Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ISSUES
WON there was a valid complaint against the appellant – YES, the
complaint only alleged one offense because the affidavit attached therewith
cured the ambiguity on number of offenses.
Appellant contends the complaint is void because it charges at least 3 crimes
of rape: that committed “on or about the month of June, 1978”, “sometime
prior to said period”, “subsequent thereto”.
Court: No merit.
Sec 10, Rule 110 – not necessary that the complaint or information indicate
the precise time the crime was committed unless it was a material ingredient
to the offense.