Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sebastian Smith, aged 12, is a year 7 student who has been diagnosed with Dysgraphia and also
exhibits signs of anxiety and inappropriate behaviour. Often generalised as a writing disability, dysgraphia is
a neurological disorder that affects the information and motor processing skills of an individual (Nicolson
and Fawcett, 2011). It compromises a learner’s ability to execute manual production of letters resulting in
significant impairment of writing legibility and speed when compared to students of the same age (Prunty &
Barnett, 2017). As per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-V], writing
disorders like dysgraphia are prevalent in 5-15% of the school-children worldwide (American Psychiatric
Association, 2013).
Sebastian’s strengths include his ability to work with technology. He enjoys doing online research-
based tasks. He types twice as fast as he writes and demonstrates this in class while working on his laptop.
Sebastian is exceptionally imaginative and creative with building things, and enthusiastically participates in
practical activities in class. When involved in practical tasks, he exhibits a good eye for detail and works
well independently. He has a strong narrative memory and also excels in verbal reasoning. He demonstrates
this by actively participating in class discussions and oral class-based informal assessments. During such
tasks, he sincerely engages with his peers and displays a positive attitude towards learning.
For school-going children across the world, hand-writing is considered as the utmost important
mode of communication of learning (Prunty & Barnett, 2017). Although Sebastian exhibits high verbal
intellectual abilities as compared to his peers, he experiences significant inconsistencies in handwriting. This
is characterised by omissions/repetitions of letters and strokes, odd spaces between words and letters (van
Dun, Vandenborre & Marien, 2016), poor spellings, grammar, punctuation and run on sentences (Dohla &
1
Heim, 2015). Sebastian struggles to hold the pen/pencil for longer writing durations as it results in extreme
pain in his fingers (van Dun et al., 2016). He also experiences difficulties in organizing his thoughts and
putting them on paper (Dohla & Heim, 2015). His disability presents him with huge difficulties in
communicating his understanding through writing and thus results in increased levels of frustration and low
self-esteem (Coker & Kim, 2017). His slow writing speed, poor thought organisational skills and inability to
finish the tasks like others in the class, despite knowing the content, also results in heightened anxiety levels
(Thakkar et al., 2016). The avoidance of failure is the underlying cause of his inappropriate behaviour in
majority of his classes where he shows reluctance to attempt or complete the tasks that involves writing
(Albert, 2003). The inability to perform like his peers also impacts his social-emotional wellbeing, which is
evident through his limited social interaction (Loreman, Deppeler & Harvey, 2011). Students like Sebastian
form a significant part of the mainstream education system (Vitelli, 2015; NSW Department of Education
and Communities, 2012). Therefore, it is imperative for the teachers to adopt inclusive instructional designs
that are relevant, accessible and allow meaningful learning in all students.
Universal design of learning [UDL] is a framework of principles that facilitates inclusion by making
the curriculum accessible to all students, regardless of their diverse backgrounds, learning needs or
disabilities (Vitelli, 2015). It focusses on incorporating flexible learning with respect to goals, methods,
instructions, resources and assessments for addressing “linguistic, cultural and cognitive variability” in
learners (Hall, Meyer & Rose, 2012, p.4). UDL stems from the fine amalgamation of research in the fields
of neural networks involved in learning (recognition, strategic and affective) and quality teaching practice
(Meyer, Rose & Gordon, 2014). These neural networks form the basis of the principles of UDL that provide
students with – multiple means of representation [MMR], multiple means of action and expression [MMAE]
and multiple means of engagement [MME] (Meyer et al., 2014). By providing equitable opportunities for all
students to learn in meaningful ways, UDL fosters improved educational outcomes for students with/without
disabilities (Vitelli, 2015). Apart from supporting students, it also allows teachers to develop a deeper and
more accurate understanding of their students learning, align teaching practice to suit individual needs and
thus, unveil hidden competencies to boost classroom performance (Loreman et al., 2011).
