Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
Quality Teaching Elements (lesson focus) Highlight the appropriate areas
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order thinking
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of important, 1.2 Deep understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
that requires active construction and requires students to engage in higher-order knowledge communication
thinking and to communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality criteria 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work 2.2 Engagement 2.5 Students’ self regulation
productively in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and 2.3 High Expectations 2.6 Student direction
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teacher and students
and among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and important to knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and 3.2 Cultural knowledge 3.6 Narrative
identities, with contexts outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all 3.3 Knowledge
cultural perspective. integration
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
2
Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
Intro Starter activity – Five focus questions Teacher: Moves around class to help S
students. Explains answers on
(see attached) smartboard at front of class
0-15 min Mention again that do in order and that if
need help put up hand. Student: Attempting 5 questions in
their workbook. Check answers
Teacher takes the roll. when provided.
Resources: Smartboard
The teacher asks everyone if they have
completed the questions. The teacher then
displays the answers on the smart board
providing an explanation of all answers in
order. The teacher when finished collects
the answers from each student
$400
100 3
100 3
100 3
100 3
12
This is showing how many 100s in $400
and there is 3 for each hundred”.
3
Now do question 1 in the worksheet.
Teacher walks around classroom helping
students. Teacher asks one student to
verbalise the answer to this question.
$350
100 3
100 3
100 3
50 1.5
10.5
The teacher explains that by simple ratio
comparison means that if there is 3 for
each 100 then what should there be for
50. Ask class if they understand this.
$300
100 2.5
100 2.5
100 2.5
7.5
4
Example 4:
Find 2.5% of $350
$350
100 2.5
100 2.5
100 2.5
50 1.25
8.75
Example 5:
3 % of $ 320
$320
100 3.0
100 3.0
100 3.0
10 0.3
10 0.3
9.6
Example 6:
Putting it all together
8.75% of $243 (more complex)
5
$243
100 8.75
100 8.75
100 8.75
10 0.875
10 0.875
Answer = 10 0.875 $23.25
10 0.875
1 0.0875
1 0.0875
1 0.0875
23.25
Conclusion Teacher summarises the lesson. “We all Teacher: Summary of lesson. T
know percentage is a representation as a Student: Obtain homework
number in each hundred. Now we know
56-60 min how to apply the technique we learnt Resources: Worksheets
today. In our next lesson I will show you
a quicker way to get answers to calculate
percentages of quantities using fractions.
But as you can all see if you get stuck you
can go through this first principle way
and you will get the answer”.
6
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this lesson?
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the
standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this
lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline the
key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
None
7
References (In APA)
Lovitt, C., and Clarke, D. (1988). The Mathematics Curriculum and Teaching Program:
Professional development package. Activity bank. (Vol 1). Woden, A.C.T Curriculum
Development Centre.
Resources Attached:
Attempt in Order. You are only allowed to move to the next questions after attempting the
previous one.
1) Find ½ of 100
4) Judy has 12 cards and Amar has 20 cards, what fraction is Judies cards to Amars.
5) If I get 1/6 of peters large pizza (Area = 804cm squared) is that bigger than 1/3 of
cora’s pizza (Area = 452cm squared).
8
Worksheet – Lesson 1
Name: _______________________
Find
5% of $400 8% of $350 5.5% of $200 3% for $420 7.5% of $550 2.75% for $620
Answer:
9
Name:
Homework sheet
1) 3.5 % of $512 2) 11.5% of $751 (3) Judy makes 16.5% profit selling her car worth $5,600 on Gumtree.
10
Lesson Plan 2
11
Quality Teaching Elements (lesson focus) Highlight the appropriate areas
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order thinking
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of important, 1.2 Deep understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
that requires active construction and requires students to engage in higher-order knowledge communication
thinking and to communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality criteria 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work 2.2 Engagement 2.5 Students’ self regulation
productively in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and 2.3 High Expectations 2.6 Student direction
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teacher and students
and among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and important to knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and 3.2 Cultural knowledge 3.6 Narrative
identities, with contexts outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all 3.3 Knowledge
cultural perspective. integration
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
12
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
Intro Starter activity Teacher: Moves around class to S
help students. Explains answers on
smartboard at front of class
Students enter class, hand completed
0-10 min
homework to teacher and collect marked Student: Attempting 5 questions in
sheets. Sit in their chairs and start to their workbook. Check answers
complete the “5 Questions”. Teacher takes when provided.
the roll. Teacher give hints to students who Resources: smartboard
raise their hands.
Body Using a percentage allows us to express this part- Teacher: Introduces what will be T
11-55min to-whole relationship as a whole number instead of happening in lesson today.
as a fraction or decimal; for example “45% of the
population” means we are talking about 45 out of Student: Active listening
every 100 people. In fraction form, this number
Resources: smartboard
would be 45/100 and in decimal form it would be
0.45. All three forms tell us the same piece of
information. Show visual of percentage, fraction
and decimal. We will just work with fractions and
percentages today.
