Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ongoing debate surrounding ANWAR (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge), global warming, rain forest
depletion, the boreal forest and any number of endangered species and their habitats tends to polarize the
public into "green" environmental and conservative/ pro–development camps. Since the 1970s, radical
environmental groups like Greenpeace have made headlines with terrorist–style exploits to "protect Mother
earth." Meanwhile, a larger, more mature global movement has been evolving. Universities such as
Harvard have inaugurated whole study programs on a relatively recent academic discipline known as
environmental ethics. The National Council of Churches promotes a doctrine of eco–justice, calling for the
'wealthier members of the human family' to make a fundamental reorientation...in the very socioeconomic
structures of our societies and personal lifestyles."
Modern–day evangelical Christians have largely abdicated the issue of environmental responsibility to
those representing radically different positions on the nature of humans as we relate to the natural world
and our responsibilities regarding the environment. On the other hand, much of liberal Christianity reflects
the philosophies of deep ecology, ecocentric environmentalism, ecofeminism, etc. Thus, New Age–oriented
adherents to environmentalism and some who claim to be Christians themselves have misrepresented the
biblical mandate to take dominion over and serve as the stewards of Creation. Yet again, other Christians—
mainly evangelicals—are guilty of ignoring proper care for the Creation, seeing it as a "liberal's issue."
Both extremes invite criticism.
As with any other subject, when exploring a philosophy of environmental ethics, one needs to discern the
underlying worldview in order to understand and critique it:
• What is the philosophy's view of humankind in relation to nature?
• Is human progress seen as bad, good, or even the central issue?
• Is there a true balance between the biblical elevation of man as steward/co–creator/image–bearer
and the avoidance of that role's abuse?
• Backing up a step, is the assumption of man as superior to the rest of nature mere arrogance?
• What are the foundational presuppositions of the various branches of today's environmental
movement and where do they lead?
Our Special Focus examines these questions and more. We encourage your comments or questions.