Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Course Description:
Introduces major contemporary composition theories and their approaches to teaching writing. Provides
a broad and extensive overview of the history, ideology, assumptions, beliefs, and criticisms to various
theories of teaching writing. Involves formal and informal writing assignments, hands-on activities,
group discussions, and opportunities to evaluate the theoretical material from a pedagogical
perspective.
Course Objectives:
1. Gaining factual knowledge (terminology, classifications, methods, trends)
2. Developing specific skills, competencies, and points of view needed by professionals in the field
most closely related to this course
3. Developing skill in expressing oneself orally or in writing
4. Learning to analyze and critically evaluate ideas, arguments, and points of view
Course Texts:
1. Tate, Rupiper, Schick, ed. A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. Oxford, 2001. (GCP)
2. McComiskey, Bruce. Teaching Writing as a Social Process. Utah State UP, 2000. (TW)
3. Flower, Linda. Community Literacy and the Rhetoric of Public Engagement. Southern Illinois UP,
2008. (CL)
4. Davis, Robert, and Mark Shadle. Teaching Multiwriting: Researching and Composing with
Multiple Genres, Medias, Disciplines, and Cultures. Southern Illinois UP, 2008.
5. About $25 for photocopies, multi-media disks, folders, poster board, etc.
6. Own email account & regular, daily internet access from home.
ENG 5183: Teaching Composition 2
Grading Criteria:
Book Review & Discussion.........................…………………….…25%
Founder’s Website & Annotations……………………………..…..30%
Theory-to-Pedagogy Assignment……………………………...…..25%
Quizzes & Final Exam..……………...………............................…20%
Theory-to-Pedagogy Assignment
At the end of the semester, we will have a hefty “assignment bank,” ideas for assignments from
which we can “borrow.” Since much of teaching hangs on “what-to-do-in-class-on-Monday” with very
little time for reflection, I am asking you to this opportunity for reflection, to work out carefully an
assignment based on a theoretical concept that you find intriguing. The purpose then is to not only
supply an assignment that can be used or modified, but more importantly to inspire, to provoke
reflection, to offer unique approaches, to suggest possibilities, and even to challenge prevailing beliefs.
Begin with a theoretical rationale which explains the assignment’s theoretical frame. Then, provide a
syllabus that ranges over 2-4 weeks and lists the daily activities. You may include small assignments
that lead up to a larger assignment. Include an assessment apparatus and a list of learning outcomes,
that is, what students should be able to achieve at the end of the assignment. In addition to a focus on
“what-to-do,” you will also want to consider what students and their teacher are learning and why.
Situate your assignment within a larger concern in the field of composition studies and how that
assignment adds to/complicates/calls into question commonly held ideas about (teaching) writing.
*Note: First, check the E-Journal locator off the UTSA library home page as full text is available for many of these
journals. For browsing the tables of contents of journals, use the UNCOVER database available at:
www.ingenta.com. In addition, many essays are available off www.jstor.org.
Week 2 -- 8 September
Introductions; course expectations, goals, syllabus, assignments; book review project
Discussion – what is English?; what are the goals, purposes, and objectives of
English composition?
Lecture – Major theories, approaches, disciplinary trends & epistemologies (product,
process, social construction, expressivism) in teaching composition; what is the
relationship of theory and practice?
Reading – GCP Process (please read before coming to class)
Reading – (1) Fulkerson, Richard. “Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-First
Century,” CCC 56 (2005): 654-87; (2) Downs, Doug and Elizabeth Wardle. “Teaching
about Writing, Righting Misconceptions.” College Composition and Communication
58.4 (2007): 552-84; (3) Lindeman, Erika, “Three Views of English 101,” CE 57.3
(1995): 287-302; (4) Tate, Gary, “Notes on the Dying of a Conversation,” CE 57.3
(1995): 303-309. (please read before coming to class)
Week 3 -- 15 September
Reading – GCP WAC
Reading – (1) Smagorinsky, Peter. "Constructing Meaning in the Disciplines:
Reconceptualizing Writing across the Curriculum as Composing across the
Curriculum." American Journal of Education 103 (February 1995): 160–84; (2) Odell,
Lee, and Burt Swersey. “Reinventing Invention: Writing Across the Curriculum without
WAC.” Language and Learning Across the Disciplines 6.3 (2003); (3) Flower, Linda S.
and John R. Hayes “Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process.” CE 39.4
(1977): 449-461.
Pedagogy – Strategies for using process and revision
Visitor: Gail Pizzola
Week 4 -- 22 September
Reading – GCP Cultural Studies and Critical Pedagogy
Reading – (1) Giroux, Henry, “Cultural Studies and the Culture of Politics,” Journal of
Advanced Composition 20.3 (2000): 505-40; (2) Berlin, James, “Poststructuralism,
Cultural Studies, and the Composition Classroom,” Rhetoric Review 11.1 (1992):
16-33; (3) Spidel, Cathy, and William Thelin, "Not Ready to Let Go: A Study of
Resistance to Grading Contracts" Composition Studies 34.1 (2006): 35-68; (4)
Stenberg, Shari J., “Liberation Theology and Liberatory Pedagogies: Renewing
the Dialogue,” CE 68.3 (2006): 271-290.
