Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fall 2018
Countries like India, UK, and USA are known to use common law while code law is
applied in nations such as Germany, Spain, Japan, and Brazil. This blog discusses some
differences which exist in the legal environments of a nation implementing common law and one
which embraces code law. In terms of definition, common law is enacted dependent on court
rulings. In other words, they are results of rulings that have been made in older court cases.
According to Hill (2013), these laws are based on customs, traditions, and precedent. On the
other hand, code law refers to an organized and broad written statement of laws of a specific
region when the code was passed and codified. The other difference between common and code
law is explained by laws governing intellectual property. In USA, which uses common law,
ownership is instituted by use. On the other hand, in countries like Brazil and Germany, where
code law is implemented, some agreements may not be implemented except if suitably notarized
or registered in a country which embraces common law. Moreover, the same agreement can be
binding provided that proof of the accord can be ascertained. The last difference between the two
systems regards disparities in interpretation of sales agreements. A striking example in this case
is the case between Nike and Cidesport of Spain (Williams, 2017). Nike los its right o use the
brand name “Nike” in Spain for sportswear. Since 1932, Cidesport of Spain had used Nike for
sportswear so it went to court to stop Nike (US) from selling sportswear in Spain. The court
battle ended by allowing Nike (US) to sell its brand of sports shoes since Cidesport did no use
Hill, W. L. C. (2013). International Business: Competing in the global marketplace (9th Ed.).
http://thevincentian.com/common-law-versus-code-law-in-business-interactions-p14127-
1.htm