Insulation Ebook PDF

Thermal Moisture Protection:
Insulation
Published by
Kenilworth Media Inc.
15 Wertheim Court, Suite 710
Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3H7
Toll-free: 800-409-8688
(905) 771-7333; Fax: (905) 771-7336
www.constructioncanada.net
The information and contents in this publication are believed by the

publisher to be true, correct, and accurate, but no independent investigation
has been undertaken. Accordingly, the publisher does not represent or
warrant that the information and contents are true, correct, or accurate,
and recommends that each reader seek appropriate professional advice,
guidance, and direction before acting or relying on all information
contained herein. Opinions expressed in the articles contained in this
publication are not necessarily those of the publisher.
© 2015 Kenilworth Media Inc. All rights reserved.

Contents
Part One 5
Specifying Polyiso for Continuous
Insulation in Walls
By Jared O. Blum
Part Two 12
Specifying Reflective Insulation
By David W. Yarbrough, PhD, PE
Part Three 21
Insulation’s Role in Controlling Noise
By Stacy Fitzgerald-Redd
Part Four 28
The Effect of Temperature on
Insulation Performance
by Christopher Schumacher, M.A.Sc.
Part Five 40
Thermal Barriers and the Protection
of Foamed Plastic
By John A. Dalton
4 C O N S T R U C T I O N C A N A D A I N S U L AT I O N
Part One
Specifying Polyiso for Continuous
Insulation in Walls
BY JARED O. BLUM
Jared O. Blum is the president of the Polyisocyanurate Insulation

Manufacturers Association (PIMA), which is the North American
trade association representing manufacturers of polyiso foam
insulation. He can be reached via e-mail at joblum@pima.org.
All images courtesy Polyisocyanurate Insulation Manufacturers Association
Specifying Polyiso
for Continuous Insulation in Walls
Architects, specifiers, and building owners are striving to advance the way commercial and
residential building envelopes are developed, in response to more stringent policies for energy
conservation. Continuous insulation (ci) is prominently featured as a solution because it is an
effective means of addressing these challenges.
Figure 1
Wood Framing
Continuous Insulation (Polyiso)
Cavity Insulation
Continuous
Insulation Masonry
Cladding (Lap Siding Shown) or Concrete
Poly
iso
Steel Framing Continuous

Insulation
Cavity
Insulation
iso
ly
Po
Gypsum Wallboard
(Interior side)
Cladding (Brick - OR - Cladding
Veneer Shown) (Exterior Side)
Light frame and mass wall systems with continuous insulation (ci) for
code-compliant residential and commercial building construction.
In American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

90.1-2010, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-rise Residential Buildings, the ci
concept is defined as:
insulation that is continuous across all structural members without thermal bridges other than
fasteners and service openings. It is installed on the interior, exterior, or is integral to any opaque
surface of the building envelope.
This approach is not new to insulation—it has been commonly employed for many years
on various types of low-slope roofing systems. However, use of truly continuous insulation
within building walls has lagged behind its energy-saving potential.
The situation is changing through the emphasis of higher-performing wall assemblies.
This article focuses on the application of ci to building walls. Like any construction
material, ci must be properly specified to ensure its intended performance and
appropriate use. In this regard, this article addresses five topics to consider when
specifying ci for walls:
• function and versatility;
• materials;
• modern energy code requirements;
• building code requirements; and
• construction detailing.
Function and versatility

As shown in Figure 1, ci can be used with various wall structural systems and cladding
materials, such as:
Figure 2
CONTINUOUS INSULATION RVALUE PER INCH

MATERIAL TYPE OF THICKNESS
Fibreglass blown into wall 3.2
EPS (ASTM C578, Type II) 4.0
XPS (ASTM C578, Type X) 5.0
Polyiso (ASTM C1289, Type I) 6.0*
Examples of minimum R-value per inch for common types of continuous

insulation (foam sheathing). Refer to manufacturer data for specific R-values.
• cement board;
• portland cement stucco;
• wood lap;
• brick veneer;
• stone; and
• vinyl siding.
In all these applications, its primary function is to provide code-compliant or better
energy conservation performance. Additionally, properly qualified and installed ci
products can serve other important functions for exterior wall assemblies, including air
barriers and water-resistive barriers (WRBs). When laminated to structural materials, ci
can even provide structural functions such as wall bracing. It is important to refer to the
insulation manufacturer’s data for code-approved capabilities.
Polyiso and continuous insulation

Various foam plastic insulating sheathing materials and other types of products are
available to address ci applications on walls. The most common foam plastic insulating
sheathing materials include expanded polystyrene (EPS), extruded polystyrene (XPS),
and polyisocyanurate (polyiso) foam. Each product type has different thermal properties
(affecting the required thickness), costs, and capabilities, as shown in Figure 2.1
Regarding polyiso, it is a closed-cell, rigid foam board insulation used primarily on
the roofs and walls of offices, healthcare facilities, warehouses, retail, and industrial
manufacturing facilities and educational institutions. One of North America’s most
widely-used and cost-effective insulation products, it offers excellent fire performance.
As roof insulation, it meets Factory Mutual (FM) 4450, Approval Standard for Class 1
Insulated Steel Roof Decks, and Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 1256, Fire Test of Roof
Deck Constructions. As a wall component, it meets ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for
Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials.
As Figure 2 illustrates, polyisocyanurate continuous insulation has at least a 20 to 80
per cent greater R-value per inch than other common types of continuous insulation.
When compared to fibreglass insulation blown into walls, polyiso’s R-value is 87 per
cent higher and when compared to XPS, polyiso’s thermal performance is 20 per cent
higher. This means more energy savings and/or more manageable wall thicknesses.
With thinner, energy-efficient walls using polyiso continuous insulation, there will be
more usable floor area within the footprint of the building. Also, cladding materials are
more easily installed.
Modern energy code requirements

Continuous insulation provides one of the most thermally efficient ways of complying
with modern energy codes. It mitigates avoidable heat loss due to thermal bridging in
walls that are not continuously insulated. Building codes require structures to meet
certain R-values to achieve a specific level of efficiency. The climate zone plays a big
role in determining what the minimum R-value has to be for a specific region.
According to ASHRAE 90.1’s Table B1-2, Canada is in Climate Zones 6, 7, and 8,
with some example solutions using continuous insulation illustrated in Figure 3 (page
10). The country’s National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) defines climate zones
differently in increments of 1000 heating degree days (18 C [64 F] basis). For these and
other reasons, solutions may vary for a given project location depending on the climate
zone and which code is used.
Building code requirements

When using continuous insulation to meet or exceed the applicable energy code, other
matters of building code compliance should also be considered.
Water-resistive barrier
Many ci products can be used as a WRB behind cladding—providing water resistance
and thermal performance in one product. It is important to refer to the manufacturer’s
installation instructions and code-compliance data. Alternatively, water-resistive
barriers can be separately applied to walls with ci.
Wind pressure resistance

For code compliance guidance on wind pressure resistance of foam sheathing
materials, one should refer to the manufacturer’s installation instructions and design
data. In some applications, wind pressure resistance is only a matter of temporary
construction concern because the product is encompassed or restrained by other
materials designed to resist wind pressure.
In other cases, the foam sheathing material may be required to resist wind loads.
For example, in their 2015 editions, the U.S. model building codes now reference
American National Standards Institute/Structural Building Components Association
(ANSI/SBCA) FS 100, Standard Requirements for Wind Pressure Resistance of Foam
Plastic Insulating Sheathing.2 Depending on the foam sheathing type and thickness
used, its wind pressure capability may actually exceed the capacity of the supporting
framing.3 Thus, wind pressure resistance is a matter that must apply to all components
in any given wall assembly for a complete solution.
Cladding (siding) attachment

Various proprietary and standard fasteners and connection strategies can be used for
attachment and support of cladding materials when installed over ci. Several standardized
Figure 3
ASHRAE 90.1 2010  RESIDENTIAL
Cavity Continuous
CLIMATE ZONE
Insulation insulation
Zone 6 (2 x 4 walls) 13 7.5
Zone 7 (2 x 4 walls) 13 7.5
Zone 8 (2 x 4 walls) 13 15.6
Continuous insulation minimizes thermal bridging and provides economic

and performance benefits over use of cavity insulation in exterior walls.
solutions for gattaching siding and furring over foam sheathing up to 102 mm
(4 in.) thick have been added to the 2015 editions of the U.S. model building codes.
The design professional and cladding installer should consult the cladding
manufacturer’s installation requirements to co-ordinate requirements. For example,
minimum siding fastener size and penetration into framing should be maintained;
longer fasteners may be required.
Fire performance
Foam plastics are held to a comprehensive set of fire-performance requirements that,
in some cases, exceed those applied to other common construction materials. The
requirements include various types of fire tests and criteria to address flame spread,
smoke development, and ignition protection.
Foamed plastics used as part of a non-load bearing exterior wall must comply with the
full scale fire test UL Canada (CAN/ULC) S134, Standard Method of Fire Test of Exterior
Wall Assemblies. Load-bearing walls using foam plastics must comply with CAN/ULC
S102, Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials
and Assemblies.
Moisture vapour retarders

