Anexo4.2 Muro Lomas4

DISEÑO DE MURO DE CONTENCION EN RELAVERA LAS LOMAS
JORGE ESPINO LAZO JM&L INGENIERIA SAC
Gravity wall analysis

Input data
Project
Task : DISEÑO DE MURO DE CONTENCION EN RELAVERA LAS LOMAS
Part : JM&L INGENIERIA SAC
Descript. : MURO DE MANPOSTERIA
Author : JORGE ESPINO LAZO
Customer : CIA EXPLOMAX GOLD SA
Date : 10/09/2018
Settings
USA - Safety factor
Materials and standards
Concrete structures : ACI 318-11
Wall analysis
Active earth pressure calculation : Coulomb
Passive earth pressure calculation : Mazindrani (Rankin)
Earthquake analysis : Mononobe-Okabe
Shape of earth wedge : Calculate as skew
Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor for overturning : SFo = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for sliding resistance : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for bearing capacity : SFb = 2.00 [–]
Material of structure
Unit weight  = 23.56 kN/m 3
Analysis of concrete structures carried out according to the standard ACI 318-11.
Concrete : Concrete ACI

Compressive strength fc' = 15.00 MPa
Tensile-bending strength fr = 2.41 MPa
Longitudinal steel : A615/40
Tensile strength fy = 100.00 MPa
Geometry of structure
Coordinate Depth
No.
X [m] Z [m]
1 0.00 0.00
2 0.00 2.00
3 0.50 2.00
4 0.50 2.54
5 -1.20 2.45
6 -1.20 2.00
7 -0.70 2.00
8 -0.30 0.00
The origin [0,0] is located at the most upper right point of the wall.
Wall section area = 1.84 m2.
1
[GeoStructural Analysis - Gravity Wall | version 5.17.7.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol. s r.o. All Rights Reserved | www.finesoftware.eu]
Basic soil parameters

ef cef  su 
No. Name Pattern
[°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [°]
1 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense 35.50 0.00 18.50 9.00 30.00
Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency

2 25.00 12.00 21.00 11.00 10.00
firm
All soils are considered as cohesionless for at rest pressure analysis.
Soil parameters
Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
Unit weight :  = 18.50 kN/m 3
Stress-state : effective
Angle of internal friction : ef = 35.50 °
Cohesion of soil : cef = 0.00 kPa
Angle of friction struc.-soil :  = 30.00 °
Soil : cohesionless
Saturated unit weight : sat = 19.00 kN/m 3
Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm

Angle of friction struc.-soil :  = 10.00 °
Soil : cohesionless
Geological profile and assigned soils

Layer
No. Assigned soil Pattern
[m]
1 2.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
2 1.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm
3 1.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
4 - Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
2
Name : Profile and assignment Stage : 1
2.54
Terrain profile
Terrain behind construction has the slope 1: 5.00 (slope angle is 11.31 °).
Water influence
Ground water table is located below the structure.
Resistance on front face of the structure

Resistance on front face of the structure: at rest
Soil on front face of the structure - Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
Soil thickness in front of structure h = 0.80 m
Terrain in front of structure is flat.
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient kh = 0.2000
Vertical seismic coefficient kv = 0.0000
Water below the GWT is restricted.
Settings of the stage of construction

Design situation : permanent
Verification No. 1
Pressure at rest on front face of the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  Kr Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 0.35 11.31 35.50 0.00 18.50 0.419
2 0.00 89.85(80.00) 35.50 0.00 18.50 0.419 MODIFIED
3 0.45 0.00 35.50 0.00 18.50 0.419
Pressure at rest distribution on front face of the structure
Layer Start [m] Z W Pressure Hor. comp. Vert. comp.
No. End [m] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa] [kPa]
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.35 6.47 0.00 2.95 2.66 1.27
0.35 6.47 0.00 6.39 0.47 6.38
2
0.35 6.50 0.00 6.42 0.47 6.40
3