2
The principle of MMR focusses on the diverse ways in which information can be presented to the
learners and thus addresses learners’ variability in recognition network (Hall et al., 2012). By utlising
different ways of presenting content, it expands a learner’s processing skills to perceive, interpret and
understand information (Meyer et al., 2014). These may include the use of textbooks, highlights,
worksheets, PowerPoints, videos (with captions), podcasts, google docs, pictures, graphic organisers (mind
maps, venn diagrams, tables, lists), symbols, diagrams, models, simulations, digital pens, audio-books,
scaffolds and demonstrations (McDermott & Hand, 2013; Ryan, 2012). The use of differentiated instructions
along with MMR also enhances the learning outcomes in students by allowing them to analyse relationships
and ideas and thus construct deeper conceptual-understanding (Westwood, 2001). In case of Sebastian,
different modes of representation may enhance his engagement in classroom activities, thereby supporting
his reasoning ability (Eliam & Poyas, 2008). These may also assist him to engage more, organise his
thoughts, encourage handwriting to reduce anxiety and frustration, and thus improve his academic and
emotional wellbeing (Paquette, 2007). Presentation of information using different media may also enhance
his creative and contextual understanding, thus promoting a positive attitude towards learning (Paquette,
2007).
The adjusted lesson plan incorporates MMR through use of a range of learning activities and
universal resources to make learning broadly accessible for all students (Loreman et al., 2011). In the
beginning of the lesson it focusses on the students’ aural as well as visual processing skills by delivering the
learning goals and expectations, both verbally and as text. Explicitly defining the learning goals and
expectations can allow all students including Sebastian to organise their thoughts around the content,
anticipate their learning needs, track their progress and thus reduce anxiousness (Department of Education
and Training, 2017). The lesson plan further allows students to reflect on their prior knowledge by
facilitating discussion using strategic open-ended questions and pictures. This assists aural, verbal as well as
visual learners to comprehend the information in a better way (Hall et al., 2012). Use of graphic organisers
like mind map is done to clarify concepts and build upon students’ existing knowledge-base for a
3
meaningful learning experience (Dexter & Hughes, 2011). To reinforce the relevance of the content to a
broader audience, the lesson provides choice to students to either watch a video, read a script or research the
internet on Aboriginal water values. Allowing students to choose from multiple representations of same
information not only encourages them to expand their recognition networks, but also facilitates better
perception and comprehension for enhanced learning outcomes (Meyer et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2012).
MMAE focus on the differentiated ways in which learners can demonstrate their understanding. By
providing the learners with a range of options and avenues to express their knowledge, this principle
supports the strategic neural network in learners (Hall et al., 2012). It allows learners, like Sebastian, to use
varied options with respect to respond methods and “access to variety of tools and assistive technology” for
construction and composition of communication (Meyer et al., 2014, p. 103). Research suggests that
learning can be demonstrated through various ways such as handwritten notes, oral presentations,
Powerpoint presentations, discussions, videography, audio recordings, charts, graphs, drawings, model
construction, practical tasks, typed notes on computer or use of word processor (McDermott & Hand, 2013;
Jewitt, 2008). Studies suggest that by providing alternative means to students like Sebastian, MMAE allow
them to achieve competence, develop engagement with learning, self-efficacy and self-awareness for
The lesson plan emphasises on this aspect of UDL by providing multiple options to students to
comprehend the instructions/content and demonstrate their understanding in varied ways. For instance, the
students are given choice to handwrite or type the lesson goals. As Sebastian types faster than he writes, this
can engage him at the beginning of the lesson with something that he can easily accomplish and further
motivate him to achieve more (García & De Caso, 2004). The lesson then encourages students to think and
communicate orally/through texts (handwritten/typed on google docs) to share their existing knowledge.
