Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
right of action.
42 SCRA 23 – Political Law – Definition of “State”
4. Plaintiffs (appellant) contend that Sec. 1540 of the Administrative
In January 1955, Maria Cerdeira died in Tangier, Morocco (an
Code does not include donation inter vivos and if it does, it is
international zone [foreign country] in North Africa). At the time of
unconstitutional, null and void for violating SEC. 3 of the Jones Law
her death, she was a Spanish citizen and was a resident of Tangier.
(providing that no law shall embrace more than one subject and that
She however left some personal properties (shares of stocks and
the subject should be expressed in its titles ; that the Legislature has
other intangibles) in the Philippines. The designated administrator of
no authority to tax donation inter vivos; finally, that said provision
her estate here is Antonio Campos Rueda.
violates the rule on uniformity of taxation.
In the same year, the Collector of Internal Revenue (CIR) assessed
the estate for deficiency tax amounting to about P161k. Campos 5. CIR however contends that the word 'all gifts' refer clearly to
Rueda refused to pay the assessed tax as he claimed that the estate donation inter vivos and cited the doctrine in Tuason v. Posadas.
is exempt from the payment of said taxes pursuant to section 122 of
the Tax Code which provides: Issue: Whether or not the donations should be subjected to
inheritance tax
That no tax shall be collected under this Title in respect of
intangible personal property (a) if the decedent at the time of his YES. Sec. 1540 of the Administrative Code clearly refers to those
death was a resident of a foreign country which at the time of his donation inter vivos that take effect immediately or during the
death did not impose a transfer tax or death tax of any character in lifetime of the donor, but made in consideration of the death of the
respect of intangible person property of the Philippines not residing decedent. Those donations not made in contemplation of the
in that foreign country, or (b) if the laws of the foreign country of decedent's death are not included as it would be equivalent to
which the decedent was a resident at the time of his death allow a imposing a direct tax on property and not on its transmission.
similar exemption from transfer taxes or death taxes of every
character in respect of intangible personal property owned by The phrase 'all gifts' as held in Tuason v. Posadas refers to gifts inter
citizens of the Philippines not residing in that foreign country. vivos as they are considered as advances in anticipation of
Campos Rueda was able to prove that there is reciprocity between inheritance since they are made in consideration of death.
Tangier and the Philippines.
However, the CIR still denied any tax exemption in favor of the
estate as it averred that Tangier is not a “state” as contemplated by Vidal de Roces v. Posadas
Section 22 of the Tax Code and that the Philippines does not G.R. No. 34937 March 13, 1933
recognize Tangier as a foreign country. Imperial, J.:
ISSUE:
Facts:
Whether or not the herein respondent heirs be required to pay first
the inheritance tax before the probate court may authorize the
Don Feluix Dison, before his death, made a gift inter vivos delivery of the hereditary share pertaining to each of them.
consisting of all his properties in favor of his legitimate and
only son, Luis Dison. RULING:
Plaintiff did not receive property of any kind of Don Felix No, under the provisions of the Rules of Court, together
Dison upon the death of the latter; with the provision in the tax code, the distribution of a decedent’s
The assessment of the inheritance tax payable by Luis assets may only be ordered under the following circumstances 1.
Dison included the gift made to him by his deceased When the inheritance tax, among others, is paid 2. When a sufficient
father. The same was paid under protest. bond is given to meet the payment of the inheritance tax and all
Thereafter, plaintiff sued for the recovery of the other obligations of the nature enumerated 3. When the payment of
inheritance tax paid under protest on the ground that he the said tax and all the other obligations mentioned in the Rule has
was not an heir of his father within the meaning of been provided for. None of these were present when the
Sec1540 of the Administrative Code, there being no questioned orders were issued at the case at bar. Also, the Supreme
property left for plaintiff to inherit when his father died. Court held that there is no evidence on record that would show that
the probate court ever made a serious attempt to de what the
The lower court ruled in favor of defendant Posadas.
values of the different assets the correctness of that such properties
shall be preserved for the satisfaction of those case In the third
Issue: place that main of pesos taxes were being called by the Bureau of
Inc. Revenue, the least reasonable thing that the probate court
Whether plaintiff is required to pay the inheritance tax under the should have done was to require the heirs to deposit the amount of
Administrative Code inheritance tax being claimed in a suitable institution or to authorize
the sale of non-cash assets under the court's control and
supervision.
Facts:
1. The CFI of Manila which had jurisdiction over the estate of
Margarita David, issued an order appointing appellantCarlos Moran
Sison as judicial administrator without compensation after filing a
bond. After entering into his duties as administrator, he filed an
accounting of his administration which included items as an expense
of administration the premiums he paid on his bond.
NO.