It is important to ensure ci is specified with moisture vapour retarders in such a way
vapour is properly managed. Diffusion is managed by control of vapour permeance
and surface temperatures of the material layers comprising an assembly. For example,
the National Building Code of Canada (NBC) has provisions in Part 9, Section 9.25.5
addressing the use of low-perm materials on the exterior side of a wall assembly by
providing insulation ratios to control surface temperatures in combination with the
use of a Class I (vapour-impermeable) or Class II (vapour-semi-impermeable) interior
vapour retarder.
As with any building assembly, a hygrothermal analysis may be performed to justify
alternative designs and address special conditions for moisture vapour control. For
example, a design using a ‘smart vapour retarder’ may provide an appropriate level
Polyiso continuous insulation can enable thinner, more energy-efficient walls—
this creates more usable floor area within the footprint of the building.
of moisture diffusion control while also improving drying potential. Finally, adequate
control over indoor relative humidity (RH) and minimization of air-leakage by use of
a continuous air barrier system is important to a completely integrated and successful
approach to moisture vapour control for any wall assembly.
Construction detailing
It is important to provide workable and complete construction details for walls with ci
to ensure a constructible and functional assembly relating to many of the previously
discussed topics. Construction details to consider include:
• envelope component attachments;
• integration of flashing and WRB;
• integration of furring (if used) around wall penetrations and flashing;
• attachment of cladding to wall framing through ci or to furring;
• details for cladding attachments through ci at inside and outside corners; and
• installation detailing per NFPA 285 tested assembly when required.
Various useful detailing concepts can be found from various sources online.4
For proprietary cladding or exterior wallcovering systems that include continuous
insulation, the specific manufacturer’s installation details and instructions should
be consulted.5
Notes
1
For additional information on polyisocyanurate, visit www.pima.org—the site of the
Polyiso Insulation Manufacturers Association. For the other materials mentioned,
industry association websites offer a variety of technical resources. Visit www.xpsa.com,
www.epsmolders.org, and www.foamsheathing.org.
2
For more info, visit www.sbcindustry.com/sbca-standards-development.
3
Visit apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/building_america/highr_walls_
wind_pressure_test_.pdf.
4
For example, visit www.drjengineering.org/products/foam-sheathing.
5
For more information on the advantages of continuous insulation over other non-
continuous insulation wall sheathing choices, visit polyiso.org.
Part Two
Specifying Reflective Insulation
BY DAVID W. YARBROUGH, PHD, PE
David W. Yarbrough, PhD, PE,is vice-president of R&D Services,

an independent lab specializing in thermal insulations. He is
also an emeritus professor of chemical engineering at Tennessee
Technological University. A collaborator with the Reflective
Insulation Manufacturers Association (RIMA International),
Yarbrough is a member of the Building Enclosure Technology and
Environment Council (BETEC) Board of Directors, ASTM Committee
C16, and ASHRAE. He can be reached at dave@rdservices.com.
Images courtesy RIMA International
Specifying
Reflective Insulation
Building envelope and equipment applications
The effective specification and installation of all types of thermal insulation requires an
understanding of the factors affecting performance. The specification of a thermal resistance
(RSI or R-value) alone does not ensure the intended heat-flow reduction. In virtually all cases,
space for insulation must be provided and insulation material must be installed to conform with
the manufacturers’ requirements. In the case of reflective insulations, factors such as heat-flow
direction, air-space dimensions, and location in the building envelope should be considered.1
Figure 1
RSI for 20-mm Air Gap
1.00
0.80
0.60 Down
RSI
Horizontal
0.40 Up
0.20
0.00
-40 -20 0 20 40
Mean Temperature (C)
RSI for 40-mm Air Gap
2.00
1.50
1.50 Down
RSI
Horizontal
1.00 Up
0.50
0.00
-40 -20 0 20 40
Mean Temperature (C)
The upper-most table shows the calculated RSI for 20-mm (4⁄5-in.) air
gaps. The bottom shows the calculated RSI for 40-mm (1 3⁄5-in.) gaps.
The specification of conditioning equipment and reliable prediction of utility use requires
understanding of the variation of the performance of any selected insulation with,
for example, temperature, air movement, and thickness. In addition, the thermal
performance of enclosed reflective air spaces (reflective insulations) depends on heat-
flow direction, placement of low-emittance surfaces, and temperature differences.
This article discusses factors to be considered in the specification of reflective
insulation systems. In the United States, the labelling and specification of reflective
insulations for use in the building envelope or to insulate equipment is set out in
ASTM C1224, Standard Specification for Reflective Insulation for Building Applications. However,
Canada has not yet published a standard or guide for the evaluation of reflective
insulation products.
Product Types and Applications
Product type Typical applications
• wall cavity to form one or more reflective air spaces
• bottom edge or side of rafter to form an enclosed reflective air space
below the roof deck
Single sheet • bottom edge of floor joists to form a reflective air space
• between floor joists to form a reflective air space
• between and below floor joists to form two reflective air spaces
• reflective house wrap
• wall cavity to form one or more reflective air spaces
• bottom edge or side of rafter to form an enclosed reflective air space
below the roof deck
Single-layer bubblepack
• reflective duct insulation
• water heater wrap
• reflective house wrap
Double-layer bubblepack • same applications as single bubblepack
Faced polyethylene foam • foil or film faced and used in same applications as bubblepack
• installed in wall cavities, between floor joists, between rafters in attics,

Multilayer insulation between rafters in cathedral ceiling
• masonry wall insulation
Reflective panels
• form enclosed reflective air space with low emittance on one side
(sheathing)
Faced rigid foam board • low-emittance foil or film with adjacent enclosed air space
Faced wood panels • low-emittance foil of film with adjacent enclosed air space
Therefore, the development of a specification for a specific project should take

into account both the intended location and the space available for the reflective
insulation assembly. It should also examine several other criteria in order to parallel
the ASTM standard. Such aspects include:
• location, dimensions, and heat-flow direction for the space to be insulated;
• RSI m2·K/W (R-value) for the installed reflective insulation assembly (assembly
value includes the RSI for the material);
• emittance of the surface(s) of the particular reflective insulation material;
• resistance to humidity should be represented by test results showing emittance is
not significantly increased by exposure to high humidity;
• surface burning characteristics, along with flame-spread and smoke-development
indices;
• water vapour transmission (i.e. permeance): given both water vapour retarders
and water vapour-transmitting (i.e. perforated) products are available, selection
depends on local regulations and building enclosure design;
• installation instructions for building or equipment applications; and
• resistance to fungal growth, absence of bleeding and delamination, and satisfactory
pliability are elements of ASTM C1224—a laboratory test report should show
satisfactory performance is achieved.
Basis for performance
Thermal radiation across air spaces is an important part of the overall heat transfer
across the building envelope in all climates. This thermal radiation is proportional
to the effective emittance (E), which depends on the emittances of the hot and cold
surfaces enclosing the region, as shown:
E = 1/(1/εcold + 1/εhot – 1) (1)
In other words, the effective emittance for an enclosed air space depends on the
emittance of both the insulation and the surface it faces.
‘Effective emittance’ describes the performance that results from two parallel surfaces
bounding an enclosed reflective air space. It does not depend on the direction of heat
flow. The locations for emittances, hot and cold, can be reversed without changing the
value of E. This means a low-emittance surface performs the same when installed on
either the cold or warm side of an enclosed air space.
Reflective insulation products use low-emittance surfaces to suppress thermal
radiation, providing thermal resistance. They differ from many other insulations in
that the thermal resistance is based on an assembly consisting of both the product itself
and the adjacent enclosed air spaces. (Reflective insulation materials installed in the
building envelope result in reflective insulation assemblies.)
Thermal emittance is a number between zero and one. Reflective products have at
least one surface with an emittance near zero and facing an enclosed (unvented) air
space. Metals with smooth polished surfaces generally have emittance less than 0.1,
while most building materials like wood and masonry are around 0.9.
Aluminum foils and metalized films have been the materials of choice for the exterior
surfaces of the reflective insulation (i.e. facers) because of their low emittance, low
cost, corrosion resistance, and favourable mechanical properties. Aluminum in the
form of thin foils or metalized films laminated to a substrate such as paper, wood, or
plastic are used to produce reflective insulations. The thermal emittance value (total
hemispherical emittance), consequently, is a very important specification requirement
for any reflective insulations—it is generally in the 0.03 to 0.06 range.
The following equations are often used to estimate the thermal resistance (RSI) for
an enclosed reflective air space that is part of the building envelope.
RSI = ΔT / (Q rad + Q convection-conduction)
Qrad = E · σ · ([Thot + 273.15]4 – [Tcold + 273.15]4)

