Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
General Observations
o Material Master changes not required to activate / deactivate PAL
o No control at customer master level
o Once PAL configuration under AATP is activated, PAL configuration under Sales
Distribution is obsolete
o Setup of PAL is managed via 4 Fiori Apps rather than configuration and hence no TR
required
o Like ZPT_ALLOC_ITEM table we can define characteristics like Sales Org, Customer,
Plant etc and combine to create characteristic value combination (CVC). This is also
referred as Product Allocation Object
o Concept of collective allocation….. the 1st record above is an example of collective
allocation where both records are mutually exclusive based on Sold to Party
o Real time analytics to view the consumption
Unrestricted availability is similar to clicking YES on the allocation pop-up and allowing
confirmation more than the open allocation qty
o We can use ‘No availability’ constraint for zero confirmation i.e restricting one customer
to buy a certain material .
Recommendation:
o Make use of the record setup for allocation to do away with huge allocation custom
tables
o Customer Master allocation control can be moved to condition record setup to avoid
master data change for activation / deactivation
o This will help us to make use of embedded analytics
o Enhance the PAL logic to suit ABC requirement of Pop-up for override and rejection of
EA
o Check how collective allocation can be used to address group allocation logic
Product Allocation:
Pros:
Most settings are established via SAP Fiori apps. Configurations, master data, and
transaction data reside in the same application, SAP S/4HANA. Unified and simplified data
model.
Embedded Analytics
Standard Allocation object setup can be used instead of the huge Z-tables for allocation
records
Cons:
Impacts/Benefits:
Opportunity to revisit the allocation logic and see how we can maximize the use of PAL
provided in S/4 HANA
Will require enhancements in the existing allocation logic similar to Listing Exclusion in ECC
Fit/Gaps to:
Functionality/technical benefit
Characteristic Value Combination record setup can replace Z-tables for product allocation
records
Constraint Status can be used to decide whether to over allocate or not
Will require enhancements in the existing allocation logic similar to Listing Exclusion in ECC
Pros:
Most settings are established via SAP Fiori apps. Configurations, master data, and
transaction data reside in the same application, SAP S/4HANA. Unified and simplified data
model.
Profitability based ATP confirmation via BOP expected in the near future
Cons:
BOP changes stock situation across orders depending on the confirmation strategy
If a particular BOP run fails then need to check how the alert will be sent out to Helpdesk
Impacts/Benefits:
Make use of GAIN confirmation strategy and rule of First come first served (orders to
ascending manner to be fulfilled) to meet ABC requirement
Will require enhancements in the existing BOP logic similar to check licensing / listing
exclusion
Fit/Gaps to:
Make use of GAIN confirmation strategy and rule of First come first served (orders to
ascending manner to be fulfilled) to meet ABC requirement
BOP run can be scheduled for every plant. No separate CPS scheduling required
If a particular BOP run fails then need to check how the alert will be sent out to Helpdesk