Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Rebecca Nappi
NUR4240-201617-SP
while also being in lithotomy position. This creates a unique challenge for the operating room
staff to position the patient in a way that will prevent any nerve damage and keep the patient
from sliding off the top of the bed while keeping the entire abdomen and perineum fully exposed
for the surgeon to operate. There have been many advances in patient positioners over the years
but many of these products become very expensive when using only one per patient. This type of
cost is not something you can bill the patient for but rather is part of the overall operating room
cost to have surgery. This detail is why my hospital desire to keep the cost of the product as low
Process
I am the robotic and gynecology team lead for St. Francis operating room. This position
allows me to be present during many surgeries requiring steep Trendelenburg positioning. I have
firsthand experience with patients moving on the operating room table during a 5-6 hour surgery
requiring head down positioning. It can cause very serious injuries, from trocars in the abdomen
tearing tissue, skin tears on the patient’s back or shoulder to even nerve damage from pressure
areas (Kilic, Ertan, & Kose, 2014). I first gathered my initial data from surgeries I was the
circulator in. I then contacted other hospitals in the area to ask them what they use and why. I
also contacted the rep for these products that were being used and asked them to send me data on
patient safety. I also looked up AORN (association of operating room nurses) standards and
recommendations to gather further information (Hortman & Chung, 2015). One challenge I
encountered during this process was finding accurate pricing due to contracts with companies
NON-SLIP PADS DURING SURGERIES REQUIRING 3
making the pricing vary so much. Overall, between the internet, my nurse manager and reps from
Presentation
Finding pictures that accurately represent the items in consideration for presentation was
a little difficult. Deciding which areas to focus on for direct reasoning for wanting this change
was difficult for me because I sometimes get bogged down with too many details instead of just
focusing on one or two main topics. For example, infection prevention is my main reason for
suggesting this improvement but I got distracted with pricing and then the appearance of the
different pads for patient satisfaction which took me away from the focus of infection prevention
which the surgeons I am presenting to will care the most about when considering a change.
Reflection
The main take away lesson for me from doing this project was realizing what goes into a
product change or a process improvement. The staff griping and expressing their opinions about
how it causes extra steps for them was very difficult for me to handle. The patient is the only one
that counts and if a product helps a patient then each team member should be excited and ready
to embrace that change but instead I found myself trying to convince co-workers that what we
had been doing for years was ok but now we are aware of better options. We have a low
infection rate at my hospital so every time I presented this change I met resistance from staff
because they did not want to fix something that was not broken. My respect and thankfulness for
References
Hortman, C., & Chung, S. (2015). Positioning Considerations in Robotic Surgery. AORN.
Kilic, S., Ertan, K., & Kose, M. (2014). Patient Positioning, Trocar Placement, and Docking for
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=QdLmBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA37
&dq=lithotomy+trendelenburg+positioning+surgery+with+tape&ots=d8R1n5A-
PU&sig=KC6BMQhs3hgIyEtUmM3pIX53dvE#v=onepage&q=lithotomy%20trendelenb
urg%20positioning%20surgery%20with%20tape&f=false