where σ = 5.67 · 10-8 W/(m2·K4) and T is in degrees C.
This equation is also one of many expressions used to calculate the convective
contribution to the total heat flow:
Qconvection-conduction = Nu · ( λ air · ΔT /L)
RSI for enclosed reflective air spaces can be measured using a hot-box facility, which
is a large-scale apparatus for measuring the heat flow across a building element such
as a section of wall. It must be operated in accordance with ASTM C1224 or reliably
estimated using engineering correlations2 or computer simulations.3
Products
Reflective insulations include single-sheet products that consist of low-emittance
foils or films bonded to a substrate such as paper, plastic, or polyethylene bubblepack
and multiple-layer insulations. (See “Product Types and Applications, page 15.”) In
most cases, both sides of the single-sheet insulation are faced with low-emittance foil
or film. When only one side has a low-emittance surface, it is important to install that
facing the enclosed air space. Reflective insulations with low-emittance surfaces on
both sides are commonly used to create two enclosed reflective air spaces in series.
The reflective insulation products with multiple layers are installed to form two or
more enclosed reflective air spaces. The specified number of layers and the spacing
must be present for the expected thermal resistance to be achieved. Polyethylene
bubblepack faced with low emittance foil or film is generally available in two
thicknesses: ‘single’ bubble products nominally 6 mm (¼ in.) thick and ‘double’
bubble products 12 mm (½ in.) thick. The applications for the two are the same, but
the double-bubble insulation has a greater material R-value and tear strength.
Most reflective insulation products can also be used as ‘radiant barriers’—a
term employed for ventilated spaces or large air spaces like a residential attic. The
distinction between reflective insulations and radiant barriers results from the way
the material is used. Reflective insulations are enclosed reflective air spaces (i.e. non-
ventilated) while radiant barriers involve ventilated air spaces. Enclosed reflective air
spaces are labelled with RSI-values that have the same units and same meaning as
other building insulations; radiant barriers are not labelled with an RSI-value.
The thermal performance of reflective assemblies varies with temperature, as is the
case with all insulations. R-values for thermal insulation materials typically decrease
as the temperature increases. Products are labelled at a particular temperature—
for example, 24 C (75 F)—so comparisons of competing products can be made on a
uniform basis.
The thermal performance also varies with temperature difference since gravity-driven
convection is a factor. The convective component increases as temperature difference
across an enclosed reflective cavity increases. The thermal resistance has a strong
dependence of heat-flow direction, thus requiring the intended use or location of the
reflective insulation be known before RSI values can be assigned. This is because the
temperature of the enclosed air space and the temperature difference across it depend
on the location in the envelope.
The temperature difference across an enclosed air space depends on the overall
design of the building envelope where the reflective insulation is to be used. The air-gap
temperature difference is a fraction of the total air-to-air temperature difference at the
location in question.
ΔTair gap = ΔTtotal · RSI air gap / RSI total
RSI air gap = ΔTair gap · RSI total / ΔT total
Figure 2
Exterior Cladding or Stucco

A
Exterior OSB Sheathing
Unfaced 89 mm Fiberglass Batt
140 mm Studs
0.41 or 0.61 mm OC
Interior Drywall
Multi-Layer
reflective insulation
Hybrid application using fibreglass insulation and a reflective insulation assembly in a wood-
framed wall.
B Exterior Cladding or Stucco
Exterior OSB Sheathing

Spray 1PMZVSFUIBOF'PBN
89 mm Studs
Images courtesy Fi-Foil Company
0.41 or 0.61 OC
Interior Drywall
Multi-Layer
reflective insulation
Hybrid application using sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation and a reflective insulation
assembly in a wood-framed wall.
A solution for ΔTair gap or RSI air gap involves an iterative procedure since RSI total includes
RSI air gap and ΔT total includes ΔTair gap.4 The performance of the enclosed reflective air
space is best when the ratio RSI air gap / RSI total is small. This is often the case when an
enclosed reflective air space is part of a hybrid insulation assembly.
The variation in thermal resistance (RSI in W/m2·K) is shown in Figure 1 (page 14)
for mean temperatures from −26 to 94 C (about −15 to 200 F) and air gaps of 20 and 40
mm (4⁄5 and 1 3⁄5 in.) in a wall, ceiling, or floor assembly. The RSIs were calculated using
the procedure described in ASTM Special Technical Publication (STP) 1116, Insulation
Materials: Testing and Applications, using a 10-C (18-F) temperature difference across the
air gap.
The RSI-value in Figure 2 demonstrates the reflective assemblies perform as well or
better at low temperatures than they do at high temperatures. The significant difference
in RSI with changes in heat-flow direction is shown in the figure. The differences in RSI
Figure 3 Figure 4
Photo courtesy Covertech Fabricating

Photo courtesy Reflectix
Fibreglass-reflective insulation hybrid. Reflective duct installation.
with heat-flow direction is due to the convective component largely absent in the
heat-flow down direction. There is significant increase in RSI with thickness in
the heat-flow down direction because the heat transport is primarily conduction.
There is not a significant increase in RSI with thickness increase from 20 to
40 mm when radiation is the dominant heat-transfer mechanism. This type of
performance differs from fibrous or cellular plastic insulation where convection
is not usually present.
Hybrid insulation assemblies

Reflective insulations are used with other insulations like fibreglass or sprayed
polyurethane foam (SPF) to form hybrid insulation assemblies. The hybrid assembly’s
thermal resistance is the sum of the individual RSI-values. The use of enclosed
reflective air spaces in this case is attractive because uninsulated space is able to be
ungraded to an enclosed reflective air space. Additionally, the temperature difference
across the reflective air space is generally minimal, which makes the convective
component of the heat transfer small or absent. This is an optimal situation for a
reflective insulation assembly.
Figure 2a (page 18) shows a hybrid system that combines fibreglass insulation and
a reflective insulation. Figure 2b (page 18) is a hybrid system using sprayfoam as
one component. In both cases, the total thermal resistance in the cavity is the sum of
the fibrous or foam insulation and the reflective insulation assembly. A specification
should identify the total thermal resistance to be provided by the hybrid assembly.
For this type of system, the overall thermal resistance should be stated along with the
RSI-value to be provided by the fibreglass or spray-foam insulation. The space allocated
to the reflective components should also be specified. If the reflective insulation
assembly is intended to be water vapour transmitting or a water vapour barrier, then
the type should be specified.
Figure 3 shows a fibreglass-reflective hybrid. The fibreglass has been compressed to
provide space for inset stapling of the reflective insulation. This type of assembly can
also be constructed using furring strips as spacers. The photograph shows only two
cavities with reflective insulation installed.
Reflective duct insulation

Reflective insulation can be installed on air-handling equipment (i.e. ducts) with and
without spacers—material to maintain an enclosed air space between the duct surface
and the insulation material wrapped around. Figure 4 (page 19), shows an example of
a reflective duct installation that includes radial spacers and two reflective air spaces.
The thermal resistance of this type of product is determined in accordance with
ASTM C1668, Standard Specification for Externally Applied Reflective Insulation Systems
on Rigid Duct in Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning, for an assembly specified
by the manufacturer. The specification of this type of insulation should include the
requirement for spacers (when appropriate), the distance across the air gaps, and the
thermal resistance.
Specialty applications
Reflective insulation assemblies for water heaters and garage doors have been available
for many years. The thermal resistance intended for the application should be
specified along with a requirement for detailed installation instructions. The thermal
performance includes a contribution from the air space between the surface of the door
and the reflective insulation. The assembly should be specified in terms of number of
layers and spacing that will provide the label RSI-value.
Conclusion
Enclosed reflective air spaces provide resistance to heat flow by significant reduction in
radiation across air spaces due to presence of low-emittance surfaces. In many cases,
there will be air movement (convection) inside the enclosed air space. The convective
component of the total heat gain or loss varies with heat-flow direction being the least
when the heat-flow direction is downward and temperature difference that is usually
small in the case of hybrid systems.
Like all thermal insulations, the thermal performance of enclosed reflective air
spaces is characterized by an R-value. The use of reflective insulation as part of a
hybrid system provides a way to optimize the use of the available space for insulation
in cold climates.
For more information on reflective insulation, design/construction professionals can
contact the Reflective Insulation Manufacturers Association (RIMA International).
Notes
1
This author acknowledges Wesley Hall (Reflectix) for reviewing the article.
2
For more, see ASTM Special Technical Publication (STP) 1116, Insulation Materials:
Testing and Applications, by this author and A.O. Desjarlais. Also, see International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) 6946, Building Components and Building
Elements—Thermal Resistance and Thermal Transmittance: Calculation Method.
3
See the article, “Investigation of Thermal Performance of Reflective Insulations
for Different Applications,” by Hamed H. Saber, which appeared in volume 52
of Building and Environment (Elsevier, 2012).
4
See ASTM STP 1116.
Part Three
Insulation’s Role in Controlling Noise
BY STACY FITZGERALD-REDD
Stacy Fitzgerald-Redd is the communications director for the

