Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Access to and engagement with a quality education is a right that all children are entitled to.
However, there are many factors in our globalised world today which may prevent or reduce
such an opportunity. Students who come from a refugee background for example often
belong to a low socio-economic status and are also one of the most disadvantaged SES
groups. Partnership programs made specifically for these students between educational
institutions may help increase their SES and also improve the quality of their lives. It is also
important for teachers to be trained in and be aware of the diversity that classrooms contain
and be able to recognise and support students from low SES and refugee backgrounds. The
article by Naidoo (2012) ‘Refugee action support: Crossing borders in preparing pre-service
teachers for literacy teaching in secondary schools in Greater Western Sydney’ explores the
integration of the RAS program into institutions and the preparation of teachers to this issue.
This will be discussed in comparison to the article ‘The Refugee Action Support program:
developing understandings of diversity’ (Ferfolja, 2009) which also explores the RAS
The purpose of the study conducted by Naidoo (2012) is to address the needs of refugee
students and their participation in education. This is explored through the implementation of
the RAS program between schools and universities, an initiative of the University of Western
Sydney, the Australian Literacy and Numeracy Foundation and the New South Wales
Department of Education and Training. The study by Ferfolja (2009) also explores the RAS
program but also emphasises on the importance for teacher preparation programs to develop
understandings for diversity. The study by Naidoo (2012) showed that the RAS program
allowed for the development of confidence and self-esteem in students, thereby providing
1
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
them an opportunity to improve in school and engaging in learning. On the other hand,
Ferfolja’s (2009) study found that preservice teachers had a better understanding of diversity
and the importance to build trust with their students through the program. Both the studies
concluded that the implementation of RAS programs do help students positively. Allowing
Both the studies have highlighted in their literature reviews the issue of language proficiency
as a potential barrier for attaining educational stability. The articles draw on previously
conducted research into refugees and schooling to provide insight into the struggles and
needs of refugee students. Ferfolja (2009) outlines the learning needs of refugees being
different to other migrants who have arrived to Australia. This is due to the different nature of
the country they have left, many arrive with little or no schooling (p. 397) and are usually
expected to learn the language as well the cultural and social standards of their new society.
Naidoo (2012) expands on this by providing a solution; the necessity for teachers to follow a
language based approach which focuses on the needs of second language learning (Gee, 2000
cited in Naidoo, 2012). Naidoo (2012) also pointed out that research shows a need for
additional time to be given to refugee students in classrooms through activities which will
improve their literacy and language, an issue not addressed by Fefolja (2009). Ferfolja’s
(2009) study also differs from Naidoo (2012) by describing the role that families play in
education. That is, although many are supportive of their children’s education, due to their
limited English skills or limited resources they may not be able to provide assistance to their
kids at home with their schoolwork, thus it being crucial for teachers to be trained for this
regard. It is important that teachers go through training programs as they are proven to be
more realistic options to address the needs of English language learners (Karabenick & Noda,
2
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
2010). It equips teachers with the necessary knowledge and skills to cater effectively for the
The methodological approach adopted by the two studies was similar, as both undertook a
range of semi-structured one-on-one and group interviews to assess the quality of the
program. Group interviews were conducted as they are seen to be more effective in obtaining
information, this is because they allow for interaction and dialogue amongst participants,
without power differences (Ferfolja, 2009). Naidoo (2012) interviewed classroom teachers,
RAS tutors as well as students who attended RAS tutoring centres, whilst Ferfolja (2009)
only interviewed preservice teachers working as RAS tutors. The exclusion of the
experiences of RAS students in Fefolja’s (2009) study can be identified as a gap in the study
because it reduces the outcome of the RAS initiative. This is due to the fact that students who
participate in the program are able to provide direct insight into how effective the experience
is for them and a failure to do so will not result in quality feedback of the RAS. Both the
studies also ensured that the confidentiality of their participants and the schools remained
intact by labelling them as anonymous. The study by Ferfolja (2009) recorded and transcribed
the data with written permission by the participants. It was crucial that both studies ensured
the privacy of those involved as this is an ethical issue in educational research and practice
(Gall, Gall & Borg, 2015). Furthermore, Naidoo’s data collection included the structure,
effect and value of the RAS program, whereas Ferfolja’s (2009) interviews of only the tutors,
students. The overall approach by both the studies in data collection was effective in
obtaining the required information, a broader interview group for Ferfolja (2009) would have
In the presentation of the research results, both studies presented their information in a
similar manner. There was much evidence of the effectiveness of the RAS program, mostly
3
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
quoted directly from students, RAS tutors and school teachers alike. Naidoo (2012)
categorised the responses as school, tutor and refugee student perceptions towards the
program. The school found the program to be successful due to the joint involvement of
community and family members. Teachers from the school also quoted the tutors to be
‘sensitive of cross-cultural issues’ (p.271), indicating the tutors’ considerate attitudes towards
refugee background students. Results from Ferfolja (2009) similarly, showed RAS tutor
responses to indicate an awareness for diversity and cultures, as well as building trust and
close interaction with the students. It is these close relationships that the tutors had with their
students which focused on reciprocal learning in both studies, allowing the students to be
open and comfortable with their tutors. Despite dominant discourses identifying the teacher
as the individual with power in the classroom (Ferfolja, Diaz & Ullman, 2015), the
supportive interactions that the tutors had with the students in the study, proves to be
breaking down those perceptions. Both studies have highlighted that the end result proved
RAS as an effective learning program, which was made possible through the considerate and
positive behaviours of pre-service teachers. Naidoo’s (2012) student responses also showed
them to be friendly, and able to laugh and joke with their tutors, a quality which made
learning encouraging and supportive for them. In total, the results showed that the RAS
program was quite effective, implemented through school and university partnerships, which
The research articles concluded on a positive note, outlining the benefits the program has
reaped for both students and pre-service teachers. Ferfolja (2009) described the positive
implications that the RAS program had for understanding diversity and the role it plays in
teacher education. This is because it allows teachers to prepare for their future roles, whilst
also broadening their perspectives to be supportive and understanding of various students and
their diverse needs. Naidoo (2012) also highlighted an important factor which Ferfolja (2009)
4
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
did not, that without external assistance such as the partnerships with the university, schools
would not be able to achieve the learning that refugee background students are in need of.
