31
4.2.2 Description
The different elements included in the structural model are defined here below:
- Structural part
Primary and secondary structures together with flooring (including the deck plating, grating, handrail,
stringers and joists) are in the structural section. Only the main structure is modelled in this report,
the other structural components will be input as uniform member load or joint load.
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM

Nodes of the structural model are described in a global axis system defined as follows:
- The origin of the global axis system is taken at the Chart Datum/LAT and comes up to the centre
of the main deck legs.
- Z is vertical from the Chart Datum/LAT
- Y is horizontal parallel to the platform north
- X is horizontal parallel to the platform east
4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM

Each member of the structural model has its own local axis system in which calculated internal
forces and moments are expressed. It can also be used to introduce loads on the members.
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
4.5.1 Hook Point

The hook point is modelled using 1-off node, as explained in section 4.1.6 Skew Effect. Basically,
this node is fixed for the 6 degrees of freedom.
4.5.2 Slings
All slings are released in local moment Y and Z at hook end point an in moment X, Y, and Z at the
other end, to present the shear force and moment generation.
4.5.3 Model Global Stability

To avoid the numerical instability, joint W04B of Adjacent Wellhead is fixed in horizontal X and Y-axis
displacement, however, joints W01D of Adjacent Wellhead is fixed in horizontal X-axis displacement.
Hook point is fixed in 6 degree of freedom. See figure below.
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 20 of 31
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 21 of 31
5 LOADING
The loading diagram shown in the Appendix A has been used to establish the loading.
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION

Elementary loads to be considered are summarised in the table below. Description of each loading
type is detailed thereafter.
Loading
Discipline of loads Description
Structure name
1 Structural Self Weight
Structural
2 Structural Appurtenance
Adjacent Wellhead Equipment 4 Piping Dry Weight

7 Equipment Dry Weight
Balancing Forces (couple) +X Enforce loads along X direction

+Y Enforce loads along Y direction
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION

Adjacent Wellhead Platform
The CoG shift forces are applied at the joints connecting slings to boat landing. Those forces allow
for enforced shifting of CoG.
The load ‘+X’ causes the shift of the CoG along X :
2 x F+x x Lx = Fz x Δx
F+x = (Fz x Δx) / (2 x Lx)
F+x = (679.908x 1.00) / (2 x 12) = 28.33kN
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 22 of 31
These load are applied at :

Node W04B -28.439 kN
Node W02D -28.439 kN
Node W03B 28.439 kN
Node W01D 28.439 kN
The load ‘+Y’ causes the shift of the CoG along Y:
2 x F+y x Ly = Fz x Δy
F+y = (Fz x Δy) / (2 x Ly)
F+y = (224.576 x 1.00) / (2 x 6.60) = 18.528 kN
These load are applied at :

Node W02D 18.528 kN
Node W01D 18.528 kN
This is illustrated by figure below :
Load Condition +X Enforce Loads along X Direction

DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 23 of 31
Load Condition +Y Enforce Loads along Y Direction
The resultants of these forces are equal to zero in order to keep the same weight of the boat landing.
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS
5.3.1 Pre-loading Combination

Prior to make a load combination, the pre-loading combination is required to easier to make load
combination.
The pre-loading combination definition are shown below:
Load Label Description
WGHT Lift weight with contingencies
DAF Lift weight with contingencies and dynamic amplification factor
NLP Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.35 consequence factor
FLP Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.15 consequence factor
The pre-loading combination factor are shown in the table below:

Loading Description WGHT
1 Structural Self Weight 1.2075
2 Structural Appurtunances 1.2075
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 24 of 31
Loading DAF
WGHT 1.30
Loading PAD NPAD

DAF 1.350 1.150
The loading combination for CSF (common solution file) module will be explained below:
The loading definition:
Loading Type Definition
Loading 0 Origin position with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 1 Shift 1 with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 2 Shift 2 with 1.33 skew load factor
The final result will be a combination of all shifted condition and origin position both for 1.15
consequence factor, 1.35 consequence factor and no consequence factor.
5.3.2 Loading Combination without Consequence Factor

The load factors to be used in the load combination are as follows:
Adjacent Wellhead module
Loading LPA0 LPA1 LPA2 LPA3 LPA4

DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.330 1.330 -1.330 -1.330
+Y 1.330 -1.330 -1.330 1.330
5.3.3 Loading Combination for Member Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 25 of 31
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor have 1.35 and skew
effect
Loading NLP0 NLP1 NLP2 NLP3 NLP4
DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.7955 1.7955 -1.7955 -1.7955
+Y 1.7955 -1.7955 -1.7955 1.7955
5.3.4 Loading Combination for Member not Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor of 1.15 and skew effect
Loading FLP0 FLP1 FLP2 FLP3 FLP4
DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.5295 1.5295 -1.5295 -1.5295
+Y 1.5295 -1.5295 -1.5295 1.5295
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 26 of 31
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY
6.1.1 Elementary Load

****** SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY ******
RELATIVE TO STRUCTURAL ORIGIN
LOAD LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY MZ DEAD LOAD BUOYANCY
CASE LABEL
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN) (KN)
1 1 0.000 0.000 -99.423 69.900 0.855 0.000 99.423 0.000

2 2 0.000 0.000 -30.820 37.056 1.485 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 4 0.000 0.000 -14.410 25.907 0.582 0.000 0.000 0.000
4 7 0.000 0.000 -7.999 17.997 8.598 0.000 0.000 0.000
5 +X 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 -244.575 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 +Y 0.000 0.000 0.000 244.570 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Didapar dari saclst cog 1, keyword : basic load
6.1.2 Pre-Loadings and Loading Combination

G0 – Position
***** SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *****
LOAD LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
CASE LABEL
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN-M)
11 FLP0 0.000 0.000 -374.063 377.158 30.808 0.000
12 NLP0 0.000 0.000 -439.117 442.750 36.165 0.000
13 LPA0 0.000 0.000 -325.272 327.963 26.789 0.000
Dari pstlst.all , keyword : combined
G1 – Position
CASE LABEL
11 FLP1 0.000 0.000 -374.063 751.227 -343.270 0.000

12 NLP1 0.000 0.000 -439.117 881.875 -402.969 0.000
13 LPA1 0.000 0.000 -325.272 653.241 -298.496 0.000
G2 – Position
CASE LABEL
11 FLP2 0.000 0.000 -374.063 3.089 -343.270 0.000
12 NLP2 0.000 0.000 -439.117 3.626 -402.969 0.000
13 LPA2 0.000 0.000 -325.272 2.686 -298.496 0.000
G3 – Position
CASE LABEL
11 FLP3 0.000 0.000 -374.063 3.089 404.885 0.000
12 NLP3 0.000 0.000 -439.117 3.626 475.300 0.000
13 LPA3 0.000 0.000 -325.272 2.686 352.074 0.000
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 27 of 31
G4 – Position
CASE LABEL
11 FLP4 0.000 0.000 -374.063 751.227 404.885 0.000

12 NLP4 0.000 0.000 -439.117 881.875 475.300 0.000
13 LPA4 0.000 0.000 -325.272 653.241 352.074 0.000
6.1.3 Loading Summary and CoG

G0 – Position
************* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *************
LOAD LOAD ********* X - DIRECTION ********* ********* Y - DIRECTION ********* ********* Z - DIRECTION *********
CASE LABEL FORCE X Y Z FORCE X Y Z FORCE X Y Z
(KN) (M) (M) (M) (KN) (M) (M) (M) (KN) (M) (M) (M)
1 1 0.00 0.00 -195.73 0.36 0.81 5.35

2 2 0.00 0.00 -93.58 1.03 1.06 4.78
3 4 0.00 0.00 -78.51 1.07 1.30 5.11
4 7 0.00 0.00 -179.64 0.76 0.36 4.79
5 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
6 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -705.43 0.72 0.77 5.02
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -917.06 0.72 0.77 5.02
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1238.03 0.72 0.77 5.02
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1054.62 0.72 0.77 5.02
11 FLP0 0.00 0.00 -1402.64 0.72 0.77 5.02
12 NLP0 0.00 0.00 -1646.58 0.72 0.77 5.02
13 LPA0 0.00 0.00 -1219.69 0.72 0.77 5.02
Pada saclst cogo, keyword relative
G1 – Position

