Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A. Theoretical Review
1. Reading Comprehension
comprehension means construct the meaning from text that they have
read and it is not just imitate the word by word. Moreover, in this case
1
John Guthrie T. et.al, Motivating Reading Comprehension, (London: Lawrence
Eilbaum Associates, 2004), P. 246
2
Ibid. P. 229
9
3
between reader and related to the text itself. Based on the statements
above it could say that reading comprehension means that to get an idea
one of activity to get more information and knowledge base on the text.
reading.5
meaning of vocabulary words that find in the texts, and learning how to
is how we could recognize the meaning of the text with some strategies
book Kristin Lems said reading comprehension is about how we can get
3
Karen R Harris and Steve Graham. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with
Learning Difficulties,( New York: The Guilford Press, 2007), p. 8
4
Mary E. Curtis and John R. Kruidenier, Teaching Adult to Read, (Wangshiton DC:
National Institute for Literary, 2005) ,p. 9
5
Barbara J Guzzetti, Literacy in America,(California: Library of congress Catalogy,
2002), p. 354
6
Abd Al Hameed Al Odwan Talal. “The Effect of The Directed Reading Thinking
Activity Through Cooperative Learning On English Secondary Stage Students’ Reading
Comprehension In Jordan.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science vol 2, 2012:
140
10
comprehend from the text not how we can read the text.7 Base on the
background knowledge.
of the author within the text, which involves the experience and
comprehension.8
1) Cognitive Strategy
7
Kristin Lems, et.al, Teaching Reading To English Language Learner, (New York: The
Guilford Press, 2010), p. 170
8
NSW Department of Education and Training. Teaching Comprehension Strategies.
(New South Wales: NEALS, 2010), p.2
11
linguistic clues, using text markers, skipping the difficult parts’ and
2) Metacognitive strategy
1) Novice-level readers
Novice-level readers, the readers that are able to recognize the writing
2) Intermediate-level reader
9
Crown. Understanding Reading Comprehension, ( Norwich: Sure Raising Standards,
2005), p.5.
10
Sanggam Siahaan, Issues in Linguistics, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008), p.106
12
Intermediate-level readers, the readers that are able to find the main
gist, key ideas, and some supporting details of narrative text types on
finer point.
3) Advanced-level reader
4) Superior-level reader
technical prose.
13
or unfamiliar to them.
purpose of learning about features of text like main idea or cause and
11
Wooley G, Reading Comprehension Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties,
(Hardcover, 2011), p. 259
14
comprehension:12
contained in the first sentence. In longer passages, the main idea may be
concluding statements.
Cause and effect is about how events relate to one another. Words
4. Making inference
12
State of NSW Department of Education and Communities. Reading Comprehension
Ability. 2011, p.1NSW through the Department of Education and Communities 2011.
15
6. Sequencing
To understand and follow a passage well, the reader needs to know the
7. Drawing conclusion
The aim is to consider all that has been said and interpret what it is
about. This may include a summary statement at the end or the author’s
the skills and knowledge that are involved in reading. They include
read a text and then answer questions about the content of the text. There
1) Pronominal Questions
These questions beginning with who, what when, how, why, etc.
because the learners must write the answers. The questions can ask
13
I.S.P. Nation, Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing, (New York and London:
Routledge, 2009), p. 75
16
directly from the passage. This makes them easier to mark. The
learners can also answer questions using their first language. Instead
This question forms are all grouped together because the answer
thus the learners do not have to compose their answer. This question
only need short answer. Thus, the students do not have to need a
3) True/false sentences
True or False, or by copying the sentences that are true and not
for more learning to take place. The learners may also be asked to
rewrite the false sentences making changes so that they are now true.
4) Multiple-choice sentences
These questions are easy to mark. If four choices are given, the
14
ibid, p. 77
15
ibid, p. 78
17
questions are not well made, often the students’ chances are higher.
Good multiple-choice questions are not easy to make and often they
are more difficult than they should be. This is because the wrong
choices must seem possible and not stupid. If they are possible then
5) Sentence completion
show that they understand the reading passage. The sentences come
after the reading passage. There are four different types of sentence
completion. The students are helped if there is a short line for each
letter of the missing word, if the first letter is given and so on.
6) Information Transfer
text. The students read the text and fill in the diagram with short
7) Translation
16
ibid
18
ideas and viewpoints, not minor details. These are called higher order
the question about what they have read. Formats include multiple choice,
short answer, and cloze or fill in the blank questions. Teachers can assess
observing students while they read or by asking them about the strategies
they use.18
17
Elizabeth S. Pang, et.al Teaching Reading,(Switzerland 2003), p. 18
18
Curtis E. Mary, Teaching Adult., p. 9
19
the teacher and opportunity to guide students to think like good reader
section and guess in the next section that will happened in the story of
19
M.Nazari and M. R. Hashemi, (2012).Cooperative directed reading-thinking activity
and referential-inferentialreading comprehension skills. The Iranian EFL Journal, 8(5). Retrieved
on Jan. 12, 2013
20
Barbara J Guzzetti, Litaracy in America, (California: Library of congress
Catalogy,2002), p. 134
21
Judy S Richardo, Raymond, Charlene, Reading to Learn in the Content Areas,
(Wadsworth Cengange Learning, 2009), p. 108
22
Ibid, p. 111
20
way for comprehending and analyzing the text base on their reading
not able yet to predict such as what it is expected, the teacher can help
23
Judy T. Brunner, I don’t Get It, (America: Rowman and Littlefield Press, 2011),p.56
24
Mohammad Mehdi Yazdani, “The Explicit Instruction of Reading Strategy: Directed
Reading Thinking Activity vs. Guided Reading Strategies.” International journal of Applied
Linguistics & English Literature vol.4 (2015) : 54
21
comprehending the text and thinking what they have read. 25 It could say
students’ prior knowledge so that the teacher should guide the students
thinking activity has purpose to help the students in reading and ask the
own ideas.28 In other hand, directed reading thinking activity strategy has
teaching. The first phase, the teacher guide the students to thinking and
25
Brunner, I don’t Get It in Stauffer, p. 56
26
Judy S. Richardo, Raymond, Charlene, Reading to Learn in the Content Areas, p.114
27
Barbara J Guzzetti, Literacy in America, p. 135
28
Talal Abd Al Hameed Al Odwan. “The Effect Of The Directed Reading Thinking
Activity Through Cooperative Learning On English Secondary Stage Students’ Reading
Comprehension In Jordan, in Alamsi (2003) p. 141
22
the second phase the teacher clarify the difficult vocabulary.29 It means
1) Predicting
teacher’s reading title of the text and asking the students to predict
what will happen next.31 It involves the students about the text that
2) Reading
students have to read the text to involve their own reading. After
and whether they like the story.34 In other hand, both teacher and
29
Guzzetti J Barbara, Literacy in America, p. 134
30
Judy S. Richardo, et.al, Reading to Learn in the Content Areas, in Stauffer (1969)
p.108
31
Barbara J Guzzetti, Literacy in America, p. 134
32
Judy S. Richardo, et.al, Reading to Learn in the Content Areas, p. 109
33
ibid
34
Ibid p. 112
23
3) Proving
what the text base on their prediction and reading in the first section.
reading even though their prediction appropriates with the text itself.35
It means that proving is just to give encourage the students find the
reading.
35
ibid p. 114
24
condition can be controlled by the teacher and also participant all of the
students.
B. Action Hypothesis
36
Judy T. Brunner , I don’t Get It, p. 57
37
C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology, (New Delhi: New Age International (P) Limited
Publisher, 2004), p. 184