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association (NAIMA), an
industry source for energy efficiency, sustainable performance, and
the application and safety of fibreglass, rock wool, and slag wool
insulations. She has more than 20 years of association management
and communications experience. Fitzgerald-Redd may be contacted
at sfitzgerald-redd@naima.org.
Photos courtesy CertainTeed Corporation
Insulation’s Role in
Controlling Noise
Acoustical management is a challenge for both design professionals and building occupants.
A certain level of background sound within a building is expected, and generally contributes
to a pleasant ambient environment. Unwanted noise can cause occupants to feel irritable,
distracted, anxious, hostile, or annoyed. This is why it is critical to closely review the intended
use and design of commercial environments so sound levels do not become ‘noise’ concerns.
For example, within a factory work environment, anything beyond 85 decibels (dB)
over an eight-hour time period is considered hazardous and can lead to hearing loss,
according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).1
Construction practices to reduce noise are increasingly important, with many
builders and architects looking for cost-effective ways to further reduce sound
transmission. When properly installed within a wall, ceiling, or floor assembly,
fibreglass, rock, and slag wool insulation offers sound-absorbing benefits and reduce
unwanted noise in occupied spaces.
Where to begin
Building environments can be affected by multiple, noise competing sources both
inside and outside. For the first category, examples include traffic, lawn and garden
equipment; indoor sources include appliances and electronics. The result impedes
communication and makes focusing and communicating more difficult. In extreme
cases, noisy environments can contribute to hearing loss.
At the start of a building project, architects and designers consider use of the space
and potential noise sources, planning possible acoustical solutions for the project,
particularly when there is a special-use room (e.g. a sound studio or media room within
the building). An acoustical engineer can advise of the proper solutions to address any
potential problems with noise within a space.
In problem areas, this is best addressed at the onset of a project. While it is possible
to retrofit noise attenuation products after installation of building equipment, costs
are generally much higher—and the results are about half as effective—as designing
proper sound control into the system before the noise source is installed.
Acoustical insulation applications

Fibreglass and rock and slag wool insulations can help absorb sound travelling
through wall and floor assemblies. The acoustic enhancement insulation can be
installed in roof/ceiling applications, as well as interior or exterior wall applications
in wood or metal framing cavities for acoustic enhancement.
Additionally, acoustic insulation panels that are installed over hard surfaces help
reduce echo and improve sound clarity in gymnasiums, conference rooms, and concert
halls. These installations are manufactured to common stud widths and are slightly
wider than common stud spacing to accommodate easy friction-frit installations and
prevent sagging.
The basics of sound

Sound is energy travelling in waves that have both amplitude and frequency. Amplitude
relates to pressure and, to a large degree, affects loudness. Frequency relates to pitch
and affects how high or low a sound is. It is the intensity of sound (i.e. dB) with
which most people are familiar. A typical conversation in a normal speaking voice
measures about 60 dB and a power mower is approximately 107 dB.
Sound waves can travel through air, water, wood, masonry, or metal. Depending on
how it travels, sound is airborne or structure-borne. In the first case, it flows from
the source directly through the air. Structure-borne sound, on the other hand, travels
through solid materials, usually in direct mechanical contact with the sound source,
In office spaces without adequate insulation, it is not uncommon for productivity to drop when
employees can hear nearby conversations.
or from an impact on that material. For example, loud speakers on a floor vibrate this
sound that then becomes airborne, enabling people to hear it.
Dedicated noise-control solutions should address both airborne and structure-borne
sound by:
• replacing the sound source with a quieter one;
• blocking the sound or breaking the vibration path; or
• absorbing the sound with a light, porous material that soaks up sound waves.
The degree to which construction is effective at blocking noise is expressed as its
sound transmission loss (STL) value. These values are measured at each one-third
octave band frequency from 125 to 4000 Hz, and are expressed in dBs. STL values are
determined and measured in accordance with ASTM E90, Standard Test for Laboratory
Measure of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions and Elements.
From the sound transmission loss values, a single-number rating called the sound
transmission class (STC) is determined using ASTM E413, Classification for Rating
Sound Insulation.
Every newly built dwelling unit in Canada must be separated from other adjacent
units in a building by a separation wall, floor, or ceiling partition constructed to
provide an STC rating of at least 50, according to the National Building Code of
Canada (NBC).
Constructing walls to control noise

Sound transmission loss from one side of a wall to the other depends on a number of
design properties including the materials used and the properties of sound. Double-
wall assemblies effectively ‘break,’ or decouple, the vibration path within the wall
Photo courtesy Owens Corning
Acoustical batt insulation being installed in a wall.
assembly. As a result, most double-wall assemblies provide higher STC ratings

compared to single-layer walls.
The STC values of a lightweight wall can be increased as much as six to 10 STC
points by adding acoustical insulation to the stud cavity. Any gaps within the structure
should be sealed as any structure that leaks air also leaks sound.
In a multi-storey building, controlling sound transmission through ceilings/floors is
an important step to optimize occupant comfort. In addition to the STC rating, floor/
ceiling assemblies can be assigned an impact insulation class (IIC) rating based on
how well they perform at reducing structure-borne sound that comes from footsteps
or dropped objects as examples. Adding fibreglass or rock and slag wool insulation to
the joist cavity, along with a resilient ceiling structure below the joists, will increase
the STC and IIC ratings of a floor/ceiling construction assembly.
Noise control tips

When addressing a noise control problem, the first step is to investigate the source
of the noise to determine whether there is a simple solution to resolving the problem.
A particular noisy piece of equipment, for example, might need a simple adjustment
or repair to eliminate or reduce the noise. If this is not the case, the next step is to
measure the noise at its source, along its path and at the receiver or listener’s location.
Finally, once the noise source has been located, diagnosed, and measured, a solution
can be designed.
The noise reduction strategy may involve an acoustic treatment at more than
one location. For example, an acoustical enclosure of the noise source plus sound-
absorbing materials along the path may be the most effective and economical solution
to address the problem. Additionally, finding a solution to the noise control problem
may involve a treatment that provides both sound absorption and sound transmission
loss properties.
Walls, ceilings, and floors are key focal points for addressing noise problems, but
there are other sound control measures that can significantly reduce unwanted noise
in buildings including:
• insulating heating and air-conditioning ducts with fibreglass-lined sheet metal ducts;
• using double or triple-pane windows;
• adding solid doors in between rooms; or
• caulking around electrical boxes and underneath wall plates.
An added benefit of these measures is they also help increase the building’s energy
efficiency because air leaks throughout the building cause the HVAC system to work
harder to heat and cool the building.
Proposed changes to Canada’s National Building Code

The current standard for measuring the airborne sound transmission, International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15712.1, Airborne Sound and Insulation
Between Rooms, developed by the European Commission for Normalization, provides
a reliable estimate for some types of construction. However, it does not really apply for
the lightweight wood-framed construction commonly used for Canadian low-rise and
mid-rise buildings.
For lightweight framed construction, the Apparent Sound Transmission Class
(ASTC) method developed by ASTM is more suitable for measuring multiple paths
for sound transmission between adjacent rooms, because it considers not just direct
transmission through the separating assembly but also indirect transmission (i.e.
flanking) where sound passes over the top, or under the primary partition separating
two spaces through paths such as ceilings, walls, and floor surfaces.
A steering committee comprising Canadian building industry professionals has
developed recommendations for improving acoustics in Canadian buildings. The
recommendations, which are included in the 2015 NBC, are a shift from a focus of
individual assemblies (i.e. walls or floors) to a focus on complete system performance,
including direct and indirect south paths. Standardized procedures for calculating the
overall transmission, combined with standardized measurements to characterize sub-
assemblies, provide a much better prediction of sound transmission between adjacent
indoor spaces.
ISO 15712.1 uses laboratory test data for sub-assemblies such as walls and floors as
inputs for a detailed procedure to calculate the expected sound transmission between
adjacent rooms in a building. This standard works well for some types of construction,
but there are two obstacles to using it in North America:
• incompatibility with the ASTM standards used by the Canadian construction
industry; and
Photo courtesy Roxul
The insulated boards used in these theatre panels are covered in bass-trap acoustic-energy-absorbers.
• low accuracy of its predictions for lightweight wood or steel frame construction.
To bypass the limitations of ISO 15712.1, the recommendations seek to merge ASTM and
ISO test data in the ISO calculation procedure, and provide guidance for applying extended
measurement and calculation procedures for specific, common types of construction.
One can show compliance to the current minimum STC requirement in the
NBC using results from measurements carried out in accordance with ASTM
E90, Laboratory Measurements of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building
Partitions and Elements, or by conducting onsite measurements using ASTM E336,
Measurements of Airborne Sound Transmission Sound Attenuation between Rooms
in Buildings, or referencing assemblies cited in Appendix A, Table A-9.10.3.1 (wall
assemblies) or table A-9.10.3.1.B (floors). Better methods to measure sound will
facilitate enhanced acoustic performance for insulation in multi-unit structures.
Conclusion
The best strategy for optimizing acoustic comfort in dwelling units is to address all
the possible sound transmission paths in the architectural details so they can be
easily incorporated during construction. Identifying the location of noisy equipment,
incorporating a systems approach that allows consideration of all noise paths, sealing all
air leaks within the building, and considering all the sound transmission paths will help
avoid potential noise control problems within the building space and costly repairs.
Notes
1
For more information, visit www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noisecontrol.
Part Four
The Effect of Temperature
on Insulation Performance
BY CHRISTOPHER SCHUMACHER, M.A.SC.
Christopher Schumacher, M.A.Sc., is a principal with RDH Building