Informs that the worksheet today has X Teacher: Explains slowly the initial T/S
concept, with examples.
questions. Teacher asks that the students not
copy example in workbook and focus on the Student: Ask any questions and do
explanation. Teacher describes how you worksheet questions after example.
change a % into a fraction. Remember that Examples are graded.
percents are per hundred or %/100. Resources: smartboard/whiteboard
8/100
13
Now if you have a fractional percent what
would you do?
Explains
12.5 % means
=12 1/2 / 100
=25/2/100
=25/200
=1/8
14
Now we did this in the previous lesson. “Can
anyone remember how we did this”. This is a
shortcut method.
55% of $180
$180
100 55
50 27.5
10 5.5
10 5.5
10 5.5
99
55/100 *100+ 55/100*50+
55/100*10+55/100*10+55/100*10
25 x 100
125
= 1/5 x 100
= 20
15
Example type 5: Express 50 cents as
percentage of $8. Note we have to have same
units so:
$8 = 800 cents
50/800 x 100
= 1/16 x 100
= 6.25
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this lesson?
16
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with the
standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated in this
lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS policy- Outline
the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
None
ACARA (2012), National Assessment Program - Naplan exams 2011, Year 7 and 9.
17
Resources Attached:
Attempt in Order. You are only allowed to move to the next questions after attempting the
previous one.
3) Simplify 12.5/100
4)
5) Write the following in ascending order: 2/5, 30%, 1/3, 0.34, -4.3
18
Lesson 2 – Percentages Worksheet 2 Name:
3) Calculate 25 % of $150
6)
19
NAPLAN QUESTIONS:
7)
8)
9)
10)
20
Lesson Plan 3
21
Outcomes Assessment Students learn about Students learn to
Syllabus outcomes Lesson assessment Role of percentages, Solving problems by
fractions, decimals in employing knowledge
communicates and connects Starter activity problem solving and gained about
mathematical ideas using real life. percentages, fractions
appropriate terminology, Group answers and decimals
diagrams and symbols and presentation
MA4-1WM of Problem
Applies appropriate Individual
mathematical techniques to assignment
solve problems MA4-2WM
recognises and explains
mathematical relationships
using reasoning MA4-3WM
22
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified achieved within the lesson?
23
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
Intro At the beginning of the lesson teacher states Teacher: Sets the task. S
that we are going to have some fun in this Student: Sit in groups and discuss,
0-10 min lesson and will integrate the knowledge we create, think deeply
have gathered in the last few lessons to
solve a problem and to create something Resources: Whiteboard/smartboard
involving percentages. Students to forms
groups of 5. Teacher asks students to line
up in order of height and then teacher
assigns numbers for each group 1 to 5.
Students seat according to number.
24
Conclusion We have covered percentages and how to Teacher: Summarises work T
calculate them from first principles and how Student: actively listens
to use shortcuts. We have covered 1) Find
Part questions and 2) Find percent. Our next Resources: none
topic will be questions involving calculating
the whole or 100% when given an amount
and what percentage it is.
25
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this
lesson?
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
none
26
References (In APA)
Resources Attached:
Starter activity:
Something Interesting:
Can you see the pattern? Is this pattern true for all situations? Can you create a
formula for this?
27
THE BIGGEST LOSER – PERCENTAGE PROBLEM
28
SOLUTIONS – BIGGEST LOSER PERCENTAGE PROBLEM
29
Lesson Plan Justification
Lesson Plans contain four elements, Students Outcomes (The why), Content (The
what), strategies/Method (The How) and Resources (The What With). Three lessons
are presented in this assignment, containing all the above elements, on the topic of
percentages NESA syllabus outcome MA4-5NA - Operates with fractions, decimals
and percentages. The class is of mixed ability so a focus on scaffolding and also
monitoring of individual students via questioning is required. Tasks would be
differentiated at the assessment level. Group work will also provide peer tutoring for
students who are having difficulty with main problem solving task in lesson 3.
Collaborative learning supports each students cognitive abilities and interpersonal
efforts in achieving the set task (Loreman, Deppler and Harvey, 2011)
Three different problem structures among percentages are identified in Baratta, Price,
Stacey, Steinle and Gvozdenko (2010) ‘Find-part’, ‘find-percent’ and ‘find-whole’.
This author describes how many students who are reliant on formulas are often only
able to carry out ‘Find-part’ problems. The first two types of problems are developed
in the three lesson plans and the third type would be studied in further lessons of this
unit.