This will also assist Sebastian to share his reasoning ability with others in the class and promote sense of
social interaction (Loreman et al., 2011). The provision of sentence starters is also suggested as a strategy
for students with writing disabilities to encourage thought formation and enable short bursts of handwriting
4
exercises (Dohla & Heim, 2015). Exit slips at the end of the lesson are also incorporated to practice
handwriting as a mode of communication (Dohla & Heim, 2015). Students are also provided with flexible
options to either write, draw, take photo or use software to construct a mind-map, to organise the discussed
information. This enables all students, including Sebastian, to utilise their interests, imagination and
creativity to organise their thoughts and enhance their learning (CAST, 2011). To assist students like
Sebastian, who have difficulties in writing, the use of assistive technology like, touch typing, speech
recognition software/ speech to text tools (Google’s voice typing, Apple’s Speak screens or dragon
dictation) is incorporated (Garrett et al., 2011). By eliminating extensive typing such softwares reduce the
MME, the third principle of UDL supports the affective neural network by looking into strategies
that stimulate interests and motivation of a learner (Meyer et al., 2014). By providing different ways to
engage, it allows learners to self-construct their knowledge, sustain effort and persistence, and develop
ability to self-regulate (Hall et al., 2012). It is suggested that this can be accomplished using students’ prior
knowledge base to construct new concepts, using real life scenarios/examples to establish connection,
providing options/choice to learn and demonstrate their learning, collaborative work, staging the activities,
using ICT and giving timely feedback (Nwachukwu, 2017; Davis, Summers & Miller, 2012; Loreman et al.,
2011). Studies suggest that in students like Sebastian, incorporation of activities involving ICT, discussions,
online research and things that suit their interest, enable teachers to acknowledge students’ strengths,
establish the feeling of achievement in students and thus promote self-efficacy (Davis et al., 2012).
Engagement in collaborative work is also suggested to increase involvement and self-esteem, reduce
anxiety, and promote metacognition and a positive attitude to learning (Loreman et al., 2011).
The adjusted lesson plan incorporates MME to promote students’ academic, behavioural and
indulge in progressive muscular relaxation for addressing their wellbeing (Moro & Vidailhet, 2010). Apart
from benefitting Sebastian by releasing muscular tension, it also targets all students by reducing their stress
5
levels, making them feel invited to the classroom, and promote a positive learning experience (Buchler,
2013). Providing students with opportunities to respond enhances engagement, resulting in positive
academic and behavioral outcomes (Harbour, Evanovich, Sweigart, & Hughes, 2015). Inclusion of a
research-based task has also been included to enhance engagement of students like Sebastian, who enjoy
online research. The questionnaire linked with the task on Aboriginal water values is also staged into parts
to allow better comprehension and allow motivation for task completion (Loreman et al., 2011).
Constructive feedback by teacher throughout the lesson also forms an indispensable tool to focus on
students’ efforts, reinforce importance of attempts, and stimulate enthusiasm for learning (Harbour et al.,
2015). Options have also been provided for students to work collaboratively. By increasing social
interaction, collaborative work can not only increase Sebastian’s self-esteem and social competence but
provide all students with a safe and a positive learning environment (Hennessey & Dionigi, 2013).
6
Part 2: Lesson plan
Evaluate & - Instruct students to reflect on the lesson goal and respond on Exit slips (with
reflect effective use of water (verbal/handwritten/typed) sentence starter)
(10 minutes) - Provide exit slips and instruct students to write 1-2 lines on “how
will they use water effectively”
7
REFERENCES
Albert, L. (2003). A teacher’s guide to cooperative discipline (2nd ed.). Minnesota, MI: AGS publishing.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2012). Student disengagement in relation to expected and
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/00313831.2011.568607
Buchler, R. K. (2013). Anxiety-Reducing Strategies in the Classroom. (Ph.D. Thesis). Retrieved from
http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/188
CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA. Retrieved from
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/principle2
Coker, D. L., & Kim, Y. S. G. (2017). Critical issues in the understanding of young elementary school
students at risk for problems in written expression: Introduction to the special series. Journal of
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/full/10.1177/0022219417708168#articleCitation
DownloadContainer
Davis, H., Summers, J. J., & Miller, L. M. (2012). An interpersonal approach to classroom management:
Strategies for improving student engagement (Classroom insights from educational psychology).