Science Laboratories, a consulting firm specializing in design
facilitation, enclosure commissioning, forensic investigation, and
training and communications. His presentations on temperature-
dependent R-values include the Westford Building Science
Symposium in 2011 and the Rock-toberfest Rockwool Symposium
in 2014. He has also written on this topic for buildingscience.com.
Images courtesy RDH Building Science Laboratories
The Effect of Temperature

on Insulation Performance
On the surface, R-value is a simple thing. In fact, it has become the standard metric of thermal
performance precisely because it is easy to explain and understand. Most insulation materials have
‘label R-values’ stamped on their faces (or at least displayed in large print on the packaging), but
these values do not tell the whole story of how insulation performs in service. Some complicating
factors—such as thermal bridging—have become fairly well-known. However, in order to meet
current needs for energy-efficient, durable, comfortable, and cost-effective buildings, it is critical
to continuously improve the industry’s understanding and handling of insulated assemblies.
Figure 1
Heat flow meter used to measure thermal conductivity

and resistance per ASTM C518, Standard Test Method for
Steady-state Thermal Transmission Properties by Means
of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus.
R-value is a measure of thermal resistance for materials. In other words, it denotes how
much heat is prevented from flowing through a layer of material at a given thickness.
In North America, R-value is most commonly given in imperial units, where one R = 1
(sf·F·hr)/Btu, and a 50-mm (2-in.) thick layer of insulation might be R-10. In Canada,
RSI units are also used; one RSI = 1 (m2·K)/W and RSI = R / 5.678, meaning the
50-mm thick layer of insulation would be RSI-1.76. Regardless of the units used, the
effectiveness of thermal resistance depends on a number of factors.
For example, temperature-dependent R-value is a phenomenon relatively unknown
outside of the world of researchers and academics. Temperature dependency refers
to changes in the R-value of insulation over a range of temperatures. For example, a
25-mm (1-in.) thick board of extruded polystyrene insulation (XPS) might have a label
R-value of RSI-0.88 (R-5), but its actual performance may be closer to RSI-0.97 (R-5.5)
under cold-climate winter conditions, or as low as RSI-0.72 (R-4.1) under hot-climate
summer conditions. The label R-value is not incorrect; it refers to performance under a
specific set of standard test conditions and does not necessarily reflect how a material
performs on a building.
Temperature dependency matters because the insulation in real-world buildings often
experiences temperatures differing significantly from standard test conditions. In fact,
the standard test condition temperatures are almost never seen in a typical building.
Research has characterized how R-values change with temperature by measuring
materials at different mean temperatures and using various temperature ranges.
Figure 2
The above tables provide a comparison of surface temperatures for ‘standard’

tests as per ASTM C1058, Standard Practice for Selecting Temperatures for
Evaluating and Reporting Thermal Properties of Thermal Insulation, versus
Building Science Laboratories’ (BSL’s) “Service Temperatures.”
This article describes an ongoing research project at RDH Building Science

Laboratories that has included a variety of insulation materials over several years. In
most cases, the insulation performed a little better than expected when the mean
temperature was lower (simulating cold outdoor conditions), and a little worse
when it was higher (simulating warm outdoor conditions). Further, the relationship
between R-value and temperature is nearly linear. Where this pattern occurs,
R-values are predictable and temperature can be easily accounted for. However,
some unusual patterns have also been found. Polyisocyanurate (polyiso) insulation
provides a useful example of how unusual temperature dependency patterns can be
identified and then accounted for in modelling and design.
Determining R-values
Before getting into the details of BSL’s research, it is important to understand the
origins of the R-value and how it is typically measured. The R-value was proposed
by Everett Shuman in the 1940s as an easy-to-compare, repeatable measure of
insulation performance. Prior to that, thermal performance was expressed in terms
of conductance or the ability for materials to conduct heat. Materials provide better
performance when they have lower thermal conductance. Industry decision-makers
felt consumers would be confused by the concept ‘smaller is better.’ When thermal
performance is expressed in terms of R-value or thermal resistance, higher numbers
represent better performance.
The R-value went on to become the de facto metric across North America, familiar to
both consumers and professionals. It has helped many designers and consumers make
more energy-efficient choices, but its importance in influencing purchase decisions
has also led to some unscrupulous marketing claims. In the aftermath of the 1970s
oil crisis in the United States, fraudulent R-value claims became so widespread the
United States Congress passed a consumer-protection law in response, the “Federal
Figure 3
These are R-values for several common insulation materials. Measured using
‘standard’ mean temperatures of –4, 4, 24, and 43 C (25, 40, 75, and 110 F),
and temperature difference of 27.8 C (50 F).
R-Value Rule” (16 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 460, “Trade Regulation Rule
Concerning the Labeling and Advertising of Home Insulation”).
Under this rule, claims about residential insulation must be based on specific ASTM
procedures. Of these, ASTM C177, Standard Test Method for Steady-state Heat Flux
Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-hot-plate
Apparatus, and ASTM C518, Standard Test Method for Steady-state Thermal Transmission
Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus, are by far the most commonly
used, as they can be quickly completed with small easy-to-handle samples—typically
between 305 x 305 mm (12 x 12 in.) and 609 x 609 mm (24 x 24 in.). These test methods
use an apparatus that places an air-impermeable hot and cold plate in direct contact
with the test sample (Figure 1, page 30). Further, the rule requires R-value tests be
conducted at a mean temperature of 24 C (75 F) and a temperature differential of 27.8 C
(50 F). For reasons of technical ease, this means insulation is usually tested with the
cold side at about 10 C (50 F), and the warm side at around 38 C (100 F).1
In other words, the label R-value typically only provides a metric of a material’s thermal
performance under one standard test condition. Clearly, the parameters of this one
test do not represent any typical combination of real indoor and outdoor temperature
conditions, much less the full range of conditions insulation might experience in building
applications.
Thermal performance
BSL’s research into temperature-dependant R-values started out by reproducing the
work of Mark Graham of the National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA).2 The
testing has since been extended to consider various insulation materials using a wider
range of realistic temperature conditions.
Figure 4
Change in R-value over time for extruded polystyrene (XPS), an insulation

material that employs insulating gases. Measured using ‘standard’ mean
temperatures of –4, 4, 24, and 43 C (25, 40, 75, and 110 F) and temperature
difference of 27.8 C (50 F).
Approach
Using ASTM C518 procedures, materials were tested at a range of hot and cold
temperatures. Initial tests were done at the same setpoints used by Graham. These
mean temperatures of –4, 4, 24, and 43 C (25, 40, 75, and 110 F), were per ASTM
C1058, Standard Practice for Selecting Temperatures for Evaluating and Reporting
Thermal Properties of Thermal Insulation (shown as the “Standard” R-value tests in
Figure 2, page 31).
For later tests, BSL researchers selected temperatures to reflect more realistic in-
service conditions, from cold, winter air temperatures through to hot, solar-heated
surface temperatures (see BSL “Service Temperature” tests in Figure 2).
Results
As expected (based on the physics of heat transfer), most of the tested insulating
materials exhibited nearly linear temperature dependency over the range of
temperatures buildings normally see.3 Results are given in Figure 3 (page 32) for
fibreglass batt, stonewool batt, high-density expanded polystyrene (EPS), XPS, and
closed-cell sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF).
Figure 4 shows results for nominal RSI-3.52 (R-20) XPS tested at two, four, six, and
44 months after purchase to investigate the effect of aging. For all these tests, the line’s
slope shows a consistent pattern where the material is more thermally resistant at
colder mean temperatures and less thermally resistant at warmer mean temperatures.
As most materials follow a consistent pattern, their temperature dependency can
be predicted and accommodated. Most of the time, a layer of the insulation can be
measured (i.e. get R-value or conductance) at several mean temperatures and then
material properties can be easily predicted (i.e. R-value/in. or conductivity). This process
Figure 5
R-values for several polyisocyanurate (polyiso) roof insulation materials.