1 1 0.00 0.00 -195.68 0.31 0.76 5.34

2 2 0.00 0.00 -93.58 1.03 1.06 4.78
3 4 0.00 0.00 -78.51 1.07 1.30 5.11
4 7 0.00 0.00 -179.64 0.76 0.36 4.79
5 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
6 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -705.38 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -916.99 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1237.94 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1054.54 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
11 FLP1 0.00 0.00 -1402.54 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
12 NLP1 0.00 0.00 -1646.46 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
13 LPA1 0.00 0.00 -1219.60 -0.26 -0.21 5.02
Pada saclst cog1, keyword relative

Harga x y z harus sama dengan xyz rencana
G2 – Position
1 1 0.00 0.00 -195.80 0.40 0.76 5.35

2 2 0.00 0.00 -93.58 1.03 1.06 4.78
3 4 0.00 0.00 -78.51 1.07 1.30 5.11
4 7 0.00 0.00 -179.64 0.76 0.36 4.79
5 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
6 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -705.52 1.69 -0.21 5.02
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -917.17 1.69 -0.21 5.02
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1238.19 1.69 -0.21 5.02
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1054.75 1.69 -0.21 5.02
11 FLP2 0.00 0.00 -1402.82 1.69 -0.21 5.02
12 NLP2 0.00 0.00 -1646.79 1.69 -0.21 5.02
13 LPA2 0.00 0.00 -1219.84 1.69 -0.21 5.02
G3 – Position
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 28 of 31

1 1 0.00 0.00 -99.42 0.01 -0.70 5.77

2 2 0.00 0.00 -30.82 0.05 -1.20 4.80
3 4 0.00 0.00 -14.41 0.04 -1.80 4.89
4 7 0.00 0.00 -8.00 1.07 -2.25 4.76
5 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
6 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -188.13 0.08 -1.01 5.43
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -244.57 1.08 -0.01 5.43
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -330.16 1.08 -0.01 5.43
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -281.25 1.08 -0.01 5.43
11 FLP3 0.00 0.00 -374.06 1.08 -0.01 5.43
12 NLP3 0.00 0.00 -439.12 1.08 -0.01 5.43
13 LPA3 0.00 0.00 -325.27 1.08 -0.01 5.43
G4 – Position
1 1 0.00 0.00 -99.42 0.01 -0.70 5.77

2 2 0.00 0.00 -30.82 0.05 -1.20 4.80
3 4 0.00 0.00 -14.41 0.04 -1.80 4.89
4 7 0.00 0.00 -8.00 1.07 -2.25 4.76
5 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
6 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.02
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -188.13 0.08 -1.01 5.43
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -244.57 1.08 -2.01 5.43
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -330.16 1.08 -2.01 5.43
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -281.25 1.08 -2.01 5.43
11 FLP4 0.00 0.00 -374.06 1.08 -2.01 5.43
12 NLP4 0.00 0.00 -439.12 1.08 -2.01 5.43
13 LPA4 0.00 0.00 -325.27 1.08 -2.01 5.43
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS

See Appendix C – Deflection Output Plots
6.3 SLINGS LOAD
Ambil di pstlst.lpa, keyword : member forces

SACS-IV SYSTEM MEMBER FORCES AND MOMENTS
******************** KN ********************* ******************* KN-M ********************

MEMBER MEMBER GROUP LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
NUMBER END ID CASE
W10-C00C W10 P3 LPA0 94.7185 0.0000 1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

LPA1 149.2814 0.0000 1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 110.4744 0.0000 1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 40.1556 0.0000 1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 78.9631 0.0000 1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
C00C
LPA0 102.8731 0.0000 -1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA1 157.4359 0.0000 -1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 118.6289 0.0000 -1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 48.3102 0.0000 -1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 87.1177 0.0000 -1.1382 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
W20-C00C W20 P3 LPA0 105.5823 0.0000 1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