8
Department of Education and Training. (2017). High impact teaching strategies: Excellence in teaching and
https://www.education.vic.gov.au/documents/school/teachers/support/highimpactteachstrat.pdf
Dexter, D. D., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Graphic organizers and students with learning disabilities: A meta-
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/073194871103400104#articleCitationDownloadContainer
Döhla, D., & Heim, S. (2015). Developmental Dyslexia and Dysgraphia: What can We Learn from the One
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726782/
Eliam, B., & Poyas, Y. (2008). Learning with multiple representations: Extending multimedia learning
beyond the lab. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 368–378. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475207000886?via%3Dihub
García, J., & De Caso, A. (2004). Effects of a motivational intervention for improving the writing of
children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(3), 141-159. Retrieved from
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.2307/1593665
Garrett, J. T., Wolff Heller, K., Fowler, L. P., Alberto, P. A., Fredrick, L. D., O'Rourke, C. M. (2011). Using
speech recognition software to increase writing fluency for individuals with physical disabilities.
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1177/016264341102600104
9
Hall, T., Meyer, A. D., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom
practical applications (What works for special needs learners). New York: Guilford Press.
Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective
teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure: Alternative
Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 5-13. Retrieved from https://www-tandfonline-
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
Hennessey, A., & Dionigi, R. A. (2013). Implementing cooperative learning in Australian primary schools:
Generalist teachers’ perspectives. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 52-68. Retrieved from
https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/8883201
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1),
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.3102/0091732X07310586
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2011). Inclusive education: Supporting diversity in the classroom
McDermott, M., & Hand, B. (2013). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation within
writing tasks on high school students’ chemistry understanding. Instructional Science, 41(1), 217-
Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice (1st ed.).
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwsau/reader.action?docID=4603679&query=
10
Moro, E., & Vidailhet, M. (2010). Management. In A. H. V. Schapira, A.E.T. Lang & S. Fahn (Eds.).
Movement disorders 4 (5th ed.) (pp.474-488). Philadelphia: USA, Saunders, Elsevier. Retrieved from
https://bit.ly/2IxSp62
Nicolson, R. I. & Fawcett, A. J. (2011). Dyslexia, dysgraphia, procedural learning and the cerebellum.
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0010945209002615
NSW Department of Education and Communities. (2012). Every Student, Every School: Learning and
https://schoolsequella.det.nsw.edu.au/file/d98404c4-4d09-49d1-bd87-ffea7e3fd1d8/1/ESES%20-
%20Learning%20%26%20Support.pdf
Nwachukwu, B. C. (2017). Teacher recommended academic and student engagement strategies for learning
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1884226988?accountid=36155
Paquette, K. R. (2007). Encouraging primary students’ writing through children’s literature. Early
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.457.5504&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Prunty, M., & Barnett, A. L. (2017). Understanding handwriting difficulties: A comparison of children with
and without motor impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3), 205-218. Retrieved from
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02643294.2017.1376630
11
Ryan, N. (2012). Explicitly teaching multiple modes of representation in science discourse: The impact on
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/3582
Thakkar, A., Karande, S., Bala, N., Sant, H., Gogtay, N., & Sholapurwala, R. (2016). Is anxiety more
common in school students with newly diagnosed specific learning disabilities? A cross-sectional
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/docview/1756947995?accountid=36155&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Ap
rimo
van Dun, K., Vandenborre, D., & Marien, P. (2016). Cerebellum and writing. In P. Marien & M. Manto.
(Eds.), The Linguistic Cerebellum (pp. 149-198). San Diego, US: Elsevier Science & Technology
Vitelle, E. M. (2015). Universal Design for Learning: Are we teaching it to preservice general education
http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1177/0162643415618931
Westwood, P. (2001). Differentiation’ as a strategy for inclusive classroom practice: some difficulties
identified. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6(1), 5-11. Retrieved from https://www-
tandfonline-com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/19404150109546651
12