Measured at BSL’s ‘Service Temperatures’—room side always at 22.2 C (72 F)
and outdoor side set to represent cold –17.7 C (0 F), cool 2.2 C (36 F), hot
42.2 C (108 F), and solar-heated surface 62.2 C (144 F) conditions.
works with standard and in-service temperatures—it should work with almost any
temperature difference.
However, it is possible for materials to have an unusual pattern of temperature
dependence. Graham demonstrated that polyiso insulation products (available at the
time of testing) displayed a markedly non-linear pattern over numerous samples from
different manufacturers. More specifically, the measured R-value was significantly
lower than the label R-value for tests conducted at both warm and cold temperatures.
In BSL testing, polyiso was tested more extensively to better understand this unusual
pattern of temperature dependency. Figure 5 shows the measured R-value of three
different polyisocyanurate products, tested in 100-mm (4-in.) thick samples—two
layers of 50-mm (2-in.) thick product—at BSL’s ‘service temperatures.’
It should be noted the results in Figure 5 are only applicable to the specific thickness
and temperatures tested—in this case, 100 mm (4 in.) at an indoor temperature of 22 C
(72 F) and outdoor temperatures between –18 and 62 C (0 and 144 F).
Researchers at BSL have since developed a draft test method to fully quantify the
R-value for materials having unusual temperature dependence. The method produces
a temperature-dependent R-value curve independent of thickness. Figure 6 (page 35)
presents an example of such a curve for several different materials. Using this approach,
the temperature-dependent R-value can be quantified once, over a range of temperatures,
for a given insulation product. The results can then be extended to predict the R-value of
the product at any thickness and temperature.
Understanding design implications of temperature dependency

In and of itself, temperature dependency is not a reason to avoid a particular type of
insulation. Polyisocyanurate insulation has been used as an example in this discussion
Figure 6
Convergent R-values measured to capture full temperature dependence of several

common insulation materials. These are measured using decreasing temperature
difference measurements at 16 mean temperatures.
because it exhibits an unusual relationship between R-value and temperature, and

because it is commonly used in commercial roof and residential wall assemblies. Like
all insulation materials, polyiso has pros and cons.
It should also be remembered all materials exhibit some temperature dependence.
When temperature-dependant thermal performance is not taken into account, three
problems can result:
• increased energy consumption;
• poor occupant comfort; and
• reduced building durability.
A useful example can be found with a large warehouse or light industrial building
in a climate with hot summers. If the lighting and equipment loads are moderate,
ventilation requirements are minimal, and there are few windows, then much of the
cooling load will be associated with gains through the roof assembly. When the roof
insulation is exposed to higher temperatures (as would be typical under a solar-heated
roof surface), it delivers lower thermal performance (i.e. more heat gain) than expected
based on the label R-value. This is true for all types of insulation material.
At the exterior surface the R-value might be reduced by 20 per cent. However, over
the thickness of the roof insulation the average reduction in R-value might only be 10
per cent since the exterior layers protect the inner layers by keeping them closer to the
indoor temperature.
The corresponding increase in heat flow would result in an approximate 10 per cent
increase in energy consumption related to the roof assembly. Whether or not this has
a significant impact on building operating costs will depend on the specific climate,
Figure 7
Predicted temperature profile and condensing plane temperature

for a typical residential wall assembly insulated with 19-mm (3⁄4-in.)
polyiso exterior insulation and 89-mm (3 1⁄2-in.) mineral fibre batt
insulation in the stud space—assuming label R-values.
the building construction and operation, and various other interrelated factors
(e.g. thermal mass and equipment efficiency).
It was stated earlier most materials exhibit a decrease in R-value for hot temperatures,
and an increase in R-value for cold temperatures. It seems obvious to ask whether
any unexpected increase in energy consumption during warm weather is offset by
unexpected reductions in consumption during cold periods. Again, the net performance
will depend on specific climate, building construction, operation, and other issues. All
the relevant factors (including insulation temperature dependence) can be accounted
for using appropriate computer models (e.g. EnergyPlus and WUFI-Plus).4
Even in those cases where the summer loss in performance is offset by the
winter bonus, there may be other building performance considerations. Several
design questions might be considered: will the brief reduction in R-value have
a meaningful impact on the required HVAC system capacity? If not, does it result in
interior surface temperatures that adversely affect thermal comfort?
Further, temperature dependence does not always result in better performance
under colder temperatures. The tested polyiso insulation materials exhibited lower
than expected R-values at higher and lower temperatures. For some time, polyiso
board insulation has been the most commonly used low-slope roof insulation. In
these applications, it is the only insulation in the assembly—as a result, the thermal
performance is less than expected during both winter and summer conditions.
Figure 8

for a residential wall assembly insulated with 19-mm (3⁄4-in.) polyiso
exterior insulation and 89-mm (3 1⁄2-in.) mineral fibre batt insulation
in the stud space—using measured temperature-dependant R-values.
Polyisocyanurate is also increasingly being used as a continuous exterior insulation

over insulated stud spaces in residential and commercial wall assemblies. In these
applications, the thickness of a continuous insulation is typically specified to:
• minimize the impact of thermal bridging through the framing; and
• reduce the potential for air leakage condensation by controlling condensing plane
temperatures.5
The former is an energy consideration while the latter is a building durability concern.
For a practical illustration, a residential wall assembly with a 2x4 wood frame with
RSI-2.29 (R-13) fibreglass batt insulation in the stud space and 19 mm (3⁄4 in.) of
polyiso insulation on the exterior provides a nice example.
Assuming the polyisocyanurate insulation is rated as RSI 1.06/25 mm (R-6/in.), without
accounting for temperature dependency, if the wall is subjected to conditions of 22 C
(72 F) on the indoor side and –18 C (0 F) on the outdoor side, then the temperature at the
condensing plane (i.e. the inside surface of the polyisocyanurate) is predicted to be –8.5 C
(17 F), as illustrated in Figure 7 (page 36).
In contrast, if it is assumed the polyiso exhibits a temperature dependence similar to
that shown in Figure 6, then the predicted condensing plane temperature will be –12.1 C
(10 F) as illustrated in Figure 8. In this case, the temperature dependence of the
material is particularly significant because the entire thickness of the insulation is on
Figure 9

for a typical residential wall assembly insulated with 38-mm polyiso
exterior insulation and 89-mm mineral fibre batt insulation in the
stud space—using measured temperature-dependant R-values.
the assembly’s cold side. That is to say none of the temperature-sensitive insulation
is protected by itself or another material. To bring the condensing plane temperature
back to the values originally expected, the thickness of the polyiso exterior insulation
would need to be be increased to 38 mm (11⁄2 in.), as illustrated in Figure 9.
Specifying more insulation is also a good option when designing roof
assemblies using polyisocyanurate. A good rule of thumb for both roofs and
walls is to use NRCA’s recommendation to specify polyisocyanurate insulation
by its desired thickness—not its label R-value. Ideally, the thickness would be
specified on the basis of annual energy simulations and hygrothermal calculations
using a measured temperature-dependant R-value like that illustrated in
Figure 6 (page 37). When material-specific, temperature-dependant R-values are
unavailable, designers will have to make some assumptions. For polyisocyanurate
roof insulation materials, NRCA recommends using an in-service R-value of 5 per inch
thickness (i.e. RSI-0.88/25 mm) for heating-dominated climates or 5.6 per inch thickness
(i.e. RSI-0.99/25 mm) for cooling-dominated climates.6
Another option is to use a hybrid insulation approach. Adding a layer of less-
temperature-sensitive insulation outboard of the polyiso, protects the polyiso from
extreme temperatures and gets the most value from both insulation layers. An
example hybrid assembly is shown in Figure 10 (page 39).
Figure 10
A hybrid assembly using rigid mineral fibre and polyiso insulation.
Conclusion
Temperature dependence can result in assemblies that do not function as expected or
intended. In the case of those materials exhibiting strong temperature dependence, the
consequences could be significant. Fortunately there are solutions, and as knowledge of
this phenomena increases, more solutions will no doubt be developed.
Notes
1
The actual language of the rule permits test temperature differentials of 27.8 C ± 5.6 C
(50 F ± 10 F) for cold-side temperatures of 7.2 to 12.7 C (45 to 55 F) and hot-side
temperatures of 35 to 40 C (95 to 105 F).
2
See Mark Graham’s “Comparing Polyiso Values,” in National Roofing Contractors
Association’s (NRCA’s) Tech Today at docserver.nrca.net/technical/8020.pdf.
3
If the temperatures were extended to cryogenic temperatures on the cold end and
furnace temperatures as seen in industrial applications, then the relationship would
be seen to be curved. However, the part of the curve that represents normal building
temperatures can be treated as linear for practical purposes.
4
It should be noted the assumed temperature-dependent R-values (i.e. in the program
database) may not be correct for all materials (e.g. polyiso). More material-specific data
is needed.
5
In walls with sufficient exterior insulation, the dewpoint temperature of the interior air
will be below the temperature of the back of sheathing, and therefore condensation due
to air leakage cannot occur within the studspace. See John Straube’s BSD 163, Controlling
Cold-Weather Condensation Using Insulation. Available at buildingscience.com.
6
See Mark Graham’s “Revised R-values” in NRCA’s Tech Today, at docserver.nrca.net/
technical/9599.pdf.
Part Five
Thermal Barriers and the Protection
of Foamed Plastic
BY JOHN A. DALTON
John A. Dalton is the task group chair of the ASTM E06.21