0.35 6.50 0.00 2.73 2.73 0.00
3
0.80 14.80 0.00 6.21 6.21 0.00
Active pressure behind the structure - partial results
Layer Thickness  d cd  d Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] [°]
1 0.82 0.00 35.50 0.00 18.50 30.00 0.277
2 1.18 23.04 35.50 0.00 18.50 35.50 0.616
3 0.54 0.00 25.00 12.00 21.00 10.00 0.431
Active pressure distribution behind the structure (without surcharge)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1
0.82 15.25 0.00 4.22 3.66 2.11
0.82 15.25 0.00 9.40 4.90 8.01
2
2.00 37.00 0.00 22.80 11.90 19.45
2.00 37.00 0.00 0.89 0.87 0.15
3
2.54 48.23 0.00 5.73 5.64 0.99
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure) - partial results
Layer Thickness d   Ka Kae Kae-Ka Comment
No. [m] [°] [°] [°]
1 0.82 35.50 11.31 11.31 0.277 0.486 0.209
2 1.18 35.50 11.31 11.31 0.616 1.090 0.473
3 0.54 25.00 11.31 11.31 0.441 0.766 0.325
Earthquake effects (active earth pressure)
Layer Start [m] Z D Pressure Hor. comp. Vertical comp.
0.00 0.00 48.23 10.08 8.73 5.04
1
0.82 15.25 32.99 6.90 5.97 3.45
0.82 15.25 32.99 15.62 8.15 13.32
2
2.00 37.00 11.24 5.32 2.78 4.54
2.00 37.00 11.24 3.65 3.59 0.63
3
2.54 48.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Forces acting on construction
Name Fhor App.Pt. Fvert App.Pt. Design
[kN/m] z [m] [kN/m] x [m] coefficient
Weight - wall 0.00 -0.81 43.29 0.91 1.000
Earthq.- constr. 8.66 -0.81 0.00 0.91 1.000
FF resistance -2.47 -0.27 0.23 0.51 1.000
Weight - earth wedge 0.00 -0.84 5.44 1.37 1.000
Earthquake - soil wedge 1.09 -0.84 0.00 1.37 1.000
Active pressure 13.13 -0.95 17.32 1.47 1.000
Earthq.- act.pressure 13.45 -1.49 14.17 1.36 1.000
4
Verification of complete wall

Check for overturning stability
Resisting moment Mres = 91.69 kNm/m
Overturning moment Movr = 39.84 kNm/m
Safety factor = 2.30 > 1.50

Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY
Check for slip

Resisting horizontal force Hres = 53.43 kN/m
Active horizontal force Hact = 29.79 kN/m

Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY
Forces acting at the centre of footing bottom

Overall moment M = 17.97 kNm/m
Normal force N = 82.04 kN/m
Shear force Q = 29.71 kN/m
Overall check - WALL is SATISFACTORY
Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Forces acting at the centre of the footing bottom
Moment Norm. force Shear Force Eccentricity Stress
No.
[kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [m] [kPa]
1 17.97 82.04 29.71 0.22 64.90
Bearing capacity of foundation soil check
Eccentricity verification
Max. eccentricity of normal force e = 219.0 mm
Maximum allowable eccentricity ealw = 561.7 mm
Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY
Footing bottom bearing capacity verification

Max. stress at footing bottom  = 64.90 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil Rd = 275.00 kPa
Bearing capacity of foundation soil is SATISFACTORY
Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY
5
Dimensioning No. 1
Name : Dimensioning Stage : 1; Dimensioning : 1
23.54 7.73
4.71 10.23
2.54
0.51
+x
1.70
+z
Slope stability analysis

Input data
Project
Settings
USA - Safety factor
Stability analysis
Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Interface
Coordinates of interface points [m]
No. Interface location
x z x z x z
-10.00 -1.65 -1.20 -1.65 -0.63 -1.65
-0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 2.00
6
Coordinates of interface points [m]

No. Interface location
x z x z x z
0.00 0.00 0.00 -2.00 0.50 -2.00
10.00 -2.00
-10.00 -2.45 -1.20 -2.45 -1.20 -2.00

-0.70 -2.00 -0.63 -1.65
0.50 -2.00 0.50 -2.54 10.00 -2.54
-1.20 -2.45 0.50 -2.54
-10.00 -3.00 0.00 -3.00 10.00 -3.00
-10.00 -4.00 0.00 -4.00 10.00 -4.00
Soil parameters - effective stress state

ef cef 
No. Name Pattern
[°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense 35.50 0.00 18.50
2 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm 25.00 12.00 21.00
7
Soil parameters - uplift

sat s n
No. Name Pattern
[kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense 19.00
2 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm 21.00
Soil parameters
Poorly graded sand (SP), dense
Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm

Rigid bodies

No. Name Sample
[kN/m3]
1 Wall material 23.56
Assigning and surfaces

Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned
No. Surface position
x z x z soil
0.00 -2.00 0.50 -2.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),
10.00 -2.00 10.00 2.00 dense
0.00 0.00
-1.20 -2.45 -1.20 -2.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

-0.70 -2.00 -0.63 -1.65 dense
-1.20 -1.65 -10.00 -1.65
-10.00 -2.45
2
8
Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

No. Surface position
x z x z soil
0.50 -2.54 0.50 -2.00
Wall material
0.00 -2.00 0.00 0.00
-0.30 0.00 -0.63 -1.65
-0.70 -2.00 -1.20 -2.00
3
-1.20 -2.45
0.50 -2.54 10.00 -2.54 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI),

10.00 -2.00 0.50 -2.00 consistency firm
0.00 -3.00 10.00 -3.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI),

10.00 -2.54 0.50 -2.54 consistency firm
-1.20 -2.45 -10.00 -2.45
-10.00 -3.00
5
0.00 -4.00 10.00 -4.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

10.00 -3.00 0.00 -3.00 dense
-10.00 -3.00 -10.00 -4.00
0.00 -4.00 -10.00 -4.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

-10.00 -9.00 10.00 -9.00 dense
10.00 -4.00
Water
Water type : No water
Tensile crack
Tensile crack not inputted.
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient : Kh = 0.20
Vertical seismic coefficient : Kv = 0.00
9
Settings of the stage of construction

Design situation : permanent
Results (Stage of construction 1)
Analysis 1
Circular slip surface
Slip surface parameters
x= 0.16 [m] 1 = -21.92 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 9.90 [m] 2 = 50.30 [°]
Radius : R= 12.45 [m]
The slip surface after optimization.
Slope stability verification (Bishop)
Sum of active forces : Fa = 191.70 kN/m
Sum of passive forces : Fp = 325.16 kN/m
Sliding moment : Ma = 2386.71 kNm/m
Resisting moment : Mp = 4048.30 kNm/m
Factor of safety = 1.70 > 1.50
Slope stability ACCEPTABLE
Name : Analysis Stage - analysis : 1 - 1
10

Anexo4.2 Muro Lomas4

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Anexo4.2 Muro Lomas4

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

DISEÑO DE MURO DE CONTENCION EN RELAVERA LAS LOMAS

JORGE ESPINO LAZO JM&L INGENIERIA SAC

Gravity wall analysis

Concrete : Concrete ACI

Basic soil parameters

Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency

Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm

Geological profile and assigned soils

1 2.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense

2 1.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm

3 1.00 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense

4 - Poorly graded sand (SP), dense

Name : Profile and assignment Stage : 1

Resistance on front face of the structure

Settings of the stage of construction

Layer Start [m] Z W Pressure Hor. comp. Vert. comp.

Verification of complete wall

Safety factor = 2.30 > 1.50

Check for slip

Safety factor = 1.79 > 1.50

Forces acting at the centre of footing bottom

Bearing capacity of foundation soil

Footing bottom bearing capacity verification

Overall verification - bearing capacity of found. soil is SATISFACTORY

Slope stability analysis

Coordinates of interface points [m]

-10.00 -2.45 -1.20 -2.45 -1.20 -2.00

0.50 -2.00 0.50 -2.54 10.00 -2.54

-1.20 -2.45 0.50 -2.54

-10.00 -3.00 0.00 -3.00 10.00 -3.00

-10.00 -4.00 0.00 -4.00 10.00 -4.00

Soil parameters - effective stress state

1 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense 35.50 0.00 18.50

2 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm 25.00 12.00 21.00

Soil parameters - uplift

1 Poorly graded sand (SP), dense 19.00

2 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm 21.00

Low plasticity clay (CL,CI), consistency firm

1 Wall material 23.56

Assigning and surfaces

-1.20 -2.45 -1.20 -2.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

0.50 -2.54 10.00 -2.54 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI),

0.00 -3.00 10.00 -3.00 Low plasticity clay (CL,CI),

0.00 -4.00 10.00 -4.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

0.00 -4.00 -10.00 -4.00 Poorly graded sand (SP),

Settings of the stage of construction

Name : Analysis Stage - analysis : 1 - 1

S-ar putea să vă placă și