LPA1 98.0966 0.0000 1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 42.9210 0.0000 1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 113.0684 0.0000 1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 168.2435 0.0000 1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
C00C LPA0 113.7368 0.0000 -1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA1 106.2512 0.0000 -1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 51.0756 0.0000 -1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 121.2229 0.0000 -1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 176.3980 0.0000 -1.0992 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 29 of 31
SACS-IV SYSTEM MEMBER FORCES AND MOMENTS
******************** KN ********************* ******************* KN-M ********************

MEMBER MEMBER GROUP LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
NUMBER END ID CASE
W65-C00C W65 P3 LPA0 53.4340 0.0000 1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

LPA1 71.9178 0.0000 1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 112.5141 0.0000 1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 34.9507 0.0000 1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 -5.6461 0.0000 1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
C00C LPA0 61.5886 0.0000 -1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA1 80.0724 0.0000 -1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 120.6686 0.0000 -1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 43.1052 0.0000 -1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 2.5084 0.0000 -1.7280 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
W67-C00C W67 P3 LPA0 54.4233 0.0000 1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

LPA1 -13.1380 0.0000 1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 44.5938 0.0000 1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 121.9844 0.0000 1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 64.2532 0.0000 1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
C00C LPA0 62.5778 0.0000 -1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA1 -4.9834 0.0000 -1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA2 52.7483 0.0000 -1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA3 130.1390 0.0000 -1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
LPA4 72.4078 0.0000 -1.7026 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS
6.4.1 Member Connected to Padeye

Di pstlst.nlp
SACS IV - * * * M E M B E R G R O U P S U M M A R Y * * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
MAX. DIST EFFECTIVE CM

GRUP CRITICAL LOAD UNITY FROM * APPLIED STRESSES * *** ALLOWABLE STRESSES *** CRIT LENGTHS * VALUES *
ID MEMBER COND CHECK END AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z AXIAL EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z COND KLY KLZ Y Z
M N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 M M
21 W15- W16 NLP2 0.28 0.5 5.41 30.44 7.74 141.002676.95 155.10 176.25 TN+BN 4.3 0.5 0.85 0.85
31 W18- W21 NLP1 0.06 0.0 -0.32 -2.68 -7.60 132.761669.54 155.10 176.25 C<.15 2.1 0.4 0.85 0.85
61 W60- W61 NLP4 0.13 2.1 -1.70 17.01 -1.61 117.73 340.26 155.10 176.25 C<.15 2.1 2.1 0.85 0.85
JB1 W04B- W10 NLP3 0.04 1.0 -1.84 5.97 6.00 204.72******* 258.75 258.75 C<.15 1.0 1.0 0.85 0.85
6.4.2 Member Not Connected to Padeye
Di pstlst.flp
SACS IV - * * * M E M B E R G R O U P S U M M A R Y * * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
MAX. DIST EFFECTIVE CM
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD UNITY FROM * APPLIED STRESSES * *** ALLOWABLE STRESSES *** CRIT LENGTHS * VALUES *
ID MEMBER COND CHECK END AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z AXIAL EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z COND KLY KLZ Y Z
M N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 M M
21 W15- W16 FLP2 0.24 0.5 4.61 25.93 6.60 141.002676.95 155.10 176.25 TN+BN 4.3 0.5 0.85 0.85
31 W18- W21 FLP1 0.05 0.0 -0.28 -2.29 -6.47 132.761669.54 155.10 176.25 C<.15 2.1 0.4 0.85 0.85
61 W60- W61 FLP4 0.11 2.1 -1.45 14.49 -1.37 117.73 340.26 155.10 176.25 C<.15 2.1 2.1 0.85 0.85
JB1 W04B- W10 FLP3 0.04 1.0 -1.57 5.08 5.11 204.72******* 258.75 258.75 C<.15 1.0 1.0 0.85 0.85
6.5 REACTION
Reaction force without consequence factor

Dari pstlst.LPA
SACS-IV SYSTEM REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

JOINT LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
NUMBER CASE
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 30 of 31
W12 LPA0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 -23.874 -22.022 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 -7.625 26.190 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 25.836 25.683 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 9.587 -22.528 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W12 LPA0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 25.167 22.022 325.259 -50.530 11.257 -0.008
LPA2 25.227 -26.190 325.259 -0.241 10.506 -0.004
LPA3 -26.275 -25.683 325.259 6.069 1.171 -0.002
LPA4 -26.336 22.528 325.259 -44.220 1.922 -0.006
W12 LPA0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 -1.293 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 -17.603 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.439 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 16.749 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
C00C LPA0 -0.554 -1.831 325.258 -22.231 6.214 -0.005