committee on serviceability and a principal member of the U.S.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 502, Standard for Road
Tunnels, Bridges, and Other Limited Access Highways. The technical
service manager for W.R. Grace & Co.’s fire protection products
division, he has degrees in mathematics and industrial chemistry.
Dalton can be reached at john.a.dalton@grace.com.
Photo courtesy W. R. Grace & Co.
Thermal Barriers
and the Protection of
Foamed Plastic
In Canada, products approved for use as a thermal barrier for foamed plastic must pass either
CAN4-S124-M, Standard Method of Test for the Evaluation of Protective Coverings for Foamed
Plastics, or CAN/ULC-S101, Standard Methods of Fire Endurance Tests of Building Construction and
Materials, to comply with the National Building Code of Canada (NBC).
Figure 1
Images courtesy Canadian Urethane Foam

Contractors Association (CUFCA)
The assembly for CAN/ULC S124, Standard Method of Test for the Evaluation of
Protective Coverings for Foamed Plastics, for thermal barrier material over sprayed
polyurethane foam.
In the Canadian market, many products—typically fibre-based or cementitious

materials—can meet these requirements. Unfortunately, there has been a growing
trend amongst some suppliers of ‘paintable’ ignition barriers claiming their products
meet the performance of a thermal barrier without actually passing either CAN4-
S124-M or CAN/ULC-S101. This article provides the background on the qualities of
acceptable solutions as a thermal barrier in accordance to the NBC, and discusses the
current activities in the marketplace and the potential liability to the design/construction
team and authority having jurisdiction (AHJ).
NBC test criteria for protecting foamed plastics

Sprayed polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation is combustible and may ignite when
exposed to heat or fire. During the event of a fire, smoke and combustible gases
can accumulate in interior, confined spaces and lead to a deadly flashover.1 These
characteristics of foamed plastics are recognized within the NBC, which details the steps
to be taken to protect building inhabitants from the effects of the materials’ burning.
The code specifically defines certain materials to be used as “thermal barriers” for
foamed plastic insulation. These include gypsum board thicker than 12.7 mm (1/2 in.),
concrete, and masonry. For other materials (that are not specifically identified), NBC
stipulates testing/performance requirements to determine whether the material may
be used as a thermal barrier. It splits this approval process into three categories
based upon the flame spread rating of the foamed plastic insulation and details of the
proposed building. Each category has its own testing requirements and pass/fail criteria.
As mentioned, the NBC includes testing thermal barriers according to CAN4-S124-M
and/or CAN/ULC-S101—both standards use the same time-versus-temperature fire
curve, but differ in the required sample size, orientation to the fire, number and
location of thermocouples, and pass/fail criteria.
Figure 2
Thermocouple positions for the thermal barrier material test in CAN/ULC S101,
Standard Methods of Fire Endurance Tests of Building Construction and Materials.
More importantly, with both standards, NBC requires the testing agency measure the
temperatures at the interface of the foam plastic and thermal barrier. There have been
recorded situations where tests have been run with the thermocouples on the backside of
the assembly or with the thermocouples buried in the foam. Neither of these conditions
would meet the requirements of NBC or the test standards mentioned above. The code is
very clear in this respect.
In the first category, NBC, in 3.1.5.12 (titled “Combustible Insulation and its Protection”),
allows for the use of a thermal barrier based on certain criteria. In a building required
to be of noncombustible construction, foamed plastic insulation having a flame-spread
rating not more than 25 is permitted, provided the insulation is protected from adjacent
space in the building by a thermal barrier that meets the requirements of classification
B when tested in conformance with CAN/ULC S124. As a general rule, if one can see
foamed plastic insulation in the conditioned space of a building, it is a code violation.
This is a small-scale test, with an exposed surface area of 0.49 m2 (5.3 sf), requiring
temperature measurements at the interface of the thermal barrier and the foamed
plastic. Purely a thermal transmission test, it measures the effectiveness of the thermal
barrier to insulate the foamed plastic from heat and fire. The test must be run in a
horizontal orientation. The material is exposed to a fire that reaches 700 C (1290 F)
after 10 minutes (Figure 1, page 42).
Despite its small size, it is accepted as a severe test and one that provides an accurate
measure of a thermal barrier’s effectiveness. Organizations such as ULC and Intertek
indicate if a material has a Classification B rating based on CAN/ULC-S124. For a
Classification B rating, the temperature rise at the interface of the tested thermal
barrier material and the foamed plastic insulation cannot exceed an average of 140 C
(252 F) for all the thermocouples or a maximum rise of 180 C (324 F) at any single
thermocouple for 10 minutes (Figure 2, page 43).
In the second and third categories, for buildings sprinklered throughout or 18 m (59 ft)
or shorter (from grade to the floor level of the top storey), NBC requires a thermal barrier
tested to CAN/ULC S124 for foamed plastic insulation having flame spread ratings
between 25 and 500 if the building is sprinklered throughout, or not more than 18 m
(59 ft) from grade to the floor level of the top storey. Otherwise, as in for taller buildings
or those without sprinklers, thermal barriers must be tested to CAN/ULC-S101. This is
a full-scale test, larger than CAN/ULC S124, requiring an exposed surface of 9.3 m2 (100
sf) that can be run in both horizontal and vertical orientations to evaluate the intended
orientation of the thermal barrier. As per Section 3.1.5.12 of the 2012 NBC, it establishes
whether a material qualifies as a thermal barrier as follows:
2. Combustible insulation having a flame-spread rating of more than 25 but not more than 500
is permitted in the exterior walls of a building required to be of noncombustible construction,
provided the insulation is protected by a thermal barrier that, when tested in conformance
with CAN/ULC-S101 will not develop an average temperature rise of more than 140 C or
a maximum temperature rise more than 180 C at any point on its unexposed face [(i.e. the
unexposed face of the thermal barrier, which is the interface of the foam and the thermal
barrier)] within 10 minutes.
3. Combustible insulation, having a flame-spread rating of more than 25 but not more than
500 on any exposed surface, or any surface that would be exposed by cutting through the
material in any direction, is permitted in the interior walls, within ceilings and within roof
assemblies of a building required to be of noncombustible construction, provided the insulation
is protected from adjacent space in the building by a thermal barrier that, when tested in
conformance with CAN/ULC-S101 will not develop an average temperature rise of more than
140 C or a maximum temperature rise of more than 180 C at any point on its unexposed face
within 20 minutes, and will remain in place for not less than 40 minutes.
In addition to testing potential thermal barrier properties, CAN/ULC-S101 is primarily

used to test the fire resistance of assemblies. However, for this type of testing, the
thermocouples (and, therefore, temperature measurements) are located on the
unexposed side of the assembly (Figure 3, page 45). This approach is different than
what is used to assess a material’s effectiveness as a thermal barrier. The use of CAN/
ULC-S101 in this fashion cannot be employed to approve thermal barriers because in
this test procedure the thermocouples are not at the interface of the foam and thermal
barrier as required by the National Building Code.
Current market situation