Pedagogy – Strategies for responding to student work
Book Review/Discussion – Welch (Ortega)
Week 5 -- 29 September
Reading – McComiskey
Pedagogy – Strategies for developing writing assignments
ENG 5183: Teaching Composition 6
Book Review/Discussion – Dumbar-Odom (Wheeler)
Week 6 -- 6 October
Reading – GCP Expressive and Collaborative
Reading – (1) Bartholomae, David. "Writing with Teachers: A Conversation with Peter
Elbow." CCC 46 (February 1995), 62–71; (2) Elbow, Peter. "Being a Writer vs.
Being an Academic: A Conflict in Goals." CCC 46 (February 1995): 72–83; (3)
Bruffee, Kenneth A. "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind.'"
CE 46 (November 1984): 635–52; (4) Trimbur, John. "Consensus and Difference
in Collaborative Learning." CE 51 (October 1989): 602–16.
Pedagogy – Strategies for group work and discussion
Book Review/Discussion – Micciche (Cox)
Week 7 -- 13 October
Reading – GCP Feminist
Reading – (1) Bauer, Dale. “The Other 'F' Word: The Feminist in the Classroom.” CE
52 (1990): 385–96; (2) Jarratt, Susan C. "Feminism and Composition: The Case
for Conflict." Contending With Words: Composition and Rhetoric in a Postmodern
Age. Eds. Patricia Harkin and John Schlib. New York: MLA, 1991. 105-123; (3)
Lamb, Catherine E. "Beyond Argument in Feminist Composition." CCC 42 (1991):
11–24; (4) Lunsford, Andrea. “Aristotelian vs. Rogerian Argument: A
Reassessment,” CCC 30.2 (1979): 146-51; (5) hooks, bell. “Engaged Pedagogy.”
Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom.” New York:
Routledge, 1994. 13-22.
Pedagogy – Strategies for integrating issues of materiality
Book Review/Discussion – Sheridan-Rabideau (Mulkey)
Week 8 -- 20 October
Presentations – Founder’s Websites; have handout ready; you may turn in files
digitally by 11:59 p.m. on 21 October.
Week 9 -- 27 October
Reading – GCP Community-Service Learning
Reading – (1) Schutz, Aaron, and Anne Ruggles Gere. "Service Learning and English
Studies: Rethinking 'Public' Service." CE 60 (1998): 129–48.
Reading – Flower ch 1, 2, 3, 4
Pedagogy – Strategies for using writing portfolios
Book Review/Discussion – Mathieu (Barki)
ENG 5183: Teaching Composition 7
Week 10 -- 3 November
Reading – GCP Basic Writing
Reading – (1) Soliday, Mary. "From the Margins to the Mainstream: Reconceiving
Remediation." CCC 47.1 (February 1996): 85–100; (2) Hartwell, Patrick.
“Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar.” CE 47.2 (1985): 105-27.
Reading – Flower ch 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Pedagogy – Strategies for teaching grammar
Book Review/Discussion – Mulroy (Coleman)
Week 11 -- 10 November
Reading – GCP Rhetorical
Reading – (1) Berlin, James A. "Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class." CE 50
(September 1988): 477–94; (2) Killingsworth, M. Jimmie. “Rhetorical Appeals: A
Revision.” Rhetoric Review 24.3 (2005): 249–63; (3) Lunsford, Andrea A., and
Lisa S. Ede. "Classical Rhetoric, Modern Rhetoric, and Contemporary Discourse
Studies." Written Communication 1 (January 1984): 78–100; (4) Pixton, William.
“The Triangle and the Stance.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 17.3 (1987): 263-79.
Pedagogy – Strategies for using the rhetorical triangle
Book Review/Discussion – Killingsworth (Tougaw) and Ballif (Pena)
Week 12 -- 17 November
Reading – GCP Technology
Reading -- (1) Yancey, Kathleen Blake. “Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a
New Key.” CCC 56.2 (2004): 297-328.
Reading – Davis and Shadle ch 1 & 2
Pedagogy – Strategies for teaching with technology
Book Review/Discussion – Banks (Manboard)
Week 13 -- 24 November
Reading – Davis and Shadle ch 3, 4, 5
Pedagogy – Strategies for teaching with technology
Book Review/Discussion – Howard and Robillard (Glasscock)
Week 14 -- 1 December
Theory-to-Pedagogy assignment and presentations due
Overview – Final Exam
Week 15 -- 8 December
Study Day -- No Class
Week 16 -- 15 December
Final Exam, 5:00-7:30 p.m.