UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA

PV POWER TO METHANE

Draft Assignment 2

GROUP 12

GROUP PERSONNEL:
ALI HAMDANI (1506743662)
ARDIANSAH (1506673523)
ATHA HAMZAH (1506673366)
JIHAN MUTIAH (1506673201)
SABIQ MUFARRID (1506730981)

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
OCTOBER 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ii Universitas Indonesia
 LIST OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................... ii
LIST OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................... iii
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................. v
CHAPTER 1 HEAT EXCHANGER NETWORKING ..................................... 1
1.1 Steam Classification ................................................................................. 1
1.2 Problem Table and Cascade ..................................................................... 2
1.3 Pinch Design Method ............................................................................... 2
1.4 PFD ........................................................................................................... 3
CHAPTER 2 UTILITY ........................................................................................ 4
2.1 Water Utility ............................................................................................. 4
2.2 Steam Utility............................................................................................. 4
2.3 Electricity Utility ...................................................................................... 4
2.4 Comparison of Pre-HEN and Post-HEN .................................................. 4
CONCULSION...................................................................................................... 5
REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 6

iii Universitas Indonesia

 LIST OF TABLES

das

iv Universitas Indonesia
LIST OF FIGURES

v Universitas Indonesia
 CHAPTER 1
HEAT EXCHANGER NETWORKING

After designing the overall of methane plant, the next step is designing the
heat recovery system. A good heat recovery system from the processes is achieved
by a using heat exchanger effectively. The heat exchangers are needed to combine
in a heat exchanger networking to distribute the available hot streams in the most
effective way. Heat Exchanger Network (HEN) is used to achieve an optimal
energy economization. HEN is a successful way to minimize energy consumption.
HEN will decrease the demand of utilities by re-using heat from flows in this
methane plant. By the use of HEN, a large amount of utility costs such as the costs
of steam and cooling water, as well as the costs of heaters and coolers can be saved.
1.1 Stream Classification
The first thing in starting analyze heat exchanger is to identify streams in
this methane plant. The author need to classify the cold stream and the hot stream
which have a temperature change.in the methane plant. Hot stream is a stream
whose temperature decreases, and cold stream is a stream whose temperature
increases. The identification focuses on the main process streams which use utility
stream both cold and hot utility. The identification and classification is shown in
table below.
Table 1.1 Stream Classification in Methane Plant

Stream Stream Tin Tout ∆H CP

No. Type
In Out (℃) (℃) (kW) (kW/℃)
1 80 250 COLD 219.070 1.2886
2 250 45 HOT 1190.277 5.8062
3 70 109.3 COLD 17.612 0.4448
4 142.2 70 HOT 86.690 1.2006
5 30 80 COLD 192.311 3.8462
(source: The Author’s Personal Data)
From table 1.1, there are three cold stream and two hot streams. Even tough, the
reaction of the plant is exothermic and produces so much heat. H is the heat flow
of the stream. Since there is no mechanical work in heat exchanger

1 Universitas Indonesia
 2
1.2 Problem Table and Cascade
There are two methods that can be used to determine energy target. Those
are the composite curve and the problem table cascade. In this assignment, problem
table cascade is preferred since it has no dependency on how accurate someone read
a curve and might cause some errors. The problem table cascade is a more
appropriate tool to understand the interface between the process and the utility
system.
The process is making the cascade diagram which is divided into
temperature intervals in the same way as was done for construction of the composite
curves. To calculate with the cascade diagram, the first step is to determine the
shifted temperature intervals (T*) from actual supply and target temperatures. The
author need to define the value of ΔTmin. The common value of ΔTmin used for
general plant is 10°C. Usually for LNG plant, ΔTmin, is smaller than 10. Yet,
because of this plant is counted as general plant, thus, used 10°C. So after that, the
author can defined the shifted temperature which is used in this method. The shifted
temperature intervals is ΔTmin/2. The cold fluid is added by 5°C and the hot fluid is
subtracted by 5°C because the ΔTmin = 10°C.
Table 1.2 Stream Classification in Methane Plant
Tin Tout T*in T*out
Stream Type
(℃) (℃) (℃) (℃)
1 COLD
2 HOT
3 COLD
4 HOT
5 COLD
(source: The Author’s Personal Data)

1.3 Pinch Design Method

There is a parameter called pinch temperature which is the key of pinch
design method in Cascade Table. So, after the Cascade Table is done, the Pinch
design method can be created. Besides pinch temperature, (F.Cp)hot and (F.Cp)cold
2