Until recently, thermal barriers have typically been one of two types—fibre-based or
cementitious. These products protect the foamed plastic from fire, while also providing
Image courtesy CUFCA Figure 3
CAN/ULC S101 thermocouple position for fire resistance wall assembly test.
physical protection for the foam from abuse, allowing for longer in-place service life.
Many of these materials have a long and successful track record, and are listed with
testing agencies such as ULC, Intertek, and QAI, passing many CAN/ULC S124 or CAN/
ULC-S101 tests as thermal barriers.
Recently, this author has seen unfounded claims by companies marketing paintable
ignition barriers that are certified for use in Canada as thermal barriers. These products
are often intumescents—typically, ammonium polyphosphate-based—which begin the
intumescing process at 240 C (464 F), which is higher than the maximum allowable
temperature limits of the code. (In other words, they begin their protective actions
too late.) Unfortunately, in most cases, these companies have attempted to confuse
the marketplace by intentionally running fire tests where the thermocouples were not
properly located to comply with NBC.
For example, in some cases, a single material was tested using CAN/ULC-S101 with
the thermocouples on the unexposed side of the assembly, behind the wallboard. This
procedure is appropriate for qualifying a wall assembly, but cannot be used to qualify
a material as a thermal barrier (i.e. because such a process requires the thermocouples
to be at the interface of the thermal barrier and the foam).
Another inappropriate test had the thermocouples buried within the foam, which
obviously does not meet the code. When this information was brought to the attention
of one of the manufacturers that had run tests where thermocouples were not placed in
accordance to the NBC requirements, the company stated it did not think the material
would pass as a thermal barrier when using the required thermocouple placement.
In addition to erroneously promoting products with claims their products are
certified for use in Canada, some companies have been supplying results from testing
in the United States done in accordance to UL 1715, Fire Test of Interior Finish Material—a
completely different and less severe test method that does not meet NBC requirements.
Thankfully, there has recently been the introduction of certain intumescent paints
that do pass the CAN/ULC S124 test. By meeting the requirements of the test, these
companies have negated the argument the CAN/ULC S124 test is too severe to act as a
test method for intumescent thermal barriers.
Further, there exists in Canada a process whereby developers of new materials may
use the Canadian Construction Materials Centre (CCMC) to demonstrate compliance
with the requirements of NBC or provincial/territorial building codes. Regretfully, this
author has seen engineering judgments appearing to ‘okay’ the use of intumescent
thermal barriers. In some instances, the claims made have been factually incorrect;
in others, the basis for approvals have been the alternate method for code compliance
provisions, given in 1.2 of Division A of NBC where compliance with the code can be
achieved by meeting a prescriptive test or by showing through performance testing a
product meets the objectives of the prescriptive code section.
Considering the wide variety of thermal barriers choices now available, can one really
state the alternate, but untested, product is as good as or better than those products
currently available? This author does not believe such a claim can be made, especially
when code-compliant test processes are available at a reasonable cost.
Contractor liability
Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the installer of the thermal barrier and the AHJ
to provide and approve products conforming to the relevant provincial building code.
Unfortunately, the contractor may also be held liable if he or she installs a product that
does not conform to the applicable standard—even when the building inspector has
incorrectly accepted products that do not meet the intent of the NBC. Architects and
specifiers could also face legal liability, to say nothing of the moral issues for design
professionals.
Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) documents suggest, it is
the responsibility of the prime consultant to include in the contract documents the
criteria required for the constructor to comply with the code requirements. It is the
constructor’s responsibility to provide the work in compliance with the contract
documents and the code.2 That said, the constructor is not responsible to verify the
contract documents are in compliance with the code. The constructor may be liable if
it installs a material not in compliance with the contract documents, or if it proposes
a substitution material that does not meet the code requirements. The reality is all
parties involved risk some legal liability, to say nothing of the moral issues.
To avoid any unnecessary liability, the specifications should request a submittal of
a letter from the manufacturer stating the material being supplied has been tested
in accordance with the requirements of the National Building Code (item 3.1.5.12) and
passed its criteria established for a thermal barrier. One should also ask for the test
Photo courtesy W. R. Grace & Co.
Preparing the foam for a CAN/ULC S101 wall test.
report that supports the requested letter. There are many products in the market that
have successfully passed the NBC criteria as thermal barriers; selecting and using a
product that has not met these criteria would be taking on unnecessary liability, and is
a threat to life safety.
The fire protection industry (including manufacturers, engineers, architects,
and the contractor community) has a duty to provide the public with a reasonable
level of safety in buildings in compliance with the applicable building codes. It is the
responsibility of all parties to perform their due diligence to ensure public safety is not
put at undue risk. Accepting only code-conforming materials is an important aspect in
the process.
Notes
1
A flashover fire occurs when the temperature in an area is high enough to ignite all
flammable material simultaneously. This is usually created by a high concentration of
gases within the atmosphere. Once that temperature has been reached, any ignition
source will create a sudden explosion of fire throughout the area.
2
For more info, see CCDC 2-2008, Stipulated Price Contract, CCDC 5A-2010, Construction
Management Contract–For Services, and CCDC 5B-2010, Construction Management Contract–
For Services and Construction.
Get your products speciﬁed with Canada’s digital product source. Your products are served
within context of Construction Canada’s technical and trusted editorial on
www.constructioncanada.net.
Visitor searches thermal

and moisture protection
Related products are

served in context
Rate of $100/month (per product) build your Product Portfolio now!
Your Product Portfolio Includes:

1. Promotion on Construction
Canada’s Home Page.
2. Promotion on the Features Page
which serves related products to
users, driving relevant trafﬁc to
your listing!
3. Promotion on the Products Section
which is searchable by MasterFormat/
UniFormat and keyword.
HERE’S WHAT YOU NEED:

• Headline up to 10 words
• Up to 200 words of text
• One product image (GIF, JPEG, PNG, 72 dpi,
max 500 kb)
• Up to 5 hyperlinks (product spec sheets,
catalogue, video, etc.)
• Contact info (telephone, e-mail, website)
www.constructioncanada.net/productportal

Insulation Ebook PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Insulation Ebook PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Thermal Moisture Protection:

The information and contents in this publication are believed by the

© 2015 Kenilworth Media Inc. All rights reserved.

Jared O. Blum is the president of the Polyisocyanurate Insulation

Steel Framing Continuous

In American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)

Function and versatility

CONTINUOUS INSULATION RVALUE PER INCH

Examples of minimum R-value per inch for common types of continuous

Polyiso and continuous insulation

Modern energy code requirements

Building code requirements

Wind pressure resistance

Cladding (siding) attachment

ASHRAE 90.1 2010  RESIDENTIAL

Continuous insulation minimizes thermal bridging and provides economic

Moisture vapour retarders

BY DAVID W. YARBROUGH, PHD, PE

David W. Yarbrough, PhD, PE,is vice-president of R&D Services,

RSI for 20-mm Air Gap

RSI for 40-mm Air Gap

Double-layer bubblepack • same applications as single bubblepack

• installed in wall cavities, between floor joists, between rafters in attics,

Therefore, the development of a specification for a specific project should take

E = 1/(1/εcold + 1/εhot – 1) (1)

RSI = ΔT / (Q rad + Q convection-conduction)

Qrad = E · σ · ([Thot + 273.15]4 – [Tcold + 273.15]4)

Qconvection-conduction = Nu · ( λ air · ΔT /L)

ΔTair gap = ΔTtotal · RSI air gap / RSI total

RSI air gap = ΔTair gap · RSI total / ΔT total

Exterior Cladding or Stucco

B Exterior Cladding or Stucco

Exterior OSB Sheathing

Photo courtesy Covertech Fabricating

Fibreglass-reflective insulation hybrid. Reflective duct installation.

Hybrid insulation assemblies

Reflective duct insulation

Stacy Fitzgerald-Redd is the communications director for the

Acoustical insulation applications

The basics of sound

Constructing walls to control noise

Acoustical batt insulation being installed in a wall.

assembly. As a result, most double-wall assemblies provide higher STC ratings

Noise control tips

Proposed changes to Canada’s National Building Code

BY CHRISTOPHER SCHUMACHER, M.A.SC.

Christopher Schumacher, M.A.Sc., is a principal with RDH Building

The Effect of Temperature

Heat flow meter used to measure thermal conductivity

The above tables provide a comparison of surface temperatures for ‘standard’

This article describes an ongoing research project at RDH Building Science

Change in R-value over time for extruded polystyrene (XPS), an insulation

R-values for several polyisocyanurate (polyiso) roof insulation materials.

Understanding design implications of temperature dependency

Convergent R-values measured to capture full temperature dependence of several

because it exhibits an unusual relationship between R-value and temperature, and

Predicted temperature profile and condensing plane temperature

Predicted temperature profile and condensing plane temperature

Polyisocyanurate is also increasingly being used as a continuous exterior insulation

Predicted temperature profile and condensing plane temperature

A hybrid assembly using rigid mineral fibre and polyiso insulation.

John A. Dalton is the task group chair of the ASTM E06.21

Images courtesy Canadian Urethane Foam