Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Three Points to Prove: #1: The death penalty is not a deterrent to crime.
#2: The death penalty is inhumane.
#3: The death penalty is not cost effective.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: # 1: The death penalty is not a deterrent of crime.
“When the smaller crimes go down--the quality of life crimes--then the murder rate goes down,” Mr. Carlisle said.
“We haven’t had the death penalty, but we have one of the lowest murder rates in the country,” he said. “The F.B.I.
statistics for 1998 showed Hawaii’s homicide rate was the fifth lowest.”
“At Michigan’s constitutional convention in 1961, the delegates heard arguments that the death penalty was not a
deterrent, that those executed were usually the poor and disadvantaged, and that innocent people had been sentenced to
death.”
“Culture and religion play a role, as well as political vagaries in each state.”
This website provides arguments against capital punishment. The author suggests the death penalty is not a
deterrent to crime. Surprisingly, the homicide rates of several different states that do not have the death penalty are
actually lower than those with the death penalty. Hawaii is one of these states. There are quotes from judges, governors,
and the prosecuting attorney from Hawaii, Peter Carlisle. Carlisle makes a reference to the Bryan Uyesugi case – where
the defendant shot seven of his co-workers at the Xerox copy machine company.
There is specific evidence against the death penalty that indicates it is not a deterrent to crime. For example, even
without the death penalty, Hawaii has the fifth lowest homicide rate in the nation. This proves, at least to some degree,
that a state without the death penalty can thrive as one of the safest states in the nation. Along these same lines of
reasoning, homicide rates in the states that do have the death penalty are still high, such as Texas and California. This
indicates that the death penalty doesn’t necessarily deter crime. To ground this in more specific data, the NY Times found
that during the last twenty years, the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 48% to 101% higher than
states without the death penalty!
Culture, religion, politics, and the overall ideologies that dominate a community influence whether the death
penalty will remain law. In more conservative states, the death penalty is more prevalent. Interestingly, at Michigan’s
constitutional convention in the 1960s, some argued that those who were executed were predominantly poor and of racial
minorities. If valid, this is concerning as it indicates corruption in the system (a system that can end life). If the death
penalty remains, more efforts must be taken to ensure the quality and fairness of the justice system through which they
will be punished.
Bonner, Raymond and Ford Fessenden. “States With No Death Penalty Share Lower Homicide Rates.” The New York
Times. The New York Times. 22 September 2000. Web. 4 Jan 2004.
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it was published in The New York Times Magazine.
Research Log #1
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM is structured to be immersive to students. It engages many who aren’t.
STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs. and inspire students to be creative
problem-solvers.
#3: To make students better prepared to work in the jobs of the future.-Change
STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
//STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs.
“The students who transferred to a STEM-focused charter school made significant gains in 2009 in their mean NCE
achievement in the areas of Language Arts, when compared to their own prior achievement from 2006”
“In all cases students attained higher achievement during their third year at a STEM charter school than during their final
year at their old school (Table 1). This difference was significant (p ≤ .05) for the students who transferred to a STEM
charter school in fall of 2006 in the areas of mathematics and language arts.”
“Comparing students’ achievement after 3 years in a STEM magnet school to their own achievement prior to the transfer
yielded no significant differences.”
Paper#2
“On average, students in T-STEM schools had higher scores for reading, mathematics and science”
“Male students in T-STEM schools performed better than male students in traditional schools. The results were similar for
female students except for science scores”
“Although on average students in T-STEM schools performed better, these differences were not statistically significant.”
Paper#2
Erdogan, Niyazi and Carol Stuessy. "Examining the Role of Inclusive STEM Schools in the College and Career Readiness of Students
in the United States: A Multi-Group Analysis on the Outcome of Student Achievement." Educational Sciences: Theory and
Practice, vol. 15, no. 6, 01 Dec. 2016, pp. 1517-1529. EBSCOhost,
search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1101328&site=ehost-live.
Research Log #2
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM
programs and inspire students to be creative problem-solvers.
“The FIRST Robotics Competition attracts more than 300,000 contestants annually”
Paper#2
“What we do know is that students from K-6 are very interested in the STEM subjects, however, as they begin junior high
school and then high school this interest declines sharply. We also know that a major percentage of girls do not pursue the
STEM subjects beyond eighth grade. Thereby impacting the STEM workforce and creating a gross disparity among
gender and ethnicity within the STEM field. This is a very serious issue and everyone needs to encourage women and
underrepresented minorities to stay with STEM.”-American Journal of Engineering Education
“The constructs that were identified as being central to this endeavor included: STEM engagement, perceived risk of
failing, self-efficacy for problem solving, self-efficacy for robotic concepts, and the intention to pursue STEM
education.”-American Journal of Engineering Education
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it is a scholarly journal article.
Research Log #3
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM
programs.
Spillane explains, “Such connections to outside STEM experts and resources gave students increased freedom and
accessibility to learn in settings beyond the traditional classroom.”
Paper#2
Spillane, Nancy K., et al. “Inclusive STEM High Schools Increase Opportunities for Underrepresented Students.” Phi Delta Kappan, vol.
97, no. 8, 01 May 2016, pp. 54-59. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric%AN=EJ1098693&site=ehost-
live.
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because both came from EBSCO and one of them is from a
scholarly journal.
Research Log #4
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
#4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it adds more to student
learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it
adds more to student learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
“Since 1964, when the first such exam was administered to 13 year-olds in 12 countries, America has lagged behind its
peers, rarely rising above the middle of the pack and doing particularly poorly in science and math. And yet over these
past five decades, that same laggard country has dominated the world of science, technology, research and innovation.”
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it came from a popular news outlet with sources.
Research Log #5
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
#4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it adds more to student
learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #5: STEM aids education from an early age.
McClure mentioned: “Research from the learning sciences has demonstrated that children benefit from contextualized, integrated
lessons,38,39 and integration often deepens understanding of relevant concepts, promotes problem-solving, and supports understanding
of how concepts are applied in the real world.”
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it came from EBSCO.
Research Log #6
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
#4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it adds more to student
learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it came from EBSCO.
Research Log #7
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
#4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it adds more to student
learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it came from EBSCO.
Research Log #8
Three Points to Prove: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
#2: STEM programs are more engaging for students than non-STEM programs and inspire
students to be creative problem-solvers.
#3: STEM programs prepare students for jobs better than non-STEM programs.
#4: Some would argue that it takes away from traditional subjects, but it adds more to student
learning than it takes away. STEM is just changing priorities.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #1: STEM has improved student grades over non-STEM schools
I am assuming that this is a reputable and reliable article because it came from EBSCO.
Research Log #5
Three Points to Prove: #1: Battery tech will make electric and hybrid cars the norm in the future.
#2: Solar power will be saved by homes and fed back into the grid to share.
#3: New batteries will make our cell phones last days making them better.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Point that this Source/Information Proves: #