Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

Republic of the Philippines

MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN CITIES


Second Judicial Region
Branch V
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES CRIMINAL CASE NO. ______

-versus- for

CASIMIR OROLAZA, RECKLESS IMPRUDENCE RESULTING


No. 57 Sparrow Street, San Gabriel IN HOMICIDE
Village, Tuguegarao City
Accused.
x-------------------------------------------------------x

PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER

A Preliminary Conference was conducted by this Court to determine the issues


and secure admissions from the Parties. The Prosecution was represented
by Public Prosecutor Tristan Colosaga and Private Prosecutor Ian Marigmen and the
defendant by Atty. Philip Castillo and Atty. Betsy .
STIPULATION OF FACTS:
PROSECUTION:
The following proposals were admitted by the accused through counsel, to wit:
1. The identity of the accused, Casimir Orolaza;
2. That on or about September 07, 2018, the accused was driving a Black Euro
motorcycle with Plate No. AA-237 along the highway of Barangay Buntun,
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan;
3. The fact of the existence of Death Certificate and its genuineness and due
execution;
4. That the incident was investigated by SPO1 Harley Umoso who responded to
the scene of the incident;
5. That the incident was reported to the police authorities by the witness Dane
Garcia; and
6. That SPO1 Zeneth Quilenderino arrested the Accused.
DEFENSE:
The following proposal was admitted by the prosecution, to wit:
1. That the accused went to Enrile Cagayan for his Uncles’ wake.
2. That Dra. Laiza Frogosa is an expert witness;
3. That the accused with Police Officers Harley Umoso and Zeneth Quilenderino
went to the hospital to save the victim.
DOCUMENTARY EXHIBITS

PROSECUTION:

The following exhibits were marked by the prosecution:


1. Exhibit “A” - Judicial Affidavit of Dane Garcia
2. Exhibit “B” - Judical Affidavit of SPO1 Harley Umoso
3. Exhibit “C” - Excerpt from the Police Blotter under Entry No.123
4. Exhibit “D” - a rough sketch of the scene of the incident
5. Exhibit “E” - Judical Affidavit of SPO1 Zeneth Quilenderino
6. Exhibit “F” -Receipts Evidencing Expenses of burial.

DEFENSE:

The following exhibits were marked by the defense:


1. Exhibit “1” - Judicial Affidavit of the accused, Casimir Orolaza.
2. Exhibit “2” - Judicial Affidavit of Dra. Laiza Frogoso
3. Exhibit “3” - Death Certificate of Charlie Danao dated September 7, 2018
4. Exhibit “4” - Judicial Affidavit of Lovely Siazon

WITNESSES
PROSECUTION:
1. Daniel GArcia
2. SPO1 Harley Umoso
3. SPO1 Zeneth Quilenderino
4. Dianne Kengay

DEFENSE:
1. Casimir Orolaza
2. Dra. Laiza Frogoso
3. Lovely Ann Siazon
4. Betsy
ISSUES
1. Whether or not the Accused commited the crime charged; and
2. Whether or not the accused is under the influence of liquor at the time of the
commission of the crime;
TRIAL DATES
The parties agreed on the date of the trial, to wit: Septembe 28, Oct. 16, and
25, 2018.

Considering that the preliminary conference has been terminated, the paties
are directed to go over the Preliminary Conference Order so that if there be any
error, they may take steps to correct the same within ten(10) days from receipt of
this order;otherwise, they will be barred from doing so, and the parties shall be
bound by the Preliminary Conference Order.
Let the initial presentation of evidence for the prosecution be set on
September 28, 2018
So ordered.
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan, September 13, 2018.
CHARMAIGNE CUMIGAD

Presiding Judge

Conforme:

Dianne Kengay CASIMIR OROLAZA


Complainant Accused

TRISTAN COLOSAGA PHILIP ULYSES CASTILLO


Public Prosecutor Defense Counsel

IAN MARIGMEN BETSY


Private Prosecutor Private Counsel

S-ar putea să vă placă și