However, Ferfolja (2009) shone light on the topic of the globalised world, thus a knowledge
needs. Overall, the conclusion made by both studies to the research presented the integration
of the RAS as a positive solution and an effective one for building learning needs in refugee
progressive in their learning. Also, with effort to cater to their needs posing as critical to
In light of the background research and current study undertaken, it is important to discuss
the implications for teaching practices that the needs of refugee students and initiatives like
The Refugee Action Support program is an initiative which benefits both students and
teachers in the context of education. The partnership that Western Sydney University has
with schools to implement the RAS allows preservice teachers to engage with refugee
background students, which can help them shape their understanding and teaching practices
in the future (Naidoo, 2012). It can also prove useful in developing their classroom
pedagogies for the future as it will introduce them to a section of the diverse population
present in our societies today. The initiative further supports these future teachers by
instilling in them an appreciation for community strength, resources and the needs and
expectations of the school society (Naidoo, 2012). In regard to refugee students, schools play
a vital role in integrating these students into the school environment (Taylor & Sidhu, 2012)
and so it is important for pre-service teachers to gain an understanding of the practices and
5
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
pedagogies they will need to implement to cater to those students’ needs, a factor which
causes for teachers to be more aware of the diversity of student needs. Refugee students
usually have different needs to other low SES or migrant groups and therefore require teacher
pedagogies to create an inclusive environment, the means to meet psycho-social needs as well
as linguistic needs (Taylor et al, 2012). Schools and classroom pedagogies need to be able to
cater to the social, emotional and learning needs of refugee students, rather than just a focus
on their English learning needs (Taylor, et al, 2012). This does not only call for teachers to be
critically more aware of diversity but rather calls for them to be trained in and capable of
addressing the issues refugee students face with an ability to ensure inclusiveness in their
classroom. This leads to another implication for teaching practices which is what refugee
students are taught. A lot of the time refugee students in Australian schools have come from
very different educational and societal systems and are in need of just more than linguistic
effectively taught o refugee students, along with the role of citizenship and building of a civil
society (Woods, 2009) in order to allow them to successfully become a part of their new
society. These students require literacy needs for their education not only language needs and
therefore an integration into ESL programs will not be enough for these learners (Woods,
2009). Implications for teaching practices will be affected as more refugee background
students are integrated into Australian schooling. Teacher pedagogies are crucial to
addressing the needs of these students and need to become more aware, more trained and
6
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
Conclusion
In conclusion, both articles have discussed the integration of the Refugee Action Support
effective and positive initiative. The findings from both studies including interviews from the
participants concluded that the RAS was successful and provided benefits both for refugee
background students and also for pre-service teachers in training. Yet, due to the dynamics of
the global world many refugee students may not be aware of the societal expectations of the
new setting they are a part of. Therefore it is necessary for teacher pedagogy to create a
supportive environment for them where they are able to progress beyond language needs,
improve their opportunities to a good education and for the betterment of the future.
7
17994910 Parsa Qureshi
References
Ferfolja, T., Diaz, J. C., & Ullman, J. (2015). The Unseen Half: Theories for Educational
Gall, P. J., Gall, D. M., & Borg, W. (2015). Applying educational research: How to read, do
and use research to solve problems of practice. (2nd ed.). Pearson Australia.
https://vuws.westernsydney.edu.au/bbcswebdav/pid-2658004-dt-content-rid-
22276793_1/courses/102096_2017_1h/Loshini_RAS_CaseStudyHighSchool.pdf
com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/15235882.2004.10162612?needAccess=tru
Taylor, S., & Sidhu, K. R. (2012). Supporting refugee students in schools: what constitutes
10.1080/13603110903560085
Woods, A. (2009). Learning to be Literate: Issues of Pedagogy for recently arrived Refugee
10.1080/15427580802679468