Universitas Indonesia
 3
should be known as an evaluation of Heat Exchanger Networking. The rule of
thumb is, when the stream in the near above pinch temperature, the networking
stream can be created between hot and cold stream if (F.Cp)hot ≤ (F.Cp)cold. And
when the stream is near below the pinch temperature, the networking stream can be
created between hot and cold stream if (F.Cp)hot ≥ (F.Cp)cold. The purpose of this
method is to optimize and networking each stream energy, so the needed utility of
the plan can be lower than before.
1.4 PFD

Universitas Indonesia
 CHAPTER 2
UTILITY

2.1 Water Utility

2.2 Steam Utility
2.3 Electricity Utility
2.4 Comparison of Pre-HEN and Post-HEN

4 Universitas Indonesia
 CONCULSION

dasf

5 Universitas Indonesia
 6
REFERENCES

Abbas, Z., Mezher, T. & Abu-Zahra, M. R. M., 2013. Evaluation of CO2

Purification Requirements and the Selection of Processes for Impurities
Deep Removal from the CO2 Product Stream. Energy Procedia, Volume
37, pp. 2389-2396.
BPH Migas, 2014. Neraca Gas Bumi Nasional. [Online]
Available at: http://www.bphmigas.go.id/neraca-gas-bumi-nasional
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
BPH Migas, 2017. Wilayah Jaringan Distribusi. [Online]
Available at: http://www.bphmigas.go.id/wilayah-jaringan-distribusi
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
Brayer, C., 2011. Hybrid PV-Wind Renewable Power Methane Plants, Berlin: 6th
Internanional Renewable Energy Storage Conference.
Catur, E., 2016. Makalah Mengenai SUTET untuk mendukung STL. [Online]
Available at: http://erfancatur.blogspot.com/2016/05/makalah-mengenai-
sutet-untuk-mendukung.html
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
Chandra, A. A., 2018. Bagaimana Perkembangan Terkini Proyek 35.000 MW?.
[Online]
Available at: https://finance.detik.com/energi/d-4035622/bagaimana-
perkembangan-terkini-proyek-35000-mw
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
cheresources, n.d. Purification of Waste Carbon Dioxide from Ethylene. [Online]
Available at: cheresources.com
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
Ghaib, K. & Ben-Fares, F.-Z., 2018. PV-to-Methane: A State-of-Art Review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, pp. 433-446.
Haryadi, E., 2015. Seminar Nasional Ketenagalistrikan dan Aplikasinya: Program
Pengembangan Pembangkit 35000 MW dan Kesiapan Infrastruktur Sistem
Jawa-Bali, Bandung: PT PLN (Persero) P3B Jawa Bali.

Universitas Indonesia
 7
Kuznecova, I., 2017. Property Based Ranking of CO and CO2 Methanation
Catalyst, Latvia: Energy Procedia.
Lidya, M., S. & Caroline, S., 2013. Laporan Kerja Praktek PT. Polychem Indonesia
Tbk. Divisi Kimia - Merak, Bandung: Program Studi Teknik Kimia, Fakultas
Teknologi Industri, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan.
Respati, R. S., 2016. Indonesian Market Potentials for Energy Efficient Buildings.
[Online]
Available at: https://www.german-energy-
solutions.de/GES/Redaktion/DE/Audioslidehows/2016/Indonesien/Vortra
g4/vortrag04.html
[Accessed 20 September 2018].
Rumbayan, M., Abudureyimu, A. & Nagasaka, K., 2012. Mapping of Solar Energy
Potential in Indonesia Using Artificial Neural Network and Geographical
Information System. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
16(2012), pp. 1437-1449.
Solargis, 2017. Solar Resource and Photovoltaic Potential of Indonesia,
Washington: The World Bank.
Songolzadeh, M., Soleimani, M., Ravanchi, M. T. & Songolzadeh, R., 2014.
Carbon Dioxide Separation from Flue Gases: A Technological Review
Emphasizing in Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Scientific World Journal,
Volume 2014.
US Geological Survey, 1998. The Erosion of Carbonate Stone. [Online]
Available at:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_Crystal/erosion/indexB.html
[Accessed 12 September 2018].
Weiland, R. H., Hatcher, N. A. & Nava, J. L., 2010. AMP for Carbon Capture?.
[Online]
Available at:
http://www.digitalrefining.com/article/1000876,AMP_for_carbon_capture
_.html#.W6YI1GgzbIU
[Accessed 18 September 2018].

Universitas Indonesia
 8
White, C. W., 2002. ASPEN Plus Simulation of CO2 Recovery Process,
Morgantown, West Virginia: EG&G Technical Services, Inc..
Widodo, T., 2018. A Long-Run Estimation of Natural Gas Demand in Indonesian
Manufacturing Sector: Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach,
Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Universitas Indonesia