The first of the three lessons is conceptually focused and constructivist/relational and
uses a first principles approach designed by Lovit and Clarke (1988). This lesson is
the first encounter of students with percentages. The technique uses a visual, pattern
method of calculating percentages which can be utilised if the formula or more
procedural way is forgotten by the student and will provide a conceptual knowledge
so all percentage style problems can be attempted. The first lesson is something that a
student will find easier to remember. Lesson designed through this method employs
Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development as they increase in level of difficulty very
gradually, an excellent strategy to develop new learning through scaffolding
(Vygotsky, 1978). The activity is graded and scaffolded so that the student can extend
the concept to any question. The scaffolding works well with a mixed ability group.
30
An example is displayed on the board and then each students follow the same method
in a worksheet question. The teacher moves around the class and provides one on one
help to each of student which works well in a mixed ability group. The teacher also
occasionally asks questions during delivering the content while presenting examples,
to make sure the concept has been understood by all students.
The second lesson is a skill based lesson and relies on an instrumental approach.
It uses a skills based lesson structure and develops concepts of percentages via
explaining “percent meaning per hundred” and using fractions to calculate
percentages as opposed to the first principle percentage approach of Lesson 1. The
student should see that there are different ways to calculate a percent. The use of
Lesson 1 and 2 considered together however aim at increasing students’ relational
understanding of percentage which stays with student for a long time, as opposed to
purely instrumental understanding which is short term (Skemp, 2006). By repeating
similar examples times and then asking students to complete the questions on their
own the teacher build each students’ skill bank. Each slightly harder problem is
delivered in the same manner to increase learning. The students, once fluent in the
concept and skill, are free to form their own algorithms. Homework in first lesson is
kept to a minimum and with each lesson is increases as percentage skills are
developed.
The starter activities for both lesson 1 and 2 is revision of some previously acquired
knowledge, which was covered in a previous lesson for this unit, and students should
be familiar with and will feel comfortable completing the activity. This will increase
students’ confidence in preparing for the new material that will be presented on
percentages. (Ley, 2014) suggested the use of five focus questions concept which not
only acts as a revision for other units but also helps in student motivation when they
are able to achieve doing the questions. Another important aspect of the ‘5 Focus
Questions’ is that the students are directed not to skip questions, rather ask for
teacher’s help if they are stuck. The teacher also provides them positive feedback after
completion of the activity which leads to increased learning and skill development.
31
The third lesson is a group based formative assessment task which integrates all the
understanding of percentages provided in lesson 1 and 2 to a real life problem which
most students would have encountered. It is a problem solving task and involves
numerous percentage calculations. The use of Excel (ICT) at this point helps students
with these calculations and provides understanding of how to use a very useful
industry standard software. The starter activity is for this lesson is not the Five
question quiz but an inquiry based learning exercise which sets the scene for a very
engaging lesson. The lesson takes the form of a constructivist approach to learning by
making connections of what they have learnt in Lesson 1 and 2 to a real world
problem. Group work provides for inclusivity and the final assignment of creating a
poster or application works well with a mixed ability group. Assessment will be
differentiated depending on the ability of each student.
The 3 lessons structure is well developed and follows BLOOMS TAXONOMY. The
first lesson starts off with providing understanding of the concept of percentages, the
second lesson focuses on applying methods to calculate percentages and increasing
skills and the last lesson involves problem solving, analysing and creating work on
percentages.
Both evidence of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers (AITSL, 2011)
and Quality teacher elements have has been incorporated in the lesson plan as a means
of quality controlling them.
Other strategies which have been employed during the lesson planning were to use
questions and verbalizing of the problems. The teacher moving around in class to
monitor progress and replying to students’ queries to make sure all students get
individual attention and that equity is maintained throughout each lesson.
32
References
ACARA (2012), National Assessment Program - Naplan exams 2011, Year 7 and 9.
Baratta W & Price B & Stacey K & Steinle, V & Gvozdenko E (2010), Percentages:
The Effect of Problem Structure, Number Complexity and Calculation Format in L.
Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education:
Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research
Group of Australasia. Fremantle: MERGA.
Goos, M., Stillman, G., & Vale, C. (2007). Teaching secondary school mathematics:
Research and practice for the 21st century. Crows Nest, N.S.W.: Allen & Unwin.
Ley, J. (2014), Too much content too little time. Reflections 39(1), Oxford University
Press, Sydney
Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2011). Inclusive education: Supporting
diversity in the classroom (2nd ed.). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Murphy, K. (2012).
Lovitt, C., & Clarke, D. (1988). First principles Percentage in The Mathematics
Curriculum and Teaching Program: Professional development package. Activity bank.
(Vol 1). Woden, A.C.T Curriculum Development Centre.
NESA, 2017, Mathematics K-10 Syllabus, NSW Syllabus for the Australian
Curriculum.
33
Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88-95. Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/stable/41182357
34