Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Blood Donation Statistics and Analysis

    Încărcat de

    Kamaladharanii Ragu Nathan
    29 vizualizări5 pagini
    The document discusses different statistical analyses conducted on survey data about attitudes towards blood donation. It includes summaries of analyses on mean, mode, median, standard deviation, t-tests comparing groups, ANOVA comparing races, and correlation between self-efficacy and intention. The key findings are that there were no significant differences found between genders in attitudes, attitudes became less nerve-racking before and after donation, and no significant differences among races or correlation between self-efficacy and intention.

    Descriere originală:

    Statistics

    Titlu original

    SPSS Data Result-Group Assignment

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document discusses different statistical analyses conducted on survey data about attitudes towards blood donation. It includes summaries of analyses on mean, mode, median, standard deviation, t-tests comparing groups, ANOVA comparing races, and correlation between self-efficacy and intention. The key findings are that there were no significant differences found between genders in attitudes, attitudes became less nerve-racking before and after donation, and no significant differences among races or correlation between self-efficacy and intention.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    29 vizualizări5 pagini

    Blood Donation Statistics and Analysis

    Încărcat de

    Kamaladharanii Ragu Nathan
    The document discusses different statistical analyses conducted on survey data about attitudes towards blood donation. It includes summaries of analyses on mean, mode, median, standard deviation, t-tests comparing groups, ANOVA comparing races, and correlation between self-efficacy and intention. The key findings are that there were no significant differences found between genders in attitudes, attitudes became less nerve-racking before and after donation, and no significant differences among races or correlation between self-efficacy and intention.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 5

    CHAP 3: MEAN, MODE AND MEDIAN

    Item: Blood donation is beneficial


    1 = strongly disagree
    2 = disagree
    3= sometimes disagree/agree
    4 = agree
    5 = strongly agree
    Statistics
    Attitude_Beneficial

    N Valid 40

    Missing 0
    Mean 4.0000
    Median 4.0000
    Mode 4.00

    CHAPTER 4: STANDARD DEVIATION AND VARIANCE


    Item: Blood donation is beneficial
    1 = strongly disagree
    2 = disagree
    3= sometimes disagree/agree
    4 = agree
    5 = strongly agree

    Statistics
    Attitude_Beneficial

    N Valid 40

    Missing 0
    Std. Deviation .81650
    Variance .667
    CHAPTER 10: T-TEST FOR TWO INDEPENDENT SAMPLES
    HO: There is no significant different between male and female towards attitude in blood donation

    Group Statistics

    D_7Gender_ControlVariable N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    SumScore_Attitude Male 34 54.2647 4.81355 .82552

    Female 5 53.4000 5.77062 2.58070

    Independent Samples Test

    Levene's Test for Equality of


    Variances t-test for Equality of Means

    95% Confidence Interval of

    Sig. (2- Mean Std. Error the Difference


    F Sig. t df tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper

    SumScore_Attitude Equal variances


    .371 .546 .366 37 .716 .86471 2.35940 -3.91589 5.64530
    assumed

    Equal variances not


    .319 4.854 .763 .86471 2.70952 -6.16367 7.89308
    assumed

    Result: Accept HO. There is no significant different between male and female towards attitude in blood donation.
    CHAPTER 11: T-TEST FOR TWO RELATED SAMPLES
    HO: There is no significant different in attitude (nerve racking) among respondents before and after donation

    Paired Samples Statistics

    Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

    Pair 1 A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_Before 4.2250 40 .80024 .12653

    A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_After 2.4000 40 1.31656 .20817

    Paired Samples Correlations

    N Correlation Sig.

    Pair 1 A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_Before &


    40 .058 .720
    A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_After

    Paired Samples Test

    Paired Differences

    95% Confidence Interval of the


    Difference

    Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

    Pair 1 A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_Before -
    1.82500 1.50021 .23720 1.34521 2.30479 7.694 39 .000
    A3_attitude_7NerveRacking_After

    Result: Reject HO. There is significant in attitude (nerve racking) among respondents before and after donation
    CHAPTER 12: ANOVA

    HO: There is no significant different among races towards social awareness

    Descriptives
    SumScore_social awareness

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

    Malay 6 37.1667 2.56255 1.04616 34.4774 39.8559 34.00 40.00


    Chinese 11 34.5455 4.05866 1.22373 31.8188 37.2721 26.00 40.00
    India 21 35.1429 3.26015 .71142 33.6589 36.6269 29.00 40.00
    Others 1 34.0000 . . . . 34.00 34.00
    Total 39 35.2564 3.40060 .54453 34.1541 36.3588 26.00 40.00

    ANOVA
    SumScore_social awareness

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Between Groups 29.304 3 9.768 .834 .485


    Within Groups 410.132 35 11.718
    Total 439.436 38

    Result: Accept HO. There is no significant difference among races towards attitude in blood donation.
    CHAPTER 14: CORRELATION
    HO: There is no significant correlation between self-efficacy and intention to donate blood.

    Correlations

    SumScore_Intention

    SumScore_Self-efficacy Pearson Correlation .060

    Sig. (2-tailed) .715

    N 40

    Result: Accept HO. There is no significant correlation between Self-efficacy and intention to donate
    blood.

    S-ar putea să vă placă și