LPA1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W01D LPA0 -0.427 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W04B LPA0 0.981 1.831 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SACS-IV SYSTEM REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS SUMMARY
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
CASE
LPA0 0.000 0.000 325.258
LPA1 0.000 0.000 325.259
LPA2 0.000 0.000 325.259
LPA3 0.000 0.000 325.259
LPA4 0.000 0.000 325.259
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.15

Dari pstlst.flp
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

NUMBER CASE
W12 FLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 -27.455 -25.325 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 -8.768 30.118 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 29.712 29.535 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 11.025 -25.908 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W12 FLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 28.942 25.325 374.048 -58.110 12.946 -0.009
FLP2 29.011 -30.118 374.048 -0.278 12.081 -0.004
FLP3 -30.216 -29.535 374.048 6.979 1.347 -0.002
FLP4 -30.286 25.908 374.048 -50.853 2.211 -0.007
W12 FLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 -1.487 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 -20.243 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 0.504 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 19.261 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
C00C FLP0 -0.637 -2.105 374.048 -25.566 7.146 -0.006

FLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W01D FLP0 -0.491 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W04B FLP0 1.128 2.105 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
DATE: 08/08/05

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 31 of 31
FLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

CASE
FLP0 0.000 0.000 374.048
FLP1 0.000 0.000 374.048
FLP2 0.000 0.000 374.048
FLP3 0.000 0.000 374.048
FLP4 0.000 0.000 374.048
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.35

Dari pstlst.nlp
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

NUMBER CASE
W12 NLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 -32.230 -29.729 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 -10.293 35.356 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 34.879 34.672 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 12.942 -30.414 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W12 NLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 33.975 29.729 439.100 -68.216 15.197 -0.011
NLP2 34.057 -35.356 439.100 -0.326 14.183 -0.005
NLP3 -35.471 -34.672 439.100 8.193 1.581 -0.002
NLP4 -35.553 30.414 439.100 -59.697 2.595 -0.008
W12 NLP0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 -1.745 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 -23.763 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.592 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 22.611 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
C00C NLP0 -0.748 -2.471 439.101 -30.012 8.389 -0.007

NLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W01D NLP0 -0.576 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
W04B NLP0 1.325 2.471 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

CASE
NLP0 0.000 0.000 439.101
NLP1 0.000 0.000 439.100
NLP2 0.000 0.000 439.100
NLP3 0.000 0.000 439.100
NLP4 0.000 0.000 439.100
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS
Since no tubular intersection is found during lifting analysis, joint can analysis is not
performed in this calculation.

Lifting Analysis Report - Rev B

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Lifting Analysis Report - Rev B

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

KO DRUM PLATFORM

A 20/05/05 ANA ISSUED FOR CLIENT

STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN

CLASS REVISION STATUS

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

APPENDIX A PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION

APPENDIX B STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY

APPENDIX C JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS

APPENDIX D UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS

APPENDIX E SACS INPUT FILE

APPENDIX F SACS OUTPUT FILE

Appendix F1 Maximum Joint Deflection List

Appendix F2 Member Unity Check Summary

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

APPENDIX G REFERENCES DRAWING

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY

2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Maximum stress ratios obtained for members are :

Members not connected to padeye :

2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION

Span Deflection Load

W20-W67 6600 W21 x 62 0.58 NPL0 1/11379

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1.1.2 Company General Specification

1.1.3 Codes and Standards

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

Piles S355 Tubular OD < 12” S235

WPG S355 WPG S235

Rolled section S235

Plates S355 Plates S235 Plates S235

3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM

3.4 UNIT SYSTEM

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

4.1.2 Allowable Stress

4.1.3 Contingency Factor

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

4.1.5 Consequence Factor

4.1.6 Skew Effect

4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

KO DRUM PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1.8 CoG Variation

* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *

* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *

********** KN * * KN-M ************

********** KN * * KN-M ************